Little Old Englandh
A false-flag terror attack has a story with it, a cover story which the media broadcast about who is to blame.This is in effect an intelligence test given to a people – are you dumb enough to believe this?
If you are, then – aargh – life will get worse.
And that means more fear, more surveillance, new wars, bigger ‘security’ industries, more intrusive police…
And you deserved it, yes you did, by failing to demand justice be done, after the atrocity.
Instead, you were given the ‘fairy tale from Hell’ cover story – and you believed it … On British daily news, ‘Terror’ and ‘Al-qaeda’ are now the most common terms, perpetually echoing in the background, that’s how far we have come.
The false-flag terror trick appeals to the worst side of the character of Britons – their belief in the War, their need for the Enemy, their need to be told whom to hate. Will you forever vote more money for the military? If so, don’t be surprised if it brews up certain … stories, to reassure you about the Enemy. Stories with real deaths in them – aye, there’s the rub.
Let’s take a glance at the road-to-hell on which Britain today is now traveling, in consequence of its citizens believing in the 9/11 and 7/7 cover-stories – an across-the-pond view:
‘We all know that Britain has the highest ratio of CCTV cameras to people in the world, but I want to take a closer look at some stories from within the past two months to see at what is going on right now.
British bus passengers could soon be forced to use electronic tags to get onto buses. This fits in with the British government’s move away from paper checks and toward an electronic system to be implemented by 2018. The best part of an electronic bus pass is that it will surely help prevent bus-based terrorism.
Britain is also making sure its schools are safe. Four-year-olds are being monitored for “radicalization” and 5-year-olds are being taught sexual education. After all, there is nothing worse than a sexually naive 5-year-old who is also a terrorist.
British school teachers have also been given the authority to frisk school children and search their school bags for drugs without consent, because we know how seriously Britain takes drug enforcement.
Britain isn’t only making sure its schools are safe. It’s making sure everywhere else is safe as well.
A few months ago, Britain started to put CCTV cameras into the homes of 20,000 “problem families” to make sure that the families raise their children correctly. This is good for keeping people safe indoors, but what about outdoors?
Well, luckily, the government has been going into the homes of willing citizens and placing CCTVs inside to be trained on the street to keep a watch for “anti-social behavior.”
What about inside private establishments? Can we make them as safe as our homes? Well, luckily, now a pub can be closed down if it doesn’t have “sufficient” CCTV coverage. . . . And I was afraid I might actually be alone!
Also, if you are ever lonely, don’t worry, because new CCTV cameras have been outfitted with speakers so they can talk to you. . . . I want them to tell me how pretty I am!
The best thing about these CCTV cameras is that they’re cost-effective. In fact, the top-earning CCTV speeding camera takes in over £420 thousand in fines a year. No wonder people love them so much.
Of course, CCTV isn’t Britain’s only tool against crime, pre-crime, and legal drinking. Britain is also still capable of that “personal touch.” That is why they’ve given 20,000 town hall bureaucrats the power to enter homes without a warrant.
Reasons these bureaucrats can enter include: checking to make sure a house has an “eco-friendly” refrigerator, making sure a hedge is not too high, and making sure no ‘unregulated hypnotism’ is taking place. . . . Regulated hypnotism, of course, is fine.
Cyberspace also got safer when Britain enlisted telecoms to help them spy on every phone call, email and web search British citizens make. This makes people safer because naturally now the government knows what they’re doing.
The information gathered will be available to such important agencies as local councils, the Financial Services Authority, the ambulance service, fire authorities and even prison governors. . . . Finally, ambulance drivers will know what our Google searches have been even if we’re unconscious!
The best news for the police state, however, has been that the criminal code has expanded. Since 1997, 3,000 criminal offenses have been created, 1,472 of which are imprisonable. The number of people over 50 entering the criminal justice system has also risen by almost 50 percent in eight years.
Not only has the criminal code expanded, but the people who have arrest powers has also expanded. In Norwich, mall cops can now arrest people. . . . Sorry, Grandpa, but now it looks like you really are going to have to get out of the massage chair.
Despite all these victories, the police state did suffered one setback during the last two months. Britain was collecting the names, dates of birth and passport details of every passenger entering into and exiting from the country well before they got to the airport, just like any good police state would. But then the EU, which after the ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon has authority to overrule member nations’ criminal laws, disallowed it.’
(Gratitude to Josh Fulton, ‘What’s New in Britain’s police state?’)
Passenger humiliation at airports: BBC promotes conventional x-ray technology to be used on only ’suspicious’ travelers at Newcastle Airport.
Plans for street use of X-ray CCTV cameras X-ray cameras that would “undress” passers-by in a bid to thwart terrorists concealing weapons, could be coming to a street near you, according to reports Millimetre wave machines give more of a three-dimensional image, while terahertz radiation also penetrates clothing. On 3rd January, Prime Minister Gordon Brown has given the go-ahead for full body scanners to be introduced at Britain’s airports, currently being trialled at Manchester airport.
UK ‘relentless pursuit of terrorists’ UK terrorism document says strategy will target al-Qaida 30 Mar 2009 The British government will tackle the threat of terrorism through the relentless pursuit of terrorists and disruption of their plots, according to a document released by the Home office. The Home Office laid out a comprehensive strategy, under the name “CONTEST,” “to reduce the risk to the UK and its interests overseas from international terrorism,” in the report. The threat from ‘al-Qaida,’ and Islamist groups and individuals that al-Qaida seeks to “bring together into a single global movement,” represent the biggest current challenge to the UK, according to the document.
‘One of the four bombers of 7 July was, on the face of it, a model student.’ Police identify 200 children as potential terrorists –Drastic new tactics to prevent school pupils as young as 13 falling into extremism 28 Mar 2009 Two hundred schoolchildren in Britain, some as young as 13, have been identified as potential terrorists by a police scheme that aims to spot youngsters who are “vulnerable” to Islamic radicalisation. The number was revealed to The Independent by Sir Norman Bettison, the chief constable of West Yorkshire Police and Britain’s most senior officer in charge of terror prevention. He said the “Channel project” had intervened in the cases of at least 200 children who were thought to be at risk of extremism, since it began 18 months ago.
And let’s not forget – in 2007, ‘Evidence of extremism in mosques ‘fabricated’’ Guardian 13.12.07
Far-right Tory think-tank exposed as fabricating ‘terror’ stories.
In October 2007 the influential Tory think tank, Policy Exchange, produced a report which hit the headlines. They investigated 100 mosques around Britain and claimed that 25 of them were disseminating extremist literature. They published their report titled: The Hijacking of British Islam claiming that “it was the most comprehensive academic survey of it’s kind”. It was front-page news. Policy Exchange “researchers” apparently visited 100 Mosques and found evidence of extremist literature being sold in 26 of them. They purchased books at these locations and produced receipts to support their claims. The documents were then found to be forged by a Newsnight investigation.
Policy Exchange also sent Newsnight a long legal letter threatening legal action should the film be broadcast. ‘Mr Paxman became more accusatory. “You are claiming that you had evidence that these books had been bought in these mosques, and that evidence is quite clearly, in expert opinion, fabricated,” he said.’ Yep.
Be afraid! Threat level historyJournalists have been wondering what the raising of the government’s ‘how scared should we be’ index kindly provided by HMG for the first time to ‘Severe’ is supposed to mean. It seems to be the first time it has been raised without anything actually happening. It means that an attack is ‘highly likely’ and is the second highest on a five-point scale. Professor Richard Bonney believes the arrival of the U.S. Secretary of State in London next week is why the official level has gone from substantial to severe. ‘ Also the Detroit plot was ‘one of the factors’ behind raising the alert level NB We’re following MI5 in using block capitals and bold for these terms.
- 22 January 2010 = Threat level raised to SEVERE
- 20 July 2009 = Threat level lowered to SUBSTANTIAL
- 4 July 2007 = Threat level lowered to SEVERE
- 30 June 2007 = Threat level raised to CRITICAL
- 14 August 2006 = Threat level lowered to SEVERE
- 10 August 2006 = Threat level raised to CRITICAL
- 1 August 2006 = Threat level published for the first time. = Threat level: SEVERE
Police psychiatrists can now interrogate anyone suspected of ‘terrorism’ via the shadowy new ‘Fixated Threat Assessment Centre’ the secretive new police unit. Once they have been labelled mentally ill, people can be put away without the normal protection of ‘Habeus Corpus’ i.e. the right to a court trial. This unit has a half a million a year budget and can detain persons indefinitely. It sounds very Orwellian.
Soon unmanned military drones will be spying on UK citizens permanently from twenty thousand feet – in case the four million CCTV cameras aren’t enough. In Britain, MI5 and GCHQ already use three planes based at RAF Northolt in North-West London to spy on citizens.
The army may soon be patrolling the streets, according the new Strategic Defense Review, to ‘confront the threat of terrorism.’ They will supposedly promote security and enhance ‘resilience.’ The latter is a term used by companies for their terror-drill rehearsals, and means they have an ability to survive the shock of some catastrophe.
Most British folk believe the army should never be used on the streets. The army on the streets represents the beginning of Martial law, the declaration of a state of emergency.
Ever wonder how to spot a terrorist? Well our government has given some helpful hints in a TV sports ad, on who to report to the police: if your neighbour seems to be enjoying their privacy, using cash rather than a credit card, or if he seems to be drawing curtains when they should be open … if so, you better report them! We quote the irrepressible Alex Jones here:
‘As America and Britain sink deeper into militarized police states, society begins to parallel more and more aspects of Nazi Germany, especially in the context of citizens being turned against each other, which in turn creates a climate of fear and the constraining sense that one is always being watched.’(Reminds me of how people used to be picked out as werewolves in the Middle Ages: such things as having too much hair on the back of one’s hand, or eyebrows too close together… )
Who is creating terror? Let’s look here at how bewildered young children are being exposed at school to mock-terror attacks – without them or their parents being told beforehand: Psychological Attacks Coming To A Primary School Near You : ‘Children arriving at the school in the morning were greeted with a pool of blood and a police crime scene. One female member of staff in on the act pretended to have been assaulted, and the children were tasked to help police in the investigation. The school made no attempt to put the traumatized children’s minds at ease, because the alleged problem solving exercise wasn’t exposed as such until 4 days in to the week!’ One furious parent said: ‘I think it’s disgusting – the children are too frightened to go back to school because it has not been made clear it’s a fictitious incident.’ That is by any standards the construction of terror.
Police now spy on Internet users on cafes as part of the government’s counter-terrorism strategy, which aims to stop ‘radicalisation.’ Presumably such prohibited ’radical’ websites would include this one! And this is merely part of a huge program undertaken by MI5 to train 60,000 UK citizens as a civilian network of terrorist spotters.
We have now reached the stage where a grannie owning a pet shop gets charged with selling a goldfish to a young lad. Not only was she arrested and fined, she was tagged – tagged – for the crime. This is soulless and robotic behaviour. An elderly woman is tricked and trapped by a bunch of male police. It reminds us, of how far police have lost track of the meaning of the word, ‘crime.’
Britain now has the highest violent crime rate in the EU. Over two per minute! France appears to have four times less per capita (or, per thousand citizens).
A NHS hospital has started labelling all newborn babies with barcodes.The computer can quickly read name, date of birth, National insurance number etc, with the barcode strapped to the ankle. This may remind usof how one in three secondary schools now requires fingerprinting of pupils, just for them to register in class or take out library books.
Rage, rage against the dying of the light Do not go gently into that good-night Dylan Thomas
No comments:
Post a Comment