911-Toasted Cars

Toasted Cars
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html#toasted  Introduction

A reported 1400 vehicles were damaged on 9/11. These vehicles had peculiar patterns of damage and some were as far away as FDR Drive (about 7 blocks from the WTC, along the East River). Vehicles had missing door handles for example, windows blown out, window frames deformed, melted engine blocks, steel-belted tires with only the steel belts left, and vehicle front ends destroyed with little or no effect on the back end of the vehicles. What could have caused such extraordinary damage? Portions of cars burned while paper nearby did not.

Figure 64. Peculiar wilting of car doors and deformed window surrounds on FDR Drive.

Figure 65. Map of lower Manhattan shows the WTC and FDR Drive a half mile or more apart. Arial view of lower Manhattan.

Figure 65a. Notice the dust-covered car in front of the toasted police car. There is also debris on the pavement away from the main part of the road. They probably couldn't clean it very well because the toasted cars were there.	Figure 65b. Notice the dust-covered car behind the toasted police car. There is also debris on the pavement away from the main part of the road. So, it appears the roadway has been washed already

Figure 65c. Notice the two dust-covered cars under the bridge. How did the dust fall there? Obviosly there were strong enough air currents to put it there. It's interesting how the drying pavement looks like it does after its been treated for snow and ice. (This is thought to be the entrance ramp to the Brooklyn Bridge from southbound FDR Drive.)

Figure 66. Toasted cars in a lot near the WTC.	Figure 67. Blistered car on FDR Drive with unburned upholstery and unburned plastic window molding.
Figure 68. Front half of a car burned with a shiny, unburned rear end.	Figure 69. What burned and dragged these cars and mangled the left rear wheel? Where are the door handles?
Figure 70. What was this thing across the street? Was it a car? Was it a van? What caused that line of burn marks on the hood of the car in the foreground on the right? In the left foreground, the remains of a vehicle sit atop a white sedan. Are we looking at the front or the back end? It looks like the front end and if it is, its engine is missing. We can see daylight through the wheel well.

Peeling Appearance

Many vehicles had their outer surface peeled away like a sardine can. In some instances, clearly there is more than peeling paint was involved. It appears that the sheet metal delaminated as though something caused the material to melt or disintegrate at a certain depth. In some cases it appears that there was more heat damage inside than outside and vice versa.

Figure 71. What happened to the axles, wheels, and tires? On the doors, it appears that a heavy layer of paint peeled down from the top, yet the paint on the lower part of the doors has not been peeled away. Wow did the wheel get under the rear suspension?	Figure 72. The car with the flat tire appears to have "wilted" from heat, from the top down, leaving a peeling appearance on the back end. The SUV on its right is missing all its window glass except for the windshield. The vehicle on the far right has no trace of tires, no door handles, no tail lights, and no windows. Why?
Figure 73. The peeling on the side door appears to be delaminated. Sheet metal is not laminated, so why would it do this?	Figure 74. Why does this ambulance have melted inside doors? The inside looks to have suffered more heat damage than the outside. What would cause that?
Figure 75. Oddly enough, there were also toasted cars at the Pentagon on 9/11.	Figure 76. This is the same vehicle shown in the previous figure after the fires were extinguished. Why is the passenger door burned? Note how the hood is curled up.

• Other Anomalies 

The pictures below document a wide variety of damage to vehicles, including total incineration of vehicles, toasted and disappeared engine blocks, steel-belted tires with no rubber and only steel belts, deformed wheels, missing grills, broken and missing vehicle windows and mirrors, no door handles, wilted doors, and unburned paper next to burning cars.

Figure firetruck. A badly damaged fire truck. Where did its engine go? The bottom of the tire has turned to goo below a distinct horizontal line in the tire.	Figure hazmat. A FDMY Hazmat truck in front of WTC6 on West Street. The remaining upper part of the truck has been peeled and evaporated in areas. The upper part of the cab is gone and the engine block seems to have disappeared. The photo was taken on 9/11 after WTC1 disappeared but before WTC7 collapsed. (9/11/01)
Figure 66(e). Why would the front of this fire truck wilt?	Figure 66(h). Is there something attractive about engine blocks? Why not gasoline fuel tanks?

Figure 77. The mail truck parked on the left side of the street looks burnt. Why? (Click on photo for enlarged view.) The building on the left is the USPS Federal Building and on the right is WTC7. WTC5 is on fire at the end of the street. Why? If this area is hot enough for spontaneous combustion, why isn't the paper on fire? The cars on the right side of the street are also toasted.	Figure flip. Why is this car upside down? A burned out SUV with missing windows and toasted front end is parked in front of WFC2 on West Street but will not be moving under its own power. (9/12/01)

Lower Manhattan

Figure Map. Arial view of lower Manhattan.

FDR Drive

Figure 66(a). Cars along FDR drive were randomly toasted. These cars are at least 1/2 mile away from the WTC. Note the waviness of the tire tracks. What happened?	Figure 66(b). Wheels appear to have steel-belts from the tires still on them.
Figure 66(c). Did one car run under the other during the event or were they stacked after the event? The marks in the pavement suggest they were pushed to the side of the road.	Figure 66(d). The remains of a steel-belted tire without the rubber. This is a close-up of the figure above.
Figure 66(j). The front end of this FDNY car is toasted and mildly deformed, while the door appears undamaged and the window glass is intact. The debris on this car suggests it was near the WTC.	Figure 66(f). While the bodies of these toasted vehicles still exist, they've been incinerated. All of the softer materials inside and out have disappeared.
Figure 66(k). This Toasted Interior was consumed except for the fire extinguisher.	Figure 66(l). The front half of car 2723 is toasted, but check out the new wax job on the back. Notice the missing front door handle and the untouched back door handle.
Figure 66(m). What happened to the top half of car 1250? The doors are crinkled up, but the rear tire looks OK.	Figure 66(n). There is extensive damage to the front of car 2723, including no door handle on the driver's door. There is an unusual, unburned circular area on the rear door.

Towed?

In the debate over toasted cars ignited by this article, some have argued that the wrecked vehicles on FDR drive were damaged at the WTC and were loaded up and transported and dumped on FDR drive for storage. First, there is no evidence that this was done. Second, it makes no sense to load up wrecks, transport them, only to dump them in a busy thoroughfare for storage. These wrecks would have had to be picked up yet again and transported again. If vehicles were truly moved from the WTC to FDR Drive, we wonder why WTC steel beams were not stacked up on FDR drive, as well, if it was such a good storage area. Third, governments may be stupid, but we doubt they could be this inefficient. If reported, it would have been a minor scandal. Fourth, we might be wrong about the facts here, but it looks like the motive for this speculation about shifting wrecks around lower Manhattan is to protect the official story or thermite story or other pet theories. We fail to see any other explanation for such a "forced" interpretation for these photographs. Fifth, marks on the roadway suggest that some of these vehicles were pushed to the side of the roadway until they could be removed. This is a more natural explanation for why some of the cars appear to have been moved from where they were damaged rather than all the way from the WTC.

• Burning Cars 

Figure 66(g). This fire seems to be very selective.	Figure 66(i). A minivan is consumed by flames. The fire rages inside the vehicle, contained by the remaining windows. The fire appears more intense at the front where the engine is.
Figure onfire1. The tires and even the pavement under the car are on fire. The windows appear to be intact with no visible interior fire. There is line of fire along the trunk lid. The right front fender is deformed and has turned white.	Figure onfire2. A fire rages, apparently on Vesey Street, sending up thick black smoke. These may be the vehicles that eyewitness Rebecca O. described as she ran past WTC6 during the destruction of WTC2.

• Missing Windows 

Figure 66(o). Why doesn't the paper burn?	Figure 66(p). No window? What happened to the rear-view mirror?
Figure 66(q). Why is the rubber window gasket hanging outward?	Figure 66(r). Sans windows. (But nice tire!)
Figure 66(s). Why is the paper shredded but nothing else apparently disturbed?	Figure 66(t). What blew out the windows without damaging the rest of the fire truck?
Figure 66(u). The window gasket is on the outside. What blew out the windows? What dislodged the front grill?	Figure 66(v). It didn't blow out just the middle portion of the windows; it blew out the windows all the way back to the frame where it was mounted.
Figure 66(w). Hosing down the windowless fire truck.	Figure 66(x). Final cleaning of the windowless fire truck. Notice its grill is missing.
Figure 66(y). What could have caused such extensive damage to this car? Has the passenger side shoulder harness survived? Where's the steering wheel?	Figure 66(z). Why is this fire truck burnt? It is missing its front grill, headlights, and related front end bright-work. Where are the tires?

Most of the 1400 toasted cars had some, if not all, windows missing. What would cause this? Figure yy, below, shows a silver convertible with its top apparently intact but missing some of its window glass. If the windows were blown out from pressure inside, we would expect the convertible top to have been torn or blown off. This suggests that the windows were not blown out by internal pressure, but may have been shattered by some other mechanism.

Figure yy. The cars parked in the back suffered extensive damage. The car on the left and on the far right look like they have had their engines eaten. The cars in the foreground experienced less damage, but many windows are missing, however partial and whole windows also remain. (9/12/01)	Figure 78. Why is this windshield crumpled up? Curiously, the interior of the car does not appear to contain anything that crashed through the windshield.

---

Toasted Parking Lot

Figure toast1. afterWTC2 was destroyed there don't appear to be any fires. (9/11/01)	Figure toast2a. The cloud from the destruction of WTC1 rolls toward the parking lot. (9/11/01)

Figure toast2b. Just after WTC1 is destroyed, fires start to burn the vehicles in the large lot, but not the paper. Why? (9/11/01)

Figure toast3. The vehicle fires increase in strength as sunling begins to emerge through the clearing dust cloud. (9/11/01)	Figure toast4.The air upwind of the WTC has visably become clearer. The vehicle fires continue increasing and flames can be seen. (9/11/01)

Figure 5. The air has cleared after the destruction of WTC1. This area would be first to clear as it is upwind of the WTC. The fire in the toasted lot has increased in strength, consistent with it having just been started. (9/11/01)

Figure toast6. Sunlight begins streaming through the intersection. (9/11/01)	Figure toast7 The intersection and the grasssy lot are covered with paper and dust that did not burn. So, what caused the vehicles to suddenly catch fire? (9/11/01)	Figure toast8. How did these cars catch on fire? (9/11/01)

Figure street9(a). Gone with the Wind At the corner of West and Vesey, looking south toward the WTC complex. WTC1 was just destroyed and the people are cautiously emerging from their hiding places and slowly approaching the site with puzzled looks on their faces. "Where'd it go?" This appears to be about the same time as that of the previous three figures. (9/11/01)	Figure street9(b). Gone with the Wind A view west along Vesey street across the West St. intersection. The toasted parking lot is on the right in the distance. This is after WTC1 was destroyed. Sunlight is visible on WFC3 (on left). Paper in the foreground is not on fire. Why are vehicles in the parking lot on fire at some distance away? (9/11/01)

Figure toast10. Toasted cars in the lot northwest of the WTC complex. There is little visible rust, so the photo was probably within a day or two of 9/11/01. (9/?/01) Source: (WRH)	Figure toast11. Not much visible rust, yet. (9/?/01)

Figure toast12. The rust is noticeable (9/23/01) Source: (JW cut down from NOAA)

Figure toast13. A lot more rust (9/?/01)	Figure toast14. Towing finally begins. (9/?/01)

Figure toast15. Presumably these cars are finally being towed away from that lot. Those wheels look fairly good which means they probably aren't steel. (9/?/01)	Figure toast16. The background is near the WTC (9/?/01)

Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation

Pictures Prove Mini Nukes Caused 9-11 Devastation
http://www.drjudywood.com/

There are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (pictured above).

A volcanic eruption OR A thermo nuclear detonation

On the morning of September 11th, 2001, we were told a fairy tale. That wide body jets flew into the twin towers and completely destroyed them. Let me repeat that: Passenger planes (large hollow aluminum tubes) flew into industrial steel, marble and concrete sky scrapers, and caused them to turn into a pile of dust. And the worst part about this fairy tale is that we, the American people believed it. Now, nine years later, it’s time to wake up from your slumber and take a good hard look at what did and did not happen on that fateful day. The conventional explanation we were provided, by government and media, for a top-down highly destructive gravitational collapse, in near-free-fall times, is physically impossible, and is thus about as worthy of discussion as is the belief that the Earth is flat.

FICTION: Passenger jets flew into the Twin Towers, and the burning jet fuel caused them to collapse.

FACT: The Twin Towers did not collapse. They suffered a mid-air pulverization due to an extreme unconventional energy source that caused the initial upward trajectory of so much of the towers’ mass during the ‘collapses’ as (supposedly only) gravity was pulling them down.

FICTION: The burning jet fuel melted all of the steel beams causing the buildings to collapse directly onto their own footprint.

FACT: 80% of each of the towers 50 million ton mass NEVER hit the ground. The steel did not melt, but turned into nano-dust. Pulverization + Molecular Dissociation = Ground ZeroEvidence. When matter is elevated to temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun,molecular dissociation results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma. Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.

 

What do these two pictures have in common? They both represent a highly unconventional destructive release of energy, with temperatures much hotter than the sun.

So once we confirm evidence of widespread molecular dissociation having occurred at Ground Zero in New York City, we have a very strong indication that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy which suddenly appeared just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters”.

In a “pancake collapse” the rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the original building height (12.5%). The actual rubble pile was no more than 2% of the original building height. Both towers went “poof.”

So where did these 110 story tall 50 million ton sky scrapers go?

They were turned into nano-dust and 80% of the “dust” floated off into the atmosphere.

From left to right: A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to “dust” and blows away.

Now that we’ve scientifically proven that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy to cause the pulverization and molecular dissociation of these buildings, let’s look at some of the other unexplainable anomalies..

1400 VEHICLES melted NEAR WTC

All of these cars have unexplainable similar damage: Paint gone, instant rusting, and all of their door handles and engine blocks are missing!

BELOW; A squad car on FDR drive with wilted doors, burned paint, instant rust and no door handles or engine block.

Strange fires appear to be attracted to the engine blocks, while the gas tanks and nearby paper are not affected.


Buildings a few blocks away, had mysterious holes in the windows, and the front marble façade is completely gone, but no other damage.

Why doesn’t the paper burn?

For months we witnessed trucks coming and going from Ground Zero and the media told us they were hauling away the steel. What steel? There was very little steel left in the rubble because it had been pulverized into nano-dust. So what were these trucks really hauling back and forth? Dirt! They hauled in dirt, spread it all over Ground Zero, then scooped it up and hauled it away, and this went on for years. Didn’t they do that at Chernobyl? Yes they did!

So now you know what didn’t cause the buildings to “vanish.” Planes, jet fuel and thermite are irrelevant. So what kind of unconventional energy could have caused the Twin Towers to turn to dust? A fissionless fusion thermo nuclear event? Direct Energy Weapons? HAARP? A scaled up weaponized version of The Hutchison Effect? The investigation continues………

9/11 FIREFIGHTERS-RADIATION CANCERS KILL 345 SO FAR

9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off the Scale”

April 4, 2011 posted by Veterans Today
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/04/04/911-nuke-demolition-proof-firefighters-radiation-cancers-off-the-scale/

 

RADIATION CANCERS KILL 345 SO FAR

9/11 FIREFIGHTERS ARE GETTING CANCER AT A FASTER RATE THAN OTHERS, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER REVEALS

By Daily Mail Reporter
Firefighters who recovered bodies at Ground Zero are developing cancer at a faster rate than those who worked before the atrocity, medical officials have revealed.
A seven-year study by the New York Fire Department has claimed that there are ‘unusual rises’ in the number of cancer cases among firefighters who worked in the aftermath of 9/11.
Some types of cancer among 9/11 firefighters are even ‘bizarrely off the charts’, according to sources who have seen the as-yet-undisclosed federal-funded study.
Dr. David Prezant, the Fire Department’s chief medical officer, has reportedly said that cancer cases across ‘all ranks’ of the FDNY who worked at Ground Zero are ‘up significantly’.
It is thought that the report – due to be officially disclosed in time for the 10th anniversary of the terror attacks in September – cites unusual rises in leukemia, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma.
The report also states increases in esophageal, prostate and thyroid cancers.
Although officials have yet to confirm the increase, sources who attended a recent steering-committee meeting said Dr. Prezant’s report will document the cancer increase.
One source told the New York Post: ‘The only conclusion that could have been reached was that there was an increase in the cancer rate for firefighters after 9/11.’
Minutes of the meeting quote Prezant as saying that ‘we have completed our seven-year cancer study’ and that he planned to present it to the fire unions.
A doctor from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is said to have asked Dr. Prezant: ‘In the past, you mentioned about the rates before being somewhat similar — what led to the change that you noted the increase?’
Prezant said researchers have compiled medical records for three years and had access to state cancer registries, though New York’s is three years behind.
Dr. Prezant reportedly told the group: ‘Those things keep adding cases
The report would be the first to document a cancer-rate increase among rescue and recovery workers.
The city recently settled lawsuits by 10,000 WTC workers, more than 600 of whom have developed cancer.
But officials have so far insisted there is no scientific proof that Ground Zero smoke and dust caused cancer.
An FDNY spokesman gave a statement for Dr. Prezant, saying: ‘The study is ongoing, and no conclusions have been reached on whether cancer rates have increased for firefighters.’
But fire union bosses in New York have expressed their concern about the findings.
Al Hagan, head of the fire-officers union, told the New York Post: ‘I’m led to believe that the numbers for those cancers across all ranks in the Fire Department of people who worked at Ground Zero is up significantly, and we’re all very concerned about it, as are our families.’
Steve Cassidy, president of the firefighters union, said Ground Zero’s ‘toxic stew’ has proven lethal.
He said: ‘It’s a fact that New York City firefighters are dying of cancer in record numbers.
‘We have buried 10 firefighters in just the last 15 weeks, seven with cancer. On Sept. 10, 2001, they were young, healthy firefighters.’
In 2007, doctors at Mt. Sinai Medical Center, which monitors World Trade Center rescue workers, noted blood cancers like multiple myeloma, which normally strikes in the 60s or 70s, were being found in relatively young officers.
The New York state Health Department has confirmed that 345 Ground Zero workers have died of various cancers as of June 2010.

Remember Beita …. Remember Awarta

Remember Beita …. Remember Awarta

Reham Alhelsi

My Palestine, April 17, 2011 Remember Beita? Beita; the beautiful, steadfast Palestinian village? Beita; the warm houses, the green fields and the olive trees? Beita; the villagers working their lands, the children playing in the streets? Beita; the smell of Taboun bread, the singing of birds with every Palestinian morning? Remember Beita? Beita; the land stolen by Zionist colonists? Beita; the homes demolished by Israeli occupation militias? Beita; the hundreds thrown into the dark dungeons of Zion? Beita; the martyrs murdered in cold blood? Remember Awarta? Awarta; the picturesque, steadfast Palestinian village? Awarta; the ancient arches, the wavy weadows and the olive trees? Awarta; the villagers harvesting the fields, the youth dancing the dabkeh? Awarta; the taste of Za’tar and Zeit, the feel of fresh breeze with every Palestinian morning? Remember Awarta? Awarta; the land stolen by Zionist colonists? Awarta; the homes demolished by Israeli occupation militias? Awarta; the hundreds thrown into the dark dungeons of Zion? Awarta; the martyrs murdered in cold blood? The story of Beita is the story of many Palestinian villages, the story of many Palestinians. But Beita is also the story that is seldom told and, although Beita occurs over and over again, it is seldom remembered. The story of Beita begins with the Zionist occupation and colonization of Palestine. Hundreds of beautiful Palestinian villages erased off the face of the earth to create a myth of "those who made the desert bloom". Thousands over thousands of Palestinians were expelled from their homes and their lands to create a myth of "a land without a people for a people without a land". Hundreds of massacres committed against civilian populations by terrorist militias that continue to commit massacres in the name of "self-defence". Beita, the beautiful Palestinian village was to witness death, expulsion, demolition, confiscation and detention so Zionist colonists can have more Palestinian land to occupy, more Palestinian land to colonize. On 8:30 of the morning of 06.04.1988 a group of Zionist colonists from the Zionist colony of Elon Moreh stopped outside the Palestinian village of Beita. The group consisted of children and their armed guards. One Palestinian resident, Tayseer, tried dissuading the settlers from entering the village and offered to show them an alternative road around the village. The Zionists refused, and by that time, some villagers who were working in the fields had gathered to see what the colonists wanted and why they had come to their village and homes. One armed Zionist guard, Rumain Aldubi, who was a known fanatic and violent colonist and the leader of the Nablus cell of Gush Emunim, ordered the residents of Beita to leave. As Tayseer turned to leave, the guard shot him in the stomach and the leg. And while the villagers were trying to find refuge, he continued shooting around him and killed Mousa Daoud Bani Shamsi (20 years). The colonists then went down to the village and were met by the rest of Beita villagers who had heard the shooting and come to investigate. Some residents of Beita suggested keeping the colonists there until the Israeli occupation forces came and then to hand them the murderers of Mousa. Others were in favour of letting them go. And while the villagers argued, the guard Aldubi began shooting again and killed Hatem Fayez Ahmad Jaber (22 years). According to the residents, one of the settler children, Tirza Porat, tried stopping Aldubi from shooting. She grabbed his arm and told him that what he was doing was terrible. It was then that he shot her. Bani Shamsi’s mother who was present hit Aldubi on the head. When he fell unconscious to the ground, the resident took his gun and that of the other guard and laid them on the ground until the IOF came. In the meantime the residents took care of the Zionist children and protected them. When the Israeli occupation army finally arrived, it was 10:30. The first thing the Israeli occupation forces did was declare Beita a closed military area, so no one was allowed to leave or enter and no media was allowed into the village. The Israeli occupation forces had decided that Beita was to be blamed for the death of settler girl, although no Palestinian owned a gun and she was killed by one of the settler guards, and that Beita was to be punished. A curfew was imposed and the village school was turned into a detention centre and hundreds of residents were detained from their homes. One Beita resident, Isam Abdel Halim Mohammad, 15 years, was shot dead by the IOF as he fled the village during the detention raid. On that same day, tens of olive trees were uprooted and 5 Palestinian homes were blown up. The IOF told reporters at the time that they couldn’t establish a direct link between the "killing of the settler girl" and the demolished houses, i.e. the houses were chosen randomly to be demolished as a collective punishment of the whole village for a murder the villagers didn’t commit. Another 8 Palestinian houses were blown up the next day even after an Israeli military report found that it was in fact Aldubi’s gun that killed the girl. One of the houses demolished belonged to a family which protected the settler children. The Israeli occupation army report confirmed that the bullet in the girl’s head was from Aldubi’s gun, the same gun that killed the two other Palestinians as well. The report noted also that when the guns were grabbed by the Palestinians, after the settler had killed the Zionist girl and the two Palestinians, their magazines were empty. It also confirmed that the Palestinians had in fact protected the settler children. Demolishing Palestinians homes and detaining Palestinians was not enough, Beita was to be punished more. 6 residents of the village were expelled from occupied Palestine as a further collective punishment for a murder committed by a settler. Even after the release of the Israeli military report, the Zionist entity continued accusing the Palestinians of killing the girl and stealing the guns from the guards. Israeli politicians, settler leaders and others claimed first that the Palestinians grabbed the guns and killed the settler girl and injured another 15. Then they claimed that the settler girl was stoned to death and that the 15 were injured by stones. And despite the military report, they called for the death penalty for "those who killed the girl" and the deportation of all youth in Beita. They also called for revenge and for a brutal action against the Palestinians of Beita. Israeli minister of religious affairs at the time said that Beita doesn’t exist on the map anymore and that a settlement called Tirza Porat should be built in its place. During the funeral of the settler girl Kahane signed autographs. What happened in Beita is only one example of the nature of Zionism and Zionist colonists: they killed innocent civilian Palestinians for the sake of killing Palestinians. They killed a Jewish girl, then blamed the murder of the girl on the Palestinians and incited against them. And in the end it was the Palestinians who were punished for a crime they didn’t commit and punished for being the victims of this Zionist terrorist act. No Zionist colonist was ever punished for the murder of the 3 Palestinian residents of Beita. And the story of Beita is the story of Awarta. Awarta; the beautiful Palestinian village, until Zionist colonists came and destroyed its lands to build their alien colonies. Awarta; the peaceful Palestinian village, until the Zionists came and stole its land and terrorized its people. Beita and Awarta are one in pain, in suffering, one is steadfastness. Beita and Awarta are two Palestinian villages that pay the price of crimes committed by Zionists and blamed on Palestinians. Everyone in occupied Palestine, especially those on whose lands illegal colonies are built, knows that it is impossible to enter a Zionist colony and leave without being searched and interrogated, let alone enter and allegedly kill settlers and manage to leave alive. Even Palestinian workers who are given permits to work in some settlements are thoroughly searched, escorted and closely watched during their work. One doesn’t even need to enter a Zionist colony to be interrogated or harassed, just passing by a settlement makes one a possible target of settlement guards. Even when walking in your own land, working your own land, endangers your life if your land is close to a Zionist colony. Palestinians farmers working their land close to Zionist colonies would be attacked, brutally beaten and often shot by Zionist colonists. Palestinian children playing on their family’s land close to Zionist colonies would be attacked and shot by Zionist colonists. Zionist colonists attack villagers, attack cars and buses, attack Palestinian homes, attack farmers and when villagers try and defend themselves they get shot at or arrested by the Israeli occupation forces and the settler militias. Zionist colonists attack Palestinian villages, kill Palestinians and it is always the Palestinians who are punished. The settlers are on the other handed rewarded; their illegal settlements expand and more Palestinian land is confiscated. Itamar, the Zionist colony built on the lands of Awarta, is not different from other Zionist colonies. It is even more secured than some other settlements. It is like a high-security prison with video surveillance system that monitors the area day and night and observes every single movement in the colony and around it and with sensors that alert the guards to any attempt to break into the colony. No one comes close to the settlement without being seen or targeted. One example is the murder of two Palestinians from Awarta almost a year ago. Israeli soldiers guarding Itamar murdered Mohammad Faisal Qawareq (19) and Salah Mohammad Qawareq (19) who were working their lands close to the colony. And as with Beita, the story of Awarta began long before 11.03.2011. It began with the Zionist occupation and colonization of Palestine. Two-thirds of Awarta lands were confiscated to build the Zionist colony of Itamar, "home" to terrorists who terrorize Palestinian families day and night, murder Palestinian farmers, demolish land, uproot trees and destroy water wells. But on 11.03.2011, a new crime was to be committed against Awarta, one of a large scale. And while most media outlets concentrated and continue to report on the killings in Itamar and blame them, without any evidence, on the Palestinians, the crimes committed daily against Awarta are largely ignored. On Friday, 11.03.2011, five members of a Zionist colonist family were killed in the Zionist colony of Itamar. Motives are unknown, assailant are unknown. Nonetheless, the Zionist entity rushed to blame this on the Palestinians, as if no Israeli would kill another, as if no Israeli would fight with another. And Zionist media and co. rushed to condemn the Palestinians, without evidence, without the "innocent until proven guilty" slogan we keep hearing, for what the terrorist Zionist entity says shall be; and the Zionist entity says that the Palestinians and only the Palestinians shall be blamed for every crime committed under the sun. Immediately, without evidence, without a single clue, Awarta, the Palestinian village on whose land Itamar is built, was invaded by large numbers of Israeli occupation soldiers who set up checkpoints around the village. The village was besieged, all its entrances closed, a curfew was imposed and the area was declared a closed military zone which means no media is allowed into the village. A wide-scale military operation was declared as Israeli military helicopters and drones accompanied the siege. The first of many waves of arrests started in the early hours of Saturday, home to home searches were conducted, accompanied by sniffer dogs, and some 20 Palestinians were detained. During these house raids, residents were aggressively inspected, furniture was destroyed, personal property smashed, cameras confiscated and cash and gold stolen. On Monday morning, 14.03.2011, under the cover of a continued curfew and siege, Israeli occupation soldiers called for all residents aged 15 to 40 to gather in the yard of the village school, where over 300 people were detained. According to a report of the Imemc News: "all boys and young men were ordered to report to a local school, at which point they were split into two groups of approximately 150 persons each. One group reported that they were held for around 2 hours in a square in the village, followed by 13 hours inside, during which the detainees were not allowed the use of bathroom facilities, were not allowed to receive the food residents took to them, and were not allowed to drink water. During this detention young men were repeatedly beaten for speaking against this treatment, with those doing so taken to an unknown detention facility. Three young men, one a child aged sixteen, who are brothers of a man from Awarta who was murdered by the Israeli military last year, were blindfolded, handcuffed and thrown to the ground, at which point the military personnel began to fire live ammunition on the ground around the bodies. These three persons are still detained. A man, reported to be mentally ill, was attacked by a military dog, used for the search of explosive materials, whilst walking in the street."[1] Houses were raided again and some homes were searched and targeted more than three times. Residents report that "soldiers had been searching for cameras, photos and images of destroyed houses."[2] At the time, some Thai workers employed at Itamar, were rounded up and interrogated. It is worth mentioning here that "reports began to surface that the murdered family had owed an immigrant worker, of Thai nationality, the sum of 10,000 shekels for services rendered, and that upon refusing to pay the money owed, the worker had threatened to murder the family if they did not settle the debt."[3] Nonetheless, it was the Palestinians of Awarta who were being targeted and collectively punished. It was the residents of Awarta who were accused of the killing without any evidence, but just for being Palestinians. One resident, Samer Awwad, who was detained for hours, said that "Israeli interrogators, without any legal warrants or court rulings, are interrogating the residents, and that they start the interrogation by stating "you are accused of killing Israeli citizens in Itamar, where were you that night?"[4] And as siege and curfew continued, medicine and basic food supplies were running short. Ambulances were initially not allowed into Awarta, and later given limited time and access inside the village. In one incident, ambulances were "prevented from accessing some patients including a one-year-old girl suffering an asthma attack".[5] Also, ambulances were not allowed to transfer all sick people to the hospital. While one 75-year-old Awarta resident who was beaten by the Israeli soldiers was allowed to be transported, two elderly women with heart problems were prevented from leaving the village. Meanwhile, Zionist colonists continued their terror attacks on Awarta, and in one incident dozens of masked colonists attacked the village and threw stones and empty bottles at the homes injuring a number of people. They also uprooted over 100 olive trees and destroyed 4 water tankers. And to confiscate what is left of Awarta land, under the excuse of commemorating the slain settler family (again no evidence whatsoever they were killed by Palestinians), the Zionist colonists of Itamar declared that they will expand the colony and create an outpost in the name of the slain settler family. Caravan homes were installed on land privately owned by Palestinians from Awarta and Nablus and settlers were seen driving bulldozers and preparing to set up greenhouses. And after almost a week of curfew and siege, on Wednesday, 16.03.2011, Israeli occupation forces withdrew from Awarta, leaving behind huge damage to homes and property. According to one report: "Senior officers used the four day curfew to train younger soldiers as to tactics used during searches, explicitly instructing them to damage property."[6] Within this time hundreds of Palestinians were detained and at least 40 Awarta residents remain in detention, although no suspects were identified or charged. But this was not the end of the story, for the Zionist entity had decided from the beginning that the Itamar killings were to be blamed on no one but the Palestinians, with or without evidence. For there is much more political win to make if the Palestinians were portrayed are the "murderers"; more land confiscation, expansion of illegal colonies, mass arrests, house demolitions and, not to be forget, whining to the world about being "an island of peace among a sea of terrorists". And to continue the charade of "investigating the killings" aka collective punishment of Palestinians for something there is no evidence they committed, the Israeli occupation forces raided Awarta again on Tuesday, 22.03.2011, and imposed a new curfew for the 2nd time in a month. A third raid was followed on Tuesday, 29.03.2011, and while 40 Awarta residents were still in detention, around 60 others were taken from their homes, subjected to forced DNA testing and their fingerprints taken. During a fourth raid on Tuesday, 05.04.2011, another 6 residents of Awarta were detained, and on Thursday, 07.04.2011, in a 5th raid, the village was stormed just before midnight, curfew imposed and more than 100 women were detained, many taken by force and some in their 60s, along with tens of men. Residents report that the Israeli occupation army came accompanied by a number of buses in which the women were transported to Huwara military camp. Detaining elderly women is just another proof that the IOF had decided that it is the Palestinians to be framed for the killings and maybe they thought that elderly people would collapse and confess to something they didn’t do. And with the detention of over a 100 women, the Israeli occupation forces maybe hoped to force Palestinians into confessing to something they didn’t commit. Um Adam, an elderly Awarta resident detained together with her 80-year-old husband and 3 of her married daughters and their husbands said: "An interrogator accused me about the murdering of five settlers in Itamar. I answered him that I am a seventy-year-old sick woman, that it would be fanciful to believe that I could have been involved … then they took my fingerprints and released me four hours later in the early morning cold". .. "Umm George said her family home was ransacked five times. During the raids, she said all of the family members were detained and interrogated including she and her husband. Samples for DNA testing were taken and fingerprints were copied. Her sons George and Hakim remain in the custody of Israeli forces, she said. Every time the soldiers raided the house, they turned everything upside down, during the fifth raid, she said she and her teenage daughter were detained. That time, she added, a sound bomb was launched into the home before they were taken away." [7] On Sunday, 10.04.2011, morning raids resumed in Awarta and with every raid property was destroyed and residents beaten. One Awarta resident, Um Majdi, reports: "They brutally beat my sons; Majdi, who is 21, Amhad, who is 19, and 17-year-old Hakam. They beat them for no reason, they handcuffed my husband and broke everything inside the house; windows, the refrigerator, the washing machine and kitchen appliances. The spilled oil, sugar, salt and flour all together on the floor."[8] On Tuesday, 12.04.2011, three Awarta residents were kidnapped from their apartments in Ramallah. Israeli occupation soldiers surrounded the building where the three live, and forced all residents, including the children, out in the cold from 3 am till 9 am. Two of those kidnapped are brothers, one of whom suffers from kidney failure and requires medical attention. He was staying in Ramallah for treatment sessions and his brother accompanied him. On the same day, in a renewed raid on Awarta, the house of Awwad family was occupied by the IOF and 20 members of the family were detained, including 10 children and a pregnant woman. "One of the women required medical assistance after fainting earlier, but the Israelis prevented an ambulance from reaching the house from 9 a.m. until 11:30 am".[9] No Palestinian faction claimed responsibility for the killings in Itamar and all Palestinian factions stated they don’t target children. But although no evidence whatsoever was ever presented or any Palestinian was ever charged with the Itamar killings, the Zionist entity blamed the Palestinians from the very beginning, and with the exception of the brief detention of some Thai workers, refused to consider any other suspects or any other reasons for the killing and even put a gag order on the investigation and prohibited the publication of any information on it. And amidst a complete lack of evidence, Awarta has been repeatedly raided since 11.03.2011. and the timeline of repeated raids and mass arrests in Awarta is an example of what many Palestinian villages face whenever Zionist colonists or Israeli occupation militias attack Palestinians. It is always the Palestinians who are blamed, it is always the Palestinians who are punished. Immediately after the killings at Itamar, Netanyahu gave a green light for the construction of 500 more settler homes "in retaliation" and on 12.04.2011 he approved construction plans for building more settler units in Itamar. Since 11.05.2011, some 500 Palestinians from Awarta were kidnapped from their homes and detained by the Israeli occupation forces, including some 200 women and elderly, sick people and children. Today, no less than 71 people remain in detention without charges, including two elderly women, a 15-year-old girl, who was detained with her father and mother and brother, and 5 children. Remember Beita … Remember when Palestinians were blamed for a crime committed by Zionists in broad daylight. Remember every time Palestinians were blamed for terror actions committed by the Zionists themselves. Despite Palestinian outcry, it is often that the truth comes to light long after the Zionist entity had made enough political win from these crimes committed by Zionists themselves and blamed on the Palestinians. Remember Beita and think of Awarta. For Awarta is not the first Palestinian village to be blamed and punished for a crime without evidence. Awarta will not be the last Palestinian village to be punished and pay the price for a crime without evidence. And it wouldn’t surprise me if false "confessions" were extorted under torture, just so the Zionist entity can continue to blame Palestinians for everything. For the Zionist entity did it before and will do it again because we live in a world that hears, sees and says nothing when Zionists commit crimes against the Palestinian people and against humanity. We live in a world that will readily take the word of the oppressor over that of the oppressed, the word of the occupier over that of the occupied, the word of the killer over that of the victim, the word of a Zionist over that of a Palestinian. The world might believe the lies and myths of the Zionist entity, might for the time being, but we will continue to tell the truth and we will continue to expose the lies of the Zionist entity because no injustice lasts forever and one day justice will prevail.

Banking Cartel is the Cause of Humanity's Woes

"The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" by Eustace Mullins

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies." ---Thomas Jefferson

In November 1949, Eustace Mullins, 25, was a researcher in Washington DC when friends invited him to visit the famous American poet Ezra Pound, who was confined at St. Elizabeth's Mental Hospital and listed as a "political prisoner."
A leading figure in Modern English literature, Pound was the editor and critic who introduced the world to James Joyce, W.B. Yeats and T.S. Eliot. During the Second World War, he was charged with treason for broadcasts on Rome Radio that questioned the motives behind America's involvement.
Pound commissioned Mullins to examine the influence of the banking establishment on U.S. policy. Mullins spent every morning for two years in the Library of Congress and met with Pound every afternoon. The resulting manuscript, "The Secrets of the Federal Reserve" proved too hot for any American publisher to handle. Nineteen rejected it. One said, "you'll never get this published in New York." When it finally appeared in Germany in 1955, the U.S. Military Government confiscated all 10,000 copies and burned them.
Thanks to the American Patriot Friends Network, this book is freely available on line. (I recommend you save it on your desktop, as I did.) Why is it so (excuse the pun) inflammatory?
Essentially it paints a picture of the world, and the role of the United States, which is radically different from the one we are given in school or in the media.
"Notwithstanding the war of independence against England," writes Mullins, "we remained an economic and financial colony of Great Britain." Between 1865 and 1913, he says London bankers led by the Rothschilds used agents such as J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller to gain control of American industry and organize it into cartels.
Where did these bankers get the money? For over 200 years, European bankers have been able to draw on the credit of their host countries to print it!
In the Seventeenth Century, the moneylenders and the aristocracy made a pact. If the king would make paper currency a liability of the state, the moneylenders would print as much as he liked! Thus the Banks of England, France and the Reichsbank came into being but they were all private corporations and remain so today.
According to this nefarious pact, the moneylenders got to charge interest on assets they created out of thin air. The aristocracy all took shares in the central banks plus they got to finance a burgeoning government and to wage costly wars.
This piece of chicanery is at the heart what plagues humanity.
The bankers have a vested interest in the state (i.e. the people) incurring as much debt as possible. They are behind the Marxist, socialist and liberal movements which call for big government and social spending. They are behind the catastrophic wars of the last century. The Warburgs financed the Bolshevik Revolution. The Bank of England financed the rise of Hitler. Prescott Bush (W's grandfather) was head of Brown Brothers Harriman, which financed the construction of the Nazi war machine.
Naturally if you can create money out of thin air, your first instinct is to buy tangible assets with it. There is a powerful impulse to use debt to control nations and take over their real assets. This is the essence of the so-called Third World Debt crisis. Dedicated to owning all wealth and enslaving humanity, an irresistible vampire has been unleashed uponthe world
Much of Mullins book is devoted to the subterfuge by which the United States was drawn into its lethal embrace. In 1913, the Owen-Glass Bill gave mostly foreign-controlled banks (posing as "the Federal Reserve") the right to create currency based on the credit of the United States government and to charge it interest for doing it!
To accomplish this, the bankers had to rig the election of 1913 in order to get Woodrow Wilson elected. Then their stooges in Congress passed the legislation on December 22 after their opponents had gone home for Christmas.
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust [cartel] on earth," Congressman Charles Lindbergh said at the time. "When the President signs this bill; the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed."
Mullins explains that the legislation passed just in time for the American people to finance World War One. After maintaining standing armies for 50 years, European powers no longer could afford the luxury of another war. But the U.S. was relatively debt free and made the whole thing possible.
What would WWI have been without Germany? Apparently Germany was not self-sufficient in food and would have had to sit out this war. In the nick of time, the bankers organized something called "The Belgium Relief Committee" which channeled billions of dollars worth of U.S. meat and potatoes not to Belgium but to Germany. When Edith Cavell, an American working in a Belgium hospital pointed this out, British intelligence had the Germans arrest and execute her.
Mullins makes a convincing case that every U.S. President since Wilson has been a lackey of the bankers. J.F. Kennedy was assassinated because he started to print his own U.S. government-backed currency. This is also the transgression that led to the murders of Presidents Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield.
Last year alone, the American people paid $360 billion in interest to the bankers. To maintain this massive fraud, the bankers enforce an iron grip on the political and cultural organs of the nation. According to Mullins, "The New York Times" is owned by the Kuhn Loeb while "The Washington Post" is owned by Lazard Freres. In Europe the Rothschilds own Reuters as well as the French and German news services.
I presume US publishers, TV networks and movie producers are similarly beholden. Rockefellers, Carnegies and the Fords endow the nations' libraries and universities. Journalists and professors dutifully parrot fantasies about democracy and freedom. Mind control laboratories run by the CIA and the British army (TheTavistock Institute) dream up ways to manipulate and undermine the population. The psychological sterilization of the human female ("feminism") is an example.
The "War on Terror" is part of the banking cabal's plan to consolidate its grip on humanity in a friendly (or not so friendly) "New World Order." They want to secure their political, economic and social grip on the obstreperous Muslim world, as well as build up a security apparatus in case the docile populations of the West become restive.