DARKMOON UPON AMERICA, BY ISRAEL SHAMIR: A Debate between Israel Shamir and Lasha Darkmoon
“The world that awaits us, if our New Masters prevail, will
be a grim dystopia. It will be a spiritual wasteland in which an
unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the teeming masses. It will be a
cruel world of exploitation, moral darkness, and unspeakable
brutality.” — Lasha Darkmoon, America Vanquished
Darkmoon upon America
by Israel Shamir
Response, Pictures and Captions by Lasha Darkmoon
The gifted British poet Lasha Darkmoon recently published a new essay in two parts called America Vanquished, claiming that the US, Germany and Russia were colonised by Jews.
How close to truth is she? Being a Gothic poet, she embellished her essay a lot, but here is the important part. She says:
In
short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a Jewish colony.
As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with their own
petard.
But why worry? American Jews are Americans,
are they not? If they’re smart enough to take over America, as they
have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next logical
step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world through
America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full-spectrum dominance.
So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world,
doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic
is irrefutable.
Jewish
world domination takes on a different perspective when viewed through
this historical prism. No “conspiracy theories” here. No hook-nosed Jews
grasping the globe in their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to
sodomize your children and drink their blood. Just logic. Just history.
Just America striving for full-spectrum dominance — with Jews leading
the pack.
You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.
Lasha Darkmoon claims, that if the Jews form an elite in the US, then US world dominance is a form of Jewish world dominance.
Her second claim is that the US has became a colony of Israel. She even claims that “America is now Israel’s slave”.
There is a huge logical leap here: even
if US Jews form an important part of the US elites, why would they give
away their leadership to their cousins and brethren in the Middle East?
DARKMOON: (stepping in)
Good point, Mr Shamir. Now consider my logic and try to refute this: If
the Israeli Jews give the orders to the American Jews, and if the
American Jews control America, then clearly America has become an
Israeli colony. But if, on the contrary, American Jews exercise all the
power and tell the Israeli Jews what to do, then clearly Israel is an
American colony. The logic is inescapable.
Let’s go to the next step.
Once it is admitted that America is
controlled by its Jews, whether Israeli Jews or American Jews, America
becomes in effect a JEWISH colony.
Given that American Jews were former
immigrants to America who have managed to “take over” America, you could
say that Jewry has colonized America. Ergo: no matter which way you
slice it, America is either an Israeli colony or a Jewish colony. The
logic of my argument, I put it to you, is irrefutable.
We can take this therefore as proven:
if America is not an Israeli colony, taking its orders from Israeli
Jews, then it is a Jewish colony, taking its orders from American Jews.
SHAMIR: World
Jewry is a project rather than reality; in real life, Jews of different
countries do not feel themselves a single united body though they do
interact. Compare them with Catholics: these have the Pope and a single
hierarchy, and still they are united in prayer only. Jews have no Pope,
no hierarchy, and are even less united.
DARKMOON: Jews less united
than the goyim? Wow! I never thought any group could be less united
than the goyim, or more united than the Jews in knowing “what is good
for the Jews”. If you are trying to convince us that the Jews are
DISUNITED just because no two Jews think alike, some preferring Buddhism
to Judaism and others preferring kippas to hats, then you are on very
shaky ground indeed! We are well aware that no two individuals, whether
Jewish or non-Jewish, think alike; just as we are aware that no two
individuals have identical fingerprints. It doesn’t follow from this,
however, that people with different opinions are going to be disunited,
any more than it follows that people with different fingerprints are
going to be disunited.
To say that Jews lack unity is almost
like saying America lacks military power. Or the Queen of England is
short of cash. The Jews have far more unity, I put it to you, than any
other other ethnic group in the world. This fundamental cohesion of the
Jews is something I have pointed out in my recent essay America Vanquished:
“The extraordinary success of the Jews,
who make up only 2.5 percent of America’s population, can be attributed
to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This
advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of
the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled
them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly
threaten them as a group.” (See here)
Despite the superficial differences
between various types of Jews, the Jews are surely a paradigm of unity
and cohesion compared to other ethnic groups.
You yourself, Mr Shamir, have written:
“Palestine is not the Ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is.” Consider
that statement. Can you seriously tell me that the Jews are likely to
achieve this grandiose goal of world domination by being disunited and
disorganized? by lacking coordination? No, of course not!
One could supply countless arguments to
demonstrate the remarkable unity of the Jews in achieving “what is good
for the Jews”. Pray tell: how did the Jews manage to take over the mass
media, Hollywood, academia, the judiciary, the executive branches of
government, Wall Street, the world’s banking system, the lavishly funded
Think Tanks, even the porn industry, if they were disorganized and
disunited?
The major Jewish organizations that
crisscross America like a spider’s web—AIPAC being only one of them—can
hardly be accused of ineffective disunity.
You’ve heard of mesira, the
code of honor among Jews that make them stick together through thick and
thin, never betraying an organ-stealing rabbi or even a serial killer
to the goy authorities. Isn’t sticking together the ultimate form of
unity?
You’ve heard of the Sayanim, Mossad’s
one million worldwide helpers. How these faceless individuals, all Jews
living in lands outside Israel, work away for Israel in providing “safe
houses”, transportation, access to communications networks and other
facilities for Mossad spies. Full details of the existence of the Mossad
Sayanim network were given in the 1994 book The Other Side of Deceptionby Victor Ostrovsky, himself a renegade Mossad agent.
The Jewish Sayanim remind me of bees,
all buzzing away for the common good, all united by a common purpose:
to cram the hive full of honey.
One final point, Mr Shamir, which I
know will make you graciously concede victory to me on this vitally
important issue: in saying that “the Jews have no Pope, no hierarchy,
and are even less united” than the goyim, you are guilty of a glaring
contradiction. Wasn’t it only a few years ago that you argued the very
opposite? Far from implying that the Jews were a disunited group, you
stated that they possessed an almost supernatural unity, comparing them
to locusts that moved in ordered formation to achieve their common goal.
“It is hard to swallow that the Jews have a strategy,” you said, “but no strategist. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
are popular precisely because they posit such a supreme strategist.”
And then, to drive home the point, you added the famous quotation from
the Bible: ‘The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation’ and
devastate whole countries as if by plan.” (Cabbala of Power, p.13)
That last phrase—“and devastate whole
countries as if by plan”—is your own. You are daringly comparing the
Jews to locusts who have an uncanny and almost supernatural ability to
act in unison.
CAN JEWS BE COMPARED TO LOCUSTS, ACTING IN COORDINATION?
“The locusts have no king, yet they attack in formation” (Proverbs 30:27)
and devastate whole countries as if by plan.
SHAMIR:
Israel is a very important element of Jewish life, Lasha, but this does
not mean an Israeli Prime Minister can order Jews around.
Granted, politically active Americans
think that one can’t succeed without Jewish support. This much we can
learn from the incredible reception of Netanyahu in the Capitol and from
Obama’s capitulation. And US politicians think that the US Jews love
Israel; that is why they express their love of Israel. However, the
American Jews’ feelings towards Israel are not that straightforward.
Remember a prominent American Jewish politician Henry Kissinger? He
facilitated the greatest Arab attack on Israel in 1973 in order to take
Israel down a notch.
So, US Jews are certainly an important
part of the US elites. Consequently they influence world politics, while
the Israeli Jews are just family and friends of these powerful American
Jews. This is the secret of Israeli influence: without the support of
American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.
“Without the support of American Jews, Israel would shrink to its normal size.” — Israel Shamir
The US Jews’ position in the US is so
strong because US society has been formed and influenced by the Jewish
spirit of predatory capitalism, as expounded by such diverse thinkers as
Karl Marx, Werner Sombart and Milton Friedman. Defeat of financial
predatory capitalism could undo the Jewish hold. It would de-Jewify the Jews and society in general.
And here we come to your second claim,
Lasha: namely, that Russia and Germany are colonised by Jews. Even
granting your poetic licence, this is far from the truth. Germany is not
colonised by Jews; it is still occupied by the US troops.
DARKMOON:
I’m not disagreeing with you, Mr Shamir, about Germany being under US
occupation. In fact, I quote Eustace Mullins in Part 1 of my essay
saying exactly the same thing. But I certainly never said that Germany
had been “colonized by Jews”. Where did I say that? I would never have
made such a ridiculous statement. I said that about America, but not
about Germany.
SHAMIR:
Jews play a negligible part in modern German life, Lasha. Even after
the the defeat of the Third Reich, there was no resurgence of the Jewish
spirit. Germany has a strong social security structure. Predatory
financial capitalism has made few inroads. Germany is not a neoliberal
state. The Germans pay tribute to Israel, that’s true; but this is only a
result of American occupation. The West Germans are indeed
indoctrinated in guilt feelings towards Jews, but East Germans have no
guilt feelings whatsoever, and they influence the totality of German
feelings. If and when US troops leave Germany, Germany will reassert
itself.
Again, Russia is not colonized by Jews.
Some Jewish oligarchs were expelled, and others were imprisoned by
Putin. Russia usually votes against Israel in the UN and supplied
enemies of Israel with its advanced weaponry. Russia now has fewer Jews
than Scotland: about two hundred thousand altogether by official census,
and twice that much by overblown Jewish organisations’ estimate.
Granted, Russia has no anti-Semitism, and it has some influential Jews,
but the important decisions are not made by them.
Was Russia “colonized by Jews” after
the October 1917 revolution? This is the weakest part of your essay,
Lasha. I’m afraid you know little about this subject and just repeat the
silly claims of others.
DARKMOON:
Again, Mr Shamir, I must point out with all due respect that at no
time did I ever claim that Russia was “colonized by Jews”, nor did I
even imply it. The same with Germany. However, if that is the impression
I gave you, then I must apologize for not making my meaning clearer.
SHAMIR:
You tell us that important Bolsheviks used pseudonyms; true, but this
is not always connected with their Jewishness. Lenin’s real name was
Ulyanov, but this is not a Jewish name. The early Bolsheviks were
guerrilla fighters, and they used all sorts of names to evade
surveillance. This is also a part of underground ethos.
DARKMOON: Again, I am in full agreement with you, Mr Shamir. So there’s no point ticking me off for disagreeing with you!
What I said in my article was that
almost every single revolutionary Jew in Bolshevik Russia hid behind a
non-Jewish name. This was either because they were engaged in subversive
activities or because they were anxious to avoid being the victims of
the virulent anti-semitism of those times.
Pseudonyms were adopted by non-Jews
just as frequently if they were involved in seditious activities.
Stalin, whose real name was Joseph Djugashvili, had at least 40
pseudonyms. See Simon Sebag Montefiore’s Young Stalin,
p.395, for a list of his false names. Lenin, who was half Jewish, not
only had over a hundred bogus names, but also went in for glued-on wigs
and giant spectacles!
SHAMIR:
Abu Jihad, Abu Ammar and Abu Mazen are nicknames, but surely they are
not Jews. You and your readers, Lasha, should read Lindemann’s book Esau’s Tears. This deals extensively with the question of the Bolshevik leaders Jewishness.
These crazy numbers you quote— “66
million Russian Christians killed by Jews”— “out of 388 members of the
new revolutionary government in Russia, only sixteen were real
Russians”—were invented by anticommunists.
DARKMOON:
Good point, Mr Shamir. I concede that the 66 million figure is probably
a gross exaggeration, just as the SIX MILLION FIGURE is often alleged
to be. (Note, I myself make no comment on this figure, since
mathematics is not my forte.) However, both figures have been advanced
by their respective propagandists. I decided to quote the 66 million
figure for two reasons: (a) because I believe it was mentioned by the
great Solzhenitsyn who was not given to lying; and (b) because the 66
million figure is actually mentioned in the title of Eustace Mullins’
classic essay, “The Secret Holocaust”, which I quoted extensively in my
article. (See here). Since I was quoting from Mullins, I decided to quote his figures also, giving my readers his viewpoint.
The most conservative figure for the
Russian Holocaust, now agreed upon by specialist historians and even
cited in the Times newspaper (UK) is 50 million dead Russians. This
figure was achieved within a 36-year period of mass murder (1917-1953),
initiated by Lenin the quarter-Jew and continued by Stalin, a Georgian
non-Jew, who surrounded himself on all sides by Jewish commissars and
sexy young Jewesses he liked to bed.
If you think fifty million deaths is an inflated figure, I assure you it is not.
One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar
Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty
million. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and
proclaimed, “Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her
skirts!”
Apart from Kaganovich, there were other
Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest
circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh
Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti
Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream
historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn’t they? —
given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a
bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his
basement — probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519 ).
At no other time in the history of the
world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was
between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags
and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.
America now faces a similar
saturation problem. There have been no Soviet-style massacres in America
— not yet, thank God. But who knows what grisly surprises history has
up its sleeve?
If the Jews can kill 50 million
people in Russia and get away with it, they can kill 50 million people
in America too, but maybe they won’t get away with it so easily next
time. If they can do it once, they can do it twice — unless the leopard
changes its spots.
SHAMIR: We know that
imperialist propaganda is able to utilize anti-Jewish prejudice in its
own interests: thus, when the Empire bombed Libya, its propagandists
improbably claimed that Qaddafi is a Jew and a sympathiser of Israel.
When the Empire hunted Julian Assange, its fifth column claimed that he
is a Mossad agent. For this reason one should be cautious at accepting
such claims: they can be done by enemies with subversive purpose.
Jews played an important part in Soviet
Russia’s life, and they paid for that by their obedience and strict
observance of Russia’s interests. If they strayed, they were severely
punished by Stalin; if they played ball, they were allowed to stay in
positions of power.
The lesson of Soviet Russia and Jews
was directly opposite to that read by Lasha: even if Jews play an
important role in the country, a determined ruler can correct and limit
their influence.
This can be done by undoing financial
capitalism. Not in vain, some Jewish pundits describe Occupy Wall Street
as an “anti-Semitic movement”. Though the participants surely harbor no
evil thoughts about the Jews, their goal of destroying the neoliberal
model is at variance with Jewish power structures. Without their money,
the Jews will shrink into mere shadows of themselves, and the nightmare
will be over.
DARKMOON: (summing up):
I am not really in disagreement with you on most important points. Even
though I have accused you of being guilty of a “glaring contradiction” —
your apparent U-turn on the unity of the Jews, once united like a swarm
of locusts flying in ordered ranks, now disunited and split into
several conflicting groups — this need not in fact be a contradiction at
all. It could be a development or new nuance to your views, an added
complexity; indeed, a kind of paradox in which the Jews are united and
disunited at the same time, just as the universe is filled with light
and darkness at the same time, and just as good and evil exist
simultaneously in the same heart.
On one point, however, I am forced to take issue with you: I never said that Germany and Russia were “Jewish colonies”.
America, yes; but not Germany and
Russia. And America only in a metaphorical sense. To all intents and
purposes, America has become a Jewish colony.
Jews did not emigrate to Germany and
Russia en masse as they emigrated to the United States. They were
already well entrenched in Germany and Russia, part of the unassimilated
population of those two nations for several centuries. They sprung to
prominence in Germany, reaching their maximum degree of influence in the
time of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933), just before the ascent of
Hitler to power.
In Russia, the Jews sprung to similar
prominence at the time of the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917, led on by
the Jew Lenin and his Shabbat goy henchman, Stalin, who was later to
become the world’s greatest mass murderer—aided and abetted by his
closely knit contingent of court Jews.
Never before have I read a biography
with so many Jews in the forefront, all seething like maggots in the
rich soil of Mother Russia, all thirsting like vampires for the blood of
their Christian victims.
Full marks to Simon Sebag Montefiore,
himself a Jew, for having the courage to draw our attention to these
frightening freaks of nature.
They belong in the seventh circle of Dante’s hell.
Dr Lasha Darkmoon (email her) is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Her articles can be sampled here, her poems here.
“We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.” — Israel Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001
“I don’t care if Americans think
we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the
government,” Jewish columnist Joel Stein wrote in the Los Angeles Times in December 2008. “I just care that we get to keep running them.”
Mr Stein’s reckless candor in admitting that the Jews ran America was to cost him his job at the LA Times.
If Americans have lost their country to
organized Jewry, they lost it slowly and imperceptibly. Indeed, most
Americans remain unaware that their country no longer belongs to them.
They fervently believe they still live in a democracy. This was a
takeover not without precedent, however. It had happened to Germany. It
had happened to Russia. It has now happened to America.
Take Germany and Russia.
Germany, a mere shadow of what it might
have been, is now a defeated and demoralized nation, thoroughly
browbeaten by Jewry and terrified of their masters in Israel. Without
stretching it too far, one could say that Germany has become Israel’s
cash cow.
There is nothing particularly controversial about this observation. It had occurred to Eustace Mullins over twenty years ago:
To finance
the State of Israel, which was created as a direct result of the Jewish
victory over the Christian nations in World War II, Jews…now imposed
enormous “reparations” demands on the conquered German people. To date,
they have extorted more than thirty-five billion dollars from German
workers, money which has been collected at the points of bayonets, not
Jewish bayonets but the bayonets of the American Army, which has been
maintained as an occupying force in West Germany for nearly four
decades, solely to provide military power behind the puppet German
Government which has as its primary function the furnishing of money for
the parasitic state of Israel. (See here)
In December 2009, the Israelis demanded another billion euros
from Germany ($1.4 billion). The survivors of the Holocaust,
surprisingly, seem to increase in number with time. This prompted Norman
Finkelstein’s mother to ask somewhat cynically, after she had been
cheated out of her reparations money by the rabbis who administered the
Holocaust Fund: “If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one,who did Hitler kill?”
Mullins is not exaggerating when he says
that the American troops foisted on Germany after World War II were in
fact an “occupying force”: an army moreover acting on behalf, and at the
behest, of organized Jewry.
It was the Morgenthau Plan, specifically
designed by the vengeful Henry Morgenthau as a collective punishment
against the German people for the crimes of Hitler, that was to turn
post-war Germany into “the largest concentration camp on earth.”
As late as 1991, German chancellors were still being forced, like enslaved vassals under the Roman Empire, to sign an “act of submission” to their Allied conquerors.
“The Jew Morgenthau wants to turn Germany into a giant potato patch,” Goebbels complained bitterly. He was right. Anti-Semites sometimes are.
Russia too, like Germany, was to fall under Jewish domination.
According to Solzhenitsyn in The Gulag Archipelago,66 million Russian Christians
were put to death on the orders of the Cheka or Russian secret police.
Those devising the tortures, and giving the orders to rape and kill
ethnic Russians, were mostly Jews. Yuri Slezkine’s candid quote from
historian Leonard Shapiro is too well known to be casually dismissed:
“Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood
a very good chance of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator.”
Out of 388 members of the new revolutionary government in Russia,
only sixteen were real Russians. “Apart from one negro,” we are told, “the rest were Jews.” These revolutionaries did their best to hide their Jewish identities
by taking new names. Lenin was originally Ulyanov, Trotsky was
Bronstein, Zinoviev was Apfelbaum, Sverdlov was Solomon, Zinoviev was
Radomyslsky, Radek was Sobelsohn, Litvonov was Wallach, Kamenev was
Rosenfeld, Parvus was Helphand, Martov was Zederbaum, Bohrin was
Nathanson. Not one of these Jewish revolutionaries was prepared to go
under his own name or be identified as a Jew.
Under Stalin, merely to
draw attention to the fact that unpopular officials were Jewish was to
incur the death penalty.
Another interesting titbit of information that court historians
prefer not to mention is this: many of the Jews propping up the new
Bolshevik government, happy to issue instructions for the torture and
execution of Russian Christians, were actually Jews who had been shipped
in from the East Side of New York.
No surprise here. After all, the man who helped to finance the Russian
Revolution from his base in Wall Street—to the tune of $20 million—was
Jewish American banker Jacob Schiff.
A well-known French journal, L’Illustration, had this to say in its edition of September 14, 1918:
When one comes in contact
with the functionaries serving in the Bolshevik Government, one feature
strikes the attention: almost all of them are Jews. I am not at all
anti-Semitic, but I must state what strikes the eye. Everywhere—in
Petrograd, in Moscow, in provincial districts, in commissariats, in
district offices, in Smolny, in the Soviets—I have met nothing but Jews
and again Jews. (See here)
Germany…Russia…America. They all fell under Jewish hegemony. They had their hour in the sun, and then they had their eclipse.
It’s now America’s turn.
President George W. Bush and his Jewish entourage
“Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away.” — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, 2002. (Widely reported, see here)
Israel, America’s albatross
In Part 1 of my article, Goodbye, America,
I discussed the problems facing America today and suggested that they
are far more serious than those facing National Socialist Germany in the
1930s. Of the seven problems I listed, the four most intractable ones
are these:
The nuclear-armed state of Israel and
its Samson Option, neither of which existed as threats to peace before
the establishment of the Zionist state in the wake of WW-2.
The presence of 60 million Christian
Zionists in America who are hand in glove with our new Masters, aiding
and abetting them in their violation of international law and the
ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people.
The existence of a tentacular network
of Jewish organizations in America, such as the ADL and AIPAC, holding
the entire country to ransom; specifically, its mercenary and morally
bankrupt politicans.
The lethal weapon of multiculturalism, a
weapon unavailable for use against either Germany or Russia but now
deployed to devastating effect against America’s Euro-American majority.“Global elites view the White Western world as the main obstacle standing in the way of a future world government,” Pat Buchanan is widely reported to have said in a 2004 speech. “Multiculturalism is a tool used by such elites to dismantle White Western civilization.”
Given that the Jews managed to achieve almost complete control of Germany and Russia even before
the foundation of the Jewish state in 1948, it must surely be obvious
that their executive power has increased exponentially with the
acquisition of a military base in the Middle East, armed to the teeth
with the deadliest nuclear warheads, many of these aimed at European capitals
and some of them probably at the United States. It would be foolish to
think that a country that killed Americans in cold blood in the USS
Liberty attack of 1967, would have any scruples about doing so on a much
vaster scale if ever America became the object of their hatred.
It is important at his point to consider the hidden facts surrounding
the foundation of the state of Israel, if only because this will help
us to get a better perspective of the Jewish problem.
The Jews were given Israel on the tacit understanding that most of them would go and live there, leaving the rest of the world Judenfrei
or Jew-free. They reneged on their collective promise however—made
implicitly on their behalf by their then leaders Theodor Hertzl and
Chaim Weizmann—and they prefer now to regard Israel as a second home and
place of refuge if things get too hot for them elsewhere.
Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs:
Whenever the quantity of
Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts
against them. [This] reaction…cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism in
the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and
economic concomitant of Jewish immigration, and we cannot shake it off. —
Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949). Quoted in Albert S.
Lindemann’s The Jew Accused, 1991 (p. 277).
Herzl himself had made the same point much earlier. Anti-Semitism, he
wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish defects.” And in his
diary he added: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.”
(See here)
Having been given a homeland on the tacit understanding that they had
to go and live there, the Jews were clearly under an obligation to do
so. The object of the exercise is otherwise defeated. So why is it that
58 percent of the world’s 14 million Jews now live in America and Europe
and only 37 percent in Israel?
It certainly needs to be asked: why were
the Palestinians expelled from their own country in order to
accommodate another people who mostly choose to live elsewhere?
A Palestinian woman being attacked by Jewish settlers
“Nothing here in America compares to the horrors of Palestine….
Women are raped by Israeli military officials….Palestinian children
are doused with gasoline and set on fire for the amusement of the IDF.” — Jonathan Azaziah, Mizrahi American Jew
It is almost universally believed, thanks to Jewish ownership of the
mass media, that the UN created Israel and that everyone was delighted
when this happened. This is demonstrably false. Even the US
government—or 99 percent of it—was adamantly opposed to the foundation
of Israel. Indeed, former Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson was one
of many who raised strenuous objections to America recognizing the
Jewish state, predicting that “the West would pay a high price for
Israel.” In spite of all these misgivings, the Jews got their state.
In reality [Alison Weir notes] while the UN General Assembly recommended the creation of a Jewish state in part of Palestine, that recommendation was non-binding and never implemented by the Security Council. Second, the General Assembly passed that recommendation only after Israel proponents threatened and bribed numerous countries in order to gain a required two-thirds of votes. Third, the US administration supported
the recommendation out of domestic electoral considerations, and took
this position over the strenuous objections of the State Department, the CIA, and the Pentagon. Despite the shallow patina of legality its partisans extracted from the General Assembly, Israel was born over the opposition of American experts and of governments around the world, who opposed it on both pragmatic and moral grounds.
Why the Zionist landgrabbers should now
be held in such high esteem in America and elsewhere, and their
Palestinian victims spat upon and spurned at every opportunity, can be
easily explained.
Apart from the Jewish-owned mass media
which has managed to glamorize and cast a rose-tinted glow over its
Frankenstein monster, the answer lies in one word: Holocaust. The
Zionists have managed to convince the world that they are the moral
legatees of the victims of the Holocaust. As such, they remain the
Ultimate Victims.
Like Finkelstein, we are entitled to express concern over the cheap exploitation of Jewish suffering. It is an undeniable fact that the Holocaust is a major industry and that it is used as moral blackmail and carte blanche for monstrous crimes.
Israeli writer Ari Shavit summed it up neatly when he said: “We may murder with impunity, because the Holocaust museum is on our side”.
The Enemy Within
It can be convincingly argued, with a wealth of supportive
quotations, that the presence of Jews in large numbers in any given
country has always had catastrophic consequences for that country. (See
Weizmann and Herzl quotes above). Organized Jewry has now spread its
influence far and wide via the internet, newspapers, magazines and
books. Hollywood, its most effective hasbara agent, spreads its
poisonous propaganda all over the world, offering the ill-educated
masses its lies and distortions and its laissez-faire Freudian sexual morality. Meanwhile the porn industry, dominated by Jews,
promotes the demoralization of countless millions, creating sex addicts
even out of children and driving many of its victims to despair and suicide.
With the triumph of Jewry comes the subjugation and enslavement of
the entire non-Jewish world. Christianity becomes the first casualty,
the family unit the second. Homosexuality and radical feminism become
more strident in their attitudes and more extreme in their demands,
opening up a Pandora’s box of evils: the push to normalize pedophilia, for example, and the systematic corruption of children through the promotion of child porn in the classroom.
We are in a critical situation. It was never Palestine on its own
that organized Jewry wanted. Palestine was simply to be their base of
operations for the conquest of the rest of the world. According to
Israel Shamir:
Palestine is not the ultimate goal of the Jews; the world is.
Palestine is just the place for world state headquarters…..The Jews
intend to turn Jerusalem into the supreme capital of the world, and its
rebuilt temple into the focal point of the Spirit on Earth. Christianity
will die, the spirit will depart from the nations in our part of the
world, and our present dubious democracy will be supplanted by a vast
theocratic state. De-spiritualized and uprooted, homeless and lonely,
yesterday’s Masters of the World [WASPs] will become slaves in all but name….The
Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US,
as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of
ordinary people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good
time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The
regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.
The runes are easy enough to read. From
the domination of Germany and Russia, the Jews contrived to leapfrog to
the domination of America.
We see through a glass darkly, but what
we see through the gathering gloom is the grim specter of an American
dystopia: a Third World country hardly worth living in for its rapidly
diminishing Euro-American majority.
It costs the American taxpayer $12 million an hour
just to keep US troops in Afghanistan, a country America decided to
invade on a rollercoaster of neoconservative lies. “The neocons,” Gilad
Azmon comments cuttingly in a recent book, “transform the American army
into an Israeli mission force.”
Incredibly, America’s closest ally, Israel, has yet to contribute a single
soldier to Washington’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nor are American
Jews particularly noted for their presence, let alone their heroism, in
the fighting forces. And yet they fight with their pens most valiantly,
far from the din of battle. It is they who beat the war drums the
loudest, who profit most from the wanton slaughter of innocents, and who
“get others to fight and die for them.”
The days of wine and roses are over. The American Dream is dead. Like Germany and Russia before it, America lies vanquished.
WE ARE THE NEW MASTERS!
“The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for
three thousand years is at last within our reach. I can safely promise
you that our race will soon take its rightful place in the
world, with every Jew a king and every Gentile a slave.” — Rabbi Emmanuel Rabbinovich, speech delivered at a special conference of European rabbis in Budapest, January 12, 1952
Ruled by a Jewish elite and their Shabbat goy underlings, beyond the reach of international law and hated throughout the world, America is now an Israeli colony in all but name.
===========================
AMERICA VANQUISHED, Part 2: America under Jewish Rule
“When the world looks at America, what it sees is an Israeli colony.”
— Paul Craig Roberts
America has been taken over.
Slowly and imperceptibly, duped by lies
and lulled into complacency, Americans have let their country slip into
the hands of a fifth column: of a hostile ethnic elite whose primary
allegiance is to Israel, a country built on stolen land and engaged in
systematic genocide.
This is the rogue state that is arguably
responsible for the greatest mass murder in history: the catastrophe of
9-11. If scientific evidence and forensic logic are anything to go on,
Israel has to be suspect number one here, given its unbroken record of
terrorism and its endless breaches of international law. Any country
that can orchestrate such a spectacular crime and get away with it—while
somehow managing to pin the blame on nineteen Arabs with box cutters—is
clearly a force to be reckoned with.
More than 200 senior military,
intelligence, and law enforcement officials, including two generals,
have now questioned the 9-11 Commission’s report. They have been joined
by over 1500 top architects and engineers, 250 pilots and aviation
experts, 400 university professors, and 250 survivors and their
families. David Ray Griffin, author of eleven books on 9-11 and a
distinguished professor emeritus, has concluded definitively: “All the
proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9-11 appears
to have been fabricated.”
Dr Alan Sabrosky, former director of the
Army War College, has upped the ante and unequivocally identified
Israel as the guilty party. “What we need to stand up and say is not
only did they [the Israelis] attack the USS Liberty, but that it is 100
percent certain 9/11 was a Mossad operation.”
If any further proof were needed of
America’s abject enslavement to Zionist interests, however, it would be
Obama’s humiliation at the hands of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu earlier this year. This humiliation has occurred on three
separate occasions: in September 2009, in July 2010, and again only last
May. Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank writes almost gloatingly of Obama flying “the white flag of surrender” in the White House—where he sat “routed and humiliated.”
Obama’s offense?
He had asked the Israelis to observe
international law by stopping settlement construction on Palestinian
land. He had pleaded with them to withdraw to the 1967 borders, in
accordance with UN Resolution 242—a reasonable enough request which
every American President before him has asked the Israelis to consider
in the interests of peace.
The Israeli Prime Minister’s response? — “Israel will NOT return to the indefensible boundaries of 1967!”
So how is it that this rude and
recalcitrant “ally” of America still continues to receive its $3 billion
a year subsidy? Is America so besotted with love for the Jewish state
that it cannot say ‘No’?
Silly question. Since it rests on the
Chomskyite assumption that America is still the lord and master and
little Israel the dependent colony.
The riddle is easily solved if one turns
Chomsky’s assumption on its head: organized Jewry, having taken over
America, has transformed it into an Israeli colony. The $8.2 million per day
that the American taxpayer pays his Jewish master is not a subsidy. It
is tribute money. It is a tax or levy imposed on a vanquished people by
their conquerors.
Hear the note of contempt for one’s own President in this extraordinary account of Obama’s humiliation at the hands of Netanyahu, his Jewish victor:
Netanyahu
beat Obama like a red-headed stepchild; he played him like a fiddle; he
pounded him like a big brass drum. The Prime Minister of Israel danced
rings around his arrogant, professorial opponent. The Prime Minister
mopped the floor with our guy….Bibi ripped him to shreds…demonstrating
to the whole world that the Prime Minister of Israel has substantially
more support in both the House and the Senate than the President of the
United States.
I guess that says it all. Poor Obama. He
has been symbolically castrated and buried in excrement up to the neck.
Those 29 standing ovations Netanyahu received in Congress were
equivalent to a lump of spit in the President’s face.
According to political pundit Philip Giraldi,
this was “the first time in recorded history that a small nation with
less than eight million citizens has subjugated a much larger country
with a population of more than 310 million.”
The Zionization of America is complete,
with AIPAC appointing the government and 60 million Christian Zionists
ready to die for their new masters in Jerusalem.
“I’ve never seen a President
stand up to them. They always get what they want. If the American people
understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they
would rise up in arms.” (Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1983)
At this point I feel the need to
apologize for the picture of the finger-wagging rabbi at the end of Part
1 of this essay, together with the inflammatory words he is purported
to have uttered about the Jewish desire for world domination. I can hear
my critics cry: “Silly airhead, why do you spout all this Protocolian
poppycock? Don’t you know the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is an anti-Semitic forgery?”
Yes, I confess with a sigh that I have
heard the word “forgery” often advanced as a reason not to read this
brilliant political treatise, second only to Plato’s Republic in its profundity.
What I am saying, however, has nothing to do with the Protocols. I am not a conspiracy theorist. I am a historian who is interested only in facts. Truth alone stirs my heart.
Let’s take another quick look at Zionism.
In a recent essay called Why Palestine is Important, Israel Shamir presents a picture that puts this entire Protocolian nonsense into perspective:
Palestine is important because it is
believed to be a linchpin of Empire, one of the key points necessary to
control the world. Such was the conviction of the 19th
century British Empire-builders of the Rhodes variety….Once an arcane
theory developed by HJ Mackinder, it has grown up to become a driving
force behind globalism …. Mackinder planned the subjugation of the whole
planet to the Empire …. Napoleon [had earlier] toyed with the idea of
planting Jews in Palestine as France’s foot soldiers, but there were no
takers among Jews. The Brits achieved what the French could not.
Zionism, in other words, according to
Shamir’s recent take on the subject, was a British inspiration and a
tool in the armory of Pax Britannica. It was the way the Brits
intended to conquer the world. They would plonk the unwanted Jews in
Palestine as their proxies. Israel, in effect, was to be a British
colony. And Lord Balfour, when he drew up the famous Balfour Declaration
in 1917, had a glint in his beady little eye. He was more interested in
advancing the designs of the British Empire than in being nice to the
Jews.
If all this is true—and I think it
possibly is—we can see what happened next. By 1948 the British Empire
had collapsed in ruins. It was no longer in a position to use Israel as
its cat’s paw. Another emerging nation however, the chief beneficiary of
World War II, certainly was. This was America. Yet even as far back as
1948, America was largely controlled by its Jews. Their influence,
though it was to grow by leaps and bounds after 1967, was enormous even
in 1948.
It was the Jews who twisted President
Truman’s arm and got him to give his full backing to their fledgling
state. It was the Jews again, through the vengeful Morgenthau, as I
indicated in Part 1 of this essay, who were to make life a living hell
for the conquered Germans in the aftermath of World War II. The Jews
were always in the background, it seems, the shadowy lurkers in the
cabbage patch of history.
The colony that the Brits had failed to
acquire in the Middle East, Israel, was inherited by America. So Chomsky
was right after all. To start with, anyway. Israel was to be America’s
aircraft carrier in the Middle East. The Americans would use it as a
gigantic military base from which to plunder Arab oil. Nor would they
have any problems with Ben Gurion’s dreams of a Greater Israel
stretching from the Nile to the Euphrates. After all, why not give the
Jews what they wanted?
Greater Israel was simply to be an extension of America: its fifty-first state.
Things didn’t work out as
planned. The best-laid schemes of mice and men, we are told, often go
askew. The tables were turned on the simple-minded Americans. The Jews
were much smarter than their WASP masters could ever be. They had
acquired through three thousand years of bitter experience the arts of
duplicity and cunning. Guile was their genetic patrimony. They were the
Ultimate Survivors.
One has to hand it to the Jews. The hitherto oppressed
decided to become the oppressors. The former victims decided to take on
the role of predators. The cat’s paw decided it would rather be the Cat
from now on—and it became the Cat’s Pajamas. In short, the Jews took over America and turned it into a
Jewish colony. As simple as that. Their American hosts were hoist with
their own petard.
But why worry? American Jews are
Americans, are they not? If they’re smart enough to take over America,
as they have demonstrably done, why shouldn’t they proceed to the next
logical step and take over the world—yes, dominate the world through
America? No one denies this is America’s aim: full spectrum dominance.
So if the Jews control America, and if America controls the world,
doesn’t it follow logically that the Jews control the world? The logic
is irrefutable.
Jewish world domination takes on
a different perspective when viewed through this historical prism. No
“conspiracy theories” here. No hook-nosed Jews grasping the globe in
their cruel talons. No Illuminati trying to sodomize your children and
drink their blood. Just logic. Just history. Just America striving for
full-spectrum dominance with Jews leading the pack.
You could say the wild-eyed dreams of the Protocols have at last been realized, but not in the way their original masterminds intended.
The shape of things to come…?
Allow me now to present the testimony of
Eustace Mullins, if only for the vivid pictures he presents to the mind
of the terrors endured by millions of Russian Christians in Bolshevik
Russia when it was under Jewish hegemony. Could this be the fate of
American Christians in the not too distant future?
There are too many well
documented massacres in history in which the Jews tortured and murdered
their victims with the greatest glee, gloating in such barbaric
practices as tearing out the hearts of women and children and smearing
the blood on their faces.
The orgy of murder, torture and
pillage which followed the Jewish triumph in Russia [after the Bolshevik
Revolution of 1917] has never been equaled in the history of the world.
The Jews were free to indulge their most fervent fantasies of mass
murder of helpless victims.
Christians were dragged from
their beds, tortured and killed. Some were actually sliced to pieces,
bit by bit, while others were branded with hot irons, their eyes poked
out to induce unbearable pain.
Others were placed in boxes…then
hungry rats placed in the boxes to gnaw upon their bodies. Some were
nailed to the ceiling by their fingers or by their feet, and left
hanging until they died of exhaustion.
Others were chained to the floor
and hot lead poured into their mouths. Many were tied to horses and
dragged through the streets of the city, while the mob attacked them
with rocks and kicked them to death.
Mothers were taken to the public
square and their babies snatched from their arms….the baby [was] tossed
into the air while another member of the mob rushed to catch it on the
tip of his bayonet.
Pregnant Christian women were chained to trees and their babies cut out of their bodies. (See here)
“We should never forget what happened when Jews were a hostile elite
in the USSR,” Prof. Kevin MacDonald notes bleakly. “The loathing and
contempt for the traditional people and culture of Russia was a major
factor in the avid Jewish participation in the greatest crimes of the 20th century.”
MacDonald is referring to the systematic murder of over 50 million Russians under Lenin and Stalin: a period of mass murder spanning 36 years (1917-1953).
The new American elite—as I pointed out
in Part 1 of this article, “America as an Israeli Colony”—is a Jewish
elite. Exactly like the elite in Bolshevik Russia and Stalin’s USSR. And
it is essentially a hostile elite that “loathes the nation it rules.”
So we need to watch out.
Because what happened to millions of Russians in the first half of the 20th century—systematic genocide—could well happen to millions of Americans in the foreseeable future.
“It is quite possible,” Kevin MacDonald muses, “that we are entering into a racial dystopia of unimaginable cruelty.”
A game called Survival
The extraordinary success of the Jews,
who make up only 2.5 percent of America’s population, can be attributed
to meticulous organization, coordination and networking. This
advantageous cohesiveness derives from an evolutionary characteristic of
the Jews: an exceptionally strong ethnocentricism which has enabled
them to infiltrate almost every single organization that could possibly
threaten them as a group. In America, highly gifted Jews whose primary
loyalty is to Israel have managed to insinuate their way into key policy
positions, including the Departments of Treasury and State, the
Pentagon, the National Security Council and the White House.
Over the past 24 months not a single policy maker [James Petras tells us]
has voiced any criticism of Israel’s most heinous crimes, ranging from
the savaging of Gaza to the massacre of the humanitarian flotilla and
the expansion of new settlements in Jerusalem and the West Bank….Many of
the leading Zionist policy makers rose to power through a deliberate
strategy of infiltrating the government to shape policy promoting
Israel’s interest over and above the interests of the US populace.
If the goyim have lost the game of life
and their hard-won freedoms to the Jews, it was because they didn’t know
they were playing a game in the first place. A game for the highest
possible stakes.
A game called Survival.
Conclusion
The world that awaits us, if our New
Masters prevail, will be a grim dystopia. It will be a spiritual
wasteland in which an unprincipled elite rides roughshod over the
teeming masses. It will be a cruel world of exploitation, moral
darkness, and unspeakable brutality.
“Death solves all problems,” Stalin quipped cynically. “No man, no problem.” When mass extermination becomes the miracle cure, exciting times can be expected.
In Otto Friedrich’s widely acclaimed Holocaust study, The Kingdom of Auschwitz, a concentration camp survivor is quoted as saying:
Concentration camp existence taught us that the
whole world is really like a concentration camp. The world is ruled by
neither justice nor morality. Crime is not punished nor virtue rewarded.
The world is ruled by power. We are laying the foundation for some new,
monstrous civilization.
An innocent victim of this “new, monstrous civilization”, a Palestinian child, his arm cut off by an Israeli settler for throwing a stone. (See here)
So this is where we are now: in the eye of the storm.
America, once a democracy, is
now a crypto-fascist country ruled by a corporate and cosmopolitan
elite. “There is no freedom, no democracy, and no government
accountability in Amerika, a fascist state,” Paul Craig Roberts concludes ruefully in one of his recent essays.
The Jews, fulfilling the wildest dreams conjured up in the Protocols,
stand surveying the killing fields of the world they have conquered.
Iraq and Afghanistan lie in ruins, thanks to their machinations. Iran
lies in the cross-hairs, awaiting its expected doom. And meanwhile in
America, as the body bags are flown in from foreign parts and the lurid
circus of bread and games grinds on relentlessly, there is nothing much
to live for except sex and death.
Stalin’s willing executioners,
the Jews, are now the ruling elite in America. As in Weimar Germany, the
Jews make most of the money and help to create a culture of
neo-paganism and nihilism, decadence and despair. Nothing has changed
except the country.
Russia, Germany, America — they all went down like skittles in a row.
THE SHAPE OF THINGS TO COME:
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.” — George Orwell, 1984
Part 1: The Jewish Problem in Historical Perspective
“As far as I know, no one has
ever come up with an effective solution to the Jewish problem. Solving
the riddle of the Sphinx would be easier.”
“Wherever the Jew is found he is a problem, a source of unhappiness to himself and to those around him.” — Maurice Samuel, You Gentiles
1. Why all attempts to solve the Jewish Problem have failed
The Jewish Problem, more commonly and euphemistically known as the “Jewish Question“, has agitated the minds of political analysts throughout history but has remained unresolved to this day.
For centuries, a ready and makeshift solution to the problem consisted in the mass expulsion of the Jews.
Just get rid of the Jews, it was thought, and the problem would go away.This
didn’t work. The Jews simply migrated and created problems elsewhere.
And then, after a few years, their descendants came trickling back into
the same countries from which their ancestors had been forcibly evicted.
Here is Queen Maria Theresa in a decree
dated 1777, during the heyday of the Enlightenment period. The Queen of
Austria-Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia, Mantua, Milan, Galicia, Parma and the
Austrian Netherlands had grown weary of the Jews and the never-ending
problems they had caused in her extensive dominions. Her expulsion order
is typical of the many others issued by other countries before her
time, so we shall quote the angry queen in her own words:
“Henceforth no
Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without
my written permission. I know of no other troublesome plague within the
state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud,
usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man
despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as
much as possible.” (See here)
Though Jews have been expelled from 109 locations from AD 250, expulsion failed to solve the Jewish Problem.
♣
The next attempted solution to the
Jewish problem, primarily advocated by the Jews themselves and their
philosemitic supporters, was complete emancipation of the Jews.
It was widely believed that if their
crippling disabilities were removed, and if Jews were made equal
citizens, that the Jewish problem would just “disappear” — especially
with assimilation. The Jew’s antisocial behavior, it was argued, was the
natural result of his unfair treatment. Treat him well and he would
behave properly.
It
was always understood that assimilation was a necessary precondition for
Jewish emancipation. In order to become equal citizens, Jews had to
promise to fit in with the society around them and become part of a
happy and homogenous whole.
They
were told: intermarry with the natives, convert to Christianity, learn
the language of the country, dress like other people, adopt the manners
and customs of those around you, and, above all, take a back seat and keep out of trouble.
It was a rare Jew who followed all
these instructions to the letter. Some refused to follow any. As for
the final injunction — take a back seat and keep out of trouble — most
Jews found this impossible to keep. It ran against the grain of their
nature. It was almost like expecting a cat not to kill birds or a fox
not to raid the hen house.
The Jews received their first emancipation in France.
This was in 1791 after the French Revolution, a catastrophic event
engineered by Masonic secret societies in which the Jews featured
predominantly and wielded the most influence. Several other revolutions
were to follow in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. All of
these, without exception, were masterminded by Jews.
“At the front of every one of these
revolutionary movements for the destruction of authority, nationhood and
religion,” noted an eminent elder statesman, “you find a Jew.”
These inflammatory words were written by
Benjamin Disraeli, Prime Minister of England, himself a Jew who had
converted to Christianity.
♣
Emancipation proceeded at a rapid rate
in country after country throughout the 19th century. Far from
“solving” the Jewish problem, this merely made matters worse. This was
because Jewish emancipation inevitably led to Jewish supremacy.
Every single country that emancipated its Jews was soon taken over by Jews.
In Russia, the Jews took their
emancipation by force. This was in 1917 after the Bolshevik Revolution:
an event carefully planned, financed, and largely administered by Jews
from New York. Communism was then ushered in, the Pale of Settlement
abolished, and Jews thereafter emigrated in swarms to the United States,
Canada, South America, various other European countries, and, finally,
to Palestine — where they immediately began to make themselves a
thorough nuisance to the Arabs.
Did emancipating the Jews in Russia
solve the Jewish problem? No, it did not. It made matters infinitely
worse: not only in Russia but in every single country to which these
refugees from the Pale of Settlement came with their beaky noses under black hats, their raggedy beards, their wild eyes, and their clackclacking Yiddisher tongues.
The Red Terror was soon to follow. The
Russian peasants, who constituted 90 percent of the population at that
time, were massacred in their millions, with Jewish commissars in the
vanguard giving the orders to kill. Blood ran in rivers through the
streets of Moscow and St Petersburg, much to the delight of psychopaths
like Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich, and Ilya Ehrenberg — all of them
Jews with lots of blood on their hands.
Over 66 million Russian
Christians, according to Solzhenitsyn, were genocided by an essentially
Jewish regime in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1953. In comparison,
the French Revolution had been a nun’s picnic.
Here is the psychopathic Leon Trotsky, shortly after the violent emancipation of Jews in Russia that followed in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution (1917):
“We must turn
Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall
impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt
of…. We shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human
losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison…. By means of
terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a
state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.” (Full quote here)
— From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.
2. Zionism promoted as a solution to the Jewish Problem
A new “cure” for the Jewish problem
was offered by Theodor Herzl in the late 1890s: Zionism. “Give us a
country of our own,” the Zionists said in so many words, “and this will
solve the Jewish problem.”
Quite simply, the idea was this: if Jews
were given their own country, they would all go and live there and get
out of everyone’s way. It was thought that the removal of their presence
from every country, as they proceeded to settle in their new homeland,
Israel, would solve the Jewish problem once and for all.
The formula was axiomatic and self-evident: No Jews, no Jewish Problem.
Is it anti-Semitic to say this? No, it
is not, given that the pioneers of Zionism put forward exactly the same
idea in different words. They demanded a separate Jewish homeland for
Jews on the grounds that Jews were a headstrong and highly-strung race
incapable of living in other people’s countries without creating
problems sooner or later. The Talmudic mentality insisted: we Jews will
not take orders from our inferiors.
Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs:
“Whenever
the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that
country reacts against them. [This] reaction…cannot be looked upon as
anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a
universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration, and we
cannot shake it off. — Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949). Quoted
in Albert S. Lindemann’s The Jew Accused, 1991 (p. 277).
Theodore Herzl, the founder of
Zionism, had himself made the same point much earlier. “Anti-Semitism,”
he wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish defects.” And in his
diary he added: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.”
(See here)
It has long been recognized by
intelligent Jews that mutual antagonism between Jew and gentile is only
to be expected, and that any attempt to achieve lasting peace and
harmony between the two groups is doomed to failure. “I do not believe
that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable,”
Jewish author Maurice Samuel points out in his book You Gentiles.
“You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation.
There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate
contact.” (See here)
3. Why Zionism failed to solve the Jewish problem
Zionism seemed a neat solution
to the Jewish problem initially. This was because, on the one hand, it
meant that the Jews got their own country; and, on the other, it meant
that non-Jews got rid of Jews and no longer had to put up with their
pesky presence — which, as both Herzl and Weizmann had already conceded,
was the root cause of anti-Semitism.
And so it came about that Zionism was
widely seen in these early days as an original and workable solution to
the Jewish problem, even though Zionism meant stealing Arab land on
which to park this recalcitrant race of rootless cosmopolitans.
The awkward question nevertheless needs to be asked: did Zionism actually succeed
in solving the Jewish problem, as it was widely expected to do? No,
unfortunately it did not. Like all other solutions hitherto tried,
Zionism was to prove an abysmal failure.
This was because Jewish leaders reneged
on their implicit promise, or rather on the tacit understanding, that
those who are given a homeland are under obligation to go and live
there. The Jews were expected to emigrate to Israel en masse, thereby
solving the Jewish Problem by removing the root cause of the problem,
i.e., themselves: meaning, their presence in other people’s countries as undesirable maladapts.
The Jews’ reluctance to emigrate to
Israel en masse after 1948 defeated the whole purpose of giving them
their own country in the first place. It made a mockery of Zionism and
its rationale.
There are almost as many Jews in North
America today (5.8 million) as there are in Israel (5.9 million). An
enormous 40 percent of world Jewry now choose to live in the United
States. Vast numbers of Jews moreover continue to live in other
people’s countries where they continue to excite anti-Semitism by their
domineering presence, their over-representation in key professions,
their tendency to network, and their constant involvement in fraud and
financial scams.
This was not as it was meant to be. Why
give the Jews a homeland if they refuse to live there? Why buy a man a
horse, you might similarly ask, if he refuses to ride it?
So here we are now: at this awkward impasse.
By giving the Jews Israel, the Brits and
the Americans possibly made history’s most costly mistake. No decision
they could have made is likely to have more catastrophic consequences.
The Jews now have nuclear weapons. More than once, they have threatened the world
with their Samson Option, i.e., world annihilation if ever Israel is
existentially threatened. And needless to say, they are currently
engaged in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians, a people whose only
crime is that they happen to own the land the Jews covet.
Adolf Hitler once described America as the Jews’ “new hunting grounds”.
I apologize for quoting the most hated man in history, but it seems
there were times when Hitler actually hit the nail on the head. With
remarkable prescience, he saw that the state of Israel would one day
develop into organized Jewry’s international crime base from which it
would plunder other countries, including America, with impunity:
“It
doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine
for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization
for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign
rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11
THE THEFT OF PALESTINE
In 1946 the Jews owned 6 percent of Palestine. Today they occupy (illegally) roughly 90 percent.
ISRAEL TODAY
In his final years, Stalin appears to
have developed a negative attitude toward Israel, seeing it as a giant
military base run by a Jew-controlled America that would one day
threaten the vital interests of the Soviet Union. Before he could do
anything about it, Stalin was assassinated.
The one man who could have stopped
international Jewry in its tracks, as it ran its rollercoaster ride to
world domination with the United States as its battering ram, had been
secretly poisoned to death — either by Beria, thought by many to be Jewish, or by another Jew in Stalin’s entourage.
The date of Stalin’s death, March 1, 1953, happened by a strange coincidence to fall on the Jewish feast of Purim.
International Jewry today continues its triumphant march in North America, Europe and elsewhere.
======================
Part 2: Seven Drastic Remedies for the Jewish Problem
Francesco Hayez — The Fall of the Temple
“A good time for the Jews is
not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for
others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody
else.” — Israel Shamir
1. What is good for the Jews is bad for everyone else
“World
power belongs to Jewry. The twilight of the gods has come upon us: you,
the Jews, are the masters, and we are the slaves.” — Wilhelm Marr, 1879
As things get better for the Jews,
they get worse for everyone else — a pattern repeated in every single
country where Jews have gained a foothold.
Take Germany, for example. Germany
emancipated its Jews in 1871, making them equal citizens. By 1879, a
mere eight years later, the Germans were complaining bitterly that they
had been taken over by the Jews.
“[My words] must
be understood as a “scream of pain” coming from the oppressed. Resigned
pessimism flows from my pen. I shall announce, loudly and without any
attempt at irony, that Judaism has triumphed on a worldwide historical
basis…. I am sure that I have said what millions of Jews are quietly
thinking. World power belongs to Jewry. The twilight of the gods has
come upon us: you, the Jews, are the masters, and we are the slaves.
What is there left to us? Let us accept the inescapable, since we can’t
change it. Its name is: Finis Germaniae—THE END OF GERMANY!”
Today, white Americans are incomparably
worse off than they were 50-60 years ago. Jews, on the other hand, are
incomparably better off, owning a disproportionate amount of American
wealth. Whether this is due to their own superior talents or to
networking, banking and stock market manipulations, and financial scams à
la Bernie Madoff, is another question.
Given that Jews make up 2 percent of the
American population, the Forbes List of America’s 400 richest men ought
properly to contain on it the names of eight Jews only. The last time we checked, there were 139 Jews ranked among America’s 400 richest men.
Most of America’s richest billionaires today are Jewish. Whites, Asians, Hispanics and Blacks are left far behind. (See graph)
The richer the Jews get, the more
everyone else suffers, as Samuel Marr had argued as early as 1879 in the
passage cited above. It’s the same in all other countries. There has
been a massive transfer of wealth from non-Jewish into Jewish hands over
the last 50 years.
According to Israel Shamir:
The Jewish
universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as
Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary
people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good time for
mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes
that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.
The problem is compounded by the fact
that right now elite international Jewry seems to have tightened its
grip on North America and Europe to an unimaginable degree. The Jews
call the shots everywhere in these increasingly “Jewified” continents,
wielding disproportionate influence through their control of the media.
They foment wars in foreign countries and sexual decadence wherever they
manage to gain a foothold — as, for example, in Weimar Germany.
And then there’sthe immigrant problem deliberately created by the Jews in order to weaken and destroy the White race — “the cancer of human history“, according to Jewish writer Susan Sontag.
Jews have been the ringleaders
responsible for flooding the White man’s homelands with endless hordes
of immigrants, creating in the process a multicultural menagerie which
will eventually lead to the metamorphosis of Whites into “a mongrelized
slave race of low-IQ, mud-colored runts.” (Anonymous correspondent,
email).
Israel, however, remains resolutely
mono-cultural and opposed to non-Jewish immigration, an apartheid
society in which only Jews matter and where every other ethnic group is
discriminated against and treated with barely disguised contempt.
There is an old Latin proverb that goes, Remedio amaro amaram bilem diluunt;
literally, “With a bitter remedy they wash away the bitter bile.”
Translated into elegant English, this gives us the wise adage: “Drastic remedies for drastic diseases.”
If we may venture to do so without giving offense, let’s now consider some drastic remedies for the Jewish problem.
2. Seven drastic remedies for the Jewish problem
Among the various remedial measures for
tackling the Jewish problem, the following seven may be mentioned as the
most drastic and extreme. I would like to make it clear that I am not
myself recommending these seven measures en bloc. I am simply reporting the suggestions put forward by other people at various times:
(1) Mass extermination of the Jews.
(2) Quarantine or sequestration of Jews in separate secure locations.
(3) Mass sterilization of the Jews.
(4) Confiscation (or nationalization) of all Jewish assets and property.
(5) Emancipation of the media from Jewish monopoly control.
(6) The immediate abolition of the state of Israel and the restoration of Palestine to the Arabs, with full reparations.
(7) De-emancipation of Jews, i.e., the re-imposition of severe restrictions on Jews and their various fields of activity and areas of influence.
While all seven of these plans for
dealing with the Jews can be described as “drastic”, some are more
drastic than others. The solution calling for mass extermination is
clearly the most drastic, closely followed by mass sterilization. Both
these measures lead to the complete destruction of Jewry: one quickly
and violently, the other slowly and gently. Both are genocide.
Quarantining of Jews, confiscation of
their wealth, and the abolition of Israel are milder “solutions” to the
Jewish problem because at least they allow the Jews to go on living,
albeit with a severe curtailment of their liberties. Their ostensible
aim is to put a stop to Jewish exploitation and criminality, and, above
all, to prevent cultural contamination through the Jew-owned media.
It is inconceivable that the Jewish
problem could ever be solved as long as Israel exists and as long as the
mass media remains in Jewish hands. So these two preliminary steps are
of paramount importance if the world is to be saved from Jewish
encroachments: the abolition of Israel and the emancipation of the media
from Jewish monopoly.
Finally, there is the de-emancipation of
Jewry. This is the least draconian of the seven measures mentioned
above: it not only allows the Jews to go on living, but it allows them
to go on living in the midst of the gentiles. It is designed to ensure
that Jewish influence is kept to a minimum. Jews are free to do what
they want provided they keep out of public affairs and stop harming the
surrounding non-Jewish population, e.g., by peddling sexual deviance to the masses through pornography.
What does de-emancipation of the Jews involve?
This consists in depriving Jews of full citizenship rights and
of hemming them in with their former restrictions. It consists of
sanctions, of making things tough for the Jews — in short, of “keeping
them in their place” by denying them access to key professions.
Here is Eustace Mullins telling us how
Ezra Pound would have solved the Jewish problem if he had been given the
chance. What Pound is recommending is simply de-emancipation of the
Jews, or the demotion of Jews to second-class citizens with limited
rights. According to Pound, this was the technique the Byzantine Empire
had used for twelve centuries to keep the Jews under control. And it had
worked. So perhaps, as Mullins suggests, one should give it a try
again:
“The answer to
the Jewish problem is simple,” [Ezra Pound said, according to Mullins]
“Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.
There is no need
to kill the Jews. In fact, every pogrom in history has played into their
hands, and has in many instances been cleverly instigated by them.
Get the Jews out of banking and they cannot control the economic life of the community.
Get the Jews out of education and they cannot pervert the minds of the young to their subversive doctrines.
Get the Jews out of government and they cannot betray the nation.” (See here)
♣
And now the taboo topic of mass extermination, the most alarmingly anti-Semitic of the seven drastic solutions to the Jewish problem mentioned above.
A certain poster on the Darkmoon site,
mysteriously known as “SPQR”, would not have been satisfied with my
sober academic approach to the Jewish problem as outlined in Part 1 of
this essay. “The only solution to the Jewish problem,” he insisted
recently in one of his online comments, “is their wholesale extermination!”
Fearful of being branded
“exterminationists” by association, we wondered initially whether we
should delete this inflammatory comment. We decided to let it stand
because it seemed to us unworkable and bordering on the absurd.
“To beat the Jews
and free our lands,” this highly intelligent and articulate firebrand
continued, “we will have to become the most merciless and bloodthirsty
race the world has ever seen, because nothing less will stop them and
their black and brown foot soldiers — what they call “immigrants”. Make
no mistake, genocide IS THE ONLY ANSWER to the Jewish question! It’s not even a question anymore.”
For my part, I decided to maintain a
prudent silence. Naturally, I could not agree with this armchair
revolutionary that wiping out every single Jew in the world was a
good idea. Apart from being morally repugnant to most people, it was a
messy and impracticable scheme. In fact, it was physically impossible to
carry out.
Let’s assume for argument’s sake that
you are World Dictator and that you have decided to have a Jew-free
planet. So tell me: what exactly is your modus operandi?
How do you round upall the Jews
prior to their extermination? Do you draw up a list of individuals to
be exterminated? How do you know whose names to put on the list? Do you
concentrate your homicidal energies on the world’s 13.8 million full
Jews, or do you also go scalp hunting for the almost-Jews, half-Jews,
and quadroon-Jews? And how about the crypto-Jews? Do you start killing
people off because you suspect they might be Jews? What if the Jews decide to take the obvious step of going underground and pretending to be non-Jews?
How do you exterminate the Jews
if you don’t know who the Jews are?
“I want to exterminate the Jews!
Will all Jews please identify themselvesby putting up their hands.”— Imaginary Anti-Semitic World Dictator
That’s not going to work, is it?
♣
My Canadian correspondent John Lobro, a
retired mathematician and veteran political analyst, stops short of
extermination, but he too is convinced that only drastic remedies will
suffice to cure the age-old Jewish sickness. In a personal email to me,
he says:
“I am telling you
this privately: there can be no accommodation with the Jew without
making plenty clear to him that he is a powerless cockroach in face of
our overwhelming force and mastery.
Every ounce of
Jewish material wealth must be nationalized and Judaism permanently
banned on pain of capital punishment. Jewish meeting places (i.e., synagogues) must be demolished, this being the price for the physical continuation of the Jews.
Believe me, there
is simply no other way forward, these people are so evil and implacable
in their hatred of the goyim. Their burning wish is for our destruction
and enslavement. We need to fight fire with fire, not with brotherly
love.”
— Personal email, May 28, 2014 9:05 AM.
The confiscation of Jewish wealth and property
in nothing new.
It has been tried in the past on a number of occasions
without much success. Having had their property confiscated throughout
history, Jews have managed to devise various ingenious methods to foil
their oppressors and squirrel away their wealth in secret locations. The
richer the Jew, the more his wealth is likely to be safely hidden away
beyond the reach of vindictive confiscators.
Who knows where, in what subterranean
vaults and Aladdin’s caves crammed with gold bullion and precious gems
and priceless works of art, the fabulous wealth of the Rothschilds lies
hidden?
The easiest way to hide Jewish wealth in
a hostile, anti-Semitic environment is of course to cease to be openly
Jewish: to go underground by becoming a crypto-Jew, thus camouflaging
oneself within the surrounding gentile population.
♣
As for the quarantining or sequestration of Jews
in internment camps, this has as little chance of working as mass
extermination.
Jews are unlikely to volunteer for either option, and any
attempts to implement such drastic steps against them would result in
Israeli death squads wreaking bloody vengeance.
Now that the Jews have their own state, together with the Samson Option, pushing them around and devising schemes for their mass destruction is no longer advisable.
The same arguments apply to the other
draconian measures listed above. De-emancipation and the mass
sterilization of the Jews, accompanied by the immediate abolition of the
state of Israel without consultation with the Israelis, are not
measures likely to win the approval of those who possess over 300
nuclear warheads and have already threatened to blow up the world if
pushed too far.
“Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.” — Israeli general Moshe Dayan.
3. Anti-Semitism is increasing — why?
Before we leave this distasteful subject
behind, it would be only fair to point out that Jews themselves have
never been squeamish about mass extermination, provided it is non-Jews
who are being exterminated. It was essentially a Jewish regime in the
Soviet Union that between 1917 and 1953 managed to exterminate 66 million Russian Christians and destroy their churches. And indeed, the same genocidal policies by Jews are pursued today in Palestine against the Arabs.
It seems the Jews don’t like being
killed, but they don’t mind killing other people in vast numbers.
Provided they can get away with it and pin the blame on others. And so
the 3000-year-old Jewish problem still rankles remorselessly, like a
festering sore, with anti-Semitism as widespread and virulent as it ever
was.
In Germany, a country now completely
under the Jewish thumb, where a single whisper casting doubts on the
Holocaust will get the dissident historian hauled off to prison, one out
of four Germans (27%) are classified by the Anti-Defamation League
(ADL) as “anti-Semites”. In France, more than one out of three people
(37%) say they hate the Jews. In Greece, the figure is even more
alarming: roughly two out of three Greeks (69%) confess to harboring
anti-Semitic sentiments.
As for the Islamic world, it is here
that anti-Semitism is most deeply entrenched. In the Islamic crescent,
74% of the people hate the Jews. In Iraq, it is 92%. And in Gaza, 93%.
(See here)
“We will have to kill and kill and kill!” a psychotic Jew with crazy eyes intones. “All day, every day!”
With Jews like this around, is it any wonder that anti-Semitism is so prevalent?
4. What lies ahead?
These are the questions that ought to be
exercising every mind in America right now. They are questions of vital
importance on which the lives of our children will one day depend:
Is a new Red Terror on its way, courtesy of the neo-Bolshevik cabal that controls America?
Will history
repeat itself? Will the blood of Christians flow through the streets of
American cities, as it once flowed through the streets of Moscow and St
Petersburg when the Jews were in charge?
Will thousands of
Christian churches in America be reduced to rubble one day, as they
were in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik regime when Jews reached
the peak of their power?
Will Christian
nuns be raped and their breasts hacked off and red-hot pokers thrust up
their vaginas, as in the Soviet killing fields and torture chambers of
the twentieth century?
Will Christian
monks and priests have their eyes gouged out and be boiled alive in
cauldrons, as they once were in the Soviet Union when the Jews ran amok
under Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich and Ilya
Ehrenberg and Beria the serial killer who liked burying his child
victims in his basement?
We’ll have to wait and see.
______________________________________________________________
Dr Lasha Darkmoon is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Many of her articles have been published here and here; her poems and translations, here.
