CHRISTOFER BOLLYN
Who is the Mystery Telecom in the Iowa Caucus?
February 1, 2012
I have
made several calls to the Republican Party of Iowa in the past
few weeks asking about the name of the mystery "telecom" that was
involved in the January 3 caucus. Today, I spoke with Ryan Gough,
organization director of the party. Once again I asked Gough if he
could tell me the name of the telecom involved in the caucus. He asked
me to hold on "a second" and went to meet with his boss, I assume.
After
a few minutes Gough returned and told me that they would not be
releasing the name of the company that was involved in the tally. I
asked him why not and he simply said that they would not provide that
information - now or in the future. I then asked him if the company was
Voxeo and he claimed to know nothing about Voxeo. Voxeo is the
Israeli-linked telecom company that was involved in the
flawed Democratic caucuses of Iowa in 2004 and 2008.
Why
is the GOP of Iowa hiding the name of the company that helped transmit
the data on January 3? I suspect that the mystery "telecom" was the
weak link by which the data was manipulated. There is no reason that
the GOP of Iowa should be able to keep the identity of the company
secret. I hope there are people in Iowa or in the Ron Paul campaign who
might know the identity of this mystery company and pass it along to
me. I have contacted the Des Moines Register and hope they can help. Because the GOP of Iowa is a political party this information cannot be obtained through a FOIA.
The Criminal Plot to Stop Ron Paul
Updated January 30, 2012
Added material on criminal investigation of Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist "billionaire" behind Newt Gingrich.
Added material on criminal investigation of Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist "billionaire" behind Newt Gingrich.
THE CRIMINAL FUNDING OF NEWT GINGRICH - The casino company run by Sheldon Adelson (left), the principal financial backer of Newt Gingrich's presidential bid, has been under criminal investigation for the last year by the Department of Justice and the Securities Exchange Commission for alleged bribery of foreign officials, according to corporate documents.
- "Bribes, Chinese Mob Ties Alleged at Casino of Gingrich Money Man" , ABC News, 27 January 2012
20 January 2012 - Ron Paul speaks at a rally in Greenville, S.C. the day before the primary. Paul, who has energized the Republican party and the youth vote, drew a large crowd of several hundred despite heavy rain and frigid temperatures, according to the AP. Newt Gingrich, on the other hand, had to cancel a major campaign stop in Charleston because nobody came. With so little popular support how could Gingrich have possibly won the South Carolina primary? Is this yet another case of vote fraud by electronic voting machines? Photo: The Washington Post
But, now, how on earth could Newt Gingrich win the South Carolina primary when the day before the vote he had to cancel a major campaign stop because of lack of attendance?
- "There's something very odd about GOP primary pre-polling and vote" by Eric Blair, 22 January 2012
I just found your site and read your book ( Solving 9/11 )... As I was reading your book I was struck how the Zionists must hate Ron Paul. This would explain why he faces such intense media bias. The other thought I had was that his proximity to winning the White House is directly proportional to his assassination.
- C.H. in Illinois
- "There's something very odd about GOP primary pre-polling and vote" by Eric Blair, 22 January 2012
I just found your site and read your book ( Solving 9/11 )... As I was reading your book I was struck how the Zionists must hate Ron Paul. This would explain why he faces such intense media bias. The other thought I had was that his proximity to winning the White House is directly proportional to his assassination.
- C.H. in Illinois
South Carolinians voting on ES&S voting machines in the presidential primary on January 21, 2012. According to the tally produced by the privately-owned voting machine company ES&S, Ron Paul came in last place behind three Big Government Zionist-funded candidates who support war against Iran. Surprise, surprise.
Ron
Paul, a popular Southern conservative who supports states' rights,
supposedly came in fourth place in the South Carolina Republican primary
on Saturday, January 21. The winner, according to the tally produced
by the privately-owned voting machine company ES&S, was Newt
Gingrich. Gingrich is supported by Sheldon Adelson, the Zionist casino
billionaire who supports the most extreme hard-liners in the right-wing
Likud in Israel.
Adelson also finances the Lubavitcher cult, according to a 2003 report in Executive Intelligence Review which explains how "the Lubavitchers operate a right-wing political and dirty-money empire from Russia to New York's diamond district, to Israel."
Adelson also finances the Lubavitcher cult, according to a 2003 report in Executive Intelligence Review which explains how "the Lubavitchers operate a right-wing political and dirty-money empire from Russia to New York's diamond district, to Israel."
Sheldon Adelson (left) is the hard-line Zionist billionaire who is bankrolling the Gingrich campaign. Here Adelson, a global casino owner, talks with the Israeli president Shimon Peres.
In
recent years Gingrich has received at least $17 million in political
contributions from Adelson and his Israeli wife, Miriam, including $10
million that went to a “super PAC” supporting him in January
2012. Adelson made an initial $5 million contribution to Winning Our
Future, a pro-Gingrich super PAC, shortly before the South Carolina
primary. In an article entitled "The Man Behind Gingrich’s Money", the New York Times reported that Adelson's support was "pivotal in Mr. Gingrich’s victory" in South Carolina. The same article
from 28 January 2012 reported that Adelson has frequently lent his
Gulfstream jet to Gingrich for cross-country trips, according to
a former Gingrich adviser.
The Gingrich campaign received a $5 million donation from Sheldon Adelson the week before he "won" the South Carolina primary. Gingrich calls the indigenous Palestinian population an "invented" people and supports Israel's right to attack Iran as "self defense". Gingrich told CNN he would help Israel attack Iran and would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem on his first day in office by executive order. These are the hard-line positions Adelson is paying Gingrich to espouse.
The Gingrich campaign received a $5 million donation from Sheldon Adelson the week before he "won" the South Carolina primary. Gingrich calls the indigenous Palestinian population an "invented" people and supports Israel's right to attack Iran as "self defense". Gingrich told CNN he would help Israel attack Iran and would move the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem on his first day in office by executive order. These are the hard-line positions Adelson is paying Gingrich to espouse.
"Adelson uses his money to abuse or anoint Israeli prime ministers and American presidents (Gingrich versus Obama)." Source - "Is Gingrich’s Hard Line on Palestine Paid for by Sheldon Adelson?"
Las Vegas casino owner Sheldon Adelson (left) is a close friend and supporter of Benjamin Netanyahu of the right-wing Likud. Netanyahu is one of the suspected planners of the false-flag terror attacks of 9/11 and a friend of Newt Gingrich.
THE ZIONIST PLOT TO STOP RON PAUL
Mitt
Romney is supported by the Crown family of Chicago, a Zionist family
that is closely connected to Israeli military intelligence. Newt
Gingrich, on the other hand, is supported by Sheldon Adelson, a Zionist
billionaire who works closely with the same people. Are these different
factions or is this a Zionist plot that has the same goal?
The
Zionist strategy is to stop the very popular conservative Ron Paul.
Because there is obviously no candidate that can beat Paul in popularity
or on the issues, the Zionists are supporting a slew of
venal candidates in order to steal as many votes as possible from Paul.
These candidates are essentially a gang of Zionist-funded candidates
who form the anti-Paul coalition. Using privately-owned and controlled
electronic voting systems like ES&S, the South Carolina primary
shows how the Zionists plan to block Ron Paul from being the Republican
nominee.
From
this event, one can state as fact – not theory, that Israel and its
supporters in the US are actively working to derail Ron Paul’s race
towards the GOP nomination, and the Presidency. This fact alone, should
be cause for alarm from even the most moderate of public corridors.
Should a foreign country, in this case Israel, be allowed to buy a
significant influence through the media in American democratic
elections? Should candidates be allowed to accept donations – even
indirectly, from foreign interest PACs or agents thereof, thus creating a
serious conflict of interest, and threat to national security?
- "Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul" , by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012
- "Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul" , by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012
WHO STOLE THE IOWA CAUCUS?
After two weeks, the Republican Party of Iowa released its certified tally of the January 3 caucus. The certified final tally released on January 18 indicates that Mitt Romney did not win the Iowa caucus and that the results had been manipulated to give Romney the important first victory. The scale of the fraud in the Iowa caucus is so large that it suggests that there was a hidden hand manipulating the data from across the state as it was sent to party headquarters to give the victory to Romney. This suggests that the people behind Romney are likely to be the people behind the vote fraud, i.e. Lester Crown, Israeli intelligence, and the Zionist Fifth Column in the United States.
I spoke to Ryan Gough, the 24-year-old Organization Director for the Republican Party of Iowa on January 20. I asked him how there could be so many mistakes in so many precincts. The Des Moines Register, for example, reported that "typographical errors in tabulations" for two Fayette County precincts resulted in an inflated vote for Romney, who was initially reported to have carried the county by 67 votes. The final count showed Santorum carrying the county by 36 votes. Romney was reported to have won the caucus by only 8 votes on January 3. This was false.
After two weeks, the Republican Party of Iowa released its certified tally of the January 3 caucus. The certified final tally released on January 18 indicates that Mitt Romney did not win the Iowa caucus and that the results had been manipulated to give Romney the important first victory. The scale of the fraud in the Iowa caucus is so large that it suggests that there was a hidden hand manipulating the data from across the state as it was sent to party headquarters to give the victory to Romney. This suggests that the people behind Romney are likely to be the people behind the vote fraud, i.e. Lester Crown, Israeli intelligence, and the Zionist Fifth Column in the United States.
I spoke to Ryan Gough, the 24-year-old Organization Director for the Republican Party of Iowa on January 20. I asked him how there could be so many mistakes in so many precincts. The Des Moines Register, for example, reported that "typographical errors in tabulations" for two Fayette County precincts resulted in an inflated vote for Romney, who was initially reported to have carried the county by 67 votes. The final count showed Santorum carrying the county by 36 votes. Romney was reported to have won the caucus by only 8 votes on January 3. This was false.
There were
similar problems in 131 precincts with double-digit errors in 51
precincts. In spite of the wrong candidate having been declared the
winner, Gough defended the caucus, which he called a "volunteer-driven
process" in which typographical errors had occurred across the state to
benefit Mitt Romney. I don't buy it.
I reminded Gough that we had spoken a week before the primary and that he had told me that the way in which that precincts would communicate the results to caucus headquarters in Des Moines was being kept secret for security purposes. Now that the caucus was over, I asked, could he tell me how this was done. Gough said that a phone and computer system had been used but he had not gone into detail. When I asked if the telephonic system had been voice-to-voice, he said it was.
I reminded Gough that we had spoken a week before the primary and that he had told me that the way in which that precincts would communicate the results to caucus headquarters in Des Moines was being kept secret for security purposes. Now that the caucus was over, I asked, could he tell me how this was done. Gough said that a phone and computer system had been used but he had not gone into detail. When I asked if the telephonic system had been voice-to-voice, he said it was.
MYSTERY TELECOM
I
then asked Gough if any outside agency had been involved in the tally
of the results on January 3. He asked me what I meant and I told him
that the Democratic Party of Iowa had used a telephonic tally system
based in Florida called Voxeo in 2004 and 2008. I had been told by
Nicole Sizemore of the GOP of Iowa that no outside agency would
be involved in the tally, I told Gough.
Yes,
Gough said, there was an outside "telecom" involved in the tally,
although he said he could not reveal the name of the company. This
"telecom" is the most likely culprit behind the fraudulent tally in
the Iowa caucus. I am seeking information from people who were
involved in the caucus to find the identity of this mysterious "telecom"
that gave Romney the first, but fraudulent victory on January 3. As
the rest of the primaries will use even less verifiable electronic
voting machine systems, solving what happened in the Iowa caucus is
important because it could expose the criminals who steal our elections.
THE IOWA CAUCUS WAS STOLEN - ROMNEY DID NOT WIN
GOP
officials discovered double-digit errors in 51 of those certified
precincts when they compared what was reported on caucus night with the
official Form E documents signed by precinct volunteers. Eleven
precincts had errors of 50 or more votes.
- Des Moines Register, 19 January 2012
“The one thing that we can’t say is, we can’t certify every precinct in the state."
- Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn, 19 January 2012
- Des Moines Register, 19 January 2012
“The one thing that we can’t say is, we can’t certify every precinct in the state."
- Iowa GOP Chairman Matt Strawn, 19 January 2012
When
I began writing this article, just after Christmas, I was simply going
to predict that Mitt Romney would win the Iowa primary by vote fraud,
just like Obama and John Kerry had won the Democratic state polls of
2008 and 2004. My dire and pessimistic prediction was based solely on
the fact that Romney was being supported by the high-level Zionist
family of Lester Crown of Chicago. These are people who steal
elections, I thought, and they will find a way for Romney to win the
crucial first caucus - one way or another.
I repeatedly queried three different people at the Republican Party of Iowa about how the results would be tallied and after hearing that they would not use an outside contractor to count the votes, decided to qualify my dismal prediction by giving them the benefit of the doubt. I didn't want to be a bearer of bad news so I wrote this (in the article below):
I repeatedly queried three different people at the Republican Party of Iowa about how the results would be tallied and after hearing that they would not use an outside contractor to count the votes, decided to qualify my dismal prediction by giving them the benefit of the doubt. I didn't want to be a bearer of bad news so I wrote this (in the article below):
Mitt
Romney would most likely win the caucus if the Republican Party of
Iowa were to tally the caucus results using the dodgy telephonic tally
system (Voxeo) used by the Iowa Democrats in 2004 and 2008. But after
having intensively queried the Republican Party of Iowa about how the
results will be tallied it seems to me that the Republican Party of Iowa
will be tallying the results themselves in Des Moines... Let's hope Ron
Paul wins Iowa in a truly honest and transparent caucus on January 3.
We certainly don't need anymore illegal Zionist wars for profit and the
people of Iowa know that as well as anyone.
Today, two weeks and three days after Romney was declared the winner in Iowa, the certified final tally
from the Republican Party of Iowa shows that he did NOT win the caucus
at all. The caucus process and tally were completely messed up and,
according to the final, but still seriously flawed results, Rick
Santorum reportedly won the caucus. There is now very clear evidence of
serious vote fraud in the Iowa caucus. This cannot be simply dismissed
as human error. This was criminal vote fraud that cheated the entire
nation. The people involved in this case of egregious vote fraud must
be investigated and prosecuted.
VOTE FRAUD IN AT LEAST 131 PRECINCTS
Here are the key extracts from the Washington Post article of 19 January 2012:
Rick
Santorum won the Iowa caucuses Thursday — 16 days after the last vote
was cast — when the state Republican Party said a final count showed him
34 votes ahead of Mitt Romney.
Santorum’s strange, belated victory also served to embarrass the Iowa GOP — which had to admit that it had misallocated some votes, and simply lost some others, in a razor’s-edge election where every vote mattered.
It also cast an unflattering light on the old-fashioned and convoluted system that the party uses to collect and count caucus votes.
“It should be like a fine Swiss watch,” said Iowa State political science professor Steffen Schmidt. “It’s really more like a sundial.” He said the system used by Iowa Democrats was not significantly better.
In fact, Iowa Republican leaders seemed to cast doubt on their own results, saying Thursday that it was hard to declare a “winner” without knowing what happened in those eight precincts.
Thursday’s final count came from these forms, which had to be submitted by Wednesday evening. The Des Moines Register, citing unidentified officials in the Iowa GOP, reported that in 131 precincts, the forms showed numbers different than those reported on caucus night.
But some Form E’s didn’t show up at all.
The state party found that it was missing results from eight precincts, spread across five counties.
Source: "Santorum finished 34 votes ahead of Romney in new Iowa tally; votes from 8 precincts missing", by David A. Fahrenthold and Debbi Wilgoren, Washington Post, 19 January 2012
Santorum’s strange, belated victory also served to embarrass the Iowa GOP — which had to admit that it had misallocated some votes, and simply lost some others, in a razor’s-edge election where every vote mattered.
It also cast an unflattering light on the old-fashioned and convoluted system that the party uses to collect and count caucus votes.
“It should be like a fine Swiss watch,” said Iowa State political science professor Steffen Schmidt. “It’s really more like a sundial.” He said the system used by Iowa Democrats was not significantly better.
In fact, Iowa Republican leaders seemed to cast doubt on their own results, saying Thursday that it was hard to declare a “winner” without knowing what happened in those eight precincts.
Thursday’s final count came from these forms, which had to be submitted by Wednesday evening. The Des Moines Register, citing unidentified officials in the Iowa GOP, reported that in 131 precincts, the forms showed numbers different than those reported on caucus night.
But some Form E’s didn’t show up at all.
The state party found that it was missing results from eight precincts, spread across five counties.
Source: "Santorum finished 34 votes ahead of Romney in new Iowa tally; votes from 8 precincts missing", by David A. Fahrenthold and Debbi Wilgoren, Washington Post, 19 January 2012
THE ZIONIST AGENDA - STOP RON PAUL
Now
we find out that Texas Congressman and GOP candidate Ron Paul has been
targeted by a new breed of PAC, this time with foreign backing.
- "Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul" by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012
I sort of have to chuckle when they describe you and me as being dangerous. We are dangerous to the status quo in this country.
- Ron Paul after his second-place finish in New Hampshire primary, 10 January 2012
I want to say one other challenge that we face is simply that we must find an alternative to war and bloodshed. Anyone who feels, and there are still a lot of people who feel that way, that war can solve the social problems facing mankind is sleeping through a great revolution. President Kennedy said on one occasion, “Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind.” The world must hear this. I pray God that America will hear this before it is too late, because today we’re fighting a war.
– Martin Luther King, Jr., “Remaining Awake Through A Great Revolution”, 31 March 1968, National Cathedral, Washington, D.C.
- "Israeli Lobby launch new Super PAC effort to bring down Ron Paul" by Patrick Henningsen, Global Research, 21 January 2012
I sort of have to chuckle when they describe you and me as being dangerous. We are dangerous to the status quo in this country.
- Ron Paul after his second-place finish in New Hampshire primary, 10 January 2012
I want to say one other challenge that we face is simply that we must find an alternative to war and bloodshed. Anyone who feels, and there are still a lot of people who feel that way, that war can solve the social problems facing mankind is sleeping through a great revolution. President Kennedy said on one occasion, “Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind.” The world must hear this. I pray God that America will hear this before it is too late, because today we’re fighting a war.
– Martin Luther King, Jr., “Remaining Awake Through A Great Revolution”, 31 March 1968, National Cathedral, Washington, D.C.
