The Possibility That Nobody Died on 9/11
by hoi.polloi on November 16th, 2010, 8:26 pm
.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT NOBODY DIED ON 9/11
Many places besides this forum are discussing the possibility that the victim numbers of the "al Qaeda" acts are greatly inflated (not to mention the numbers supposedly in any kind of organization the government refers to as "extremist Muslim terrorists"). The public response to the war on terror has been mildly successful for the war-mongers at best. Yet, there is enough padding given to them by obedient serfs that don't check the hand full of bullies making a killing off of killing people, to allow their illegal and evil wars to go through. In the public, civil liberties are continually advancing against the government's twisted idea of flourishing through bloodshed; increasingly, people are refusing to have the radiation-heavy full body scans at airports, including a pilot who became famous overnight for telling the groping inspector "if you touch my junk [genitalia], I'll have you arrested" and then being threatened unfairly with a government fine for refusing the private inspectors who never caught any fictional "al Qaeda" characters anyway. Bless that man for making a stand! We should all be doing the same when are given opportunities to make a peaceful statement for freedom. If we did, there would be even less reason than they say there is now for sending troops and bombs into foreign countries.
Forsooth, before it was accepted that there may have been no "passenger-filled airplanes" cruising smoothly into steel skyscrapers in 2001, many had already discussed the possibility that no such thing divebombed into the Pentagon or a Pennsylvania field, and rightly pointed out that there hasn't been any evidence for such things. The number of crying "family members" or grave-side photos or whatever else that was presented as evidence of deaths did nothing to sway such people from arguing with facts - there simply was not evidence of an airplane crash in either case - who were these "family members" and "friends" mourning? The possibility that these pictures were fake was left hanging in the air like an invisible monolith - and had to be squashed by the government to prevent their entire story from breaking down.
Alex Jones - who had been sent in to manage the public perception of the "Waco" incident - was called again to save the government's ass. The official government answer - you read me correctly, official government answer - to the "are all these pictures, public appearances and radio interviews fake?" question was answered when "alternative" theorists were sent in by the government to stop people from questioning whether their government had the power to control so much media. "Alternative" theorists included Michael Moore, Alex Jones and Dylan Avery and their mission was to give people a convoluted explanation for passengers (of the unproven airplanes) being landed elsewhere and killed. This is what caused people to explain it that way - despite all lack of evidence. At last they had relief from the possibility of total government control of the media - an excuse for the "family" and "friend" photos and media showcases shown as evidence of the government's stories of 3,000 American deaths to be somehow real. How Americans love to have their Hollywood-linked heartstrings pulled!
Still, the existence of airplanes was and is problematic, and became moreso as these "alternative" theorists softly herded people away from the possibility of fewer passenger deaths into the realm of accepting all four "crashed airplane" stories of 9/11 and finally into the completely herded and government controlled "Tea Party" created as a pro-oligarchy pro-plutocratic non-democratic Laissez-faire capitalistic extremist party that essentially created this whole "War/Security-Profiteers More Equal Than Others" problem in the first place.
Strangely, and we can only assume this is because of the power of imagery to control our perceptions, the people who remained unconvinced of the slime-licking Ron Paul-pumping Alex Jones and his pundit parade, and who remained steadfast on the fact that no planes ever crashed at the Pentagon or Shanksville, still believed that two passenger airplanes did crash into the World Trade Center in New York City - and that the dramatic lack of witness testimony - even compared to Pentagon or Shanksville - for such an event was somehow explicable because of lack of visibility for most people. Despite the suggestion that this would leave most people out of the "live witness" story and placed in the "television witness" story, they believed their own story-telling about "millions of eye-witnesses" somehow holding water. Millions of television watchers, radio listeners, "smells of death"-smellers(you ever been to New York? It smells of death pretty much 24/7) and running crowds does not millions of eye-witnesses make. Indeed, the entire elaborate stories people were inventing to coincide with their "witness to television" testimony smelled more of War of the Worlds confusion than a record of reality.
Consider too that the staged acts at Pentagon and Shanksville had more than a convincing number of witnesses of airplane strikes. They even had witnesses of bombers, UAVs and a host of other stories prepared to shield the original from outside doubt. It didn't make the airplane crashes there any more credible - in fact it lent weight to the desperation with which the government was treating the story - willing to employ the news media to constantly push it through invented testimony, plug it into any sort of common conspiracy theory that will grab people's attentions and hire experts to explain the "unlikely but true" physics. Yet, here, in the amazing case of New York City where millions of people live and more millions visit on a daily basis, with nothing but a few hundred people claiming to have seen something - and a something that doesn't even coincide with the official story - we are not to assume that the witnesses essentially serve as the government's method of sneaking in a "passenger airplane" through the vast unlikelihood of such an event going unnoticed by a city with millions of inhabitants?
Finally, when those who doubted the entire story, and increasingly witnessed the government's vast empire of media trumpeting nation-wide about an "evil Muslim" attack, asked questions about the corrupt business interests involved in the World Trade Center, and wondered whether anybody died there at all, the people who doubted two or four fake airplane crashes said, "STOP". That's too far. Let's just stop with two or four fake airplanes. Despite the complexity of media stories the government invented to try to "prove" the obviously fake airplane crashes of the Pentagon and Shanksville, despite the incredible gullibility of a city that found itself served a relatively negligible amount of witnesses endorsing even the idea of something colliding with one or more of the World Trade Center towers, when it comes to lying about the number of people in a closed, obsolete, redundant block of useless real estate who died during all the fictional "airplane crash" exercises, then it's simply going too far.
Think about it; the easiest number of deaths to fake, inflate or deflate at will, are the ones that simply must have been real?
There are no passenger load manifests for a building (and there weren't any for the four "airplanes" either but that's another incredibly ridiculous story), there is no government oversight of people exiting or entering a building using some kind of traceable paperwork. (And I personally don't think there needs to be though the security profiteers might disagree!) There could really have been any number of people physically inside the buildings from 0 to 20,000 or more.
Why have any?
If you are going to fake airplane crashes with fictional airplanes with doubtful tail numbers and insider-trading airline companies, if you are going to hire your emergency pundits Michael Moore and Alex Jones to admit where your vast story went wrong in several areas just to preserve the tiny bit of the story that most Americans believe and try to tow them back into line, if you are going to have an infamously wealthy series of contractors bidding on the buildings such as Peter Munk and Larry Silverstein, and your own cousin Marvin Bush owns the security company that walks freely around the entire complex - why would you have anybody die at all? You wouldn't. Especially if you could temporarily fake a certain number of deaths that might be slightly believable for the number of agents and media stories you have to produce to manage them as formerly existing personnages.
You don't have to keep them alive. You just have to keep their stories alive - and the entire war on terror is justified for the patriotic Americans who leaped into action to fend off the invading hoards of saber-rattling Muslims. (Even if Americans had to be the ones flying across an ocean and two seas just to invade the area of the "looming invaders").
The entire story is a sad joke that actually, thankfully, fewer Americans fell for than the government would have liked. Now let's make it clear to those who still endorse the government's errant secret dealings with Israel, Saudi Arabia, NGOs and black ops contractors that they were wrong about "3,000 American innocents killed" for whatever conspiracy theory reason purported by the media or its "alternative" ilk -- and move on, together, with the world, in apologizing to its citizenry for such bogus hokum being shoved down our throats to keep the war-profiteers in action.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT NOBODY DIED ON 9/11
Many places besides this forum are discussing the possibility that the victim numbers of the "al Qaeda" acts are greatly inflated (not to mention the numbers supposedly in any kind of organization the government refers to as "extremist Muslim terrorists"). The public response to the war on terror has been mildly successful for the war-mongers at best. Yet, there is enough padding given to them by obedient serfs that don't check the hand full of bullies making a killing off of killing people, to allow their illegal and evil wars to go through. In the public, civil liberties are continually advancing against the government's twisted idea of flourishing through bloodshed; increasingly, people are refusing to have the radiation-heavy full body scans at airports, including a pilot who became famous overnight for telling the groping inspector "if you touch my junk [genitalia], I'll have you arrested" and then being threatened unfairly with a government fine for refusing the private inspectors who never caught any fictional "al Qaeda" characters anyway. Bless that man for making a stand! We should all be doing the same when are given opportunities to make a peaceful statement for freedom. If we did, there would be even less reason than they say there is now for sending troops and bombs into foreign countries.
Forsooth, before it was accepted that there may have been no "passenger-filled airplanes" cruising smoothly into steel skyscrapers in 2001, many had already discussed the possibility that no such thing divebombed into the Pentagon or a Pennsylvania field, and rightly pointed out that there hasn't been any evidence for such things. The number of crying "family members" or grave-side photos or whatever else that was presented as evidence of deaths did nothing to sway such people from arguing with facts - there simply was not evidence of an airplane crash in either case - who were these "family members" and "friends" mourning? The possibility that these pictures were fake was left hanging in the air like an invisible monolith - and had to be squashed by the government to prevent their entire story from breaking down.
Alex Jones - who had been sent in to manage the public perception of the "Waco" incident - was called again to save the government's ass. The official government answer - you read me correctly, official government answer - to the "are all these pictures, public appearances and radio interviews fake?" question was answered when "alternative" theorists were sent in by the government to stop people from questioning whether their government had the power to control so much media. "Alternative" theorists included Michael Moore, Alex Jones and Dylan Avery and their mission was to give people a convoluted explanation for passengers (of the unproven airplanes) being landed elsewhere and killed. This is what caused people to explain it that way - despite all lack of evidence. At last they had relief from the possibility of total government control of the media - an excuse for the "family" and "friend" photos and media showcases shown as evidence of the government's stories of 3,000 American deaths to be somehow real. How Americans love to have their Hollywood-linked heartstrings pulled!
Still, the existence of airplanes was and is problematic, and became moreso as these "alternative" theorists softly herded people away from the possibility of fewer passenger deaths into the realm of accepting all four "crashed airplane" stories of 9/11 and finally into the completely herded and government controlled "Tea Party" created as a pro-oligarchy pro-plutocratic non-democratic Laissez-faire capitalistic extremist party that essentially created this whole "War/Security-Profiteers More Equal Than Others" problem in the first place.
Strangely, and we can only assume this is because of the power of imagery to control our perceptions, the people who remained unconvinced of the slime-licking Ron Paul-pumping Alex Jones and his pundit parade, and who remained steadfast on the fact that no planes ever crashed at the Pentagon or Shanksville, still believed that two passenger airplanes did crash into the World Trade Center in New York City - and that the dramatic lack of witness testimony - even compared to Pentagon or Shanksville - for such an event was somehow explicable because of lack of visibility for most people. Despite the suggestion that this would leave most people out of the "live witness" story and placed in the "television witness" story, they believed their own story-telling about "millions of eye-witnesses" somehow holding water. Millions of television watchers, radio listeners, "smells of death"-smellers(you ever been to New York? It smells of death pretty much 24/7) and running crowds does not millions of eye-witnesses make. Indeed, the entire elaborate stories people were inventing to coincide with their "witness to television" testimony smelled more of War of the Worlds confusion than a record of reality.
Consider too that the staged acts at Pentagon and Shanksville had more than a convincing number of witnesses of airplane strikes. They even had witnesses of bombers, UAVs and a host of other stories prepared to shield the original from outside doubt. It didn't make the airplane crashes there any more credible - in fact it lent weight to the desperation with which the government was treating the story - willing to employ the news media to constantly push it through invented testimony, plug it into any sort of common conspiracy theory that will grab people's attentions and hire experts to explain the "unlikely but true" physics. Yet, here, in the amazing case of New York City where millions of people live and more millions visit on a daily basis, with nothing but a few hundred people claiming to have seen something - and a something that doesn't even coincide with the official story - we are not to assume that the witnesses essentially serve as the government's method of sneaking in a "passenger airplane" through the vast unlikelihood of such an event going unnoticed by a city with millions of inhabitants?
Finally, when those who doubted the entire story, and increasingly witnessed the government's vast empire of media trumpeting nation-wide about an "evil Muslim" attack, asked questions about the corrupt business interests involved in the World Trade Center, and wondered whether anybody died there at all, the people who doubted two or four fake airplane crashes said, "STOP". That's too far. Let's just stop with two or four fake airplanes. Despite the complexity of media stories the government invented to try to "prove" the obviously fake airplane crashes of the Pentagon and Shanksville, despite the incredible gullibility of a city that found itself served a relatively negligible amount of witnesses endorsing even the idea of something colliding with one or more of the World Trade Center towers, when it comes to lying about the number of people in a closed, obsolete, redundant block of useless real estate who died during all the fictional "airplane crash" exercises, then it's simply going too far.
Think about it; the easiest number of deaths to fake, inflate or deflate at will, are the ones that simply must have been real?
There are no passenger load manifests for a building (and there weren't any for the four "airplanes" either but that's another incredibly ridiculous story), there is no government oversight of people exiting or entering a building using some kind of traceable paperwork. (And I personally don't think there needs to be though the security profiteers might disagree!) There could really have been any number of people physically inside the buildings from 0 to 20,000 or more.
Why have any?
If you are going to fake airplane crashes with fictional airplanes with doubtful tail numbers and insider-trading airline companies, if you are going to hire your emergency pundits Michael Moore and Alex Jones to admit where your vast story went wrong in several areas just to preserve the tiny bit of the story that most Americans believe and try to tow them back into line, if you are going to have an infamously wealthy series of contractors bidding on the buildings such as Peter Munk and Larry Silverstein, and your own cousin Marvin Bush owns the security company that walks freely around the entire complex - why would you have anybody die at all? You wouldn't. Especially if you could temporarily fake a certain number of deaths that might be slightly believable for the number of agents and media stories you have to produce to manage them as formerly existing personnages.
You don't have to keep them alive. You just have to keep their stories alive - and the entire war on terror is justified for the patriotic Americans who leaped into action to fend off the invading hoards of saber-rattling Muslims. (Even if Americans had to be the ones flying across an ocean and two seas just to invade the area of the "looming invaders").
The entire story is a sad joke that actually, thankfully, fewer Americans fell for than the government would have liked. Now let's make it clear to those who still endorse the government's errant secret dealings with Israel, Saudi Arabia, NGOs and black ops contractors that they were wrong about "3,000 American innocents killed" for whatever conspiracy theory reason purported by the media or its "alternative" ilk -- and move on, together, with the world, in apologizing to its citizenry for such bogus hokum being shoved down our throats to keep the war-profiteers in action.
No comments:
Post a Comment