 
  Spain declassifies UFO crash report
         23.01.2009     06:41       

Fragments
 of an unidentified flying object fell down on the territory of Spain in
 1965. The USA took them for the debris of the Soviet Vostok booster 
rocket and asked for adequate documents and materials from the USSR, 
which they subsequently received. Now Spain has declassified the US 
report about the incident. 
It goes about report 
No. T67 94769, which contains eyewitnesses’ account of flashes of light 
which appeared in the sky on December 6, 1965, and about the finding of 
14 units of one or several space objects of unknown origin in Badajoz 
and Sevilla. 
The fragments were found scattered 
on the territory of 100 kilometers. As soon as reports about the 
incident appeared in the local press, the US Embassy in Madrid sent a 
note to then-leader of Spain, Francisco Franco, with a request to send 
the file to the USA. Franco complied with the request in return to the 
information about the results of the research. 
Vicente
 Juan Ballester Olmos, an investigator on the case and the only 
officially known person, who had access to all materials of the case, 
said in an interview with El Mundo newspaper that the report would soon be published on the internet. 
The
 US-based Battelle Memorial Institute presented the 300-page report 
about the examination of five metallic bodies of space origin in June 
1967. The front page of the report indicated that it was a top secret 
document prepared exclusively for the government of Spain. The document 
excluded any opportunity of declassification and said that its content 
posed a threat to the national security of the United States of America.
 
Also read: Video of crashed UFO in Russia leaks from secret KGB files BELOW]
Even
 the renowned Roswell case, which investigates the UFO crash in the USA 
in 1947 and contains the alien autopsy report, did not have such a high 
level of secrecy. 
Report No. T67 94769 
substantiates the existence of ufology. However, none of the five 
reports pertaining to the crashes of UFOs in Spain in 1965 confirmed the
 extraterrestrial origin of the fragments, Olmos said. 
“If
 the defense ministry does not declassify the documents about possible 
contacts with UFOs, it means that the conclusions that were made did not
 favor that version. The found fragments were the parts of the USSR’s 
Vostok booster rocket in this particular case,” said Vicente Olmos, who 
was the only civil person to participate in the declassification of the 
case between 1990 and 1999. 
He said that the 
Soviet Union announced the last launch of its Vostok rocket on March 18,
 1965 . According to this version, the fragments, which fell down on the
 territory of Spain, could not be the parts of a booster rocket. 
As
 a matter of fact, Olmos said, the USSR was conducting secret launches 
of the booster rocket. One of those secret launches was performed 
December 3, 1965. “They launched the rocket with a satellite on board in
 the direction of the Moon. The launch was not successful, and the 
fragments of the SL-6 rocket (Vostok) crashed on the territory of 
Spain,” Vicente Olmos said. 
The report contains 
the detailed description of 14 objects, including a five-kilo metal 
sphere 40 centimeters in diameter, as well as two cylinders 40 cm high 
and 20 cm in diameter. 
The Soviet Union, El Mundo
 wrote, performed a successful launch of the moon robot only in 1970. 
The rover landed on the Moon and transmitted the first images of Earth’s
 natural satellite. In 1965, the USA classified the report in accordance
 with the rules of the Cold War. The Americans wanted to understand if 
the USSR had achieved considerable progress in order to copy some of its
 technical solutions. 
Lubov Lulko
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------- 
RUSSIAN UFO CRASH -- SEE THE VIDEO 
---------------------------------- 
Video of crashed UFO in Russia leaks from secret KGB files
         21.12.2006     08:27       

The documentary
 featured an extensive summary of the footage, the canisters containing 
the footage, and expert analysis from the likes of Stanton Friedman. One
 film expert noted in the documentary that the footage came in an old Soviet
 canister that had information labeled on it that was consistent with 
info written directly on the film reel. The numbers on the film's header
 matched the canisters they came. The header of the film had the crest 
of the KGB on it and 
the term for TOP SECRET as shown in the first few seconds of this 
footage and image to the right. Having real looking alien footage is one
 thing, but including the original film reel & canisters means you 
are extremely close to proving 100% authenticity.This is something that 
has traditionally lacked in other more popular alien videos such as the 
widely known alien autopsy or the alien interview videos. 
Did this UFO Crash actually occur ? 
In
 the documentary, several KGB documents are produced to prove the film 
is authentic along with credible testimony from a former Soviet KGB 
Operative who claims to know about the event. "At first everyone 
believed that those debris were part of some novelty aircraft 
manufactured in the United States or England," said Pavel Klimchenkov a 
former KGB Operative, "but having done some measurements & material 
analysis, we came to the conclusion that none of the domestic or foreign
 manufacturers known to us could have produced this apparatus, at least 
not in the conditions existing on this planet." Along with Pavel's 
testimony, authentic KGB Top Secret
 documents were obtained by the filmmakers. Allegedly costing them $10 
000, the documents described in detail a crash site recovery operation 
of a disc shaped object and organic remains. 
Based
 on the credible testimony, KGB documents, expert film analysis and the 
general 'gut feeling' one gets when watching this interesting crash site
 video, it is safe to assume that this film indeed may be authentic. 
What about the autopsy? This footage will be posted in our second part 
article along with thoughts and analysis. 
Actors, Training Exercises, & Skepticism 
Some
 have put forth the argument that an American Production crew filmed the
 footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web sites claiming
 to know the truth about this footage. To date they have failed to show 
even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film nor any 
statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in this 
film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently filmed. 
Some
 have put forth the argument that an American Production crew filmed the
 footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web sites claiming
 to know the truth about this footage. To date they have failed to show 
even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film nor any 
statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in this 
film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently filmed. 
Another theory suggests the film was a training exercise. Yet no one has produced witnesses verifying this claim. 
One
 skeptical viewpoint suggests that the object's thickness is far to 
small to support any would-be alien pilot. The craft's outer edge as 
seen on the image is only 12 to 36 inches. However, it is not 
necessarily indicative of the overall thickness of the craft. The image 
was taken from the only part in the video sequence where the craft's 
edge is visible. And since the camera never goes behind, there is no way
 to tell how much depth the craft may have on the other side. 
Additionally, if you consider the side facing us may be actually be the 
bottom, we can easily see that this craft can easily fit the traditional
 "flying saucer" shape as demonstrated by the below images. 
In
 this documentary they claim that, since they only were able to acquire 4
 canisters of film, more film footage of this incident is available. 
Such as the entire digging, clean up, and inside the craft 
investigation. To this date, almost a decade after it went public, no 
other videos have surfaced. 
---------------------------------- 
Russian UFO Crash
 Part 1: The Crash Site Video
The Jaw dropping  video below is from a UFO crash site allegedly filmed by the Russian KGB during March of 1969 in the Sverdlovsk region of Russia.
The footage was later obtained from the Russian Black Market by 
filmmakers who then published the documentary, "The Secret KGB UFO 
Files". Did an extraterrestrial spacecraft crash land in this remote region of Russian farmland? 
The documentary featured an extensive summary of the footage, the 
canisters containing the footage,  and expert analysis from the likes of
 Stanton Friedman. One film expert noted in the documentary that the 
footage came in an old Soviet canister that had information labeled on 
it that was consistent with info written directly on the film reel. The 
numbers on the film's header matched the canisters they came. The header
 of the film had the crest of the KGB on it and the term for TOP SECRET 
as shown in the first few seconds of this footage and image to the 
right. Having real looking alien footage is one thing, but including the
 original film reel & canisters means you are extremely close to 
proving 100% authenticity.This is something that has traditionally 
lacked in other more popular alien videos such as the alien autopsy or the alien interview video. 
Interestingly enough, an autopsy of the alleged alien pilot of
 this downed saucer is seen in the documentary film. It will  be 
featured on Alien Video in Part 2 of our small investigation into this 
case. 
Did this UFO Crash actually occur ? 
In the documentary, several KGB documents are produced to prove the 
film is authentic along with credible testimony from a former Soviet KGB
 Operative who claims to know about the event. "At first everyone 
believed that those debris were part of some novelty aircraft 
manufactured in the United States or England," said  Pavel Klimchenkov a
 former KGB Operative, "but having done some measurements & material
 analysis, we came to the conclusion that none of the domestic or 
foreign manufacturers known to us could have produced this apparatus, at
 least not in the conditions existing on this planet." Along with 
Pavel's testimony, authentic KGB Top Secret documents were obtained by 
the filmmakers. Allegedly costing them $10 000, the documents described 
in detail a crash site recovery operation of a disc shaped object and 
organic remains. 
Based on the credible testimony, KGB documents, expert film analysis
 and the general 'gut feeling' one gets when watching this interesting 
crash site video, it is safe to assume that this film indeed may be  
authentic. What about the autopsy?
This footage will be posted in our second part article along with thoughts and analysis.
This footage will be posted in our second part article along with thoughts and analysis.
Actors, Training Exercises, & Skepticism 
Some have put forth the argument that an American Production crew 
filmed the footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web 
sites claiming to know the truth about this footage. To date they have 
failed to show even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film
 nor any statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in
 this film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently 
filmed.
 
     
Note the outer edge thickness
Another theory suggests the film was a training exercise. Yet no one has produced witnesses verifying this claim.
One skeptical viewpoint suggests that the object's thickness is far 
to small to support any would-be alien pilot. Highlighted in the image (
 right ) is the craft's outer edge. While it is  only 12 to 36 inches, 
it is not necessarily indicative of the overall thickness of the craft. 
This particular image was taken from the only part in the video sequence
 where the craft's edge is visible.  And since the camera never goes 
behind, there is no way to tell how much depth the craft may have on the
 other side. Additionally, if you consider the side facing us may be 
actually be the bottom, we can easily see that this craft can easily fit
 the traditional "flying saucer" shape as demonstrated by the below 
images. 
More to Come 
In this documentary they claim that, since they only were able to 
acquire 4 canisters of film, more film footage of this incident is 
available. Such as the entire digging, clean up, and inside the craft 
investigation. To this date, almost a decade  after it went public, no 
other videos have surfaced. Yet...
 
 


 
No comments:
Post a Comment