The Irish Savant : the Rykestrasse Synagogue in Berlin

Can somebody please help me? I seem to be going insane.

We know what happened to the Jews in Germany during WWII.  They were mercilessly hunted down, to the last man woman and child, and, after a Death March, were killed in the gas chambers of Auschwitz or Belsen or wherever. In fact wherever the Germans went the same thing happened, from Paris to Moscow, from Vilnius to Belgrade.

How do we know this?  Well everybody knows it, from hundreds of films, thousands of books, dozens of Holocaust museums, millions of church sermons, from every approved history of the period.  So that seems clear enough.

But then I come across this, an excerpt from the history of the Rykestrasse Synagogue in Berlin, written by a former Head Rabbi at that institution. (Hermann Simon (Die Synagoge Rykestraße (1904–2004), Berlin: Hentrich & Hentrich and Stiftung Neue Synagoge Berlin / Centrum Judaicum, 2004, (Jüdische Miniaturen; vol. 17)).

 “The Jewish school in the front building was forced to close in 1941. However, the Jewish community formally remained proprietor of the site. In May 1942 the borough of Prenzlauer Berg declared its will to acquire the site paying the ridiculous sum of reichsmark 191,860 and with effect of 1 September 1944 the site was conveyanced to the borough. When on 6 May 1943 the Jewish community applied at the Gestapo for a sale permission, since all its property was under custodianship as were any sales proceeds, it named the Heeresstandortverwaltung I Berlin (German Army garrison administration no. I) as the tenant of all the site, except of two little apartments in the front building still rented out to residential tenants.”

So here we have, according to the Rabbi of the synagogue in question:

in the middle of World War II,

the Jewish community,

negotiating,

with the Gestapo,

for the sale of their synagogue,

which happens to be down the road from Hitler’s HQ.

Now tell, am I going insane, or have I momentarily stepped outside The Matrix? And what's that green man with the TV aerial ears doing looking in my window?

The Irish Savant : "You're a Holocaust denier!"

"You're a Holocaust denier!"

Such was the charge levelled against me in a conversation with friends and acquaintances last Tuesday evening.  Am I?  Well, you be the judge as I lay out my position.

1. The Jews in Europe did indeed suffer a Holocaust in which vast numbers of them were killed and otherwise lost their lives during WW II.

2.  The numbers come nowhere near the mythical (and it is mythical) figure of six million. I don't know what the number was, maybe nobody does but I suspect it was closer to a tenth of that figure.

3. Other peoples suffered a Holocaust as well during this time, at least as bad as that suffered by the Jews. I have in mind the Poles, Russians, Ukrainians and of course the Germans themselves. The ratio of Tutsis slaughtered in Rwanda dwarfs the ratio of Jews killed in their Holocaust. Yet Jews have cornered the genocide market.

4. There was no plan to exterminate Europe's Jews.  The plan was to get them into work camps, slave labour camps if you will, and at the end of the war expel them to Israel, Uganda, Madagascar or the steppes of Russia.

5. The majority of Jewish deaths resulted from the actions of the Einsatzgruppen and their local allies.  These forces operated behind German lines after Operation Barbarossa to suppress local resistance.  Such resistance was strongly associated with Jews who were in any event an easily identifiable target. Vast numbers were murdered and buried in mass graves. The local forces allied to the Einsatzgruppen undoubtedly took the opportunity to settle many an old score as part of the process. Typhus outbreaks in the camps were also a major contributor...possibly the largest.

6. The idea of the gas chambers as a form of mass slaughter is a complete fabrication.

7. The piles of skeletal bodies as seen in the iconic photos from Belsen and elsewhere represented the victims of typhus and starvation, the latter brought on by the bombing of German supply lines.

I have not arrived at these conclusions casually or quickly. I truly believe that they represent what really occurred.

The Irish Savant : Has Snowden failed the 9/11 Litmus Test?

Has Snowden failed the 9/11 Litmus Test?

The 9/11 Litmus Test is a powerful tool, the objective of which is to establish the real bona fides of prominent figures. It's a simple test based on the following principle: He who assigns responsibility for the 9/11 attacks to fanatical Muslim 'pilots' seizing the planes and crashing them into buildings is at best a coward, at worst a fraud. I make this bold assertion because the evidence against such a simplistic explanation for 9/11 is simply overwhelming.

I used to see Edward Snowden as a true patriot and hero. But his interview with Brian Williams of NBC seriously undermines this view.  Here's an excerpt: “You know, and this is a key question that the 9/11 Commission considered. And what they found, in the post-mortem, when they looked at all of the classified intelligence from all of the different intelligence agencies, they found that we had all of the information we needed as an intelligence community, as a classified sector, as the national defense of the United States to detect this plot.”

Well, duh!  As one commentator observed 'if he is implying we should believe somebody who knew about 9/11 was not actually planning it, then Snowden is a psiops plant.'  Sadly, or so it seems to me, that's just what he's implying. We also have to ask ourselves why he used a Jewish lawyer (Glen Greenwald) as his conduit who now, quelle surprise, is planning to write a best seller about Snowden's revelations. Or those revelations deemed fit to print.

There are other troubling aspects. You see, like all American media, NBC is totally in thrall to the government (the Real Permanent Government, that is).  The RPG could have stopped this interview with a finger click. Yet they left it go ahead despite, as we're constantly warned, Snowden's possessing information hugely damaging to American interests.  And Snowden, as well as glossing over 9/11,  never said anything about the elephant in the room, the Zionist control of America's political and national security systems.

Here's a possibility, albeit pure speculation on my part. Given that more and more people question the official 9/11 fairy tale, and given the explosive (!) impact of the truth's emergence, could there be a plot whereby a whistle blower who 'has seen everything' reveals 'all'.......and this 'all' happens to support the official 9/11 version, and as a bonus turns a blind eye to broader Zionist shenanigans?  Think about it. For the sake of a little bit of collateral damage a lot a boxes would be ticked.

Will we ever know?

The Irish Savant : THE USS LIBERTY MEMORIAL

In case you were wondering about ZOG....

Everyone on this site must have heard of the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty during the Six-Day-War in 1967. Just to recap, the Liberty, which was focused on intelligence-gathering and thus lightly armed, was attacked by Israeli Mystere jets using machine guns and napalm, and by attack boats which hit the ship with several torpedoes. As survivors scrambled for safety the Israelis strafed the lifeboats with machine gun fire. All the evidence to hand makes it clear that the Israelis knew that the Liberty was American although the motives of Moshe Dayan, who ordered the attack, remain unclear to this day.

Nothing illustrated the validity of the ZOG (Zionist Occupation Government) charge than this incident and the American reaction to it. For a start while the two hour attack was in progress "Defense" Secretary Robert McNamara called back a US rescue mission, stating 'President Johnson is not going to war or embarrass a close ally for the sake of a few sailors'.  Leaving the callousness aside, and the fact that the same President used 'an attack on a few sailors' (Tonkin incident) to declare war on North Vietnam, the reluctance to 'embarrass' a country that was in the process of murdering your servicemen beggars belief.

But what really blew my mind was the story of the Grafton Memorial.
This relates to the privately-funded memorial library to be established in the city of Grafton near Milwaukee twenty years after the attack. As was and still is required in the Land Of The Free, the Israeli connection was played down with the focus almost exclusively on commemorating those who had served and suffered.

Now you'd imagine that local Jews would have at worst kept their heads down, at best supported the project while apologising for the Israeli 'mistake'.
Not a bit of it!  Instead the attack dogs were unleashed, crying - you've guessed it - 'anti-Semitism'.
Rabbi Gideon Goldenholz declared it 'insulting to Jews' while James Fromstein of the Milwaukee Jewish Council proclaimed the Liberty incident(!) to be a 'sensitive subject considered offencive to Jewish people everywhere'

I swear I'm not making this up.


But it gets better. The local press turned on the Outrage Button. An editorial in the Milwaukee Journal thundered  'where is the outrage in Grafton?  Why is there no outcry?' 
Now let me be clear, because we're talking about an upside down world here. The requested outrage and outcry were against the idea of commemorating American servicemen who had given their lives for their country, because such commemoration might offend the sensitivities of the people who cost them their lives!


But it gets better still. The full machinery of the national and local government was brought to bear on the memorial organisers.  An $83,000 federal donation was withdrawn, an invitation to the White House to send a representative was ignored (as was a personal invitation to GHW Bush), the local high school refused to provide a band for the opening ceremony, denouncing the organisers as Nazis, while the Commander of a nearby Naval Training Centre was ordered not to attend by Naval brass.

Remind me of ZOG again....

The Irish Savant : "Fair Play For Israel"

"Fair Play For Israel"

In this post (BELOW) I showed that Jews, despite masterminding the Affirmative Action agenda, never sought to avail of its provisions for themselves, especially those relating to racial quotas.  Such selflessness! But that's no surprise. And you know, the same thing is going on with the share out of the coveted Third Worlders that so enrich Western society.

Week after week, month after month, year after year prominent Jews and Jewish organisations work assiduously to ensure that we in the West get more than our share of Third World enrichment.  Like this guy in Norway, this lady in Sweden, this one in Germany. And of course "our own" Alan Shatter, el supremo.  They explain in great detail, how we benefit.  You know, colour, different foods and.......and......well, can't think of anything else off-hand just now. Yet, in a stunning example of selfless altruism, they never seek any for their own homeland, Israel.  Have you noticed that?

In fact so selfless are they that in some instances they even try to steal Israel's existing enrichment and bring it back to their "own" countries.  Yes indeed. "Australian" MP Michael Danby proposed to the Canberra Parliament that Australia should absorb all of Israel's African enrichers which would then enable Oz to celebrate even more diversity. What a rosy picture he painted! And only in the last few days the Israeli Government reluctantly agreed to hand over for resettlemnt in Sweden a large number of Eritrean enrichers (including 54 birthing units women) to a jubilant Swedish delegation.

So, seeing as they won't help themselves then I'm going to do it for them. I now propose that every Western country present Israel with a generous proportion of its own refugees. I know it's hard giving up so many of our Nigerians, Somalis and Afghans but it's only fair. Share and share alike is my motto. If successful my project will lead to a new more vibrant Israel which can celebrate diversity as if there was no tomorrow.  Which of course there might not be......

===========

 

Common justice demands Affirmative Action for Jews

As every schoolboy know, Jews have been to the forefront of civil rights, diversity and Affirmative Action from Day 1.  The ACLU, $PLC and various other Jewish pressure groups have assiduously examined employment statistics and developed complex mathematical formulae to determine each ethnic grouping's appropriate representational level.   

But never for themselves. 

And this of course is entirely attributable to the legendary altruistic, selfless pursuit of the common good that we've come to associate with Jews.  The worry themselves sick about justice for blacks, Muslims, lesbians, Hispanics, but never for themselves.

Well dammit, if they won't do it for themselves then I will!  And I'm starting here and now.  Common justice demands it.  They have waited, mute but hopeful, for long enough.  So here's my plan.  As for every other minority an examination of Jewish representation will be undertaken at all our enterprises and institutions, and, applying the prevailing  formulations, the appropriate Jewish representation level will be calculated. 

As a broad guide for AA and diversity purposes we can assume that in Western countries they make up 1% of the population.  Ok, I know, it's less than that.  But let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Oy vey, they've suffered enough already.

So for example the US Senate should have at least one Jewish Senator at all times. It's only fair.  And banking too.  Every ten years or so a Jew should be appointed to head up a major bank.  And they'd be entitled to a few in the higher ranks of the HeBeBC BBC as well. In any event I think we should find out the figures.  And if there are fewer (or in  the unlikely event of there being more) the correct quota - as calculated by existing methods - should be applied.  Same with academia, in fact everywhere.

To my Jewish friends and colleagues I say I'm not looking for your thanks or plaudits.  Just like with you, my sense of fair play dictates my actions. And I'm sure we all can look forward to the day when representation fully and accurately reflect the ethnic mix of our communities.

Agreed?

 

===============

 

The Irish Savant : There 'must' be a new Swedish identity

There 'must' be a new Swedish identity

By any yardstick Sweden has been the most advanced nation in the world over the last 100 years. Virtual elimination of poverty, cradle to grave welfare for all its citizens, one of the highest per capita incomes, among the world's lowest levels of crime and corruption, the development of a whole range of world-beating enterprises and iconic brands, major scientific, sports and arts accomplishments....all in a nation of eight million people. No wonder it  has consistently been near the top of the Human Development Index since its inception.

You'd imagine then that its citizens wouldn't exactly be clamouring for radical change.  But apparently it's urgently needed, according to Liberal Party MP Jasenko Selimovic.  It seems Sweden must 'forge a new national identity' to reflect the vibrant and diverse society it has now become. Now let's think of a really diverse and vibrant country as an example. What about Bosnia?  That's got a heady mix of ethnicities and religions. And they've been slaughtering one another for centuries, right up to the nineties which witnessed the Srebrenica massacre.  Only the presence of a large multi-national force prevents them from flying at one anothers' throats to this very day. Go through the list of Swedish accomplishments at the beginning. Bosnia is at the opposite end of each and every one of them.

Now, by happy coincidence, Mr. Selimovic is also from Bosnia, so it's fair to say he can speak with some authority on national identities. And not just Bosnia. Selimovic also refers to Somalis, Nigerians and Afghans who 'don't consider themselves Swedish' (imagine that!) and that they won't be 'successfully integrated' unless this new national identity is formed.  We are given to assume then that Sweden could do with becoming a bit more like Bosnia, leavened with further enrichment from Somalia, Afghanistan and Nigeria.

Fucking wonderful idea, Jasenko.  How did you ever come up with that?

The crazy thing though is that this is exactly what's going to happen. Doubtless Alan Shatter, Anetta Kahane and Barbara Lerner Specter will strongly approve.

The Irish Savant : Sweden: The end

Sweden: The end

Can a society ever recover from such depravity?

'A paedophile who sexually abused five-year-old girl is given permission to adopt a child in Sweden. A social affairs committee deemed him at low risk of reoffending.'   Oh well, that's ok then.

 

He's been found guilty of 90 crimes including molesting a young girl from his neighbourhood in 2004 and  was suspected of raping a young teenage girl.  Despite not being charged for rape, social services ruled that the man needed to be supervised around his own children. he was considered at high risk of sex offending again, with his ‘probable victims’ were underage girls. Treatment was again recommended as well as parenting classes.

And he's allowed adopt a child.

This is of course part of  the overall programme of societal destruction being visited on us and we're all in the cross-hairs.  Check out this if your stomach can take it.

 

===========