Ian Fantom — March 25, 2020
The usually bustling streets of London. All but deserted during the ‘lockdown’. Click to enlarge
They used to call it ‘martial law’; now they call it ‘lock-down’.
They don’t need soldiers on the streets, but the effect is the same. Yet
within hours of my writing those introductory words, the mass media
were reporting that there were to be soldiers on the streets in the UK guarding hospitals. And a few days later, California was prepared for martial law.
And as I come to the end of this analysis, virtually the whole country
is under house arrest before the enabling legislation has gone through
Parliament. Much of the Western world is under house arrest, too. Why?
Bigger than Boris
Country after country is now succumbing. Whatever the cause, this is
happening in a world which has become more and more fearful over the
past two decades of just such a situation. The realisation that the
governments’ story on the 9/11 terrorist attacks could not possibly be
correct, eventually gave rise to the 9/11 truth movement. The scare
stories that followed 9/11, giving pretexts for wars and for draconian
powers by governments, together with attempts to silence those who were
raising serious questions, by name-calling, closing down meetings,
censuring their output, and targeting individuals, have widened the
scope of the 9/11 truth movement into a huge network of individuals and
small groups, sceptical of any scare story, and attempting to call
governments to account. Keep Talking is one such group, and has a key
position, in that it aims to keep the flag flying in London. At our
March meeting we discussed the CoronaVirus story as it had unfolded so
far, but we also discussed attempts to close down our meetings by a
fanatical Zionist group called ‘Hope not Hate’, which had been closing
down meetings by freethinkers of all sorts. Now they needn’t bother;
we’ve all been shut down.
This is the background situation in which the CoronaVirus story is
being spread. My own immediate reaction on hearing of CoronaVirus on
Channel 4 News was “I don’t know how much of this to believe”. The most
compelling reason to believe there was an emergency situation in Wuhan
was the images of people wearing masks in the street. We know from past
events that the mainstream media are quite capable of falsifying such
events by showing old video, or video from a different location. In any
case, we all know that Chinese cities are heavily polluted, and so there
was immediately a question in my mind of whether those videos were
genuine. It also struck me that of all places for a major epidemic to
break out with enormous economic implications this was happening in
Wuhan, the G5 centre in China. There had been an extremely strong
reaction from the US against Britain’s decision to install G5 technology
from China, for political purposes. A scare story was being put about
that Chinese technology could act as an espionage back door for the
Chinese government, as if Western governments couldn’t possibly apply
mass surveillance on their own people. No-one seemed to recognise that
mass surveillance by their own governments would be more dangerous than
if it were performed by the Chinese government. Whatever the medical
evidence relating to CoronaVirus, the political implications are huge.
I was in a discussion a few years ago with a colleague on how
tyrrany would come to the UK if it does. My own hypothesis was that a
charismatic politician would become Prime Minister, and charm the
country into abolishing elections. There were only three charismatic
politicians, and two of them preferred to put their principles on a
higher basis than any ambition to be in Parliament. The third one is now
Prime Minister, and he was the one I had in mind. However, Boris
Johnson had to decide which horse he would ride: the Queen’s horse or
the people’s horse. He chose the people’s horse, and now has to stick to
that. It still seems to me that his overriding ambition was to become
Prime Minister, but he now has to complete the course. I think it’s
encouraging that he has been in dispute with his Cabinet’s civil
servants. It means that he is trying to break free from their tyrannical
rule following a dismal period under Theresa May, who just seemed to be
acting as a puppet for her civil service Brexit advisors. I think, too,
that Boris Johnson understands the deep scepticism that would arise
from the people as regards motives, if he were to introduce draconian
measures before the people were really convinced of the need for them.
In any case, the CoronaVirus lockdown is much bigger than Boris Johnson.
The Banking Crisis
I’d just written the above subheading when I switched on RT’s Keiser Report,
and Max Keiser began by saying more-or-less what I was about to write,
but much more eloquently, more authoritatively and followed by much more
detail. His opening words were: “Hi, I’m Max Keiser. This is the Keiser
Report. The Pandemic edition. Special times require special reporting.
Of course, the Keiser report has been anticipating so much of what’s
going down around the world. It’s not a big surprise for those of you
who’ve been watching us for so many years”. It’s not just his followers
who were anticipating what is now happening. However, Max Keiser follows
the financial markets, and has been going into fantastic financial
detail week by week.
The economic crash was going to come about, irrespective of
CoronaVirus. He had said some time ago that the total amount of debt in
the world was more than could possibly be paid off, and sooner or later
there was going to be a crash. The general view amongst economists
seemed to be that this crash would be more devastating than the one of
2008. And of course there is a widespread view that the crash of 2008
was brought about intentionally by top bankers in order to consolidate
power. I first heard about that shortly before it happened from people
I’d never met before in Trafalgar Square during a demonstration. I was
at first incredulous, but then it happened, and I learned all about it
in 2010 from the film Inside Job.
Over the past few years I had been expecting them to hold off that
crash until they could blame it on Brexit, but the economic part of
Brexit hasn’t happened yet, and so another pretext would be required.
Debt would reduce the demand, and CoronaVirus will reduce the supply.
CoronaVirus would then trigger the economic crisis, rather than be the
cause.
Reduction in the price of oil by Saudi Arabia will put other oil
suppliers under strain, particularly Russia and the US. In the US the
fracking industry will find that its profits are less than the interest
it has to pay on its debts. In 2008 it was defaulting on mortgages that
brought the system down – inevitably, because there was widespread
loaning of money to house purchasers who would not be in a position ever
to pay the mortgages off. Now it looks like the collapse of the
fracking industry in the US. Max Keiser made a point that the total
amount of energy retrieved from fracking is less than the amount of
energy required to supply the gas. I have to wonder whether that was
foreseeable, too, right from the beginning, and whether, possibly, that
was the intention.
So are governments going to react as they did in 2008 by taking
money from the poor to give to the rich? Are they going to bail out the
central banks? It was a double whammy of course, because not only did
they bail the banks out, but they ended up borrowing from them and
paying off lots of debt. It may be that the British government by
exiting the EU has avoided paying its part in the bailing out of EU
banks, such as Deutsche Bank. But will they stand up to the big
international banks, as Iceland did
later that year? Or will the British government again invoke
anti-terrorism legislation? They did against Iceland, to the shock of
the Icelandic government, and that probably sealed the fate of the three
Icelandic banks that then collapsed.
The crazy banking system
It is now widely understood that the present system of central banks
in crazy. Why should private banks have the authorisation to create the
money supply out of nothing, and then charge even governments interest
on that money. Why can’t governments themselves be responsible for
regulating the money supply? Or perhaps Parliament? The Bank of England
was nominally nationalised after the war, but it’s so secretive that
that doesn’t mean much. I’ve been following an organisation called
Positive Money since just before it was created by Ben Dyson. Their
website home page states “Making money and banking work for society: We
campaign for a money and banking system that enables a fair, sustainable
and democratic economy”. They organised lectures throughout the country
and produced videos and other materials to educate the public on how
the banking system really works. I was impressed at their work over the
first few years. But one thing puzzled me: How did they manage to set up
a staffed office in the centre of London so quickly? I had to wonder
who was financing this. Eventually, Ben Dyson left Positive Money and
moved over to the Bank of England, and the circulars from Positive Money
changed their emphasis to campaigning for the climate change lobby.
This was crazy, because they were actually asking the Bank of England to
create more money out of thin air and give it to the climate change
lobby, an activity which would undermine what they were fundamentally
campaigning for. I wrote to them about this a couple of times, then
eventually made my point as comments under one of their web page stories. At least this brought about some fierce debate, even though the staff at Positive Money ignored the whole thing.
One of the others amongst the comment writers was – I hope – a
future speaker at Keep Talking, by the name of Justin Walker. He is
active with the New Chartist Movement, and he recently posted an article on the Bradbury Pound.
He explains: “In August 1914, at the outbreak of the First World War,
to avoid the imminent collapse of the private banks and the Bank of
England itself, Parliament passed a Bill through Parliament in two days
which authorised HM Treasury—not the Bank of England—to
create, issue and control money that was debt-free and interest-free
because it was based entirely on the wealth and potential of the British
nation. The high-street banks reopened within days …”. Justin wrote to
me: “This is extremely serious – please read and then make sure you send
out to as many people as possible this article I’ve just written
concerning the collapse of the global economy that appears to have just
started care of coronavirus. A proper debate about money creation must
now happen to prevent this ‘reset’ of the global economy that will
surely lead to the fascist Green New Deal and Agenda 2030 to ‘Save the
Earth’”. When I heard that Jeremy Corbyn had supported the Bradbury
Pound before becoming leader of the Labour Party I realised that his
support for the people of Palestine may not have been the only reason
for his being targeted by the Zionist lobby.
How much is true?
Confirmation from China of the CoronaVirus story suggested it was real. However, the use of facemasks in Chinese cities has been primarily to protect against particulate pollution
in the air. There is controversy in the UK over whether they play any
role in protecting against CoronaVirus. I understand that Chinese people are known for spitting in public.
It seems likely then that wearing face masks will reduce the pollution
breathed in, and thus reduce the spitting, and so reduce the
transmission of the virus. All that makes sense to me, but it wasn’t
explained when the videos of Chinese citizens wearing face masks were
shown on television.
Wuhan. Click to enlarge
I came across a video by Brasscheck,
in which the commentator described Wuhan as “the most polluted capital
in the most polluted country in the world”. He states that in 2012 the
US State Department was warning that pollution was so bad that
visibility was noticeably reduced, and you could smell burning, on a
daily basis. “In fact, you can see photographs of Wuhan with the streets
filled with people wearing masks, years before this virus appeared”, he
continued. This is exactly what I had suspected. “Tell me”, he asked,
“How is this not a relevant part of this story?”.
It’s not unreasonable to think that there was an outbreak of flu in
Wuhan, but were reports in the Western press exaggerated? A German
Pulmologist, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg,
believes it is, and he has explained this on his website. Under the tab
‘End Corona Panic’ he gives several links, and an embedded video, in
which he explains this (in German with English subtitles). He says that
every year we have new variations of viruses out of around 100 virus
types. He cites a study in Glasglow, in which they track viruses, and
report that around 7-15% are normally of the Corona type. Virologists in
Hunan identified a new variant of Coronavirus, and put it on a world
database, and virologists in Berlin worked on developing tests for it. A
test was submitted to the World Health Organisation by a Mr Drosten,
and it was accepted unusually quickly. It had undergone only an in-house
test at Charité (Universitätsmedizin Berlin), but because of the panic,
the WHO didn’t validate it. But such a test will not tell virologists
how dangerous the new strain is. That has to be done by epidemiologists
testing samples of the whole population, and looking at death rates.
Amongst those who die one would expect 7-10% to be tested positive for
CoronaVirus. So, he says, if you look at Italy, you have to ask where
and how have these few available tests been used. If that was only in
hospitals, then that would bias the statistics. Normally the death rate
from flu is about 0.1%. So now we have to see whether this number is
increased because of CoronaVirus. In previous years in Germany they
tested all hospital patients for CoronaVirus, but this year that hasn’t
happened. “Apparently it is the case that virologists have created
something very sensational here”, he says, “and with their creation they
really impressed the Chinese government as well. The Chinese government
made something really big of this. All of a sudden, face recognition
was installed everywhere at the airports, fever was being measured. The
clinical thermometer controlled the traffic on the Chinese streets”.
This led to a network of disinformation, making it very difficult for
critics to say, “Stop. There’s nothing wrong”.
Questionable testing
An article in Nature confirmed part of the story on the Drosten test:
“The lab of Christian Drosten, of the Institute of Virology, Charité
University Hospital, Berlin, along with academic collaborators in Europe
and Hong Kong, published details of a real-time PCR (RT-PCR) diagnostic
test and workflow on 23 January,
which detects SARS-CoV-2 and distinguishes it from SARS-CoV. The group
verified the test in the absence of SARS-CoV-2 isolates or patient
samples but confirmed its specificity against 297 clinical samples from
patients with various other respiratory infections. This formed the
basis of shipments of 250,000 kits, which the World Health Organization
(WHO) dispatched to 159 laboratories across the globe in recent weeks”.
I know through private correspondence that a Freedom of Information
Request was put by a James McComiskey to the National Virus Reference
Laboratory at University College Dublin on the testing for the virus. He
referred to three papers: ‘Isolation of a novel corona virus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia’, Ali Moh Zaki Md PhD et al, New England Journal of Medicine November 8 2012; ‘Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China’, Huang C et al., Lancet. 2020 Jan 24; ‘A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019’,
Zhu N et al., NEngl J Med. 2020 Jan 14. In none of these tests was the
virus purified, he says. “Thus, the three scientific papers cited above
do not prove the existence of the Novel Coronavirus”, he concludes. “I
am looking for a scientific paper, which demonstrates how the Novel
Coronavirus was purified? Surely, if the NVRL is able to detect the
Novel Coronavirus, it should also be able to demonstrate how it is
purified?”, he wrote. He also asked about the current situation. The
reply was a non-reply.
Politicians’ Statistics
One of our Keep Talking people, Mark Gobell, has been recording
reports of CoronaVirus deaths in the UK. His latest figure was 36 when The Sun announced it had jumped to 55, and reported that all victims were still being reported as having underlying health conditions.
Mark wrote: “It is becoming increasingly difficult to track the
announcements by each NHS trust for each day’s figures because : 1. Not
every NHS trust announces each of their deaths 2. At least one NHS trust
has deleted a URL for a previous death 3. Many NHS trusts are using the
same URL for subsequent days, thus overwriting previous announcements
4. Many deaths from previous days are being reported in the total for
the ‘current day’”. He says that the media are converting the carefully
worded NHS Trust announcements which at best are simply saying that a
patient tested positive and at worst are stated as being “Cornovirus
linked” into “died from coronavirus”. In fact, on 22 March, The Sun excelled itself
with a headline ‘TAKING ITS TOLL: Boy, 18, becomes UK’s youngest
coronavirus victim as UK death toll hits 281’, and then quoted the
hospital’s Chief Medical Officer as saying, “They had also tested for
COVID-19 on the day before they died but this was not linked to their
reason for dying”.
The Mail Online reports: ‘99% of patients killed by coronavirus in Italy had existing illnesses, new study finds’. Author Jon Rappaport describes a similar situation in the US.
The cause of death is not specified, he says, and someone comments,
“The one thing in all of this madness………..Not one person who has died,
has a name…….Who died????”.. So why are all the fit and well over 70s being told to stay at home? The investigative journalist and film-maker John Pilger is quoted in an RT article
as saying: “The Johnson govt is to launch a ‘wartime’ attack on
Britain’s elderly by forcing people over 70 into isolation for four
months. A 2012 study showed isolation killed the elderly. Having
destroyed state social care, extremist UK governments are now culling
the expendable. Fascism”. Indeed. The report is titled ‘Loneliness in Older Persons: A predictor of functional decline and death’.
Nick Kollerstrom found a Public Health England report ‘Surveillance of influenza and other respiratory viruses in the UK Winter 2018 to 2019’.
He wrote: “Tell me if I’ve got this right. Weekly flu-related deaths
winter over past five years is around ten thousand: Scroll down to
Figure 37, on page 51. Then Table 7 on the same page seems to show about
twenty thousand flu-related deaths a year, rather less. We’ve had say
55 CV-19 related deaths so far: That is somewhere around 0.2% of UK flu
deaths per season. Nobody is bothered about the flu deaths: just old
fogeys popping off etc. But now all UK schools are closing this week
until September, pubs are shutting down for a month etc. and we old
fogeys are told to stay at home, ‘self-isolate’”. I wrote back, “That
looks about right. If we integrate the deaths per week in Figure 37 do
we get to the figures in Table 7? … It may be that CV-19 is particularly
contageous but particularly benign. That would fit in with the Patent
of Bill and Melinda Gates (a weaker form of CoronaVirus)”.
The Patent
Yes, United States patent US 10,130,701 B2 on ‘CORONAVIRUS’ was
filed on July 23, 2015, and published on 20 November, 2018, by The
Pirbright Institute, in Woking, UK. The abstract states: “The present
invention provides a live, attenuated coronavirus … The coronavirus may
be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as
infectious bronchitis, in a subject”. So they’re not only proposing to
manufacture the stuff, but to vaccinate people with it, too!
This patent was discovered on 16 March, 2020, by a group calling themselves ‘Americans for Innovation’,
whose mission is to “fight abuse of the constitutional right for
authors and inventors to enjoy the fruits of their inventions, as a
matter of basic property rights and sound public policy”. They state:
“If we do not speak up, impeach derelict judges and imprison corrupt
attorneys, we cannot possibly hope to start fixing the current ills in
our society. Without justice and respect for private property, democracy
has no sure foundation”. Their discovery of the patent was announced on
16 March, 2020, when they stated: “This is one of the most important
posts we have ever released. In the last 48 hours—just as the
Coronavirus lock down was occurring in the US—researchers uncovered the
likely culprits behind the Coronavirus bioweapon”.
I see that in September 2007 the Pirbright Institute was implicated in an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Egham, ten miles away, according to a BBC report.
The same report states, “The Pirbright facility, near Guildford, is
shared by two occupants – the government’s Institute for Animal Health
(IAH) and Merial Animal Health”. Americans for Innovation state: “We
have shown that just a four-hour drive from Wuhan is Nanchang and the
Merial Animal Health Institute manufacturing vaccines for The Pirbright
Institute. The decision by The Pirbright Institute (Wellcome Trust) to
move their Merial Health vaccine manufacturing plant offsite was taken
after a virulent foot and mouth outbreak at their Merial plant”. So they
just transferred the problem from England to China!
The team at Americans For Innovation continued this research, discovering a network of companies and societies.
The Pirbright Institute takes its name from Baron Pirbright, who
purchased the land, having inherited the money in 1893. Today that land
houses Ministry of Defence facilities associated with British Defence
Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA), including The Pirbright
Institute, essentially controlled by the Wellcome Trust, and Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation – two key funders of the Pirbright Institute –
along with U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and
Cobbett Hill Earthstation, that are both adjacent to the Army Training
Centre – Pirbright land acquired by the Army in about 1875. Just south
of Pirbright is QinetiQ Group Plc, which, they found has a 20% holding
by The Crown, who also holds a ‘golden share’, which gives The Crown
effective control. QinetiQ brought together the various technical
projects.
However, ‘The Crown’, like many terms to do with the British
constitution, is ambiguous. It is generally understood to refer to the
Monarch, but constitutionally it refers to the committee of financiers that rules the City of London,
and The City of London is a sovereign state located in the heart of
greater London. The British Empire was an empire of Crown Colonies. I
think the United Kingdom still is.
It started with British Concentration Camps
“Lord Pirbright also bankrolled Henry Wellcome’s meteoric rise in
the pharmaceutical business as well as Sir Henry M. Stanley’s
expeditions to Africa to collect new cures and poisons for Henry
Wellcome, as well as secure west African mining rights for Belgium King
Leopold II, the British South Africa Company and his protégés Cecil
Rhodes, Alfred Milner, N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Winston Churchill and
John Buchan, among others”, the Americans For Innovation page states.
This brings me back to the beginning of my researches. I had been
pilloried by certain Establishment people for talking about the great
English journalist W T Stead, whose memory I was attempting to revive as
the most influential figure promoting Esperanto at the beginning of the
movement in the UK. I couldn’t understand why, until I found that he
had been conned by Cecil Rhodes into recruiting influential people to
his secret society, under the illusion that the purpose was to bring
‘home rule’ to the countries of the Empire, and so contribute to world
peace. Eventually Stead told Cecil Rhodes face-to-face that he should
have been sent to prison for his role in the Jameson raid, a false-flag
attack on the Boers, designed to set off the Second Boer War. When
Rhodes died, Stead was still beguiled by “the magnetism of his
personality”. Stead led the ‘Stop the War’ movement, as well as
foreseeing the cause of the Great War. Stead died with the sinking of
the Titanic, together with Lord Astor and other opponents of the
establishment of the Federal Reserve, which was established the
following year. The Americans For Innovation page states: “Rhodes
established The Round Table to promote this ‘English-speaking’ hegemony
over the the world”. I know that Stead even reported Rhodes as talking
about “the English-speaking race”. Stead had to be silenced, and
airbrushed out of history.
The Americans For Innoviation account is detailed, and probably
hastily written, since they were trying to get this information out as
quickly as possible, but they have downloaded and archived many
documents to back up their claims. A more easily digested video appears
on that page (Bookmark: #coronavirus-bioweapon), in which Douglas
Gabriel and Michael McKibben discuss their findings.
They found that Lord Pirbright and Cecil Rhodes were in the Privy
Council, advising the Queen, though they kept quiet on this. “And in
those meetings one of the things they did is they cleared the way for
the establishment of the British South Africa Company to be a privately
run operation that would manage the colony in South Africa”, stated
Michael McKibben. He went on to say that Pirbright was funding Wellcome
“to look for new poisons and viruses and cures in the African ‘dark
continent’, as the propaganda called it, and that they were helping each
other to extend this plan to dominate not only the pharmaceutical
business but the propaganda business, but they used propaganda to create
these fanciful stories about these English explorers who went about
these deep dark places, who supposedly were civilising the natives, but
as you say I think the real agenda was they were observing how these
viruses and vaccines worked on different population types, and they were
specifically at that time looking to depopulate the areas of the world
that they wanted to dominate in the mining area”.
“So here we have Henry Rothschild de Worms devising the strategy for
the Boer War … – we know there was a concentration camp. Over 60 000
people were killed. They were experimented on with vaccines from
Wellcome, and that it was Henry de Worms [Lord Pirbright] who conceived
of this”, he said.
Predictive Programming?
From the above, whatever the origin of the Covid-19 virus, there is
clearly a strong case that the Western mainstream media have been
exploiting the situation, causing widespread fear, and even panic,
amongst the populations, and that governments are now bringing in
martial law and planning to employ the military to control whole
populations. We also know that a great deal of planning has gone into
reacting to such an eventuality.
On October 18, 2019, six weeks before the epidemic in Wuhan was
being reported, there was a simulation of just such an event by the
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Center for Health Security, the World Economic
Forum, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and funded by the Open Philanthropy Project,
an organisation whose main funders include a co-founder of Facebook.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Center for Health Security was founded in 1998
“as the first nongovernment organization to study the vulnerability of
the US civilian population to biological weapons and how to prevent,
prepare, and respond to their consequences”. So immediately we are into
the area of biological weapons.
They called the simulation exercise ‘Event 201’,
and they published three hours of videos recording the exercise, with a
twelve minute selection of highlights. They specifically talk about a
variant of CoronaVirus. Much of their concern is about misinformation
and disinformation, and they say that such a pandemic could result in a
distrust of news sources. I have to wonder why.
An announcer states: “Global health experts have highlighted that
dis- and mis-information are wreaking havoc on the CAPS response. Health
workers are under attack on a number of locations due to rumours that
they are purposely spreading this disease. And response efforts in many
places have had to be suspended because of concerns around violence.
Pharmaceutical companies are being accused of introducing the CAPS virus
so that they can make money on drugs and vaccines, and have seen public
faith in their products plummet”. She says that false news is rising,
and levels of trust falling, and that people stop co-operating. “Some
governments have taken control of national access to the Internet.
Others are censoring websites and social media content, and a small
number have shut down Internet access completely to prevent the spread
of misinformation. Penalties have been put in place for spreading
harmful falsehoods, including arrests”, she says.
Spiro Skouras comments: “As you can see, the subject of dominating
and control of information is a top priority. While I understand that
fake news is and can be very dangerous and damaging, we must keep in
mind that governments and the media have an extensive track record of
dishonesty in selling outright lies to the public all of the time. Now
in this simulation the Pandemic Emergency Board goes on to decide that a
centralised source of information, led by the World Health
Organisation, which falls under the United Nations, is the only way they
can ensure that they can control information in order to combat fake
news, misinformation and disinformation”. That means, he says, that
reports that counter the official story are possible, and showing a
Daily Mail article, which states, “Scientists warned in 2017 that a SARS-like virus could escape a lab set up that year in Wuhan, China, to study some of the most dangerous pathogens in the world”.
I find it interesting that they should be advocating censuring such
reports, rather than advocating complete openness, in order to bring
people along with them.
The Crown, the Bank Sharks, and then a Jubilee Year
The relative proximity of the biolab to Wuhan may be one of the
reasons that the outbreak would happen in Wuhan, but considering that
some of the people involved in the simulation were experts in biological
warfare, it may be that Wuhan was selected because of the enormous
opposition to Boris Johnson’s decision to acquire 5G technology in the
UK from Huawei, in Wuhan. The Chinese, on seeing cases of a new strain
of CoronaVirus in Wuhan will have been aware of the simulation exercise,
because they were part of it. Possibly they latched on at that point,
realising that this could be a biological weapon attack, and so reacted
with the measures they had been preprogrammed with. The West then
reacted with fake news and exaggeration, and doing everything that they
are now accusing the Chinese of doing.
It’s a little disheartening to see how the public has, over a period
of a few weeks, gone from believing that politicians tell lies, to
believing everything they’re being told. I think that in the UK you
can’t get very far in politics unless you do tell lies. There are too
many taboos, and they all seem to relate in some way or other to the
interests of The Crown. I think it would be fair to paraphrase the
British attitude as: “I know the government tells lies, but I’d rather
believe their lies than live in a country where they kill their own
people, throw babies out of incubators and support religious groups
founded by terrorists”.
I think it’s clear that the UK is a Crown colony, and that The Crown
is up to its old tricks. After Brexit, perhaps the UK should declare
independence from The Crown, or better still, for The City to go into
self-isolation. To keep out of a catastrophic debt situation something
like the Bradbury pound would have to be introduced. But in the meantime
we need to do what the ancients did from time to time. Every Jubilee
Year they would cancel all debts. Economist Michael Hudson wrote a book
called ‘… and forgive them their debts’.
That’s what Jesus’s mission was about. ‘Sin’ to their thinking was a
debt to society, but they were also talking about monetary debt. Under
Roman rule a “den of thieves” was built on Mount Zion, in the guise of a
temple, and Jesus was tortured and executed for storming it and
overturning the tables. Zionism is the continued exploitation of the
people by the loan sharks. It is not a Jewish philosophy, but one that
exploits the Jews. It
was popularised by a Catholic, born and bred, whose only claims to
being Jewish were that his mother was an assimilated Jew, and that he
had a crooked nose, which he didn’t. He proposed the “final
solution to the Jewish question”, proposing that the Czar and the Kaiser
round up the Jews and send them to Palestine.
The Bolshevik revolution was funded by the US bank Loeb & Co,
and it exploited the widespread fear in the Jewish community brought
about by the pogroms. “We now know, quite clearly, that those
responsible are a gang of despicable thugs, who, by diverse and most
dishonorable means, with widely put about lies and calumnies, have
artfully created terrible hate between some ethic groups and others”, stated one contemporary peace campaigner in 1906.
Over recent years there has been a campaign by fanatical Zionist groups
to put fear of ‘antisemitism’ into the hearts of the Jewish communities
in the UK and some other countries, and intimidating non-Jews into
closing down meetings. Now all meetings are being closed down, based on
the fear that we’re all going to die because of a deadly epidemic, which
is ravaging the world’s population. Now the ‘den of thieves’ is
intimidating whole populations in yet another power grab.
So after the CoronaVirus scare is over, we should have a Jubilee
Year, and declare all debts cancelled. Perhaps nowadays we can be fairer
than the ancients were, in applying debt cancellation to all debts to
institutions which have the power to create money out of absolutely
nothing.
Acknowledgements
Many of these links were brought to my attention by people in the
Keep Talking network. In the early stages I was preoccupied with a
further assault on our group from Hope not Hate (“ ‘HATE’ for short”, as
I described it), whilst others were working on CoronaVirus. The first
half of our meeting in London of 5 March was dedicated to HATE, and I
talked about two letters I had just drafted to invite them and David
Cameron to come to talk to us about why they wanted to close us down.
The second half was a discussion on CoronaVirus, which kicked off
further email discussion. I was puzzled why HATE had not shut us down on
this occasion. Now, of course, all groups are shut down, and I suspect
that HATE’s handlers may have had foreknowledge of this and told them
not to bother following up their offensive by closing our March meeting
down, since we’d be closed down anyway. Since completing this article Peter Hitchins of the Daily Mail has spoken out, and so have twelve medical experts.
