.

.
Library of Professor Richard A. Macksey in Baltimore

POSTS BY SUBJECT

Labels

Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Giulio Meotti : Europe's Cities Absorb Sharia Law

  • London Mayor Sadiq Khan banned advertisements that promote "unrealistic expectations of women's body image and health". Now Berlin is planning to ban images in which women are portrayed as "beautiful but weak, hysterical, dumb, crazy, naive, or ruled by their emotions". Tagesspiegel's Harald Martenstein said the policy "could have been adopted from the Taliban manifesto".
  • The irony is that this wave of morality and "virtue" is coming from cities governed by uninhibited leftist politicians, who for years campaigned for sexual liberation. It is now a "feminist" talking point to advocate sharia policy.
  • To paraphrase the American writer Daniel Greenfield, the irony of women celebrating their own suppression is both heartbreaking and stupefying.
Within days after the Islamic State conquered the city of Sirte in Libya two years ago, enormous billboards appeared in the Islamist stronghold warning women they must wear baggy robes that cover their entire bodies, and no perfume. These "sharia stipulations for hijab" included wearing dense material and a robe that does not "resemble the attire of unbelievers".

Two years later, Europe's three most important cities -- London, Paris and Berlin -- are adopting the same sharia trend.

Paris has said au revoir to "sexist" ads on public billboards. The Paris city council announced its ban after the Socialist Mayor Anne Hidalgo said the move meant that Paris was "leading the way" in the fight against sexism. London Mayor Sadiq Khan also banned advertisements that promote "unrealistic expectations of women's body image and health". Now Berlin is planning to ban images in which women are portrayed as "beautiful but weak, hysterical, dumb, crazy, naive, or ruled by their emotions". Der Tagesspiegel's Harald Martenstein said the policy "could have been adopted from the Taliban manifesto".

The irony is that this wave of morality and "virtue" is coming from cities governed by uninhibited leftist politicians, who for years campaigned for sexual liberation.

There is a reason for this grotesque campaign banning these images. These cities host significant Muslim populations; and politicians -- the same who frantically are enacting mandatory multiculturalism -- want to please "Islam". It is now a "feminist" talking point to advocate sharia policy, as does Linda Sarsour. The result is that, today, few feminists dare to criticize Islam.

It is happening everywhere. Dutch municipalities are "advising" their employees to not wear mini-skirts. There are women-only hours at Swedish swimming pools.

 German schools are sending letters to parents asking children to avoid wearing "revealing clothes".

The first to suggest calling for a ban on posters or advertisements that "reduce women or men to sexual objects" was German Justice Minister Heiko Maas, a Social Democrat.

"To demand the veiling of women or taming of men," said Free Democratic Party leader Christian Lindner, "is something known among radical Islamic religious leaders, but not from the German minister of justice."

In 1969, Germany was overwhelmed by a debate on introducing into schools the "Sexualkundeatlas", an "atlas" of sexual science. Now the effort is to desexualize German society. The newspaper Die Welt commented:
"Thanks to Justice Minister Heiko Maas we finally know why on New Year's Eve, at Cologne Central Station, about a thousand women were victims of sexual violence: because of sexist advertising. Too many eroticized models, too much naked skin on our billboards, too many erotic mouths, too many miniskirts in fashion magazines, too many wiggling rear-ends and chubby breasts in television spots. It is another step in the direction of a 'submission'".
Instead of nipples and buttocks, Die Welt concludes, "should we urge the use of burqa or veil, as Mrs. Erdogan does?"

The same German élites who suggest banning "sexist" billboards censored the crude details of the mass sexual assaults in Cologne. Meanwhile, a liberal Berlin mosque, which banned burqas and opened its door to gays and to unveiled women, is now under police protection after threats from Muslim supremacists.

Europe's élites have adopted a double standard: they are proud to host an exhibit of a Christian crucifix submerged in urine, but quickly capitulate to Muslim demands to censor cartoons of the Islamic Prophet Mohammed. 
The Italian authorities went to great efforts to spare Iran's President Hassan Rouhani a view of nudity on ancient sculptures in the Capitoline Museums of Rome.

The Western public appears fascinated by Islamic veils. Ismail Sacranie, a founder of Modestly Active, the manufacturer that designs burkinis, told the New York Times that 35% of their clients are non-Muslim. Aheda Zanetti, a Lebanese woman living in Australia who invented the burkini, claims that 40% of her sales are to non-Muslim women.
The Western public, which has been romanticizing Islam, is apparently absorbing the pieties of Islamic law.  
The Spectator called it "a new puritanism" and "why some feminists make common cause with Islam".

To paraphrase the American writer Daniel Greenfield,
the irony of women celebrating their own suppression is both heartbreaking and stupefying.

Europe might soon have to apologize to the Mayor of Cologne, Henriette Reker. She was criticized -- denounced -- for advising women to keep "at an arm's length" from strangers to avoid sexual harassment.

If the West keeps on betraying the democratic value of individual freedom on which Western civilization is based, Islamic fundamentalists, like those who imposed burqas on Libyan women, will start imposing them on Western women. 
They may even begin with those feminist élites who first created the sexual revolution to emancipate women in the 1960s, and who are now infatuated with an obscurantist garment that hides women in a portable prison.


If the West keeps betraying the democratic value of individual freedom, Islamic fundamentalists, like those who imposed burqas on Libyan women, will do the same to Western women. (Photo by Alexander Hassenstein/Getty Images)

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

The Irish Savant : The Strange Death of Europe




The Strange Myopia of Douglas Murray

From Amazon: "The Strange Death of Europe is a highly personal account of a continent and culture caught in the act of suicide. Declining birth-rates, mass immigration and cultivated self-distrust and self-hatred have come together to make Europeans unable to argue for themselves and incapable of resisting their own comprehensive change as a society. This book is not only an analysis of demographic and political realities, but also an eyewitness account of a continent in self-destruct mode. It includes reporting from across the entire continent, from the places where migrants land to the places they end up, from the people who appear to welcome them in to the places which cannot accept them."

I just finished reading it and that summary is, for Amazon, pretty fair.

The author traces in great detail and with increasing horror the stunning scale and speed of the demographic and social transformation besetting Europe. He rips into politicians and the media for their duplicitous role in this transformation. He challenges 'liberals' and feminists on their inherently nonsensical and hypocritical support for immigrants who bring their illiberal and anti-feminine practises with them. He devotes a full chapter to demolishing political correctness, its bogus rationalisations, intolerance and falsification of history, and cleverly shows how these pathologies lead to authorities turning a blind eye to multiple instances of Muslim child-abuse. He traces PC corruption from the highest levels of national Government to local government, the police, courts and social services agencies. I particularly like the way he demolishes, first, the fallacy that Britain 'has always been a nation of immigrants' and second the idea that we need immigrants because European women aren't having enough children, identifying 
more child-friendly social and economic policies and not more Muslim head-choppers as the solution.

All of this is powerful stuff, deeply researched and written with style. However there are two areas in which the book disappoints: First, explanations for how Europe's death came about and second his unqualified despair about the future. For this particular coroner 'cause of death' was suicide. Not murder.  “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.” And why is Europe deeply weighed down with guilt? Because.....well... Christianity. And the Holocau$t™.  The Jewish role, which was and remains central, is ignored apart from his shock at the part payed by European Jewish organisations in supporting the invasion. Shock because the invaders will not be pro-Jewish! (I took Fred Reed to task for a similar evasion some time ago.)

Does Douglas really not 'get it' about the Jews or is he just being cute? I suspect the latter. First because anybody taking even a cursory analysis of the subject couldn't fail to see it and second because Murray himself was pretty explicit in an article with the Jewish Chronicle. While taking care to proclaim his philo-semitism (and in a this-hurts-me-more-than-you tone) he nonetheless makes some hard points. Points which indicate that he does in fact 'get it'. He notes - sadly, he conveys - how phrases like ''one law for the Jews, another for the rest of us'', ''It's all very well for the Jews. They have Israel where only Jews can go and all the time they're destroying our own religious and racial identity in Europe'' and 'rootless cosmopolitans' are coming back into vogue. If nothing else this might give the nation-wreckers a few sleepless nights.

The only other complaint I have lies in his lack of hope, or any form of program to counter the 'strange death'. But I suppose his stated role has been to catalogue that death and he's done a hell of a good job on that. Will it make much difference? Well the book has sold and continues to sell in huge numbers on both sides of the Atlantic. Any non-awake reader will surely be jolted by its analysis and conclusions. Which is good. But bear in mind that Thilo Sarrazin did the same thing for Germany in books avidly read by millions of Germans. Who then went on to give Angela Merkel an even bigger share of their vote.

Maybe Murray's pessimism is justified after all.....

The Irish Savant : 911 : Lucky Larry Silverstein: The luckiest man alive




 

 

 

 

 

Lucky Larry Silverstein: The luckiest man alive

They say it’s better to be born lucky than, eh, something or other. If so, Larry Silverstein is your man. What a lucky guy! No wonder he’s smiling. Consider this.
 Every, every, every morning Larry had breakfast with his son and daughter at the Window On The World restaurant on the top floor of the World Trade Center. Except for the morning of September 11, 2001. 
Boy, wasn’t that luck?

And where was he on that day? Here you can listen to him explain. “Eh, I, um, cough, er, ahem, cough, I was at the dermatologist, mumble, mumble”. What a lucky guy. 
But what about his unfortunate children, incinerated in the carnage of that day? Well, he’s lucky again! His son was, eh, somewhere else that morning. The first time in months that he wasn’t at the WTC. 
But the poor daughter then? More luck! She too was, ahem, somewhere else that morning. Like the son, missing for the first time in months.

But Larry’s luck didn’t end there. You see, when Larry bought the WTC buildings, many people thought he was crazy. The owners were finding it difficult to get tenants, and faced a multi-billion-dollar asbestos-removal court order. Some figures put the bill so high that knocking them would have been more economical. Especially when tenants were so hard to come by.

Larry was struggling. But he got lucky yet again! Yes sirree! You see, in an act of breathtaking perspicacity and foresight, he insured the buildings for billions……..in the event of their being destroyed by terrorist attack. How the insurers must have laughed as they lodged his premium. But then, literally out of the blue, a few weeks later, the unimaginable happened. The buildings were destroyed by terrorists, and Larry collected his payout. All his problems solved, including the tricky asbestos one.

But there’s more! In a TV interview he said that he gave the order to ‘pull’ the WTC 7 building because of the danger to fire fighters. (There were in fact none in the building, just some highly incriminating documents relating to Enron and other sensitive issues). Now it normally takes between four and six weeks to rig such a building for demolition, but somehow Larry was able to magically pull it off in about five minutes.

Is that luck or what?

And his luck continues to this day. Given what I've described above, some begrudgers, most notably the insurance companies and the MSM’s investigative journalists (is that an oxymoron?) might be expected to raise awkward questions. But happily, not a bit of it! It all went swimmingly. Money was paid over, no awkward questions asked.  And a few weeks ago, on the tenth anniversary of the terrible event, there was Larry on the podium, an honoured guest, as those assembled commemorated the tragedy and mourned the victims.

Larry Silverstein, the luckiest man alive. Seven billion the richer, I'm sure he’ll pass some of it on to a needy and so helpful Israel.

The Irish Savant : Are we beaten? Seriously




Are we beaten? Seriously

There's been some great input and ideas in recent threads as to how White Nationalists can fight back and hopefully avoid our destruction. A load of practical, well thought-out measures, and I intend to collate it all and present in a separate post shortly.  But here I raise again the question I did a week or two ago:  Is it too late?

“Just a few decades ago whites were a confident race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people, ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests there has been something more than natural change.”
Whites have been browbeaten into seeing  'Whiteness’ as inherently wicked. To give you one example, my daughter-in-law mentioned to her friends that she was looking forward to having a lovely blonde baby (both she and my son are blonde/fair).  She was severely castigated by them for her ‘racism’.  Isn't it some achievement when hoping to have kids like yourselves can seem to be unnatural. Any ethnic group who can get another ethnic group to think like that must be almost unstoppable.
A professor friend at a leading American University tells me that Jewish faculty and admin staff now openly admit that they want to minimise the White presence at  the institution. The point is, they’re openly saying this. That’s the level of confidence. It’s some achievement to get the majority ethnic group, the one that created the very institutions from which you’re now driving them, to accept their expulsion and disempowerment almost without demur. Any people who can get another people to think like that must be almost unstoppable.

Quite simply, Jews have succeeded – spectacularly -  in getting Whites to accept their Narrative. That, to my mind, was never the case in the past, when Jews were routinely judged by facts on the ground, aided by the Christ-killer meme. Today they’re almost impervious to criticism (‘don’t hit me with the Holocaust in my arms’).
It’s a truly awesome accomplishment.  They’ve fully capitalised on all their own strengths – and all of White weaknesses. They’ve bamboozled us into being literally our own worst enemies. Again, it’s an awesome accomplishment.  
And this brings me to the painful question that’s the basis of this post (and it’s not a rhetorical question): Should we just acknowledge that a superior race has bested us, and will continue to best us, in the same way that Whites will always best Blacks? Jews have significantly higher IQ levels than do we, and they ally that to a level of cohesion, tenacity and ethnic ruthlessness that Whites don’t even come close to matching. Should we just accept it and make the best of it?
You see, 95% of the public exist in the Matrix.  And here’s the big problem. There’s no simple, easy or cheap way to even make them aware that they are in the Matrix. The political system, courts, conventional media are all totally inaccessible to us. And to fully understand the magnitude of the damage done takes many hours of study and research. How many of the stupefied brain-dead zombies will give up their MSM-based prolefeed for that?
Each nation, Rosenzweig argued, knows, even if unconsciously, that some day other peoples will occupy their lands, and their language and culture will be interred in dusty books. Who now remembers the Lusitani, the Illyrians, the Sicani, the Quadians, Sarmatians, Alans, Gepidians, Herulians? Yet the Jews have existed for well over 3,000 years, and Hebrew is the only language West of the Indus that is spoken today more or less as it was spoken 3,000 years ago. A nation of slaves. And yes, they have come back to Israel.  It’s almost enough to make you believe in the Bible! And is it the Bible that says the Devil’s greatest achievement is to convince people that he doesn’t exist?  I go along with that - whoever said it - because it reflects the essence of our problem.

I acknowledge I'm in gloomy form tonight.  Help me feel a bit more optimistic. As Gerry Rafferty sang, "when you wake up it's a new morning, sun is shining, it's a new dawning".
Help me, Bono.......