The Jewish Question: A problem without a solution
Part 1: The Jewish Problem in Historical Perspective
“As far as I know, no one has ever come up with an effective solution to the Jewish problem. Solving the riddle of the Sphinx would be easier.”
1. Why all attempts to solve the Jewish Problem have failed
The Jewish Problem, more commonly and euphemistically known as the “Jewish Question“, has agitated the minds of political analysts throughout history but has remained unresolved to this day.
For centuries, a ready and makeshift solution to the problem consisted in the mass expulsion of the Jews.
Just get rid of the Jews, it was thought, and the problem would go away. This didn’t work. The Jews simply migrated and created problems elsewhere. And then, after a few years, their descendants came trickling back into the same countries from which their ancestors had been forcibly evicted.
Here is Queen Maria Theresa in a decree dated 1777, during the heyday of the Enlightenment period. The Queen of Austria-Hungary, Croatia, Bohemia, Mantua, Milan, Galicia, Parma and the Austrian Netherlands had grown weary of the Jews and the never-ending problems they had caused in her extensive dominions. Her expulsion order is typical of the many others issued by other countries before her time, so we shall quote the angry queen in her own words:
“Henceforth no Jew, no matter under what name, will be allowed to remain here without my written permission. I know of no other troublesome plague within the state than this race, which impoverished the people by their fraud, usury and money-lending and commits all deeds which an honorable man despises. Subsequently they have to be removed and excluded from here as much as possible.” (See here)
Though Jews have been expelled from 109 locations from AD 250, expulsion failed to solve the Jewish Problem.
The next attempted solution to the Jewish problem, primarily advocated by the Jews themselves and their philosemitic supporters, was complete emancipation of the Jews.
It was widely believed that if their crippling disabilities were removed, and if Jews were made equal citizens, that the Jewish problem would just “disappear” — especially with assimilation. The Jew’s antisocial behavior, it was argued, was the natural result of his unfair treatment. Treat him well and he would behave properly.
It was always understood that assimilation was a necessary precondition for Jewish emancipation. In order to become equal citizens, Jews had to promise to fit in with the society around them and become part of a happy and homogenous whole.
They were told: intermarry with the natives, convert to Christianity, learn the language of the country, dress like other people, adopt the manners and customs of those around you, and, above all, take a back seat and keep out of trouble.
It was a rare Jew who followed all these instructions to the letter. Some refused to follow any. As for the final injunction — take a back seat and keep out of trouble — most Jews found this impossible to keep. It ran against the grain of their nature. It was almost like expecting a cat not to kill birds or a fox not to raid the hen house.
The Jews received their first emancipation in France. This was in 1791 after the French Revolution, a catastrophic event engineered by Masonic secret societies in which the Jews featured predominantly and wielded the most influence. Several other revolutions were to follow in the nineteenth and early twentieth century. All of these, without exception, were masterminded by Jews.
“At the front of every one of these revolutionary movements for the destruction of authority, nationhood and religion,” noted an eminent elder statesman, “you find a Jew.”
These inflammatory words were written by Benjamin Disraeli, Prime Minister of England, himself a Jew who had converted to Christianity.
Emancipation proceeded at a rapid rate in country after country throughout the 19th century. Far from “solving” the Jewish problem, this merely made matters worse. This was because Jewish emancipation inevitably led to Jewish supremacy.
Every single country that emancipated its Jews was soon taken over by Jews.
In Russia, the Jews took their emancipation by force. This was in 1917 after the Bolshevik Revolution: an event carefully planned, financed, and largely administered by Jews from New York. Communism was then ushered in, the Pale of Settlement abolished, and Jews thereafter emigrated in swarms to the United States, Canada, South America, various other European countries, and, finally, to Palestine — where they immediately began to make themselves a thorough nuisance to the Arabs.
Did emancipating the Jews in Russia solve the Jewish problem? No, it did not. It made matters infinitely worse: not only in Russia but in every single country to which these refugees from the Pale of Settlement came with their beaky noses under black hats, their raggedy beards, their wild eyes, and their clackclacking Yiddisher tongues.
The Red Terror was soon to follow. The Russian peasants, who constituted 90 percent of the population at that time, were massacred in their millions, with Jewish commissars in the vanguard giving the orders to kill. Blood ran in rivers through the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg, much to the delight of psychopaths like Leon Trotsky, Lazar Kaganovich, and Ilya Ehrenberg — all of them Jews with lots of blood on their hands.
Over 66 million Russian Christians, according to Solzhenitsyn, were genocided by an essentially Jewish regime in the Soviet Union between 1917 and 1953. In comparison, the French Revolution had been a nun’s picnic.
Here is the psychopathic Leon Trotsky, shortly after the violent emancipation of Jews in Russia that followed in the wake of the Bolshevik Revolution (1917):
“We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible Eastern despots never dreamt of…. We shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison…. By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.” (Full quote here)
— From the ‘Memoirs of Aron Simanovich’, quoted in The Nature of Zionism by Vladimir Stepin, Moscow, 1993, and translated from Russian into English by Clive Lindhurst.
2. Zionism promoted as a solution to the Jewish Problem
A new “cure” for the Jewish problem was offered by Theodor Herzl in the late 1890s: Zionism. “Give us a country of our own,” the Zionists said in so many words, “and this will solve the Jewish problem.”
Quite simply, the idea was this: if Jews were given their own country, they would all go and live there and get out of everyone’s way. It was thought that the removal of their presence from every country, as they proceeded to settle in their new homeland, Israel, would solve the Jewish problem once and for all.The formula was axiomatic and self-evident: No Jews, no Jewish Problem.
Is it anti-Semitic to say this? No, it is not, given that the pioneers of Zionism put forward exactly the same idea in different words. They demanded a separate Jewish homeland for Jews on the grounds that Jews were a headstrong and highly-strung race incapable of living in other people’s countries without creating problems sooner or later. The Talmudic mentality insisted: we Jews will not take orders from our inferiors.
Israel’s first president, Chaim Weizmann, wrote in his memoirs:
“Whenever the quantity of Jews in any country reaches the saturation point, that country reacts against them. [This] reaction…cannot be looked upon as anti-Semitism in the ordinary or vulgar sense of that word; it is a universal social and economic concomitant of Jewish immigration, and we cannot shake it off. — Chaim Weizmann, Trial and Error (1949). Quoted in Albert S. Lindemann’s The Jew Accused, 1991 (p. 277).
Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, had himself made the same point much earlier. “Anti-Semitism,” he wrote, is “an understandable reaction to Jewish defects.” And in his diary he added: “I find the anti-Semites are fully within their rights.” (See here)
It has long been recognized by intelligent Jews that mutual antagonism between Jew and gentile is only to be expected, and that any attempt to achieve lasting peace and harmony between the two groups is doomed to failure. “I do not believe that the primal difference between gentile and Jew is reconcilable,” Jewish author Maurice Samuel points out in his book You Gentiles. “You and we may come to an understanding, never to a reconciliation. There will be irritation between us as long as we are in intimate contact.” (See here)
3. Why Zionism failed to solve the Jewish problem
Zionism seemed a neat solution to the Jewish problem initially. This was because, on the one hand, it meant that the Jews got their own country; and, on the other, it meant that non-Jews got rid of Jews and no longer had to put up with their pesky presence — which, as both Herzl and Weizmann had already conceded, was the root cause of anti-Semitism.
And so it came about that Zionism was widely seen in these early days as an original and workable solution to the Jewish problem, even though Zionism meant stealing Arab land on which to park this recalcitrant race of rootless cosmopolitans.
The awkward question nevertheless needs to be asked: did Zionism actually succeed in solving the Jewish problem, as it was widely expected to do? No, unfortunately it did not. Like all other solutions hitherto tried, Zionism was to prove an abysmal failure.
This was because Jewish leaders reneged on their implicit promise, or rather on the tacit understanding, that those who are given a homeland are under obligation to go and live there. The Jews were expected to emigrate to Israel en masse, thereby solving the Jewish Problem by removing the root cause of the problem, i.e., themselves: meaning, their presence in other people’s countries as undesirable maladapts.
The Jews’ reluctance to emigrate to Israel en masse after 1948 defeated the whole purpose of giving them their own country in the first place. It made a mockery of Zionism and its rationale.
There are almost as many Jews in North America today (5.8 million) as there are in Israel (5.9 million). An enormous 40 percent of world Jewry now choose to live in the United States. Vast numbers of Jews moreover continue to live in other people’s countries where they continue to excite anti-Semitism by their domineering presence, their over-representation in key professions, their tendency to network, and their constant involvement in fraud and financial scams.
This was not as it was meant to be. Why give the Jews a homeland if they refuse to live there? Why buy a man a horse, you might similarly ask, if he refuses to ride it?
So here we are now: at this awkward impasse.
By giving the Jews Israel, the Brits and the Americans possibly made history’s most costly mistake. No decision they could have made is likely to have more catastrophic consequences. The Jews now have nuclear weapons. More than once, they have threatened the world with their Samson Option, i.e., world annihilation if ever Israel is existentially threatened. And needless to say, they are currently engaged in the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians, a people whose only crime is that they happen to own the land the Jews covet.
Adolf Hitler once described America as the Jews’ “new hunting grounds”. I apologize for quoting the most hated man in history, but it seems there were times when Hitler actually hit the nail on the head. With remarkable prescience, he saw that the state of Israel would one day develop into organized Jewry’s international crime base from which it would plunder other countries, including America, with impunity:
“It doesn’t even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state in Palestine for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organization for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks.” — Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Chapter 11
THE THEFT OF PALESTINE
In 1946 the Jews owned 6 percent of Palestine.
Today they occupy (illegally) roughly 90 percent.
In his final years, Stalin appears to have developed a negative attitude toward Israel, seeing it as a giant military base run by a Jew-controlled America that would one day threaten the vital interests of the Soviet Union. Before he could do anything about it, Stalin was assassinated.
The one man who could have stopped international Jewry in its tracks, as it ran its rollercoaster ride to world domination with the United States as its battering ram, had been secretly poisoned to death — either by Beria, thought by many to be Jewish, or by another Jew in Stalin’s entourage.
The date of Stalin’s death, March 1, 1953, happened by a strange coincidence to fall on the Jewish feast of Purim.
International Jewry today continues its triumphant march in North America, Europe and elsewhere.======================
Part 2: Seven Drastic Remedies for the Jewish Problem
Francesco Hayez — The Fall of the Temple
“A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.” — Israel Shamir
1. What is good for the Jews is bad for everyone else
As things get better for the Jews, they get worse for everyone else — a pattern repeated in every single country where Jews have gained a foothold.
Take Germany, for example. Germany emancipated its Jews in 1871, making them equal citizens. By 1879, a mere eight years later, the Germans were complaining bitterly that they had been taken over by the Jews.
The very title of Wilhelm Marr’s 1879 treatise, The Victory of Judaism over Germanism, speaks volumes.
Listen to Marr’s passionate cri de coeur:
“[My words] must be understood as a “scream of pain” coming from the oppressed. Resigned pessimism flows from my pen. I shall announce, loudly and without any attempt at irony, that Judaism has triumphed on a worldwide historical basis…. I am sure that I have said what millions of Jews are quietly thinking. World power belongs to Jewry. The twilight of the gods has come upon us: you, the Jews, are the masters, and we are the slaves. What is there left to us? Let us accept the inescapable, since we can’t change it. Its name is: Finis Germaniae—THE END OF GERMANY!”
Today, white Americans are incomparably worse off than they were 50-60 years ago. Jews, on the other hand, are incomparably better off, owning a disproportionate amount of American wealth. Whether this is due to their own superior talents or to networking, banking and stock market manipulations, and financial scams à la Bernie Madoff, is another question.
Given that Jews make up 2 percent of the American population, the Forbes List of America’s 400 richest men ought properly to contain on it the names of eight Jews only. The last time we checked, there were 139 Jews ranked among America’s 400 richest men.
Most of America’s richest billionaires today are Jewish. Whites, Asians, Hispanics and Blacks are left far behind. (See graph)
The richer the Jews get, the more everyone else suffers, as Samuel Marr had argued as early as 1879 in the passage cited above. It’s the same in all other countries. There has been a massive transfer of wealth from non-Jewish into Jewish hands over the last 50 years.
According to Israel Shamir:
The Jewish universe is good for Jews. It is a curse for others. In the US, as Jewish influence has grown steadily since 1968, the lives of ordinary people have worsened. A good time for the Jews is not a good time for mankind. The blessing of the Jews is a curse for others. The regimes that are “good for Jews” are rarely good for anybody else.
The problem is compounded by the fact that right now elite international Jewry seems to have tightened its grip on North America and Europe to an unimaginable degree. The Jews call the shots everywhere in these increasingly “Jewified” continents, wielding disproportionate influence through their control of the media. They foment wars in foreign countries and sexual decadence wherever they manage to gain a foothold — as, for example, in Weimar Germany.
And then there’s the immigrant problem deliberately created by the Jews in order to weaken and destroy the White race — “the cancer of human history“, according to Jewish writer Susan Sontag.
Jews have been the ringleaders responsible for flooding the White man’s homelands with endless hordes of immigrants, creating in the process a multicultural menagerie which will eventually lead to the metamorphosis of Whites into “a mongrelized slave race of low-IQ, mud-colored runts.” (Anonymous correspondent, email).
Israel, however, remains resolutely mono-cultural and opposed to non-Jewish immigration, an apartheid society in which only Jews matter and where every other ethnic group is discriminated against and treated with barely disguised contempt.
There is an old Latin proverb that goes, Remedio amaro amaram bilem diluunt; literally, “With a bitter remedy they wash away the bitter bile.” Translated into elegant English, this gives us the wise adage: “Drastic remedies for drastic diseases.”
If we may venture to do so without giving offense, let’s now consider some drastic remedies for the Jewish problem.
2. Seven drastic remedies for the Jewish problem
Among the various remedial measures for tackling the Jewish problem, the following seven may be mentioned as the most drastic and extreme. I would like to make it clear that I am not myself recommending these seven measures en bloc. I am simply reporting the suggestions put forward by other people at various times:
(1) Mass extermination of the Jews.
(2) Quarantine or sequestration of Jews in separate secure locations.
(3) Mass sterilization of the Jews.
(4) Confiscation (or nationalization) of all Jewish assets and property.
(5) Emancipation of the media from Jewish monopoly control.
(6) The immediate abolition of the state of Israel and the restoration of Palestine to the Arabs, with full reparations.
(7) De-emancipation of Jews, i.e., the re-imposition of severe restrictions on Jews and their various fields of activity and areas of influence.
While all seven of these plans for dealing with the Jews can be described as “drastic”, some are more drastic than others. The solution calling for mass extermination is clearly the most drastic, closely followed by mass sterilization. Both these measures lead to the complete destruction of Jewry: one quickly and violently, the other slowly and gently. Both are genocide.
Quarantining of Jews, confiscation of their wealth, and the abolition of Israel are milder “solutions” to the Jewish problem because at least they allow the Jews to go on living, albeit with a severe curtailment of their liberties. Their ostensible aim is to put a stop to Jewish exploitation and criminality, and, above all, to prevent cultural contamination through the Jew-owned media.
It is inconceivable that the Jewish problem could ever be solved as long as Israel exists and as long as the mass media remains in Jewish hands. So these two preliminary steps are of paramount importance if the world is to be saved from Jewish encroachments: the abolition of Israel and the emancipation of the media from Jewish monopoly.
Finally, there is the de-emancipation of Jewry. This is the least draconian of the seven measures mentioned above: it not only allows the Jews to go on living, but it allows them to go on living in the midst of the gentiles. It is designed to ensure that Jewish influence is kept to a minimum. Jews are free to do what they want provided they keep out of public affairs and stop harming the surrounding non-Jewish population, e.g., by peddling sexual deviance to the masses through pornography.
What does de-emancipation of the Jews involve? This consists in depriving Jews of full citizenship rights and of hemming them in with their former restrictions. It consists of sanctions, of making things tough for the Jews — in short, of “keeping them in their place” by denying them access to key professions.
Here is Eustace Mullins telling us how Ezra Pound would have solved the Jewish problem if he had been given the chance. What Pound is recommending is simply de-emancipation of the Jews, or the demotion of Jews to second-class citizens with limited rights. According to Pound, this was the technique the Byzantine Empire had used for twelve centuries to keep the Jews under control. And it had worked. So perhaps, as Mullins suggests, one should give it a try again:
“The answer to the Jewish problem is simple,” [Ezra Pound said, according to Mullins] “Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government.
There is no need to kill the Jews. In fact, every pogrom in history has played into their hands, and has in many instances been cleverly instigated by them.
Get the Jews out of banking and they cannot control the economic life of the community.
Get the Jews out of education and they cannot pervert the minds of the young to their subversive doctrines.
Get the Jews out of government and they cannot betray the nation.” (See here)
And now the taboo topic of mass extermination, the most alarmingly anti-Semitic of the seven drastic solutions to the Jewish problem mentioned above.
A certain poster on the Darkmoon site, mysteriously known as “SPQR”, would not have been satisfied with my sober academic approach to the Jewish problem as outlined in Part 1 of this essay. “The only solution to the Jewish problem,” he insisted recently in one of his online comments, “is their wholesale extermination!”
Fearful of being branded “exterminationists” by association, we wondered initially whether we should delete this inflammatory comment. We decided to let it stand because it seemed to us unworkable and bordering on the absurd.
“To beat the Jews and free our lands,” this highly intelligent and articulate firebrand continued, “we will have to become the most merciless and bloodthirsty race the world has ever seen, because nothing less will stop them and their black and brown foot soldiers — what they call “immigrants”. Make no mistake, genocide IS THE ONLY ANSWER to the Jewish question! It’s not even a question anymore.”
For my part, I decided to maintain a prudent silence. Naturally, I could not agree with this armchair revolutionary that wiping out every single Jew in the world was a good idea. Apart from being morally repugnant to most people, it was a messy and impracticable scheme. In fact, it was physically impossible to carry out.
Let’s assume for argument’s sake that you are World Dictator and that you have decided to have a Jew-free planet. So tell me: what exactly is your modus operandi?
How do you round up all the Jews prior to their extermination? Do you draw up a list of individuals to be exterminated? How do you know whose names to put on the list? Do you concentrate your homicidal energies on the world’s 13.8 million full Jews, or do you also go scalp hunting for the almost-Jews, half-Jews, and quadroon-Jews? And how about the crypto-Jews? Do you start killing people off because you suspect they might be Jews? What if the Jews decide to take the obvious step of going underground and pretending to be non-Jews?
How do you exterminate the Jews
if you don’t know who the Jews are?
“I want to exterminate the Jews!That’s not going to work, is it?
Will all Jews please identify themselves by putting up their hands.” — Imaginary Anti-Semitic World Dictator
Will all Jews please identify themselves by putting up their hands.” — Imaginary Anti-Semitic World Dictator
My Canadian correspondent John Lobro, a retired mathematician and veteran political analyst, stops short of extermination, but he too is convinced that only drastic remedies will suffice to cure the age-old Jewish sickness. In a personal email to me, he says:
“I am telling you this privately: there can be no accommodation with the Jew without making plenty clear to him that he is a powerless cockroach in face of our overwhelming force and mastery.
Every ounce of Jewish material wealth must be nationalized and Judaism permanently banned on pain of capital punishment. Jewish meeting places (i.e., synagogues) must be demolished, this being the price for the physical continuation of the Jews.
Believe me, there is simply no other way forward, these people are so evil and implacable in their hatred of the goyim. Their burning wish is for our destruction and enslavement. We need to fight fire with fire, not with brotherly love.”
— Personal email, May 28, 2014 9:05 AM.
The confiscation of Jewish wealth and property in nothing new.
It has been tried in the past on a number of occasions without much success. Having had their property confiscated throughout history, Jews have managed to devise various ingenious methods to foil their oppressors and squirrel away their wealth in secret locations. The richer the Jew, the more his wealth is likely to be safely hidden away beyond the reach of vindictive confiscators.
Who knows where, in what subterranean vaults and Aladdin’s caves crammed with gold bullion and precious gems and priceless works of art, the fabulous wealth of the Rothschilds lies hidden?
The easiest way to hide Jewish wealth in a hostile, anti-Semitic environment is of course to cease to be openly Jewish: to go underground by becoming a crypto-Jew, thus camouflaging oneself within the surrounding gentile population.
As for the quarantining or sequestration of Jews in internment camps, this has as little chance of working as mass extermination.
Jews are unlikely to volunteer for either option, and any attempts to implement such drastic steps against them would result in Israeli death squads wreaking bloody vengeance.
Now that the Jews have their own state, together with the Samson Option, pushing them around and devising schemes for their mass destruction is no longer advisable.
The same arguments apply to the other draconian measures listed above. De-emancipation and the mass sterilization of the Jews, accompanied by the immediate abolition of the state of Israel without consultation with the Israelis, are not measures likely to win the approval of those who possess over 300 nuclear warheads and have already threatened to blow up the world if pushed too far.
“Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother.”
— Israeli general Moshe Dayan.
— Israeli general Moshe Dayan.
3. Anti-Semitism is increasing — why?
Before we leave this distasteful subject behind, it would be only fair to point out that Jews themselves have never been squeamish about mass extermination, provided it is non-Jews who are being exterminated. It was essentially a Jewish regime in the Soviet Union that between 1917 and 1953 managed to exterminate 66 million Russian Christians and destroy their churches. And indeed, the same genocidal policies by Jews are pursued today in Palestine against the Arabs.
It seems the Jews don’t like being killed, but they don’t mind killing other people in vast numbers. Provided they can get away with it and pin the blame on others. And so the 3000-year-old Jewish problem still rankles remorselessly, like a festering sore, with anti-Semitism as widespread and virulent as it ever was.
In Germany, a country now completely under the Jewish thumb, where a single whisper casting doubts on the Holocaust will get the dissident historian hauled off to prison, one out of four Germans (27%) are classified by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as “anti-Semites”. In France, more than one out of three people (37%) say they hate the Jews. In Greece, the figure is even more alarming: roughly two out of three Greeks (69%) confess to harboring anti-Semitic sentiments.
As for the Islamic world, it is here that anti-Semitism is most deeply entrenched. In the Islamic crescent, 74% of the people hate the Jews. In Iraq, it is 92%. And in Gaza, 93%. (See here)
“We will have to kill and kill and kill!” a psychotic Jew with crazy eyes intones. “All day, every day!”
With Jews like this around, is it any wonder that anti-Semitism is so prevalent?
4. What lies ahead?
These are the questions that ought to be exercising every mind in America right now. They are questions of vital importance on which the lives of our children will one day depend:
Is a new Red Terror on its way, courtesy of the neo-Bolshevik cabal that controls America?
Will history repeat itself? Will the blood of Christians flow through the streets of American cities, as it once flowed through the streets of Moscow and St Petersburg when the Jews were in charge?
Will thousands of Christian churches in America be reduced to rubble one day, as they were in the Soviet Union under the Bolshevik regime when Jews reached the peak of their power?
Will Christian nuns be raped and their breasts hacked off and red-hot pokers thrust up their vaginas, as in the Soviet killing fields and torture chambers of the twentieth century?
Will Christian monks and priests have their eyes gouged out and be boiled alive in cauldrons, as they once were in the Soviet Union when the Jews ran amok under Lenin and Trotsky and Stalin and Lazar Kaganovich and Ilya Ehrenberg and Beria the serial killer who liked burying his child victims in his basement?
Dr Lasha Darkmoon is an academic with higher degrees in Classics. She is also a poet and translator. Many of her articles have been published here and here; her poems and translations, here.