Hercolano

Layla Anwar-Narrated by an Invisible Thread.

2012-01-28T01:36:00.000-08:00

Narrated by an Invisible Thread.

Layla Anwar

January 26, 2012

I am stuck with words, a horrible feeling that feeling of being stuck...with words. Yet at the same time that gut feeling, like some stone, a rock lodged in my plexus needs to be dealt with, needs to be narrated, a short story maybe...that won't give it justice.

I do what I can. I am not a passive observer, a detached spectator engaged in some scientific study...even though I try to use "reason", like some safety pad, that will absorb the other's pain....and mine.

I like to consider myself a good listener. I am also curious, not because I want to invade the other's person territory, but because I need a complete picture...this need for a complete picture is crucial for me. I am not sure how, or why, but I find it necessary...maybe by forming this complete picture in my mind, the narrative speaks by itself, effortlessly...like a river, like the Tigris, like the Euphrates...maybe also because I need to take that trip myself, with the narrator, down his and her memory lane, and in the process find mine, so all the pieces may fit into a "rational" whole. A process of finding meaning, of tying loose ends, of uncovering secrets, lost hopes, vanquished desires and unfinished grief....but also a process of finding amid the pieces -- the resolve, the resilience, the faith...like some invisible thread that has kept it all together, in the realm of ...of Sanity... there is no better word...yes, a Sanity, that in retrospect, becomes a Life philosophy -- an acceptance of Life as it is.

It is only there, in that process of listening and narrating, does one realize, the courage, bravery, fortitude, strength, force, of the ordinary Iraqi. I don't think the word ordinary is befitting but short of a better word, I will keep it.

The very imperfect ordinary Iraqi, who has seen and experienced much, way too much...before 2003, after 2003 and until this very day... the hard times, the very hard times, the losses, the displacement, the separation, the abandonment, the neglect, the exile, the daily struggles, on all levels, plus the violence, an indescribable violence, an indescribable brutality, that has ripped through his being, and etched itself there, like some permanent sign post...yet she still manages, he still manages...to function, to interact, to create, to give, to receive...

We are not talking here of a couple of years period, we are talking decades...and that ordinary Iraqi is no blank virgin slate, she also has her own personal story, way before you appeared in her life...he also has his own "baggage" as you call it in your jargon...suitcases upon suitcase, trunk upon trunk of accumulated life traumas, shocks, losses, bereavement...

You take us for granted and we take ourselves for granted...none of you would have survived sane, none. None of you would have been able to function...I mean just look at you, over 60 years have elapsed since the 2nd World War and it still comes up in your discussions, yet so much is expected of us, encapsulated in that dirty phrase that you so often repeat --- Get on with it.

Get on with it - if you had gone through a small percentage of what we go through, you would not even get by, let alone get on with it. But you are not what matters, you are trivia - irrelevant. What matters is us and our story...and you only appear in it to confirm what we already know about you. You are the Devil's facilitator, so to speak...at the end of the story, like the Devil himself, you are nothing but a debased creature that rots in Hell. And your role ends there, miserably so.

You story does not interest me, but ours does and it is in these instances, when the story unfolds in its minutest details, that I see that invisible thread keeping it all together...an invisible thread you will never recognize, nor understand...because you simply don't have it in you. An invisible thread that no amount of violence, of losses, of grief can severe, or cut, it is an umbilical cord, it is beyond gut, beyond viscera, beyond mind, beyond logic, something beyond your grasp, beyond your reach...not through invasions, bombs, guns, drones, jets, soldiers, contractors, mercenaries, missionaries, preachers, businessmen, marketeers, traders, politicians, parliaments, councils, committees, NGOs, development, progress, modernity, technology, satellite TV, computers or cell phones...

A something, beyond language, beyond words, that made the ordinary Iraqi in ancient times and that keeps him together today...a something that only an Iraqi can narrate -- an invisible something that gives us resilience and in that resilience we find our resistance.

Revolution from Above (Kerry Bolton's new book)

2012-01-28T01:07:00.000-08:00

ALTERNATIVE RIGHT
By Alex Kurtagic

NEW BOOK--

Kerry Bolton
Revolution from Above
London: Arktos Media, 2011

The popular imagination conceives Marxism and capitalism as opposing forces, imagining that—obviously—Marxists want the capitalists’ money and capitalists do not want Marxists to take it from them

Kerry Bolton’s Revolution from Above disproves this notion.

As it turns out, and as many readers probably already know, the Marxist revolutions in the East succeeded in many places thanks to the ample funds supplied to them—consciously and voluntarily—by finance-capitalists in the West.

With access to all the money they could wish for and more, the finance-capitalists in Bolton’s narrative were, and are, primarily motivated by a desire for power, and their ultimate aim was not even more money per se, but the enduring ability to shape the world to their convenience, which translates into a collectivised planet of producers and consumers.

Marxism was useful in as much as it was a materialistic ideology that destroyed traditional structures and values and turned citizens into secular, deracinated wage slaves, irrespective of race, gender, age, creed, disability, or sexual orientation.

Capitalism was useful in as much as it made money the measure of all things and created a consumer culture that ultimately turned citizens into debt slaves, also irrespective of race, gender, and so on.

In this manner, Marxism and capitalism were seen as complementary, as well as a method of pacifying the citizenry: too busy labouring in the factory or in the cubicle, and too befuddled by daydreams of shopping and entertainment during their free time, the citizens of this global order, fearful of losing their jobs and not being able to buy things or satisfy their creditors, are left with little inclination to, or energy for, rebellion.

Bolton explains how the finance-capitalist oligarchy is the entity that truly runs our affairs, rather than the national governments. The latter are either financially dependent, or in partnership, with the financiers and the central bankers.

To illustrate this dependency he documents the United States’ government relationship with the Bolsheviks in Russia during the revolution, not to mention the similarity in their goals despite superficial appearances to the contrary and despite alarm or opposition from further down the hierarchy. Bolton shows how genuinely anti-communist efforts were frustrated during the Cold War. And he shows that the close relationship with communist regimes ended when Stalin decided to pursue his own agenda.

The book then goes on to describe the various mechanisms of plutocratic domination. Bolton documents the involvement of a network of prominent, immensely rich, tax-exempt, so-called ‘philanthropic’ organisations in funding subversive movements and think tanks. Marxism has already been mentioned, but it seems these foundations were also interested in promoting feminism and the student revolts of 1968.

Feminism was sold to women as a movement of emancipation. Bolton argues, and documents, that its funders’ real aim was to end women’s independence (from the bankers) and prevent the unregulated education of children: by turning women into wage-slaves they would become dependent on an entity controlled by the plutocrats, double the tax-base, double the size of the market, and create the need for children’s education to be controlled by the government—an entity that is, in turn, controlled by the plutocrats. Betty Friedan, who founded the second wave of feminism with her book The Feminine Mystique, and Gloria Steinem are named as having received avalanches of funding from ‘philanthropic’ foundations.

With regards to the university student revolts of 1968, the book highlights the irony of how, without the activists knowing it, they were backed by the same establishment they thought to be opposing. These students were but ‘useful idiots’ in a covert strategy of subversion and social engineering.

The subversion does not end there, for the plutocracy has global reach and is as actively engaged in global planning today as it ever was. Revolution from Above inevitably deals with George Soros’ involvement in the overthrow of governments or regimes not to his liking. According to Bolton’s account, the reader can take it for granted that any of the velvet or ‘colour revolutions’ we have seen in recent years have been funded in some way or another by George Soros through his extended network of instruments. ‘Regime-changes’ in Yugoslavia [ΕΔΩ, ΓΝΩΡΙΖΟΜΕ ΑΠΟ ΠΡΩΤΟ ΧΕΡΙ ΤΟ ΠΩΣ ΟΡΓΑΝΩΘΗΚΕ Η "ΑΝΤΙΣΤΑΣΙ" ΚΑΙ ΤΑ ΑΠΙΘΑΝΑ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΙΚΑ ΠΟΣΑ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΑΦΑΝΤΑΣΤΗ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΗ ΥΠΟΣΤΗΡΙΞΗ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΝ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΚΑΘΟΔΗΓΗΣΙ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΥΣ ΑΝΤΙΦΡΟΝΟΥΝΤΕΣ ΠΡΟΣ ΤΟΝ ΜΙΛΟΣΕΒΙΤΣ ΑΠΟ ΤΑΣ ΕΠΙΣΗΜΟΥΣ ΥΠΗΡΕΣΙΑΣ ΤΩΝ ΗΠΑ], Georgia, Ukraine (orange revolution), Kyrgyszstan (pink revolution), Tunisia (jasmine revolution), Egypt (white revolution), Lybia (red, green, black revolution), and Iran (green revolution) were not the result of spontaneous uprisings. Anti-government parties, think tanks, media, campaigns, demonstrations, and even training courses for political agitation—all and in all cases received vast funding from finance-capitalism overseas, not from local collections of petty sums.

In other words, many a modern revolution has not come from below, but from above. And in the context of governments being in a dependent relationship to the stratospherical plutocracy, this aggregates into a pincer strategy, with pressure coming secretly from above and from below, with the pressure from below—however spontaneous and ‘messy’ it may seem when it hits the headlines—being the result of years of careful planning, financing, and preparation by overseas elites.

The reader must ask himself how it is that whenever we see one of these ‘colour revolutions’ somehow someone is able, almost overnight, to overwhelm the streets with a tsunami of well designed, professionally printed, and colour-coordinated merchandise: flags, scarves, placards, posters, leaflets, balloons, headbands, t-shirts, face-paint, you name it, it all seems very slick, aesthetically consistent, and fashion-conscious for uprisings that are supposedly spontaneous demonstrations of popular rage.

Overall Bolton crams in an enormous mass of information within 250 pages. The lists of names and figures—and some of the sums involved are truly staggering—are endless, and the persistent torrent of footnotes considerably expand on parts of the main narrative. The plutocrats’ web of influence and deceit is immensely complicated, not only as a structure but also as a process, since it thrives in double meaning, double think, and ambiguity. Those interested in a detailed knowledge of the machinations behind current and recent events, or even twentieth-century political history, would do well to read this book more than once—at least if they have ambitions of explaining it all to an educable third party.

One aspect of Bolton’s narrative that seems quite amazing is the superficially inoffensive tone of some of the enemy quotes provided. Were it not because Bolton’s findings flow in the same direction as other books uncovering the machinations of the oligarchs and their partners in Western governments, or because the answer to cui bono is provided unequivocally by the unfolding of current and historical events, it would be easy to think that the statements quoted came from deluded idealists. It may be that some truly believe in the goodness of their cause, yet such selfless altruism is hard to believe given the known absence of ethics among our current elite of super-financiers—the banking system they engineered, not to mention many of the opaque financial instruments we have come to known through the still unfolding financial crisis in the West, is a deception designed to obscure a practice of legalised theft.

The lessons are clear: firstly, modern ‘colour revolutions’ are not instigated by public desires for more democratic or liberal governance, but by private desires for increased global power and control; secondly, subversive movements can be given a name and a face—a name and a face averse that hides behind generic institutional names and orchestrates world events at the end of a complex money trail; and thirdly, the those seeking fundamental change should first become proficient capitalists or learn how to gain access to them. These are all obvious, of course, but Revolution from Above is less about teaching those lessons than about documenting how the world is run, by whom, and for what purpose. In other words, this is material with which to back up assertions likely to be challenged by, or in front of, the unaware. Sober and factual in tone, it is also good gift material for those who may benefit from a bit of education.

Why Rockefeller Created Canadian & Quebec Nationalism

2012-01-27T14:37:00.000-08:00

Why Rockefeller Created Canadian & Quebec Nationalism

By wmw_admin on April 27, 2010

Henry Makow.com April 24, 2010

(Read French? See This Blog )

It seems counterintuitive but both Canadian nationalism and Quebec Nationalism were born in the late 1960′s out of the globalist plan for North American “free trade.” Canadian nationalism was needed to repatriate the Constitution, a prerequisite for Free Trade; while, Quebec nationalism was needed to reassure French Canadians their rights would not be jeopardized by this action.

This illustrates how the Illuminati often get what they want by appearing to seek the opposite. In Arnold Toynbee’s words in 1931:

“The harder we press our attack upon the idol [of national sovereignty], the more pains we take to keep its priests and devotees in a fool’s paradise – lapped in a false sense of security which will inhibit them from taking up arms in their idol’s defense….”

WHAT HAPPENED

In 1967, the hundredth anniversary of Canadian confederation, David Rockefeller gave a speech advocating a North American “Free Trade” zone. Free trade leads to the loss of economic sovereignty and one world government. Twenty years later, in 1988, Canadians re-elected Brian Mulroney who brought in Free Trade.

Mulroney was a Conservative but the Rockefellers owned both major political parties in Canada. They have owned the Liberal party ever since Mackenzie King was elected in 1921. King was a former employee of Rockefeller and his campaign were always paid with Rockefeller money. In exchange for this, the liberals would always raise the price of gasoline six months before and after an election in order to pay Rockefeller back.

In order to sign a Free Trade deal with the US, Canada had to be a sovereign country. This was achieved in 1982 when the Constitution was brought back from London. Otherwise, opponents of the deal could have made some sort of constitutional complaint which could have derailed the whole process.

The repatriation of the British North America act (BNAA) was tried several times but was always opposed in Quebec by true nationalists like Premier Maurice Duplessis. The BNAA gave a lot of autonomy to the provinces and any modification could only mean loss of powers for Quebec.

So the only way to reform the constitution would be through a phony crisis. Cue two old Commie Freemason friends: Lévesque and Trudeau. The same month that Rockefeller called for Free Trade, Justice Minister Pierre Trudeau proposed repatriating the Constitution.

Two months later, in November 1967, the PQ (Quebec Separatist Party) was born party to pressure Canada to repatriate the Constitution and to weaken Canada as a nation.

Quebec is run by French Grand Orient Freemasonry. This is the reason
this province went from arch Catholic to arch anti-Catholic today.
This also explain why Quebec has recently banned burkhas in government offices while France is also debating on the same subject at the same time.

1968 BILDERBERG MEETING

The 1968 Bilderberg meeting at Mont Tremblant Quebec was attended by the future PQ leader Jacques Parizeau along with Trudeau, Claude Ryan (editor of the influential newspaper Le Devoir and future leader of the “NO” side at the 1980 “sovereignty association” referendum) as well as Jean Victor Allard, the Canadian army chief of staff…

Talk about false opposition. Both sides of the “Quebec Separatist” debate belong to the internationalist Bilderberg Club.

List of Bilderberg participants.

The last thing the Bilderberg wants is a real independent Quebec, nor do they want a truly independent Canada.

What they want is REGIONALISM, meaning a weak and decentralized Canada which is easier for the globalist to manipulate, like the countries in the EU for example. So the globalists encouraged Quebec nationalism to weaken Canada.
Quebec premier Robert Bourassa was a great admirer of the European model of decentralized power: Canada requires “elastic federalism” he told the CFR in Jan. 1969.

In 1976, René Lévesque gave a speech at the CFR in Chicago before he became premier asking for US support.

In the 1980 referendum, the YES side only got 42% of the vote which was also the same % that the PQ got at the 1976 election. They won a majority of seats but lost the popular vote. In fact, the PQ never got a majority of votes in any provincial elections so how could they still dream to win over a majority of the votes in a referendum?

CONCLUSION

Canadian nationalism and Quebec separatism have only served as a catalyst to advance free trade and the New World Order.

In 1982, Canada become sovereign. Ironically this was only a step toward losing its sovereignty again.

A day BEFORE the constitution was repatriated in March, 1982, the Canadian Senate published a report on the necessity of free trade. The following year Free Trade talks with the US began.

PQ leaders have always been great supporters of free trade and globalism. On March 26,1985 separatist and future Premier Bernard Landry came out for Free Trade.

Future Separatist Premier Jacques Parizeau called for a North American currency in Dec 1991.

Canadian nationalists were also globalist shills. All of this provides another reminder that mainstream politics is a charade designed to steer the public down a path established decades if not centuries ago.

911-There was a huge explosion in the basement!!!

2012-01-27T14:30:00.000-08:00

“Last Man Out” Makes Shocking 9/11 Disclosure

By wmw_admin on August 12, 2011

Flyby News – August 11, 2011

By Richard Roepke

“There was a huge explosion in the basement—several seconds before the plane hit the tower!”

William “Willy” Rodriguez is the 9/11 hero who helped save hundreds of lives, and the last person to escape alive from the World Trade Center (WTC) Towers.

Inasmuch as the thrust of this narrative is meant to be about the honor, nobleness, and benevolence of heroism, be forewarned.

In its effort to reveal the essential goodness that resides in the hearts of most human beings, it also inexorably exposes the vilest evil that festers in the minds of a few.

Once past the heroism, this story begins to slice through the slimy underbelly of a vile, pathological beast that controls our lives, and gives us glimpses of the innards of this creature that grins gleefully at our gullibility and simple innocence while trampling on our most basic human rights.

This story is a wake-up call to the citizens of planet Earth.

Decorated Hero

Employed at the WTC for 19 years as a maintenance worker, Rodriguez was responsible for the upkeep and safety of the stairwells within the 110-storey North Tower. On the morning of 9/11, Rodriguez was the only person at the WTC site with the master key to the North Tower stairwell doors. [NB: For fire containment purposes, only doors on every fourth level were normally left unlocked.]

In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, Rodriguez personally rescued fifteen injured persons from the WTC by leading—often carrying—them to safety. Having evacuated the injured from the basement levels, he rushed back into the tower and led firefighters up the stairwells. Unlocking doors to various floors as they ascended, he aided in the successful evacuation of unknown hundreds of survivors.

At great risk to his own life, Rodriguez re-entered the structure three times, and even rescued people trapped between floors in elevator cars by lowering ladders down into shafts. Having helped lead everyone he could find to safety, he finally decided to exit the building.

Rodriguez is believed to be the last person to leave the collapsing North Tower alive.

He survived the building’s collapse by diving beneath a fire truck, where he lay trapped, completely buried in a mountain of dust and rubble for over two hours. Barely able to breathe, he thought he would “die for sure” under that truck where he was literally entombed.

An agnostic, he prayed for the first time in his adult life. As he now unshakably believes, God does listen to heartfelt prayers, and miracles do happen.

A policeman who had been standing across the street had caught a fleeting glimpse of Rodriguez as he leapt under the truck a split second before the tower collapsed in an avalanche of debris.

It was this officer who later returned with help believing that the man under that truck might still be alive.

Rodriguez has been spiritually transformed by this experience and has embraced his faith again with deep reverence.

For his outstanding heroism during America’s desperate hour, William Rodriguez received a special commendation for valor from President George W. Bush at a special White House ceremony.

And that is the extent of the official story as it pertains to William Rodriguez’s involvement relating to rescue efforts following the 9/11 attacks.

But, as you shall see, his incredible heroism was but the tip of the 9/11 iceberg.

“Bombs! Bombs!”

Heroism and accolades aside, what is truly incredible about Rodriguez’s story is a shocking fact that has been concealed from public knowledge, and remains largely unknown to this day.

Rodriguez and a handful of co-workers who were down in the basement at the time of the attack, actually heard and felt huge explosions beneath their feet in the lower basement levels.

While this anomaly in itself should have been cause for serious investigation, it is the timing of these explosions that is extremely troubling:

They occurred several seconds before the first airplane impacted the tower.

The first of these explosions, which occurred about 7-8 seconds before the plane struck the tower was so powerful it literally threw Rodriguez upwards, clean off the floor, as parts of the false ceiling collapsed onto and around him.

Rodriguez heard and felt at least three explosions going off down in the basement levels within seconds of each other.

Absolute pandemonium broke out, with screams of “Bombs! Bombs!” rising above the din as terrified workers scattered in all directions, frantically seeking ways to escape.

[NB: There were a total of six basement levels. Level-2, immediately below Rodriguez’s position and the apparent location of the first explosion, was a “Mechanical Floor”—a restricted access area.]

But the “bombs” were by no means confined to the basement levels.

During his subsequent rescue efforts on the upper floors, Rodriguez claims he heard explosions going off “all over the building.”

Felipe David, a colleague, who was working at the far end of basement Level-1 across from Rodriguez, fell victim to the second explosion. David was walking towards a supply room when the entire wall suddenly exploded in front of him.

Burned beyond recognition, David managed to stagger towards Rodriguez when Willy took one look at the man and froze.

The skin on his face had almost completely peeled away exposing raw, pink flesh, and the burnt skin of his outstretched arms was hanging horrifically, “like sheets of loose cloth.”

David was the first casualty whose life Rodriguez saved by carrying him up to paramedics at street level, after which he returned to the basement in spite of police orders.

The 9/11 Commission Hearing

At the closed-door 9/11 Commission hearing, Rodriguez testified under oath that explosions were going off in the basement of the North Tower before the first plane impacted the building.

He explained in great detail to the Commissioners the numerous cases of serious injuries he had personally witnessed that were caused by these explosions.

He even provided the panel with a list of firsthand witnesses to the explosions, people who were ready to testify under oath.

One of the individuals Rodriguez recommended the panel summon was his friend and fellow employee, John Mongello.

Mongello was in the lobby of the neighboring South Tower when the first aircraft plowed into the North Tower where Rodriguez was located.

It would be another sixteen minutes before the second aircraft would rip into the one Mongello was in.

Yet, within a minute of the first plane hitting the North Tower, an elevator in the South Tower exploded to smithereens right before his eyes!

Mongello and others were literally blown backwards by the blast, as people—many, horribly burned—began to run willy-nilly shrieking in pain, shock, and sheer terror. Thick, black smoke could be seen billowing out of the now exposed elevator shaft, and the pungent smell of “gunpowder” was very evident.

Again, just as with the North Tower, this explosion occurred inside a building that had not yet been struck by a plane!

How could a plane crashing into the North Tower possibly have caused elevators in the South Tower to explode?

The esteemed 9/11 Commission never bothered to ask.

Worse, and to his utter disbelief, Rodriguez later discovered that his statements were completely omitted from the official record. As a result, not one word of this decorated hero’s startling testimony appeared in the much-ballyhooed 9/11 Commission Report, a document that continues to be touted as “the most detailed, definitive study of the events of 9/11.”

Furthermore, Rodriguez was told, quite emphatically, not to speak about the explosions to others until “further investigations” had been carried out. As the world knows, this has yet to happen.

As a result of much public pressure, the Commission’s investigation records were finally made public—seven years later, in January 2009.

Rodriguez was stunned to find that his testimony was among those marked “restricted,” and thus inaccessible to the public. His crucial evidence remains restricted to this day.

Waking Up

Naturally, Rodriguez was flabbergasted by the Commission’s clearly suspect actions, but anger at the subterfuge was soon eclipsed by his far deeper anxiety.

The bombs.

He was convinced beyond a doubt there were explosives planted within the Towers. The official explanation—jet fuel, which is simply kerosene—made no sense at all.

Besides, he had overheard many exchanges on firemen’s two-way radios that day that confirmed virtually all the jet fuel had burned off, and the few remaining scattered fires looked like they could easily be knocked out.

He was convinced the explosions he had seen, felt, and heard that day were not caused by kerosene.

They were caused by deliberately positioned explosives.

What cemented his belief and reinforced it even further was something he saw on television the next day:

WTC building 7 collapsing into its footprint like a house of cards. In a matter of seconds. [1]

He had walked by that building numerous times. WTC7 was a 47-storey steel-framed skyscraper that was located a few hundred feet away from the Towers, and a plane had not even struck it. But, just like the Twin Towers, it, too, it suddenly collapsed into its own footprint.

The first thought that struck him was, “That building was a fortress. How could it just have fallen like that?”

Having experienced the explosions in the North Tower firsthand, and then having seen footage of Building 7 collapse in freefall, there were no doubts whatsoever left in his mind:

All three buildings were purposely demolished with explosives.

[NB: In regard to WTC7, the 9/11 Commission Report, again, mentioned absolutely nothing about this 47-storey skyscraper’s sudden and unbelievable collapse. Nor did it mention a word about the numerous eyewitness accounts of multiple explosions within that building. Not one word. It was completely ignored.]

As to who might have planted the explosives, he was at a loss. He couldn’t conceive how the alleged terrorists could have pulled it off; they couldn’t possibly have gained access to these buildings. He was convinced there had to have been other players involved—insiders.

He found such a prospect not only ominous in the extreme, but also disorienting and confusing on many levels. Suddenly, nothing seemed to make sense. Only one thought consumed him.

Who were the killers?

Strange Recollections

Having worked at the WTC for close upon two decades, he obviously was very familiar with its general layout. The North Tower, in particular, was nigh a second home to him. An extremely affable fellow, Rodriguez had many friends in the WTC community. His days almost invariably began with breakfast with co-workers at the employees’ cafeteria at Windows On The World, the elegant restaurant on the 107th floor.

Especially following the 1993 bombing, security in the towers was extremely tight. That was glaringly obvious wherever he went. So how did the culprits manage to gain access?

He started to look into the security company in charge of the WTC complex, Securacom, and was more than a little surprised by the identities of two of its top executives.

President George W. Bush’s brother Marvin Bush and his cousin, Wirt Walker III, were both principals of the company. Further, he found this very same company was in charge of security at Dulles airport and United Airlines—both central to the attacks.

Brushing this curious connection aside as coincidence, he began to wonder about the practical difficulties the perpetrators would have encountered in gaining access to the buildings. He tried to recall having seen any suspicious people, or strange occurrences.

Pieces began to slowly come together.

He recalled seeing small teams of men in white “HazMat” coveralls busily moving about the building in the weeks preceding the attacks. Their presence didn’t strike him as particularly odd at the time, except for the fact that they used the stairwells almost exclusively and avoided using the service elevators. But he now began to wonder about these men’s real identities and true purpose.

One particularly bizarre incident snapped into focus, one that was so frightening he recalls it made his “hair stand up.”

A few weeks prior to the attacks, he was working in a stairwell on the 34th floor, which he knew to be completely vacant. Suddenly, he heard the strangest sound—one he’d never heard inside the tower in his nearly twenty years there.

It was a powerful, ominous, “rumbling” sound of something extremely heavy being rolled about. It sounded like a “huge metal dumpster on steel wheels, containing something extremely heavy—tons—being rolled around” a floor that he knew to have been totally empty—devoid even of furniture.

Yet, Rodriguez categorically maintains there was “someone” on that floor moving some monstrous contraption about.

Oddly, he admits to having been gripped by intense fear at the time, but he was having difficulty verbalizing to me the exact nature of his apprehension. While this didn’t strike me as having been a particularly inauspicious occurrence, it was clear he had been deeply affected by it. He immediately reported the incident to the main office, but was reassured it was a vacant floor.

Rodriguez was emphatic that he felt so frightened by this incident he didn’t dare open the door to look inside because he literally feared for his life.

He intuitively sensed grave danger behind that door, and did his best to avoid the 34th floor thereafter.

[NB: It is worth considering that long-term occupancy (and thus control) of a whole floor would have granted occupants virtually unlimited and unobstructed access from all sides to the entire 47-column central core of the tower via the elevator shafts. By sequentially disabling individual elevators for ‘servicing,’ the occupants would have had clear access to the entire 1,350-ft central load-bearing core—from the topmost floor right down the 6th level basement sitting on bedrock.]

Willy does not strike me as a man who can be frightened very easily, and this one anecdote has always intrigued me. The emotions I saw in his eyes, and his body language as he was describing the event were real. I was left with no doubt that what he experienced that day was extremely frightening and deeply impressionable.

Man on a Mission

I first met Willy in 2004 when he was touring the country with millionaire philanthropist Jimmy Walter. Walter had recently awoken to 9/11 truth, and was an indomitable firebrand.

Frenziedly mass-producing DVDs, organizing public events and seminars, and doing everything he possibly could to get the message out to the world, he was a one-man tour de force on his own mission of truth.

Such was his fervor, he once even stood in lone protest outside the White House bearing a placard that read, “9/11 was an inside job.” I recall being greatly impressed by the spectacle of such a wealthy, successful man willingly facing scorn and ridicule by going that far out on a limb in the service of a cause as incendiary as 9/11. Quite a guy, Jimmy.

Walter, seeing in Rodriguez the clear mark of authenticity, drive, and commitment, soon took Willy under his wing. Once the two teamed up, Rodriguez was telling his extraordinary story at various public gatherings that Walter was helping organize.

Willy had been “advised” by officials to keep to himself his “different” views on the events of that day, but that wasn’t about to stop him. His deeply traumatic experience and the shocking anomalies he had witnessed simply would not allow him to keep from asking the kind of questions most found exceedingly “uncomfortable”—even outrageously ‘unpatriotic.’

Dalliance with Politics

The White House ceremony had all but guaranteed his meteoric rise to stardom as a national hero. However, his newfound celebrity status would soon have its concomitant obligations.

More than a few high-ranking officials had advised him of the “sensitivity” of the times, and told him in no uncertain terms that it would be unwise for him to pursue his disquieting inquiries into “unfounded theories.”.

It was proving to be “very embarrassing.”

Ironically, at the same time, there was also tremendous support and encouragement being lavished by these very same officials, soliciting his participation on an altogether different agenda: To promote “patriotic unity” and emphasize to the nation the dire need for America to strike back hard at the ‘enemy.’

And things actually got rather intoxicating for a while.

Rodriguez the hero was soon inveigled with promises of political office in the Hispanic community, and carrots of all kinds were dangled before him.

He found the attempts to win him over by various Republican power-players to be almost overwhelming. The heady publicity had suddenly thrust him on the national stage, and he was deemed by Party strategists to be the ideal Republican candidate to woo the more than 30 million Hispanic voters in the country.

Charismatic, articulate, good-looking, fluently bi-lingual and a national hero to boot, he was a natural—the perfect political candidate.

Before joining the WTC staff, Rodriguez had worked for ten years as an aide to New York Governor Mario Cuomo, helping organize press conferences for high-level policy-making events, so he even had the basic political training already under his belt. [He also possessed stage panache to boot. An avid amateur magician, he had worked in his younger days as an assistant to The Amazing Randi.]

The Republican Party even made arrangements to send him to train for political office, and offered Rodriguez millions of dollars in campaign financing to run on the national Hispanic platform. For a brief while he was a rising star with stellar prospects.

But this titillating new potential career also carried with it a huge price—one, he soon discovered, that was in tension with his probity, and sense of righteousness and duty.

It didn’t take him long to decide. He refused to be seduced into concealing a truth he believed the world absolutely needed to know.

There was no doubt in Rodriguez’s mind that the official narrative re 9/11 was far from true. He believed it was his patriotic duty to alert his fellow Americans to what actually happened that terrible day. “I had to choose whether to tell the truth, or play their game,” he told me. “I couldn’t get myself to play their game.”

Tempting as the alternatives were, the forces of truth had prevailed.

Celebrity No More

That pivotal decision caused all Republican encouragement and offers of political support to evaporate.

The decorated 9/11 hero was now quite suddenly not only a Party pariah, but also persona non grata in the halls of high power.

By taking his courageous stand, Rodriguez had unwittingly assumed a very dangerous role, one that would pose a direct threat to powers that lay behind the veneer of party politics.

He had just signed his own political death warrant.

Naturally, the muzzled media didn’t appear willing to report any of what Rodriguez had to say. As always, they felt obliged to promote whatever the propaganda ministry wanted the masses to believe.

It takes enormous courage to go against such opposition, but that’s the kind of man Willy is. He says he owes it to his many friends—more than two hundred of them—who were butchered that day by an evil shadowy group in pursuit of some diabolical geopolitical agenda.

Shocked, inconsolable and deeply disturbed to this day, he continues his campaign with extraordinary energy and an admirable sense of purpose.

When I suggested it might be time for him to throttle back a notch, he responded, “I can’t. I am driven because I have a need to find out who the real killers are. The alleged Arab hijackers couldn’t possibly have rigged all those explosives. No way.”

The Mission Goes Global

Jimmy Walter wasted no time financing a “9/11 Truth World Tour” to raise awareness about the 9/11 fraud by first taking the message across America and later around the world.

And money was no object. Not one to approach such a grand and noble undertaking with anything less that total commitment, Walter famously offered a $1 million cash reward to any engineer or scientist in the world who could prove, in an academic technical paper, that the three towers could have collapsed the way they did without explosives.

Despite massive national publicity—the million-dollar challenge was even sent to the engineering faculties of over 100 universities, as well as a host of major architectural and structural engineering firms—there were no takers.

None. Zero. The prize remains unclaimed to this day. [But is this surprising? How does one prove water isn’t wet?]

Walter’s group was comprised of a team of world-class experts: architects, engineers, pilots, firefighters, metallurgists, chemists, and psychologists, among others [2]. The group made a slew of public presentations in major cities across the US before moving on to Europe, and later, Venezuela, Singapore, Japan and elsewhere speaking to packed audiences everywhere they traveled.

Walter and Rodriguez even made private presentations to former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad and Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. They were surprised to find both these leaders were more than a little knowledgeable about the cover-up.

Willy told me that the home of Nicolas Maduro, president of the Venezuelan Assembly, was brimming with books, videos and documents about the 9/11 cover-up. Maduro, Venezuela’s top legislator, intoned that he was ready to create an international investigative committee to look into the “international crime scene” that is 9/11, and that this would be structured via Chavez’s government.

Walter and Rodriguez also appeared on every major Venezuelan television and radio station, both private and state-owned, and gave presentations to several universities. They were also scheduled to appear on Chavez’s weekly broadcast ‘Alo Presidente’, but this was canceled at the last minute for unspecified reasons.

And things evidently got quite dicey during their trip. Rodriguez discovered that undercover FBI agents on the ground in Venezuela had asked the hotel where he and Walter were staying to turn over a list of names of residents. On hearing this, the Venezuelan National Assembly provided both men armed military protection for the entirety of their trip.

A Sudden Serious Setback

All of these valiant efforts by these two incredibly courageous men eventually amounted to naught. Quite unexpectedly, and inexplicably, all the energy, enthusiasm and momentum they had amassed suddenly appeared to have hit a brick wall.

They were informed, rather sheepishly by cohorts of the two leaders, that 9/11 was simply too big an issue to “rush into,” and that it would be advisable to postpone further action to allow time for “more research.”

Such is the awesome fear-inspiring power and global reach of the amorphous perpetrators of this monstrous crime.

Eventually, in utter frustration at his inability to make any real headway after over three years of tireless effort and colossal expense, and hampered by poor health, Jimmy Walter finally decided to call it a day.

That little adventure had cost Walter over $6 million of his personal money.

Jimmy’s parting words to me, in 2007, embodied a truth that continues to resonate and gain currency as the years roll by:

“Trying to outdo the mainstream media by throwing a few million bucks around is like trying to outshine the sun with a flashgun.”

It’s hardly surprising you’ve heard nothing about these men’s heroic initiatives on the local evening “news”—little more than bread and circuses, artfully packaged and insidiously seeded for consumption by the gullible, clueless masses.

Witnesses Begin to Drop Dead

It wasn’t long afterwards that Rodriguez got his next wake-up call. Kenny Johanneman, another of Willy’s close friends and former WTC colleague, had also been in the basement with him when the bombs were going off.

Willy, now working on behalf of the community of Hispanic victims, survivors and their families, had decided to contact everyone he knew who had been present at the WTC that day so he could record their personal experiences on video.

During a lengthy interview, Johanneman recounted his experience in great detail, holding back nothing. Johanneman, who had made it his personal mission to tell everyone he knew—and anyone else who’d listen—that he had seen “floors blow up in the basement before the plane hit,” appeared extremely eager (almost nervously so, Willy now recalls) to get his story on tape.

Three days after the interview, Rodriguez received the bad news.

Kenny Johanneman had suddenly “committed suicide.” Gunshot to the head.

This is frighteningly reminiscent of Barry Jennings, the former New York Housing Authority Emergency Coordinator and key 9/11 witness who suddenly died of unknown causes days before the release of NIST’s “amended” report on the collapse of WTC7.

Jennings is on record [3] stating, unequivocally and emphatically regarding Building 7, that “explosions were going off all over the place”—while the Twin Towers were still standing!

Jennings also stated during an interview that he was “stepping over bodies” in the main lobby of WTC7 as he was being led out by firemen. The lobby, he testified on video, “looked like a bomb had gone off inside it.”

Not only had no aircraft hit this building, the Twin Towers were still standing.

[NB: This is virtually identical to John Mongello’s testimony about elevators exploding in the South Tower before a plane even hit the building.]

Mr. Jennings, too, suffered a sudden and mysterious death at age 53.

Dylan Avery, a documentary producer, commissioned a private detective to investigate Jennings’ suspicious death (and the subsequent disappearance of his wife and two children). Within days the man returned Avery’s’s check to him and, giving no reason, refused to continue with the case.

The latest casualty in the long line of 9/11 expert witnesses to die under suspicious circumstances was Dutch demolition expert Danny Jawenko, president of Exposieve Demolitie BV, a leading Dutch controlled demolition company.

Having watched a video of WTC Building 7 suddenly fall at freefall speed, Mr. Jawenko had the courage to stand up and authoritatively assert [4] that he was “absolutely positive” WTC7 was brought down by controlled demolition.

On July 18, 2011, while driving home alone in his own car, Mr. Jawenko’s vehicle suddenly accelerated, swerved off the road and crashed into a tree at high speed.

Danny Jawenko was killed instantly.

The Mission Ratchets Up

During Rodriguez’s long crusade, he also contacted the FBI, but they never followed up on his reports. [It’s almost certain they did, but were probably allowed to take it only so far.] The same holds true with the mainstream media.

CNN spent a day interviewing Rodriguez at his home, but when it was broadcast the following day it had been thoroughly edited: they glamorized the heroic rescues and the White House tamasha, of course, but wholly excised anything pertaining to the explosions. It was a total whitewash.

Some reporters have subtly warned Rodriguez to keep quiet, as his outspokenness could jeopardize his life. “You don’t know whom you’re dealing with,” one major-network insider told him. But Willy had already defiantly looked death in the face and will probably continue to tell his story, damn the torpedoes.

He says he is speaking for his friends who were forever rendered speechless, and adds, “I am living on borrowed time; I probably should be dead anyway.”

It’s probably this do-or-die attitude that has imbued Rodriguez with the guts to take his dauntless campaign as far as he has.

How gutsy is he, and how far is he willing to go?

In 2004 Rodriguez was the lead plaintiff in a RICO lawsuit filed against President George W. Bush and 155 of his henchmen, accusing them of complicity in the 9/11 attacks, conspiracy to commit murder and other crimes.

This is hardly the behavior of a man afraid of getting whacked.

But don’t hold your breath waiting for a sensational courthouse drama with Dubya sweating it out in the hot seat. The court dismissed Rodriguez’s claims against the USA, DHS, and FEMA, and gave Rodriguez until July 7, 2006 to show cause why his lawsuit should not be dismissed with respect to the other 153 defendants. Due to a falling out with his attorney Rodriguez failed to do so, and the court dismissed the case.

But he’d be the first to tell you this was never about winning.

It was about getting the public to wake up to the facts about 9/11—the single most heinous crime and unconscionable fraud ever foisted on the inhabitants of this planet.

Preparing For The 10th Anniversary

The 9/11 Truth movement is growing almost exponentially, with literally hundreds of groups active worldwide, and more blossoming by the day.

But this took a few years to get going.

So utterly overwhelming was the initial mainstream propaganda barrage, and so raw were people’s emotions and sensitivities in the aftermath of the attacks, those who were quick to see through the fraud couldn’t even begin to think of organizing a handful of local activists, let alone a worldwide network.

Gradually—and thanks almost entirely to the Internet—lines of communication began to open across the country and around the world, helping activists to organize, communicate, build cohesion, and spread the word to the millions still asleep.

It was only a matter of time before people would become aware of the mountains of shockingly obvious evidence that’s freely available online—such as WTC7 in freefall. Common sense would then inevitably kick in and take over, helping them to pierce the veil of the official myth on their own. There is, after all, a limit to denial.

As a result of the steadfast efforts of thousand of dedicated activists, what began as a trickle is now fast reaching torrential proportions.

Reaching critical mass is no longer a distant hope. Especially given the millions waking up around the world to 9/11’s offspring—the bogus ‘war on terror’, DHS, the militarized police state, the monumental Bankster fraud—critical mass re 9/11 is now imminent, and an absolute certainty.

Thousands of activists around the world are helping spread the 9/11 message via public presentations, free DVDs, and even huge highway billboards.

All too aware of the astonishing rise in public awareness, desperate operations are currently afoot by the ‘powers that be’ to counter this worrisome trend.

Major Hollywood stars—including Robert DeNiro—have been signed up to read the fairytale script pushing the ‘Official Conspiracy Theory.’ I.e., how nineteen clueless Arabs who, without tickets or boarding passes, climbed aboard four airliners, hijacked the craft using little box-cutters, and then brilliantly outwitted the most formidable military force on the planet and its entire multi-trillion-dollar defense apparatus for almost two hours—all without a single fighter interceptor in the fearsome American arsenal so much as turning a wheel for the entire duration.

This upcoming mass-media pageant, of course, will be further bolstered by the government’s openly proclaimed—and ongoing—assault on 9/11 “conspiracy” groups.

Obama’s regulatory Czar, Cass Sunstein, has officially initiated a nakedly aggressive program of “cognitive infiltration,’ an insidious initiative where government agent provocateurs have been ordered to covertly penetrate 9/11 truth movements and attempt to structurally disable these organizations from within by sowing disinformation.

One can only wonder why this kind of deep sabotage would be necessary—unless these “conspiracy nuts” now poses a real and present danger to the powers that be.

But, take heart, dear reader: although truth lives a wretched life, it outlives a lie every time.

Every time.

Besides, it would take a lot more than a covert program of “cognitive infiltration”’ to dismantle 9/11 truth—that would first require rewriting the laws of physics.

On the side of Truth, we have literally thousands of professional architects, engineers, firefighters, pilots, scientists, and other similar groups comprised of professionals with impeccable credentials who are planning their own public relations initiatives.

But, in a country where 78% of its citizens get 92% of their news from television, these groups have their work cut out for them.

Despite the challenges that lie ahead, I cannot bring myself to agree with Jimmy Walter’s assessment that this would be an undertaking tantamount to “trying to outshine the sun with a flashgun.”

Rather, I would prefer to invoke the wisdom of Victor Hugo:

“No army can stop an idea whose time has come.”

The Power Of One

Meanwhile, there is one brave man packing a ‘flashgun’ who’s working wonders on his own. And he dismisses defeat as an impossibility.

I was elated to discover that Willy Rodriguez’s undiminished efforts are still in full swing, and about to reap rich rewards.

The man is on fire. He’s been reeling off interviews with major media outlets around the world at a ferocious rate, gearing up for a full-blown one-man 10th anniversary assault on the Dark Force.

Rodriguez recently mentioned some of the interviews he already has in the bag:

Yomiuri Shinbun (Japan), Arbitron (worldwide), Shanghai Morning Post (China), Express News (Pakistan), Global National News (Canada), Telemondo (Latin America), Le Point (France), RT (Russia), Radio Televicion Espanola (Spain), Reuters, and CNN (again). There are many more in the works that will be ready by 9/11/12.

[NB: Willy was quick to mention he’d learnt a bitter lesson from his last encounter with CNN—now, he rattles off his responses as seamlessly as possible to deny cutting-room butchers their “edit points!”]

Rodriguez is also polishing up a brilliant new documentary all his own, “From The Rubble,” which will also be released in time for the 10th anniversary. I watched the raw version last evening in its entirety.

It’s a brilliant bit of work—profoundly emotive, incredibly detailed, fact-filled and chockablock with riveting interviews with WTC employees, firemen, police officers, paramedics and other first-responders. These are all rescuers who were there, hands-on, in the thick of it, and witnessed the entire tragedy firsthand.

Even in its current rough state, I can unreservedly state it’s the most compelling 9/11 documentary I’ve seen to date.

Time To Give It Our All

Given the appalling trail of deaths of 9/11 witnesses over the past ten years, it would make sense that the best way to ensure the safety of surviving key witnesses like Rodriguez would, ironically, be for these individuals to continue to stay planted in the public spotlight.

Considering the serious threat these brave souls pose to the criminals at large, this might be the only strategy that could offer them a modicum of safety.

The more people who know about this brave man, and the many other men and women like him, the greater the chances of thwarting their ‘suicides’ or ‘heart attacks.’

On behalf of every one in the 9/11 Truth movement; in memory of the three thousand Americans who perished needlessly on that tragic day; and the million-plus innocents who have been slaughtered (and continue to be massacred) in distant lands on account of this fiendish fraud; it would be fitting, proper, and necessary to conclude with a message to all those who have awoken to The Big Lie, yet choose to do nothing:

Silence is complicity.

Notes:

[1] www.youtube.com/watch?v=LD06SAf0p9A (Building 7)

[2] www.ae911truth.org/ (Architects & Engineers)
patriotsquestion911.com/ (Military Leaders)
pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/ (Pilots)
firefightersfor911truth.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=4282 (Firefighters)
scientistsfor911truth.org/ (Scientists)

[3] www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRaKHq2dfCI (Barry Jennings Interview)

[4] www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMhUTrBODtA {Danny Jawenko Interview)

World History and the Bosnian Pyramids

2012-01-27T14:17:00.000-08:00

World History and the Bosnian Pyramids

By wmw_admin on January 23, 2012

Sam Semir Osmanagich Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences Professor of Anthropology at the American University in Bosnia-Herzegovina – November 2011

1. PREHISTORIC AND ANCIENT HUMAN SOCIETIES

Almost everything they teach us about the ancient history is wrong: origin of men, civilizations and pyramids. Homo sapiens sapiens is not a result of the evolution and biologists will never find a “missing link”, because the intelligent man is product of genetic engineering. Sumerians are not the beginning of the civilized men, but rather beginning of another cycle of humanity. And finally, original pyramids, most superior and oldest, were made by advanced builders who knew energy, astronomy and construction better than we do.

In order to understand the ancient monuments, we need to view them through three realms: physical, energy and spiritual. Our scientific instruments are simply not enough to explain the purpose of oldest pyramids, for example. Mainstream scientists, archaeologists, historians and anthropologists, are often main obstacle for scientific progress.

Gap between physical and spiritual science is to be bridged if we want to get fully understanding of the past.

Twelve hundred ton stone block in Baalbeck (Lebanon) needs explanation. Who was able to shape, move and install four times bigger blocks than our, 21st century, capabilities? Yonaguni megalithic monuments (Japan) do belong to the previous cycle of humanity. They are undeniable proof, on the bottom of the Pacific floor, 80 meters below the ocean level, that advanced culture lived in the area more than 12.000 years ago before huge quantities of ice melted and caused Pacific level to rise for 80 meters. Machu Picchu (Peru) tells the story of four distinctive civilizations and different construction styles, first civilization being the most advanced. At the same time, all the history books make up story of Inkas being the builders of “royal retreat” in the recent times. New dating of Peruvian, Mexican, Chinese and Egyptian pyramids will take us back much before recognized history and known rulers.

Oldest Chinese and Egyptian pyramids are much superior to those made later, as unsuccessful replicas. Older are built from granite and sandstone blocks, more recent ones are much smaller built from bricks and mud. Traces of more advanced beings are everywhere around us. In the meantime, mainstream scientists try to fit those monuments into their time coordinates, falsifying the truth.

Two hundred Cahokia pyramids show astronomical knowledge of the builders who moved several millions tons of construction materials and who knew the difference between cosmic and magnetic north. Mayan world is an example of the knowledge of Universe. Our Solar system circles Milky Way and that 26-thousand years cycle (“long count calendar”) affect all living life on our Planet. Anasazies, ancestors of Pueblo Indians, didn’t need alphabet or physical communication means to recognize danger in different dimensions coming from the depth of Universe.

As long as they stay within the box, mainstream archaeologists will never be able to explain tooling and logistic needed to build stone heads on Easter Islands, shape granite blocks of Akapana pyramid complex in Bolivia or create chambers of Giza pyramids.

Stone spheres of western Mexico, southern Costa Rica, Easter Island or twenty locations in remote Bosnia-Herzegovina, are obvious proof of understanding and manipulating of shapes and energy in the distant past.

On top of all that, discovery of the Bosnian Valley of the Pyramids is telling us that we don’t know our Planet. We might go to the Moon (temporarily, until threaten), but we still need to explore our Mother Earth. More secrets wait to be uncovered and, with the ancient knowledge, help us reach our balance back.

2. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE BOSNIAN PYRAMID DISCOVERIES

In April 2005 I first traveled to the town of Visoko, 20 miles northwest from Sarajevo, the capital of Bosnia-Herzegovina. My attention was caught by two regularly shaped hills, which I later named the Bosnian Pyramids of the Sun and Moon. For thousands of years locals have considered those hills to be natural phenomena because they were covered by soil and vegetation. However, when I first saw their triangular faces, obvious corners and orientation toward the cardinal points, I knew that they had to be constructed by a force other than nature. Since I had been investigating pyramids for decades I knew that the pyramids found in China, Mexico, Guatemala and El Salvador had the same type of soil and vegetation coverage.

In 2005 work was begun on this project and construction companies and geologists were paid (out of my pocket) to do core drilling and geo-morphological analysis. We then announced to the world, at the press conference, that the first pyramids in Europe had been discovered.

Shortly thereafter we established the non-profit Archaeological Park: Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun Foundation and since that time the pyramid investigations in Bosnia have become the world’s largest inter-disciplinary archaeological project. We have spent over 340.000 man-hours in archaeological excavation, sample testing and radiocarbon dating in the period from 2005 to 2011. We determined that the Bosnian Valley of the Pyramids consists of five pyramids discovered to date which I named: The Bosnian Pyramids of the Sun, Moon, Dragon, Mother Earth and Love. The site also includes a tumulus complex and a huge underground labyrinth.

This discovery is historic and changes the knowledge of the early history of Europe for several reasons:

1. These are the first pyramids discovered in Europe

2. The site includes the largest pyramid structure in the world—The Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun with its height of over 220 meters is much higher than the Great Pyramid of Egypt (147 meters).

3. The Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun has, according to the Bosnian Institute for Geodesy, the most precise orientation towards cosmic north with the error of 0 degrees, 0 minutes and 12 seconds.

4. The Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun is completely covered by rectangular concrete blocks. The properties of the concrete, including extreme hardness (up to 133 MPs) and low water absorption (around 1%), are, according to the scientific institutions in Bosnia, Italy and France, far superior to modern concrete materials.

5. The pyramids are covered by soil which is, according to the State Institute for Agro-pedology, approx. 12,000 years old. Radiocarbon dating from the paved terrace on Bosnian Pyramid of the Moon, performed by Institute of Physics of Silesian Institute of Technology from Gliwice (Poland) confirmed that terrace was built 10.350 years ago (+/- 50 years). These finding confirm that the Bosnian pyramids are also the oldest known pyramids on the planet.

6. Beneath the Bosnian Valley of the Pyramids there is an extensive underground tunnel and chamber network which runs for a total of more than ten miles.

7. Ceramic sculptures have been discovered in the underground labyrinth with a mass of up to 20,000 pounds which makes them the largest found so far from the ancient world.

The list of the wonders in Bosnian archaeology does not end here. In the vicinity, we discovered the tallest tumulus in the World: 61 meter high. Its nearest competitor, Sillbury Hill in England is 60 meters high. The Bosnian tumulus consists of two-layer megalithic terraces, clay layers and artificial concrete layers.

A team of physicists detected an energy beam coming through the top of the Bosnian Pyramid of the Sun. The radius of the beam is 4.5 meters with a frequency of 28 kHz. The beam is continuous and its strength grows as it moves up and away from the pyramid. This phenomenon contradicts the known laws of physic and technology. This is the first proof of non-herzian technology on the Planet. It seems that the pyramid-builders created a perpetual motion machine a long time ago and this “energy machine” is still working.

In the underground labyrinth, in 2010, we discovered three chambers and a small blue lake. Energy screening shows that the ionization level is 43 times higher than the average concentration outside which makes the underground chambers into “healing rooms”.

Further electromagnetic detection in 2011 confirmed that levels of negative radiation through the Hartman, Curry and Schneider grids are equal to zero in the tunnels. There was no technical radiation (from power lines and/or other technology) found in the tunnels and no cosmic radioactivity. Ceramic sculptures are positioned over the underground water flows and the negative energy is transformed into positive. All of these experiments point to the underground labyrinth as one of the most secure underground constructions in the world and this makes it an ideal place for the body’s rejuvenation and regeneration.

Two hundred years of Egyptology has not produced a satisfactory answer to the question of what the real purpose was for the oldest and most superior pyramids.

In only six years, our research in Bosnia has applied inter-disciplinary scientific methods, to look at this complex through the physical, energetic and spiritual dimensions. We have had pioneering results which affects the entire sphere of knowledge and Pyramid Science. Our history is changing with each new discovery.

Perhaps by changing our beginnings or learning to better understand our beginnings we can also change our present and our future for the better.

War for Total Control: Planning the Ultimate ‘Big Brother’ Surveillance Society

2012-01-27T14:11:00.000-08:00

War for Total Control: Planning the Ultimate ‘Big Brother’ Surveillance Society

By wmw_admin on January 27, 2012

By ADRIAN SALBUCHI – via New Dawn Magazine

It’s an old cliché to say that technology in itself is neither good nor bad, but that all depends on how you use it. In the case of Information and Communications Technologies, and their out-of-control problem child the Internet that has so revolutionised the world, today we seem to be at a key crossroads where all seems to hang on which path Mankind finally treads.

Like a sharp two-edged sword, the Internet and the very rapidly evolving technologies surrounding it, are poised to either usher in a new era of intellectual, cultural and spiritual enlightenment, material well-being and true cooperation amongst nations bent on resolving common global problems; or we may be about to fall into a black abyss of absolute totalitarian control; intellectual, physical and spiritual violence; and mass slavery on an unprecedented scale.

How to resolve this dilemma? We should certainly start by understanding three key issues: who really controls these technologies, what are their medium and long term objectives, why are they being used the way they are…

The Invisible Man

One of the greatest perils we face today is the difficulty in properly identifying and distinguishing friend from foe; it is increasingly difficult to understand who – even what – the enemy or adversary is which means that society’s key vulnerability stems from its incapacity to properly identify risk, peril and danger. If you cannot see a danger approaching, it will hit you by surprise as the look-out on the Titanic so painfully learned on that fateful night in April 1912.

A vital factor for the survival and prosperity of individuals, families, communities, organisations – even entire nations – lies in properly identifying friends and enemies (or at least adversaries). There is always an “enemy” out there who either wants to have what we own, or wants to place us in his or her service, or may have a myriad of reasons for wanting to somehow weaken or get rid of us, mostly because they want to take for free something that is ours. Some will say this is basic human nature; others that it’s the Darwinian imperative of the survival of the fittest; still others will complain that it’s man’s criminal egotism. Whatever your view, the truth is that in one way or another we all live immersed in “self-protection or defense mode” which begins every morning when we close and lock our front door.

What I mean to say is that self-protection or defense is easy when you can clearly identify and understand your enemy: whether thieves at large on our streets, or foreign powers bent on subduing or colonising us. Here is where modern European languages play us a bad trick, because we use the word “enemy” with far too wide a scope. In fact, we would do well to heed the recommendations of German Jurist Carl Schmitt (1888-1985) who, like the Romans, differentiated between Inimicus (i.e., your own personal enemy whom you might hate for having done you some wrong but who is your own private affair and problem) and Hostis (i.e., a public enemy of the community and State, whom we might not necessarily dislike but who poses a threat to all and must thus be combated).

For example, two hundred years ago, it was easy for the thirteen original colonies of North America to identify as its Hostis the British Crown in London, or for the South American Viceroyalties to identify as their Hostis the Spanish Court in Madrid. A common, visible, credible enemy makes strategic planning that much simpler, for we know who he is, where he is, what he wants, and how he achieves his objectives.

Today’s challenge, however, is far greater because Hostis – the common enemy – is no longer easy to identify. We can no longer simply say “it’s the Brit’s over in London” or “it’s the Reds” or “the Nazis” or “the Japs.” Today, Mankind’s Hostis has become all too complex, often subtle and defying simple identification whether by nation, creed, race, geography, language, or any other easy-to-perceive characteristics. Today’s Hostis is everywhere and nowhere; which requires we refine our search, identifying him more by his tell-tale signs, fingerprints, “DNA” so-to-speak, than by directly perceiving him (or her).

No longer can national leaders rally mass popular support to “fight the Soviets or the Germans, or the Japanese.” A decade ago, they had to resort to weaker abstractions like the Bushian “war on terrorism,” which is meaningless until you actually define what “terrorism” is.1

What we have today is basically a public invisible enemy that is very difficult to specifically pinpoint, but the effects of whose actions we all increasingly suffer everywhere. Perhaps “Global Power Elite” is the closest we can come to describing this veritable global enemy whose planetary interests and objectives for the most part run counter to the common interests of “We the People” everywhere, and yet that too is still quite abstract and faceless.

Nevertheless, and like all “invisible men,” whilst we cannot “see” the enemy we can certainly feel the effects of his actions and can thus certainly learn to trace his tracks, infer where he is now, where he’s going and what he plans to do.

In this world war, all aware citizens need to become hunters of sorts: fighting the Global Power Elite is much like tracking down a dangerous wild tiger in the forest… An experienced, shrewd and watchful hunter does not need to actually see the tiger to know that he’s close by, if he knows how to identify and understand specific tell-tale ‘tiger marks’: here, some broken twigs on a forest path; there, a dead rodent; perhaps tiger droppings by a tree or paw marks on damp soil; a specific scent, or hushed growling echoing in the distance…

A similar task faces us if we are to become free and independent: we must learn and understand who, where and what is the enemy and its weapons of war. We can certainly say that technological research, development and control are among its array of armaments. If we understand the enemy, it should not be all that hard to understand what he will do with the technology so “generously” given to Mankind.

Putting on the Chains of Slavery

A century ago, Soviet revolutionary Vladimir Lenin said capitalists would one day sell to the communists the very ropes with which communism would hang them. Well, not quite actually as it ended up being the other way around with communists hanging themselves with the invisible “ropes of capitalism,” enthralled as they became at the end of the Bi-Polar world with the West’s mass consumerism. An eloquent snapshot of which right after the Berlin Wall fell in 1989 was a little ticky-tacky East German “Trabant” next to a powerful West German Mercedes-Benz. Indeed, a picture that was worth 1,000 words!

22 years later, something similar seems to be happening; only this time it’s the Global Power Elite enthralling us with invisible technological ropes with which millions of people are about to hang themselves, in a figurative sense, of course. Not that all of us are doing that yet, but when you look around at the growing mass population control, the noose is certainly being fitted snugly around our necks.

Humans needs time to adapt and cope with major changes. Through tens of thousands of years of history, change took place very slowly, spanning entire generations so that with each new change, social structures slowly adapted. Today, however, with the explosive advent of information technologies, telecommunications and genetics to name but a few, we’re all mesmerised and desirous to become part of the Info Cybersphere. We’ve been persuaded that we really do need to have the latest cell phones, iPod, iPad, the Internet and cable/satellite TV, iPhone and Blackberry, which potentially is a good thing, but they must be approached with discriminating caution. For they represent a two-edged sword that can either help expand our consciousness and awareness of the world around us in every sense of the word, or they can chain us unwittingly into a macro-system that has grown into a Leviathan with huge capacity to control every detail of our lives.

I am a layman so I won’t delve into the technicalities of today’s information technologies because others are far more qualified to do that, but I can tell you this: all these technologies are not as innocent as they would have us believe: i.e., so “innocent” that 5, 6 or 7 year olds can be set loose to play with video games and the Internet as if they were mere toys. Not so! These technologies must be approached with at least as much caution, prevention and awe as we do when we drive our car, knowing that just as it can safely take as wherever we want to go, if we thoughtlessly rev the engine up to 250 kmph, it can also get us and others killed.

Similarly, this two-edged sword can serve to vanquish the Global Power Elite by making us aware of their intentions and their terrible medium and long-term consequences, or it can serve them to cut our throats. In fact, this Janus-headed monster lies equidistant between them and us. Objectively, either they win and we lose, which means the world will be run by machines that they control or, we use these technologies to rally the overwhelming power of We the People, to annihilate the Global Power Elite. Where does the difference lie? In our awareness.

The Global Power Elite know full well what they are doing whilst most people don’t, and they will do everything in their power to keep it that way. Here, then, are two global armies pitted against each other. “In this corner…” a tiny but extremely powerful elite controlling a huge machine to their benefit and our enslavement. “In that corner…”, gigantic masses of mostly unaware people using that same machine but without understanding it, nor realising what it’s really being used for.

It is today so embedded into society that, increasingly, every aspect of our lives are controlled by it: whether it be work done on the Internet, Intranets, E-Trade, managing your bank account, reserving your next flight and printing your boarding pass, doing research and fact-finding, or just plain entertainment and whiling the time away. It’s a coin of which we are systematically shown only the “heads” side, i.e., all the benefits, magic, comfort and advantages of being hooked-in and on-line. “Life is so much easier now…” However, we’re not shown the “tail” side that poses a dark and lurking danger: Total Control. The Info Cybersphere represents a super-structure for total control against which individuals can do little to escape from, unless awareness dawns on them.

The key weapon wielded against all peoples in every country is PsyWar – Psychological Warfare – that has successfully: (a) incorporated two, maybe three billion people into the IT Cybersphere allowing growing partial/total control over them, and (b) persuaded billions of people to willingly accept this. The rest of Mankind – the other 3 or 4 billion are “useless eaters” as David Rockefeller once called them – just don’t count because they’re too abjectly poor and are not part of any “market”; there’s literally nothing the Corporate Overworld can sell to them. Thus, they are implicitly earmarked for controlled extermination over the next generation through war, disease, starvation, urban violence, environmental contamination, artificially induced “natural” disasters, or by just plain letting them waste away.

A quick look at some of the technological wonders they have in store for us might better illustrate this:

Watch What You Say… and Do… (and Think..!)

“Romas/COIN” is a super hi-tech military civilian mass surveillance and data gathering project supported by US private defense contractors (Northrop Gruman, notably), think tanks, and the US military and civilian intelligence community, with electronic capabilities to monitor and analyse millions and millions of conversations, sort key data and then re-build it to reflect specific behaviour patterns amongst individuals and groups of people, which enables projecting their future plans, whereabouts, goals and actions. This will make “preventive war” and “preventive arrests” that much easier. For now, much of this mass surveillance and data mining targets Arab speaking peoples, not just in the Middle East/North Africa but the world over, which ties in nicely with the endless “global war on terrorism.”

This represents a quantum leap by the Global Power Elite in that until recently such global hi-tech spying was only done by the National Security Agency, CIA, FBI, MI6 or Mossad (which can always be demonised as modern Gestapo-like entities); now however, we have “friendly” household names like Apple, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft, Pixar/Disney, PointAbout, doing all the spying for the Elite. This private corporate network is part of the invisible noose we are putting around our necks.

Big Brother is Watching You…

Countries one normally believes are bastions of liberty and freedom – the UK, Canada, Australia or New Zealand – are prime examples of mass surveillance. Take a stroll through London and a vast and ubiquitous network of several million CCTV cameras will be watching your every move 24/7 in airports, underground and railway stations, street crossings, stores, bus stops, shopping malls, motorways, parks, bridges, condos, public buildings, private offices, utilities, public toilets, toll booths… Wherever you are in London, someone is watching you… very closely. Naturally, all this is done in the name of “national security” which has become a smokescreen for the political and corporate elites’ perception that growing public awareness does pose a real threat to their interests.

In Australia Big Brother is hard at work, not surprising since Australia responded to September 11 with extraordinary law-making. In the ensuing decade, Australia’s Federal Parliament enacted 54 pieces of anti-terrorism legislation; 48 of which were passed under the Howard government, an average of one new anti-terrorism law every seven weeks.

The numbers are striking: Canadian Professor Kent Roach found that “Australia has exceeded the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada in the sheer number of new anti-terrorism laws it has enacted since September 11, 2001. Australia’s hyper-legislation strained the ability of the parliamentary opposition and civil society to keep up, let alone provide effective opposition to, the relentless legislative output.” All brought to you by the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO).

Australia’s legislation includes the Telecommunications Interception and Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Act, and the Intelligence Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2011 that strengthens and increases ASIO’s powers to conduct offshore surveillance and reach such organisations as WikiLeaks, targeting anyone campaigning on political and social issues.

“We know who you are…”

New technologies may also soon make fingerprints a thing of the past. Vein recognition represents a far more precise method to identify you than traditional fingerprint scanners because of its low .001% false acceptance rate. Using light to penetrate a users’ finger to read vein patterns which are unique and thought to be impossible to replicate, this method is fully fool proof as vein structures change after death, which means severed fingers cannot be used to fool the readers.

Then there’s face recognition where Toshiba recently unveiled a new range of LED-backlit televisions for 2011 including the model WL800A that uses facial recognition. Next time you’re surfing the Internet or speaking on Skype, hmmm… “we know who you are, where you are and what you’re doing…”

Lost & Found: “M’am: We found your missing husband’s black box…”

Microchip Implants for personal tracking and ID are getting smaller and smaller, and ever more injectable without you ever even realising it. Next time an Avian or Swine Flu “crisis” breaks, don’t let yourself be coaxed into mass vaccinating your family. Michael G Michael (University of Wollongong’s School of Information Systems and Technology, Australia), has coined the term “uberveillance” to describe the emerging trend of all-encompassing surveillance, explaining that “Uberveillance is not on the outside looking down, but on the inside looking out through a microchip that is embedded in our bodies.”

The US’s private hi-tech company VeriChip (www.positiveidcorp.com) widely markets implantable nano-chips which store a 16-digit unique ID number on humans “for medical and security purposes, focusing on high-risk patients and the need to identify them and their medical records in an emergency.” To allay any fears they also explain they do not know when or if someone will develop an implantable microchip with GPS technology, but that “it is not an application we are pursuing.” Michael explains that such implantable chips will become like a “black box that will then be a witness to our actual movements, words – perhaps even our thoughts – and play a similar role to the black box placed in an aircraft.” He also predicts microchip implants and their infrastructure could eliminate the need for e-passports, e-tags, and secure ID cards, adding that “microchipping… will eventually become compulsory in the context of identification within the frame of national security.” For now, your mobile phone acts as a passive transponder for radio frequency identification (RFID) readers.

Watch the Birdie…

Not surprisingly, military applications are where trillions of ultra hi-tech dollars are going. We now have drones as tiny as bugs. In a recent piece published in The New York Times2 we learn that the US military’s Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio runs a flight lab dubbed a “microaviary” where drones designed to replicate flight mechanics of moths, hawks and other creatures are being developed. “‘We’re looking at how you can hide in plain sight’ said Greg Parker, an Aerospace engineer, as he held up a mechanical hawk that in the future might carry out espionage.” Today, the Pentagon has some 7,000 aerial drones explained Ashton B Carter, the Pentagon’s chief weapons buyer and a member of the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

“In February 2011, researchers unveiled a hummingbird drone built by the firm AeroVironment for the secretive Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) which can fly at 11 mph and perch on a windowsill… one of the smallest drones in use on the battlefield is the three foot long Raven which troops in Afghanistan toss by hand like a model airplane to peer over the next hill.”

Then we have new “Gorgon Stare” technology that can capture live videos of an entire city, but requires 2,000 analysts to process the data feeds from a single drone compared with 19 analysts per drone today. We can also expect massive growth of armies of military surveillance analysts representing “wonderful new job careers in national defense.”

A Nation of Cowards

That same New York Times piece goes on to say, “within the military, no one disputes that drones save American lives. Many see them as advanced versions of ‘stand-off weapons systems’, like tanks or bombs dropped from aircraft, that the US has used for decades. ‘There’s a kind of nostalgia for the way wars used to be,’ said Deane-Peter Baker, an ethics professor at the US Naval Academy, referring to noble notions of knight-on-knight conflict. Drones are part of a post-heroic age, he said, and in his view, it is not always a problem if they lower the threshold for war… Military ethicists concede that drones can turn war into a video game, inflict civilian casualties and with no Americans directly at risk, and thus more easily draw the US into conflicts.”

This ties in with the Powell Doctrine, drafted by Gen. Colin Powell (CFR) after the First Gulf War which states, amongst other concepts, that the US should only engage in military conflict where its overwhelming military clout guarantees complete victory over carefully chosen weaker enemies. That explains why the US (and its staunch ally Britain) will unilaterally attack Afghanistan and Iraq, but not China or Russia; or why the US (and NATO) imposed “regime change” on Libya but not on North Korea (so intimate with China) or Iran (so close to Russia). This explains why America’s “heroic exploits” included invading tiny Grenada under the Reagan Administration in 1984, and unarmed Panama under Bush Senior in 1991, as well as its unflinching support of nuclear-armed-to-the-teeth Israel against rock-throwing Palestinians.

Clearly, a more overt “doctrine” of abject and shameless cowardice has yet to be advanced by any nation. There, no doubt, lie the seeds of America’s coming demise and that of its key allies: they have become greedy and corrupt nations governed by cowardly rulers.

What are You Going to Do?

Whatever happens from now on, Planet Earth depends on how large a portion of the two or three billion “lucky ones” who have voluntarily integrated themselves into the Cybersphere through PC’s, laptops, blackberries, websites, cell phones, etc., become aware of the grave dangers facing us all. How fast they begin taking defensive measures from inside the Cybersphere, especially by identifying and taking advantage of its myriad weak points.

As a friend once said, “if globalisation can be compared to a balloon, then you only need the microscopic point of a sharp pin to blow it up…” Each of us must become such a “microscopic pin.”

As I write, the surveillance and control infrastructure can read this article, plot my location from their satellites using the cell phone in my pocket as a GPS transponder, spy on what I read, write and navigate on my laptop, and God knows what more.

Since 20 years or so, the National Security Agency’s Echelon Project can spy on our phones and emails, targeting specific words used in billions upon billions of messages and texts – “bomb,” “attack,” “Islam,” “Muslim,” “nuclear,” “chemical,” and “biological” are just some of the words and sequences Echelon can snoop into (they’re probably doing this right now as I write and as you read!). Whatever it is they can do today surely exceeds our wildest imagination.

This is no longer just the “national intelligence infrastructure” spanning the CIA, FBI, FEMA, Homeland Security, DARPA, Army, Navy and Air Force Intelligence, and their counterparts in other countries. This now spans private corporations that gather data, organise it, seek and find specific patterns (behaviours, contacts, interests, intents, geographies and infinite others) through which they hope to eventually exert their long-sought dream of total control over populations forming part of their Global System (the rest are as good as dead).

Microsoft, Facebook, Google, and a vast array of intelligence, security, IT, data gathering companies are all linking into increasingly large networks that pool data, findings and capabilities into complex arrays of self-sustaining and evolving structures, that lie outside the visual scope even of governments, for the simple reason that governments cannot even begin to fathom those capabilities, powers and future projections.

Does anybody really believe that Barack Obama, David Cameron, the senators, representatives and MP’s of the US or UK governments have a real clue as to what the NSA, together with Google, together with Boeing, together with Northrop, together with Halliburton, together with Apple, together with Mossad, MI6 and CIA front companies, together with key universities and think tanks, together with…. are reallydeveloping?

Can Congress or Parliament enact more laws to “control” something they themselves cannot understand and, even if they were to enact limiting legislation, by then technology will have evolved even further, easily wiggling its way out of any such laws.

Who’s in Charge?

That brings us to the key question: who’s in charge? Who really runs Australia, Britain, France and Germany? Japan, India and Brazil? The US and Canada? Argentina and South Africa? Even Israel??

We see “elected leaders” accessing top government posts using 19th century “democratic” voting mechanisms, that are all controlled by a highly complex 21st century technocratic Over-world, embedded inside the US, UK, EU and most every other country. It operates from inside these countries – even using the military might of the US and NATO countries – but in no way does it heed, support or respond to the interests of these peoples. Was it really the US, Britain and France that invaded and destroyed Iraq, Afghanistan and now Libya? Or is it something far more elusive and powerful embedded inside them but controlled from way above today’s completely outdated, eroded, fatally weakened and – at this rate – soon to disappear “sovereign Nation-State”?

It’s high time we make the necessary quantum leaps that will allow us to start joining the dots. We need to move away from silo mentality paradigms, and towards a much more holistic Weltanschauung. We have become too “specialised,” which leads to narrow-mindedness. We talk about finance but never join the dots on its geopolitical overtones. We talk about politics but are blind to underlying social forces. We think Hollywood is only about “entertainment,” not realising how they implant ideas and behaviour patterns into our collective psyche.

Information and data overdrive generate confusion, as we become overwhelmed by trillions of bits of data that swamp our brains every day, hour, minute and second. A healthy tip: take your proper distance and perspective so that we all start to see the big picture. Only then can we move down to the finer detail, because the forest is far, far more important than the tree… at least in this stage where we all need to come to grips with a question that should be growing louder and louder in your mind no matter where you live or who you are: what on Earth is going on!?

We had better find the answers quickly because we are fast coming to a fork of world historic proportions on the road of human destiny. We either climb up the high road leading to human evolution which will necessarily entail the painful but necessary destruction of the Global Power Elite and all who support, consolidate, empower and fuel its growth, or… we slip down the low road into a dark abyss of death, destruction, mass hypnosis and the end of the human spirit; a vision pretty close to what men throughout the ages have described as Hell…

What road will you take? We can still make the right decision. There is not, however, much time left.

Footnotes
1. Arab countries fighting back against US-UK-EU intervention in the Middle East and North Africa are branded “terrorists” or “rogue states,” whilst the very cause of the problem – i.e., long decades of violent US-UK-EU and Israeli terror interference in Arab countries is never branded “terrorism” (in fact, they call it “promoting democracy” or some such Newspeak). Militarised groups are thus branded either “terrorist” or “freedom fighters” depending on which side they stand vis-à-vis the Global Power Elite.
2. See The New York Times, 19 June 2011, “War Evolves with Drones, some Tiny as Bugs”, by Elisabeth Bumiller and Tom Shankar.

ADRIAN SALBUCHI is a political analyst, author, speaker and radio talk-show host in Argentina. He has published several books on geopolitics and economics in Spanish, and recently published his first eBook in English: The Coming World Government: Tragedy & Hope? which can be ordered through his web site www.asalbuchi.com.ar, or details can be requested by E-mail to arsalbuchi@gmail.com. Salbuchi is 58 years of age, married, with four adult children, and works as strategic consultant for domestic and international companies. He is also founder of the Second Republic Project in Argentina, which is expanding internationally (visit: www.secondrepublicproject.com).

The above article appeared in New Dawn No. 129. Reproduced with permission of the publisher. © New Dawn Magazine and the respective author.

The curious case of the “break into Auschwitz”

2012-01-27T13:58:00.001-08:00

The curious case of the “break into Auschwitz”

By wmw_admin on January 25, 2012

Guy Walters – New Statesman Nov 17, 2012

Over the weekend, the Sunday Times reported that Denis Avey, the author of the memoir The Man Who Broke Into Auschwitz, had changed important elements of his story before his bestselling book was published.
According to the article, Avey’s account of how he had bravely swapped places with a Jew to enter into Auschwitz was radically different from an interview he had given to the Imperial War Museum in July 2001.
In the taped interview, Denis Avey claimed that he had gained entry to Auschwitz-Birkenau by swapping places with an unnamed “stripey” – as British prisoners of war (POWs) called the Jewish inmates on account of their striped uniforms – and had been accompanied by a Jew called Ernst. However, in the published book, Avey claims that he broke into Auschwitz-Monowitz (a camp about four miles from Birkenau), swapped places with a Dutch Jew called Hans, and that the man who accompanied him was not “Ernst”.
One does not need to be a Holocaust historian to appreciate that these are important differences of fact.
Despite the assertion by the Sunday Times that this evidence is new, the catalogue of problems with Avey’s story was highlighted by myself and my co-authors, Jeremy Duns and Adrian Weale, in the pages of the Daily Mail some seven months ago. Furthermore, we informed Avey’s publishers, Hodder & Stoughton, in May of the existence of no fewer than eight differing versions Avey has given of his celebrated “swap”, including the one given to the Imperial War Museum as well as accounts in the Daily Mirror and the Times.
Jeremy Duns — whom readers of this blog will remember from the Hari affair – wrote about these the differing versions of the story on his own blog a month ago.
Besides coming somewhat late to the feast, the Sunday Times failed to notice the smoking gun, the element which demonstrates that Denis Avey’s story is questionable. In his interview for the Imperial War Museum, Avey says that he made the swap in an attempt to make contact with an Australian POW who claimed to have been incarcerated in Birkenau and forced to stoke the crematoria:

So over the days and weeks we arranged to have an ‘umtausch’ – an exchange. I went in to Birkenau with Ernst and this stripey got into my uniform and got into E715 for the night. And I went with him to Birkenau and slept alongside him, as was the position of this other fellow, and in this way I got the information, very surreptitiously again [...] Now he [Ernst] told me of an Australian POW that was working in Birkenau, and sure enough he did. I tried constantly to contact him. I couldn’t. I don’t know why – I couldn’t. And you know what he did? He was an escaped POW. They picked him up just going into Switzerland in civilian clothes, and they interrogated him because of the civilian clothes, and they wanted to know how he got the clothes, how he got the map, how he got the compasses and he wouldn’t tell them. He’d got my temperament and he was an Australian to boot as well. And of course he caused a lot of problems, and they beat him badly, and then they sent him to Auschwitz-Birkenau. You know what he did? He stoked the crematoria. He stoked the crematoria for twelve months. I tried to contact him after the war: I couldn’t, but then I found out he’d written a book called “Stoker”.

The supposed stoker to whom Avey refers is Donald Watt, who published a book about his experiences in 1995. Unfortunately for Avey, that book has been widely shown to be yet another discredited Holocaust memoir.
The work has been dismissed by Yad Vashem, by the Auschwitz Memorial and Museum, by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and, most devastatingly, by Professor Konrad Kwiet, resident historian at the Sydney Jewish Museum and the former chief historian of the Australian War Crimes Commission.
In an article published in 1997, Professor Kwiet revealed that Watt’s Service and Casualty Form kept by the Australian army showed that he was discharged from Stalag 357 in April 1945, and that there was no evidence he had ever been in Auschwitz-Birkenau. Here is an extract from Kwiet’s article:

The unbelievable Stoker-story has enjoyed a remarkable reception in Australia… However, Donald Watt’s “memoirs” were not universally applauded. Criticism came from abroad. Members of the Research Institute of the US Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington questioned the authenticity of Watt’s testimonies. The Fritz Bauer Institute rejected the manuscript for translation into German. Yad Vashem, Israel’s official documentation and research centre on the Holocaust, was asked for an expert opinion report. The Stoker-story was examined by Gideon Greif, an authority who had just published a documentation on the Jewish “Sonderkommandos” (“Wir weinten tränenlos… Augenzeugenberichte der jüdischen Sonderkommandos.” Köln; Böhlau et al. 1995). He concluded that Watt “at no time had been a member of the Sonderkommandos in Auschwitz-Birkenau… The author describes a reality of the everyday life of the Sonderkommandos which never existed”. In May 1996 a negative report arrived from the Museum of Auschwitz. Dr. Franciszek Piper, Director of the History Research Department, could find no record of the imprisonment of a “British subject/citizen/person of Australia” (…sic byly jeniec brytyijski z Australii…), let alone an Australian POW serving within the ranks of the Jewish “Sonderkommando”.

Given this, and the various conflicting versions of Avey’s supposed “swap”, it is almost impossible to take The Man Who Broke Into Auschwitz at face value.
There are four bodies that need urgently to address the problems with Avey’s story. First, there is Hodder & Stoughton, which told the Sunday Times: “We had no reason to doubt Mr Avey’s account at the time of publication and we have no reason to doubt it now.” The paperback of Avey’s book is currently second in the Sunday Times‘s non-fiction chart.
Second, there is the Holocaust Educational Trust (HET), which has embraced Avey and promoted him. It is largely thanks to the HET that the third body in question — the British Government – awarded Avey a British Hero of the Holocaust medal, an award the HET campaigned to be established.
The fourth organisation that needs to ask questions is the BBC, whose employee Rob Broomby is the co-author of Avey’s book. The broadcaster has been generous in giving airtime to what is essentially a commercial enterprise. Furthermore, Broomby has serious questions to answer. At what point during the writing of The Man Who Broke Into Auschwitz did he become aware that some of his co-author’s claims were problematic?
There are numerous other problems with Avey’s book, and not just those concerning his time as a POW. However, the passages regarding the Holocaust are what have propelled the book to the top of the charts, and it is these claims that have led to Avey being both feted and honoured.
Given that the account of Avey’s story about “breaking into Auschwitz”, as published in this book, varies in such a fundamental and disquieting way from his earlier telling to the Imperial War Museum, the book should be withdrawn from circulation and its claims presented to an independent body of historians for assessment.
Duns, Weale and I asked Hodder & Stoughton to do this seven months ago. The firm can no longer afford to be an ostrich. In order to protect its reputation, it must realise that telling such questionable stories about the Holocaust is a distasteful business.

Super-rich party people say: Let’s go to Montenegro

2012-01-26T14:17:00.000-08:00

Super-rich party people say: Let’s go to Montenegro

By wmw_admin on July 7, 2011

Andy McSmith – The Independent July 7, 2011

This week, it was Monte Carlo. Next week, Montenegro. Nat Rothschild, who has one of the best financial brains in a family renowned for business acumen, will be 40 next Tuesday, and intends to make this a weekend to remember.

The financier is rumoured to be splashing out £1m on a birthday bash. That is small change for a man whose personal wealth is reckoned to be about a thousand times that amount. And the little state of Montenegro is understandably delighted to be chosen as the venue.

Montenegro is a staggeringly beautiful, mountain statelet onn the c oast of the Adriatic, only just more than half the size of Wales with a population of 660,000, slightly more than that of Glasgow. It has been an independent state only since 2006, when its people voted in a referendum to sever their union with Serbia. It is probably best known to the British public as the supposed setting of the film Casino Royale, though most of it was actually shot in the Czech Republic.

Uniquely for a sovereign state, Montenegro has no currency. All transactions are conducted in euros though it is not in the EU or the eurozone. This peculiarity has made it a magnet for Russian oligarchs, and for people who want to disguise the source of their wealth, such as Irish drug barons.

It is also open for those with legitimate business interests, including Nat Rothschild, who will be combining with pleasure by flying his guests in to see for themselves the attractions of the Bay of Kotor, one of Europe’s finest natural harbours, tucked between the mountains of Montenegro.

Mr Rothschild and his main business partner, the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, have sunk a lot of money in to the fresh concrete that has been laid on the water’s edge in Kotor Bay. The British media will obviously focus its attention on who is or is not a guest at the Rothschild bash, because the only social event of the summer to match this one was last week’s wedding of the billionaire Prince Albert of Monaco to the former Olympic swimmer Charlene Wittstock.

Eager to whet everyone’s curiosity, Porto Montenegro’s sales and marketing director, Colin Kingsmill, has told journalists that invitations have gone to “the ritziest, wealthiest, and most photogenic people on earth”.

It will be a glitzy occasion because Nat Rothschild has a lot of famous names in his contacts book. He was a contemporary of George Osborne at Oxford University, where they were both in the Bullingdon Club together, five years after David Cameron and Boris Johnson. It was Mr Rothschild who brought Mr Osborne and Peter Mandelson together on Oleg Deripaska’s yacht, in the summer of 2008, setting off an entertaining political furore when Mr Osborne revealed what Lord Mandelson had said in private about Gordon Brown.

When Rothschild threw a party in New York in 2008, the principal guest was Saif al-Gaddafi, son of the Libyan dictator, but no one expects him to join the party in Montenegro.

It can be assumed, though, that Nat Rothschild’s parents will be there. His father, Jacob, the fourth Baron Rothschild, is an investment banker and philanthropist, and his mother, Serena, is a racehorse owner who set a world record in 2004 by paying 4.6 million guineas (£4.7m) for the racehorse Magical Romance.

His social and business circles also include the oligarch Roman Abramovich, owner of Chelsea football club, the former head of BP, Tony Hayward, the American art dealer Larry Gagosian, Roland Rudd, co-founder of the Finsbury financial PR group, and many more.

While others of us may be nervously checking our bank statements and cutting down our overheads in these austere days, there are people in the world inhabited by Nat Rothschild with worries of a different order, including the shortage of parking spaces for exceptionally large yachts.

The marinas of southern France and Italy were designed a generation ago, when a yacht longer than about 100ft was pretty rare even in a millionaires’ playground. The Lady Ghislaine, the yacht off which the crooked tycoon Robert Maxwell fell to his death in 1991, was an exception, at 180ft, but Maxwell liked to have the biggest and best of everything, even if it meant paying for it with other people’s pensions.

These days, the Lady Ghislaine is nowhere near big enough to feature on the list of the top 100 privately owned yachts. A 240ft super-gin palace would get in at the bottom of that chart, while at No 1 there is Roman Abramovich’s Eclipse, which is three times the length of Maxwell’s.

As more of these superyachts came off the production lines, Europe’s billionaires were in danger of having to wander the Mediterranean with nowhere to dock until a group of entrepreneurs decided to create Porto Montenegro, in the Bay of Kotor, which, when it is complete in five or six years, will include a luxury hotel, a casino, 700 apartments, and 650 yacht berths.

After Nat Rothschild’s guests have quaffed his champagne and sung a chorus of “Happy Birthday” they will get a chance to look around. And that can only be good for business.

The VIP guests

* Nat Rothschild’s guest list has not been made public, but according to Montengran sources, it is so glitzy and ritzy that Tony Blair’s name was the dullest on the page. Mr Blair will not be joining the guests, though no one will be surprised to see Lord Mandelson there.

* Among the mega-rich believed to have been invited there is Oleg Deripaska, Russian owner of the world’s largest aluminium firm, Roman Abramovich, Peter Munk, Hungarian born head of the world’s largest gold mining corporation, the South African mining tycoon Mick Davis and Ivan Glasenberg, boss of Glencore, one of the world’s largest commodity companies.

* Another likely guest is Tony Hayward, who went into business with Nat Rothschild after losing his position at the head of BP over the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The commodity trading company they founded together is valued at over £1 billion.

* But George Osborne, who has enjoyed Nat Rothschild’s hospitality before, may think it too big a political risk to be spotted enjoying the high life in Montenegro just now.

Montenegro for beginners

* In the time of Christ, Montenegro was an outpost of the Roman Empire. Later, it was ruled by the Serbs, then by the Turks. Its people are Orthodox Christian Slavs, closely related to the Serbs.

* The country’s national hero, the Montenegran Shakespeare, is Petar II Petrovic Njegos, who was a Christian Orthodox bishop and the secular ruler of the country until his early death in 1851.

* In 1878, Montenegro was recognised by the Turks as an independent state. After the 1914-18 war, it was included in Yugoslavia. The best-known 20th century Montenegran was Milovan Djilas, a communist who stood out alone not only against Stalin but against the corruption and repression under Yugoslav’s dictator, Tito. It was the last state to leave the Yugoslav Federation.

* After the break-up of Yugoslavia, Montenegro decided that it would be too expensive to create its own currency, and adopted the Deutschmark. In 2001, all the DMs in the country were gathered up, the large number of counterfeits were discarded, and the rest returned to Germany, who in return sent Montenegro an initial consignment of €30m, mostly in coins.

Edible Microchips, Biometric Identity Systems And Mind Reading Computers

2012-01-26T14:04:00.000-08:00

Edible Microchips, Biometric Identity Systems And Mind Reading Computers

By wmw_admin on January 19, 2012

End of the American Dream – January 17, 2012

As technology continues to advance at an exponential rate, will we someday find ourselves living in a “scientific dictatorship” where virtually everything that we do, say and think is monitored and controlled by technology? To many of you that may sound like a wild assertion, but just keep reading. Our world is changing faster than ever before, and scientists have some absolutely wild things planned for our future. As you read this, they are feverishly developing edible microchips, cutting edge biometric identity systems, and mind reading computers. Many futurists envision a world where someday nearly all humans are embedded with microchips and have thousands of tiny nanobots living inside of them. The idea is that we can “take control of our own evolution” and use technology to “improve” humanity. But very few of those futurists address the potential downsides. The truth is that all of this technology could one day be used by a totalitarian government to establish a dystopian nightmare where nobody has any liberties and freedoms whatsoever.

The world of tomorrow is not going to be anything like the world of today, and most people have no idea how dramatically the world is changing.

For instance, many people have never even heard of “edible microchips”.

Unfortunately, they are not some wild idea that some wacky scientists are hoping to develop in the future.

They are already here, and they are about to be marketed to the public in the UK.

The idea is that these edible microchips will help doctors monitor your health conditions and the medicines that you are taking. The following comes from a recent article in the Daily Mail….

The sensor, which contains no battery, antenna or radio, creates a unique digital signature that is picked up and recorded by a patch attached to the patient’s shoulder.

The patch, which also monitors bodily functions such as heart rate and temperature, sends this encrypted information to blue-tooth enabled smartphones or computers owned by the patient and their doctors and carers.

In this way, both patients and their doctors can work out exactly which pills have been taken. Medics can also interpret whether the patient is sleeping well, or taking enough exercise using the information transmitted from the patch.

But could such edible microchips be used for more nefarious purposes in the future?

Of course.

And scientists are developing many other new ways for you to be tracked by technology as well.

For example, do you remember in the movie “Minority Report” how Tom Cruise had to cover his eyes because he was being tracked by them wherever he went?

Well, it won’t be too long before that becomes a reality in our world.

IBM is aggressively developing new biometric identity systems that could significantly change the way that we live our lives. The following is from a recent IBM press release….

You will no longer need to create, track or remember multiple passwords for various log-ins. Imagine you will be able to walk up to an ATM machine to securely withdraw money by simply speaking your name or looking into a tiny sensor that can recognize the unique patterns in the retina of your eye. Or by doing the same, you can check your account balance on your mobile phone or tablet.

Each person has a unique biological identity and behind all that is data. Biometric data – facial definitions, retinal scans and voice files – will be composited through software to build your DNA unique online password.

Referred to as multi-factor biometrics, smarter systems will be able to use this information in real-time to make sure whenever someone is attempting to access your information, it matches your unique biometric profile and the attempt is authorized.

When biometric identity systems become widespread enough, authorities will pretty much know where you are and what you are doing at all times.

But even more frightening is something else that IBM is developing right now. IBM scientists are actually working really hard to develop mind reading computers. The idea is that someday we will all be able to control various electronic devices simply by using our thoughts….

IBM scientists are among those researching how to link your brain to your devices, such as a computer or a smartphone. If you just need to think about calling someone, it happens. Or you can control the cursor on a computer screen just by thinking about where you want to move it.

Scientists in the field of bioinformatics have designed headsets with advanced sensors to read electrical brain activity that can recognize facial expressions, excitement and concentration levels, and thoughts of a person without them physically taking any actions.

The following promotional video from IBM describes some of these emerging technologies in more detail….

But IBM is not the only one working on mind reading technology.

Several video game makers have been attempting to develop games that you control not with a joystick or a gamepad but rather with your brain waves.

This all sound fascinating, but could such technology someday be adapted for other purposes?

Instead of us controlling the electronic devices that we connect our brains to, could they instead be used to control us someday?

Being more “connected” is not necessarily a good thing.

People have been looking for ways to stay more “connected” to the Internet for a long time, and many futurists are now suggesting that we should find a way to directly connect our brains to the Internet. An article on the website of the Science Channel put it this way….

What if it were possible to connect your brain to the Internet, either wirelessly or through a cable, download digital information at high speed, and then translate it automatically into a chemical form that could be stored by your brain cells as memory?

The same article explained what some of the benefits from such a connection might be….

If you could pump data directly into your gray matter at, say, 50 mbps — the top speed offered by one major U.S. internet service provider — you’d be able to read a 500-page book in just under two-tenths of a second.

But wouldn’t this be potentially dangerous?

If we found a way to connect our brains to the Internet 100% of the time, couldn’t someone potentially “download” damaging programs or “viruses” directly into our heads?

That is something to think about.

A British researcher named Mark Gasson infected an RFID chip in his hand with a computer virus and found that the virus-infected chip implanted in his hand was able to contaminate external systems.

So wouldn’t the danger be far greater if we connected our brains directly to the Internet?

I don’t know about you, but I don’t plan on ever connecting my brain directly to the Internet and I don’t plan on ever letting anyone put an RFID chip inside of me either.

Unfortunately, the use of implantable RFID chips in humans and animals is rapidly spreading. A lot of employers now require that their employees take them for identification purposes. Some cities in the U.S. are actually making it mandatory to put microchips into your pets.

Increasingly, RFID implants are being injected into thousands of elderly Americans living with Alzheimer’s disease who are at risk of wandering off and getting lost. In addition, RFID chips are being implanted into many people who are chronically ill so that doctors can access their medical information quickly in an emergency.

And many companies are working hard to make it even easier to implant RFID chips into humans and animals.

In fact, one company called Somark has developed a stunning breakthrough in chipless RFID ink. Their “RFID tattoos“ are applied using a geometric array of micro-needles and a reusable applicator.

Somark says that it is incredibly easy to apply one of these RFID tattoos. They say that it only takes about 5 to 10 seconds to tattoo an animal or a human. Once the tattoo has been applied, an RFID reader can read it from up to four feet away.

Frightening stuff.

But some say that there might be an even easier way than that to keep track of everybody in the future.

IBM is actually working on a “bar code reader” that can read your DNA. The following is from a Fox News article about this project….

The DNA Transistor is a project from IBM Research that aims to advance personalized medicine, by making it simpler (and much cheaper) to read an individual’s unique DNA sequence — the special combination of proteins that makes you unlike anyone else.

The technology isn’t finished yet, but its potential is tantalizin enough that IBM wanted to share it with the world. And the company claims researchers are making progress.

Essentially a bar code reader for genes, the DNA Transistor is part technique and part device. It consists of a 3-nanometer wide hole, known as a nanopore, in a silicon microchip. A sensor in the pore can read DNA and determine its unique makeup.

Our world is changing at a mind blowing pace right now.

The decisions that are made now are going to have a dramatic affect on how the future plays out.

That is why so many of us are speaking out about how the government is watching us and about how our liberties and our freedoms are being taken away.

If we don’t stand up for freedom and liberty right now, our children may one day wake up in a world where they are so controlled by technology that they are unable to do so.

Right now we are not too far away from the kind of world that authors such as George Orwell once warned about. This article will conclude with a quote from his famous work 1984….

“It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourself–anything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an improper expression on your face…; was itself a punishable offense. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime…”

Mumbai Terrorist Was U.S. Agent

2012-01-26T13:57:00.000-08:00

Mumbai Terrorist Was U.S. Agent

After terrorist conspirator and “former” U.S. government agent David Coleman Headley received promises of leniency and extradition protection from American prosecutors for his role in the 2008 Mumbai massacre, speculation about his true masters was set ablaze as outrage erupted across India.
Headley — a former Drug Enforcement Administration agent and the son of a Pakistani diplomat — pled guilty to various criminal charges on March 18 in connection with his terrorist activities in India, Pakistan and Denmark. He is reportedly “cooperating” with investigators.
In exchange, the government vowed not to allow foreign authorities to question him or subject him to trial. Prosecutors also agreed not seek the death penalty, and he may not even serve a life sentence. Links to U.S. intelligence agencies will remain classified. And his guilty plea ensures that there will be no drawn-out trial that could publicly reveal any relationships with various intelligence agencies — most notably, the Central Intelligence Agency-linked Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence.

Headley admitted in the plea bargain that he helped plan the bloody massacre by conducting surveillance and selecting targets, gathering GPS coordinates for the terrorist team’s boat landing along the coast, and more. He was also helping to plan an attack on a Danish cartoonist. And while the Federal Bureau of Investigation was given almost 10 hours to question the only surviving attacker in India, a team of Indian investigators who traveled to the U.S. to interrogate Headley was turned away.
The plea deal and the lack of American cooperation immediately sparked fury and despair in India, as the U.S. is reportedly bound by treaty to surrender Headley to Indian authorities. It also fueled accusations in the media that Headley still may have been linked to the American or Pakistani governments in some capacity. He began his terrorist training around the time that he was working for the U.S. government. But the connections, however, remain shrouded in mystery.

The terrorist group he was known to be working with —the ISI-linked Pakistani Lashkar-e-Taiba— carried out the devastating Mumbai attack in November of 2008 that dominated headlines around the world. The terrorists rampaged through the city with machine guns and grenades, leaving over 150 dead and hundreds more wounded. And as it turns out, the terrorist group was actually created with the help of Pakistan’s secret services, which have well-known ties to the American Central Intelligence Agency and other government agencies.

“The LeT’s close links with Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) are legion and it is inconceivable that such a massive operation — with huge international ramifications and the potential to trigger war with India – could have been undertaken without the knowledge of the ISI, headed by General Ashfaq Parvez Kiani, the present army chief, from October 2004 until October 2007,” wrote M.K. Bhadrakumar, a former Indian ambassador who served in Pakistan, the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, among other assignments.
Along with many prominent Indians, Bhadrakumar strongly condemned Headley’s plea agreement in the press. “The deal enables the US government to hold back from formally producing any evidence against Headley in a court of law that might have included details of his links with US intelligence,” he wrote in the article for Asia Times. “Headley’s links with the US intelligence will now remain classified information and the Pakistani nationals involved in the Mumbai attacks will get away scot-free.”

He also noted that the Obama administration was “behaving very strangely” and that it had something “extremely explosive” to hide. “The speculation gaining respectability in Delhi is that Washington knew in advance about the Mumbai attack and deliberately chose not to pass on details to Delhi,” the ambassador noted in the piece, entitled ‘A spy unsettles US-India ties.’ “Clearly, the Obama administration was apprehensive that Headley might spill the beans if the Indians got hold of him and the trail could then lead to his links with the CIA, the LeT and the Pakistani military.”

Headley’s involvement with the U.S. government began when he was caught trafficking heroin. To reduce his sentence, the DEA convinced him to work as an undercover agent in Pakistan. And in exchange for his cooperation, he only served two years. After 9/11, the agency worked closely with other government outfits, and they were forced to share information. So anti-terror operations had to have been aware of Headley’s activities. These facts have led Indians to conclude that he was, in fact, still working for American intelligence.
“Many Indians are convinced that Mr. Headley is a CIA agent, perhaps gone rogue, and that the U.S. intransigence represents an attempt to shield him and his past activities from scrutiny,” said writer Akash Kapur in a piece published by the New York Times. Another New York Times piece, entitled ‘American Scout for Mumbai Attacks Was Jokingly Called ‘Agent Headley’ by Friends,’ points out that Indians who knew Headley had long suspected that he worked for the CIA.
“I had a hunch then and I have a hunch now that he was an American agent of some sort,” Headley’s Indian friend Rahul Bhatt told Channel 4 News. “I nicknamed him Agent Headley. I thought, and I suggested to him, that he worked for the Central Intelligence Agency, and he used to not like it.” Apparently, Headley even “begged” Bhatt to stop calling him “Agent Headley” in public.

An important former Indian government and counterterrorism official was blunt with his conclusions as well. “The mishandling by the US is due to its anxiety to prevent a public admission of the US intelligence community’s links with him and to protect Pakistan from the legal consequences of its role in the 26/11 terrorist strikes,” noted security analyst Bahukutumbi Raman, a former top counter-terrorism official with India’s foreign intelligence service.
“The plea bargain entered into by the FBI with Headley last week has created strong suspicions in India that the FBI wants to avoid a formal trial of Headley and was reluctant to allow Indian investigators to interrogate him because Headley was a deep penetration agent of the US intelligence,” he added. Raman explained that Headley “was not a double agent, but a quadruple agent.” He also allowed for the possibility that Headley may have gone horribly “out of control.”

Speculation about the U.S.-agent-turned terrorist continues to run rampant in the Indian press. But how much is really known? In court documents, Headley’s associates are referred to simply as A, B, C and D. So the truth about Headley may never be known to the public. And while that is a veritable tragedy, the truth must still be sought. The theories remain as varied as they are numerous, but the secrecy and strange deals seem to confirm people’s suspicions that their governments are totally out of control and out of touch with the citizenry. Pakistan and India have even moved their “proxy war” into U.S.-occupied Afghanistan, complicating matters even further.

But there are several lessons to be learned from the tragedy and its fallout. For the Indians, be much more careful when “cooperating” with “allies.” Also, examine your own government carefully — many of the theories surrounding the attack involve cooperation of at least some Indian officials.
Even more importantly, the government must respect the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The terrorists stormed through the city unhindered — slaughtering everyone in their path — for more than two days! As famed Indian pacifist Mohandas Gandhi wrote in his autobiography: “Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the act of depriving a whole nation of arms, as the blackest.” And still, decades after independence, the government continues its counterproductive and dangerous policy of keeping law-abiding people disarmed, and therefore, easy targets.

For Americans, there are serious implications too. If the federal government would stick to the Constitution and quit meddling in foreign nations, these sorts of issues would not even crop up. The anti-American animosity and suspicion built up around the world would not exist. “Blowback” would not threaten American citizens and interests around the world. And the billions of dollars saved could be returned to the citizenry. So for the sake of U.S. taxpayers, victims of terrorism around the world and all of the casualties of the “war on terror,” it’s time for some serious changes in American foreign policy. The people must hold the government accountable, or the tragic consequences — death, oppression and confusion — will continue to mount.
---------------------------
Alex Newman is an American freelance writer and the president of Liberty Sentinel Media, Inc., a small media consulting firm. He is currently living in Sweden and has spent most of his life in Latin America, Europe and Africa. He has a degree in foreign languages and speaks Spanish, French, Portuguese, German, Italian and a little Swedish and Afrikaans. In addition, he earned a degree in journalism from the University of Florida, with emphasis on economics and international relations.

Gilad Atzmon-Jewish Imperial News

2012-01-26T13:44:00.000-08:00

Jewish Imperial News

By Gilad Atzmon on January 25, 2012

Gilad Atzmon – gilad.co.uk January 25, 2012

This last weekend brought with it some vile manifestations of Jewish politics in its most horrific forms.

United Against the Goyim

In the USA, the owner and publisher of the Atlanta Jewish Times, Andrew Adler, suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu should consider ordering a Mossad hit team to assassinate U.S. President Barack Obama so that his successor will defend Israel against Iran.

Actually, it wasn’t just Obama whom Adler suggested to eliminate, the Atlanta Jewish Times listed three lethal options to help Israel counter Iran’s nuclear capability. The first, to launch a pre-emptive strike against Hamas and Hezbollah, the second to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities and the third is to assassinate the current American president.

Devastatingly, Adler’s murderous attitude towards politics is wholly consistent with some Biblical and Talmudic anti-gentile teaching. It recalls clearly certain Old Testament genocidal verses such as Leviticus 26:7-8:

‘You will chase your enemies, and they shall fall by the sword before you. Five of you shall chase a hundred, and a hundred of you shall put ten thousand to flight; your enemies shall fall by the sword before you.’

It is also consistent with the appalling way in which Palestinians are abused by the Jewish State. But it is also consistent with the Jewish cultural wrath towards the dissenting Jesus and towards dissent in general. May I remind readers that the word Yeshu – Jesus in Hebrew – is the abbreviation of the Hebrew phrase

“may his name and memory be blotted out”.

Without comparing president Obama to Jesus, Adler’s homicidal inclination is somewhat similar. Seemingly, some Jews have yet to forgive Jesus – nor President Obama. .

The American Jewish Committee in Atlanta condemned Adler’s article, saying that Adler’s proposals were

“shocking beyond belief.”

- a pretty bizarre reaction, considering that the American Jewish Committee is itself an enthusiastic advocate of a war against Iran. Similarly, warmonger Alan Dershowitz listed recently the ‘legal’ reasoning behind an Israeli attack on Iran. True, he has yet to call for an American President to be murdered, he just thinks that launching another world war is a ‘reasonable’ thing to do. And, as far as I can remember, the American Jewish Committee didn’t rush to denounce Dershowitz or to apologise on his behalf or in the name of the Jews.

United Against Freedom

In Britain, following some relentless Jewish Lobby pressure, Press TV, The Iranian News Channel was forced off the air after Ofcom (The ‘Independent’ regulator for the UK Communications Industries), revoked its licence for ‘breaching the Communications Act’. This should come as no surprise. Bearing in mind that 80% of British Tory MPs are Conservative Friends of Israel, we in Britain must expect the rapid fading away of some of our most elementary freedoms.

United Against Palestine

On Saturday the Islamophobic blog Harry’s Place and the Zionist mouthpiece Jewish Chronicle completed their takeover of UK Palestinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC). In the last two years, the PSC EC has expelled and marginalised some of its leading intellectuals amongst them some prominent Palestinian and Muslim activists and now, at last, they are beginning to receive their just credit.

In the last two months we have noticed that the PSC has been praised by both the notorious JC and Harry’s Place. Two weeks ago, pro-war Harry’s Place thanked the Jewish ‘anti’-Zionists for promoting Jewish tribal interests at the midst of the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign and this weekend a PSC Executive member confirmed that PSC’s latest maneuvers against ‘anti-Semitism’ were in response to criticism from the rabid Zionist website Harry’s Place and the Jewish Chronicle. Like others, I am confused. Should a Palestinian solidarity group surrender to an Islamophobic blog, a Zionist paper and other ‘Jews-only’ pressure groups?

Judging by the scale of the celebration on Islamophobic Harry’s Place, you’d be forgiven for assuming that PSC – now firmly committed to the struggle against anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial – is now just one more Zionist outlet, whose prime interest is in promoting Jewish tribal interests. I’m sure that the Palestinians in besieged Gaza and in refugee camps all over the Middle East are over the moon.

However, to counter the now complete Zionist takeover of PSC EC, a bunch of leading solidarity activists, journalists and intellectuals have launched deLiberation, a new UK dissident magazine. We aim to become a leading UK media outlet, to provide news, analysis and fearless criticism – exactly where The Guardian and the BBC so miserably fail. And we will fill that space now created by the current PSC Executive Committee.

United Against The Guardian

Two days ago, I discovered that CIF Watch, a Jewish supremacist site interested solely in cleansing British press of any criticism of Israel and Jewish power, was boasting that the Guardian surrendered to their pressure and

‘removed an Atzmon passage.’

Apparently the Jewish site was annoyed that Khaled Diab quoted me as saying

“The Jewish state is pretty devastated by the idea that a bunch of ‘indigenous Arabs’ are far more technologically advanced than its own chosen cyber pirates.”

Specifically, it didn’t approve of the Guardian printing the word ‘chosen’ in reference to Jews.

The CIF Watch site says of itself that it is

dedicated to monitoring anti-Semitism and combating the assault on Israel’s legitimacy in the Guardian newspaper’s

Comment is Free’ blog.” So, it is not against racism or discrimination in general, but solely interested in matters to do with one group and its tribal interests.

Shocking but typically, the Guardian surrendered immediately to the Zionist’s demands. As the Guardian rushed to admit: the word ‘chosen’ “is at odds with ‘Guardian regulations”. But the Guardian needs reminding that ‘Choseness’ may be at odds with ‘Guardian regulations’ but it is clearly not ‘at odds’ with Israeli practice, the Israeli legal system, the Jewish Lobby and even Jews-only Palestinian solidarity groups.

United Against Truth

Three months ago I published ‘The Wandering Who’. This book presented a harsh criticism of Jewish identity politics, Left, Right and Centre. It openly argued that contemporary Jewish identity politics is exclusivist, in most cases, racially driven and, in many ways, is a threat to world peace. In some ways, as in Adler’s call to assassinate Obama, it actually also endangers Jews.

The book attempts to grasp the bizarre continuum between Israeli barbarism, Adler’s homicidal inclination, the PSC EC surrender to rabid Zionist bodies and the ‘Guardian’s regulation’. The book points to the political culture that made Jewish identity politics so powerful and, at the same time, so blind. And in spite of a united front’s attempt to silence the book and its message, in just a short space of time the book sold thousands of copies and its message is spreading like a forest fire.

I’m not one bit surprised by the surge of Jewish power. I wrote a book about it. But, being intimately familiar with Jewish history, I know exactly where it will lead. Jewish political arrogance has always proved to be, above all, devastatingly dangerous for Jews.

For the sake of peace, both Jews and gentiles must confront the prominence of Jewish identity politics. We should never be afraid to question ideologies and lobbies that impose a threat to peace, our value systems, freedom of thought, humanity and humanism.

Gilad Atzmon’s New Book: The Wandering Who? A Study Of Zionist’s global interests Amazon.com or Amazon.co.uk

The Puzzling Matter of the Israeli Liberals

2012-01-24T21:58:00.000-08:00

The Puzzling Matter of the Israeli Liberals

By Ramzy Baroud

January 24, 2012

Regardless of who may rule Israel, little change ever occurs in the country's foreign policy. Winning parties remain obsessed with demographics and retaining absolute military dominance. They also remain unfailingly focused on their quest to initiate racist laws against non-Jewish residents of the state, and continue to hone the art of speaking of peace, while actually maintaining a permanent state of war.

Every few years the media become captivated by Israeli democracy. Commentators speak of right, left, center, and anything in between. Despite Israeli elections still being a year and a half away, media pundits are already discussing possible outcomes of the vote against the peace process, economic reforms, social equality, and so on.

In a recent article, Israeli columnist Uri Avnery decried the fact that the main opposition to the right-wing parties — "the Likud, the Lieberman party and various ultra-nationalist, pro-settlement and religious factions" — is no other than the center-left Kadima. The party, led by the "incompetent" Tzipi Livni, is allegedly in "shambles." Moreover, left parties, such as Labor and Meretz, are not expected to pose a real threat to the right party conglomerate, despite their temporary rise in the polls.

As genuine as he is, Avnery is once again presenting the false hope of a savior emerging to save Israel from itself. Avnery envisions Israel being rescued from its "neo fascists" and returned to the over-romanticized scenario of old, when early Zionists supposedly dreamed of an Israel governed by universal ethics, true democracy, peace and social equality . "I fervently hope that a different kind of new political force will emerge — a center-left party with a clear and inclusive message: Social reform, narrowing the gap between rich and poor, the two-state solution, peace with the Palestinians and the end of the occupation."

But this is as far as the imagined narrative of a kinder, gentler Israel can possibly go. Many outside Israel struggle to reconcile familiar discourses of democracy and equality with the reality on the ground. True, the ailment is not exclusive to Israel itself, but few other self-proclaimed democratic countries have such a massive gap between mainstream political discourses and actual policies.

Recall, for example, what the media touted as Israel’s own "Arab Spring." Even those who knew Israeli history hoped for a fleeting moment that the mass protests throughout Israeli cities could actually challenge the political and social status quo in Israel. But not Seraj Assi, a columnist and Ph.D student at Georgetown University. Assi wrote: "The dirty secret of the Tel Aviv protests is that the bulk of those middle-class Ashkenazi protesters are moved by a racist hysteria. They are simply afraid of being moved to the city peripheries and the far less fashionable parts of the country. For when they complain that they only feel at home in Tel Aviv, they explicitly express a racist desire to stay away from the development towns and neighborhoods populated by Arabs, poor Mizrahi and Ethiopian Jews."

Indeed, the protests labored to stay clear of contentious discussions of military occupation, war, and even racial inequality within Israeli itself.

Not even the one-sided war on Gaza, which resulted in the killing of over 1400 Palestinians, was enough to raise the level of mass consciousness to challenge political and military apparatuses in Israel in any meaningful way. Under the title, 'The Moral and Military Meltdown in Israel’, Hamid Dabashi, Professor of Comparative Literature at Columbia University, wrote: "It is not just the worst of the Israelis who (according to a recent poll by Haaretz) condone and actively support the slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza, but so have their very best, their intellectuals, professors, journalists, filmmakers, novelists and poets, from Amos Oz to David Grossman to A. B. Yehoshua to Meir Shalev and scores of others" (Jan. 12, 2009).

While right-wing Israeli parties are often dismissed as anti-peace and hawkish, the "liberal" Zionists in the Israeli left have been viewed by some as an alternative, capable of writing wrongs and achieving the long-awaited peace. These are mere "delusions," argued Roger Sheety in a recent article. "Scratch just a little below the surface and you discover that... when it approaches the Palestinian person in particular, (Liberal Zionism) suddenly stops and fully reverses itself," he wrote (Jan. 9).

Sheety suggests a "clear and concise word for this phenomenon…hypocrisy." But 'hypocrisy’ might be too easy a term to explain this very involved trend in Israeli politics, which defined the Zionist movement long before the state of Israel was established in 1948. A most compelling book by Israeli author Tikva Honig-Parnass traces the roots of liberal Zionism from an insider perspective. It is a profound addition to a growing library that challenges "liberal" Zionists’ claim to liberalism or progressiveness.

After reading Honig-Parnass’ book, one is left with a clear impression that liberal Zionists are neither 'Israel’s best’ and nor is their double-speak a simple reflection of hypocrisy. Liberal Zionists were, and remain at the heart of the problem. After all, the Israeli Right didn’t emerge as a powerful player in politics until the late 1970s. All that proceeded — the Nakba, the ethnic cleansing, the Law of Return, the 1967 war and further colonial expansion, and even the war on Gaza in 2008-09 — were orchestrated by Israel’s Zionist Left leaderships. More, the "systematic institutional discrimination against Palestinian citizens was (also) applied through the strengthened power of the Zionist Left," Honig-Parnass argues. Even the most 'radical’ forces in Israel are tainted, as the Zionist Labor movement rallied around racial discrimination against non-Jews before the establishment of Israel; later laws made racial discrimination against non-Jewish laborers the status quo, as is the case today.

To hold hope in the new election cycle in Israel is like waiting for false messiahs. No salvation will be heralded by some imagined center-left party that will bring "an end to the ultra-rightist frenzy," as hoped by Avnery.

The task will not be easy, but a true shift in Israeli politics can only occur at the foundational level by confronting the country’s apartheid-like political institutions. More, by challenging the "Zionist Left political and ideological perspectives," a way could open for "progressive forces among Jews and Palestinians to fight together against the Zionist/Jewish state," as suggested by Honig-Parnass.

- Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press, London).

The "right" to murder anyone.......

2012-01-13T05:07:00.000-08:00

The Varieties of Pissing

Arthur Silber

Three slain Afghans lay bloodied while American servicemen urinate on their bodies.*

*[[(Reuters) - A video showing what appear to be American forces urinating on dead Taliban fighters prompted anger in Afghanistan and promises of a U.S. investigation on Thursday, but the insurgent group said it would not harm nascent efforts to broker peace talks.
The video, posted on YouTube (HERE) and other websites, shows four men in camouflage Marine combat uniforms urinating on three corpses. One of them jokes: "Have a nice day, buddy." Another makes a lewd joke.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the video, describing the men's actions as "inhuman" and calling for an investigation, in a statement on Thursday evening.
It is likely to stir up already strong anti-U.S. sentiment in Afghanistan after a decade of a war that has seen other cases of abuse, and that could complicate efforts to promote reconciliation as foreign troops gradually withdraw.
"Such action will leave a very, very bad impact on peace efforts," Arsala Rahmani, a senior member of the Afghan government's High Peace Council, told Reuters.
The U.S. embassy in Kabul also condemned the actions of the men, and the U.S. military has promised an investigation.(...)
In Washington, U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta denounced the actions show in the film as "utterly deplorable. "Those found to have engaged in such conduct will be held accountable to the fullest extent," he said in a statement.
Panetta said he had ordered the Marine Corps and the commander of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan to investigate. ISAF described the acts depicted in the video as "disrespectful" and "inexplicable".
Two military officials in the United States, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the video appeared to be authentic, but Reuters could not verify it or its source independently.]]

January 12, 2012

Here is William Blum describing the destruction of Iraq by the United States (offered by Chris Floyd in a recent post; emphasis added):

"Most people don't understand what they have been part of here," said Command Sgt. Major Ron Kelley as he and other American troops prepared to leave Iraq in mid-December. "We have done a great thing as a nation. We freed a people and gave their country back to them."

"It is pretty exciting," said another young American soldier in Iraq. "We are going down in the history books, you might say." (Washington Post, December 18, 2011)
Ah yes, the history books, the multi-volume leather-bound set of "The Greatest Destructions of One Country by Another." The newest volume can relate, with numerous graphic photos, how the modern, educated, advanced nation of Iraq was reduced to a quasi failed state; how the Americans, beginning in 1991, bombed for 12 years, with one dubious excuse or another; then invaded, then occupied, overthrew the government, tortured without inhibition, killed wantonly, ... how the people of that unhappy land lost everything — their homes, their schools, their electricity, their clean water, their environment, their neighborhoods, their mosques, their archaeology, their jobs, their careers, their professionals, their state-run enterprises, their physical health, their mental health, their health care, their welfare state, their women's rights, their religious tolerance, their safety, their security, their children, their parents, their past, their present, their future, their lives ... More than half the population either dead, wounded, traumatized, in prison, internally displaced, or in foreign exile ... The air, soil, water, blood, and genes drenched with depleted uranium ... the most awful birth defects ... unexploded cluster bombs lying anywhere in wait for children to pick them up ... a river of blood running alongside the Euphrates and Tigris ... through a country that may never be put back together again …

The facts set forth by Blum are simply that: facts. These issues are not open to dispute, and one can discover the truth of what Blum says by reading numerous articles from many sources. Despite this, Blum notes that Barack Obama once again proclaims this all-encompassing destruction of an entire country and its peoples to be "an extraordinary achievement, nearly nine years in the making."

This complete inversion of the truth is the consequence of centuries of unending lies. The result is day turned into night, life transformed into death -- and all of it is, must be, good. These are the perverse demands of American mythmaking, as I described it in "The Blood-Drenched Darkness of American Exceptionalism" from July 2010:

[T]he U.S. invasion and occupation represent an ongoing series of war crimes. This is not an arguable point in any respect. Since it cannot be argued, it is ignored altogether.

And it is not just ignored, as malignantly evil as that would be by itself. The American exceptionalist myth tells us that the United States is unique and uniquely good. It is not sufficient to ignore negative consequences of our actions: we must transform any and all negative consequences into a positive good. This process has been rigorously followed for every American intervention ever undertaken (going back to the Philippines, then with the American entrance into World War I, on into many interventions after World War II, on into Iraq and Afghanistan today), and the identical process has been well underway for several years in connection with Iraq in particular.

...

Such is the limitless power of delusion on this scale: a blood-drenched tragedy of world-historical proportion becomes "an extraordinary achievement," and a criminal war of aggression is transmuted by the alchemy of cultural myth-making into a "success." This is the evil to be found at the rotted heart of the myth: whatever the United States does, it will lead to good and only to good.

And all of it -- all of it -- is a damnable, unforgivable lie.

In January 2012, we begin another year that will be filled with pain, terror, blood and death. The monstrous bearer of these terrible gifts will again be the government of the United States. The trail of suffering extends through Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen and Libya. Perhaps Iran will be yet another recipient of the United States' magnificent generosity.

The ambition of the United States ruling class extends far beyond what is suggested by this list. As I noted in "The Face of the Killer Who Is Your President," quoting Nick Turse:

This global presence -- in about 60% of the world's nations and far larger than previously acknowledged -- provides striking new evidence of a rising clandestine Pentagon power elite waging a secret war in all corners of the world.

...

In 120 countries across the globe, troops from Special Operations Command carry out their secret war of high-profile assassinations, low-level targeted killings, capture/kidnap operations, kick-down-the-door night raids, joint operations with foreign forces, and training missions with indigenous partners as part of a shadowy conflict unknown to most Americans.

One further element must be added to the list of horrors:

Obama and his administration claim the "right" to murder anyone in the world, wherever he or she may be, for whatever reason they choose -- or for no reason at all. Obama and his administration recognize no upper limit to the number of people they can murder in this manner: they can murder as many people as they wish. And they claim there is nothing at all that may impede their exercise of this "right."

This is the game entire. Understand this: once Obama and his administration have claimed this, there is nothing left to argue about. They can murder you -- and they can murder anyone else at all. What in the name of anything you hold holy remains to be "debated" once a vile, damnable "right" of this kind has been claimed?

We recoil from understanding the nature and breadth of the horror that surrounds us. That is understandable, to some extent. Survival sometimes requires a certain degree of selective focus. (I had originally written "denial" instead of "selective focus." But denial is never advisable; it is especially not advisable in matters of life and death.) Yet if we wish to resist evil, we must be able to contemplate the enemy we face with dispassionate, even clinical detachment.

Perhaps this passage will help to make the issue clearer:

The highest levels of the United States Government have told you -- repeatedly, at great length, always emphasizing the critical significance of their conviction on this point -- that the lives of Americans are worth less than shit. Your life, the lives of all those you love and all those you know, the lives of everyone in your city and state, the lives of all Americans are worth absolutely nothing.

...

There is no power greater than that of life and death. This is absolute power. This is the power claimed by every slaughtering monster in history. You know this. You refuse to understand what it means.

As the condensed factual recitation above demonstrates, the United States Government recognizes no difference between the lives of Americans and the lives of anyone else anywhere on Earth: all human beings anywhere are to be brutalized, terrorized and murdered as the United States Government chooses.

The repeated actions of the U.S. Government over more than a hundred years -- and its actions today -- place this fact beyond all question. This is the horror that greets you upon waking in the morning; the screams of the victims are the lullaby to which you fall asleep. The horror is the air you breathe. It is the cultural atmosphere that surrounds you. It is the knock on the door.

In the parlance of the day, or what would be that parlance if we spoke more plainly, we can say with accuracy and precision:

The ruling class of the United States pisses on the entire world, just as it pisses on every human being who is not favored by privilege and power.

This is the ultimate foundation of our lives today. This is the truth that will almost never be spoken.

Since we resolutely refuse to acknowledge the actual horror, we neurotically displace our outrage onto matters of comparative triviality. It is certainly disgusting that U.S. Marines pissed on the bodies of several dead Taliban -- but isn't it more disgusting that the Taliban are dead in a criminal war of aggression waged to advance American global hegemony? Rank these items in terms of the disgust you think they merit:

* The systematic destruction of a series of nations and their peoples over a period of many decades.

* The murder of more than a million innocent people in a criminal war.

* The ongoing murders of people who do not (and most commonly could not) threaten the U.S., in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia, and on and on and on -- in 120 countries around the globe.

* The claim that the U.S. Government has the "right" to murder anyone in the world for whatever reason it chooses -- a "right," I remind you, which the U.S. Government has actualized.

* Pissing on three dead bodies.

We refuse to speak about the first four items, but the guardians of our culture insist that they are sickened and outraged by the last one. Displacement of this kind is never innocent. The purpose is to help those who claim to be disgusted and outraged convince themselves (and us) that they (and thus "we") are "moral," "good" and "decent." They are not. If they were, they would speak about the other items -- and they would speak about them all the time. But they almost never mention them, except to justify them.

The statement from a "Media Officer" for the Marine Corps is a genuine obscenity: "the actions portrayed are not consistent with our core values and are not indicative of the character of the Marines in our Corps." Under the pressure of the interminable lies of American exceptionalism, joy becomes suffering and life is turned into death, and it is demanded that these perversions be regarded as good. The "Media Officer" engages in another variant of these sickening inversions: "the actions portrayed" are the perfect embodiment of their "core values." The Marine Corps is a key instrumentality used by the United States Government in its wars of criminal aggression against innocent human beings. Nothing they do can be anything other than an obscenity. The fact that they are in Afghanistan at all is an obscenity. The fact that they murder human beings there is an obscenity. That they pissed on the dead bodies is a detail in the context of the policies and actions which give rise to the American presence in that country in the first place.

A further truth, a particularly ugly one, should be noted. Although many commentators have feigned outrage and disgust about this incident, what actually concerns them is not that it happened, but that the incident has become known. They are worried that public knowledge of the incident is bad PR. I heard a local Los Angeles radio host (this moronic fuck) express this despicable point of view with unusual clarity yesterday. I made notes during his comments, so this is very close to exact: "I'm upset because of what it does to the country [the U.S., that is] and what it does to the Marine Corps. I really don't care that they urinated on dead Taliban. I have no sympathy for the dead guys, maybe that makes me a terrible person, I don't know [it does] ... but this is really bad, that this story is out there."

The same host read an email from the father of a man who is currently in the U.S. military. The father exulted in the desecration of the bodies and said that is the least "they" deserve. The host wondered if the son would agree, thinking the son might take the Media Officer's line that such behavior is "not consistent" with the "core values" of the Marine Corps. The father wrote a followup email, which the host proceeded to read as well. The father had immediately written to his son and asked him what he thought. The son -- who, I repeat, is in the military today -- said, "Good! That's exactly what they deserve. My guys would be [bleeping] on them!" I assume the son had written "shitting," although the host declined to read that word on the air. We are so good and decent!

This kind of attitude is not uncommon among Americans in general, and it certainly cannot be uncommon among those in the military. This must be true given that the U.S. has not used its military overseas in a genuinely defensive war for decades. The U.S. military is sent overseas in offensive wars of aggression, or in preparation for wars of aggression. This isn't secret, specialized knowledge; it is knowledge easily available to anyone with minimal knowledge of recent history and current events. Moreover, this fact must be blindingly clear to a member of the military who travels many thousands of miles, to somewhere on the other side of the globe. A person who is capable of the most basic thought must wonder: "What the hell am I doing here, and how can these people possibly be a threat to the United States?" At this point in time, I do not think there is any legitimate reason for an individual to join the U.S. military. You will find my argument in several essays; you can start here and here, and follow the links. In the past, I did not offer as definitive a judgment on this question as I do now. If you join the U.S. military today, you are volunteering to be part of a vast, worldwide killing operation. Period.

One final point must be mentioned. I said that what actually concerns most of the "outraged" commentators is that this incident has become known, not that it happened. What I meant, of course, is that it has become known to the American public. It is not possible that an incident of this kind is unusual or perpetrated only by "a few bad apples." As was true of the horrific abuses at Abu Ghraib, it must be the case that incidents like this occur with considerable frequency. You cannot be part of a vast, worldwide killing operation -- you cannot travel across the globe and murder (or be prepared to murder) innocent human beings who otherwise could not possibly threaten you -- and remain a "nice," "decent" human being. I repeat: it is not possible. Since horrors like this must occur with hideous regularity, it must also be the case that the people who live in the countries victimized by the U.S. know of them. The horrors of Abu Ghraib were not news to Iraqis. Incidents like the one to which we Americans devote so much time today cannot be news to the people of Afghanistan.

But Americans live in the cocoon of the myths that are reinforced every day by almost every voice in the media, and by the majority of "ordinary" Americans themselves. Videos like the current one threaten those myths, and they throw into question our cherished belief that we are "good" and uniquely so. Pissing on dead bodies is not an image that can be reconciled with our desperate self-flattery, with our unquestioned and unquestionable belief that we are inherently superior to all other peoples and entitled to our way in everything, in all corners of the world. So it must be explained, and minimized, and excused. When it is condemned, it is condemned as an outlier, an extraordinary event that is "not consistent with our core values."

We will not acknowledge or come to terms with the fact that the U.S. Government has declared war on the world -- what else can it mean that the U.S. has ongoing operations in 120 countries? -- and that the ruling class maintains it has the "right" to murder any human being it chooses. So I state again:

The rulers of the United States piss on you, and on every other human being on Earth not favored by privilege and power.

You need to protect yourself as best you can.

Source

THE SECRET OF CHINESE PYRAMIDS

2012-01-12T15:12:00.000-08:00

Alien Base Found At Chinese Pyramid ???

Nine university scientists gaped upwards at the gigantic, prehistoric pyramid that had no right to exist

A team of daring Chinese researchers, digging into the ancient mysteries of the origin of their country, have come to the inescapable conclusion that 12,000 years ago an interstellar, supreme alien race used much of the northern and central Chinese regions as massive Earth bases.

Hundreds of strange pyramids cover parts of China

One such base may be the astonishing pyramid structure that sits near the apex of Mount Baigong in the western province of Qinghai, the Xianyang pyramid.

China is the focus of legends, myths and stories of alien visitations and many of them center on the Xianyang pyramid.

Local villagers claim their distant ancestors spoke of sky great ships that navigated the heavens and used the pyramid as a landing, refueling and resupply site.

ET origins investigated

The hypothesis regarding extra-terrestrials is "understandable and worth looking into, [but] scientific means must be employed to prove whether or not it is true,” Yang Ji, one of the scientists and a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences explained to reporters.

While the scientific exploration team agrees, all indications are that aliens used the giant structure as one of its primary Earth bases.

Top is flattened - to accomodate landing ships?

The anomalous pyramid rises almost 200 feet above the countryside—the surrounding area littered with mystifying pipes, bizarre artifacts and unworldly odds and ends.

China’s state-run Xinhua agency sent a nine man team to investigate the pyramid and report back on their findings.

The team discovered pipes running from the caves and deep into the ground slanting down into the earth…towards what?

Scientific team discovered numeous odd articfacts

The agency tersely says: “The pyramid has three caves with openings shaped like triangles on its façade and is filled with red-hued pipes leading into the mountain and a nearby salt water lake.”

Above the caves are dozens of pipes—all of various diameters—that mysteriously run into the mountainside beneath the towering pyramid. All the pipes match the color of the surrounding rocks, a murky reddish-brown.

Broken pipe goes deep into ground to...?

Elsewhere, more pipes, many lying shattered are scattered littering the ground in every direction. Some of the pipes follow the bank of a salty lake while others dip into the water and plunge beneath the lake bed.

One of the 'alien' artifact pipe fragments

Although the pipes' purpose is offically classified as unknown, some of the Chinese scientists are leaning towards the idea that the structure truly is the remains of some advanced outpost or starbase.

The pyramid complex stretches out much farther than what is visible and evidence suggests a highly technological network of pressurized pipes supplying water and possibly fuels.

Strange artifacts litter the pyramid site

Since the ancient site dates from at least 10,000 BCE—and is perhaps twice as old as that—no humans could have engineered it as no serious human culture existed that long ago.

Qin Jianwen, the head of the publicity department of the Delingha government, says fragments of some of the pipe material were taken for analysis. The pieces were found to be mostly silicon dioxide and calcium oxide, although more than eight percent of the metal could not be identified.

"The large content of silicon dioxide and calcium oxide is a result of long interaction between iron and sandstone, which means the pipes must be very old," Liu Shaolin an engineer who did the analysis explained.

How old? Some are guessing 12,000 years…maybe much, much older.

Enigma wrapped in a mystery

That such structures exist fits neatly into the unofficial history of China—a history most scholars choose to ignore.

Some historians have called the early Chinese culture an "enigma wrapped in a mystery."

Tales of China's ancient days are crammed with stories about the "sky people" and the "god-men" who came from the stars using the Earth as a base for exploration. Along the way these beings taught some of the primitive peoples they met the basics of technology, engineering, farming, and the complex structure of the universe.

In the early years of the Twentieth Century two merchants from Australia crossed central China. Upon the vast plains they found more than 100 pyramids. Locals told the two men that the pyramids were very old—some much older than China.

Other younger pyramids dated to the reigns of the oldest emperors. Those rulers often spoke of extraterrestrials and civilizations on other planets like Earth. Some of the emperors even wrote that they were the progeny “of the sons of the sky, who had landed upon Earth in iron dragons.”

The "skymen"—some still claim—built the oldest pyramids.

Astonishing 'Dropa stones' may provide clue to Chinese alien bases

Translation from the one of the 12,000-year-old Dropa stones: "The Dropas came down from the clouds in their aircraft. The men, women and children of the neighboring peoples (Ham) hid in the caves ten times before sunrise. When at last they understood the sign language of the Dropas, they realized that the newcomers had peaceful intentions..." [Translated from the language on the stones by the man who successfully deciphered them, Dr. Tsum Um Nui.]

The great Xianyang pyramid is only one of many mystery sites pointing to one or more advanced races interacting with the primitive peoples of Earth.

The famous Dropa stones also provide strong evidence for extended Earth visits from ancient astronauts.

The stones were found by Chi Pu Tei who led an archeological expedition to the bleak and windswept Baian-Kara-Ula mountain range in 1938. The range sits on the Chinese-Tibetan border and is home to many stories about ancient extraterrestrials mingling with Earth people.

While exploring a series of almost inaccessible mountain caverns last inhabited by crude primitives thousands of years in the past, the scientific team made an exciting discovery: some of the cavern walls were covered with pictograms depicting scenes of the Solar System.

What's more, somehow these ancient people had created a map of the heavens illustrating the Earth, sun, Moon and various stars connected with intersecting lines and dots.

Curiously the pictogram-maps almost resemble ancient trade routes or a guide for explorers.

Other pictograms illustrate frail beings with round helmet-like bowls on their heads.

One of the more than 700 Dropa discs found

But the team's excitement was just beginning. In one of the caves with the murals of the heavens they found a stone disc half-buried in the dirt. The disc had a thin spiral groove expertly cut into its face running from the center to the edge.

The disc they found measures about nine inches in diameter and roughly three-quarters of an inch thick. The center has a perfect hole that's three-quarters of an inch across.

Once they found the disc, Tei instructed his team to hunt for more. Eventually they dug up a veritable treasure trove. A total of 716 discs were found, some in pristine condition, others cracked or broken into pieces.

Upon later inspection, mysterious heiroglyphic symbols were found carved inside the grooves. Obviously the disc contained a motherlode of information of some kind.

Two of the discs Dr. Tsum Um Nui deciphered

Unfortunately, despite their potential importance, the discs languished for years in packing crates. They were buried and forgotten in the dusty storage area of a museum until Dr. Tsum Um Nui copied the writing from each of the surviving discs to paper.

Dr. Nui succeeds in deciphering 'Dropa stones'

The unknown heiroglyphs were so miniscule he could only read them with the aid of a powerful magnifier.

An expert at deciphering ancient languages, Nui worked diligently for many months to crack the language. Finally, he succeeded.

What he learned would change the known history of the world, if anyone listened. Few did.

The stones recorded an amazing story written at least 12,000 years ago by a fantastic people the world had forgotten.

The discs relate the voyage of the Dropa to Earth. How they crashed during their exploration of the planet and became marooned on Earth, a foreign world unknown to them. Their spacecraft was located in what later became known as the Baian-Kara-Ula mountains, part of the Himalayas.

Stranded, the lost travelers sought refuge in caves—the very caves Chi Pu Tei and his scientific exploration team had discovered the discs.

"The Dropas came down from the clouds in their aircraft," another disc said. "The men, women and children of the neighboring peoples (Ham) hid in the caves ten times before sunrise. When at last they understood the sign language of the Dropas, they realized that the newcomers had peaceful intentions..."

Yet another disc tells of the aliens having bulging heads and withered bodies. At first the tribe sent hunters to kill the invaders until the people found the strange beings meant no harm.

Villagers in the area still pass down the legends about the visitors that "came from the stars, long, long ago."

After deciphering as many of the discs as he could, Nui wrote a paper about the historic discovery for the Chinese Academy of Prehistory.

They refused to publish it. Although well-documented and no question of it being fraudulent, the editor of the journal told Nui that the world was not ready for such information to be known.

The Chinese authorities under Mao were also quite explicit in their reaction. They forbid the doctor from seeking to publish his paper outside of China or even to speak of the Dropa stones.

Despite the order, Nui did share the information with some close colleagues and eventually some of the story managed to leak out to the rest of the world.

Russian scientists join Dropa investigation

The Los Angeles Herald-Examiner published "Riddle of Asian Stone Discs from Outer Space" on February 26, 1967. The article focused on some Russian researchers who had been intently studying some of the Dropa stones.

"The Russians," wrote the Herald-Examiner, "who have examined some of the discs in a Moscow laboratory, claim to have made two important discoveries. One is that the discs contain certain traces of metal; particularly cobalt. Secondly, when placed on a special turntable they hummed in an unusual rhythm like an electrical charge was passing through them.

"The Russian Zaitsev, who has spent 30 years collecting evidence that intelligent beings from outer space have had contact with the earth, believes that the discs may give substance to ancient Chinese legends of small, gaunt, yellow-faced men who came down from the clouds many centuries ago."

Incredible Ancient Asian art depicts alien encounters

China's pre-history is rife with alien ships, alien beings and alien goings-on.

An ancient Chinese relief depicts an episode in the countryside when frightening "flying men" terrorized herders. Eerily, the ancient artist recorded exactly what UFO investigators would record today.

This is a reproduction of the stone relief found by a scientific expedition of anthroplogogists during 1957 led by professor Tsj'i Pen-Lai.

The remarkable relief was discovered within an ancient maze on Jotuo island in Lake Toengt'ing. The expedition took place in 1957.

The Lolladoff disc plate above was found in Nepal and dated to around 10,000 BCE. Note what appears to be a saucer-shaped object in the center and a being, resembling an alien at the lower right.

Not all aliens stay put in China

This old Asian scroll from Japan depicts a Japanese merchant happening upon a small flying saucer that's landed near a rice field.

Look carefully at the writing above the craft. The column on the right is not Japanese, it's a representation of the symbols the merchant saw on the craft and described to the artist who then added them to the scroll for accuracy.

The Large Families that rule the world

2011-10-18T00:10:00.000-07:00

The Large Families that rule the world

18.10.2011 00:50

Some people have started realizing that there are large financial groups that dominate the world. Forget the political intrigues, conflicts, revolutions and wars. It is not pure chance. Everything has been planned for a long time.

Some call it "conspiracy theories" or New World Order. Anyway, the key to understanding the current political and economic events is a restricted core of families who have accumulated more wealth and power.

We are speaking of 6, 8 or maybe 12 families who truly dominate the world. Know that it is a mystery difficult to unravel.

We will not be far from the truth by citing Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Loebs Kuh and Lehmans in New York, the Rothschilds of Paris and London, the Warburgs of Hamburg, Paris and Lazards Israel Moses Seifs Rome.

Many people have heard of the Bilderberg Group, Illuminati or the Trilateral Commission. But what are the names of the families who run the world and have control of states and international organizations like the UN, NATO or the IMF?

-----------

To try to answer this question, we can start with the easiest: inventory, the world's largest banks, and see who the shareholders are and who make the decisions.

The world's largest companies are now these six: Bank of America, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

Let us now review who their shareholders are.

Bank of America:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, FMR (Fidelity), Paulson, JP Morgan, T. Rowe, Capital World Investors, AXA, Bank of NY, Mellon.

JP Morgan:

State Street Corp., Vanguard Group, FMR, BlackRock, T. Rowe, AXA, Capital World Investor, Capital Research Global Investor, Northern Trust Corp. and Bank of Mellon.

Citigroup:
State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock, Paulson, FMR, Capital World Investor, JP Morgan, Northern Trust Corporation, Fairhome Capital Mgmt and Bank of NY Mellon.

Wells Fargo:
Berkshire Hathaway, FMR, State Street, Vanguard Group, Capital World Investors, BlackRock, Wellington Mgmt, AXA, T. Rowe and Davis Selected Advisers.

We can see that now there appears to be a nucleus present in all banks: State Street Corporation, Vanguard Group, BlackRock and FMR (Fidelity). To avoid repeating them, we will now call them the "big four"

Goldman Sachs:

"The big four," Wellington, Capital World Investors, AXA, Massachusetts Financial Service and T. Rowe.

Morgan Stanley:
"The big four," Mitsubishi UFJ, Franklin Resources, AXA, T. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon e Jennison Associates. Rowe, Bank of NY Mellon and Jennison Associates.

-------------

We can just about always verify the names of major shareholders. To go further, we can now try to find out the shareholders of these companies and shareholders of major banks worldwide.

Bank of NY Mellon:
Davis Selected, Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Dodge, Cox, Southeatern Asset Mgmt. and ... "The big four."

State Street Corporation (one of the "big four"):
Massachusetts Financial Services, Capital Research Global Investor, Barrow Hanley, GE, Putnam Investment and ... The "big four" (shareholders themselves!).

BlackRock (another of the "big four"):
PNC, Barclays e CIC.

Who is behind the PNC? FMR (Fidelity), BlackRock, State Street, etc.
And behind Barclays? BlackRock

And we could go on for hours, passing by tax havens in the Cayman Islands, Monaco or the legal domicile of Shell companies in Liechtenstein. A network where companies are always the same, but never a name of a family.

In short: the eight largest U.S. financial companies (JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, U.S. Bancorp, Bank of New York Mellon and Morgan Stanley) are 100% controlled by ten shareholders and we have four companies always present in all decisions: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity.

In addition, the Federal Reserve is comprised of 12 banks, represented by a board of seven people, which comprises representatives of the "big four," which in turn are present in all other entities.

In short, the Federal Reserve is controlled by four large private companies: BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard and Fidelity. These companies control U.S. monetary policy (and world) without any control or "democratic" choice. These companies launched and participated in the current worldwide economic crisis and managed to become even more enriched.

To finish, a look at some of the companies controlled by this "big four" group

Alcoa Inc.

Altria Group Inc.

American International Group Inc.

AT&T Inc.

Boeing Co.

Caterpillar Inc.

Coca-Cola Co.

DuPont & Co.

Exxon Mobil Corp.

General Electric Co.

General Motors Corporation

Hewlett-Packard Co.

Home Depot Inc.

Honeywell International Inc.

Intel Corp.

International Business Machines Corp

Johnson & Johnson

JP Morgan Chase & Co.

McDonald's Corp.

Merck & Co. Inc.

Microsoft Corp.

3M Co.

Pfizer Inc.

Procter & Gamble Co.

United Technologies Corp.

Verizon Communications Inc.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc.

Time Warner

Walt Disney

Viacom

Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation.,

CBS Corporation

NBC Universal

The same "big four" control the vast majority of European companies counted on the stock exchange.

In addition, all these people run the large financial institutions, such as the IMF, the European Central Bank or the World Bank,[ΝΑΙ, ΤΟ Δ.Ν.Τ. (IMF) και η Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική τραπεζα κλπ ειναι ΙΔΙΩΤΙΚΕΣ ΤΡΑΠΕΖΕΣ - οπως η Federal Reserve (η κεντρικη τραπεζα των ΗΠΑ) και η ελληνικη Τραπεζα της Ελλαδος] and were "trained" and remain "employees" of the "big four" that formed them.

The names of the families that control the "big four", never appear.

Lisa Karpova

2011-10-15T09:06:00.001-07:00

Gagarin's death in1968 - Perestroika and correction
of the truth since 1986

Gagarin's alleged planecrash and the rumour mill - with Gorbachev new truths about the"Soviet" atmosphere flight are published

by Michael Palomino (2006 / 2010)

beginning of 1968
"SU": Gagarin is said to be inpreparations for his first upper atmosphere flight
Officially the flight is presented as the second one of course.
(http://space.about.com/b/a/161615.htm)

Yuri Gagarin:The last foto with the bloated face. According to Wisnewski Gagarin isflightless. Gagarin is shown here again not in an astronaut suit but ina parachute suit. Who shall he be capable to fly to the moon in aparachute suit?

February1968
Official"SU"historiography:Gagarinfinishedhis studies at the military aviation academy
at the Zhakovskymilitary aviation academy. For his studies Gagarinneeded 7 years.
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruzwyshn/HTMLFolder/Gagbio.html)

[OfficiallyGagarin had many parastatal jobs so the long study isunderstandable. The "fatherland" needed him for other things than forearth orbits].

27 March 1968
"SU":The alleged lethal Gagarin-Seryogin plane crash
Gagarinis said having lost his life in an air fighter crash(Wisnewski, p.61).

Under theteacher (Wisnewski, p.63) squadron commander Seryogin Gagarinis said having had the order to fly with a MiG from the militaryairport Tshakalovski a "flat 8", a relatively easy exercise (Wisnewski,p.62).

At 10:30 Gagarinis said having reported that he fulfilled the task ofthe "flat 8". Then Gagarin shall have been mute. At 14:50 helicopterswith cosmonaut Alexej Leonov shall have reported that they found anairplane wreckage:

-- there wouldbe the wreckage of Gagarin with remnants of Seryogin(Wisnewski, p.62)

-- the airplaneis said having drilled meters into the forest soil andthe crater is said having filled quickly with water (Wisnewski, p.62)

-- officiallythe authorities maintain that they found Gagarin's mapand Gagarin's wallet with Gagarin's passport, driving license, and witha foto of Koroljov (Wisnewski, p.62)

-- add to thisthe authorities maintain officially that Gagarin'sflight jacket was hanging on a birch (Wisnewski, p.62), and recoverycosmonaut Leonov confirmed this also in ZDF in 2001 (Wisnewski, p.63).

ContradictionsaboutthelastGagarinflight

There is noprecise investigation about the alleged crash (Wisnewski,p.61-62) and the contradictions are absolutely serious that anymanipulation seems to be possible:

-- the questionwhy Gagarin had been allowed to steer an airplane afterhis alleged "accident" from 1961 with a craniocerebral injury(CCI) and with astrong change of personality is never put officially. Already thisseems to be an impossibility (Wisnewski, p.62) because Gagarin wasofficially unfit to fly and never had been allowed to enter a cockpit(Wisnewski, p.63)

-- neither Gagarin nor theteacher Seryogin seem to have used theejection seat to save themselves which is an impossibility forprofessional pilots (Wisnewski, p.63)

-- the bodyof Gagarin is never found (Wisnewski, p.62)

-- the foto ofthe alleged scene of the accident does not show anythingbut a pool, and there cannot be seen one single trace of a plane crash.It's a plane crash without wreckage, and the truth is hidden(Wisnewski, p.63)

-- only lateralleged parts of Gagarin's body are presented, butwithout indication of the location where they were found and withoutdescription of the condition (Wisnewski, p.63)

-- according tostatements of ZDF in 2001 remnants of Gagarin'sairplane are stored in steel barrels in a "sealed safe" on a "militarybase outside of Moscow" and shall stay there so the truth aboutGagarin's plane crash will never come out (Wisnewski, p.63).

There is alsothe claim that the airplane had no flight recorder andthat's why the cause of the crash will never be clear. This isabsolutely unbelievable:

"Thecause for the catastrophe [of Gagarin's crash] will never be clearedcompletely because the military jet with Gagarin and instructorVladimir Seryogin had no flight recorder."

(orig.: "Die Ursache derKatastrophe[des Absturzes von Gagarin] wird sich nie vollständig aufklären lassen,weil der Militärjet, mit dem Gagarin und der Instrukteur WladimirSeryogin abstürzten, keinen Flugschreiber besass.")

(http://www.astrolink.de/m056/m056008/m056008_m001_06.htm)

30 March1968:"SU": State funeral ceremony for Gagarin
Gagarin's state funeral in Moscow on the Kremlin wall: Wreaths.	Gagarin's states funeral in Moscow: The grave.	Gagarin'sstate funeral in Moscow on the Kremlin wall: The crowd with Gagarinfotos.
Gagarin'sstate funeral in Moscow on the Kremlin wall: Last salute for Gagarin.	Gagarin'sstate funeral in Moscow on the Kremlin wall: Crowds on Gagarin'sgrave.

Wisnewskidoubtsthecrashand means the coffin was empty an Gagarin perhaps in apsychiatry (Wisnewski, p.64).

[Consideringthat Gagarin was in a miserable condition and should fly amoon mission it could have been the calculus of the "SU" regime to getrid of Gagarin with an imaginary state funeral in a "smooth" way].

since April 1968approx.
TheWestern media presume Gagarin is in a psychiatry
TheWestern media presume that Gagarin would be alive yet andwould be hidden in a psychiatry to hide Gagarin as a craniocerebralpatient because it would be a shame for the "Soviet Union" to have a"Hero of the Soviet Union" in a psychiatry (Wisnewski, p.64).

Thewidow with the Lenin decoration without Lenindecoration
Gagarin'swidow gets the Lenin decoration but never wears it(Wisnewski, p.64).

SomemorerumoursaboutGagarin'sdeath - Brezhnev keeps secret the investigation report

The rumours:
-- one part ofthe population believe that Gagarin has not died in 1968and the accident and the funeral was a staging

-- another partmeans that a KGB conspiracy murdered Gagarin
-- another partmeans that aliens had kidnapped Gagarin
-- another partmeans Gagarin had committed suicide by drinking toomuch Vodka and had flown drunk.
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,470371,00.html)

State'spresident Brezhnev keeps secret the detailed report of theinvestigation commission with the argument that the report could rockthe whole nation. The report in 30 volumes about registering balloonsas a cause for the crash is stored in the archives and there is nopublication except a short summary.
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,470371,00.html).

September 1980:
FidelCastro visits the "room of the martyrs" of the"SU" atmosphere flight
(http://www.lostcosmonauts.com/unknown.htm)

In September1980 a Cuban "guest cosmonaut", Amaldo Tamayo-Mendez, istaken on board of the capsule "Soyuz 38" on an upper atmosphere earthorbit flight.After the perfect return he is celebrated at Havanna like a hero.

On the ceremonyFidel Castro gives a moving speech and describes thecosmonaut education center at Zvezdny Gorodok (Star City). He wasreally impressed from the copy of the office of Yuri Gagarin, where anycosmonaut had to go for a meditation before the flight. As a traditionall cosmonauts leave a letter on Gagarin's desk with the promise thatthey will beware and honour the tradition of bravery of the "Soviet"cosmonauts which had been before.

The office hadbeen kept in the condition as it was at the time ofGagarin's death on 27 March 1968. His things are still on the desk,his agenda is lying open on the table yet, his uniform is hanging onthe hallstand yet, all watches are stopped on the time of the [alleged]accident.

Castro continueshis speech and describes another room, the so called"room of the martyrs". The access to this room is strictly controlled.On the walls are the fotos of all cosmonauts which died during the"Soviet" space program [atmosphere program]. Castro is deeply moved bythe presentation of this heroism in this special room. He is adding:

"There are manyheroes which sacrificed their lives on the beginning ofspace age." [atmosphere age]

[So the victimsare presented but cannot be seen by anybody].

1983
"US"-"Chimponaut""Ham"from1961dies1983 in theNorth Carolina Zoological Park
(Smithsonian:http://www.smithsonianmagazine.com/issues/2006/january/history.php)

Perestroika times

Now new truths are coming out about atmosphere flights of "SU":

1986
"SU"propaganda presents the story about Bondarenko'sdeath without skin: The story of the cooker

The "SU"leadership publishes a story about the case of the cosmonautBondarenko without skin:

-- Bondarenkohad been in a long time test in a chamber with pureoxygen atmosphere (Wisnewski, p.29)

-- Bondarenkohad wared a woolen suit there (Wisnewski, p.30)

-- Bondarenkohad used a rag or a piece of cotton wool and threw it onthe hot cooker and by this the cotton wool caught fire: With a rag /pieceof cotton wool which was dipped in alcohol Bondarenko is said havingwanted to remove remnants of a medical sensor. By mistake he threw therag / piece of cotton on a hot cooker so there was immediately a fire.And the pure oxygen atmosphere had favoured the fire yet (Wisnewski,p.29-30)

-- then peopletried to open the door and could not open the door forhalf an hour to rescue Bondarenko

-- the soles offoot are said not having burnt because Bondarenkowared flight boots (Wisnewski, p.30).

The contradictions:

-- the "SU" atmosphere ships flywith a mixture of oxygen and azotebecause pure oxygen would be a high fire danger
-- fire extinguisher were notinstalled, absolutely unbelievable.

According to Wisnewski thisscenario is not plausible but an upper atmosphere capsule burningduring the re-entry into the lower dense atmosphere seems to beprobable (Wisnewski, p.30).

[But the samefault with a fire in a pure oxygen atmosphere happened inApollo 1. And Bondarenko was brought to hospital in Moscow shortlyafter the accident. So the cooker version in the cosmonaut trainingcenter near Moscow is plausible. A landing from an earth orbit flightnear Moscow and a successful parachute landing with an ejection seatdespite a fire in the cabin is not realistic because the parachute alsohad burnt and disappeared before the landing. Speculations can goon...].

since 1986
AfterGorbachev: The "SU" space engineers admit thedisappeared cosmonauts - the programmatic experts of the West refuserecognizingthe truth

Shortly before1986 Dr. Sergej Khrushchev, the son of the former"Soviet" leader Nikita Khrushchev, becomes an "US" citizen. In 1986Sergej Khrushchev is research assistant at the Brown university. Duringthe "race in the atmosphere" he worked for Vladimir Chelomei, leaderfor rocket engineering, with the task to develop booster rockets andatmosphere ships.

SergejKhrushchev states things that underline the existence of the"unofficial" missions since the 1960s. Other former Sovietrepresentatives give information about the former missions, also themission of Col. Yuri Lyzlov and captain Anatoli Grushenko, in formertimes from the SSRF (Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces). Both weredirectly involved in the "Soviet" upper atmosphere program of the 1960sand1970ies.

They weredirectly part of the preparations of the atmosphere flight ofVladimir Ilyushin and were witnesses of the launch of the capsule"Rossyia". They describe the events in several TV broadcasts ininterviews how they really were [with dead astronauts and crashesetc.].

Some Western"experts" of the "Soviet" atmosphere flight don't want toknow this truth about the "SU" high atmosphere flights an reject theinvitations to discussions. They want to keep their belief on an"inerrant" development of the worldwide high atmosphere flight.

(from:http://www.lostcosmonauts.com/curtain.htm)

[If the Gagarin swindle was officially admitted remains unclear].

1999
Vladimir Ilyushin, first living returned atmospheronaut,lives as retired air force general in a Moscow suburb
(http://www.lostcosmonauts.com/ilyushin.htm)

April 2001
40 year jubilee of the Gagarin "space flight": Gagarinofficially is not the first any more

Tass reports resp. senior research engineer Michail Rudenko reportsthat Gagarin was not the first human in the atmosphere ("in space").The pilots Ledowski, Shaborin and Mitkow were lost between 1957 and1959. Rudenko states that these flights were suborbital parabolaflights (Wisnewski, p.28).

The question remains with which atmosphere ship the pilots had flownbecause Vostok atmosphere ships did not exist [officially] at thistime.
(In: English Pravda12.4.2001;http://english.pravda.ru/main/2001/04/12/3502.html; Wisnewski, p.28).

8 April 2001
The investigation report aboutGagarin's and Seryogin's death: Crash because of weather balloons?

The investigation says:
-- all in all more than 200 people were questioned
-- the MiG airplane was in a perfect condition
-- sabotage should not be determined
-- the fact-finding commission cannot understand why Gagarin and histeacher have not used the ejection seat to save themselves
-- Gagarin took part on a birthday ceremony two days before the crashbut on the day of his last flight he had to pass two medical tests andhe did not fail
-- on Gagarin's body no alcohol was determined.

The fact-finding commission concludes that some registering balloonscaused the crash which could not be seen because of clouds until it wastoo late. The pilots probably had tried a quick evasion maneuver and bythis the airplane began to trundle which was not possible tocompensate. The steering lock angle of the airplane on the groundindicates that they were not far from saving themselves.

According to the officer Ivan Rubtsov, an elder member of thefact-finding commission, the version of the commission with theregistering balloons as cause for the crash is the most probableversion.
(Russiastill starstruckover Gagarin; The Guardian, 8 April 2001;http://www.guardian.co.uk/spacedocumentary/story/0,2763,470371,00.html)

Russian government erected aGagarin Seryogin monument in a birch forest with an obelisk with thereliefs of Gagarin and Seryogin at the alleged place of their crash.

Gagarin-Seryogin-monument in a birchforest in Russia at the alleged location of the crash of 1968

[Well have you ever heard that anyother airplane has come down by weather balloons? Speculations can goon...]

From Voskhod over Gemini to Soyus

2011-10-15T09:04:00.000-07:00

From Voskhod over Gemini toSoyus

Theatmosphere ships Voskhod and Gemini -Reader's Digest about Torre Bert - the first atmosphere-walk with anatmosphere ship "Voskhod 2" - "lunar probes" and "moon satellites" withfirst "moon fotos" - the catastrophes Apollo 1 and Soyus 1 - the "moonfever" and the stupid media

The first officially intact landed"lunar probe" Luna 9: The opened capsule.
But nobody can control if the probe really landed on the moon. Andradio communication
over 380,000 km with earth rotation at the same time is totallyimpossible...

byMichael Palomino (2006)

1964
TheendoftheVostokmissions-Soyusis not ready yet - the "American" atmosphere ship "Gemini" - thethree seater "Voskhod"

A further by Koroliovplanned Vostok flight in 1964 is not performed any more, among othersbecause there is no propaganda profit against the "USA" any more. Since1962 there are projected new atmosphere ships: Soyus and "Vostok Tsch"which both can be steered. But they are not realized because offinancial difficulties. So, variated Vostok atmosphere ships have to beenough for the next few years.
(ProjectVostok,http://www.raumfahrer.net/raumfahrt/bemannt/projekt_wostok.shtml)

Firststeerableunmannedatmospherecapsulesarerealized(programZenith). When "USA" announcetheir "Gemini" atmosphere ships Koroliov lets remove the ejection seatof the Vostok capsules into a special funnel to give place for moreseats. By this there is a three seated Vostok atmosphere ship, named"Voskhod",
(ProjectVostok,http://www.raumfahrer.net/raumfahrt/bemannt/Project_wostok.shtml)

English "Sunrise". Voskhodwithoutejection seat gets space for two or three seat shells. The capsule getsa parachute on the top. Since model "Voskhod 2" there is attached ablow-up airlock for atmosphere-walks which can be removed after use.The possibility for an emergency rescue with an emergency exit iscancelled. Certain crews are flying with this atmosphere ship evenwithout astronaut suit.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voskhod_spacecraft)

Atmosphere ship "Voskhod 2" with parachute capsule andblow-up air lock for atmosphere-walks, model.

"Gemini"atmosphere ship of the "USA"

The Gemini atmosphere ships officially are different from mission tomission with changing of volumes and partitions of the service moduleetc.

(http://www.geocities.com/titan_2_ missile/gemini.htm)

Proportions of Vostok,Mercury and Gemini, drawing.

Withtheatmosphereship"Voskhod"the"SU"regimewants to pretend to the Western block thatthere had been developed a new revolutionary system. But this is notthe case. The Vostok era has ended with it.
(ProjectVostok,http://www.raumfahrer.net/raumfahrt/bemannt/Project_wostok.shtml)

Up to this time the capacity ofthe"Soviet" atmosphere capsules was brought to a maximum. Compared to the"American" Gemini atmosphere ships the "Soviets" had no possibility tosteer their atmosphere ships during the flight or any connectingpossibilities.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

Gemini atmosphere ships have aunique parachute landing in two phases: Suddenly the capsule is goingin an oblique position.

Gemini parachute landing in twophases, drawing.

8 April 1964
"USA":Unmanned mission "Gemini 1"
NASA descriptionGemini Titan mission 1 (GT-1). The aim of a perfect start with theTitan rocket and a sure earth orbit officially can be reached. Thesecond stage of the rocket is officially not separated from Gemini 1.After 4 hours and 50 minutes the aim of three perfect earth orbits isofficially fulfilled. All systems are functioning. The atmosphere shipofficially dies down after 64 earth orbits over the South Atlantic on12 April 1964.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_1)

"Gemini 2" as an unmanned flightwith a landing on earth is officially projected for 24 August 1964.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2)

Middle of August 1964
"USA": "Gemini2" is postponed because of an alleged lightning strike
An investigation cannot find anyfailure.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2)

End of August / beginning ofSeptember 1964
"USA": "Gemini2" has to be postponed several times because of hurricanes
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2)

9 Dec 1964
"USA": "Gemini2" is postponed one second before start
The automatic control unitdetermines a falling pressure in the steering system of the first stage.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2)

19 Jan 1965
"USA":Unmanned mission "Gemini 2" officially successful
NASA description Gemini Titanmission 2 (GT-2). First aim is a perfect landing. For this only a shortflight is necessary. After a height of 171 km and 18 minutes and 16seconds flight "Gemini 2" performs it's splashdown. The heat protectionshield is strong enough.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2)

Now a hatch is added to "Gemini 2" and is re-used another time withinthe espionage program "MOL" in 1966. By this Gemini 2 is officially thefirst reusable atmosphere ship of the world. The espionage programitself officially is only partly executed.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_2;http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned_Orbiting_Laboratory)

March 1965

Corrieredella Sera reports dead "SU" astronauts - Ludmilla / Ludmila Serakovna
Corriere della Sera reports that at the beginning of the "SU"atmosphere flight many "Soviet" astronauts died in space (Wisnewski,p.22).

Above all Corriere della Sera reports the radio communication of womanastronaut Ludmilla. She reported flames during the re-entry into thelower dense atmosphere, and [most likely] she was burnt. She is said tobe burnt in November 1963.
(http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0235.shtml)

Corriere della Seraalso reports the deadly flight of cosmonaut Belokenev in November 1962,another deadly flight of a woman on 10th November 1963, and a deadlyatmosphere flight in April 1964, according to the data of Torre Bert.
(http://www.spacestation.carolan.info/ManInSpace/DeadCosmonauts.htm)

Later the accident with Ludmilla from November 1963 is reset on 16 to19 May 1961 or 19 to 23 May 1961.
(http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0235.shtml)

18 March 1965
"SU": The first officialatmosphere-walk ("space-walk") of Alexei Leonov
With an atmosphere ship "Voskhod 2" "Soviet" cosmonaut Alexei Leonov isofficially performing the first atmosphere-walk of the world.Officially he is in the high atmosphere for 12 minutes and has amaximum distance from the atmosphere ship of 17.5 feet.
(http://space.about.com/cs/basics/a/spacefirsts.htm)

The worldwide firstofficial atmosphere-walk ("space-walk") of Alexei Leonov

AlexanderLeonov on his official atmosphere-walk.

Alexander Leonov.

23March 1965



Gemini 3, start with a Titan booster rocket.

"USA": First double manned "US" mission"Gemini 3" with safe return
NASA description "Gemini Titan 3" (GT-3). On board are John W. Youngand Virgil Grissom. The flight contains officially some tests andscientific experiments which are only partly fulfilled. The flightofficially becomes known by some breadcrumbs of a sandwich whichallegedly fly through the capsule in the zero gravity.

[There may be speculations if it's possible to remove the helmet duringthe flight and to eat sandwiches on board of the narrow capsule. Itseems not possible and the sandwich is a lie to be in the newspapers.And the stupid media believe all to rise their number of copies...].

The flight ends with a splashdown 84 km from the planned landing pointin the Atlantic. The astronauts have to wait 30 minutes for therecovery helicopter. They become sea sick and only get out when theatmosphere capsule gets a "life belt".
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_3)

Beginning of April 1965

Reader's Digest publishes a report about theJudica-Cordiglia brothers and about lost astronauts
Reader's Digest indicates estimations that the "SU" had lost atthe beginning of the high atmosphere flight a minimum of 10 astronauts(Wisnewski, p.22).

Reader's Digest reports that cosmonauts which were driven away fromearth could fly in the space until now in an extreme cold perfectlyconserved (Wisnewski, p.35):

"... that today a Russian astronaut is flying with some 1,000s milesperhour through space quietly - the victim of a Soviet space flight [...]with a perfectly conserved body [...] for centuries a lonely migrant inspace." (Wisnewski, p.35)

(orig.: "... dass heute ein vor langer Zeit verstorbener russischerAstronautmitmehreren 1000 Meilen pro Stunde still durch den Weltraum treibt - dasOpfereines missglückten sowjetischen Raumfluges [...] mit einem durch dieextremeKälte perfekt konservierten Körper [...] auf Jahrhunderte hinaus eineinsamerWanderer im Weltraum." (Wisnewski, S.35)

Reader'sDigest about reports of Torre Bert about lost "SU" astronauts

The data inshort words
-- from 1949 on interest for radio technique, Achille is 16, Gian only10, at Erba near Lake of Como
-- purchase of old US radio equipment of the occupation army
-- 1959 change to Turin
-- 1960-1961: Installations in an old war bunker
-- 1961: Change to San Mauricio Canavese, Villa Bertalazzona, name"Torre Bert"
-- official monitoring stations: England at Jordrell Bank, "USA" atTyngsboro (Massachusetts)
-- the sister Maria Theresia has to learn Russian
-- Gian's fiancée Laura Furbatto coordinates "Zeus" network
-- forecast for tube Lunik IV which misses the moon
-- 28 Nov 1960: radiogram "SOS to the whole World", also received byamateur stations in Texas and Germany
-- beginning of February 1961: Heart beats and respiration of anastronaut in panic
-- 17 May 1961: Voices of a hopeless conversation between two men andone woman
-- space quiz, America trip, presentation of conversation between Glennand "US" control station

Text:
ITALY'S AMAZINGAMATEUR SPACE WATCHERS
By J. D. Ratcliff
April 1965 Withhomemade electronic equipment, two young Italians are keeping tabs onRussian satellites and making some startling discoveries...

Thereisan eerie possibility that a long-dead Russian astronaut is todayhurtling silently through space at thousands of miles an hour - thevictim of a Soviet space shot that went wrong. His body perfectlypreserved by intense cold, he may be a lonely wanderer in space forcenturies to come.

Evidencethat such a macabre voyager may exist comes from an exciting new bandof hobbyists: amateur space watchers. Like the early ham-radiooperators, these talented enthusiasts build their own equipment, oftencreating for a few hundred dollars - out of such cast - off junk aschicken wire, used pipe, second hand radios - instruments that wouldcost a government hundreds of thousands. Their eavesdropping onastronauts and their satellite - tracking achievements are impressiveeven to professionals.

Of themany amateur tracking stations now scattered over the earth, one of themost striking and complete is located in the peaceful little village ofSan Maurizio Canavese, 12 miles outside Turin, Italy. Although much ofthe equipment is either homemade or dates back to World War II, itlooks thoroughly efficient. Inexpensive kitchen clocks on the wall giveGreenwich Mean Time, local time in Moscow, Cape Kennedy and Turin.Operators wear white lab coats. The tracking console faithfully copiesthe one at Cape Kennedy - ingeniously modeled after photographs andscaled down to one fifth size.

Thebuilders of this remarkable station are two brothers, Achille and GianBattista Judica-Cordiglia. They got interested in radio as ahobby in 1949 while living at Erba, near Lake Como. Achille was 16, Gian only10. When they tried to wheedle funds from their physician fathertobuild a shortwave station, he reacted as most fathers would - "Don'twaste time when you should be studying." They had better luck withtheir mother. The U. S. military was then selling off surplus radioequipment at the knockdown price of five cents a pound. The boys bought300 pounds. After rebuilding it to their own needs, they were soonconversing in code with newfound friends the world over.

In 1959the family moved to Turin.Satellite launchings had begun, and the boyswere fascinated. "There was a new world out there," says Gian, "and wewanted to be a part of it." They decided to concentrate on Sovietrather than U. S. space efforts, because Russia was closer, and becausethe Russians were secretive, never publicizing shots in full technicaldetail as the United States does. They installed crude listeningequipment in an old World War IIGerman bunker, and shivered throughthe winter of 1960-61 while they perfected their apparatus. Achillespared all the time he could from medical school; Gian signed up for acorrespondence course in engineering, so he could study at the stationwith his headphones on.

Betterquarters came the next year when their father took over a convalescenthome in a rambling 16th - century villa at San Maurizio Canavese. Nowthe boys christened their station TorreBert (Torre for tower, Bert for VillaBertalazona, theoriginal name of the convalescent home). Theyalready had a number of striking achievements to their credit. Theycould listen to conversations between astronauts and ground stationsfor a few fleeting seconds as the space vehicles passed over Turin. Butthey wanted to listen longer and to be able to track satellites. Thismeant they must have a "movable dish" antenna, which could followobjects across the sky and scoop up even the faintest electronicsignals from space.

Governmentsspend millions for such things installed in elaboratelayouts - Britain spent $4,500,000 at Jodrell Bank, the U. S. Air Force15 million at Tyngsboro, Mass. A Turin contractor offered to build adish antenna for $3200. The boys checked their Torre Bert bank balance- $30. The only solution, of course, was one they had become accustomedto: build their own.

Fromjunkyards they came back with pipe for the antenna framework, an autosteering wheel that could be used to turn it, and truck bearings tocarry the ton - and - a - half contrivance. With extraordinaryingenuity they built other equipment: a 4 - by - 12 foot screen thatwould light up to show the position of a satellite at any given moment;a second screen to follow moon shots; a listening console with threesecondhand recorders to tape messages from satellites. In sum, it was aremarkably faithful model of the tracking control room at Cape Kennedy,the far off wonderland of their dreams.

Lackinga library or funds to buy technical journals, the young space watchershad to invent much equipment already in existence, but about which theyknew nothing. One example was a filtering device to screen out unwantednoises coming in from space. They also developed methods of determiningwhether a signal came from the ground or from a moving vehicle. But oneof their biggest achievements, which required superb detective work,was determining the frequencies of Russian tracking stations. Atpresent they know the frequencies of six of them and can tune in atwill.

Astheirstation grew in complexity, it became clear to Gian and Achille thathelp would be needed for its operation. Fifteen space enthusiasts,mostly in their early 20s, were recruited. The boys' sister, MariaTheresa, a pert and pretty teen - ager, got one of the most difficultassignments. She was to learn Russian so she could translate messagesfrom manned Soviet flights. She is now fluent in the language.
Next,the boys wanted to organize electronic coverage of the entire earth.Gian's fiancée, Laura Furbatto, was given the job of enlisting otheramateur space watchers scattered around the world - from Tahiti in thePacific, to Angola in Africa, to Argentina in South America. Thus the17 - station Zeus amateur network was born, hooked together byshortwave radio. Now, when the operators of the little Italian stationdiscover that the Russians are going through a pre - launch rehearsal,they alert the other Zeus stations so that they can be ready to starttracking when the time comes.

Normallyon a 12-hour schedule, Torre Bert goes on 24 - hour alert when Sovietground stations become active. Every team member has his assigned post:two men monitor voices and signals and make tape recordings; two workthe dish antenna; and one of the most talented members of the team, amath wizard, operates a hand - cranked calculating machine to figurespeed and orbital path. (Professionals use electronic computers). Theteam's accuracy is such that they were able to predict, 12 hours inadvance, that Russia's Lunik IV would miss the moon by 5,000 miles. Theactual miss: 5,281 miles.

Mostman-carrying satellites circle the earth in 90 to 120 minutes. By thetime the second orbit begins, the busy little station has alreadycalculated its basic tracking information, and the screen on the walllights up, showing minute to minute location.

In itsshort span of life, Torre Bert has plucked some remarkable messagesfrom space. On November 28, 1960, for example, there was the crypticmessage: "SOS to the entire world." It came from a moving space vehicleand was repeated three times. Amateurs in Texas and Germany picked upthe same message. Three days later Russia admitted a launch which hadended in failure - but did not mention a man aboard.
On17 May 1961, the voices of two men and a woman were heard in desperateconversation - "Conditions growing worse why don't you answer? ... weare going slower... the world will never know about us . . ." Thensilence. The same words were picked up in Alaska and Sweden. Theirmeaning? No one will know until the Russians choose to talk.

Perhapsthe most moving message of all was a wordless one made early inFebruary 1961. Tapes, which I myself heard at Torre Bert, recorded theracing beat of an over - exerted heart (the hearts of all astronautsare monitored automatically) and sounds of labored breathing. TheJudica - Cordiglia brothers took the tapes to famed heart surgeon Dr.A. M. Dogliotti. His verdict: "This is the heart of a dying man." Thebrothers are firmly convinced that the Russians have spent freely ofhuman life to achieve their space successes. Accumulated evidenceindicates that there may have been at least ten deaths.

Theyoung men of Turin spent a long time admiring the U.S. space programfrom a distance before they finally got an opportunity to see it lastyear. Italian TV put on a space-quizprogram with a $3000 prize. TheJudica - Cordiglia brothers won in a walk and promptly bought planetickets for America. Visiting space centers in Alabama, Florida,Maryland and Texas, they deeply impressed American space scientists."They have done a remarkable job," says Harry J. Goett, director of theGoddard Space Flight Center. At Cape Kennedy the brothers played tapesthey had made of John Glenn's conversations with the ground.Professional spacemen were mystified. The United States never announcesradio frequencies until after a flight for fear of causing trafficcongestion on the particular wavelength. How had the boys determinedthis one? Easy, the Judica - Cordiglias said; they had seen a pre -flight picture of the Glenn capsule and had figured the frequency fromthe size of the capsule's antenna!

Thefuture? The busy little tracking station will be only a hobby forAchille, who now has his medical degree and hopes to specialize inspace medicine. But for Gian, a hobby has become a career. "The furtheryou go with this, the stronger is the urge to continue," he says. Hehopes for a job offer from the United States. Meanwhile, he and hisfellow space watchers around the globe are keeping their eyes on thesky and providing the scientific world with its most striking exampleof amateur ingenuity.

7 April 1965
"SU" answer against Reader's Digest
"SU" propaganda (Radio Moscow) reacts disgusted on the Digestreport. Radio Moscow mentions the Judica-Cordiglia brothers directlyand means:

"Nobody can query the safety of our space ships."

(orig.: "Niemand kann die Sicherheit unserer Raumfahrzeuge in Zweifelziehen." (Wisnewski, S.22).

3 June1965
"USA": Gemini 4 with an officialatmosphere-walk ("space-walk") by Astronaut Edward White II.

Gemini 4: Manned startcapsule, according to NASA before start, foto no. 65-H-910.

The manned flight of the two astronauts Edward H. White and JamesMcDivitt lasts officially several days. With the plannedatmosphere-walk also a new astronaut suit had to be developed.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_4)

The atmosphere-walk lasts officially 22 minutes
(http://www.lib.msu.edu/silverbr/gov_docs/Displaymarch03.html)

or 23 minutes. The splashdown is performed 65 km from the plannedlanding point officially because of problems with the steeringcomputer. Officially an aircraft carrier takes the two astronauts.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_4)

The official atmosphere-walk of AstronautEdward White

Edward White, portrait

EdwardWhite[officially]onhisatmosphere-walk("spacewalk"), with a pipefor oxygen supply and radio communication, with rebound pistol for thechange of direction.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_4)


Gemini 4:Splashdown with a green dye so helicopter pilots can better find the landing capsule, foto no.S65-34044.

Gemini 4 astronautsmeet parachute jumperGagarin, foto no. 65-H-1123

[Thereis noneutral control if Gemini 4 really was performed].

since 1965 approx.
The manipulated school books with the space lies of the"Soviet Union"

Any school book claims now:
-- Vladimir Ilyushin had had a car accident after his landing in China and hadbeen in Mao's China for rehabilitation because of this accident (Wisnewski, p.34)
-- Gagarin had been the "first man in space" though he was only aparachute jumper
-- the dead "SU" astronauts are never mentioned, as well the lies aboutthe Ilyushin flight and the Gagarin "flight" are never mentioned(Wisnewski, p.23).

The "SU" lies as a model for the "USA"
The lies of the "Soviet" regime become a real lying culture andbecome a model for the "USA" to play "moon landings" which never hadbeen performed. But the stupid media greedy for sensations areaccepting all this as also the faked Gagarin flight was acceptedwithout one single original foto of the flight. For the media truthdoes not count but above all the sensation. After the "moon landings"in TV the "Soviet" atmosphere flight consists only of Gagarin and allother things are forgotten forthe Western media. And the truthis called"conspiracy theory"...
(Conclusion Palomino)

21 Aug 1965
"USA": "Gemini 5" with an 8 dayflight - point manoevres
NASA description: "Gemini Titan 5" (GT-5). After an interrupted starton 19 August 1965 liftoff is performed on 21 August 1965,officially with the astronauts Charles Conrad and Gordon Cooper.Officially the flight is all in all one hour too short. It's officiallythe first time that fuel cells are used. A planned rendezvous manoevrewith an aim satellite is officially not successful because of fallingpressure in the fuel cells. By this only fictive points are approachedofficially. After some days some steering engines fail officially.Because of bad weather the splashdown is brought forward by one orbit.There is an aberration of the planned landing point of 145 km,officially by wrong computer data. With 8 days flight Gemini 5establishes a new long time record and overtake the "Soviet Union".
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_5)

29 Aug 1965
Splashdown of Gemini 5
The landing aberration from the planned landing point is according toWisnewski 170.3 km, according to wikipedia 170 km. This precisioncorresponds with an earth orbit flight. The flight seems to be real.
(Wisnewski, p.238-242; http://en.wikipedia.com,Splashdown)

Splashdown of Gemini 5

Gemini 5: Recovery of theastronauts by helicopter, foto no. 65-HC-668.

The Gemini 5 capsulebrought on board, foto no. S65-46630.

[There is noneutralcontrol if Gemini 5 really was performed].

4 Dec 1965
"USA": Start of "Gemini 7" -planned double liftoff with "Gemini 6 A"
On board of "Gemini 7" are officially the astronauts James A. Lovelland Frank Borman. The projected 14 days flight puts new requestsconcerning the concept of the atmosphere ship and further more changes.Officially there are among others medical experiments and a rendezvouswith the remained second stage of the booster rocket. Officially it'sthe first time the astronauts are allowed to remove their astronautsuit during the flight because one astronaut in the astronaut suit andanother in the long underwear brings climatic problems.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_7)

But the liftoff of Gemini 6-A has officially to be postponed by severalreasons. By this "Gemini 7" officially is flying alone in the highatmosphere until the liftoff of "Gemini 6-A" is performed successfully.Then officially a rendezvous is performed.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_6)

15 Dec 1965
"USA": The official rendezvous ofthe Gemini atmosphere ships "Gemini 6-A" and "Gemini 7"
After the start of "Gemini 6-A" officially with theastronautsTom Stafford and Walter Schirra Gemini 6-A and Gemini 7 are performinga "rendezvous". Officially it's the first rendezvous in the atmosphereflight performed by steering engines with a distance of only 30 cm.Officially all manoevres are successful. Gemini 6-A officially returnsalready one day after the rendezvous, with live broadcast of thesplashdown in TV.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_6)

18 Dec 1965
"USA": Officially successfullandingof "Gemini 7" - alleged new long time record
With 330 hours, 35minutes and 1 second flightGemini 7 is officially said having performed a new long time record inthe high atmosphere ("in space"). And this is also the text in theencyclopedias of that time...
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_7(Juli2006)

The facts: Both flights Gemini 6Aand Gemini 7 are a big lie

Gemini 6-AbehindGemini 7, "Rendezvous" in the atmosphere, foto no. S65-63221. It's a photocomposition.

The aberrationfrom the landing point are:
-- Gemini 6A according to Wisnewski: 12,9 km, according tohttp://en.wikipedia.com:Splashdown (August 2006): 13 km
-- Gemini 7 according to Wisnewski: 11,8 km, according tohttp://en.wikipedia.com:Splashdown (August 2006): 12 km.

This precise landings coming from an earth orbit with a landing capsuleon a parachute without steering possibility are impossible. So, Gemini6A and Gemini 7 never flew. The claim of the rendezvous in the highatmosphere is a big lie.The rockets were empty during their liftoffs. Both crews only haveperformed an airdrop over the landing point as it was exercised 1,000sof times in training (Wisnewski, p.238-242).

So, the"long time record" is presented by a lied flight. The lying system ofNASA functions very well. The only thing what is true of the twoflights are the splashdowns... The stupid media believed the claims ofthe flights and spread these lies and are rising their numbers ofcopies with it, and "USA" can claim having established a new record andhaving overtaken the "Soviet Union". What's coming now is clear: Onelie follows the other one...
(ConclusionPalomino)

1966
Torre Bert: Shutdown of themonitoring center of the Cordiglia brothers
The Cordiglia brothers become highly respected experts in cancerresearch and in forensic medicine.
(http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0235.shtml)

1966
Since 1966 the race about moondatabegins - the Van Allen radiation belts
The race about the moon begins with "lunar probes" which are saidhaving sent data to the earth by radio communication which cannot bepossible over a distance of 380,000km and considering earth rotation.The fantasy that men could fly to the moon is provoked by the media ina kind that the "USA" perform "moon landings" in their simulationstudios at Langley and Houston at the end. But the "USA" and the "SU"both know that the Van Allen radiation belts cannot be passed. But theykeep it secret. It's really like this: One lie follows the other lie...
(Observation Palomino)

31 Jan 1966
"SU": Official start of "lunarprobe" Luna 9
(http://www.br73.net/luna_9.htm)

3 Feb 1966
"SU": First official soft landingofa "lunar probe" on the moon: Luna 9
(http://www.lib.msu.edu/silverbr/gov_docs/Displaymarch03.html)

Official "lunar probe"Luna 9

"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Thealleged landing mechanism, drawing.
"Lunar probe" Luna 9, flight position.

"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Thealleged opened capsule on the moon, drawing with inscriptions.

"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Theopened capsule.

"Moon foto" allegedly from Luna 9

[Officially]the "SovietUnion" claims being the first super power having perfect landing on themoon and having fotos from the moon.
(http://www.informatics.org/museum/solsys.html)

The impossibility of lunar probesand moon fotos
There is no neutral control if a "lunar probe" has landed on the moonor not. "Moon landscapes" can be produced on earth easily. Add to thisit's hardly possible that a radio communication with fotos over adistance of 380,000 km is possible, because of the long distance andbecause of the earth rotation. But the stupid media believe all to risetheir number of copies, and when the "President" says it is like thisthe media say it also. And the truth is called "conspiracy theory".This system functions very well...
(Conclusion Palomino)

2 June 1966
"USA": First official soft landingof a "US" "lunar probe" on the moon: Surveyor 1
(http://www.lib.msu.edu/silverbr/gov_docs/Displaymarch03.html)

Official "US" "lunarprobe""Surveyor 1"

The starting booster rocket of "lunar probe" "Surveyor 1"
"Lunar probe" "Surveyor1", drawing withinscriptions.
"Lunar probe" Surveyor 1 standing on earth.

But there isno neutral control if ever a"lunar probe" has landed on the moon. Probably the rocket was empty.But the stupid media believe all to rise their number of copies...

3-6 June 1966
"USA": Big lie about a flight"Gemini 9A"

Officially there is the claim that the crew had been exchanged and theaim had been a docking manoevre with a satellite which could not bebrought into the right orbit by the first trial, and during the secondliftoff of the satellite a peace of the casing of the second satellitehad not opened completely so the docking manoevre had not been possible.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_9)

But according to the landing data with an aberration of only 0.7 kmfrom the planned landing point the whole flight is a lie because with anon steerable landing capsule on a parachute such a landing precisionis impossible or a lucky chance. But the Gemini capsules before hadalso landed with a precision within a range of 10 km. So the flightGemini 9 is again a big lie. The rocket started empty, and the crewperformed an airdrop as it was trained 1,000s of times in trainingalready (Wisnewski, p.238-242).

The stupid media believe all, they report about the "dramatic" eventswhich officially are reported and by this they can rise their number ofcopies. According to the data situation the only thing which is true isthe splashdown...
(Conclusion Palomino)

Gemini 9A in an earthorbit, faked foto(foto no. S66-37989), probably afoto shortly after theairdrop taken from the cargo aircraft. The strong rope is visible yet.Or it can be a foto composition, too.

14 Aug 1966
"USA": The "moon satellite" "LunarOrbiter 1" allegedly making "moon fotos" and fotos with an "earth rise"
(http://www.lib.msu.edu/silverbr/gov_docs/Displaymarch03.html)

notpossible over a distance of 380,000 km considering a moon orbitof the "moon satellite" and considering the earth rotation.

Lunar Orbiter 1:Alleged first detailed "moon fotos" from a moon orbit - an alleged"earth rise"

Start of the booster rocket of "Lunar Orbiter 1", foto no. L-1966-06381, probably the rocket is empty.

"US" "Moon satellite" "Lunar Orbiter 1".

"Moon foto " of "Luna Orbiter 1", craterlandscape, alleged air foto,probably from LOLA planetarium.

"Moon foto" from "Luna Orbiter 1", allegedearth rise seen from a moonorbit, probably from LOLA planetarium.

According to the technicalpossibilities it's impossible to transmit fotos over a distance of380,000 km from a moon orbit on a rotating earth. And a neutral controlis not possible...

LOLAmoon model at Langley near Hampton (Virginia), foto of 1.8.1965, fotono. L-65-5579. With this modelyou can make many beautiful "moon fotos", even with a little railwaywith camera to simulate moon orbits...

The planetarium at Langley with a big moonmodel

According toWisnewski all fotos of the Surveyor missions can be a fake. Thenumeration of the alleged earth rise foto with an "L" stands for thesimulation center at Langley near Hampton (Virginia). According to thisnumeration the foto was made with the big moon model "LOLA" from theLangley Research Institute.

(In: James R. Hansen:Spaceflight Revolution: http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm;Wisnewski,S.286,288-289)

It's easy toproduce a foto with an "earth rise": You make a "moonfoto" from the moon model, then you paint out the background with blackcolour, and you take an "earth" into the background, and this is theperfect "earth rise". It's this simple, and it's cheap. The cheapestsolution mostly is the most likely one...

(ConclusionPalomino)

August 1966

"SU": Gagarin is nominated as back-up pilotfor the planned mission Soyus 1
Pilot is Vladimir Komarov.
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruzwyshn/HTMLFolder/Gagbio.html)

1966-1968
Official "SU" historiography:Gagarin serves in the Council of Nations of the Supreme Soviets
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruzwyshn/HTMLFolder/Gagbio.html)

28 Nov 1966
"SU": First Soyus flight: Theatmosphere ship officially is missing: "Cosmos 133"
Planned is an unmanned double mission with two Soyus atmosphere ships.The Soyus atmosphere ship has the possibility to steer with steeringengines and the possibility to dock, developed since 1963.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

Soyus atmosphereship, drawing withinscriptions

The first unmanned start of aSoyusatmosphere ship under the camouflage description "Cosmos 133" is afailure. The position of the Soyus atmosphere ship in the earth orbitis not stable. Because of this failure the second Soyus atmosphere shipstays on the ground an is not started. The first Soyus ship threatensto land in China because the landing engines could not be startedseveral times. Officially the ship is never recovered. A selfdestruction is never reported. The "SU" regime plans a second Soyusstart for 14 December 1966.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

14 Dec 1966
"SU": The second unmanned Soyusatmosphere ship remains on the ground - explosion
The firing of some engines of the booster rocket fails. The rocketremains on the ground. During the defuel operation of the fuel [whichis highly corrosive] the rescue tower catches fire. The rocket is undercontrol put on fire. But then the rocket explodes. Minimum one deathvictim.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

1967
"SU": Gagarin's visit in Bulgariawith decoration
The Gagarin adoration for the parachute jumper keeps on and on. In 1967Gagarin is honoured in Bulgaria as the first foreigner with the title"Hero of the Peoples Republic". At that time Gagarin's wife is workingas a staff member of a big medical laboratory of the Yuri Gagarincosmonaut training center.

Juri Gagarin, elder ca. 1967, with deformed left eyebrow.

January 1967
"USA": Apollo 1 catches firebecauseof a pure oxygen atmosphere and sparks and short-circuits



The threeastronauts who were murdered on Apollo 1: Grissom, White and Chaffee.Until today "USA" rejects any neutral investigation and all facts whichdon't fit into the NASA version are determined as "conspiracy theory".But facts cannot conspire...

Amanned NASA testwith the disabled Apollo 1 capsule in a pure oxygen atmosphere with aplug out test to test the independent current supply ends in adisaster. For reasons of time there is no unmanned test before. Butalready before 1967 there have been heavy accidents in the "USA" withpure oxygen atmospheres with death and injured victims. By all thisit's not at all understandable why NASA performs the test in this kind.The fire can be foreseen, the manned test in a pure oxygen atmosphereis a suicide squad and at least it's negligent homicide. Warningindications from NAA security inspector Thomas Ronald Baron arerejected by NASA and the engineer company North American Aviation(NAA). NAA dismisses him after his report.

The test is not successful, first two times because of acid milksmell in the capsule, then because of interrupted radio communication.At the fourth test trial the astronauts report smoke in the capsule,but the test is not stopped and the oxygen atmosphere with overpressureis started. The control center has the sign of warming batteries whichis sign for a short-circuit, but the test is not stopped. After 10minutes smoke suddenly a fire breaks out, allegedly because of ashort-circuit. of the main switch. But a spark of a normal switch onthe switch board without special short-circuit is more likely. Duringthe fire the plastic chained binding develops toxic gases.

The capsule is not at all prepared for the case of a fire. The hatchcan be opened only to the interior side, and withoverpressure in the cabin it's not possible to open it. And the lifekeeping systems maintain the overpressure. After 5 minutes only thehatch is opened from outside. The astronauts have passed out but areliving yet.

By incomprehensible reasons NASA boss Gilruth is blocking anyconnection to the launch pad, a gagging order. Doctors are coming. Theyare said the astronauts would have died and by this the doctors may noteven see the bodies of the astronauts and are sent away. Any First Aidis missing. The astronauts have passed out but are living yet anddevelop a lethal pulmonary edema by the toxic gases. The development ofpulmonary edemas needs some hours. After 6 hours only the deadastronauts are taken from the burnt capsule. The NASA procedure isthreefold murder.

A neutral fact-finding commission is not admitted but the bosses ofNASA and NAA are investigating together and covering themselvestogether. The ex safety commissioner of "North American Aviation"(NAA), Thomas Ronald Baron, presents at the hearing of the Congresscommission a report with 500 pages with the aim to stop the dangerousApollo project. Baron gets the answer: He is probably killed togetherwith his wife and his stepdaughter. An autopsy is never performed.Officially the death of the Baron family is presented as "an accidentat a level-crossing". In the following time also the widow of astronautWhite is murdered. She officially commits suicide but never wasdepressive or in danger of committing suicide. Probably she "spoke" toomuch. So there are three murders and four suspicions of murder againstNASA in connection with CIA and NAA. A neutral investigation nevertakes place, but the facts are called "conspiracy theory"...
(A detailed presentation of the fire of Apollo 1 and the NASA murdersyou can find here).

Wikipedia declares the short-circuit with insufficient cables: Thecause for the short-circuit were the Teflon coating of the electriccables in combination with the aluminium structure of the cable forms.Defect cables can provoke electric arcs and fire in combination withaluminium. And the nylon of the astronaut suits was too easilyflammable.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1)

"SU": Planned double mission
The "SU" regime means to be able to overtake the "USA" with doubleSoyus flights with docking manoevres in the high atmosphere.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

7 Feb 1967
"SU":Thethird unmanned Soyus atmosphere ship: Also "Cosmos 140" crashes
The start under the description "Cosmos 140" is wellperformed but theposition in the earth orbit is not stable. The re-entry into the loweratmosphere is steeper than planned. A radio transmission failureprovokes that air is put out of the return capsule. [By this thecapsule looses weight]. The heat protection shield burns through[because the re-entry lasts too long]. At the end the capsule[officially] crashes in the Aral Sea. Divers [officially] can recoverthe capsule.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)



Vladimir Komarov, portrait.

[Nobody can control what really happened.The version can be right orwrong].

23April 1967
SU: Planned double mission: Startof "Soyus 1"
Soyus 1pilotis Vladimir Komarov. Gagarin isback-up pilot.
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruzwyshn/HTMLFolder/Gagbio.html)

A second Soyus atmosphere ship (mission "Soyus 2") is planned to starta day later on 24 April 1967. But one of the solar panels of Soyus 1is not opening. The atmosphere ship also cannot be steered right so theonly opened solar panel gives too less current. Because of lack ofcurrent the landing is foreseen soon. The short wave radio is notfunctioning right. There is only a connection on USW when the "SovietUnion" is overflown.
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

24 April 1967
"SU": Crash of "Soyus 1" -death of Komarov because the parachute is not opening

Because of bad weather the second atmosphereship "Soyus 2"[officially] stays on the ground. By this a hand repair of the solarpanel of Soyus 1 is not possible [officially]. After 16 earth orbitsKomarov's first trial to fire the landing engines of "Soyus 1" fails[officially]. After 18 earth orbitshe succeeds to fire the landing engines by hand [officially]. In aheight of 7 km theparachutes should open themselves but they don't [officially]. By thisthe landingcapsule of "Soyus 1" is crashing with 40 m/s [144 km/h] on the groundand Komarov cannot survive this [officially].

The reason of the not openingparachutes is found afterwards[officially]: From thefixed heat protection shield some glue flew into the parachute case andhad fixed the parachute on the casing [officially].

(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sojus_1)

Komarovis reported as the first dead of an atmosphere flight ("death by worldspace travel").
(http://www.lib.msu.edu/silverbr/gov_docs/Displaymarch03.html)

Gagarin isnominated by the "SU" regime for pilot of the first manned mission tothe moon (Soyus 3) to restore confidence into the "Soviet" atmosphereflight.
(http://bellsouthpwp.net/r/u/ruzwyshn/HTMLFolder/Gagbio.html)

Soyus 1: The officialwreckage of the landing capsule after the crash.

Funeral ofVladimir Komarov on theKremlin wall.

Conclusions by MichaelPalomino:

The lying culture of the "SU" and the "USA" is established - the new"moon fantasy"
The lying culture about "spaceflight" which can be only an atmosphere flight because of theradioactive Van Allen radiation belts in a height of 200 to 1000 km isestablished in the propaganda machineries of the super powers. The"lunar probes" and "moon satellites" are pretending to mankind the factthat also humans could reach the moon. A global "moon fantasy" isspread, a "moon feever".

The lot of accidents in the year 1967 indicates that the atmosphereflight is very dangerous and that the technical devices are notavailable. But since 1968 suddenly "moon flights" without any accidentshall have been possible.

For the "Soviet Union" Gagarin shall save the "Soviet Union" with a"moon flight" and lead from the Soyus crash, and the "USA" afterthe Apollo 1 catastrophe are just in the same situation. So, bothsystems have to perform a "moon landing" to be able to present a"cleared" balance to the population. The political pressureprovokes many "moon fantasies" and any device is permitted for it.

But it's not possible to get to the moon because of the highradioactive Van Allen radiation belts and because of the cosmicradioactive radiation of the sun, otherwise humans get cancer at once.The moon has no protective atmosphere and is likely highlyradioactively contaminated. And during the time of 1968 to 1972 the sunhas an active phase with many sunspots and high radioactive cosmicradiation. Until today no astronaut had cancer directly after a "moonflight", and only one single astronaut got cancer at all. There issomething wrong, but the stupid media believe all when the "President"is saying it, and the number of copies has to be risen...

This is noconspiracy theory, stupid journalist, but these are facts. You don'tbelieve? The facts remain. Facts cannot conspire.

The worldwide firstofficial atmosphere-walk ("space-walk") of Alexei Leonov
AlexanderLeonov on his official atmosphere-walk.	Alexander Leonov.

The official atmosphere-walk of AstronautEdward White
Edward White, portrait		EdwardWhite[officially]onhisatmosphere-walk("spacewalk"), with a pipefor oxygen supply and radio communication, with rebound pistol for thechange of direction. (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemini_4)
Gemini 4:Splashdown with a green dye so helicopter pilots can better find the landing capsule, foto no.S65-34044.	Gemini 4 astronautsmeet parachute jumperGagarin, foto no. 65-H-1123

Splashdown of Gemini 5
Gemini 5: Recovery of theastronauts by helicopter, foto no. 65-HC-668.	The Gemini 5 capsulebrought on board, foto no. S65-46630.

Official "lunar probe"Luna 9
"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Thealleged landing mechanism, drawing.	"Lunar probe" Luna 9, flight position.
"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Thealleged opened capsule on the moon, drawing with inscriptions.	"Lunar probe" Luna 9: Theopened capsule.	"Moon foto" allegedly from Luna 9

Official "US" "lunarprobe""Surveyor 1"
The starting booster rocket of "lunar probe" "Surveyor 1"	"Lunar probe" "Surveyor1", drawing withinscriptions.	"Lunar probe" Surveyor 1 standing on earth.

Lunar Orbiter 1:Alleged first detailed "moon fotos" from a moon orbit - an alleged"earth rise"
Start of the booster rocket of "Lunar Orbiter 1", foto no. L-1966-06381, probably the rocket is empty.	"US" "Moon satellite" "Lunar Orbiter 1".
	"Moon foto " of "Luna Orbiter 1", craterlandscape, alleged air foto,probably from LOLA planetarium.	"Moon foto" from "Luna Orbiter 1", allegedearth rise seen from a moonorbit, probably from LOLA planetarium.