More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC
By The Anonymous PhysicistSgt. Matthew Tartaglia, a WTC responder, rescue worker, counselor, and FEMA consultant
has made many remarkable statements related to the nuking of the WTC, and its China Syndrome aftermath. Tartaglia,
said he believes “tactical nukes” took down the towers, and was
responsible for the high temperatures weeks and months later (but does
not know of the existence of the China Syndrome.) His statements include
these: “…There were only certain parts of the site that you could not
legally leave without going through decontamination.…They would tackle
you and take your camera away. I watched people be tackled.” Most
responders couldn’t go “down in the garages…The rescue people – when our
clothes got so contaminated, we were told not to bring our clothes off
that site. Don’t wear anything on the site you’re not prepared to leave
there because it’s contaminated.” Note that “discarding clothing”, and
“going through decontamination” are standard nuclear industry methods of
dealing with radiation-exposed individuals. I do not know if other
industries necessitate the use of these methods as well.
In 2005,
Sgt. Tartaglia said, “My teeth are falling out.” Like hanging skin
resulting from a nuclear bomb, teeth falling out is a common symptom,
months or years later, from nuclear radiation exposure. (Other factors
can also possibly cause this, but are less likely.) Read about
this Army veteran sent to Hiroshima, just days after it was nuked, to bulldoze roads.
This was apparently much too soon to send Americans in to Hiroshima,
but the PTB apparently cared as much about Americans, as they did about
the Japanese women and children who were nuked. I note that after the
July 16, 1945 Trinity “A-Bomb” test,
Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer and General Leslie Groves did not return to Ground Zero until five weeks later on Sept 11, 1945.
Yes, there is 9/11 again. So man did not walk again on the first
alleged Ground Zero which resulted from the “Manhattan Project” until
9/11/45. Also read
here
about 3 veterans of atomic bomb tests in Nevada in the 1950’s who had
their teeth fall out within a few years of their radiation exposure. [To
quickly find the 3 veterans cited, search on “teeth.”] That article
also indicates that the gov’t lied to them as to the amount of radiation
they had received. It is excerpted from the book, “They Never Knew: The
Victims of Atomic Testing”, [not read here] by Glenn Alan Cheney. See
also “The Plutonium Files” by Welsome, and the two books on the “Making
of the A-Bomb”, and the H-Bomb, “Dark Sun”, both by Rhodes--all three
read here.
But please read
this
(portions of the book, They Never Knew) in its entirety. It includes
the following remarkable quote that may be very relevant to 9/11
research. A whistleblower came forward decades later about the actual
radiation exposure Army personnel were subjected to. “In 1982, a former
Army medic, Van R. Brandon, admitted that he had been ordered to keep
two sets of books. "One set was to show that no one received an exposure
above the approved dosimeter reading," he said. "The other set of books
was to show what the actual reading was. That set of books was brought
in a locked briefcase attached to [an officer]'s wrist by a set of
handcuffs every morning." Army personnel were denied medical benefits
and disability because the regime publicly used the “cooked” book. Do
you think this same govt has gotten more or less evil, corrupt, and
duplicitous, in the ensuing decades--and in a matter that relates to
possibly irradiating tens of thousands of WTC workers, responders, and
near-by residents.
The
statements made by Mike Pecoraro,
a WTC1 stationary engineer, and 9/11 survivor, are also remarkable.
Pecoraro first knew something was wrong after observing flickering
lights (EMP?), and then he ascended to the sub-basement C level, from
below. He says, "There was nothing there but rubble, we're talking about
a 50 ton hydraulic press gone!" Pecoraro and a co-worker “made their
way to the parking garage, but found that it, too, was gone”… As they
ascended to the B Level, one floor above, they “were astonished to see a
steel and concrete fire door that weighed about 300 pounds, wrinkled up
like a piece of aluminum foil" and lying on the floor. Now I assert
that this too is a likely sign that a nuclear bomb went off. Perhaps
only the multi-million degree temperature at the hypocenter, or neutron
bombardment, is capable of doing that to that heavy steel door. The
article continues: “"They got us again,"” Mike told his co-worker,
referring to the terrorist attack at the center in 1993. Having been
through that bombing, Mike recalled seeing similar things happen to the
building's structure.” This last statement from Pecoraro, I assert may
be corroboration of nuclear engineer/geologist Phil Schneider’s
statement that his inspection of the 1993 WTC explosion damage revealed
to him that it was a nuclear blast, that may have gone awry, that is,
was insufficient. (See my previous articles at
wtcdemolition.blogspot.com.) Pecoraro states that as WTC2 “collapsed,”
“there was a wind that came through the revolving doors that blew me [in
the WTC1 lobby area] 100 feet to the far wall” Was this a nuclear
pressure blast? You’ve probably seen the videos of A-bomb test sites,
and resultant winds blowing down model houses, and heat causing fires.
Like
this and
this.
More
evidence of the likely nuking of the WTC, and China Syndrome aftermath,
comes from no less than CNN’s Larry King Show. This show aired on
10/6/01, and was taped at the WTC, and a nearby burn unit, in the days
prior to the air-date. The transcript is
here.
Regarding
the likely China Syndrome of high heat three weeks later, Thomas Von
Essen, NYC Fire Commissioner, says, at the WTC, “…it's so hot, it's a
really hot fire. The steel has been hot for three weeks now. Tremendous
heat below, you know. It's -- the fire is not out down below.” From my
earlier articles, you know that this went on for at least six months
after 9/11.
At the Weill Burn Center at the Cornell Medical
Hospital, Larry King interviews two women who received burns—without any
fire--while trying to flee WTC1.
King: “So, did you know you were on fire, in a sense?”
Yang: “No, I wasn't on fire, I think it was from the heat.“
Mary Jo: “That's what we were told, it was the heat.”
So
like Felipe David, like the Hiroshima survivors, these two women have
no clue as to why their skin was burned. And who told them “it was from
the heat”? And if it was the doctors, who told them to say this to the
patients? Note that King says “…fire in a sense.” I assert that that
sense is not fire per se, but bombardment by radiation (thermal rays,
gamma rays, neutrons) that can cause heat at the skin, and damage the
skin--if the flux is large enough (relevant parameters include distance,
shielding, intensity and type of radiation).
King also
interviews burn victim Brian Reeves, a security guard starting his
rounds in the lobby of one of the towers. Reeves says: “I don't know
when I got burned, but I just know when it knocked me over, there was --
there was something, the windows blew out. And when the windows blew
out, I was on the ground, and like I said, there was a gust of wind. And
when I opened my eyes, I seen a bright orange light.” Reeves, feeling
heat on his back, takes his jacket off and falls on the ground while
fleeing. There is the issue of whether his jacket is on fire or not.
[Months later, the media would morph the “bright orange light” into
“fireball.”] We must ask, did Reeves see the flash of, and receive the
radiation, and air pressure blast from, a mini-nuke? Like the Hiroshima
victims, he knows there had to be “something” but he/they didn’t see
what burned him/them. In
this video,
months after 9/11, Reeves then says “the fire was this close to my
face” (and holds his hand near his face). He did not say any such thing
2-3 weeks after 9/11, when interviewed by King.
Getting back to
the King show, Dr. Roger Yurt of the Weill Burn Center says, “[Reeve’s]
worst burns were on his back, some burns up on his head. Burns on your
arms also.” My possible interpretation is the following. Likely his
jacket was not on fire (note the burns on his head), and the jacket
likely shielded him from receiving even more radiation! The source of
which was apparently behind him, as his burns were mostly on his back,
but also on his head. But if the flux of radiation is high enough, a
person and/or their clothes will catch fire from the radiation. Many
Hiroshima victims were immediately killed and left in a charred state.
The “bright orange flash” he “saw” may well have been a flux of
radiation onto his retina. This kind of thing is again known from Army
veterans of the nuclear blasts in Nevada in the 1950’s. In the worst
cases, numerous Army personnel were forced to be, in ditches, only a
football field away from an atomic bomb going off!
But when Brian
tells his story months later, the reporter adds “fireball” several
times in her telling the story. Even the direction of the alleged
fireball is cleverly, and falsely, inserted: “… a fireball that roared
down the elevator shaft.” In actuality, from numerous lobby, and
sub-basement witnesses, a non-fireball, a likely nuclear detonation,
occurred below the lobby, and its effects traveled UP a few floors—and
not down some 80-90 floors from the likely conventional explosion above.
In any case, Reeves did not observe what may, or may not, have been
traversing the elevator shaft. It appears that in the telling of the
9/11 survivors’ accounts, the MSM, and the 911 pseudo-truth media, are
doing everything they can to add “fire” and “fireball” to the later
retelling of numerous survivors’ tales. And these survivors, who did not
report “fire” initially, and not knowing about such things as
radiation-induced burns—without any fire—may later start including this
in their own accounts, after doctors, or reporters, or hidden (or not so
hidden) handlers either keep repeating the “fire” and “fireball” memes
to them; or perhaps in some cases threatening/rewarding the survivors to
start telling it the way their handlers demand. Never forget how FBI,
or secret service agents, both on the scene in Dallas and later during
depositions, threatened eyewitnesses to President Kennedy’s
assassination, if they either
said they clearly saw the Secret Service driver do it,
or that there also were shots from the grassy knoll. Experts in
eyewitness testimony tell us that the most accurate account is the
closest in time to the event.
Remember how sub-basement, 9/11
burn victim Felipe David’s own accounting never mentions “fire” or
“fireball,” but his alleged rescuer,
William Rodriquez added fire or fireball to his accounting of David’s experiences.
You will have to be the judge after reading survivors’ accounts shortly
after the event, and then months later after media/(govt?) interviews.
This is a crucial point in the likely tampering of witnesses to a
heinous crime. It is particularly odious as this may be ongoing from
deep-cover intel assets in the major, AND internet “truth”, media. But
if the government/media had nothing to fear, or cover-up, why do they
have to change so many burn victims’ testimonies? Likewise they are
frequently inserting “plane hits” into statements, when the witness
couldn’t possibly have seen that, even if the plane hits were real,
instead of CGI.
I believe we are only scratching the surface
regarding evidence of the use of mini-nukes on 9/11. Many fire and
police witnesses fear losing their jobs, or their pensions. Beginning a
month after 9/11, NYC Fire Commissioner von Essen’s office took
depositions of 503 fire personnel, port authority police and EMT first
responders. The report is 12,000 pages long and rarely read [and not
read here].
It was deliberately excluded from the 911 Commission, and NIST, reports (scroll down at link).
Could they be hiding evidence, not of the widely known
explosions/controlled demolition, but specifically of the nuking of the
towers and 3000 people? After von Essen’s 503 witness interviews, former
CIA director Robert Woolsey, was inserted into this in 2002, as the NYC
Fire Department's “Anti-terrorism Consultant.” (It’s interesting that
Wikipedia omits this job in his bio.) He issued a gag order, under
threat of job loss and worse, down the ranks, under the guise of
“anti-terrorism.” This report is the one that includes EMT, Patricia
Ondrovic’ [See my articles on her
here]
heavily redacted, but remarkable interview. Recall my analysis
demonstrated she witnessed Electromagnetic Pulse from a nuclear bomb
causing flickering lights and making cars catch fire, for no apparent
reason (“toasted cars”), right near her, and also jets shooting down
other jets in the sky over the Hudson. Was Woolsey in charge of the
redacting, of her, and other, testimony? I make the assertion that the
very purpose of interviewing these 503 9/11 witnesses and responders was
to find out who had witnessed evidence of the nuking of the WTC, and to
then threaten, and silence them! Perhaps too many to kill, so first try
to silence them!
Here are the full 503 interviews.
It would be good if some real 911 researcher could read them all or
search for when portions are redacted. Note my scanning them indicates
that numerous witnesses report “explosions;” this was not reason enough
for redaction!
There is other eyewitness (or should I say
skinwitness) evidence, I believe of the heat, and radiation, wave which
emanates outwards from a nuclear blast from numerous people who happened
to be in the vicinity of the towers.
This article
states that “John Axisa, who was getting off a commuter train to the
World Trade Center, …[after the alleged first plane hit]… Then there was
a second explosion, and he felt heat on the back of [his] neck.” Note
the timing of the “second” explosion he heard--nothing from which was
seen exiting the building--and yet he felt the heat at that exact time!
This again could only be from a nuke, I assert. (The DEW hangout
theorists always say their alleged DEW is cold.) Also at
a 911 forum,
a forum administrator named Quest noted that, “I have an acquaintance
who was a NYC cop on 9/11 when the second tower came down. He was 3
blocks away and told me there was "incredible heat" during the
"collapse".” Heat indeed is the thing that would be felt furthest out
from a nuclear blast. Read
this account
of physicist, Dr. Phillip Morrison 10 miles from the Trinity nuclear
test site. He said, "Suddenly, not only was there a bright light, but
where we were, 10 miles away, there was the heat of the sun on our
faces.” [This was before the Sun came up.] So we see the similarity of
statements, regarding heat during a nuclear blast, made by the Trinity
witness, John Axisa, Quest’s policeman, Felipe David, and the three burn
victims interviewed by Larry King. I have written that the nukes used
on 9/11 were 1/100th to 1/1000th (each) of the intensity of the Trinity
blast (with several per tower used, and only one per smaller WTC
buildings) and we also have some shielding by the building. So the
distance that radiation would be able to propagate would be vastly less
than the 10 miles felt by Dr. Morrison (noted above), where the test was
in the open air. Those in the towers, and nearby, would indeed be
bombarded by the (unseen) radiation from a mini-nuke. Given these ideas
from this physicist, who has taught physics at several universities, can
Quest please further interview his cop friend, and get back to us here
at comments, or via email to Spooked?
There has been at least
one study published
of WTC responders’ medical problems treated on scene, from 9/14/01 to
11/20/1, at the WTC. This was published in May-June, 2005, of
“Prehospital and Disaster Medicine,” and was authored by: K.R. Peritt,
W.L. Boal, and “The Helix Group, Inc.” This third “author” listed is a
media corporation. (I did not know that corporations, per se, could now
be authors?) This study related to a 10 week period whereby a Federal
govt agency, the “United States Public Health Service (USPHS), deployed
Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMATs) and the Commissioned Corps to
provide on-site, primary medical care to anyone who presented.” The
authors conclusion admits, the “USPHS visits probably were skewed to
milder complaints when compared to analyses of employer medical
department reports or hospital cases…” This appears to mean that the
more serious cases went straight to the hospital. There were 9,349
on-site patient visits, which included some surrounding residents. There
were 30 cases of nausea and vomiting. Let us look at skin conditions
reported. There were 253 1st or 2nd degree burns, of which 107 (42%)
were said to be related to equipment use. There is no word on what
caused the other 58% of these burns. In addition, there are 132 cases of
“other” skin problems reported. There is not a single case of third
degree burns (the most serious), and no comment on this lack! Were there
people with more serious burns that went straight to the hospital, and
thus are not counted? There are some curious statistics: “Other injury
or illness: 696 cases,” and “Not classifiable as an injury or illness:
920 cases.” That’s quite a lot of cases that are either “other” or “not
classifiable,” about 17%. Why such a high percentage? They’re not
“psychological” because they reported 78 cases of this. Is any medical
condition being covered up? Did they test for radiation which is not
mentioned? And what caused the 146 cases of burns that were not due to
equipment handling? And how many people had third degree burns among the
responders? Or is this classified information, related to what really
was happening at the WTC, even after its demolition? This study is very
troubling, and looks very “doctored.”
In conclusion now, this
article, and my previous articles archived at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com
and wtc-ChinaSyndrome.blogspot.com indicate the following. The proven
existence of
mini-nukes and
micro-nukes ,
the massive outward explosions seen, the vaporization of a steel press,
the wrinkling into “foil” of a steel door, spherical blast wave
destruction, the “nuclear meteorite,[parts of 4 storeys fused together
at extreme temp.,]” the feeling of heat without fire of numerous
witnesses, the burned or hanging skin--without fire, the responders’
teeth later falling out, the vaporized building contents, the 1157
vaporized people, the massive evidence of the China Syndrome of
resultant nuclear reacting fragments causing the very high heat and
molten steel witnessed by many at least six months after 9/11, and
photographed, the clothing discarding, and decontamination procedures,
my detailed explanation of Ondrovic’ account of Electromagnetic Pulse
and resultant car fire, and the door exploding into her as WTC 5, 6,
were being exploded from within, near her, the micro- or nano-fine
particle size, and much more, all indicate the federal regime set off
numerous mini-nuclear bombs in the WTC on 9/11. The witnesses that my
articles have cited, included numerous WTC workers, numerous
firefighters, EMT worker, responders, stationary engineer, fire
engineering professor, top British and American Structural Engineers who
have been shown “secret” photos denied to the rest of us, NYC
Commissioner, NYC Fire Commissioner, policeman, and others. Many (or the
vast majority of the 503 who were found) other on-scene witnesses
have—for the moment—likely been silenced, as detailed herein—which is
witness tampering, and worse. Scientific data have also been cited,
including —AVIRIS, LIDAR, seismic readings before “collapse”, Tritium
finding (UCAL/Berkeley, and subsequent Tahil study), and the now
exploding number of “rare” cancers among responders, including thyroid,
leukemia, and lymph cancer—all common among radiation victims. Other
data, I have asserted has been altered, or is totally hidden--second
long-delayed AVIRIS data set, and the lack of any further AVIRIS
released.
I assert and accuse— J’Accuse”—that the preponderance
of this evidence demonstrates that the federal government of the United
States of America did explode nuclear bombs inside most of the WTC
buildings on 9/11/01. Furthermore, there was a resultant China Syndrome
(through mechanisms detailed here by me previously) of nuclear reacting
fragments releasing ionizing radiation, and high heat, for at least six
months after 9/11, causing molten steel, and radiation exposure to
thousands of responders and NYC residents. This was an act of treason,
conspiracy, mass murder, genocide, and a ruse for waging war on innocent
peoples around the world—crimes against humanity, and a ruse for
blatantly eradicating American citizens freedoms and rights. The 9/11
WTC nuclear holocaust was not likely even the first time the American
regime did this to its own citizens! Too few people know of this
research into the American government’s
probable nuking of American sailors in 1944.
The
9/11 perpetrators have used, and are using, limited hangouts and psyops
to keep the people from knowing this. These hangouts, ultimately from
the U.S. regime’s “intelligence” agencies, include the bogus “theories”
of the official planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking nonsense, and also
thermite, DEW, and Depleted Uranium [D.U.] (any uranium used on 9/11 at
the WTC, and the China Syndrome aftermath, would have been highly
enriched, not depleted). The observed American military helicopters and
planes directing the initial explosions, and the final nuclear
destruction prove that this was not done by Arabs, Muslims, Iranians,
Israelis, Russians, or Chinese. As with the Kennedy Assassination, this
massive set of actions, and massive cover-up, could only have been
perpetrated by the so-called government of the United States, and not by
any small “rogue elements” therein. Complicit in the original act,
and/or its cover-up, are all the branches of the federal government, its
military, and intelligence agencies, and the Main Stream Media, and
even much of the so-called alternative or internet media which is also
laden with intel agents posing as “truthers,” while pushing the hangouts
listed above. The people of the world must get together, in what may be
their final hour, and act literally to save themselves from
extermination, from the handful of monsters that control humanity.
Nature
has demonstrated that individuals trained to be fearful can all come
together, and overcome this fear, and act and defeat the small number
who had previously seemed to be so invincible and bloodthirsty. We
are indeed likewise in the jaws of these monsters, and have been for a
long time; but likewise again, it is still possible to break free, and
be free. We must try. Like this last video, there are so many more of
us, than of them.
