Depopulation and HIV
by
Jon
Rappoport
www.stratiawire.com
19 February — 12 March 2003
The Depopulation Agenda
(19 February 2003)
Depopulation and HIV (20 February 2003)
We Had to Discredit Peter Duesberg (21 February 2003)
More
on the AIDS Scam (26 February 2003)
AIDS as an Attack on the Male Gay Community (12 March
2003)
From a round-up of my best intelligence sources, and from my own 15 years of
research – the subject is depopulation.
A third of Africa to go under in the first long phase, which is underway now.
AIDS and other diseases will be the COVER STORY for the decimation. The real
causes will be starvation, contaminated water (which has existed for a long
time), toxic vaccines given to people who are already immune-suppressed, wars,
and of course, stolen farmland.
Many reports of rural villages disappearing – this will be laid at the
doorstep of AIDS. It already is. This is a cover story. This is a lie. HIV, as
detailed in my past stories, causes nothing. It is basically a dormant
retrovirus, like many others of its class. Its "amazingly intricate" activity in
the body is a made-up piece of non-science.
The day after my 1988 book,
AIDS INC., hit the shelves, a copy was on
its way out of California to Moscow in a diplomatic pouch. It was sent by an
agent of the USSR who was operating under diplomatic cover here.
This fact was relayed to me by one of my major sources for the book. He said,
"Won't they be surprised when they actually read it."
What he meant was, the Russians at the time were fronting the theory,
developed by East German biologist, Jakob Segal, that HIV was a lethal germ
engineered in Maryland. A biowar US creation.
My book instead proved that HIV – wherever it came from – was a harmless
retrovirus that was being used as a cover story to explain/conceal an emerging
depopulation operation in the Third World. HIV was also a cover for other
agendas outside the Third World.
As long as AIDS is the target of WHO/UN "humanitarian" efforts, the actual
causes – which are easily reversible – of death in Africa, Asia, and Latin
America are allowed to remain and fester and expand.
Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, has been a major thorn in the
side of the depopulationists. He knows that HIV does not cause human disease. He
knows that the front-line drugs for AIDS, especially AZT, attack the bone
marrow, where certain cells of the immune system are manufactured. Thus CREATING
what is called AIDS through pharmaceutical means. In particular, giving AZT to
pregnant mothers is a major goal of the depopulation effort.
Mbeki understands that the causes of death in the Third World I have
mentioned above are killing Africa. However, he continues to ask for outside
help to alleviate these ravages. There is no chance he will get this help. ZERO.
Mbeki is being contained, to a degree, in his attempts to form a real
coalition of leaders all over the African continent. MONEY is the weapon being
used against him. Payoffs, "aid", dollars, and so on.
Robert Gallo and
Luc Montagnier and other retrovirologists were languishing
at the end of the 1970s at the National Cancer Institute and the Pasteur
Institute, respectively. They had just finished their work on the doomed Viral
Cancer Project, which was a failed attempt to show that cancer was caused by one
or more viruses – in particular, a newly discovered class of germs called
retroviruses. These scientists had cut their teeth on these somewhat exotic but
unimportant germs. That was what they knew. They were fishing around for a new
disease that could bring them government dollars.
They were SET UP to become the new tigers who would get major research money
to explore an emerging phenomenon called AIDS.
HIV was, in their hands, destined to become the COVER STORY for death that
actually was occurring for MULTIPLE REASONS.
So Montagnier and Gallo did "discover" HIV and the rest is history – false
history.
I apprised the East German biologist
Jakob Segal, via mail, that his theory
about HIV was way off base. In the sense that it was not causing human disease.
If it was indeed a biowar creation, it was a failure.
Either my letter was intercepted, or he ignored it because he had his own
agenda. He had answered a previous letter of mine which had asked direct
questions about his work – but when I blew the whistle, he fell silent.
Meanwhile, I had interested author and environmentalist Jeremy Rifkin in HIV.
For a time – before I discovered the truth – I was exploring the possibility
that HIV had been put together from bovine and sheep viruses – and Rifkin was
very hot on the bovine factor – because there was a chance that HIV or some
bovine germ close to it was in smallpox vaccine. If so, it potentially
implicated the vaccine in millions of deaths in the Third World.
But then I dug deeper. I found out that NOTHING strange or exotic needed to
be in the vaccine. All by itself it could kill people. Particularly those whose
immune systems were suppressed already. And then I examined very closely the
medical evidence that had been advanced by Gallo and others to prove that HIV
was the cause of what was being called AIDS. I realized, in 1987, that this
evidence was non-existent.
I pointed out these two discoveries to Rifkin. He was not pleased. I think he
felt a little betrayed, because I had been feeding him much different
information before I saw the deeper truth. And Rifkin was basically pointing
himself toward a theory that irresponsible medical germ machination itself was
implicated in AIDS. He felt that tinkering with germs in labs was where the real
action was. I told him the Plot was more insidious than that, and HIV was really
a cover story for the depopulation agenda. He soon abandoned his AIDS project.
During this period (1987-88), I met a member of the secret service of one of
the African nations "most afflicted with AIDS". This man was basically loyal to
his people, and he felt that a gigantic hoax was being perpetrated. At some risk
to himself, he spoke to me about various doctors who had come to his family and
told them that AIDS research was being done in order to prove that so-called
Slim Disease – at that time the African label for AIDS – was the result of HIV.
These doctors were amazed that such obviously false research was being accepted.
In particular, they cited
Lancet, the famous British medical journal, as
the publisher of some of this research.
I then did my own examination of a key paper by Serwadda which attempted to
establish Slim as a new and emerging phenomenon on the African continent. The
paper was so full of unsupported statements, so rife with omissions, that I
concluded Slim was basically a diversionary label for: starvation, dirty water,
stolen land, and immunosuppressive vaccines.
At bottom, why all this false science? Because someone needed a cover story
to conceal a persistent and intentionally unsolved situation in Africa that was
causing death according to a plan to depopulate the continent.
A PLAN: DEPOPULATION.
A COVER STORY TO CONCEAL THE PLAN: HIV.
MEDICAL DUPES TO PROVIDE THE COVER STORY: GALLO, MONTAGNIER, SERWADDA, AND
OTHERS.
AN INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AGENCY THAT WOULD DO EVERYTHING EXCEPT HELP SOLVE THE
REAL AND CONTINUING CAUSES OF DEATH IN AFRICA: THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION.
A DIVERSIONARY AND PHONY DEBATE THAT ACTUALLY FORWARDS THE DEPOPULATION
AGENDA: WHETHER TO LOWER PRICES ON TOXIC AND DESTRUCTIVE AIDS DRUGS FOR AFRICA.
[
In 1987, I became re-acquainted with a man who calls himself
Ellis Medavoy [pseudonym]. He has since retired from his contract work as a propaganda
consultant.
Medavoy supplied me with several contact numbers and a small pile of
documents. Using these, I convinced myself that he was entirely legitimate. That
he in fact was working on AIDS, and in a very curious way.
His job was to influence the press in the direction of completely accepting
mainstream research on the subject of HIV. By 1987, this was not what you would
call hard work. But he had been at it since 1982 – when all sorts of theories
about AIDS abounded in the press and in the specialized medical literature.
Medavoy had been retained by "individuals who were part of the Council on
Foreign Relations and the British Roundtable but were not acting as official
representatives of those groups."
In 1983, a year before HIV (aka HTLV-III) was announced to the world as the
official cause of AIDS, Medavoy knew that Robert Gallo would be the messenger
for "some kind of retrovirus that would be said to be the driving force behind a
global plague."
Medavoy had several tasks before him. The first one was to soften up
reporters so they would be receptive to the idea that a virus was the cause of
AIDS. Essentially, Medavoy had access to certain key sources that these
reporters often used for medical stories.
His job was to convince these sources that "the inside word was" a
retrovirus. A retrovirus was causing AIDS. Then these sources would pass that
word along to reporters.
Medavoy, of course, already knew these reporters' "reliable sources." He had
been cultivating them for years, in a variety of contexts. They trusted him.
And why not? He seemed to be right on the money time and time again. What he
told these sources would happen did happen. And when the sources passed down
Medavoy's advance wisdom to their reporter friends, the reporters were all too
happy to get this prized info.
That was how Medavoy worked. He was not alone, of course. There were others
like him, and others working on the AIDS issue. Medavoy's bosses considered AIDS
a very big deal. It had to be positioned correctly. It had to be thought of in a
certain way, so that it could be used as a smokescreen, a lie, to conceal the
depopulation agenda that had been underway for a long time in Africa, Latin
America, and Asia.
"When I got this assignment," Medavoy told me, "I knew I was in some very
important territory. The world was going to be told a lie, and they were
supposed to believe that lie. Civilians, doctors, researchers, politicians –
they all had to swallow the propaganda."
And what was the central piece of propaganda?
That HIV was the cause of AIDS.
Medavoy continued, "There were things that the public had to be shielded
from, too. Under no circumstances could they get the notion that AIDS was really
many different conditions. That was a supreme no-no. The medical journals, as
well, had to refrain from picking up that tune. AIDS had to be thought of as ONE
disease condition – the destruction of the immune system – which was happening
solely because a germ, HIV, was attacking cells of the immune system."
Medavoy understood all of this at least a year before Robert Gallo would tell
the world on television that HIV (HTLV-III) was the cause of AIDS.
So Medavoy began to plant the seed.
He began to meet with people (some of them doctors and researchers), and he
told them that they could count on the fact that a virus would be found, a virus
which was causing AIDS. He told them he had the word from deep inside the major
research institutes around the world that were working on the problem. He told
them they would be "in no trouble" if they started telling reporters who relied
on them that it would be a virus – and a particular kind of virus, a retrovirus.
Medavoy told these people – who were in turn reliable sources for reporters –
that Robert Gallo was surely the man who would win the race to find the cause of
AIDS. Gallo was the one to keep their eyes on.
Medavoy told me, "Gallo himself was not in on this gigantic hoax. He would
steal the germ from Montagnier and call it his own, but that was just theft.
Gallo was just a pawn. He was a man who wanted desperately to find a retrovirus
as the cause of AIDS, just as he had been a man who desperately wanted to find a
retrovirus as the cause of cancer. He had learned this new field of exploration
– retroviruses – and it was his only real ticket to fame. He was riding that
pony for all it was worth, and the federal money, such as it was in those days,
was mainly coming to him and his colleagues at the National Cancer Institute."
Gallo had been selected to be the "HIV messenger" because it was clear he
would do whatever it took to finally say, "I found it!" Even if he had not found
it. Even if the evidence was missing. (As I've written before – at the time, in
the spring of 1984, when Gallo told the world he had found the cause of AIDS, he
had not published a single paper that even purported to seriously prove that HIV
was the cause of AIDS.)
Gallo wouldn't disappoint the planners of this scam. He would deliver the
goods. And he did.
And then Medavoy was riding high. All his predictions had come true. What he
told these "reliable sources," who in turn passed that information along to
reporters, had been exact. AIDS was announced to be a condition caused by a
single retrovirus.
Job of lying well done.
Lie accepted.
Universally.
Well, almost.
There were a few disgruntled scientists who fully realized that Gallo had
never offered proof that HIV caused AIDS, but they were keeping their mouths
shut. They could see the weather shift overnight in the spring of 1984. There
was no more federal money for looking into the cause of AIDS, or for confirming
or disproving Gallo. It had evaporated in hours. Suddenly, all federal funds
were earmarked for discovering
how HIV caused AIDS, what it actually did
inside the body.
I once asked Medavoy, "Did you yourself know what AIDS really was?"
He laughed. "Of course I did. I had to know. I needed that information so I
could develop the necessary propaganda to counter it."
"And what was your understanding of what AIDS is?"
"You should know," he said. "You've been writing about it."
Here is what he meant, and what I confirmed with him point by point: AIDS is
a label given to a whole variety of disease conditions THAT ARE CAUSED BY
DIFFERENT THINGS. Not HIV. Not HIV in any way, direct or indirect. What is
called AIDS is immune suppression. This immune suppression can result from
different causes in different groups and, ultimately, in different individuals.
Some of the many causes – contaminated heroin, medical drugs (such as
corticosteroids), starvation, contaminated water supplies, toxic pesticides,
intestinal parasites grossly overtreated with massive doses of antibiotics,
syphilis, massive drug taking, say, in the form of MDA – combined with months of
bathhouse sex with many partners, vaccines given to people whose immune systems
are already dangerously compromised. There are other causes.
Medavoy's propaganda work was aimed, in particular, at masking the continuing
causes of death on the African continent – starvation, contaminated water
supplies, theft of agricultural lands, and so on. Gradually, these obvious
factors would be replaced in the public consciousness with a new buzz-term, HIV.
As the real causes of death were allowed to flourish, depopulation would begin
to overtake the population growth.
Medavoy worked on the entirely bogus green-monkey theory of AIDS.
"The green monkey," Medavoy told me, "was a myth invented to attribute the
origin of HIV to Africa. It was understood that if HIV could be said to have
come from Africa, then people would believe the outrageous estimates and
projections for future AIDS deaths IN Africa. You know, darkest Africa, where
strange and bad things lurk. We played that nonsense like a harp. The green
monkey never even carried HIV – of course who cares because HIV causes nothing
anyway. But the whole deal about those monkeys was really about lab monkeys in
Boston who were found to have a virus 'similar' to HIV – and lab contamination
was where that 'similar' virus actually came from. We knew way ahead of time –
as we propounded the early green-monkey story – that it was monkeys in labs we
were really talking about. We were talking about stupid and careless research in
labs, and we were transferring that whole business into a ridiculous myth about
Africa. The story was about as real as the moon being made of cheese."
[
In the spring of 1987, propaganda consultant Ellis Medavoy became aware that
his objectives were being threatened by a University of Berkeley virologist
named Peter Duesberg.
Duesberg had just published a long paper in the journal
Cancer Research.
That paper made a case against HIV as the cause of AIDS.
Duesberg was far from being a nobody. He was a star in his field. He had
grant monies to do research. He had a lab at Berkeley and graduate students
lining up to be part of his team. Duesberg was, in addition, a recognized expert
in the emerging field of retrovriruses.
He was, in his own way, the equal, in terms of prestige, of Robert Gallo. In
fact, Duesberg had worked with Gallo and Montagnier and others in the doomed
Viral Cancer Project, an effort to show that cancers were caused by
retroviruses.
Duesberg had bailed out of that project. "I could see that we weren't getting
anywhere," he told me. "These viruses were interesting, but I discovered that
they weren't very important as far as cancer research was concerned. But Gallo
and others stayed on. They had their reasons. I was glad to leave. Disappointed,
to a degree, but satisfied. I had seen what there was to see."
Medavoy told me, "Duesberg was a wild card. We knew we could come across one,
and he was it. He saw through the propaganda we were spreading in the guise of
science. He attacked HIV from a researcher's point of view and he said all the
right things. That is, he didn't know there was an intense propaganda campaign
coordinated at high levels to 'protect' HIV as the cause of AIDS. But he knew
the science. He knew the difference between real research and badly done or fake
research. And HIV was, make no mistake about it, a fake from day one."
In his
Cancer Research paper, Duesberg had said several things. Among
the most important was, HIV was, at best, infecting only a tiny percentage of
(immune-system) T-cells. This made no sense. If HIV was killing immune systems,
it had to be doing much more than that.
Duesberg also began to comment on the wild contradiction implicit in HIV
testing. He noticed that the blood test was looking for antibodies which had
formed as part of the body's defense against HIV. The presence of such
antibodies was taken as a sign that a person was going to develop full-blown
AIDS and die. But, on the other hand, a vaccine against AIDS would produce the
exact same antibodies, in which case people would be said to be immune from
AIDS.
Medavoy told me, "Duesberg got that one right too. He saw that the HIV test
was completely insane. He was telling the research community they had been roped
in by a bunch of fakers – and so we had to do some heavy damage control."
Duesberg was not the only problem. At Berkeley, a few other people were
waking up. Harry Rubin, one of the grand old men of virology, was willing to go
public and say he thought HIV research needed a "second opinion." Richard
Strohman, a cell biologist at the school, was also dissatisfied with the glib
crowning of Gallo as the discoverer of the cause of AIDS. And then, there was a
maverick professor of law at Berkeley, Phillip Johnson, who was more than
willing to join in the fray. He not only agreed with Duesberg, he was able to
organize the arguments against HIV in a more structured way than Duesberg, in
speaking forums, usually bothered to. (Eventually, this burgeoning little group
would expand to include more than 300 scientists and journalists who signed on
to a short letter asserting that HIV science was deficient and needed a complete
review by impartial people. One signer was Kary Mullis, a Nobel laureate who had
discovered the PCR test for DNA. Mullis was like the grim reaper when it came to
HIV. He was willing to take on anyone anywhere.)
But in 1987, it was mainly Duesberg who was carrying the banner against false
science. Duesberg's principal ally at the time was Harvey Bialy, the research
editor of
Bio/Technology, a sister publication of
Nature, the
revered medical journal. Bialy was completely disgusted with the rush to
judgement that had accompanied Gallo's unsubstantiated claims for HIV as the
cause of AIDS.
Bialy was definitely not a man to tangle with in print. He was quite willing
to do the one thing most career-minded researchers were loathe to engage in.
Bialy would read a key paper on the subject of HIV all the way through and in
detail, and then blast the arguments to smithereens. Point by point. Like
Duesberg, he read the fine print and the methods sections, and he was brutal in
his criticism. Bialy saw that, in a field (virology) that once rippled with
extensive debate, AIDS was taking over as mush-science. Press-conference
science. Bubble-head science. Science on behalf of gaining money grants to spout
the favored line.
In 1987, Ellis Medavoy, whose job it was to protect HIV against all
detractors, told me he was getting fed up with his own profession. He wanted
out. He was ready to end his long career as one of the bad guys – mostly because
he saw where things were headed – into a vast depopulation effort that would
take decades and decades. This was a bit more than he had bargained for. Medavoy
was somewhat unstable, you could say. Depending on what day you talked with him,
he could be ready to throw in the towel – or he might display a completely
arrogant attitude toward the rest of the human race. At any rate, before he did
actually drop out and quit, he began to tell me about what he was doing – and in
some cases, how he was doing it.
Ellis Medavoy and his colleagues had, besides Peter Duesberg, another problem
on their hands. Through the efforts of certain "subversive reporters" – and
guess who was in that crowd? – connections were being forged with the
alternative health community. Some of these activists had never been much for
blaming human disease on germs, and the revelations about fake HIV science were
quite exciting to them. Furthermore, there were people who had been diagnosed as
HIV positive or "full-blown AIDS" who were surviving quite well because they
were taking care of their health. They were rejecting the whole HIV premise and
they were exercising and changing their diets and not taking any more drugs and
taking nutrients and so on. And staying away from AZT. These people were living
testimonials to a sensational kind of healing – and if THAT got out far and
wide, the whole sordid game could be blown off its hinges.
Medavoy said, "A lot of what we did at this point was stop things from
getting into print. That's often more important than planting lies. As far as
Duesberg was concerned, I can tell you there were many newspapers and magazines
who were ready to give his views some space. You know, maverick scientist
rejects HIV as cause of AIDS. So we began a coordinated effort to keep that from
happening. We let the scientists at NIH [National Institutes of Health], who had
the most to lose if Duesberg could establish a credible beachhead, handle the PR
on rejecting Duesberg's science. They engaged in some character assassination as
well, which was fine. We, on the other side, got "reliable sources" to go to
those newspapers and magazines and tell them that to print anything good about
Duesberg was DANGEROUS and IRRESPONSIBLE. That was our tack. We had our people
say that thousands of people could die if they stopped believing that HIV was
the cause of AIDS. Promiscuous sex would become more rampant than ever, people
would get infected, get sick, and spread the virus even further. We hammered on
all this, and we cowed most of those media outlets. It worked, for the most
part."
"As far as the very embarrassing and growing list of AIDS survivors was
concerned – the people who had rejected the idea of HIV and were rebuilding
their health successfully without medical drugs – we tried to keep track of
pending stories on these people, and we went to those media outlets and told
them these people were 'vegetarian kooks' and 'anecdotal examples who had not
been studied by real scientists' and 'publicity seekers' and so on. We said some
of them had never really been HIV positive to begin with. It was like shooting
pigeons. We did pretty well. Some stories did appear on these survivors, but the
general tone was, 'so and so is a strange curiosity and scientists are studying
why he has managed to live for so long without getting sick, and this may hold
promise for future research.' You know, all that crap."
Here is another choice quote from Medavoy on the AIDS scam. He told me this
in 1996:
"Some other operatives I was aware of played a role in getting mainstream
researchers to lobby for, and win, a new standard for HIV illness, based purely
on numbers of T-cells. [Note: this "innovation" came later, long after 1987.]
Tests would determine if a person was 'getting sick,' or if he was 'getting
better' after taking his AZT – all measured by how many T-cells [part of the
immune system defense] showed up on the tests. These operatives knew, and had
been briefed on this, that T-cells could actually vary all over the place, up
and down, depending on factors like the time of day a person was given the test.
It was another area of shoddy science, and they took advantage of it. I'll give
you an example. You've got some guy who has been told he's HIV positive, and so,
even though he's not sick at all, he gets tested every few months for numbers of
T-cells. Sooner or later, those numbers will go down on a test. If the doctor
isn't really attentive, he'll tell the patient he is now officially diagnosed
with full-blown AIDS, because those numbers are too low. If the patient hasn't
been taking AZT yet, he will go for it now."
By the mid-1990s, Peter Duesberg no longer got grant money from the
government. His major lab at Berkeley was gone. Graduate students were told
they'd be risking their futures if they associated their names with him.
Years before, Robert Gallo had told me, "The thing about Peter is, he's
different. He's very bright, and he goes his own way. Sometimes that way turns
out to be...unusual, strange. He can be difficult on purpose, you know. As if
he's trying to adopt a position that challenges everybody else. He's a different
kind of man."
Ironic, coming from the tyrannical and arbitrary Gallo, the man who had laid
claim to the virus that doesn't cause anything.
[
In the wake of three major articles on AIDS I've just published on this site,
I notice a story on Channel 4 (England) about a major AIDS flap in Africa.
Some researchers are now saying that, contrary to hundreds of published
studies, dirty needles and not sex is the major transmission route for AIDS on
that continent.
There are so many lies implicit in this assertion, one hardly knows where to
begin.
But let's look at a few obvious facts.
Using and re-using needles for vaccinations and other injections is a very
dangerous practice all on its own. The major threat, as any junkie knows, is to
the liver. The usual name for this is Hepatitis. In fact, we are really talking
about all sorts of toxins that are inserted directly into the bloodstream –
bypassing the normal channels of immune defense. The toxic burden falls on the
liver and other organs.
Many of those re-used needles in Africa came from "humanitarian" Western
interventions to save the failing health of Africa. No one really knows the
names of all the doctors and health workers who re-used those needles – how many
African names, how many Western names.
But it's clear that if the UN (World Health Organization/UNICEF) really
wanted to save lives all these years and decades, they would have spent, as part
of their budget, some money on supplying vast numbers of needles to Africa. Not
a difficult thing to do.
Of course, when you are injecting toxic medical drugs and toxic vaccines into
the bloodstreams of people who are already immune-suppressed, you should STOP
and really think about cleaning up contaminated water supplies and getting
growing land for people back from transnational corporations – and you should
forego the drugs and the vaccines because they push people over the edge into
death.
This latest research finding about needles really has nothing to do with AIDS
at all. It has to do with the fact that the UN and its subsidiaries have
functioned as an obstacle to, and an enemy of, health.
I had not really intended to extend my series on AIDS and depopulation past
those three articles, but my source for some of that material – retired
propaganda expert Ellis Medavoy – had told me much about vaccines in Africa.
Medavoy was quite familiar with operatives whose job it was to convince
government leaders and journalists in Africa that vaccines were a messiah of
sorts.
"It wasn't as easy as you think," Medavoy said. "There were leaders who
didn't want their people to become healthy – and since they [the leaders]
believed that vaccines could work this trick, they were sour on it, to a degree.
But the carrot as usual was money. Payoffs. 'We'll pay you to make your people
healthy.' You would think this odd arrangment would be a tipoff, but money tends
to make people blind."
"There is absolutely no doubt," Medavoy said recently, "that ample numbers of
needles could have been supplied to Africa. The myth is that doctors over there
are too stupid to want new needles, but of course that's not the case. So there
has been a double-whammy. Toxic drugs and toxic vaccines, plus dirty needles.
Now you are seeing the cherry on top of the cake. After decades of starvation
and dirty water, and wars, and all that, you got essentially poison being
delivered to people in the form of so-called medicines AND they also got
whatever was on those re-used needles. The doctors and health workers there WERE
blind to the fact that the drugs and vaccines were not necessary and were, in
fact, toxic – they thought there was such a need, it was better to re-use
needles if that was the only way to deliver the medicines."
Yes, we are still talking about depopulation. Still talking about the Trojan
Horse.
And like dirty needles, the allowed export of spoiled and unrefrigerated
medical drugs from the West – okayed without significant protest by the UN – to
Africa, have compounded the crisis still further.
One more aspect. I have written about this before. Every day, as those
decaying drugs are moving into Africa, tons and tons of pesticides banned in the
US as too toxic are also being shipped to Africa and other parts of the Third
World.
There is only one label for what I'm writing about in this article: chem/bio
warfare.
See the mosaic. Add in all those overflights of coca fields in Andean
countries, and the spraying of poisons on small coca farmers. The true purpose
is not the eradication of a source of cocaine; it is the "reclaiming" of land
for corporate and military use.
Add in what Medavoy calls "secret local operations [brought in from the West]
which involve the use of experimental chemical-warfare compounds in the Third
World..."
The picture fills out.
At the highest levels, this is intentional and its goal is depopulation and
debilitation.
I have been deluged with requests for more information on the AIDS scam – in
particular, how to verify independently the statements made by retired
propaganda pro Ellis Medavoy.
Medavoy has recounted to me his role in shaping media response to HIV. "It
was a false piece of science to begin with. HIV causes disease like a toy rocket
can go to the moon. It was our job to make sure media, governments, scientists,
and the public swallowed the idea that an unproven germ caused 'a new plague.'"
I can make a few suggestions on starting points, for those researchers and
reporters who want to take a ride into murky waters.
I believe that amfAR (American Foundation for AIDS Research) played a
significant role in stamping out dissent about HIV. And there was dissent right
after Robert Gallo went on national TV in the spring of 1984 and told the world
he had found the cause of AIDS. But the work of fund-raising machines like AMFAR
would have been dealt a serious blow if Gallo had been denounced as a fraud or
an over-eager researcher without real portfolio.
Those fund-raising organizations needed a germ they could focus on, a
standard they could use to rally the troops. "Now we have the cause. Now we need
to know how the germ attacks the body, and we need drugs to treat the germ. Help
us. Dig deep?"
Dr. Joseph Sonnabend, a NYC researcher who also treated AIDS patients, was
the editor of a journal called
AIDS Research around the time Gallo made
his startling announcement to the world, the announcement that effectively ended
all mainstream inquiry into what AIDS was and what caused it.
Sonnabend clung to his editorial policy of permitting dissenting views in his
journal. For that he was suddenly fired. Had someone at amfAR asked for his
firing? It is a question that could be explored.
If amfAR was somehow involved in the effort to cast an unproven germ, HIV, as
the cause of AIDS, one of course would have to go higher on the ladder of power.
Another starting point would be WHO (World Health Organization). As a
possible front for larger power players who were pushing a depopulation agenda
in the Third World. HIV served and serves well as a smokescreen for the
continued massive death tolls from starvation, dirty water, and vaccines given
to millions of people whose immune systems already sit on the brink of
extinction. WHO, of course, was behind most of those vaccine programs. And WHO,
while making genteel noises about the need for cleaning up contaminated water
supplies and providing agricultural lands for food to the poor, has
accomplished, on its massive budget, very little in this direction.
You might go to Google and punch in "NSSM 200", and read the executive
summary and text of the long Henry Kissinger memo, drafted in April of 1974. It
was originally classified secret by the US government. Reading between the
lines, you will see that it calls for measures to reduce population in the Third
World. It even suggests "improvements in technology" as a light at the end of
the tunnel for this program. As I've written before, anti-fertility vaccines
have been under development for some time at the UN and other places. And HIV
itself – used as a smokescreen – could function perfectly as a way of "benignly
neglecting" the real killers in the third World – starvation, dirty water,
stolen land, vaccines and so on.
I have also received inquiries about various independent researchers who
state that HIV was developed as an intentional biowar weapon. I have done a fair
amount of research, over the years, into biowar germ programs. As early as 1987,
I stated that germs escaping from biowar labs could certainly do damage.
However, even assuming that HIV were "made" as an attacking germ, it is clear to
me that it would have been a failure. HIV has never been shown to cause
anything. And even more important, if you look at every so-called high-risk AIDS
group of people, you can and do find non-HIV factors that explain all the immune
suppression that has been occurring in these groups. The germ is the cover
story. The smokescreen. The mask. The diversion.
[
This is a continuation of a series of articles I have been writing about AIDS
and the intention behind it. The subject here is the Hepatitis B vaccine and its
role in a health-destroying political agenda.
In 1987, while I was in the middle of writing a book called
AIDS INC.,
the propaganda operative I have referred to as Ellis Medavoy (not his real name)
told me, "You have to look at the Trojan Horse part of the scenario. It's
involved in the Hepatitis vaccine."
Well, I had already done much research on the vaccine, and I was trying to
put the pieces together. I had been told that the original clinical trials of
the experimental Hepatitis B vaccine, which focused on New York, San Francisco,
and Los Angeles, had enrolled young gay men in the late 1970s to test out this
vaccine. Gay men who fit the profile of what would be later announced as the
profile of the first AIDS cases in the early 1980s. Yes, that was suggestive.
The profile was suggestive, as well as the cities. And the timing too.
Perhaps something in the vaccine was causing what was being called AIDS.
Several independent investigators believed that the ingredient in the vaccine
was HIV itself. But I had already demolished all the arguments that claimed HIV
was the cause of AIDS. I wasn't interested in that.
I had already established that AIDS was an umbrella label that was being
applied to all sorts of individuals and groups who were suffering from
suppressed immune systems – and a suppressed immune system is caused by all
sorts of different factors. Chemical factors, drug factors, starvation,
contaminated water, AIDS drugs, and so on.
So perhaps that old experimental Hepatitis B vaccine was another factor which
had suppressed the immune systems of the gay men who had participated in the
original clinical trials.
I asked Medavoy what he meant by a Trojan Horse operation. He was cagey, and
he didn't give me a direct answer. "Keep looking," he said. "It's right in front
of your face."
In 1987-8, I spoke several times with Dr. Cladd Stevens, a bigshot at the NY
Blood Center, the group that had been in charge of the experimental Hep B
vaccine clinical trial in New York. She readily admitted that some men in those
trials had later tested positive for HIV, but I wasn't interested in that. HIV
positive? So what? HIV didn't cause anything.
I asked her how many men from those trials had later been diagnosed with
full-blown AIDS and/or had died. I wanted to know if there was a correlation
between gay men who had taken that experimental vaccine and subsequent real and
severe illness and death.
On this point, she was forthcoming, in the sense that she assured me an
effort was being made to do such a study. It would involve using names or
confidential numbers assigned to men in the vaccine trial – and comparing that
list with a list of names or confidential numbers of reported AIDS cases/deaths
held by the CDC in Atlanta. She said I should check back with her.
I did, several times, between 1987 and 1992, and she gave me variations on
the same story: there was a lot of red tape involved in getting the names and
numbers released and matched up. To my knowledge, a definitive comparison has
never been done.
Why not? It was important.
Has the NY Blood Center been avoiding possible liability?
Between 1987 and 1993, Ellis Medavoy would periodically ask me, "Have you
figured out the Trojan Horse yet?"
I hadn't. I knew that vaccines could suppress the immune system, and I knew
that the original experimental Hep B vaccine could have had that effect on some
of the gay men in the clinical trial. Perhaps that was it. In fact, I was
getting what I considered reliable reports that the experimental vaccine WAS
immunosuppressive. But I felt there was more to the story.
I began to think that HIV testing itself was part of the picture. If the
authorities could get a group, any group, to fear AIDS, it could convince that
group to get tested in large numbers – DISPROPORTIONATELY LARGE NUMBERS,
COMPARED WITH OTHER GROUPS WHERE THE FEAR OF AIDS WAS NOT SO GREAT.
This was major. I imagined a group of people who lived in a small town. All
sorts of people. Gay, straight, white, black, male, female. Suppose the CDC
stepped in and for various specious reasons told these residents that AIDS was
lurking in the town and it was imperative that they all get tested for HIV. It
would bring lots of citizens to the clinics.
In fact, that was what had happened to the "gay community" in America.
American gay men were being blood tested for HIV out of all proportion to the
rest of America.
In 1992, I had long-since completed research on the unreliability of the HIV
blood test. For various reasons, the test often gave FALSELY positive results.
In other words, people were being told that they were harboring the HIV virus.
The killer virus. The stealth virus that could lie around in their bodies for
two years, five years, 15 years, 30 years, and then wake up and kill them.
I knew that was baloney, I knew that HIV had nothing to do with what was
being called AIDS, but I also knew that the diagnosis of "HIV positive" was a
lethal piece of hypnotism that could make some people jump out of windows.
Michael Ellner, a New York hypnotherapist, had done important work on this
issue. He was spreading the word: the DIAGNOSIS itself was immunosuppressive.
Not only that, the diagnosis – which tended to put people in a trance – was
the immediate prelude to the doctor telling his patient, "Now you must go on AZT
immediately, because it can extend your life."
The AZT part of my research was also, in 1992, already done. I knew this drug
was a failed chemotherapy compound which had been put on the shelf at the
National Cancer Institute in the early 1960s. It attacked all human cells. It
had a particular affinity for the bone marrow, where certain cells of the immune
system were MANUFACTURED. Although, as Dr. Peter Duesberg suggested, some
patients appeared to be able to urinate out the drug without absorbing it, many
patients did absorb it. AZT. A chemo drug that destroyed cells and blocked cell
reproduction. AZT. A drug which in effect had been designed to CAUSE IMMUNE
SUPPRESSION. And this drug was not being given to cancer patients in short
spurts. It was being given to HIV positive people around the clock day in and
day out. An oncologist who gave his cancer patients chemo every day for years
would have his license stripped and might even face criminal charges. Murder
comes to mind.
I was on the edge of the Trojan Horse.
If you get a group of people (e.g., gay men) to fear AIDS so much that they
rush to get tested, and if the test itself – THE TROJAN HORSE – is so flawed it
gives lots of people false positive readings – and if even the true positive
readings are for a virus (HIV) which causes NOTHING – and if a positive HIV test
tends to function like a trance-inducer – leading to the acceptance of AZT, a
massively toxic drug – then you have a kind of closed loop of death.
With all this now in tow, in 1992-3, I went back to my notes on the hep B
vaccine. Suppose, in addition to the vaccine's immunosuppressive effects, it
could cause a blood test for HIV TO READ FALSELY POSITIVE.
- Lee D, Eby W, Molinaro G. 1992. "HIV false positivity after hepatitis B
vaccination", Lancet. 339:1060.
That was not the only citation.
I called Ellis Medavoy and told him what I had found.
"Yeah," he said. "It's all spread out there for you now, isn't it?"
He made one other comment which I consider very significant. "If you could
figure it out, don't you think people at the CDC and NIH know about it? And
don't you think propaganda and PR people have been used to make sure that
nothing comes of this? Remember I once told you my most important job is
nothing? What the hell do you think I meant? It's making sure that, when the
hounds get close, you dazzle and blind them with nothing, with OMISSIONS in the
press. They try to snap and take a bite out of you and they get air. They get
NOTHING."
If you investigate the last 25 years of Hepatitis B, the disease, you will
find or put together a chapter on the promotion of fear about the disease in the
male gay community of America. Leading to? Large numbers of gay men getting
vaccinations against Hep B. Leading, in turn, to false positive HIV tests.
Leading to the administration of killer, cell-destroying drugs.
And – this is quite spooky, but in a good wa
y –
talk about synchronicity – I've just received an email of a 1998 interview done
by reporter Mark Conlan with Dr. Stefan
Lanka, a German virologist and marine
biologist – Dr. Lanka has been one of the most outspoken European scientists on
the issue of AIDS fraud. In the interview, Lanka mentions his colleague and
friend, Dr. Heinrich
Kremer, formerly the medical director of the Federal German
Drug Abuser Clinics. Lanka states what Kremer discovered in the mid-1980s and
what happened to him:
"[Kremer] knew everybody who went through [had] chronic hepatitis or had the
hepatitis B vaccine would test 'HIV positive.'...He informed the mass media..."
"So he [Kremer] knew [after his rejection by the mass media] that it [the
AIDS scam] was intentional from the very beginning. They [the higher-ups,
politically, in Germany and, by implication, elsewhere] wanted to have a blood
and sex plague...He [Kremer] was dealing at the top political level. They told
him off the record, that they knew [about the fraud], they didn't care, it was
about how to deal with the drug problem and with the homosexuals."
The meaning of this is clear. Drug users and certain areas in the gay
community were experiencing high levels of Hepatitis B – and added to this, the
Hepatitis B vaccine was also used widely in these groups. The result was a
falsely positive HIV test – leading to the domino effect of death I've described
above. It's called depopulation.
Lanka continues, "They even tried to kill him [Kremer], and this didn't
succeed. He had a good intuition and got out of his car before the tire blew
out...the German government was carrying out a secret psychological
investigation, trying to prove that he was mentally ill...and in danger of
committing suicide..."
Okay. Having read to this point, now read the pages I wrote on the Hepatitis
B vaccine in 1987-88. Those pages will fill in some blanks. They're not as
compressed as what you have just read – at that time I was swimming in various
discoveries simultaneously: HIV was not the cause of AIDS; AIDS was not one
condition at all, it was a smokescreen label for many different factors which
were suppressing immune systems and killing people; AZT was poison; and so on.
And I had not yet made the connection between the Hep B vaccine and a positive
HIV test.
A decade ago [mid-1970s], 1083 gay men in good health were inoculated with
an experimental vaccine against hepatitis B, an infectious viral disease.
The trial was run at a prestigious research facility, the New York Blood
Center.
From NY Blood Center accounts, results were very good: There was virtually
full protection against hepatitis B, which reportedly was starting to run
rampant through pockets of the U.S. gay community.
At that time, in 1978, AIDS was an uninvented word. And not until 1984 would
HIV be isolated and labeled by Luc Montagnier and Robert Gallo. When
so-called AIDS crept into public view in 1979, and then gained wide
attention in the early 80s, people began fearing the hepatitis B vaccine.
The reason? The vaccine had originally been made from blood of human donors,
some of whom later turned out to be diagnosed with AIDS. During the early
1980s, health workers, who were at risk for hepatitis B, were urged to take
the new vaccine, but they stayed away from the product in droves. Dr. Robert
Mendelsohn, Chicago medical heretic, points out that initially the U.S.
Veteran's Administration expected to give 90,000 doses of the hepatitis B
vaccine to its employees around the country. The response rate, though, by
1983, was only 30,000 doses. In the same year, 1,200 University of Illinois
health workers were pressured to take hepatitis B shots. Only 237 did.
In January, 1983, a year before the "AIDS virus was discovered," Dr. John
Finkbeiner, writing in Medical World News, warned that the hepatitis
B vaccine "might be contaminated with a pathogen responsible for the
acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic."
Dr. James Chin, head of Infectious Diseases for California's Dept. of Health
Services, contacted the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and asked for
long-term tracking of hepatitis B vaccinees. His implication was quite
clear: Maybe the vaccine was causing AIDS.
There were other factors that added to public worry. Alan Cantwell, a Los
Angeles physician who authored the book, AIDS, the Mystery and the
Solution, recalls that "the CDC, reporting on the first 26 cases of AIDS
in the U.S., declared that 20 were from New York, and 6 were from San
Francisco and Los Angeles. These were the three cities that carried out the
most extensive early hepatitis B vaccine-trials. Then, all of the first 26
AIDS cases matched the profile of the volunteers in these same
vaccine-trials: male, gay, under 40, well educated, and (mostly) white."
Dr. Cantwell adds: "AIDS was the first time doctors could recall working
with a disease that seemed to be specific for a certain cultural group, i.e.
male homosexuals." Good reason to look for a common environmental factor –
for example, a contaminated vaccine.
In the meantime, throughout the early 1980s, researchers around the world
were scrambling to make a connection between AIDS in Africa, which was
overwhelmingly heterosexual, and AIDS in America. A sketchy scenario
emerged: The AIDS microbe, jumping species from an African green monkey to
an African human, eventually infected Haitians who were living in Central
Africa, probably Zaire. The Haitians took AIDS home with them. It moved into
their male bisexual community, where American homosexuals from New York and
San Francisco picked it up. They had traveled to the "gay playground" of
Haitian clubs on vacation.
There were variations on this plot. One, tentatively advanced by World
Health Organization advisor, Jacques Leibowitch, had it that Cuban soldiers,
hacking their way through the jungles of Angola in the 70s, brought the
incubating AIDS microbe home with them. Eventually, some of these troops who
were gay ended up on the Cuban-boatpeople crew that President Carter let
into the U.S. AIDS spread from them into the American homosexual community.
These cover-story renditions of how AIDS moved had the effect of quelling
fear that "American AIDS" was, in part, due to the hepatitis B vaccine.
Still, to some, the idea of blaming an epidemic on the Cubans sounded like
CIA disinformation.
Finally, a few epidemiologists asked the burning question, "If AIDS came to
Manhattan from Haiti, then why didn't it break out at the same time in New
Orleans and Houston? Gay men from those cities were going to Haiti, too."
So there was good reason, among media monkey-speculations and
quasi-scientific pronouncements on AIDS' origins, to wonder still about a
possible tie between what was being called AIDS and the hepatitis B vaccine.
Dr. Cantwell comments, "I know of no later comprehensive checking of the
vaccine batches given to the volunteers in the early NY, San Francisco, and
LA hepatitis B vaccine-trials. These batches, all of them that are still
available, need to be examined by people who were not involved in the
original trials, vaccine-research, or manufacture."
There was, for example, the famous Cutter Labs polio-vaccine case,
well-documented, in which children contracted polio from Cutter's
vaccinations. Yet in making the polio vaccine, Cutter had purified their
product and inactivated poliovirus according to government regulations. But
children turned out to be more sensitive than the government's requirements.
Cutter paid out $3 million in damages.
Dr. Mathilde Krim, one of the leading lights at the American Foundation for
AIDS Research said to me: "In dealing with pharmaceutical interests...it's
very hard to get into their stocks of (vaccines) and do an examination."
"You mean you'd need a Congressional edict?" I asked.
"That might not even do it," she said.
Money to protect, reputations to guard – these are, of course, basic
economic and human givens. When, beyond that, there are gross errors and
omissions in defending the safety of a medical product, you have to ask how
much trouble there really is below the surface. Concerning the hepatitis B
vaccine� Reliable reports have come in to me that indicate that this vaccine
was toxic, that it suppressed immune systems in the trials run in San
Francisco, LA, and New York. The authorities involved absolutely refuse to
do a comprehensive check on what remains of those test batches of vaccines.
© 2003 by Jon Rappoport
Originally published at
www.stratiawire.com
