.

.
Library of Professor Richard A. Macksey in Baltimore

POSTS BY SUBJECT

Labels

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

911-The all-too-frequent-fliers of a planeless plan


Re: MEMORIAL SCAMS and Fake Friends of Invented Vicsims

Postby simonshack on November 16th, 2010, 11:34 pm
MISSING IN FICTION 
The all-too-frequent-fliers of a planeless plan 

by Simon Shack - August 2010

Image"So Real"

No planes crashed on 9/11. No hijackings took place and there were no hijackers. No planes also means that no passengers were flying inside them. No people flew to their death out of the empty WTC towers - since empty buildings do not contain people. Yet, we all fell for the computer imagery aired on TV. Planes? Fliers? No. The only real fliers of that day turned up elsewhere - in the tens of thousands - plastered on the walls of Manhattan.

On the evening of 9/11 all around “Ground Zero”, candle vigils were being held for the “thousands of casualties” while clusters of fliers appeared all over the city walls: xeroxed portraits of men and women with big “MISSING” headings. A typical flier would read: “MISSING: My husband John Brown, height (so and so) hair (so and so) eyes (so and so) and a contact number. Lower Manhattan was literally blanketed with those Xerox copies - an allegedly "spontaneous effort by family members to trace their lost loved ones". The world was left silently watching, sharing the human grief. This was no time to ponder over the possible purpose of those flimsy fliers pleading for help to recover lost loved ones - much as one might do for errant cats and dogs.

Image"Everybody Tells A Story"

Naturally, those intensely emotional hours allowed no space for rational - and much less - cynical thought. To most people, at the time, these fliers covering the city walls seemed like the most natural thing in the world. But this was civilized New York City - not some barren beachfront washed away by a tsunami. What sort of results were these fliers supposed to achieve? Were they the carriers of some desperate, irrational hope? Wait - perhaps a widow's expectation was to receive a call from some sharp-eyed NYC shopkeeper...“Hello ma’am, an errant gentleman that looks like your missing husband just walked into my grocery-store in a daze. He’s covered in dust and looks hungry. Come over and pick him up!“ 
So what was the deal with those fliers? What sort of collective phenomena would have caused hundreds of families to reach for downtown Manhattan, on the evening of the tragedy, to plaster the city with “MISSING” fliers? If we are to have a rational discourse about this matter, we must first tackle one basic, elementary question: is this what people usually do when buildings collapse ? or even in the aftermath of earthquakes or other calamities? No. It is something you might (possibly) do when a stray kid is feared abducted, kidnapped or on the run. Even in such circumstances, families will prefer to rely on the authorities - not on fliers. Such neighborhood pamphlets are usually reserved for pets gone astray. 

This issue merits serious consideration and needs to be resolved once and for all: we cannot keep on pretending that it was all part of the natural order of things. Let’s face it, the whole idea of these “MISSING” fliers is preposterous in the extreme. It was one thing to swallow the “spontaneous” nature of this bizarre, collective behavior in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. It is another to accept it as such today. So do we have any lead to follow as to finding out who might have been behind this manifestly staged operation?


Image "A New Comedy Series"

It would seem so. And - lo and behold! - it leads us straight to the website of Steven Rosenbaum - the boss of Camera Planet. It so happens that his friend and fellow 'curator' Louis Nevaer, apparently, saved 5200 of those fliers from destruction just in time before the rains set in a few days later. But before we get to know Dr. Nevaer, let me first remind you about Rosenbaum and his vast 9/11 video collection he purportedly acquired...by putting up fliers all around NYC... 
http://thecameraplanetarchive.magnify.net/

Image STEVEN ROSENBAUM (middle)

As the story goes, in the aftermath of 9/11, Rosenbaum put up posters and fliers in NYC and placed an ad in The Village Voice “urgently requesting images that captured the attack, its aftermath and the mood of the city”. That effort seems to have worked out nicely. His 1,700 video clips of 9/11 constitute, he says, “the largest archive of my now dormant television production company, CameraPlanet”. His website tells us that seventy-six people contributed to these “500 hours of videos”, which are owned by Mr. Rosenbaum and his wife, Pamela Yoder. Mr. Rosenbaum happily boasts that two appraisers have valued his archive in excess of $1 million. In fact, he explains, he is working out an agreement with Bank of America, the company's primary lender. He wants to structure a deal with a donor or a buyer that would keep the collection from being sold piecemeal, repay his company's debt of more than $500,000 and make the videos available to researchers, filmmakers and the public.

But Mr. Rosenbaum hastens to point out: "It's not about money. This collection is about five years of my life. We don't have the resources to make it available to researchers and other documentarians, and we are very selective in giving approval to use our video." Too bad. Mr. Rosenbaum apparently cares about documentarians and researchers; he just doesn’t have the “resources” to lend them his videos. What a crying shame. Inexplicably, his website mentions nothing about the history of the videos themselves. Not a single author of the 1,700 clips is cited anywhere. It appears that “the Best Documented Catastrophe in History” has a little problem; no one has a clue about who documented the unique, defining piece of history which Mr. Rosenbaum keeps in his custody.

We also learn from Mr. Rosenbaum’s website that his company, BNN TV, employs over 80 people and occupies five floors of a Fifth Avenue building in Manhattan. The proud slogan of his company is “BNN TV Changes the Way Stories Are Told”. His clients include CNN, CBS News, MSNBC, HBO and Court TV. His state-of-the-art video studio was among the first to adopt the advanced “Avid Media Composer nonlinear editing system”. Here’s an extract of Mr. Rosenbaum’s biography:

“Steve Rosenbaum is passionate about telling authentic visual stories. Raised in a family of storytellers (his mother was a writer; his uncle a White House correspondent), Rosenbaum was a filmmaker and magician before he began his career as an intern in an edit room at CBS News over 20 years ago. It was in this rarefied news environment that Rosenbaum discovered an unexpected gap between visual storytellers and the tools needed to produce a broadcast news story.”

ImageImage LOUIS NEVAER

But let's return to the "MISSING" fliers stuck all over Manhattan. Rosenbaum's Camera Planet website also mentions this different and curious 9/11 collection. Its curator, Dr. Nevaer, apparently collected 5,200 of those “MISSING” fliers which covered the walls of New York City in the aftermath of the disaster. He then neatly restored them, framed them and took them on tour ? an 18-month travelling exhibition around the world. Here is Dr. Nevaer’s story, as narrated on the Camera Planet website:

“Dr.Louis Nevaer is also seeking a home for his collection. He is curator of an archive that contains 5,200 missing-persons fliers and related artifacts from the days after the attack in Lower Manhattan. An exhibition derived from it, "Missing: Last Seen at the World Trade Center," travelled for 18 months to 17 American cities, to Mexico City and Milan."These fliers were going to be discarded as litter, and if we didn't save them, then they'd be lost," Dr. Nevaer said. The flier collection has been catalogued and stored in climate-controlled warehouses in New York and Miami, "and we're negotiating with several museums," he said."We won't permit it to go to any institution that charges admission," Dr. Nevaer said. That rules out the 9/11 National Memorial & Museum planned for ground zero.”

What Dr. Nevaer fails to tell us is that his “flier-tour” was prematurely cancelled, after being repeatedly slashed by critics for its tackiness and bad taste. Dr. Nevaer is apparently an expert on Hispanic immigration in the US - and is rumored to have been a CIA informer. It would seem like an odd, sentimental hobby for such a character to arrange exhibits of “climate-controlled” xerox copies... On the website listing the venues of Dr. Nevaer’s bizarre, travelling exhibition. we may read: 

The Fliers in New York For New Yorkers the fliers were a constant and powerful reminder of their lost neighbors. Although only 500-700 families could get to New York to create fliers, approximately 90,000 were hung. These fliers covered walls, lampposts, subway stops and phone booths all over the city. It was nearly impossible to go about life without encountering them.”


We can only marvel over Dr. Nevaer’s acuteness. Did he come to that “90,000” figure by estimating the city areas covered by the fliers? Did he ask each of the 700 families how many they had xeroxed? Did he stroll around Manhattan, counting them one by one? Or could he possibly have had any role in the gigantic "MISSING" fliers propaganda operation? In any case, the man who plausibly created the hypnotic 9/11 "amateur videos" and the man who plausibly directed the "MISSING" flier mass-hypnosis are no strangers to each other. 

ImageImage

9/11 was but a foul skullduggery played out by a gang of quack magicians with friends in - very - high places. The ploy was as vile as can be: to distort reality using the full clout of the mass media. It aimed to convey the perception of loss: the loss of planes, the loss of lives, the loss of freedoms. On LIVE TV, animated imagery replaced the real-life events of the morning; a handful of frames simulating a digital airplane exploding in a digital tower sufficed to convey 'the loss of planes'. The 'loss of lives' was stage-managed in the streets for public consumption - and the stage was Manhattan itself. Behind a smokey stage curtain, a redundant building complex was bombed to oblivion - and went missing in action. People and planes went missing on fliers: missing in fiction.

911-THE POSSIBILITY THAT NOBODY DIED ON 9/11


 The Possibility That Nobody Died on 9/11

Postby hoi.polloi on November 16th, 2010, 8:26 pm
.

AN INTRODUCTION TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT NOBODY DIED ON 9/11

Many places besides this forum are discussing the possibility that the victim numbers of the "al Qaeda" acts are greatly inflated (not to mention the numbers supposedly in any kind of organization the government refers to as "extremist Muslim terrorists"). The public response to the war on terror has been mildly successful for the war-mongers at best. Yet, there is enough padding given to them by obedient serfs that don't check the hand full of bullies making a killing off of killing people, to allow their illegal and evil wars to go through. In the public, civil liberties are continually advancing against the government's twisted idea of flourishing through bloodshed; increasingly, people are refusing to have the radiation-heavy full body scans at airports, including a pilot who became famous overnight for telling the groping inspector "if you touch my junk [genitalia], I'll have you arrested" and then being threatened unfairly with a government fine for refusing the private inspectors who never caught any fictional "al Qaeda" characters anyway. Bless that man for making a stand! We should all be doing the same when are given opportunities to make a peaceful statement for freedom. If we did, there would be even less reason than they say there is now for sending troops and bombs into foreign countries.

Forsooth, before it was accepted that there may have been no "passenger-filled airplanes" cruising smoothly into steel skyscrapers in 2001, many had already discussed the possibility that no such thing divebombed into the Pentagon or a Pennsylvania field, and rightly pointed out that there hasn't been any evidence for such things. The number of crying "family members" or grave-side photos or whatever else that was presented as evidence of deaths did nothing to sway such people from arguing with facts - there simply was not evidence of an airplane crash in either case - who were these "family members" and "friends" mourning? The possibility that these pictures were fake was left hanging in the air like an invisible monolith - and had to be squashed by the government to prevent their entire story from breaking down.

Alex Jones - who had been sent in to manage the public perception of the "Waco" incident - was called again to save the government's ass. The official government answer - you read me correctly, official government answer - to the "are all these pictures, public appearances and radio interviews fake?" question was answered when "alternative" theorists were sent in by the government to stop people from questioning whether their government had the power to control so much media. "Alternative" theorists included Michael Moore, Alex Jones and Dylan Avery and their mission was to give people a convoluted explanation for passengers (of the unproven airplanes) being landed elsewhere and killed. This is what caused people to explain it that way - despite all lack of evidence. At last they had relief from the possibility of total government control of the media - an excuse for the "family" and "friend" photos and media showcases shown as evidence of the government's stories of 3,000 American deaths to be somehow real. How Americans love to have their Hollywood-linked heartstrings pulled!

Still, the existence of airplanes was and is problematic, and became moreso as these "alternative" theorists softly herded people away from the possibility of fewer passenger deaths into the realm of accepting all four "crashed airplane" stories of 9/11 and finally into the completely herded and government controlled "Tea Party" created as a pro-oligarchy pro-plutocratic non-democratic Laissez-faire capitalistic extremist party that essentially created this whole "War/Security-Profiteers More Equal Than Others" problem in the first place.

Strangely, and we can only assume this is because of the power of imagery to control our perceptions, the people who remained unconvinced of the slime-licking Ron Paul-pumping Alex Jones and his pundit parade, and who remained steadfast on the fact that no planes ever crashed at the Pentagon or Shanksville, still believed that two passenger airplanes did crash into the World Trade Center in New York City - and that the dramatic lack of witness testimony - even compared to Pentagon or Shanksville - for such an event was somehow explicable because of lack of visibility for most people. Despite the suggestion that this would leave most people out of the "live witness" story and placed in the "television witness" story, they believed their own story-telling about "millions of eye-witnesses" somehow holding water. Millions of television watchers, radio listeners, "smells of death"-smellers(you ever been to New York? It smells of death pretty much 24/7) and running crowds does not millions of eye-witnesses make. Indeed, the entire elaborate stories people were inventing to coincide with their "witness to television" testimony smelled more of War of the Worlds confusion than a record of reality.

Consider too that the staged acts at Pentagon and Shanksville had more than a convincing number of witnesses of airplane strikes. They even had witnesses of bombers, UAVs and a host of other stories prepared to shield the original from outside doubt. It didn't make the airplane crashes there any more credible - in fact it lent weight to the desperation with which the government was treating the story - willing to employ the news media to constantly push it through invented testimony, plug it into any sort of common conspiracy theory that will grab people's attentions and hire experts to explain the "unlikely but true" physics. Yet, here, in the amazing case of New York City where millions of people live and more millions visit on a daily basis, with nothing but a few hundred people claiming to have seen something - and a something that doesn't even coincide with the official story - we are not to assume that the witnesses essentially serve as the government's method of sneaking in a "passenger airplane" through the vast unlikelihood of such an event going unnoticed by a city with millions of inhabitants?

Finally, when those who doubted the entire story, and increasingly witnessed the government's vast empire of media trumpeting nation-wide about an "evil Muslim" attack, asked questions about the corrupt business interests involved in the World Trade Center, and wondered whether anybody died there at all, the people who doubted two or four fake airplane crashes said, "STOP". That's too far. Let's just stop with two or four fake airplanes. Despite the complexity of media stories the government invented to try to "prove" the obviously fake airplane crashes of the Pentagon and Shanksville, despite the incredible gullibility of a city that found itself served a relatively negligible amount of witnesses endorsing even the idea of something colliding with one or more of the World Trade Center towers, when it comes to lying about the number of people in a closed, obsolete, redundant block of useless real estate who died during all the fictional "airplane crash" exercises, then it's simply going too far.

Think about it; the easiest number of deaths to fake, inflate or deflate at will, are the ones that simply must have been real?

There are no passenger load manifests for a building (and there weren't any for the four "airplanes" either but that's another incredibly ridiculous story), there is no government oversight of people exiting or entering a building using some kind of traceable paperwork. (And I personally don't think there needs to be though the security profiteers might disagree!) There could really have been any number of people physically inside the buildings from 0 to 20,000 or more.

Why have any?

If you are going to fake airplane crashes with fictional airplanes with doubtful tail numbers and insider-trading airline companies, if you are going to hire your emergency pundits Michael Moore and Alex Jones to admit where your vast story went wrong in several areas just to preserve the tiny bit of the story that most Americans believe and try to tow them back into line, if you are going to have an infamously wealthy series of contractors bidding on the buildings such as Peter Munk and Larry Silverstein, and your own cousin Marvin Bush owns the security company that walks freely around the entire complex - why would you have anybody die at all? You wouldn't. Especially if you could temporarily fake a certain number of deaths that might be slightly believable for the number of agents and media stories you have to produce to manage them as formerly existing personnages.

You don't have to keep them alive. You just have to keep their stories alive - and the entire war on terror is justified for the patriotic Americans who leaped into action to fend off the invading hoards of saber-rattling Muslims. (Even if Americans had to be the ones flying across an ocean and two seas just to invade the area of the "looming invaders").

The entire story is a sad joke that actually, thankfully, fewer Americans fell for than the government would have liked. Now let's make it clear to those who still endorse the government's errant secret dealings with Israel, Saudi Arabia, NGOs and black ops contractors that they were wrong about "3,000 American innocents killed" for whatever conspiracy theory reason purported by the media or its "alternative" ilk -- and move on, together, with the world, in apologizing to its citizenry for such bogus hokum being shoved down our throats to keep the war-profiteers in action.

911-Did Mr. Mike Benfante have a haircut on 9/11?


Did Mr. Mike Benfante have a haircut on 9/11?

Postby fakers911 on October 17th, 2010, 11:20 pm
Guys,

Check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuyQW_u1 ... r_embedded

and now check this one out (@0:30):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJO_7Ca6 ... re=related

His hair seems to be washed and cut nicely. He also seems to have got himself a new shoulder bag in the mean time... whaha..

His shirt looks cleaner too. :lol:

Edit: oh.. and what happend to the swelling on his head. It seems not to be there in the second video.

And what a coincedence that he managed to get interviewed twice amongst the thousands of people hanging around the towers.
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Postby nonhocapito on October 18th, 2010, 12:01 am
"Mike Benfante", another name+surname combination that returns only 9/11 related-pages on google: http://www.google.com/search?q="mike+benfante". 
As if these people wouldn't have had a shred of life in the past 9 years besides what happened on 9/11. Boy would that suck, to survive and have no life. Thank goodness they're all sims.

By the way, no chance Nina Pineda is anywhere but in a studio in the second video. And the first one, like many others, and unlike reality, really is just a "scene". With a beginning, a middle, and an end. Acting and camerawork visible throughout.
nonhocapito
Administrator
 
Posts: 1846
Joined: July 10th, 2010, 6:38 am
Location: Italy

Postby simonshack on October 18th, 2010, 12:43 am
OMG - Mike Benfante version 2010 ? :lol: :lol: :lol: 

Image

Well, at least they fixed his tie.
But he's got a real "funny slacker" walking by now... Ouch - those bloody renderings keep blooming at the edges. Do something, fix that software you fools!

Oh gosh - the 9/11 fakery crew really botched this new batch of crap - big time...
http://www.septemberclues.info
simonshack
Administrator
 
Posts: 3494
Joined: October 18th, 2009, 9:09 pm
Location: italy

Postby Maat on October 18th, 2010, 12:52 am
fakers911 4 Oct 17 2010, 04:20 PM wrote:Guys,

Check this out:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuyQW_u1 ... r_embedded

and now check this one out (@0:30):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJO_7Ca6 ... re=related

His hair seems to be washed and cut nicely. He also seems to have got himself a new shoulder bag in the mean time... whaha..

His shirt looks cleaner too. :lol:

Edit: oh.. and what happend to the swelling on his head. It seems not to be there in the second video.

And what a coincedence that he managed to get interviewed twice amongst the thousands of people hanging around the towers.


Good find there, fakers911!

Actually, it's the background rendering mistakes that stand out in this one (see ghostly building circled). The hair is really the same length, as curly hair appears shorter when dry:

Image

Then shows real length when wet ? but you're right about the 'bump' on his forehead disappearing:

Image
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." ? George Orwell
Maat
Moderator
 
Posts: 875
Joined: September 9th, 2010, 2:14 am

Postby fakers911 on October 18th, 2010, 9:32 am
You are right about the hair, though it seems that his hair got a little thinner over the years .. ;)

Anyway... Check this scene out:

Image

Straight out of Hollywood! Whahoo!

You should also check out his shoulder strap. He is missing the metal buckle in the Mike Benfante 1.0 version.

EDIT: The Verizon building is clearly visible. Now we need to find pre 9/11 pictures which where shot at the same location, to see if the building locations are not messed up aswell.
fakers911
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: September 29th, 2010, 7:55 pm

Re:

Postby Gary-Welz on December 10th, 2011, 7:21 pm
nonhocapito wrote:"Mike Benfante", another name+surname combination that returns only 9/11 related-pages on google: http://www.google.com/search?q="mike+benfante". 
As if these people wouldn't have had a shred of life in the past 9 years besides what happened on 9/11. Boy would that suck, to survive and have no life. Thank goodness they're all sims.

By the way, no chance Nina Pineda is anywhere but in a studio in the second video. And the first one, like many others, and unlike reality, really is just a "scene". With a beginning, a middle, and an end. Acting and camerawork visible throughout.


Michael Benfante is an actor/perp and not a sim...

 
full link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYA74Xx2YZI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYA74Xx2YZI

Book Description
Publication Date: August 11, 2011

Image

After nearly ten years of conflicted silence, a celebrated 9/11 survivor describes what it was like for him living with memories of 9/11 for the past decade.
On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, Michael Benfante went to work, just like he had day after day, at his office on eighty-first floor in the World Trade Center North Tower. Moments after the first plane struck, just twelve floors above him, Benfante organized his terrified employees, getting them out the office and moving down the stairwells. On his way down, he and another co-worker encountered a woman in a wheelchair on the sixty-eighth floor. Benfante, the woman and Benfante’s co-worker then embarked on a ninety-six-minute odyssey of escape—the two men carrying the woman down sixty-eight flights of stairs out of the North Tower and into an ambulance that rushed her to safety just minutes before the tower imploded.

A CBS video camera caught Benfante just as he got out the building, and almost immediately, the national media came calling. Benfante sat on the couch with Oprah Winfrey, where she hailed him as a hero. Almost one year to the day after 9/11, Benfante got married and the woman in the wheelchair sat in the front row.

That’s the storybook ending. But in the aftermath of 9/11, Benfante began a journey fraught with wrenching personal challenges of critical emotional and psychological depth in Reluctant Hero. Benfante shares the trappings of his public heroism, the loneliness of his private anguish, and the hope he finds for himself and for us. Because all of us—whether we were in the towers, in New York City, or someplace else—we are all 9/11 survivors. 16 black-and-white photographs

http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/1616082852/ref=sib_dp_kd/188-1277347-5023268#reader-link
Gary-Welz
Member
 
Posts: 102
Joined: January 10th, 2011, 1:21 am

Re:

Postby SmokingGunII on December 12th, 2011, 12:38 pm
fakers911 wrote:You are right about the hair, though it seems that his hair got a little thinner over the years .. ;)

Anyway... Check this scene out:

Image

Straight out of Hollywood! Whahoo!

You should also check out his shoulder strap. He is missing the metal buckle in the Mike Benfante 1.0 version.

EDIT: The Verizon building is clearly visible. Now we need to find pre 9/11 pictures which where shot at the same location, to see if the building locations are not messed up aswell.



Not sure how this thread escaped me, but I'm loving the Fire truck tyres in 2 feet of debris, whilst the car behind has its wheels completely visible! :lol:
SmokingGunII
Member
 
Posts: 495
Joined: October 23rd, 2009, 10:34 am

Re: Did Mr. Mike Benfante had a haircut on 9/11?

Postby HonestlyNow on December 12th, 2011, 2:43 pm
Not sure how this thread escaped me, but I'm loving the Fire truck tyres in 2 feet of debris, whilst the car behind has its wheels completely visible!


Image

It's a debris tsunami !
What's with that small person?
HonestlyNow
Member
 
Posts: 155
Joined: September 13th, 2011, 12:15 am

Re: Did Mr. Mike Benfante had a haircut on 9/11?

Postby pov603 on December 13th, 2011, 7:32 am
HonestlyNow wrote:
Not sure how this thread escaped me, but I'm loving the Fire truck tyres in 2 feet of debris, whilst the car behind has its wheels completely visible!


Image

It's a debris tsunami !
What's with that small person?


The fire truck may well be situated on a lower part of the area and the 'edge' we see obscuring the tyres is merely the raised part of the area.

The 'small person' may only be someone's coat on a bollard or some such obstacle.