Pentagon-CIA-CDC: Depleted Uranium Conspiracy

Pentagon-CIA-CDC: Depleted Uranium Conspiracy
by SUE ARRIGO, MD
 (May 13, 2009)
Since I had both health data and DU use data by the day since the 1991, I had plenty of data points to make the correlation between the health and DU use. Note that DU had been used in the Balkan wars in the 1990s, but not in all years. As I am both a mathematician and physician by long training, having spend 16 years total at university, I had the necessary skills to make a proper assessment. In addition, because I had experience in intelligence, I was able to avoid many pitfalls, such as starting with already tampered with data.

The CIA has a sweet-heart relationship with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) which allows it to dictate what the CDC reports and even what data it supplies to researchers requesting it. That is, the CDC keeps several different "books" on morbidity and mortality to supply to different "consumers".

In this way the CDC has helped the CIA and military cover-up incidents of Bio-warfare germs, released unintentionally or even intentionally, inside the US [and other countries as well].
The 1977 Congressional Hearing on MKULTRA revealed that the CIA was in the habit of keeping faked "cover files" to limit US liability and particularly liability of the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers who were giving the CIA its orders behind the scenes, free of "democratic constraints".

But the CIA [Rothschild/Rockefellers] also had other agencies around the world cooking their books to cover up the illegal activities they were engaged in which included fomenting wars, preventing people from having water safe to drink [e.g. Iraq], preventing people from having access to food, medicines, distributing vaccines with Bio-warfare germs such as HIV, infertility drugs, toxins like mercury, anti-human chorogonaditropin antibody inducers, etc. for the purpose of genocide. To cover up these many crimes against humanity around the world, meant that they had their agents, often CIA and MI6 officers, committing black ops to bribe and coerce officials throughout the world to cook their books.

However, because they also wanted to know what was really the result of their genocidal policies, the CIA usually kept the original databases "off the record" at the CIA's headquarters at Langley as well as supplying them to the Fort Detrick US Army Chemical and BioWarfare Research Labs. That Lab as well as the CIA's own labs, needed the original data to prove the effectiveness of their "interventions".

For example, about 15,000 black Rhodesians died of Anthrax during the time CIA Bio-warfare expert Hatfield was in Rhodesia according to an internet article. I didn't have doubt in my mind, after reviewing the Labs, that the internet article was correct for the gist of the events leading to those many deaths.

However, most countries prefer to keep such secrets from the public, we could generously attribute the motive to not wanting to alarm the public (while killing them, or intending to still kill them later as soon as a suitable opportunity arise, or acquiescing to the CIA doing it in the name of progress in "freedom and democracy"). All this is to say that the CIA forced the CDC to alter its database in rather major ways after I delivered my report on the health consequences in the US from the DU. I should mention that because of my ties inside British intelligence I had included the real data on British use of DU in my mathematical analysis.

Both the CIA and British Intelligence asked me to look at the cooked books of morbidity and mortality data to determine if their cover-ups were successful. Each of the 3 times that they did this I was able to quickly recover most of the correlations at their correct strengths because, metaphorically speaking, the scientists employed to falsify the data were not able to cut down the trees without leaving evident the fact that a forest had once been there!

In fact, all one had to do was cut down a single tree and one had the whole story recorded in the rings -the impairment of the health of the tree and the radioactive particles that caused it. The leaves of the trees "breath in" the nanoparticles of DU rather like human lungs do. So, the fourth time the CIA brought me the re-cooked data to ask me if I could still find the relationship between the DU use in war zones and health in the US, I pointed out the window at a tree across the parking lot and said, "Yep, I still see it."

The CIA officials was not happy with my answer and insisted that I prove that the data exists in each tree which started growing before 1991. I asked the CIA to pick the trees. They brought in 3 trees; one from near the Arctic circle, one from botanical gardens in Washington, D.C. which was a bonsai, and another one from the French Riveria which is as far away as they could believe the effect could be demonstrated.

I called the botanical garden and found out the bonsai was a precious 200-year-old Japanese tree which had survived the A-bombs and had just been stolen. This particular bonsai was listed in a CIA data base as something which survived radiation well. I offered to return it to the botanical garden.

Thus exposed as the thieves, the CIA cut a deal with the botanical gardens to have one of their bonsai experts make an "artistic" cut in the tree to remove for analysis a wedge of it dating back to at least the atomic blasts in Japan. The botanical gardens graciously agreed in exchange for getting their tree back. The tree had experienced a near death once before. When it was brought to the US by ship by a marauding US soldier in his duffle bag in the late 1940s, it had dried up for lack of water. He took it to a botanical garden in the hopes they could revive it. The curator thought it was dead and put it in the trash. One of the gardeners dug it out again and brought it back to life. The bonsai's tree rings showed that, except for that one year in which it was transported to the US, it accurately recorded the relationship between the health of living cells and the toxic effects of radiation - even when the radiation was used half a world away in Iraq, Yugoslavia, or Afghanistan. Contrary to the common belief that humans are more sensitive to radiation than other living things like hard trees, the facts show that all life is remarkably susceptible to assaults on its genetic material.

The CIA then wanted to know how much damage to the human DNA had already occurred as a result of DU use. Actually I was given the question a little bit differently, "How much DNA damage is caused by the use of a thousand tons of DU?" My immediate response which turned out not to be far wrong was to pick up a marking pen and say, "This much is too much for any human being to ever be the same afterwards!" I rephrased the question as "How much human DNA is damaged by the use of one depleted uranium rod [about the size of a cigar]?"

The CIA official was taken aback and said, "No, we don't want an answer to that question. We want you to answer to my question. It will be too hard to explain our conclusion that it is safe to use a thousand tons of DU, if you answer the question based on one rod." So, the official withdrew the question from my inbox.

Some days later he came back and said, I still need an answer from you about the DU damage to the DNA. I naturally asked him, "Why do you need it since you are going to lie and say it is safe to use tons of it?" He said, "I need your name in my bibliography so that my report will be believed!" I replied, "You want my research, in order to substantiate your lies?" "Yes," he replied as if that was the most natural thing in the world to ask for. Well, it was at the CIA! That was their normal mode of operation - find out the truth just in the service of selling lies to a White House anxiously waiting for their order of them to be fulfilled!

I decided to investigate the answer to his question, but write my own report. He could still quote some irrelevant section of it to bolster his citations, but others would be able to read my report in full, if they chose to, so I thought at the time. The question is not "How much radiation does it take to make a change in the DNA of one base pair?" , but "How much radiation is safe to use to avoid damage to the DNA which results in illness, say an illness severe enough to send you to the doctor?" Parts of the question are "Does radiation cause illness only by mutations it causes to the DNA?" "Does it making a person sick through damage to their DNA, mean that they are also likely to have children with damaged DNA who will also be sick from it?"

About 83% of the a cell's dysfunction after radiation exposure is due to damage to the DNA. The damage to the DNA is more important than the damage done to other parts of the cell because the DNA is like the Commander in Chief of all of the cell's other functions.

The US veterans returning from the 1990s wars were mostly sick. The US government had not monitored their radiation exposure because it knew that the DU would make them sick and didn’t want the liability, including criminal liability for wittingly using DU knowing it would cause radiation illness indiscriminately for billions of years. However, the veterans and their children had DNA which could be examined, and estranged unexposed siblings and their children to act as a control group. Each Pentagon had the dates each veteran was at each base, Stateside or otherwise.

Since I had the data showing how much DU was used each day, it was not hard for me to run a study using willing veterans and their families. It is very sad that the US government would not come clean and give the results of my study to the veterans and the public.

Even if a soldier never left a US base they had DNA damage during their years in the service, from DU use in the war zones. Not only that, their children born later had DNA damage which matched their damage, and also had more damage for each year the US continued to use DU.

So, I looked at DU correlations with visits to a physician in which a veteran was paying out of pocket. The answer was that 2 rods of DU used in a war zone half way around the world was enough to make a significant difference in the number of veterans seeking urgent medical care. That was true for both chronic conditions like COPD and heart disease, and new conditions like a first stroke. How significant am I talking about- "statistically significant, but meaningless minor increases", or "what a moment, that impacts our bottom line in a major way due to days lost in sick leave, increased health insurance premiums, and real suffering by a lot of people".

The veterans who never left the US during their service, were so much sicker than they should have been that there was a conference in which industrialists argued to blacklist them from getting jobs in their companies so as not to raise their company’s health premiums.

Let me back up a little. Insurance companies have figured out that veterans returning from the war zones are at high risk of early death and don't want to give them life insurance or supplemental health insurance. But they also figured out that all the veterans on the bases which have planes from the war zones landing, are high risk customers. One of the underwriters I called up put it to me this way, "Those boys are sick - all of them. It doesn't matter where they served, the dirt falls downhill."

Satellites with equipment to record ElectroMagnetic spectrum photos, also record radioactive materials left on the ground. US bases where planes from the war zones land show up as hot spots on the globe from space. How hot the bases are depends on the number of planes returning and how much DU was used in the preceding 4.6 billion years from their point of take off. Some bases had much higher rates of sick days of leave than others. There was a direct correlation between the air traffic and the days of sick leave.

Going to a DU war zone was terrible for your health, and staying at a base was still pretty bad. Going to a war zone for a year was like cutting 20 years off your life and having the amount of disability of having a cold/flu for the rest of your life, not to mention the almost certainty of suffering from cancer, if you lived long enough. Going to a DU war zone for 2 years was like knowing you were destined to die before your kids graduated from high school and yelling at them anyway in helpless frustration. It was like wanting to get a job to pay the bills and knowing it was hopeless to even try because you were too sick.

It was like having to have a beer brought to your bedside to drink it, instead of going out to a bar with your friends. Going to a DU war zone for 3 years was like signing up for slow suicide by debilitating illness.

It was like feeling you were going to die in the next ten years even though you were only 30, and not usually being far off.

It was like standing in line to get an injection knowing it would give you cancer soon and being too tired and depressed to get out of the line. Staying on the support base for two years was like smoking like a fiend, even when you didn't, [cutting about 10 years off your life] and getting out of shape even when you worked out everyday.

To put things in perspective, living in the Los Angeles smog cuts about 2 years off your life and makes your lungs hurt if you jog, and gives you mild shortness of breath as an elderly person.

So what did the US's use of DU do to the average person living in the US? The average person can expect to have 3.5 years cut off their life, have twice as many sick days, feel "washed out", and have increasingly more cancer. During the Civil War, cancer was rare. Now a third to half of people in the US can be expected to suffer from it. But the cancer rates are not going to decrease any time soon because the DU is still being used and the amount of radioactive dust lodged in a person's body is going up over time, not down.

Everyone on the planet already has some base-change mutations in their DNA due to the US’s use of depleted uranium. And everyone already has a decrease in their body’s ability to heal from the US’s use of depleted uranium. That means that they have a decreased ability to heal their DNA as well.

The DNA is constantly being repaired, to the best of the body's ability to do so. When you get a regular sun burn you get damage to the DNA of your skin. If you take vitamin C right after getting the sun burn it helps to decrease the long term residual damage to your DNA of your skin. That damage can cause wrinkles and skin cancer, but it does not cause genetic defects and birth defects in your children.

The problem is that the DU gets deposited in the body and keeps on causing damage day after day, year after year, unlike a sun burn.

A subsequent study was done on children having accidents in the week after the Feb. 2004 nuclear explosions. The amount of radiation was measured in the scar tissue they formed. Remember that a significant number of children died due to their severe injuries instead of recovered from them because radioactive DU particles landed in their open wounds and impaired the healing of them. Scar tissue shrinks over time, concentrating that radiation even more. It is not that it is a large amount of radiation as Geiger counters measure it. It is a problem because it will be there the rest of the person's life, in addition to that which lodges in the lungs or gets eaten with food.

The CIA wanted to know whether that scar tissue should be cut out because it had more radiation in it than other tissue. The answer is that in some cases, to prevent cancers later, that scar tissue formed right after the US used mini-nukes or DU would be better cut out. But given that the US continues to use DU, on what day would it be safe to do it?

Also, if the US continues to use these radioactive weapons, the toxic particles will continue to be added into the person's body. Some of them migrate from the lungs by traveling in the blood. At a certain point, the previously untraumatized tissues of the body may end up with more radiation in them than the white scar tissue which has less blood supply. So, unless the US stops using radioactive weapons, cutting out scar tissue is fraught with risks and uncertain benefit.

However, for soldiers injured in the war zones where the dust was highly radioactive the answer is that their risk of cancer in adjacent organs or skin would likely be significantly reduced if they had surgical resection of their most radioactive scars, where it was safe to do so. That is, organs lying under such scars are at 2 to 3 fold increased risk of getting cancer and it is better to cut out a surface scar than suffer from the cancer of an organ later.

[Note: I am not revealing National Security secrets to terrorists. Satellite photos show where US bases are. Everyone with a satellite and the images from them already knows. Google Earth and other maps show them as well. If a military wants to keep the location of a base secret, it knows it has to build it underground without a runway for planes.]

Dr. Judy Wood

Horrifying US Secret Weaponry Unleashed in Baghdad

Bill Dash – Far Shores August 24, 2003

A nightmarish US super weapon reportedly was employed by American ground forces during chaotic street fighting in Baghdad. The secret tank-mounted weapon was witnessed in all its frightening power by Majid al-Ghazali, a seasoned Iraqi infantryman who described the device and its gruesome effects as unlike anything he had ever encountered in his lengthy military service. The disturbing revelation is yet another piece of cinematic evidence brought back from postwar Iraq by intrepid filmmaker Patrick Dillon.

In the film, al-Ghazali, whose English is less than fluent, describes the weapon as reminiscent of a flame thrower, only immensely more powerful. It is unclear what principle the weapon is based on. Searching for a description, al-Ghazali said it appeared to be shooting concentrated lightning bolts rather than just ordinary flames. Drawing on his many years as a professional engineer, al-Ghazali speculates that radiation of some kind probably figures into the weapon's hideous capabilities. Like all men in Saddam's Iraq, al-Ghazali was compelled to serve in the Iraqi equivalent of the Army National Guard and fought in three wars over the past thirty-odd years. Via email, he told me he has seen virtually every type of conventional weapon employed in battle, and is well acquainted with their effects on people and machines, but nothing in his extensive combat experience prepared him for the shock of what he saw in Baghdad on April 12th.

On that date, al-Ghazali and his family sheltered in their house as a fierce street battle erupted in his neighborhood. In the midst of the fighting, he noticed that the Americans had called up an oddly configured tank. Then to his amazement the tank suddenly let loose a blinding stream of what seemed like fire and lightning, engulfing a large passenger bus and three automobiles. Within seconds the bus had become semi-molten, sagging "like a wet rag" as he put it. He said the bus rapidly melted under this withering blast, shrinking until it was a twisted blob about the dimensions of a VW bug. As if that were not bizarre enough, al-Ghazali explicitly describes seeing numerous human bodies shriveled to the size of newborn babies. By the time local street fighting ended that day, he estimates between 500 and 600 soldiers and civilians had been cooked alive as a result of the mysterious tank-mounted device.

In a city littered everywhere with burned-out civilian and military vehicles, US forces were abnormally scrupulous about immediately detailing bulldozers and shovel crews to the job of burying the grim wreckage. Nevertheless, telltale remnants remained as Dillon found when al-Ghazali later took him to the site. Dillon said they easily uncovered large puddles of resolidified metal and mounds of weird fibrous material that, al-Ghazali explained, were all that remained of the vehicles' tires. Dillon, who accumulated plenty of battlefield experience as a medic in Viet-Nam, and has since covered a number of wars from Somalia to Kosovo, told me that he has witnessed every kind of conventional ordnance that can be used on humans and vehicles. " I've seen a freaking smorgasbord of destruction in my life," he said, "flame-throwers, napalm, white phosphorous, thermite, you name it. I know of nothing short of an H-bomb that conceivably might cause a bus to instantly liquefy or that can flash broil a human body down to the size of an infant. God pity humanity if that thing is a preview of what's in store for the 21st century." 

For Majid al-Ghazali, images of the terrifying weapon and its victims haunt his every day. In addition to his work as an engineer, he is also a highly accomplished classical violinist, occupying the first chair in the Baghdad Symphony. He is widely acknowledged as one of the preeminent violinists in the Middle East. Besides his family, one of his greatest joys is teaching at Baghdad's premier music conservatory. Unfortunately, the conservatory was utterly destroyed. Yet somehow, despite the war's horrors and its seemingly endless privations, he manages to maintain a remarkably hopeful outlook. He recently informed me that the Baghdad Symphony continues to exist and has been invited to perform in the United States in December.
Copyright ©2003 - Bill Dash

Gulf War Studies Link Cancer to Depleted Uranium

Published on Monday, January 29, 2001 in the New York Times

Gulf War Studies Link Cancer to Depleted Uranium

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines01/0129-03.htm

by Marlise Simons

 PARIS — The cancer deaths of 24 European soldiers who served as peacekeepers in the Balkans and the illnesses reported by many others have stirred alarm in Europe about the use of depleted uranium in munitions fired from American warplanes during the conflicts in Bosnia and Kosovo.
No one has provably linked the use of depleted uranium to the deaths or illnesses of Balkan veterans, and many scientists consider such a link impossible. Nor is it clear that cancers are occurring at a higher rate among former peacekeepers than in the population at large.

Background on Depleted Uranium AmmunitionFor much more check out: Discounted Casualties - The Human Cost of Depleted Uranium provided by the Hiroshima, Japan newspaper - The Chugoku Shimbun. Also the Federation of American Scientists has a Depleted Uranium Ammunition page. And the Military Toxics Project has a campaign against depleted uranium weapons. (left) US Armor Piercing Incendiary [Depleted Uranium] 30mm Ammunition

But the fears often stirred by mention of radiation have sent doctors, military experts and politicians scurrying for explanations. Among the research they are re-examining is the work of a retired United States Army colonel who has insisted that some of the illnesses he has observed in Persian Gulf war veterans may be linked to the depleted uranium and uranium 236 isotope he says he found in their bodies.Asaf Durakovic began examining gulf war veterans when he worked as chief of nuclear medicine at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Wilmington, Del., in the 1990's. Since that post was abolished in 1997, he has continued with his privately funded research in Toronto.
In a recent interview, he said his analysis over the last three years of body fluids of more than 40 American, British and Canadian gulf war veterans who have turned to him keeps turning up evidence of depleted uranium and uranium 236, a more radioactive uranium isotope.
Dr. Durakovic said that, unlike many other institutions involved in testing for uranium, he uses mass spectometry tests that measure the relative abundance of each isotope in the body.
He said he found depleted uranium, including uranium 236, in 62 percent of the sick gulf war veterans he examined. He believes that particles lodged in their bodies and may be a cause of their illnesses.
Radiation experts in France and Britain say they are now rereading his work because he was the first to report that he found uranium 236 in the urine as well as in the bone tissue of gulf war veterans. They suspect that its presence indicates that other contaminants may be present.
"This cannot be conventional depleted uranium," said Monique Sené, a physicist who is prominent in France's large atomic research establishment, when asked about Dr. Durakovic's findings. "The ratios he found do not exist in nature. This contains nuclear waste."
Dr. Durakovic's work has been circulating among NATO medical staff members. Several universities have asked him to collaborate, and he has been invited to brief the government in Italy, which raised the alarm about sick peacekeepers and where 10 soldiers have recently died.
Dr. Durakovic, 60, has worked in radiation biology for over 30 years in Britain, Canada and the United States. His work won plaudits from the Defense Nuclear Agency, the United States Army research center. Last year, he presented his studies at the conference of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine in Paris. His work is now also described in a newly published book, "Depleted Uranium, Invisible War," which has received broad news media attention in France.
Dr. Durakovic said that when he started tests on 24 American gulf war veterans he was asked to examine in 1991 by a colleague at a New Jersey hospital, urine samples were lost and his efforts to get more precise tests were discouraged. Eventually, he said, he was dismissed.
At the veterans hospital in Wilmington, a spokeswoman, Barbara Howell, said Dr. Durakovic's employment ended because "we did not need a full-time nuclear medicine physician." She said that no samples had been lost, and that in all samples tested the levels of uranium "were within normal limits." Dr. Durakovic said he never got test reports. NATO officials fear that the concern in Europe could lead eventually to a ban on munitions containing depleted uranium, which is an exceptionally hard metal and therefore suited for penetrating tanks.
Both NATO and the Pentagon have brought forward scientists and military experts with evidence that the munitions' low-level radiation is not harmful and that natural uranium is always present in the environment and in the body.
But European anxiety rose again this month when laboratories in Switzerland and Finland announced that they had found small amounts of uranium 236 in shrapnel from American weapons found in Kosovo.
Pierre Roussel, a physicist at the National Center for Scientific Research in Paris, noted that the ratio of uranium 236 found so far was tiny, but added, "The problem is that this isotope can only be produced in a reactor, where it is accompanied by far more radioactive elements."
A Pentagon spokesman who left office with the Clinton administration said on Jan. 18 that it was known that because of possible production flaws, some American depleted uranium contained traces of plutonium, neptunium and americium. He suggested, however, that the amounts were so minute that they posed no danger.
Experts in nuclear medicine in Britain, France and the United States said in interviews that they questioned the idea that there was no danger because experiments on animals had shown that uranium particles could get into the bloodstream, organs and bone, where they could deliver low-level radiation. They say the mechanism of radiation damage is still poorly understood and the debate about what might be a harmful dose is still open.
"Depleted uranium, mostly U238, has been found stored in bone, and if it gets into bone, it can reach the bone marrow," said Jean-François Lacronique, the director of the National Radiation Protection Agency in France, which oversees safety for workers in France's nuclear power plants. "Depending on the dose and the length of exposure, any kind of radiation can cause leukemia."
Dr. Durakovic said he believed that there was a fundamental difference between the effects of depleted uranium outside and inside the body.
Outside, he said, it does no harm. But when depleted uranium is blown up it burns at high temperatures, he said, and "it changes into uranium oxides — tiny, hard particles that are microns in size."
"They can stay airborne as aerosols, be blown around by the wind and fall down as dust. Because they are the size of microns, people can inhale them."
Once inhaled, Dr. Durakovic added, uranium can get into the bloodstream, be carried to bone, lymph nodes, lungs or kidneys, lodge there, and cause damage when it emits low- level radiation over a long period. Critics of Dr. Durakovic's work said his findings were inconclusive and did not provide a definitive link between uranium and the illnesses of veterans, but Dr. Durakovic says he does not make that claim but instead that his tests reveal the "distinct" presence of radioactive uranium particles in his patients.

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

Depleted uranium:Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets

Depleted uranium:
Dirty bombs, dirty missiles, dirty bullets

http://www.sfbayview.com/081804/Depleteduranium081804.shtml
A death sentence here and abroad
by Leuren Moret

“Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.” - Henry Kissinger, quoted in “Kiss the Boys Goodbye: How the United States Betrayed Its Own POW’s in Vietnam”
They brought it home
How did they hide it?
The US has a dirty (DU) little (CIA) secret
Vietnam was a chemical war for oil, permanently contaminating large regions and countries downriver with Agent Orange, and environmentally the most devastating war in world history. But since 1991, the U.S. has staged four nuclear wars using depleted uranium weaponry, which, like Agent Orange, meets the U.S. government definition of Weapons of Mass Destruction. Vast regions in the Middle East and Central Asia have been permanently contaminated with radiation.
And what about our soldiers? Terry Jemison of the Department of Veterans Affairs reported this week to the American Free Press that “Gulf-era veterans” now on medical disability since 1991 number 518,739, with only 7,035 reported wounded in Iraq in that same 14-year period.
This week the American Free Press dropped a “dirty bomb” on the Pentagon by reporting that eight out of 20 men who served in one unit in the 2003 U.S. military offensive in Iraq now have malignancies. That means that 40 percent of the soldiers in that unit have developed malignancies in just 16 months.
Since these soldiers were exposed to vaccines and depleted uranium (DU) only, this is strong evidence for researchers and scientists working on this issue, that DU is the definitive cause of Gulf War Syndrome. Vaccines are not known to cause cancer. One of the first published researchers on Gulf War Syndrome, who also served in 1991 in Iraq, Dr. Andras Korényi-Both, is in agreement with Barbara Goodno from the Department of Defense’s Deployment Health Support Directorate, that in this war soldiers were not exposed to chemicals, pesticides, bioagents or other suspect causes this time to confuse the issue.
This powerful new evidence is blowing holes in the cover-up perpetrated by the Pentagon and three presidential administrations ever since DU was first used in 1991 in the Persian Gulf War. Fourteen years after the introduction of DU on the battlefield in 1991, the long-term effects have revealed that DU is a death sentence and very nasty stuff.
Scientists studying the biological effects of uranium in the 1960s reported that it targets the DNA. Marion Fulk, a nuclear physical chemist retired from the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab and formerly involved with the Manhattan Project, interprets the new and rapid malignancies in soldiers from the 2003 war as “spectacular … and a matter of concern.”
This evidence shows that of the three effects which DU has on biological systems - radiation, chemical and particulate – the particulate effect from nano-size particles is the most dominant one immediately after exposure and targets the Master Code in the DNA. This is bad news, but it explains why DU causes a myriad of diseases which are difficult to define.
In simple words, DU “trashes the body.” When asked if the main purpose for using it was for destroying things and killing people, Fulk was more specific: “I would say that it is the perfect weapon for killing lots of people.”
Soldiers developing malignancies so quickly since 2003 can be expected to develop multiple cancers from independent causes. This phenomenon has been reported by doctors in hospitals treating civilians following NATO bombing with DU in Yugoslavia in 1998-1999 and the U.S. military invasion of Iraq using DU for the first time in 1991. Medical experts report that this phenomenon of multiple malignancies from unrelated causes has been unknown until now and is a new syndrome associated with internal DU exposure.
Just 467 U.S. personnel were wounded in the three-week Persian Gulf War in 1990-1991. Out of 580,400 soldiers who served in Gulf War I, 11,000 are dead, and by 2000 there were 325,000 on permanent medical disability. This astounding number of disabled vets means that a decade later, 56 percent of those soldiers who served now have medical problems.
The number of disabled vets reported up to 2000 has been increasing by 43,000 every year. Brad Flohr of the Department of Veterans Affairs told American Free Press that he believes there are more disabled vets now than even after World War II.
They brought it home
Not only were soldiers exposed to DU on and off the battlefields, but they brought it home. DU in the semen of soldiers internally contaminated their wives, partners and girlfriends. Tragically, some women in their 20s and 30s who were sexual partners of exposed soldiers developed endometriosis and were forced to have hysterectomies because of health problems.
In a group of 251 soldiers from a study group in Mississippi who had all had normal babies before the Gulf War, 67 percent of their post-war babies were born with severe birth defects. They were born with missing legs, arms, organs or eyes or had immune system and blood diseases. In some veterans’ families now, the only normal or healthy members of the family are the children born before the war.
The Department of Veterans Affairs has stated that they do not keep records of birth defects occurring in families of veterans.
How did they hide it?
Before a new weapons system can be used, it must be fully tested. The blueprint for depleted uranium weapons is a 1943 declassified document from the Manhattan Project.
Harvard President and physicist James B. Conant, who developed poison gas in World War I, was brought into the Manhattan Project by the father of presidential candidate John Kerry. Kerry’s father served at a high level in the Manhattan Project and was a CIA agent.
Conant was chair of the S-1 Poison Gas Committee, which recommended developing poison gas weapons from the radioactive trash of the atomic bomb project in World War II. At that time, it was known that radioactive materials dispersed in bombs from the air, from land vehicles or on the battlefield produced very fine radioactive dust which would penetrate all protective clothing, any gas mask or filter or the skin. By contaminating the lungs and blood, it could kill or cause illness very quickly.
They also recommended it as a permanent terrain contaminant, which could be used to destroy populations by contaminating water supplies and agricultural land with the radioactive dust.
The first DU weapons system was developed for the Navy in 1968, and DU weapons were given to and used by Israel in 1973 under U.S. supervision in the Yom Kippur war against the Arabs.
The Phalanx weapons system, using DU, was tested on the USS Bigelow out of Hunters Point Naval Shipyard in 1977, and DU weapons have been sold by the U.S. to 29 countries.
Military research report summaries detail the testing of DU from 1974-1999 at military testing grounds, bombing and gunnery ranges and at civilian labs under contract. Today 42 states are contaminated with DU from manufacture, testing and deployment.
Women living around these facilities have reported increases in endometriosis, birth defects in babies, leukemia in children and cancers and other diseases in adults. Thousands of tons of DU weapons tested for decades by the Navy on four bombing and gunnery ranges around Fallon, Nevada, is no doubt the cause of the fastest growing leukemia cluster in the U.S. over the past decade. The military denies that DU is the cause.
The medical profession has been active in the cover-up - just as they were in hiding the effects from the American public - of low level radiation from atmospheric testing and nuclear power plants. A medical doctor in Northern California reported being trained by the Pentagon with other doctors, months before the 2003 war started, to diagnose and treat soldiers returning from the 2003 war for mental problems only.
Medical professionals in hospitals and facilities treating returning soldiers were threatened with $10,000 fines if they talked about the soldiers or their medical problems. They were also threatened with jail.
Reporters have also been prevented access to more than 14,000 medically evacuated soldiers flown nightly since the 2003 war in C-150s from Germany who are brought to Walter Reed Hospital near Washington, D.C.
Dr. Robert Gould, former president of the Bay Area chapter of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), has contacted three medical doctors since February 2004, after I had been invited to speak about DU. Dr. Katharine Thomasson, president of the Oregon chapter of the PSR, informed me that Dr. Gould had contacted her and tried to convince her to cancel her invitation for me to speak about DU at Portland State University on April 12. Although I was able to do a presentation, Dr. Thomasson told me I could only talk about DU in Oregon “and nothing overseas … nothing political.”
Dr. Gould also contacted and discouraged Dr. Ross Wilcox in Toronto, Canada, from inviting me to speak to Physicians for Global Survival (PGS), the Canadian equivalent of PSR, several months later. When that didn’t work, he contacted Dr. Allan Connoly, the Canadian national president of PGS, who was able to cancel my invitation and nearly succeeded in preventing Dr. Wilcox, his own member, from showing photos and presenting details on civilians suffering from DU exposure and cancer provided to him by doctors in southern Iraq.
Dr. Janette Sherman, a former and long-standing member of PSR, reported that she finally quit some time after being invited to lunch by a new PSR executive administrator. After the woman had pumped Dr. Sherman for information all through lunch about her position on key issues, the woman informed Dr. Sherman that her last job had been with the CIA.
How was the truth about DU hidden from military personnel serving in successive DU wars? Before his tragic death, Sen. Paul Wellstone informed Joyce Riley, R.N., B.S.N., executive director of the American Gulf War Veterans Association, that 95 percent of Gulf War veterans had been recycled out of the military by 1995. Any of those continuing in military service were isolated from each other, preventing critical information being transferred to new troops. The “next DU war” had already been planned, and those planning it wanted “no skunk at the garden party.”
The US has a dirty (DU) little (CIA) secret
A new book just published at the American Free Press by Michael Collins Piper, “The High Priests of War: The Secret History of How America’s Neo-Conservative Trotskyites Came to Power and Orchestrated the War Against Iraq as the First Step in Their Drive for Global Empire,” details the early plans for a war against the Arab world by Henry Kissinger and the neo-cons in the late 1960s and early 1970s. That just happens to coincide with getting the DU “show on the road” and the oil crisis in the Middle East, which caused concern not only to President Nixon. The British had been plotting and scheming for control of the oil in Iraq for decades since first using poison gas on the Iraqis and Kurds in 1912.
The book details the creation of the neo-cons by their “godfather” and Trotsky lover Irving Kristol, who pushed for a “war against terrorism” long before 9/11 and was lavishly funded for years by the CIA. His son, William Kristol, is one of the most influential men in the United States.
Both are public relations men for the Israeli lobby’s neo-conservative network, with strong ties to Rupert Murdoch. Kissinger also has ties to this network and the Carlyle Group, who, one could say, have facilitated these omnicidal wars beginning from the time former President Bush took office. It would be easy to say that we are recycling World Wars I and II, with the same faces.
When I asked Vietnam Special Ops Green Beret Capt. John McCarthy, who could have devised this omnicidal plan to use DU to destroy the genetic code and genetic future of large populations of Arabs and Moslems in the Middle East and Central Asia - just coincidentally the areas where most of the world’s oil deposits are located - he replied: “It has all the handprints of Henry Kissinger.”
In Zbignew Brzezinski’s book “The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives,” the map of the Eurasian chessboard includes four regions strategic to U.S. foreign policy. The “South” region corresponds precisely to the regions now contaminated permanently with radiation from U.S. bombs, missiles and bullets made with thousands of tons of DU.
A Japanese professor, Dr. K. Yagasaki, has calculated that 800 tons of DU is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. The U.S. has used more DU since 1991 than the atomicity equivalent of 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. Four nuclear wars indeed, and 10 times the amount of radiation released into the atmosphere from atmospheric testing!
No wonder our soldiers, their families and the people of the Middle East, Yugoslavia and Central Asia are sick. But as Henry Kissinger said after Vietnam when our soldiers came home ill from Agent Orange, “Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used for foreign policy.”
Unfortunately, more and more of those soldiers are men and women with brown skin. And unfortunately, the DU radioactive dust will be carried around the world and deposited in our environments just as the “smog of war” from the 1991 Gulf War was found in deposits in South America, the Himalayas and Hawaii.
In June 2003, the World Health Organization announced in a press release that global cancer rates will increase 50 percent by 2020. What else do they know that they aren’t telling us? I know that depleted uranium is a death sentence … for all of us. We will all die in silent ways.
To learn more
Sources used in this story that readers are encouraged to consult:
American Free Press four-part series on DU byChristopher Bollyn.
Part I: "Depleted Uranium: U.S. Commits War Crime Against Iraq, Humanity,"
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/depleted_uranium.html
Part II: "Cancer Epidemic Caused by U.S. WMD: MD Says
Depleted Uranium Definitively
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/cancer_epidemic_.html
Part III: "DU Syndrome Stricken Vets Denied Care: Pentagon Hides DU Dangers to Deny Medical Care to Vets",
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/du_syndrome.html
Part IV: "Pentagon Brass Suppresses Truth About Toxic Weapons: Poisonous Uranium Munitions Threaten World",
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/pentagon_brass.html
  August 2004 World Affairs Journal. Leuren Moret: "Depleted Uranium: The Trojan Horse of Nuclear War," http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2004/DU-Trojan-Horse1jul04.htm
August 2004 Coastal Post Online. Carol Sterrit: "Marin
Depleted Uranium Resolution Heats Up - GI's Will Come Home To A Slow Death,"
http://www.coastalpost.com/04/08/01.htm
  World Depleted Uranium Weapons Conference, Hamburg,
Germany, October 16-19, 2004:
http://www.uraniumweaponsconference.de/speakers.htm
  International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan.
Written opinion of Judge Niloufer Baghwat:
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004/Afghanistan-Criminal-Tribunal10mar04.htm
  "Discounted Casualties: The Human Cost of Nuclear War" by Akira Tashiro, foreword by Leuren Moret,
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/index_e.html
Leuren Moret is a geoscientist who has worked around the world on radiation issues, educating citizens, the media, members of parliaments and Congress and other officials. She became a whistleblower in 1991 at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab after experiencing major science fraud on the Yucca Mountain Project. An environmental commissioner in the City of Berkeley, she can be reached at leurenmoret@yahoo.com.

US Used Small Nuclear Weapons in Iraq

US Used Small Nuclear Weapons in Iraq
by SUE ARRIGO, MD
 (4-28-09) The CIA has tortured me in Madrid now also, not surprisingly, but I am in good spirits nevertheless. I still have hopes of meeting with the lawyer Gonzalo Boye and judge Baltasor Garzon who are involved in the lawsuit against the Bush lawyers. But the torture and brainwashing which accompanies it makes it harder for me.

Meanwhile, I am reading about Universal Jurisdiction and trying to put what I know in a framework which the Spanish legal system can use. Here are some of my writings on the subject, perhaps you will find out of it worth publishing.

Bush, Jr. posted how to make nuclear weapons on a White House website in Arabic! What follows are not national security secrets which tell Muslims how to make weapons, but show the need for the US to use restraint in its policies. This is what the citizens need to know to protect themselves from the reckless endangering of the world by men drunk on power in high places.

911 sent the world to war in the Middle East.
The US and UK did not provide proof that the Muslims listed as the hijackers committed the crimes. They did not do the careful police work to track down just the guilty and punish them. It was this failure to punish only the guilty after establishing their guilt in the Courts which lead to the wars.

This failure to confine punishment to the due process of international law was a crime which undermined international law in practice in all countries. If the Spanish do not try those in the US whose duty it was to ensure international law was upheld, they allow themselves to be forced into war based on hearsay or cooked intelligence.

That is, they allow their national agenda to be hijacked based on the statements of foreign officials without their having any way to verify those statements as the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

In addition, by this failure to bring this to trials they allow their military to be sent to war without the informed consent of their populace. This is a violation of the democratic rights of the citizens to have their nation’s decisions made by the officials they elected.

Spain and other countries allow their citizens to be murdered in illegal or unjust wars based on the unsubstantiated statements of foreign officials. This is treason because it gives a foreign power the right in practice to send the nation to war and kill its citizens without due democratic process based on international law and standards of proof commensurate with the risks of nuclear fallout and war.

The US and UK used depleted uranium in Iraq. It is a third as radioactive as regular uranium and tens of thousands of rounds of it the size of small cigars were used per the official reports. In truth, the amount used was over 10 times what the US and UK officials reported. Its half-life of the destructive potential on the human DNA is more than 4.5 million years.

Immediately the rate of dreadful birth defects skyrocketed, and that is just the start of an upward curve over the next 4.5 million years at a minimum. That curve is not linear. As the DNA degenerates, the ability of the body to heal the DNA decreases and the effects of the radioactivity is compounded over time, like a high interest loan becomes unpayable.

The radioactive dust from the use of depleted uranium in Iraq reached the UK as documented by Dr. Busby and increased the level of radiation to dangerous levels. The response of the US government was to order the radiation detectors in the UK to be turned off for some weeks so that the public would not know the extent of the danger they were subjected to against their will.

In the US, those downwind of the Nevada Test site will have many more cancers. Conservative and largely whitewashed estimates are that there will be an additional 60,000 cases of thyroid cancer due to the dust carried radiation. Since the cost of treatment of each case of cancer can be expected to be over $100,000 USD, the cost will be at a minimum $6 billion dollars in medical costs and much more in lost productivity from thyroid cancer alone.

Birth defects have a much higher lifetime cost and loss of productivity. The use of depleted uranium is undoubtably a war crime of the greatest international concern as the US continues to use depleted uranium in its military actions in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now in Pakistan. It is equivalent to using “dirty bombs”. It is the same as using nuclear bombs except for the initial destructive blast of a few moments.

Since soldiers return to their country of origin they bring back to that nation their damaged DNA and health problems. That constitutes a serious threat to the DNA of a nation and amount to a form of passive, though not necessarily unintended form of genocide. I say not necessarily unintended because I wrote reports to the Bush Administration in 2004 on the genocidal results of using depleted uranium and was present at a Daily Intelligence Briefing of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfled, and Tenet in which my report was discussed.

Bush said, “Who cares? We will be dead by the time people know the consequences.” Cheney said, [and I typed the transcript of the tape myself later so I heard it many times as my typing skills are not so good], “Can we speed up the damage to their DNA to disable them faster?”

I replied, “It is the children having the birth defects and the leukemias.”

He said, “Can we suppress their whole society into future generations this way?”

I said, “You will be suppressing the whole world’s DNA.”

Rumsfeld said, “It doesn’t matter that our troops come home sick, it keeps them from protesting about their Post Traumatic Stress. If anything we need them to come back sicker from unnameable conditions. We don’t want to have to compensate them for this. Can it be detected? Will there be blowback on this, to our Administration?”

I replied, “Yes, definitely.”

Cheney said, “I don’t believe you. You are always trying to rain on our parade. We will go ahead.” Then realizing that was Bush’s line to say, he elbowed him lightly to get him to repeat it. Maybe Bush was on drugs like Librium for his alcoholism because he said as the tape showed, “Our Parade. We will go ahead.” like a parrot forced to repeat what Cheney said but with only a limited memory and understanding of what preceded.

I did check and found White House Security Camera footage would showed Cheney handing Bush a Librium to take before that meeting after Bush objected that he had already taken his Librium that morning.

I thus wrote in my follow up report to Tenet that Bush might not have been competent to make the decision and that it required re-authorization before it could be considered a valid order to continue the use of depleted uranium.

However, to the best of my knowledge, even after using every means available to me within the CIA, the Pentagon, and the White House later (as a negotiator between Tenet and Cheney on who would take the blame for not preventing 911), I was unable to find any evidence that a subsequent more valid authorization of the use of radiation in the war zones had occurred.

That conclusion that the US was using the equivalent of nuclear weapons in terms of their long term consequences without proper authorization from a mentally competent Commander-in-Chief, or duly elected one given the election fraud in 2000, [and in 2004], became the subject of a subsequent report I filed with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and Acting DCI McLaughlin soon after Tenet resigned.

The Joint Chiefs of Staff demanded that the White House supply a new written authorization for the use of so-called Depleted Uranium after realizing that it never had written authorization before, only ‘a verbal order conveyed by Cheney in early 2003. A written order was sent to the Joint Chiefs of Staff with Bush’s stamped signature above Cheney’s handwritten signature in summer 2004.

Acting DCI McLaughlin called Bush in my presence to ask him if he had told Cheney to send that order to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Bush said it was the first he heard of the order, then he was heard to swear briefly at Cheney. He told McLaughlin that he would look into it and call him back.

The White House phone records show that less than a minute later he called David Rockefeller. The CIA’s tape of that call revealed that Bush asked David Rockefeller what the White House’s policy was on the use of depleted uranium.

Rockefeller was reticient to give full answer and just said, “Yes.”

Bush asked him, “You mean we should use it?”

Rockefeller again said just “Yes” and then hung up on Bush.

Bush then went to speak to Cheney according to the White House Security cameras which were clear in the matter. The CIA’s recording of that conversation showed that Bush asked Cheney when he had given the order “to use radiation in Iraq”. Cheney did not give a date.

Then Bush said, “I never gave that order. You have to take it back if you did that in my name. I am not going to poison the fish that way.”

Cheney said, “There are no fish in Iraq”.

Bush said, “Yes, there are. And just as soon as it is safe there, I intend to go fishing there. I want to be able to eat the fish I catch there. You can’t mess with my going fishing in the countries we conquer.”

Cheney gave a non-committal answer. Bush pushed him on it and said, “Just because Rockefeller doesn’t go fishing, doesn’t mean you have a right to take away my fishing trips.”

Cheney said that he would find Bush a better place to go fishing and Bush left his office.

McLaughlin with me in the room and the phone on speaker called Bush back about 25 minutes after the first call. McLaughlin asked him point blank if he had authorized the use of the depleted uranium. Bush said, “No, but David did and Cheney is going to let me go fishing soon.”

Rockefeller was not a duly elected official of the US populace.

Yet, the White House phone record and CIA tapes show that Cheney called David Rockefeller within minutes and asked him to confirm that he still wanted depleted uranium used in the war zones even though it was not proving as effective as expected in disabling the Iraqi populace.

Cheney complained to Rockefeller that the expert Rockefeller sent up to the White House claimed that the Iraqis in a large area where a new batch was to be used would all be disabled with nausea and vomiting due to radiation illness, and that hadn’t happened. [The ‘new batch’ was made by a Rockefeller subsidiary which Cheney owned substantial shares in. ]

Rockefeller said, “Don’t worry, the long term results are good.”

Cheney asked him what long term results he was speaking of. Rockefeller said, “Our profits, you fool.”

Cheney asked him about another joint illegal weapons venture they had going and that discussion lasted 20 minutes before they returned to the topic of the authorization for the depleted uranium use.

Rockefeller said, “I don’t want an order just for depleted uranium, I want it to cover the use of nuclear weapons.”

Cheney said, “First strike?”

And Rockefeller said “Yes.”

Cheney said, “I’ll have trouble getting Bush to sign that.”

Rockefeller said, “Up his drugs.”

Cheney said, “We maxed out on that option already. It doesn’t work so well when he doesn’t even remember signing something. It comes back at us later.”

McLaughlin and I were listening to this conversation live in his office. He was shaking his head in disbelief. He said to me, “I can’t let this conversation go on, what if the Russians or someone else gets hold of it [for blackmail].” He picked up his phone and asked the CIA tech division to patch him into the call between Cheney and Rockefeller.

By the time that happened about 2 minutes later, Rockefeller had told Cheney several other illegal things to do to try to coerce Bush into signing the order based on fear and Cheney had agreed to do them.

When McLaughlin cut into their conversation, he told them to discuss such things in private, not by phone.

Cheney laughed and said, “For a moment I was afraid we were busted.”

Rockefeller asked McLaughlin how much of the conversation he had heard and McLaughlin lied and said he was so busy patching in that he didn’t have time to hear anything. That was not true as CIA Tech Division did the patching and the conversation was played on speaker the whole time while McLaughlin and I waited.

His secretary was also in the room waiting at that point for McLaughlin to make a decision on another matter and he had told her to be quiet so he could concentrate on hearing the conversation.

Rockefeller asked him how he knew to interrupt their conversation and McLaughlin mentioned my name as the remote viewer who brought it to his attention.

Rockefeller said, “Torture her for it and stop monitoring my calls”, and hung up.

McLaughlin turned to me and said, “You were right. There is no valid order for the use of radiation or nuclear weapons in the war zones.”

This was an important issue because the White House had order the use of a new generation of small nuclear weapons which didn’t make mushroom clouds but still caused a nuclear change reaction to be used in Iraq---and the Pentagon had used them.

The next week, after Rockefeller had me tortured, I went back to the Joint Chiefs of Staff with a new report which detailed that the order to use them was not valid, at best a new order would be the result of coercion due to the duress Bush was scheduled to be put under which was cruel and inhumane treatment at the very least. I played for the Joint Chiefs of Staff the relevant parts of the CIA and White House tapes.

My presentation took up about 20 minutes. The Joint Chiefs of Staff were chagrined that they had acted without proper orders. Bizarrely, one of them called Cheney during the meeting right after my presentation and demanded that Cheney get them proper authority which extended retroactively to cover the use of the nuclear weapons.

In retrospect it appeared that the use of the depleted uranium and the Rockefeller’s expert’s story of the “new batch” of it was to cover the detectable after effects of these new nuclear weapons also made by a Rockefeller company. These new nuclear weapons were small enough that the blast did not leave obvious distortions in seismographic records.

However, both the Pentagon and US Intelligence were concerned because the satellite images showed tell tale signs of their use. That meant that any nation with satellites which went within a wide swarth of Iraq might detect that the US had used nuclear change reaction weapons in Iraq. Because of that the US had sent diplomats out to about 20 of its Allies asking them to destroy their satellite images for that day.

The CIA tried to assess whether they had and I was asked to write a report on the subject. As I had negotiated over intelligence matters with the Russians, I called a few of them to ask if their satellite images had shown up anything unusual and if they said Yes, I asked what they thought it was due to.

Three of 4 of them unequivocally stated that the US had used a nuclear weapon in Iraq. One of them went so far as to tell me the precise make, model, and serial number of one of the devices used. I was later to report to the Joint Chiefs of Staff that he got it right.

Over a dozen countries voiced an objection, most of them by back channels. It was no great secret that the US used nuclear weapons in Iraq, not just depleted uranium. But this information has not been given to the public, such as in Spain, and that omission deprives them of their democratic rights to make informed decisions.

For example, the US often claims it might have to go to war in Iran because the Iranians might be enriching uranium and might in the future make a nuclear weapon. The public has not been told that the US’s plans to go to war in Iran include its using nuclear weapons against Iran and that it has already used them in Iraq.

If it knew that they likely would not approve of the US going to war in Iran to get their oil. That would deprive the Rockefellers of that oil, and so the Rockefellers have applied lots of pressure to government officials throughout the world to keep secret the truth in these matters.

However, officials doing so are acting treasonously to follow the advice of a foreigner when it negatively impacts the health of their countrymen and their freedoms and democracy. Knowing the truth carries with it certain responsibilities - including to act to protect the world from the use of nuclear weapons and nuclear war.

Although civil law is largely silent on crimes of omission, dereliction of duty is a serious military offense. I assert that every nation has a duty to press criminal charges against those that have used nuclear weapons and deleted uranium. Otherwise they are an accessory to genocide, both ongoing and in the future.

If a man lights a fuse wire connected to dynamite, he is responsible for the explosion even if it is not 100% certain that the fuse will set off the charge. The more likely the result of an action or inaction is, the more culpability is entailed.

The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Bushes and Skull and Bonesmen have started wars for profit for over 100 years, and are positioned to make billions by making more wars. Their deeds have caused not just a few terrorist incidents, but a whole century worth of global and regional wars.

It is virtually certain that leaving these pirates of intelligence agencies and National Treasuries at large and in possession of waste sums of blood money will result in more and bigger wars. Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy warned of this. Since under the influence of these pirates the US dropped atomic bombs on civilians in Japan and in Iraq already and used depleted uranium in the former Yugoslavia, Iraq, and Afghanistan, there is no room for false assurance that they will not do it again given the risk of our annihilation from nuclear warfare.

Every country in the world has a duty to their citizens and to the future of their nation and the world to try these pirates of nations for their crimes against humanity.

Wars are started for profit. The profit is made illegally by in effect holding a gun to the head of the taxpayer and threatening to pull the trigger if they don’t hand over their money. That is, those planning the war have the media print propaganda; “The Nicaraguans are coming to kill you.” “The Panamians are coming to kill you under Noreiga.” “The Iraqis are going to use WMD against you under Saddam.” “The Irans are going to use a nuclear weapon against you if you don’t let us go to war against them.”

None of it was true, but it was a credible threat to the public because the US high officials lied and said it was and the public had no way of checking as the officials refused to provide the evidence on false claims of National Security.

This piracy of national agendas, this terrorism of the public, is a crime against humanity! It is far worse than the piracy of ships or aircraft or yelling Fire in a crowded movie theater. Millions and millions of people have died from allowing this crime of starting wars for profit to go unprosecuted.

When a person murders a single person to get their money, the law sentences them to 20 years to life. When a leader of a nation has stock in weapons or reconstruction or security companies that is a clear conflict of interest which should result in jail time because the lives of millions are threatened by this conflict of interest even before the lie to force the nation to war start.

Even though the Courts in the US were under the control of the US Supreme Court which was appointed by the Shadow Government, the Courts in other nations must have known that a serious conflict of interests was occurring in the US.

In Canada, the newspapers reported that had there been that kind of conflict of interests in Canada, those committing it would have been put in prison. The Courts of other Nations had a duty to try US officials for that conflict of interest as a war crime in the making. That is, it was virtually inevitable that war would follow and when the first talk of going to war occurred, the crime of that conflict of interest was no longer a potential crime but the pre-meditation to commit mass murder for profit.

When a person buys a life insurance policy on their wife and then circulates rumors that she is so bad that she should be killed, who is it who is so blind not to see that murder for profit has been pre-mediated. Yet, the world allowed the Bush and Cheney Administration with its ties to Carlyle, Halliburton, KBR, and oil companies to not just circulate rumors that it intended to go to war against former Bush, Sr. partner Saddam, but did not challenge the lies.

The first Bush, Jr. Secretary of Treasury, O’Neil, is quoted in the book The Price of Loyalty as saying that at Bush, Jr.’s first National Security Council Meeting in January 2001, the discussion was how to go to war in Iraq without even providing evidence that Saddam was bad.

In fact, the US government under Bush, Sr. sold Saddam biological and chemical weapons to use against the Iranians. Kissinger was quotes in former US Attorney General Ramsey Clark’s book The Fire This Time; US War Crimes in the Gulf as saying that he didn’t want either side to win in the Iraq-Iran war, he wished both sides to die in large numbers.

It seems to me that letting men intent on mass murder (as Kissinger as a follower of the Rockefeller eugenics family was) make policies in a State is the same as giving a murder a license to practice medicine. Not it is far worse as the people of Laos and Cambodia found out, not to mention those of Argentina and Chile under Operation Condor.

How many genocides around the world do the Rockefeller and Rothschild Families need to start before a court will try them for mass murder? The Kissingers, Bushes, Cheneys, and Clintons are their handy front men. But at the CIA it was clear who was giving the orders behind the scenes which made these genocidal policies which endured regardless of whether the Democrats or the Republicans were in office.

I have the unfortunate experience of having been an intelligence/sex slave to the Rockefeller Family and many of their downline, the Bushes, Clinton, Kissinger, Rove, McLaughlin, and others, so I know what they really think and do behind the scenes. Perhaps I should just right down who was appointed by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds to be “my Master” each year by way of introduction to this topic. I have started a file called “My Slavery to the New World Order of Satanists”.

Was it legal for anyone in the US to authorize the use of nuclear weapons? This is a very important question; does a government or a Commander-in-chief have the right to damage the DNA of the human race for at least 4.5 million years in an exponentially increasing fashion as the resultant radiation would? I assert that no one has the right to destroy the DNA of the human species, not even to protect their nation from genocide!

I believe that God can grant us the miracle of the restoration of the human DNA, but only if we sincerely resolve never to use radioactive weapons again! If we do not do that then, I believe the damage to the human DNA which is already in progress from the radiation we have released onto the surface of the planet is already not consistent with the survival of the human race.

Knowing the accuracy of my war forecasting abilities, the Pentagon’s Joint Chiefs of Staff [JCS] asked me to write a report in Summer 2004 on the consequences to the human race of the depleted uranium which had already been used up to that date. The results already , without the need for any accuracy in forecasting at all, are perfectly clear--defects in the DNA so severe as to make life on Earth a living Hell of disability, pain, and mental retardation. Only those people wanting to live without eyes, limbs, intelligence, and health need apply to be born in the future to this planet--unless we have a miracle from God.

The JCS wanted to know how soon the birth defects would affect people in the US, not just in Iraq. I said, “Go to the homes of the veterans of Gulf War number 1 in 1991 and you can see that you are too late in asking that question!”

They then wanted to know when their own families would have birth defects. I listed 3 men sitting at the conference table at that meeting with grandchildren or great grandchildren with damage to their DNA so severe as to impair their futures. Two of those men had not been to the Middle East at all, but they had lived on bases or commuted to the Pentagon where soldiers returning from the US wars came through.

The US is not decontaminating the returning soldiers, planes, and equipment. It is acting as if the problem does not exist. In truth there is no way to decontaminate when soldiers are living in the fallout, eating the dust with their food, and have the radiation incorporated into their bodies and their bones.

US officials are just ignoring the problem, not dealing with it intelligently. The only way to deal with it intelligently is to prevent it.

It was a war crime to use depleted uranium; there was no one on the planet who had a right to order its use! It is still being used in the war zones, including now in Pakistan, because the New World Order of Satanists wants to drastically reduce the population.

That was why they developed and used HIV as well. But as in the use of HIV they had high hopes that Africa would be left quickly free of people and they would have the resources.

David Rockefeller was upset that HIV took so long to kill people. He thought that HIV and depleted uranium were good solutions to over population; he was wrong. Each genocidal method causes more problems than it solves. Like destroying a village in Vietnam to save it from the Communists, depleted uranium destroys the future of humans on the planet supposedly to save it by having fewer people.

What good is having 500 million people on the planet when they are all deformed mentally retarded mutants? The JCS wanted to know when there would be no more intelligence regular humans left.

There is a mathematical puzzle which asks, “if you take any two people on the planet, how many people are there in the closest chain linking them by people having meet each other?” The answer is about 5.

It is relevant because the answer to connection by DNA is about 20. According to mathematical modeling in another 7 generations, most people would be deformed or mentally retarded and about 20 generation [less than 400 years], there would be no more normal people.

That was the answer I gave the JSC in Summer 2004. Much more depleted uranium has been used since then because the White House and Pentagon refused to see the Light of Day and kept on following the paths of Darkness.

Now the answer is that in 15 generations it is likely there will be no normal people left--even if they try to marry only healthy people. Dust travels. Planes travel. People travel. Even if you closed all the airports and did not let people travel across borders, it is too late. The Coalition of the Willing should have been called the Coalition of Those Willing to Have their DNA destroyed!

Even if all of those returned soldiers were killed, something that the Pentagon considered doing, the dust will still spread the radiation. The Middle East is prone to dreadful sand storms. This is not at all like in Japan where the radiation stayed in place and one could scrap off a layer of dirt to rebury the radiation. And the US did not even try to clean up the radiation.

Each round of depleted uranium looks like a metal rod the size of a thin cigar. But most of it atomizes into hot liquid and vapor when it is fired into something. It is not like you can just go in and pick it up in a rod again and get most of it. Only about 11% of it remains in pieces large enough to pick up.

That dust does not just travel 50 miles and then settle permanently down. It is constantly being kicked up and moved further away. If one had tried to clean it up in the first 2 days afterwards, you might have had a chance! The movement of people and equipment accounts for only 4.3% of the dispersal of the radiation! The US is adding much more than that amount every year.

Estimated Number of Generations until human DNA is unable to make intelligence normal people

Year

1945 115

Chernobyl 83

Bosnia 46

Kosovo 34

Afghanistan 2001 30

Afghanistan 2002 27

War Zones 2003 23

War Zones 2004 20

War Zones 2005 19

War Zones 2006 18

War Zones 2007 16

War Zones 2008 15


Unless there is a miracle or a competent cleanup! Any cleanup would have to start by ordering no more depleted uranium or nuclear weapons be used.

U.S. Government Plays The 'HAARP'

Author's Addiction Led Him To 'Angel's Doorstep' Where U.S. Government Plays The 'HAARP'
Is the secret government program based in Alaska changing the weather, altering our thinking patterns and set-up to cause a global nightmare??
18 May 2005 http://www.arcticbeacon.citymaker.com/articles/article/1518131/25963.htm
By Greg Szymanski
After years of fighting the "dark forces" in the world, Reno author and lecturer Jerry Smith has finally been diagnosed with an incurable addiction. The diagnosis has come after countless articles, lectures and books and after years of social activism, starting in the turbulent 60s.
Smith’s addiction isn’t gambling, boozing or anything else normally associated with the 60s or the nightclub town he lives in. But rather it is an insatiable appetite, an unstoppable desire to find answers to some of the world’s most complex and difficult questions.
After publishing his first article in 1969, Smith has dabbled in most everything labeled conspiratorial or controversial. He is the perfect definition of a "jack of all trades and a master of none," as nothing appears too far out of range for his type of unique exploratory and inquisitive mind.
Mention a conspiracy like JFK, Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City or 9/11 and Smith has probably written about it. Mention a political controversy like Watergate the neocon movement, globalization or nuclear proliferation and Smith has probably commented about it. Mention a scientific dilemma like chemical and biological warfare and Smith has lectured about it.
Even mention a UFO sighting and Smith probably knows about it, since he once headed up the UFO Museum in Reno in 1991-92.
Although he has no fancy titles or degrees following his name, Smith is the perfect example of the new "New Age Technological Renaissance Man," self-educated and self-taught, using his computer as a lightening rod to "touch all things possible and imaginable."
So besides all the high brow intellectual rhetoric, who is Jerry E. Smith and what has he accomplished?
"I am not a scientist, nor a technician -- I am a writer, a researcher, and occasionally an activist. I don't know how to build weapons, only how to put sentences and paragraphs together," said Smith from behind a mountain of paperwork at his home in Reno.
"I have spent my life reading and thinking about technology and how it has changed our society. As a youth I read voraciously, from wild science fiction novels to the ancient classics, to American history to global politics. But the books I really liked, and read over and over, were the ones that dealt with how societies came to grips with, or were destroyed by their science."
And whether America eventually will be destroyed by an "out of control science" unleashed by an "out of control" government is a tough question. Nevertheless it is a tough question that Smith chooses to tackle, as he presently is hard at work on an update to his 1998 book entitled HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy.
In fact, when the word harp is mentioned, most people think of angels. But Smith says this "HAARP" is anything but angelic, having the potential to one day destroy the planet.
The topic that now occupies Smith’s inquisitive mind is actually named "The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP)" and is the largest and most powerful Department of Defense (DOD) facility of its kind in the world.
Located in southeastern Alaska, HAARP consists of a gigantic field of antennas working as if it was one big antenna. When completed in 2007, it will be the world's largest radio broadcasting station with an effective radiated power of 3.6 billion watts, which is more than 72,000 times more powerful than the largest legal commercial radio station in the United States.
However, Smith and other researchers claim the government has no intention to compete with Rush Limbaugh or Air America as its plans are not even remotely intended for human ears. In fact, its purpose is to inject the high-powered radio frequency energy into a "spot" at the very top of the atmosphere, in a region called the ionosphere, a spot about 12 miles across, 2 miles deep, and about 50 to 90 miles up.
Trying to answer the $64,000 question concerning why the government wants to inject all that energy into the atmosphere, Smith said:
"The United States government, its military and many academics, say that it is a pure science research station, one intended to increase our understanding of the upper atmosphere, and nothing more. Detractors are not convinced.
"However, some researchers think HAARP is a prototype for a ground-based "Star Wars" weapons system. It may be an over-the-horizon type radar ... or it may exist to destroy incoming ICBMs ... or perhaps to fry out the electronics of enemy spy satellites ... or it might be used to disrupt enemy radio communications.
"The folks at HAARP deny any military connections, but that of course has led to much controversy, debate and claims of conspiracy and cover up."
And once the government begins "denying and lying," Smith said the possible uses for HAARP became even more strange and sinister.
"Many researchers have looked into what HAARP is really intended for - and some have come up with some very strange sounding things! Some think it will be used to control the weather. Others say it could be used to set off volcanoes, or trigger earthquakes," said Smith.
"Still others see its potential for "Wining the Hearts and Minds" of our enemies by beaming emotions or commands directly into their brains. And some few even speculate that it will be used by the New World Order to take over the world by projecting holographic images into the sky while beaming thoughts directly into our heads, telling us to accept the new "god" of their design. And still others think it is part of a planetary defense system to protect us from invading aliens from outer space. And there are even wilder ideas about what "they" want to do with HAARP!"
Smith said his new book entitled CHEMTRAILS, HAARP & WEATHER WARFARE: The Military's Plan to Draft Mother Nature, due to be out in 2006, updates the government’s progress on the Alaskan project, its change in management and anything new about its possible destructive nature uncovered since his last book.
"I began writing my 1998 book HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy with the intent to sort out truth from fiction. I quickly learned that HAARP was but the tip of a very nasty iceberg," said Smith. "I soon learned more about the down side of electromagnetic (radio frequency) technologies than I ever wanted to know. And that things are far worse in the Military-Industrial-Educational Complex than even I, as a "peacenik" from the '60s, imagined.
"My book became an examination of two major questions: what is the fundamental flaw in how we fund and conduct science, and how can a democracy defend itself from its own military and covert intelligence agencies?"
Asked about his biggest fears about HAARP, he added:
"Initially, my greatest fear was that HAARP would accidentally trigger mental or emotional dysfunction across a large portion of the planet, as HAARP is intended to bathe the world in extremely low frequency (ELF) radio waves at exactly the same frequency that the human brain works at.
"As I learned more about HAARP an entire Pandora's Box of potential dangerscame to view. Clearly, HAARP is a ground-based "Star Wars" weapons system.The Soviets objected to Star Wars (SDI) on the grounds that it would give the US First Strike capability. That has not changed, although the dynamicsof the Cold War has. HAARP still has the potential to destabilize international relations, only now with the Chinese, rather than the former Soviet Union."
And from an environment point of view, Smith said there is no end to the potential horrors of HAARP.
"Oddly enough, my greatest fear now is that HAARP might be exactly what theysay it is -- an experimental base from which clueless civilian scientists are manipulated into performing questionable experiments on vast planetary systems with unknown potential outcomes,," said Smith. "Its primary avowed purpose, stated most simply, is to find out if the atmosphere can be made into some kind of weapon; or if portions of it, such as the ionosphere, can be "tweaked" so as to advance military objectives. Common sense tells us that "weaponizing the atmosphere" could be a serious mistake -- even if it works. If we achieve this technology, how long will it be before one of our enemies gains it too? What happens when they go head to head in a war using geophysical weapons? Nukes are nice in comparison to the hell that could be unleashed."
Concerning whether HAARP, now in its initial stages, has already caused any noticeable damage, Smith had an interesting analysis.
"HAARP is a functioning ground-based "Star Wars" weapons system. It was successfully used against an incoming ICBM in 2003. The North Koreans, in pique over deadlocked talks, pitched a missile at the US. It was brought down, its Chinese warhead found in Alaska. Unfortunately, the space shuttle Columbia was reentering earth's atmosphere at the same time. Collateral damage, destruction by "friendly fire," all carefully covered up, which I will be working of finding the answers in a new book I have planned."
Besides HAARP, Smith’s impressive resume includes scores of articles, reviews and two non-fiction books. He is also putting the finishing touches on a book entitled Secrets of the Holy Lance: The Spear Of Destiny In History & Legend (2005), a project with co-author George Piccard, author of Liquid Conspiracy: JFK, LSD, the CIA, Area 51, AND UFOs (1999).
For more informative articles, go to www.arcticbeacon.com.

Could the HAARP Project be for Mind Control?

Could the HAARP Project be for Mind Control? By Nicholas Jones
nicholasjones99@yahoo.com  http://www.haarp.net/mindcontrol.htm  
 
Earth is wrapped in a donut shaped magnetic field. Circular lines of flux continuously descend into the North Pole and emerge from the South Pole. The ionosphere, an electromagnetic-wave conductor, 100 kms above the earth, consists of a layer of electrically charged particles acting as a shield from solar winds. Natural waves are related to the electrical activity in the atmosphere and are thought to be caused by multiple lightning storms. Collectively, these waves are called ‘The Schumann Resonance’, the current strongest at 7.8 Hz. These are quasi-standing extremely low frequency (ELF) waves that naturally exist in the earth’s ‘electromagnetic’ cavity, the space between the ground and the ionosphere. These ‘earth brainwaves’ are identical to the spectrum of our brainwaves.
                               (1 hertz = 1 cycle per second, 1 Khz = 1000, 1 Mhz =1 million. A 1
                               Hertz wave is 186,000 miles long, 10 Hz is 18,600 miles. Radio-waves
                               move at the speed of light.)
The Creator designed living beings to resonate to this natural frequency pulsation in order to evolve harmoniously. The ionosphere is being manipulated by US govt. scientists using an Alaskan transmitter called HAARP, (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which sends focused radiated power to heat up sections of the ionosphere, which bounces power down again. ELF waves from HAARP when targeted on areas can weather-engineer and create mood changes affecting millions. The intended wattage is 1,700 billion watts of power. A former govt. insider deduced they want to flip the world upside down. 64 elements in the ground modulate, with variation, the geomagnetic waves naturally coming from the ground.
The ‘earth’s natural brain rhythm’ above is balanced with these. These are the same minerals as the red blood corpuscles. There is a relation between the blood and geomagnetic waves. An imbalance between Schumann and geomagnetic waves disrupts biorhythms. These natural geomagnetic waves are being replaced by artificially created very low frequency (VLF) ground waves coming from GWEN Towers.
GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) transmitters placed 200 miles apart across the USA allow specific frequencies to be tailored to the geomagnetic-field strength in each area, allowing the magnetic field to be altered. They operate in the VLF range, with transmissions between VLF 150 and 175 KHz. They also emit UHF waves of 225 - 400 MHz. The VLF signals travel by waves that hug the ground rather than radiating into the atmosphere. A GWEN station transmits circularly up to 300 miles, the signal dropping off sharply with distance. The entire GWEN system consists of, (depending on source of data), from 58 to an intended 300 transmitters spread across the USA, each with a tower 299-500 ft high. 300 ft copper wires in spoke like fashion fan out from the base of the system underground, interacting with the earth like a thin shelled conductor, radiating radio wave energy for very long distances through the ground.
USA bathes in this magnetic field which rises to 500 ft, even going down to basements, so everyone is mind-controlled. The whole artificial ground-wave spreads out over USA like a web. It is easier to mind-control and hypnotize people who are bathed in an artificial electromagnetic-wave. (Covering the entire floor with aluminum and buying a CET cylinder from Nordic Living Water Systems helps.) GWEN transmitters have many different functions including controlling the weather, mind, behavior and mood control.
These work in conjunction with HAARP and the Russian Woodpecker transmitter, similar to HAARP. The Russians openly market a small version of their weather-engineering system called Elate, which can fine-tune weather patterns over a 200 mile area and have the same range as the GWEN unit. One operates at Moscow airport. The GWEN Towers shoot enormous bursts of energy into the atmosphere in conjuction with HAARP. The website www.cuttingedge.org  wrote an expose of how the major floods of the Mid-West USA occurred in 1993.
Invisible enormous rivers of water, consisting of vapors that flow, move towards the poles in the lower atmosphere. They rival the flow of the Amazon River and are 420 to 480 miles wide and up to 4,800 miles long. They are 1.9 miles above the earth and have volumes of 340 lbs of water per second. There are 5 atmospheric rivers in each Hemisphere. A massive flood can be created by damming up one of these massive vapor rivers, causing huge amounts of rainfall to be dumped.
The GWEN Towers positioned along the areas north of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers were turned on for 40 days and 40 nights, probably mocking the Flood of Genesis. (This was in conjunction with HAARP, that creates a river of electricity flowing thousands of miles through the sky and down to the polar ice-cap, manipulating the jet-stream , like The Woodpecker.) These rivers flooded, causing agricultural losses of $12-15 billion. HAARP produces earthquakes by focusing on the fault lines. GWEN Towers are on the fault lines and volcanic areas of the Pacific Northeast.
In 1963 Dr Robert Becker explored effects of external magnetic-fields on brainwaves showing a relationship between psychiatric admissions and solar magnetic storms. He exposed volunteers to pulsed magnetic-fields similar to magnetic-storms, and found a similar response. US 60 Hz electric power ELF waves vibrate at the same frequency as the human brain. UK 50 Hz electricity emissions depress the thyroid.
Dr Andrija Puharich in the 50’s/60’s, found clairvoyant’s brainwaves became 8 Hz when their powers were operative. He saw an Indian Yogi in 1956 controlling his brainwaves, deliberately shifting his consciousness from one level to another. Puharich trained people with bio-feedback to do this consciously, making 8 Hz waves. A healer made 8 Hz waves pass into a patient, healing their heart trouble, her brain emitting 8 Hz . One person emitting a certain frequency can make another also resonate to the same frequency.
Our brains are extremely vulnerable to any technology which sends out ELF waves, because they immediately start resonating to the outside signal by a kind of tuning-fork effect. Puharich experimented discovering 7.83 Hz (earth’s pulse rate) made a person ‘feel good’ producing an altered-state. 10.80 Hz causes riotious behaviour and 6.6 Hz causes depression. Puharich made ELF waves change RNA and DNA, breaking hydrogen bonds to make a person have a higher vibratory rate. He wanted to go beyond the psychic 8 Hz brainwave and attract psi phenomena. James Hurtak, who once worked for Puharich, also wrote in his book The Keys of Enoch that ultra-violet caused hydrogen bonds to break and this raised the vibratory rate.
Puharich presented the mental effects of ELF waves to military leaders but they would not believe him. He gave this information to certain dignitaries of other Western nations. The US govt burned down his home in New York to shut him up and he fled to Mexico. However Russians discovered which ELF frequencies did what to the human brain and began zapping the US Embassy in Moscow on 4 July 1976 with electromagnetic-waves, varying the signal, including focusing on 10 Hz. (10 Hz puts people into a hypnotic state, Russians and North Koreans use this in portable mind-control machines to extract confessions.Found also in an American church to help the congregation believe!) This Russian “Woodpecker” signal was traveling across the world from a transmitter near Kiev. The US Air Force identified 5 different frequencies in this compound harmonic Woodpecker was sending through the earth and atmosphere. Nikola Tesla revealed in 1901 power could be transmitted through the ground using ELF waves. Nothing stops or weakens these signals. The Russians retrieved Tesla’s papers when they were returned to Yugoslavia after his death.