''ESTONIA'' (15) "Hindenburg" (2) “Yom Kippur” War (1) 20th_Century (3) 7/7 London bombings (38) 911 (388) A.H.M. RAMSAY (2) Abu Ghraib (1) ADL (1) ADOLF_HITLER (22) ADVENTURE (1) Affirmative Action (1) Afghanistan (7) AFRICA (44) Agriculture (3) AIDS (23) Alain de Benoist (15) Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (22) AMAZONIA (3) America (4) American Islamization (5) American_Indian (1) ANCIENT_CIVILISATIONS (2) Animal_Rights (6) ANTEDILUVIAN_CIVILISATION (15) Anthony Blunt (1) Anthony Ludovici (3) Antifa (1) AR. LEESE (4) ARCHAEOLOGY (3) Argentina (1) Armenia (3) Art (15) Arthur Koestler (1) Astronomy (30) BALI (1) Balkans (4) banned_weapons (1) BELGIUM (2) Benjamin Freedman (1) BENJAMIN SOLARI PARRAVICINI (11) Beslan (1) Bill Clinton (1) Biological Warfare (2) BLOOD PASSOVER (12) BOLSHEVIK REVOLUTION (14) Book purge (1) Brigitte Gabriel (1) British politics (1) Buddhism (4) California (1) Cambodia (8) CANCER (40) Carolina bays (1) Celebrities-Show Business (3) Cell Phone towers (6) CENTRAL_ASIA (1) Central/South America (1) Ch. Bollyn (30) Charles Tart (8) Che Guevara (2) CHEMTRAILS (13) CHINA (6) Christian Zionism (1) CHRISTIANISM (8) Churchill (6) Circumcision (10) CLIMATE (6) Climate Change (1) cluster bombs/mines (2) COLD_FUSION (1) Colonization of Europe (5) Commerce (1) Communism (48) CONGO (5) Consciousness (7) Conspiracies (8) Consumerism (1) contemporary society (8) COPTS (1) Crime (5) Criminal_Sciense (1) crop circles (5) CUBA (15) DARFUR (3) DECADANT_ART (1) Deir Yassin (8) Depleted uranium (6) DIAMOND CARTELS (1) DIANA (10) DIETRICH ECKART (1) DILUVIUM (5) Disney (2) DOGS (1) Dönmeh (1) Doppelgangers (1) Dresden (6) DRUG ADDICTION (1) E.U. (11) ECHELON (1) ECONOMY (14) EDUCATION (4) Egypt (4) Eisenhower (2) El Inglés (2) Elite_Child_Sex_Rings (16) Elizabeth Taylor (1) ENERGY (8) Enoch Powell (1) environmentalism (3) Ernst Zundel (1) EUROPEAN_IDENTITY (2) Eustace Mullins (10) EVOLUTION (5) EXPLORATIONS (1) Ezra Pound (1) FALSE_HISTORY (1) Fascism (3) Female Genital Mutilation (2) FEMINISM (10) Fjordman (1) Flight 007 (1) Fluoride (1) Food (8) FRANCE (3) Francis P. Yockey (3) Frankfurt School (1) Franklin D. Roosevelt (5) Fukushima (2) Gaza (1) Geert Wilders (1) genetically modified organisms (GMO) (8) German National Socialism (13) GERMANY (16) Gilad Atzmon (11) Globalism (3) Great Britain (32) Great Pyramid (16) Guatemala (1) Gulag (3) Gulf War (1) Gulf War Syndrome (1) Guylaine Lanctot (2) HAARP (10) Harry Potter (1) HEALTH (114) HEMP (1) Henry Makow (2) Hidden History (15) HIDDEN HYPNOSIS TECHNIQUES (1) Hiroshima (3) Historical Review (63) History_of_IDEAS (1) HMS Hampshire (3) Hollow Earth (22) Hollywood (9) Holocaust (137) HOLODOMOR_1932-33 (17) Homosexuality (2) Horst Mahler (4) Howard Hughes (1) Humorous (2) HUNGARY (1) HYPERBOREA (7) IAN STEVENSON (13) Immigration (13) IMPORTANT (5) INDIA (24) IndoEuropean (9) Indonesia (1) Infrasound Weapons (1) Intellectual_freedom (1) Intelligence (14) International Criminal Tribunal (3) INTERNET (2) INTERRACIAL_RELATIONS (1) INVENTIONS (3) IRAN (2) IRAQ (21) IRAQ_war (10) ISLAM (195) ISLAM in RUSSIA (1) ISRAEL (123) ISRAEL-ARAB RELATIONS (2) ISRAEL's_ATOMIC_BOMB (4) ITALY (3) J.Kaminski (4) Japan (2) JEWS (97) JEWS/ISRAEL-USA_relations (46) JFK Assassination (27) JFK/RFK (1) Joe Sobran (4) John Bryant (17) John Lear (3) Julius Evola (38) Kafirs (1) Karl Marx (1) Katyn (11) Kevin MacDonald (28) KHAZARs (1) Knut Hamsun (1) KURDS (1) Lasha Darkmoon (3) Laurel Canyon (4) Layla Anwar (4) LEBANON (3) LEFT (12) Lord Kitchener (4) Lord Northcliff (1) Lost Civilisations (2) Lost Technology (1) LYDDA (1) MADELEINE McCANN (4) Magnesium (7) Mahathir (1) Mahatma Gandhi (4) Malaysia (1) Manipulation (63) MAPS (1) Mark Weber (10) Mass immigration_Multiculturalism (6) Mass_Media (2) Mass-Psychology (3) Massacres (1) METEMPSYCHOSIS (16) MEXICO (1) MH370 (2) MIDDLE EAST (36) Military Tribunal at Nuremberg (8) MIND CONTROL (23) MONEY-Banking (8) Monsanto (9) Mortacracy (6) MUSIC MAFIA (2) MUSLIMS IN EUROPE (38) Mussolini (2) Mysterious (69) Mysterious_SKY (1) Nathuram Godse (3) Native Americans (1) Neapolis (1) NESSIE (17) New World Order (4) NEW_ZEALAND (1) NGOs (1) Nicolai Sennels (1) NOAM CHOMSKY (4) North Africa (3) Norway massacre (5) NUCLEAR (11) Nutrition (20) Obama (2) Occult Symbols (21) Oklahoma City bombing (7) OLYMPIC_GAMES (13) OPINION (9) Orel_Yiftachel (5) P. Buchanan (23) PAEDOPHILIA (15) Paganism (2) PALESTINE 1944-1948 (1) Palestinians (10) PARIS (1) Patrice Lumumba (1) PATRICIA HEARST (2) Patton (2) Paul Craig Roberts (1) Paul Weston (9) PEARL HARBOR (1) PERSONALITIES (1) Photographic_Archive (1) Photography (2) POLAND (5) POLAR REGIONS (30) Poliomyelitis (8) Political Thought (50) Pollution (3) Polynesia (25) PORTUGAL (5) PREHISTORY (28) propaganda (3) Prophecies (12) Psychedelics (64) PSYCHIATRY (9) Psychical Research (88) Psychology (4) R.R.Rife (10) Race (119) Racism (2) RED_Alert (4) Religion (16) René Guénon (1) Revilo Oliver (11) Rockefellers (1) Roger Garaudy (6) Ron Paul (7) Rudolph Hess (1) Ruling_by_CORRUPTION (14) RUSSIA (8) RUSSIAN REVOLUTION (1) RWANDA (31) S. H. Pearson (1) Sabra-Shatila massacre (10) Sandy Hook (1) Sanskrit (1) SAUDI ARABIA (1) Savitri Devi (27) Scandinavia (1) SCIENCE (38) Secret Military Technology (14) Secret weapons (10) Sedition Trial (1) SERBIA (1) sexual freedom (1) Skepticism (1) Slave trade (1) SOUTH AFRICA (2) Space/Apollo_Hoax (54) Spengler (6) Spirituality (1) Srebrenica (1) State_criminality (8) Steganography (16) Steven Yates (7) STRANGE SOUNDS (4) Subterranean_world (10) SUDAN (2) Surveillance (1) SWASTIKA (33) SYRIA (8) Taj Mahal (13) Ted Kaczynski (1) Terrorism (10) TESLA (6) The 1001 Club (1) The Celts (1) The Frankfurt School (1) The Great Flood (8) The Nuremberg Trials (2) The plutonium injections (4) Thought of the Right (63) TITANIC (72) Torture (1) Tradition (5) Transcendent Experience (6) Tunguska (1) TURKEY (4) TWA flight 800 (1) U.S.A. (142) U.S.A. ARMY CRIMINALITY (18) U.S.A. Foreign policy (9) U.S.A. Military (2) U.S.A._HISTORY (2) U.S.A._POLITICS (2) U.S.A._SOCIETY (3) U.S.A.-CIA (12) U.S.A.-Power Structure (4) U.S.S. Liberty (7) UFOs (166) Ukraine (15) UNKNOWN_EARTH (2) USA_Press (1) USA/USSR_relations (2) USS San Francisco (1) USSR (51) Vaccination (1) VATICAN (7) VELIKOVSKY (2) Vernon Coleman (14) Voynich_manuscript (15) WAFA SULTAN (1) War Crimes (30) water (2) Wayne MADSEN (2) WEST (2) White phosphorous (1) WILD_LIFE (1) Wilhelm Reich (4) William Gough (10) wind farms (1) Wm F. Koch (8) World Wildlife Fund (8) WORLD_ORDER (57) WWI (6) WWII (89) WWII Aftermath (34) Younger Dryas Ice Age (4) Yugoslavia (7) ZIONISM (10)

Monday, March 21, 2016


Brigitte Gabriel “They Must be Stopped”

From the book;

“They Must be Stopped”

by Brigitte Gabriel

Brigitte Gabriel is an expert on the Middle East conflict and lectures nationally and internationally on the subject. She's the former news anchor of World News for Middle East Television and the founder of .

CAIR- Council on American-Islamic Relations
By Brigitte Gabriel
© 2006

Universities, for those of us who lecture on campuses, are the battlegrounds for the heart and soul of the next generation of leaders. It is the battleground where we must fight to win back the opinion and allegiance of American college students. This is made harder when Islamists in both the college and local communities try to intimidate us and deny our free speech on campuses in some of the least likely places. We have grown to expect these things on the major East and West Coast "elite" university campuses that harbor radical professors and anarchist student and radical Muslim community activities but not in the heartland where I spoke last week at the University of Memphis. What was shocking was that it occurred in the South, in "Bubbaland" as my friends from the region call it. I was invited to give a lecture sponsored by Professor David Patterson of the Judaic Studies Program. When news about my appearance spread, the Muslim community both on and off campus launched a full-scale campaign to stop my lecture. They demanded that Dr. Patterson cancel my speech. E-mails flooded the University of Memphis administration and Dr. Patterson from Muslim students on campus and Muslims in the community and mosques. Here are some of their comments:

"People like Brigitte are plenty in the world, they are the true enemies of Islam. And despite their rubbish talks, the truth about Islam is spreading like a wildfire across America and across the globe (All Praise to Allah)."

"Dr. Patterson, hosting of this lady is orders of magnitude worse than hosting of the Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan."

"Do you honestly think the scheduled lecture will serve any useful purpose other than inflaming the Muslims, insulting them and spilling poison in the community?"

It is interesting to see the reaction of the Muslim community to someone with Muslim shrapnel in her body who speaks against butchering innocent people in the name of Allah. If they would put the same energy into condemning the radical element within Islam and join us in saying that slaughtering people in the name of Allah is murder – not jihad – maybe we wouldn't question their loyalty as American citizens. Dr. Patterson refused to bow to their intimidation and insisted on going on with the scheduled speech.

By the time I showed up at the amphitheater-style lecture hall on campus, police officers were already standing at each entrance. Nearly half of the hall was filled with Muslims with their leaders dressed Osama bin Laden style sitting in the front two rows at eye level making "their point," that I wasn't going to get away with speaking freely. Just as the program was about to begin, a Muslim student walked to the front and asked the crowd to raise their hands if they believed that this lecture was "undemocratic." They complained that I would be taking questions on cards instead of allowing them to ask them publicly. Experienced in these settings, I knew they would make speeches, spew anti-American and -Israeli sentiments, and create chaos in the room during the Q&A. I decided that they were not going to do that. The provocative Muslim student behavior before I even began my lecture proved my foresight. Dr. Patterson explained that taking questions from cards distributed to the audience was normal protocol at university speaking events like mine.

 Patterson tried to calm the unruly crowd, but nothing was working. Fed up, I went straight to the podium and ordered everyone to sit. I told them, this is my lecture and I run the show. If they didn't like the way I conducted my lecture and my questions they could leave the room, now. Shocked at my behavior and authority they shut-up. The non-Muslim members of the audience applauded.

I finished, asked Professor Patterson to make introductory remarks and returned to my seat. Dr. Patterson introduced me, by telling the audience what an eye-opener this lecture had become because of the reaction. He stated that he never realized that here in Memphis a speaker should be threatened for his/her safety just to speak on a college campus. He introduced me and I delivered my speech with police officers on both sides as well as about eight others in the lecture hall and around the building. Unknown to me, a Muslim student attending the University of Memphis was arrested weeks prior to my lecture for, among other things, possession of DVDs on pilot training and charts on the layout of the Memphis airport. They found links on his computer to sites associated with a radical Sunni Muslim organization in Iraq, and searches for information on how guns and bombs can be smuggled past airport security. After witnessing the Muslim reaction to my lecture and what happened few weeks ago at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, when an Iranian Muslim student drove into – for Allah's sake – innocent students gathering on university grounds, the Memphis police were not going to take any chances.

It is a sad state of affairs when any speaker on any American University campus has to be surrounded by police officers to protect their freedom of speech and person from intimidation and menace. America is the country where free speech is protected under our Constitution. Who would have expected that in the home of the Beale Street Blues, W.C. Handy and Elvis, I would be confronted by Muslims trying to muzzle my free speech, and perhaps all of us? At the end of the lecture, the Muslims immediately in front swarmed over me questioning and intimidating. Police officers quickly moved in and pulled me out straight to the police cars as the enraged Muslims started shouting. Based on what happened to me in Memphis, I think its time for Americans to wake up as to what is occurring within they’re very midst. It is time to be energized and empowered to stand up and fight to take back our universities. Its incidents like this that spur speakers like me to defend our civilization and everything it stands for.

“We know of no absolute values besides total submission of the will of the almighty.  People say: “Don’t lie!”  But the principle is different when we serve the will of Allah.  He taught man to lie so that we can save ourselves at moments of difficulty and confuse our enemies.  Should we remain truthful at the cost of defeat and danger to the Faith?  We say not.  People say: “Don’t Kill!”  But the Almighty himself taught us how to kill.  Without such a skill man would have been wiped out long ago by the beasts.  So shall we not kill when it is necessary for the triumph of the Faith?...  Deceit, trickery, conspiracy, cheating, stealing and killing are nothing but means.  On their own they are neither good or bad, isolated from the intentions that motivated it.”
Ayatollah Khomeini

“Some ye slew and ye made captive some.  And he caused you to inherit their land and their houses and their wealth and land ye have not trodden. . . “ Koran 33:26-27

"I shall terrorize the infidels, so wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and his Apostle" (Koran 8:12)

"The infidels should not think that they can get away from us.  Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.  They are your enemy and Allah’s enemy."  Koran 8:59

"Your lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I am with you.  Give firmness to the Believers.  I will terrorize the unbelievers.  Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them.  Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes."  Koran 8:12

Even though the majority of Muslims are peaceful, law-abiding citizens who do not wish to fight or declare jihad on their neighbors and colleagues, such moderates are irrelevant in the war we are fighting.  Most Germans were moderate as well.  Their moderation did not stop the Nazis from killing 14 million people in concentration camps and costing the world 60 million lives.  Most Russians were peaceful as well.  However, Russian Communists cost the world 20 million lives.  The same goes for most Japanese prior to World War II.  Yet Japan was responsible for the killing of 12 million Chinese.  The moderate majority was irrelevant.

Most moderate Muslims do not know the words of the Koran and are not religious enough to read the Hadith and the Sira, which have even worse commandments regarding declaring war on the infidels and killing them.  Whenever moderates and radicals get into a debate about Islam, radicals always win because they back their statements with “facts” from the holy book while non religious Muslims cannot.

Even though we are fighting a radical minority, that minority is the one we need to focus on and address.  It is like fighting terminal cancer.  Even though you may have one cancerous tumor in your brain, the fact that you have many other healthy cells becomes irrelevant.  Unless you zero in on that one tumor and do whatever is required to eliminate it, the cancer is going to eliminate you and all your health cells.     Brigitte Gabriel, “They must be stopped”

After the attacks in New York, London and Madrid, government leaders raced to the nearest mosque to assure Muslims that they know that the most recent murderous events have nothing to do with their religion, it is someone else’s fault, and that we are sure these terrorists do not understand Islam.  Or leaders fell over themselves to address Muslim groups and to reassure them as to how convinced we are that Islam is a religion of peace.  Even President $%^&*() Bush demonstrates his ignorance: “ I believe people who murder the innocent to achieve political objectives aren’t religious people...”

"When you clash with the unbelieving Infidels in battle, smite their necks until you overpower them, killing and wounding many of them.  At length, when you have thoroughly subdued them, bind the firmly, making (them) captives.  Thereafter either generosity or ransom (them based on what benefits Islam) until the war lays down its burdens.  Thus are you commanded by Allah to continue carrying out Jihad against the unbelieving infidels until they submit to Islam."  Koran 47:4

"so fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief [non-Moslem]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole world)."  Koran 8:39

The Muslim Brotherhood the world’s oldest and most sophisticated Islamic terrorist group.   Its doctrine states: “Allah is our objective.  The Prophet is our leader.  Qur’an is our law.  Jihad is our way.  Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”

In November 2001 a detailed document was found in a villa in Switzerland by Swiss authorities.  The document was a hundred year plan to infiltrate and dominate the west and “establish an Islamic government on earth.”   In western counter terrorism this became known as

“The Project.”

The 26 points:

1. Networking and coordinating actions between like-minded Islamists organizations.

2. Avoiding open alliances with known terrorists organizations and individuals to maintain the appearance of “moderation.”

3. Infiltrating and taking over existing Muslim organizations to realign them toward the Muslim Brotherhood’s collective goals.

4.  Using deception to mask the intended goals of Islamist actions, as long as it doesn’t conflict with Sharia law.

5.  Avoiding social conflicts with Westerners locally, nationally, or globally that might damage the long-term ability to expand the Islamists power base in the West or provoke in back-lash against Muslims.

6.  Establish financial networks to fund the work of conversion of the West, includin the support of full-time administrators and workers conducting surveillance, obtaining data, and establishing collection and data-storage capabilities.

7.  Putting into place a watchdog system for monitoring western media to warn Muslims of international plots fomented against them.

8.  Cultivating an Islamist intellectual community, including the establishment of think tanks and advocacy groups, and publishing academic studies, to legitimize Islamist positions and to chronicle the history of Islamist movement.

9.  Developing a comprehensive hundred year plan to advance Islamist ideology throughout the world.

10.  Balancing international objectives with local flexibility.

11.  Building extensive social networks of schools, hospitals and charitable organizations dedicated to Islamist ideals so that contact between the movement and Muslims in the West is constant.

12.  Involving ideologically committed Muslims in democratically elected institutions on all levels in the West, including government, NGOs, private organizations and labor unions.

13.  Instrumentally using existing Western institutions until they can be converted and put into service of Islam.

14.  Drafting Islamic constitutions, laws and policies for eventual implementation.

15.  Avoiding conflict within the Islamist movements on all levels, including the development of processes for conflict resolution.

16.  Instituting alliances with Western “progressive’ organizations that share similar goal.

17.  Creating autonomous security forces to protect Muslims in the West.

18.  Inflaming violence and keeping Muslims living in the West in a jihad frame of mind.

19.  Supporting jihad movements across the Muslim world through preaching, propaganda, personnel, funding, and technical and operational support.

20.  Making the Palestinian cause a global wedge issue for Muslims.

21. Adopting the goals of the total liberation of Palestine from Israel and the creation of an Islamic state as keystones in the plan for global Islamic domination.

22.  Instigating a constant campaign to incite hatred by Muslims against Jews and rejecting any discussions of conciliation or coexistence with them.

23.  Actively creating jihad terror cells within Palestine.

24.  Linking the terrorists activities in Palestine with the global terror movement.

25.  Collecting sufficient funds to indefinitely perpetuate and support jihad around the world.

“Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in submission.”  Koran 9:29

“Fight them and allah will punish them by your hands, lay them low and cover them with shame.  He will help you over them.”  Koran 9:14

“O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight.  If there are twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels are a people devoid of understanding.”  Koran 8:65

“Fight the unbelievers around you and let them find harshness in you.” Koran 9:123

“Say (Mohammed) to the wandering desert Arabs who lagged behind: ‘You shall be invited to fight against a people given to war with mighty prowess.  You shall fight them until they surrender and submit.  If you obey, allah will grant you a reward, but if you turn back, as you did before, He will punish you with grievous torture.’”

“Fight and Kill disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, beleaguer them and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”  Koran 9:5

‘The Punishment for those who wage war against allah and his prophet and make mischief in the land, is to murder them, crucify them, or cut off a hand and foot on opposite sides. . . their doom is dreadful.  They will not escape the fire, suffering constantly.”  Koran 5:33

The Muslim Brotherhood Project is unusual not because it out lines a strategic plan to establish a world Islamic caliphate but because it includes methods other than violence, to implement cultural jihad.   One of the hallmarks of the Muslim Brotherhood is to use two principles: Taqiyya and Da’wa.

Taqiyya is the Islamic practice of “concealing or disguising one’s belief, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions and/or strategies at a time of eminent dangers, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.  Taqiyya is also used as justification for lies and deceit to advance the cause of Islam.
Da’wa is the act of inviting non-Muslims to accept the truth of Islam.  Da’wa involves both words and actions and is frequently practiced in public schools in America and Western communities.
Both manipulate Westerners to make them believe that Islam is a peaceful religion and its doctrines are written to help all mankind.   In contrast to this Islamic principle, people raised in Judo-Christian cultures are taught from childhood that lying is bad and honesty is good.  So when Westerners here Muslims heads say the Muslim religion is all about peace we tend to believe them.  It is not lying to them, they would probably pass a lie detector test with flying colors, telling the untruth to an infidel is not a lie.  In our ignorance we support the spread of Islamic practices ane culture in the West, and do so in the name of tolerance, understanding and multiculturalism.  Another way to put it is we are getting taken over slowly, with a smile and a lie.

Feb 2008 Archbishop of Canterbury said, “the adoption of certain aspects of Shari law in the United Kingdom seems unavoidable.”  ‘Chip’ One chip in the wall at a time.  We must not offend anybody, we must give in, in the name of multiculturalism, we must be politically correct.  ‘They’ use our own laws and culture against us, that is how you defeat an entire culture.

George Bush calls Islam a religion of peace and has held Iftar dinners at the White house to tell imams how their religion has been hijacked by radicals.  The FBI even invites CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations, when some of its leaders have been convicted on terrorism-related charges to one of the country's largest airports, Chicago's O'Hare, and gives them a behind-the-scene tour to demonstrate how security is conducted.  CAIR is even giving sensitivity training to our FBI and government workers.  Chip

Kansas city International Airport installed Muslim foot-washing benches so Muslim cab drivers can wash their feet before prayers.  I (Brigitte) lived in the Middle East for the first twenty four years of my life and never once did I see a foot-washing station in any public place including airports, universities, public buildings, or hospitals.  Chip

Every crack 'they' can get a foothold every cranny they can exploit, the Muslims are working their way into our lives and eventually their goal is [for us to] become Moslem or die.

“The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a “civilization-Jihadist” process with all that word means.  The Ikhwan (you and me) must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” their miserable house by their hands and the hands of believers 

Another document found in the home of a terrorist suspect in 1991 illiterates the North American plan for the 'Project" by "Ikhwan" ("Brothers"), the Muslim Brotherhood's American Branch.  This 18 page document is a comprehensive plan that charts the ground work for the establishment of an Islamic government in North America and the implementation of Sharia law.
A small part of the document says: – grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging' their miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers --

Every little change they can make no matter how minuscule is a win for their side.  Remember it is a 100 year plan..  Now There are  "women only" gym hours at Harvard University (to comply with the Muslim requests).  An Iman gave opening prayer in des Moines, Iowa legislative session where he prayed, (allah) "give us victory over those who do not believe."  Muslim taxi drivers won't pick up somebody carrying alcohol or someone with a seeing-eye-dog (dogs are dirty).  The first Islamic Public School in New York opened in 2007 funded by tax dollars.  Colleges are making 'prayer' rooms available for Muslim use only.   Chip chip chip chip.

Islam obliges Muslims to possess power so that they can intimidate–I would not say terrorize–the enemies of Islam. . . In the beginning, the caliphate would strengthen itself internally and it wouldn’t initiate jihad. . . But after that we would carry Islam as an intellectual call to all the world. . . and we will make people boarding the caliphate believe in Islam.  If they refuse then we’ll ask them to be ruled by islam.

The era preceding the end [of days] has begun–the era of the military rule, the era of revolutionary rule.  Allah willing we are at the end of this era and, allah willing, the caliphate will return, in accordance with the prophecy, and I pray that we return, in accordance with the prophecy, and I pray that we will be among its soldiers.  Had he wanted, He would have beaten them.  But he tested you I suffering.  We must prepare the ground for the army of allah that is coming according to the [divine] predetermination.  We must prepare a foot hold for them.  Allah willing, this unjust state will be erased–Israel will be erased; the unjust state, the United States, will be erased; this unjust state, Britain, will be erased.

The "Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development" was a fund raising organization for Hamas.  When taken to court the trial ended in a hung jury.  So few people have any idea of what is going on or even what the words mean.  Islam, Koran, Hadith, Sira, Shuri, Taqiyya, Da'wa, kafir, Madrassas.  1935 Germany few people really knew what Nazi meant, the situation now is exactly the same.

Sheikh Muhammad Jamaal spoke to 28000 December 14, 2001 at the al aksa mosque and with no apparent inhibition prayed:
"May the fire of Allah burn down the USA; may he drown America's ships and down her aircraft; may Allah afflict the USA with earthquakes; may Arab oil -- imported by America-- exterminate US leaders!"

According to some Koranic interpreters, any leader who fails to "make wide slaughter" in the land of the infidel is committing a sin.  A statesman is only allowed the temporary expedient of peace if his forces are not yet strong enough to win.

Sheikh Ahmed Yasin founded Hammas in 1987 as the political arm of the Muslim brotherhood initially in Palestine for the fight against Israel but it has spread and is now worldwide.  Hammas political headquarters are located at the United Association for Studies and Research in Springfield, Virginia.  On American soil, Hammas uses American residents, laws, and freedoms to sponsor its activities.  It is implicating America in its war against Israel and using America to destabilize the Middle East, which is only the starting point of radical Islam’s quest to dominate the world.  Radical Islamists are posting their mission and vision on the Internet for all to read.  Unless we eradicate their organizational fronts and cells, they will be here to stay. . . and we won’t!

The Ivy-Covered Fifth Column: Islamic Influence Alive and Well on American Campuses
While Universities like Georgetown and Harvard receive money from the US government, they also receive millions from the Saudis for Middle Eastern studies.   Sandra Stotsky wrote in her book; “The Stealth Curriculum” the materials taught in Islamic Studies come from these centers: “Most of these materials have been prepared and/or funded by Islamic sources here and abroad, and are distributed or sold direct to schools or individual teachers, thereby bypassing public scrutiny.”

There are now between two  and six hundred Islamic schools in the US teaching almost 50 thousand students.  In 2003 the Islamic Academy of Florida received more than $350,000 worth of taxpayer vouchers.  The same year the grand jury in Tampa issued a fifty-count indictment against the academy for being affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood.  Because of that, the $350,000 of the vouchers was revoked.  During the same year another Islamic private day school opened up physically next door.  In 2005 they got $325,000 in taxpayer money and they are using the same desks, books, rooms, teachers and even telephone number.  Chipping away.

The New Horizons school in Pasadena, CA another Islamic private school won a Blue Ribbon award for excellence from the US department of Education.   Excellence for what?  The bureau of Islamic and Arabic Education planned and prepared its lessons.  It has on its WEB site a slant on the pledge of allegiance: “As an American Muslim, I pledge alliance (not a misspelling) to Allah and his Prophet.”  (A Muslim cannot pledge allegiance to anyone but Allah) Chip

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which the US has an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy land trial is the initiator and architect of all the New Horizons Schools in North America.  ISNA which distributes material to mosques and Islamic schools in the US is allegedly affiliated with domestic and foreign terrorists groups and has invited Islamic radical extremists to speak at its events.  Check the site and especially the section that says “How to make America an Islamic Nation” also “Da’wa in Public schools,” where ‘fertile ground for the seeds of Islam.’  Chip

2002 Excelsior Elementary School, a public school in Bryon CA seventh grade world history a three week course where students had to memorize and recite Islamic prayers and verses from the Koran.  Students also opted for Muslim names, fasted for a day to experience Ramadan and wrote about their experience at the end.  Exercises during classes encouraged to use Islamic phrases like Allah Akbar in their speeches.  This is a state approved curriculum.  Imagine if the same thing had been done with a Catholic theme or a Baptists theme.  Big chip

Intentionally feeding misinformation to our school children is one of the Muslim Brotherhood goals using Taqiyya (lying and deception).  Susan Douglas an Islam convert, is a (school) text-book consultant.  She has been accused of showing Islam in a rosy light and glossing over or leaving out entirely the ‘bad’ parts of Islam.  Taqiyya. 

A statement by Mansuri in 2002 stated that “Muslims were here first on American Soil since before this nation was formed.”  It was probably the Mosque that Columbus first noticed on the horizon.  Har har.  Of course, they are probably teaching this to everybody they can.  Lying and deceiving Taqiyya or in this case, taking credit for something they didn’t have anything to do with.  In fact, the Arab World History Notebook, a learning text that was developed by US Islamic groups such as the middle East Policy council and distributed to teachers across America alleges that Muslims were in North America as early as 889 AD.   I’m guessing they had electricity, television and internet all of which they invented.  Even so, this council is regularly consulted by major U.S. publishers of world history and geography.
An example of this mess is a text book by Houghton Mifflin for seventh grade social studies, “across the Centuries.  Is a staple in the state of California (and used in Excelsior Elementary School) is 558 pages long and covers 1500 years between the fall of the roman Empire and the French revolution.  The text includes 55 pages devoted to Islam, seven pages on Europe and 6 pages of Christian history and the Byzantine empire only got 6 pages.  It paints a rosy picture of Islam but strangely enough doesn’t mention the 160 million people they killed. during that time.  Something rather amazing they said women in Islam have “clear rights.”  Taqiyya

Posted on the MIB (Mosque of Islamic Brotherhood) :

Allah is our goal
the Prophet Mohammed ibn ‘abdullah is our leader
The Koran is our constitution
Jihad is our way
And death in the way of Allah is our promised end

Suicide bomber anybody?

a charismatic speaker at the MAS retreat was Mazen Mokhtar, was director of the youth division New Jersey, spoke at another Islamic youth camp in Pennsylvania August 2004.  He created this WEB site for soliciting funds and recruiting for terrorist activities and you were told on the site to contact Shammil Basayev..  A month later Basayev claimed responsibility for the brutal slaughter of school children in Beslen Russia.

Madrassas in Arabic means school.  The majority of the Taliban were educated in Pakistani madrassas.  madrassas ub Saudi Arabia teach a strict and literal interpretation of the Koran and Hadith.  Students must memorize all six thousand verses of the Koran, the rest of their education is put on hold until the more crucial aspects of Sharia law are taught.

First grade text book in Saudi Arabia: Fill in the blank:.  ‘Every religion other than ____ is false.  Whoever dies outside of Islam enters____.”   ANSWERS: Islam, Hellfire

There are 225 Islamic Madrassas registered in the United States funded mostly from Saudi Arabia.

To summarize part of this, think of it this way.  If Germany had published a book in 1939 explaining in great detail how it was going to take over country after country and made it available to anyone who wanted it, do you think they could have gotten away with it?  Apparently if they had published the book and said they were going to take over the United States the president would have invited them to inspect our defenses and have them to dinner.

My thanks to Brigitte Gabriel & her book; "They Must be Stopped"  Get a copy, read it, there is only a poor fraction of it here.


Abu Abdullah, senior member Islamic Party of Liberation:
“We want to free all people from being slaves of men and make them slaves of Allah.”

Bin Laden, from his manual:
“Islamic governments have never and will never be established through peaceful solutions and cooperative councils, they are established as they [always] have been, by pen and gun, by word and bullet, by tongue and teeth.”

Method of attack: The confrontation that Islam calls for with these godless and apostate regimes do not know Socratic debates, Platonic ideals, nor Aristotelian diplomacy.  But it knows the dialogue of bullets, the ideals of assassination, bombing, and destruction, and the diplomacy of the cannon and machine gun.

Baitullah Mehsud, Taliban leader in Afghanistan:
“Allah on four hundred eighty occasions in the Holy Koran extols Muslims to wage jihad.  We only fulfill God’s orders.  Only jihad can bring peace to the world.  We will continue our struggle until foreign troops are thrown out.  Than we will attack them in the U.S. and Britain until they either accept Islam or agree to pay jizyah.”

“So fight them until all opposition ends and the only religion is Islam.”  Koran 8; 39

Ahmed Yassin, a spiritual leader of Hamas:
 “The era preceding the end [of days] has begun–the era of the military rule, the era of revolutionary rule.  Allah willing we are at the end of this era and, Allah willing, the caliphate will return, in accordance with the prophecy, and I pray that we will be among its soldiers.  Had he wanted, He would have beaten them, but he tested you in suffering.  We must prepare the ground for the army of Allah that is coming according to the [divine] predetermination.  We must prepare a foothold for them.  Allah willing, this unjust state will be eased--Israel will be erased; this unjust state, Britain, will be erased.”
The Israelis kindly arranged for Ahmed to meet with Allah.

Sheikh Abdel Rahman, first World Trade Center attack planner:
“Oh, you Muslims everywhere, sever the ties of their nation, tear them apart, ruin their economy, instigate against their corporations, destroy their embassies, attack their interests, sink their ships and shoot down these airplanes.  Kill them in land, at sea, and on the air; kill them wherever you find them.”

In America we believe that: “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  In Islam the opposite is true.  The Koran includes a comprehensive code of law, and regulates everything that involves daily life for Muslims, Mohamad Elachmi Hamdi, editor in chief of Al-Mustakillah, Observed:
“The heart of the matter is that no Islamic state can be legitimate in the eyes of its subjects without obeying the main teachings fo the sharia.  A secular government might coerce obedience, but Muslims will not abandon their belief that state affairs should be supervised by the just teachings of the holy law.”

Ester Pan, staff writer for the council on foreign relations, writes in her analysis: “Europe: Integrating Islam”:
the continent has been deluged with hundreds of documents , news stories, films and editorials about Islam in the last few years, part of a lively debate about the religion’s influence, some British banks now advertise their compliance with rules governing Islamic banking, The German province of Saxony-Anhalt became the first in Europe to issue a sukuk, or Islamic bond, which complies with Quranic rules barring the payment or collection of interest.  In Denmark, one of the most secular countries in Europe , the Quran is required reading for high school students; the bible is not.  But experts say the new efforts do not necessarily change countries’ generally assimilationist policies, or the attitudes of many of their people.

“Believers, take not jews and Christians for your friends.  They are but friends and protectors to each other.”  Koran 5;15

In an effort not to offend Muslims the Bank of Halifax and NatWest were first to ban piggy banks from their premises.  Chip

13% of Muslims living in Britain said they “admired” organizations like Al Qaeda.

Ahmed Salam resident in the city of Tilburg Holland refused to shake hands with than minister of immigration and integration Rita Verdonk on camera.  He preached that men should treat their wives with physical violence.  In a recent public meeting they ‘demanded that no alcohol (i.e. wine) be drunk by anyone at the table, since their beliefs does not allow it.’  He told his followers ‘not to pay taxes so as to do harm to the Dutch State.’

A congressional report on homeland security by the subcommittee on investigations of the House Homeland Security Committee acknowledged the threat of terrorist organizations sneaking into the United states through the Mexican border.  “We apprehended five Pakistanis on the US-Mexico border with fraudulent Venezuelan documents,” said Representative Michael McCaul.

Same report (titled, “Line in the Sand, Confronting the threat at the Southwest Border) the case is made as to the number of aliens other than Mexican.  Known as OTM.  Crossing the border at alarming rate.  Those OTMs are nationals of Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq.  Drug cartels are charging terrorists 25 to $50,000 per person to smuggle people into the US though Mexico.

Canada’s terrorist problem has grown increasingly urgent.  In 2006 agents of Canadian law enforcement arrested seventeen Muslim men in Toronto who, inspired by Al Qaeda, tried to acquire three tons of ammonium nitrate and bomb-making components.  The group was “planning to commit a series of terrorists attacks against solely Canadian targets in souther Ontario,” Royal Canadian Mounted Police assistant Commissioner Mike McDonnell said.

A number of companies in the US are now offering Muslim compliant food e.g. McDonalds.  Steak House has announced plans to offer halal lamb to their menu.   The ACLU is threatening to take action to any restaurant that does not offer Muslim (Shari) complaint food.  Some prisons are to begin offering halal food items.  Starbucks is to offer a drink especially aimed at Muslims. Muslims are demanding and getting Muslim guides in places like Disney Land..  Disney managers are receiving training on how to juggle schedules to allow for Muslim prayer times.

–Old Arabian proverb says: “If the camel gets his nose in the tent, his body will follow.”

Omar Ahmad, a Palestinian American, told a Muslim audience in Fremont, CA in 1998:
 “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant.  The Koran should be the highest authority in America and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”

The Australian writer Warner MacKenzie has the American mind set nailed.
In his article “It’s the Ideology, Stupid!” he states:
The West’s propensity for ignorance is nothing short of astounding when one considers that, in this first decade of the 21st century, a veritable gold mine of information, on any topic, is available on one’s fingertips via the Internet.  Never before have books on the subject of Islamic history and terrorism been so prolific, yet the same old dangerously erroneous opinions on the causes of Islamic violence remain as popular, uninformed and widespread as ever.”

Sayeed Abdul A’la Maududi founder of Jamaat-e-Islam:
“Islam is a revolutionary faith that comes to destroy any government made by man.  Islam doesn’t look for a nation to be in a better condition than another nation.  Islam doesn’t care about the land or who the land.  The goal of Islam is to rule the entire world and submit all of man kind to the faith of Islam.  Any nation of power that gets in the way of that goal, Islam will fight and destroy.  In order to fulfill that goal, Islam can use every power available every way it can to be used to bring world wide revolution.  This is jihad.”

Tabari: A collection of Koran verses and Hadith quotes, illustrates how Allah allows the abusive treatment of women, likening them to animals and sex objects.
"Allah permit you to shut them in separate rooms and to beat them, but not severely, if they abstain, they have the right to food and clothing.  treat women well for they are like domestic animals an they possess nothing themselves.  Allah has made the enjoyment of their bodies lawful in his."  Tabari IX:113

Women in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt:
“Believers, approach not prayers with a mind befogged or intoxicated until you understand what you utter.   Nor when you are polluted, until after you have bathed.  If you are ill or on a journey or come from answering the call of nature or you have touched a woman and you find no water, then take for yourselves clean dirt and rub your faces and hands.  Lo!  Allah is Benign, forgiving.”  Koran; 4:43

“If you fear high-handedness from your wives, remind them [of the teachings of god], than ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them.  If they obey you, you have no right to act against them.  God is most high and great.”  Koran 4:34

Wife-beating in Islamic nations is more prevalent than one can imagine.  In Pakistan, it has been reported by the Institute of Medical Science that 90% of its female population has been beaten for such wrongdoings as giving birth to a daughter or cooking an unsatisfactory meal.  After the African country of Chad attempted to outlaw wife-beating, Islamic clerics in that nation deemed the bill “un-Islamic.”

Mohammed was forty-nine years of age when he became betrothed to Aisha, the daughter of one of his closest friends.  At the time, she was six years of age.  Three years later, Mohammad consummate the union.

In 2001 Iran lowered the legal age to marry from 12 to 9.

In Bandung, Indonesia, a free female circumcision event is held every spring by the Assalaam foundation, an Islamic educational and social services organization.  A 2003 survey by the Population Council shows that 96% of respondents acknowledge that their daughters had been mutilated by the age of fourteen.

Rape in Iran is punishable by death. . . for the victim, that is.
A recent victim in Afghanistan got 3 years in prison, disowned by her family and the father promises to kill her when she gets out of prison and it is legal for him to do that.

2007 Saudi Arabia a nineteen year old woman was ordered to receive 90 lashes when she was raped repeatedly by a gang when she talked with a male friend not in the family.  When she appealed to the court and the media the punishment was raised to 200 lashes for, “aggravate and influence the judiciary through the media.”  The lawyer lost his license and was subjected to ‘other’ disciplinary measures.

“Men have authority over women, for that god has preferred in bounty one of them over another, and for that they have expended of their property.  Righteous women are therefore obedient. . . and those you fear may be rebellious, admonish them to their couches and beat them.”

The symbol of the veil is so important that in 2002 in Mecca, religious officials allowed fifteen schoolgirls perish in a fire rather than let them seek refuge outside without their head coverings.

Prostitution and the sex slave trade is one of the most profitable business in Iran.  Interesting when ‘they’ recruit new members into their fold one of the things ‘they’ point to is the immorality of Western Civilization.  Young male children between the age of 3 and 15 are sold into slavery as camel jockeys.  When not racing they are often beaten, raped and must sleep with the animals they serve.

10. A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.

The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:

Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem, The Qur’an, Oxford UP, 2004)

9. Husbands are a degree above their wives.

The Quran in Sura 2:228 says:

. . . Wives have the same rights as the husbands have on them in accordance with the generally known principles. Of course, men are a degree above them in status . . . (Sayyid Abul A’La Maududi, The Meaning of the Qur’an, vol. 1, p. 165)

8. A male gets a double share of the inheritance over that of a female.

The Quran in Sura 4:11 says:

The share of the male shall be twice that of a female . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 311)

7. A woman’s testimony counts half of a man’s testimony.

The Quran in Sura 2:282 says:

And let two men from among you bear witness to all such documents [contracts of loans without interest]. But if two men be not available, there should be one man and two women to bear witness so that if one of the women forgets (anything), the other may remind her. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 205).

6. A wife may remarry her ex-husband if and only if she marries another man and then this second man divorces her.

The Quran in Sura 2:230 says:

And if the husband divorces his wife (for the third time), she shall not remain his lawful wife after this (absolute) divorce, unless she marries another husband and the second husband divorces her. [In that case] there is no harm if they [the first couple] remarry . . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 165)

5. Slave-girls are sexual property for their male owners.

The Quran in Sura 4:24 says:

And forbidden to you are wedded wives of other people except those who have fallen in your hands [as prisoners of war] . . . (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 319).

4. A man may be polygamous with up to four wives.

The Quran in Sura 4:3 says:

And if you be apprehensive that you will not be able to do justice to the orphans, you may marry two or three or four women whom you choose. But if you apprehend that you might not be able to do justice to them, then marry only one wife, or marry those who have fallen in your possession. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 305)

3. A husband may simply get rid of one of his undesirable wives.

The Quran in Sura 4:129 says:

It is not within your power to be perfectly equitable in your treatment with all your wives, even if you wish to be so; therefore, [in order to satisfy the dictates of Divine Law] do not lean towards one wife so as to leave the other in a state of suspense. (Maududi, vol. 1, p. 381)

2. Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded).

The Quran in Sura 4:34 says:

4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (Haleem, emphasis added)

1. Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.

The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says:

65:1 O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617, emphasis added)

Mohammad owned dozens slaves.  The practice is alive and well in most in many Allah-fearing nations today.  The Atlantic slave trade ended in mid nineteenth century yet Muslims were enslaving black Africans thirteen centuries before the slave ships brought Africans to the New World.  Interestingly enough although this did start so long ago almost no decedents of them are alive today.  They were either worked to death or if they couldn’t earn their keep, disposed of.   Islamic racism is so entrenched in Muslim society that the Arabic word for black is abed (slave) or abeeds (slaves).  There is no other respectable word in the Arabic language that describes a black person as equal or even human.   Blacks are also referred to as ‘filth.’  In contrast Mohammad described the “Muslim people” as “the nobles of all races.” and immune from slavery.  Slavery was abolished in Saudi Arabia in 1962 but it still flourishes.  Saleh Al-Fawzan on the senior council of clerics says, “slavery is a part of Islam and whoever wants it abolished is an infidel.”

Devout Muslims have made no secret of their intentions to Islamize the United States.  Abdurahaman Alamoudi, former head of the American Muslim Council has observed, whether it takes “ten years or a hundred years,” the United States will become a Muslim country.

Saudi prince Waleed bin Talal – Americas’s foreign policy was responsible for the attacks on 9-11.

Prior to 9-11 Arab American professors at the university of South Florida were able to function effectively as agents for Palestinian Islamic Jihad, and one of them, Ramadan Abdallah Shallah assumed the leadership of that group.  Another (Muslim) student at the U of SF who entered the US in 1974 and remained for 15 years Musa Abu Marzook rose to the top levels of Hamas.

The Muslim congressmen form Minnesota, Keith Ellison swore his oath on a copy of the Koran.
The Koran contains hundreds of entries saying it is the duty of Muslims to convert or kill all others.

Highly sensitive positions in the pentagon and FBI are being filled by Muslims.  For some reason the CIA is not hiring non-muslim arabic interpreters.  What’s with that?

We Christians (Brigittie) and Jews who came to the US from the Middle East look on with utter amazement and disgust at the gullibility and stupidity of those who allow Muslims to work in such sensitive areas of government.

In reference to a march 2002 attack against American churchgoers in Pakistan journalist Stephan McDonald wrote: “as,  ‘moderate’ Muslims  rolled 6 grenades down the aisle of a church packed with worshipers in the diplomatic enclave of Karachi, the message is clear..
We must measure our freedoms against the degradation of totalitarian regimes and terrorists organizations, as well as against the principles of Islamic Sharia, from which our enemies derive the spiritual and ideological motivation to destroy us.

We have much to lose.  The freedoms we enjoy rest on principles common only to Western Democracies: the rule of law, equality under the law, individual rights as opposed to group rights, private property, an independent judiciary that recognizes the sanctity of human life and has regard for the rights of others and the separation of church and state.  We must also remember the freedom of thought, of conscience, of expression, of association and of religion.  These freedoms allow us to change our religion, ridicule religion or reject it entirely – rights denied to all Muslims living under Islamic regimes.

“Our enemies have used our best character qualities against us–tolerance, inclusion, forgiveness and pluralism,” Cal Thomas observed in May 2002.
Suppose our enemies have invaded the United states through immigration for the express purpose if organizing themselves politically?  Suppose they present themselves as benign and seek to register voters, becoming politically active in order to elect their people to office and change US policy in the Middle East?

What if their intentions are the eventual destruction of this nation through its democratic processes and the imposition of a theocratic state?
In at least sixteen states, Muslim groups, by their own admission, are organizing voter-registration drives and political consciousness-raising events for this express purpose.

The claims by apologists for Islam that it is a religion of peace are easily refuted by even the most cursory examination of its doctrines and its history.  Thus, propagandists for Islam have no choice but to make every effort to shut down debate and silence criticism.  In doing so they are preparing Western society for the ultimate conquest of Islam through jihad by cultural or violent means, this makes them every bit as dangerous and perhaps even more so, than suicide bombers.

Hate Mongers
Those in Western mosques and madrassas who advocate and/or distribute materials that advocate violence and the overthrow of constitutional law and democracy are causing the increased radicalization of moderate Muslims in //America and other countries of the West.  The impact is especially strong on younger Muslims.  The right to freedom of speech is being abused by these Islamist ideologues.  It is unlawful to yell “fire” in a crowded theater, because the freedom of speech does not protect outcries that pose an imminent threat or danger.  How can it than be lawful to preach violence and the overthrow of lawfully elected governments under the guise of “free speech?”

Our enemy has two powerful allies: apathy and disbelief.

Small wonder Islamic organizations and their politically correct allies are doing all they can to silence leaders who speak out, by intimidating leaders they hope to preempt organized grassroots activism that could resist what is happening.  Ignorance, unorganized effort and apathy are their allies.  They know they cannot advance their agenda in the face of an informed, organized and mobilized force.

Interestingly enough, I’ve said something pretty similar to this just recently.
A lie unanswered and repeated often enough, comes to be believed.  (This understanding of “the big lie”“ was the heart and soul of Goebbels’ Nazi propaganda machine.)  We cannot sit idly by and watch our children be spoon-fed historical revisionism, distortions, and outright falsehoods about Islam.

80 million Hindus have been slaughtered by Islamic forces since the year 1000, around the time Afghanistan was dominated by Islamic rule.  Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have been killed
because they won't conform to one 'standard' or another.  In Algeria alone, where decapitating teacher or slitting throats in front of students is not uncommon, radical Islamic violence has claimed the lives of upwards of 150,000 Muslims over the last ten years.  wearing western attire justifies summary execution. Women are slaughtered or mutilated for exposing their hair.  Egypt suffers from the same affliction:  more than 60,000 people there have been brutally murdered
and maimed by radical Muslims.

“The Prophet, Allah’s prayer and peace be upon him, says: “The hour of judgment shall not come until the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them, so that the Jews hide behind trees and stones, and each tree and stone will say: ‘Oh Muslim, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him,’ except for the Gharqad tree, for it is the tree of the Jews.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 41, Number 6985)                           

Muslim Call to Prayer has been allowed by a city council vote in the Michigan town of Hamtramck despite protests of many of the 23,000 residents.

"There does not exist an identifiable body of Muslims, substantive in number or an outright majority, who could be described as "moderate" by their repudiation of Muslim extremists. Violence has been an integral part of Muslim history, irrespective of whether it is
sanctioned by Islam, and Muslims who unhesitatingly use violence to advance their political ambitions have created a climate within their faith culture that any Muslim who questions such practice is then deemed apostate and subject to harm. Consequently, what might pass for
"moderate" Muslims, the large number of Muslims unaccounted for as to what they think, in practical terms constitute a forest within which extremists are incubated, nurtured, given ideological and material support, and to which they return for sanctuary." - Salim Mansur

"Like children playing with dynamite, Western intellectuals, journalists, and diplomats fantasize that they are achieving results in the Middle East with their words, promises, apologies, money, and concessions. Yet how can such innocents cope… with polities and societies whose basic ruling ethos is that of the serial killer?… Can anyone really expect a stable society capable of progress in Pakistan when a large majority of the population expresses admiration for Usama bin Ladin? And what about the Saudi system where, as one local writer put it, the big Usama put into practice what the little Usama learned in a Saudi school?… The radical forces in the region are not expecting to retain or gain power by negotiating, compromising, or being better understood. They believe they are going to shoot their way into power or, just as good, accept the surrender of those they have intimidated.  That is why so much of the Western analysis and strategies for dealing with the region are a bad joke." - Barry Rubin, source:

100% of the most dangerous terrorists are Muslims:

Tears of Jihad:

American Muslim leader Khalid Abdul Muhammad speaks about whites (2

Hate preaching in Western mosques (2 min. video):

Muslims in America (3 min. video):

What Islam is not (8 min. video):

Young Talib beheads Ghulam Nabi:

The Third Jihad (32 min. video):

Enough of Radical Islam:

Hindu Man: Why I hate Islam:

Arabs are racists because they are Muslims:

While Europe Slept (free book):

Mohammed, a pedopheliac medieval psychopathic fascist barbaric butcher.


When Mohammad was asked what the greatest deed that a Muslim could do besides believing in Allah and His Apostle, he answered, .I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say: none has the right to be worshiped but Allah..   A 2007 Pentagon-based study proved conclusively that Islamic religious law (sharia) extols violence as a primary means of spreading the ideology. It also notes that Islam‘s‘ goal to subjugate the entire world to Islam and sharia law is based on unalterable, long-standing religious and legal doctrines.

According to the online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, in its List of Wars in the Muslim World, since the death of Mohammed there have been 63 major Islamic wars of conquest involving over 201 major battles. It also documents 18 current conflicts involving Muslims, which represent over 95% of the World‘s armed conflicts. Historians have estimated that Muslims killed over 270 million people during the last 1400 years in their wars of conquest, plunder and enslavement.

The Saudi Arabians are the world‘s most aggressive exporters of radical Islamic ideologies. Since 1973 they have spent over $80 billion to promote their fundamental interpretation of Islam around the world.44 Osama bin Laden is a Saudi. Fifteen of the nineteen 9/11 terrorists were Saudis; many of them were on the payroll of Islamic charities..

The word “Assassin” comes from a group of Sheite Muslims that perfected the art of killing.  They smoked Hashish before going out to make themselves feel invincible so Hashians became Assassins.

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Austrian intelligence says US organizations are funding immigration into Europe

An anonymous employee from the Austrian Defense Office, which is operated by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Defense, says that some groups in the USA are paying smugglers to get more African and Middle Eastern immigrants into Europe.
Traffickers demand exorbitant sums to bring refugees to Europe illegally. The conditions are often very poor, but still a transport does currently cost 7000-14000 Euro…” the Austrian Defense Office employee told

There are insights that organizations from the US have created a co-financing model and contribute substantial amounts to trafficker’s costs.”
Not every refugee from North Africa has 11,000 euros in cash. Nobody asks where the money comes from.
The employee said that there was a “strict news blackout” on how the African and Middle Eastern immigrants were able to pay the traffickers fees.
If this is true, then it means various anti-White groups have resorted to paying for non-White illegal immigrants, instead of legal ones, all so they can make White Europeans a vanishing minority.
While these anti-Whites claim to be building “diverse” societies, it seems highly suspicious that ONLY White countries are targeted to become “diverse”.
The point that we are putting out is that a targeting of a group (in this case White people) is genocide. Only White countries, cities, and towns are not “diverse” enough, and the “final solution” is to make all of them minority White.
Deliberately trying to turn us into a minority is as much White genocide as shooting us or putting us into camps.

Thursday, August 6, 2015

Book purge!

Book purge I have mentioned many times

Hi Jim I am an engineer from the US now living in New Zealand. In America, I first started noticing something going on with the libraries in the late '90s. Previously, I was able to use Northwestern's federal depository and law libraries anytime they were open and also found great documentary and scientific information even at my local suburban public library. Then suddenly, the university installed turnstiles and restricted most hours only to students while the local libraries were purging some incredible books (a few of which I got practically free before they were tossed).
This past weekend I was at the engineering library of the University of Canterbury (Christchurch, NZ) and noticed that a lot of the books I had seen previously were no longer there. I found out that they were merging the previously separate science and education libraries into the engineering library, but with no additional shelving. To make room, they've been purging huge numbers of valuable technical books and almost all of the old engineering journals. Someone mentioned that the aeronautics section was only one-quarter of what it used to be. Nothing was being stored and no record was being kept (or at least made available) of what had been removed.
This plus the prohibitive cost of good technical books, the uselessness of the Internet as a serious research tool and Draconian penalties for "copyright infringement" leads me to but one conclusion. All knowledge will be in the hands of a small number of NWO corporations and it will be impossible for would-be independent inventors to challenge them.
My response: There is nothing corporate about it. What you are witnessing is the total destruction of Western Civilization, which is based in those books. Destroy the libraries and hard print, and you destroy the civilization. This has been part of a Jewish plan for world domination since the 1970's in America. Most American libraries, even in small towns, were still great in 1990 because at that time they had not made a lot of headway. Now the libraries have been purged of all, and I MEAN ALL technical info of any substance. I remember going to a library looking for the light spectrums of various light sources in 1990 and it was SUPER EASY to get that information. You won't find that type of stuff now, and that is what libraries are for. If you cannot do that, you have no library. And yes, it was for an invention, just as you state.

Here is a previous article I typed years ago on this topic:

The Jews have set a goal of destroying the value of every printed library in Western Civilization

If you ever visited libraries in the past, back in the 80's, you would know that at even a modest public library you could find every book you needed to understand all aspects of the sciences. You would have been able to find accurate history, All the information gained from the nuclear tests, the truth about EMP's and nuclear tsunamis, all the great works of all the great writers, all the musical compositions and scores for all of the great musicians, detailed maps of every square inch of the earth, all of the local laws and codes, all of the electronic theory, all of the formulas for organic chemistry, all of the engineering information for the different types of steel, all the Chiltons manuals for automotive repair, every last topic about astronomy and astrophysics, folks, it does not take a lot of books to cover all those topics and far more, I can't think of them all, everything even a modest public library which, for example, a small city of 10,000 people would have had even 20 years ago. Or should I say 30? because starting in the mid 80's our libraries went under attack, to annihilate their value as a reference base for Western Civilization. Their destruction was deliberate. I am an inquisitive type who would actually USE the libraries in the past. And it was never any problem to get detailed information, I can't even begin to tell you what types of things I would look for, for example, when developing a new type of bug killer lamp (it worked great) I was able to find the exact light spectrums of the various mercury vapor lamps. I could set out to find a fact, and everything I ever set out to look for would ALWAYS be at ANY library. I know I am unique in the type of things I would look for and therefore can serve as the library canary, giving the signal of DOOM. I knew the libraries were turning to garbage, but could not figure out why. That is, until my experience with the Jewish community. And now, even in cities with populations of a million plus, I can't find jack. I can't get a single question answered. Only the most basics of basic are there, the libraries have been stripped of real value and replaced with fluff.
Fluff like 94,000 feminist books, books about gaydom, alternative religion, new age B.S, 93 trillion ridiculous "self help" books, aisle after aisle of fiction and fantasy and virtually NOTHING of value with regard to what was once the fabric of Western Civilization. Any book with any science at all has the science buried under volumes of convoluted text, obviously intended to confuse. What once could be found within a few minutes now takes hours or days, if it can be found at all, or at least before frustration drives me out the door. Now, information which was once free to the public has been quarantined, for access only to the discrete few willing to pay thousands for that information via college text books or pay window documents on the web, and I have seen enough of those to know that even THEY are now intentionally convoluted and watered down.

It was intentional

The Jews made it a huge point - the value of having your own HARD PRINTED LIBRARY. And even poor Jews have enormous hard bound libraries in their homes. Jews will spend enormous piles of money on hard printed works, because they know that hard print cannot be changed via an online "update" and the only solid record of fact is a printed book. And while building their own private libraries, they set out to destroy the public libraries accessible to any non Jews. They got into all the library staffs, and made the decisions of which books got thrown, and which books got kept. If you go to any public library, you will discover that somewhere in each library there will be a Jew making the decisions of what will be in that library. Go to the dumpster out back, I have done this as part of my investigations of the Jews following leaving them, and even in little old bakersfield, I witnessed an enormous number of great books going out through the dumpster, with absolutely nothing of value replacing them inside the library. When I was in Vancouver, after leaving the Jewish community, I visited the library there and found a lot of the old good books still in place, only to discover that key pages were consistently ripped out of many of the best ones. And it was not vandals or geeks, because vandals don't care about technical writings and geeks know what a copier is, and also have a lot of respect for written works. I of course had the advantage of knowing Jews were doing this to our libraries, and checked the dumpsters and pulled key works to see what new atrocity had been committed on a fairly regular basis.

The internet has changed

Once upon a time you could go to Alta Vista, type in any scientific fact you wanted to know, and BOOM, it would be on your screen. It was like a library on steroids. But after Google that changed. Google buries all truthfully technical information behind a pay wall, and even Alta Vista now does as well. So unless you plan to spend hundreds or thousands buying technical writings in the hopes that one nugget will be there (chances are it will not) the internet has now been rendered totally useless as a scientific reference tool. So they FIRST destroyed the libraries, and then destroyed the web, and if you think Wikipedia is great you have a lot of learning to do.

Via the destruction of our information base, the Jews have made an enormous step towards gaining our rightful future

It's no secret our schools have been destroyed. It's no secret that our kids are now graduating with honors, while not being able to think or even knowing the basics. We are about to be made irrelevant as a civilization. There is still a key pool of 50 plus year old engineers who got real educations, who are designing CPU's and whatever else was at the pinnacle of our society. As far as technical advancement, there are enough of these people from America's great past still in the system to hide the damage that has been done. They won't be there forever, and when they are gone we will suffer a collapse more enormous than the world has ever witnessed. And rising from the ashes of that collapse will be the Jews, with all of our works carefully preserved within their homes and private libraries, and with their children carefully educated with OUR advanced knowledge they will rise to the top. Our civilization, with it's great technical reference base destroyed and children intentionally sabotaged via tainted vaccinations and worthless "educations", will slip into irrelevance. July 25 2015

Tuesday, March 3, 2015



    by Orysia Tracz

    You know how a wound sometimes still hurts even though you thought it had healed long ago? The scar may be barely visible, but it tingles, burns, and smarts at the oddest moments. I have a scar like that on my soul, and ten years later it still aches.
    None of my relatives died in the Great Famine in Ukraine during 1932/33. The millions who starved in that genocide by famine lived in central and eastern Ukraine, under Soviet rule; my parents and their families were in western Ukraine, under Polish rule. Yet when the 50th anniversary of that nightmare was marked in 1983, I mourned as if the dead were my own.
    It would have been painful enough just remembering such an event, and honouring the millions of innocent dead who starved while there was plenty of food around -- unavailable just to them. What made the 50th commemoration of the Great Famine such an ugly experience was the deafening silence and disbelief of the majority of the Canadian media and the reaction of a certain segment of society. The various editors, columnists, and producers did not believe -- or did not want to believe -- that the famine actually happened, that it was deliberately orchestrated to forcibly starve the Ukrainian population so adamant in remaining Ukrainian and non- Communist, and so resistant to Stalin's collectivization. Not only did they not believe, they stonewalled and tried to ignore the event itself and its anniversary. For the media, Ukrainian issues were not "politically correct" in 1983. Simultaneously, the pro-Soviet segment in Canada did all it could not only to deny that the famine happened and was man-made, but to vilify and defame the Ukrainian survivors and their community for even daring to bring it up. Often, this was the group the media believed. The campaign, bolstered by the Soviet embassy, was so malicious that a decade later remembering those events still hits a raw nerve.
    While other tragedies of human history and of our own inhumanity to each other in this century were covered often by the print and electronic media, the Famine did not count. Because of Soviet disinformation, with a few exceptions it had been ignored for those fifty years. The fear of that Soviet system was so pervasive and so paralyzing, that some survivors of the Famine -- even those with no family at all left in Ukraine -- still refused to have their experiences recorded fifty years later in Canada. On this gruesome anniversary, the Ukrainian community in most Canadian cities fought an uphill battle in getting the newspapers and television stations, especially the CBC, to inform the public about this almost unknown genocide. "Too academic," "too historical," not newsworthy enough," "we can't mark every anniversary that comes along" and "that issue has been well-covered in the past" were the replies of a Winnipeg Free Press city editor to inquiries why events related to the anniversary were not reported. Only one letter to the editor was printed at the time, even though many had been sent in. It took a whole month of inquiries at first, then downright badgering by angry individuals before the Winnipeg Free Press printed three articles about the Famine [April 9, 1983]. Ironically, after all that, one of the articles carried the headline "Famine in Stalin's Russia [sic]." A separate box carried the statement:

    Few events of such enormity have attracted so little public clamor or more press apathy that the government-programmed famine which led to the extermination in 1932-33 of 8 million people in Ukraine. The Free Press was a party to this apathy -- in the years immediately after the famine and in efforts this year to publicize its 50th anniversary. Editors took for granted it was a matter best left to history books and academics, ignoring much significant new research on the subject. Readers have noted the shortcomings. These pages acknowledge it.

    Communists, Marxist-Leninists, and Soviet sympathizers whipped themselves into a frenzy of denial of the Famine and vicious attacks on Ukrainians who spoke about it. Their line: it never happened, no one ever died, well, maybe a few thousand, no, a few million did die, but that was because of the drought, no, because of the social conditions, it was the fault of the kulaks, well, they had to die to save the new ideal system, they were enemies of the state anyway, well maybe some did die, they deserved it, it was a hoax perpetrated by fascists. It was especially painful to read and listen to protests from Ukrainian Communists. When members of the community presented a brief to the Winnipeg School Division #1 School Board to have information about the Famine included in the division's curriculum along with that about other genocides, one school board member protested. Mary Kardash (Labour Election Committee), questioned the authenticity of the presentation, and moved that this be discussed at a later meeting to get the "true facts" [sic] and "other points of view" about the Famine. The Ukrainian Communist presentation to the school board argued that "history should be taught in an objective manner" and, therefore, the Famine should not be taught as a deliberate act of the Soviet Union [try teaching the Holocaust without mentioning the Third Reich, or effect without cause]. But those presenting the five briefs opposing "the unsubstantiated charge of genocide" could not keep their stories straight: the arguments went from no famine at all (just a hoax), to the admission that between 3,500,000 to 5 million perished. William Ross, former head of the Communist Party in Winnipeg, wrote that they "...did not deny that a famine occurred... What they rejected was the unsubstantiated charge that it was a `definite act of genocide deliberately created to annihilate the Ukrainian people.' " Similar battles took place in other cities. In Edmonton there was a prolonged battle over a monument to the victims of the famine.
    Objectivity, credibility, and fairness were a primary concern to those on the receiving end of Famine information. And the idea that the Famine happened and its story must be told was not a welcome one. The Manitoba Department of Education finally included the Famine in a world issues course, part of a grade 12 social studies curriculum. But the course "would not favour either side of the issue. The curriculum would be designed to teach that a famine did occur in Ukraine in 1932-33 and that millions of people perished. The reason the famine occurred will be open to discussion." [emphasis o.t.] Would the reasons for the Holocaust be "open to discussion"?! An editorial in the Winnipeg Free Press [December 19, 1993] cautioned that the curriculum program should strive for objectivity and scholarship and not be designed to serve the interests of any political group.

    "Campaigners and agitators who seek modern redress for past wrongs or who seek to unite straying members of an ethnic group by the remembrance of past horrors are entitled to do that, but that is not the business of history and should not be asked of the history teacher... [The course should be used to illustrate] what sources of historical information consist of and how they can be evaluated for usefulness and trustworthiness."

    Would such an attitude be expressed if the course were one on the Holocaust? Now such comments seem bitterly tragicomic, but at the time they meant that these emotional Ukrainians are just trying to get back at the Russians, this whole famine story is a lot of bull, needs to be taken with a mountain of salt, and we're better off believing the Soviets anyway. Neither the educational nor the journalistic sector remembered its professional ethics, and did not bother to verify for itself the mounds of scholarly, documentary material -- much of it from non- Ukrainian sources, since these were perceived to be more credible -- presented by the community. Survivors' testimony was considered tainted, based on emotion, unreliable. What is survivors' testimony supposed to be, if not primary material? Not when it came from Ukrainians.
    At McGill University's McLennon Library, the photo and book exhibit "The 1933 Man-Made Famine in Ukraine -- The Forgotten Holocaust" was in danger of being closed down because the library administration considered the exhibit "too political" [would a Holocaust exhibit be so labeled?]. The exhibit was held in conjunction with a Famine symposium held at the University of Quebec at Montreal (March 25-26, 1983). Because "it was impossible to repudiate the academically-oriented content of the exhibit" and most of the books were from the library's own collection, it continued for the contracted run (March 13-27).
    Letters to the editor in Winnipeg papers were equally cruel, and at times pathetically comical in their logic. J. Goray reacted to a positive review of Robert Conquest's Harvest of Sorrow by Tom Oleson in the Winnipeg Free Press:

    ... It is obvious that Mr. Oleson's lack of factual information...led him to rely on the discredited Robert Conquest.... [Walter Duranty and others] maintained the famine was grossly exaggerated, while others such as William Randolph Hearst, Malcolm Muggeridge, Robert Conquest, Victor Krawchenko and other falsificators of history adopted a hostile, anti-Soviet policy of slander and vilification. In any case, millions of people from all over the world visited the Soviet Union including the Ukraine during the time of the `famine' and it would have been impossible to conceal such an apocalyptic event as the death by starvation of seven million people had there been such a catastrophe.

    However, Alexander Basilevsky, another apologist, did acknowledge that the Famine occurred, because of "a sad combination of amateurishly bad planning on the part of the Soviet government, sabotage by many wealthy peasants and a serious drought (which also affected the Canadian and American prairies)." [This writer's inquiries into the precipitation figures for the 1930s in Ukraine showed that 1932-33 had the highest rainfall for the decade.]
    The producers of CBC Television news in Winnipeg had a strange way of showing the "true facts." Because they could not bring themselves to accept that this genocide had occurred, it was deemed necessary to present "both sides." We saw the spectacle of supposedly-qualified academics discussing whether survivors really lived through what they had lived through. I could only imagine a panel discussion on CBC between Holocaust survivors and revisionists on whether the Holocaust actually happened, and both side being treated with equal respect by the moderators and the producers. The producers never even thought that some of the differences between the two genocides were that Hitler and his system were defeated, there was no cover-up or denial of what happened [that could be taken seriously], and the Nazis no longer existed to instill terror into the survivors, while Stalin's empire and terror continued, the frigid fear gripping survivors and their relatives across the ocean. Holocaust survivors were able to meet, reminisce and testify about their experience. Famine survivors looked over their shoulders, whispered if they dared, some went mad, and all still were not believed.
    To my horror, an appalling comparison surfaced: this famine "hoax" was perpetrated to diminish the number of those exterminated in the Holocaust of World War II. Did anyone really believe that any people wanted to compete over how many more millions died in one genocide over another? A Canadian poet of Ukrainian background wrote:

    When in the breadbasket
    of Europe
    Ukrainian peasants
    starved to death
    the world was silent
    as it was
    when your people
    in the horrors of Dachau
    as Nazi soldiers
    drank "to life"
    in brassy cabarets

    When the King of Aryans
    unfurled his Master Plan
    we both
    were targeted for extinction
    and so our parents fled
    the haunting sirens
    the hideous war
    leaving their loved ones
    your died in Treblinka
    mine lived a hell
    in the Siberian snows
    Yet now
    our communities
    wage a paper war
    the battle lines are drawn
    armed with statistics
    and testimonies
    we count
    the dead
    was it the famine
    the holocaust
    that had more dead:
    whose trauma was greater?

    Why all this now
    when Sabbath candles glow
    and bread is plenty?

    © Chrystyna Hnatiw 1988
    [Chrystya Hnatiw in Land of Silent Sundays (Toronto: Williams-Wallace, 1988). Reprinted by permission of the author]

    But the Ukrainian community was not competing for statistics. It was struggling just to get the genocide accepted as a fact of history. God knows, we had our own millions who perished at the hands of both Hitler and Stalin during World War II. Were it not for glastnost and the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainian survivors and their community would still be hitting a brick wall trying to have the Famine acknowledged. In 1990 the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine issued a statement admitting that the Famine was man-made by Stalin's Soviet government. But Lazar Kaganovich, the orchestrator of the Famine, continued to live the life of a privileged Party pensioner in Moscow -- with no regrets -- until his death in 1991. The Ukrainian Canadian Communist community was really at a loss when its own publication, the Ukrainian Canadian, published the Party's statement on the Famine [April 1990]. Some members could not handle the admission -- and especially a poignant painting about the famine on the cover of that issue -- and called for the dismissal of the editors. "Reading about all the attrocities ... during the Stalin era is painful enough; do we have to stare at that horrible image on the front cover?..." "Offensive"... "We need to apologize to no one..." "Concentrate on Canadian issues..."
    On the 60th commemoration of this genocide by famine, there is only deafening silence from those experts, academics, and authors who were so hysterical and defamatory in their attacks and denials. After this, how suspect is their other academic work? There are enough scholarly works available to the public documenting the Famine; readers can judge for themselves Robert Conquest's, James Mace's and Malcolm Muggeridge's credentials and compare them to Walter Duranty's. As skulls continue to emerge from the Ukrainian soil, both from the Famine and the mass executions of the later 1930s, there is no more need for the "other point of view," "both sides," "objectivity," "pursuing the truth," "evaluating for ... trustworthiness," and "non-political investigations." As volumes upon volumes of testimony are being collected in Ukraine from survivors who only now can speak openly after six decades of fear, as official documents of the time appear, as the burial mounds and crosses are only now being raised over the mass graves of whole villages, I wonder what the consciences of our other Canadian revisionists are telling them. They knew, dammit, they knew all along. For this I cannot forgive and I will not forget. I cannot dwell on this, though, for life goes on. Yet when similar issues of Ukrainian history and experience surface in the media and Ukrainian credibility is questioned, I can only hope that that the media do their job honestly, and that truth will triumph, as it did in this case. But it would have been better if the hungry years of 1932/33 had not happened at all.

    In 1929-1932 the Soviet Communist Party under Stalin's leadership... struck a double blow at the peasantry of the USSR as a whole: dekulakization and collectivization. Dekulakization meant the killing, or deportation to the Arctic with their families, of millions of peasants... Collectivization meant the effective abolition of private property in land, and the concentration of the remaining peasantry in "collective farms" under Party control. These two measures resulted in millions of deaths...
    Then in 1932-3 came what may be described as a terror famine inflicted on the collectivized peasants of the Ukraine and the largely Ukrainian Kuban (together with the Don and Volga areas) by the methods of setting for them grain quotas far above the possible, removing every handful of food, and preventing help from outside -- even from other areas of the USSR -- from reaching the starving. This action, even more destructive of life than those of 1929- 32, was accompanied by a wide- ranging attack on all Ukrainian cultural and intellectual centres and leaders, and on the Ukrainian churches. The supposed contumaciousness of the Ukrainian peasants in not surrendering grain they did not have was explicitly blamed on nationalism... The Ukrainian peasant thus suffered in double guise -- as a peasant and as a Ukrainian...
    The total [conservative] peasant dead as a result of the dekulakization and famine [were] about 14.5 million... seven million plus from dekulakization and about seven million plus in the famine...
    [There was] ... the ability of Stalin and the Soviet authorities to conceal or confuse the facts. Moveover, they were abetted by many Westerners who for one reason or another wished to be deceived. And even when the facts, or some of them, percolated in a general way into the Western mind, there were Soviet formulae which tended to justify or at least excuse them...
    Conquest, Robert. The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivization and the Terror-Famine. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press in association with the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, 1986.
    (reprinted by permission)




    Concluding his review of Douglas Tottle's book Fraud, Famine and Fascism, Wilfred Szczesny writes: "Members of the general public who want to know about the famine, its extent and causes, and about the motives and techniques of those who would make this tragedy into something other than what it was will find Tottle's work invaluable." (The Ukrainian Canadian, April, 1988, p.24) In the era of glasnost, Szczesny could have rendered his readers no greater disservice.
    For an editor-in-chief of a Ukrainian magazine to invite people to consult Tottle's tract is as appropriate as for a publisher of a Jewish periodical to recommendThe Hoax of the Twentieth Century by the Holocaust denier A.R. Butz. lf in Szczesny's statement quoted above the reader substitutes "Holocaust" for "famine" and "Butz" for "Tottle", the affront to the reader's dignity in both cases will become apparent. Tottle is no more interested in discovering the truth about the forced starvation of Ukrainians than Butz about the gassing of Jews.
    Tottle is a self-confessed famine-genocide denier. No longer able to negate the famine as such, Tottle questions its genocidal character. Traditional famine-denial has been updated to famine-genocide denial, but the essence of the ideological trappings is the same. Today's famine-genocide deniers are the spiritual heirs of the first famine negators, Stalin and those who helped him carry out the most heinous of crimes against the Ukrainian nation or to deny its existence.
    With his book Douglas Tottle has become a sort of guru to a strange collection of latterday famine-genocide deniers. He has inspired militant articles by Jeff Coplon ("In Search of a Soviet Holocaust", Village Voice, 12 January, 1988); Wilfred Szczesny ("Fraud, Famine and Fascism", The Ukrainian Canadian, April, 1988); and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx ("The Ukrainian Famine: Fact or Fiction", McGill Daily, 22 November, 1988). How vile and trite is the campaign of the famine-genocide deniers should become clear from the following three examples of how Tottle practices the misdeeds of which he accuses others.
    First, let us consider the photographs of the famine. Tottle latches on to them as if they were the main proof of the historicity of the tragedy and the principle argument for its classification as genocide. Tottle does this because he thinks that the photographs form a weak link in the famine-genocide story: break this link and the whole structure will collapse. Well, this is not so. The famine has a solid documentary basis (documents published in the West and in the Soviet Union) of which the photographs form a very minor (and I might add, dispensable) component. There are few photographs from the 1932-33 famine and we could hardly expect otherwise, since the totalitarian regime wanted to keep the famine hidden and took the necessary measures to ensure this.
    Many more photographs have come down to us from the earlier Soviet famine of 1921-23. Some of these pictures were eventually used in connection with the second famine and this fact provided Tottle with his basic argument against the famine-genocide: photographs depicting a natural famine of 1921-22 in Russia are used as proof of man-made starvation in Ukraine in 1932-33. To make his accusation stick, Tottle resorts to a mixture of irrelevant truths, half-truths and outright lies.
    Tottle constantly refers to the Russian famine of 1921-22, but never mentions the contemporaneous famine in Ukraine. Yet most of Tottle's "illustrative" material is taken from Ukraine and not Russia. On page 32, Tottle reproduces three title pages of what he describes as "publications devoted to the Russian famine of 1921-22", even though two of them deal only with Ukraine. One is Holod na Ukraini, an excellent documentary by Ivan Herasymovych based on personal observations and containing excerpts from the Soviet Ukrainian press and a number of photographs. Tottle identifies the second text (the reduced reproduction is almost illegible to the naked eye) as "Dr. Fridjof Nansen's International Committee for Russian Relief, Information No.22, Geneva, April 30, 1922", but fails to give the title of the report contained on that page. It reads: "Famine Situation in Ukrania". With the help of a magnifying glass the reader can decipher the following revealing information about the famine conditions in Ukraine, sent by Nansen's representative from Kharkiv on 22 March, 1922:

    "(N)ot before the 11th of January of this year could the goubernia of Donetz stop their obligatory relief work for the Volga district and begin to take care with all their forces of their own famine problem, at a time when already more than every tenth person in the Donetz was without bread. In the beginning of March this year, you could still see, in the famine-stricken goubernia Nicolaev (Mykolaiv), placards with 'Working masses of Nikolaev (sic), to the help of the starving Volga district!' The goubernia of Nicolaev itself had at the same time 700,000 starving people, about half the population. On my way to Ukrania I sought information in Moscow about the situation from presumably well informed persons. They told me that in Ukrania the situation was very bad, about half a million people starving. In reality the number was more than six times greater."

    Further on, the envoy continues:

    "The whole of the 4 goubernias of Odessa, Nicolaev, Yekaterinioslav (Katerynoslav), and Donetz, as well as the southern parts of Krementchoug, Poltava and Kharkov, are stricken by famine. Of a total population of about 16 million in these goubernias, between four and five millions are now starving, and before the new harvest the number will perhaps have risen to between six and seven millions. Almost the whole population of Ukrania is suffering to a certain extent from lack of food and all the conveniences of life, but the above mentioned millions are literally starving to death." (p.2)

    In a follow-up report, dated 13 April, 1922, and reproduced in the same document, we read:

    "Five million persons are now without food and probably more than ten thousand die daily of starvation... In a word, the famine has reached such dimensions and such insignificant relief is given, that the starving population loses every hope and dies." (p.30)

    What Nansen's man was describing was the first man-made famine in Ukraine which lasted from 1921 to 1923 (and not 1922) and took 1.5 to 2 million lives. In spite of the drought in its southern provinces, Ukraine had enough grain to feed its population, provided the foodstuffs were kept in the country and not exported. But during these two years Soviet authorities removed enough agricultural produce from Ukraine to feed several times the population which died from hunger. Ukrainian grain was sent to Russia both years to feed the cities and the famished population on the Volga. (A severe famine was also ravaging southern Russia, especially the Volga region.) The second year it was also sold in Western Europe. Aid offered by foreign countries was accepted immediately for the Volga region but let into Ukraine only eight months later.
    Since both famines in Ukraine were manmade, it was quite legitimate to use in the film Harvest of Despair photographs from the famine of the 1920's along with those of the 1930's. The weakness of the film lies not in these photographs but in the insufficient explanation the film gave of the first famine. This shortcoming has no bearing on the authenticity of the famine-genocide of the 1930's. To suggest the opposite, as Tottle, Coplon, Xxxxxxxx and Szczesny do, is to display ignorance or lack of intellectual integrity.
    Second, let us see how even the great Ukrainian historian Mykhailo Hrushevsky is made to serve the famine-genocide deniers' propaganda machine. Szczesny writes:

    "Tottle cites a number of historians and other writers whose works contradict the claim that the famine was a deliberate act of genocide, including Isaac Mazepa amd M. Hrushevsky, both of whom discuss the causes of the famine with no suggestion that it was a deliberate effort to destroy the Ukrainian people."

    Taken at face value, Szczesny's contention sounds serious. If Ukraine's foremost historian could analyze the famine and find no deliberate action against the Ukrainian people, then surely his findings carry more weight than the claims of lesser scholars. And yet to anyone the least familiar with contemporary Ukrainian history it sounds incredible that Hrushevsky should have written such things about the famine. What are the facts?
    In 1941, Yale University Press published a translation of Michael Hrushevsky's History of Ukraine. As the Ukrainian text stopped in 1905, the editor, Professor O.J. Frederiksen of Miami University (Ohio), decided to update it. Two chapters were added. One, entitled "Ukrainian Independence", covered the period 1914-1918 and was based on Hrushevsky's other writings. The second chapter, "Recent Ukraine", brought the events up to 1940; it was written by the editor from notes provided by Dr. Luke Myshuha and had nothing to do with Hrushevsky.
    In the Frederiksen/Myshuha chapter references to the 1932-33 famine are very skimpy, but there are two passages (p.566) that have some bearing on the subject. Skrypnyk, the Commissar of Education in Soviet Ukraine, is reported as having "committed suicide in 1933 in protest against Soviet policies there, and in particular against the export of foodstuffs". It is also claimed that after a year of drought and chaotic agricultural conditions, "during the winter of 1932-33 a great famine, like that of 1921-22, swept across Soviet Ukraine, again costing the lives of several million men, women and children." (My emphasis - R.S.) In the next paragraph the reader learns that "Hrushevsky was arrested in 1930 and transferred from Kiev to a town near Moscow; he died on November 26, 1934, at Kislovodsk, in the northern Caucasus."
    Now let us see how Tottle reconstructs these references:

    "However, A History of Ukraine by Mikhail (sic) Hrushevsky - described by the Nationalists themselves as 'Ukraine's leading historian' - states: 'Again a year of drought coincided with chaotic agricultural conditions; and during the winter of 1932-33 a great famine, like that of 1921-1922, swept across Soviet Ukraine...' Indeed, nowhere does History of Ukraine claim a deliberate, man-made famine against Ukrainians and more space is actually devoted to the famine of 1921-22." (p.91)

    Tottle then adds laconically that Hrushevsky's history was published posthumously in 1941 and that it was updated to 1940 based on notes by Dr. Luke Myshuha. Tottle does not deem it necessary to mention the work of Professor Frederiksen, or to specify when and where Hrushevsky died, although these facts are essential to appreciate the reference to the famine. He does, however, go out of his way to point out that Myshuha was "editor-in-chief of Svoboda", and that he had "visited Berlin in 1939, speaking over Nazi radio in Ukrainian," (p. 92) information quite irrelevant to the analysis of the famine, but necessary to make the perfidious famine-Nazi link which I shall discuss further on.
    Here again we have a mixture of irrelevant truths, misleading half-truths, and lies. The comments by Myshuha/Frederiksen on the famine are deformed (damaging reference to Skrypnyk's suicide to protest the export of grain while several million starved is left out), and even though Tottle does not actually attribute them to Hrushevsky, he words his statement in such a way as to create that impression. Whether Szczesny was privy to Tottle's ruse or was duped by the insinuation, the result is the same; a lie about Hrushevsky's alleged denial of the famine-genocide.
    Third, a few words are in order on the subliminal Nazification of the Ukrainian famine-genocide. If there is one common denominator to all the famine-genocide denial literature, it is the effort to tie the Ukrainian famine to the Nazis and sandwich between them that part of the Ukrainian diaspora which defends the right of the Ukrainian nation to exist as a sovereign state. Genocide deniers would be happiest if they could blame the famine on the Nazis and the "Ukrainian collaborators" as Stalin pinned Katyn on the Germans. But since this can not be done, they try the next best thing: link with Nazis those who speak out about the famine (including famine survivors and descendants of famine victims).
    On the cover of Tottle's book one can see a photograph of a woman with an undernourished child, and looming over the photograph a hand with a paintbrush. The brush is about to be dipped into oilpaint profusely pouring out of a tube marked with a swastika. What a disgusting spectacle, and yet how descriptive of the author and the book! Isn't Tottle getting ready to apply Nazi colours to the famine victims?
    When one checks the book's table of contents one notices that only one chapter is classified as "famine", the other nine deal with "fraud" and "Fascism". In fact, at least ten times as much space is devoted to the task of making the famine-Fascism connection as is given to the study of the famine. Unabashed, the author admits that he "does not attempt to study the famine in any detailed way". (p.1) He is more interested in the "Nazi and fascist connections" and the "coverups of wartime collaboration" (p.3). Both topics, even if they had been objectively treated, are completely irrelevant to the study of the famine and can neither prove nor disprove the existence of the famine or define the nature of the tragedy. (Many of Tottle's attacks on the various segments of the Ukrainian diaspora constitute hate literature and should be dealt with in our courts of law.)
    The attempt to hush up serious examination and legitimate condemnation of the famine-genocide, or to dismiss it as Nazi-related propaganda, makes the writings of Tottle and the other famine-genocide deniers particularly repugnant. They have the impudence to desecrate the memory of millions of innocent people deliberately starved to death by criminals who have never even been punished for their diabolical act. Perhaps it was people like the famine-genocide deniers that Oleksandr Dovzhenko had in mind when he made this entry in his diary written on the German front on May 4, 1942:

    "If all the heroism of the sons of Ukraine in the Fatherland war, all the sacrifices and suffering of (its) people, and all (their) victorious energy after the war, cunning hands and pens of certain clever fellows throw into a common...pot, and on account of Ukrainians, these same hands thrust artificially created Hitlerite Petliurivshchyna and anti-Semitism with all the consequences of slaughter-houses, it would be better for me to die and no longer witness human baseness, bottomless hate, and fathomless eternal lies which entangle us. (Dnipro, 1988, No.10, p.89)

    In his review of Tottle's book Szczesny writes: "The theory of the big lie is that the bigger the lie and the more often it is repeated, the more it will be believed." (p.22) Szczesny should have added that in order to render their own lie more credible, the hoaxsters accuse their opponents of the deception they themselves practice, while presenting their own fabrication as a corrective to their opponents' alleged lie. Need we be reminded that the real hoax is not the Holocaust but what Butz has to say about it and the great fraud is not the famine-genocide but Tottle's treatment of it?
    Documents on the famine published recently in the West (M. Carynnyk, et al, The Foreign Office and the Famine, Kingston, Ont., 1988, and others), and in the Soviet press (isn't it about time that the 'UC' reprinted some of them?) leave no room for doubt that the famine in Ukraine was man-made. As Yuri Shcherbak, the author of a novel on Chornobyl states, "the famine of 1932-33 was in no way a natural disaster. There was no drought, no hurricane as its origin... The Ukrainian harvest of 1932 while not a record one was totally adequate. Yet there was an unusual famine. From the beginning to the end it was organized from the top.... Peasants, packed on train rooftops, tried to flee the famished regions. But on the border between Russia and Ukraine... units of border guards were stationed..." (Sobesednik, Moscow, 1988, No.49)
    Is it legitimate to call this famine genocide?
    Ten years ago few people outside the Ukrainian diaspora would have ventured such an opinion: in the West because of what was thought to be a lack of reliable evidence (diplomatic archives were closed and testimony from "refugees" was viewed with suspicion), and in the Soviet Union because the very subject was taboo. All this has radically changed in the last few years.
    Taking advantage of glasnost, Ukrainians began to speak openly about the crime of the "33rd", calling it "man-made famine", "artificial famine", "extermination by starvation (holodomor). Although they use the more familiar traditional expressions, in their minds these terms are synonymous with genocide". What else is the deliberate starvation of millions of people, if not genocide? Occasionally, one even comes across the words "holocaust" and "genocide" as when Wasyl Pakharenko answered those who do not recognize the specificity of the Ukrainian famine. "The uniqueness of our (Ukrainian) tragedy lies in this that in Ukraine, the social-class genocide coincided with the cultural-national (genocide)." (Molod' Cherkashchyny, Cherkassy, 1988, No.30)
    The notion that the famine was genocide is also gaining acceptance in the West. Michael R. Marrus, professor of history at the University of Toronto, and the author of The Holocaust in History, in his forward to The Foreign Office and the Famine (cited above), comes to the conclusion that the evidence presented by the British documents suggests that there was a genocidal attack upon Ukrainians. Leo Kuper, professor emeritus at the UCLA and author of Genocide, a pioneer work on the subject, writes in his latest work The Prevention of Genocide about the "many millions who died in the Soviet manmade (sic) famine of 1932-33". Kuper accepts the argument that "this artificially induced famine was in fact an act of genocide, undermine the social basis of a Ukrainian national renaissance." (p.50)
    In the light of all the evidence we now possess on the famine, how bleak and ignoble appear the statements of genocide deniers of the Stalin era (unscrupulous journalists like Walter Duranty of the New York Times, credulous and dishonest intellectuals like the British writer Bernard Shaw, the French politician Edouard Herriot). It took fifty years to debunk their big lie; how long will it take the defenders of truth to dispose of the big lie promoted by Tottle and his supporters? The challenge is before the Ukrainian community. Will The Ukrainian Canadian, for one, have the courage to take it up and make the last stand of the famine-genocide deniers a short one?
    Roman Serbyn is a professor of history at the University of Quebec at Montreal.