Spain declassifies UFO crash report
23.01.2009 06:41
Fragments
of an unidentified flying object fell down on the territory of Spain in
1965. The USA took them for the debris of the Soviet Vostok booster
rocket and asked for adequate documents and materials from the USSR,
which they subsequently received. Now Spain has declassified the US
report about the incident.
It goes about report
No. T67 94769, which contains eyewitnesses’ account of flashes of light
which appeared in the sky on December 6, 1965, and about the finding of
14 units of one or several space objects of unknown origin in Badajoz
and Sevilla.
The fragments were found scattered
on the territory of 100 kilometers. As soon as reports about the
incident appeared in the local press, the US Embassy in Madrid sent a
note to then-leader of Spain, Francisco Franco, with a request to send
the file to the USA. Franco complied with the request in return to the
information about the results of the research.
Vicente
Juan Ballester Olmos, an investigator on the case and the only
officially known person, who had access to all materials of the case,
said in an interview with El Mundo newspaper that the report would soon be published on the internet.
The
US-based Battelle Memorial Institute presented the 300-page report
about the examination of five metallic bodies of space origin in June
1967. The front page of the report indicated that it was a top secret
document prepared exclusively for the government of Spain. The document
excluded any opportunity of declassification and said that its content
posed a threat to the national security of the United States of America.
Also read: Video of crashed UFO in Russia leaks from secret KGB files BELOW]
Even
the renowned Roswell case, which investigates the UFO crash in the USA
in 1947 and contains the alien autopsy report, did not have such a high
level of secrecy.
Report No. T67 94769
substantiates the existence of ufology. However, none of the five
reports pertaining to the crashes of UFOs in Spain in 1965 confirmed the
extraterrestrial origin of the fragments, Olmos said.
“If
the defense ministry does not declassify the documents about possible
contacts with UFOs, it means that the conclusions that were made did not
favor that version. The found fragments were the parts of the USSR’s
Vostok booster rocket in this particular case,” said Vicente Olmos, who
was the only civil person to participate in the declassification of the
case between 1990 and 1999.
He said that the
Soviet Union announced the last launch of its Vostok rocket on March 18,
1965 . According to this version, the fragments, which fell down on the
territory of Spain, could not be the parts of a booster rocket.
As
a matter of fact, Olmos said, the USSR was conducting secret launches
of the booster rocket. One of those secret launches was performed
December 3, 1965. “They launched the rocket with a satellite on board in
the direction of the Moon. The launch was not successful, and the
fragments of the SL-6 rocket (Vostok) crashed on the territory of
Spain,” Vicente Olmos said.
The report contains
the detailed description of 14 objects, including a five-kilo metal
sphere 40 centimeters in diameter, as well as two cylinders 40 cm high
and 20 cm in diameter.
The Soviet Union, El Mundo
wrote, performed a successful launch of the moon robot only in 1970.
The rover landed on the Moon and transmitted the first images of Earth’s
natural satellite. In 1965, the USA classified the report in accordance
with the rules of the Cold War. The Americans wanted to understand if
the USSR had achieved considerable progress in order to copy some of its
technical solutions.
Lubov Lulko
-------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
RUSSIAN UFO CRASH -- SEE THE VIDEO
----------------------------------
Video of crashed UFO in Russia leaks from secret KGB files
21.12.2006 08:27
The documentary
featured an extensive summary of the footage, the canisters containing
the footage, and expert analysis from the likes of Stanton Friedman. One
film expert noted in the documentary that the footage came in an old Soviet
canister that had information labeled on it that was consistent with
info written directly on the film reel. The numbers on the film's header
matched the canisters they came. The header of the film had the crest
of the KGB on it and
the term for TOP SECRET as shown in the first few seconds of this
footage and image to the right. Having real looking alien footage is one
thing, but including the original film reel & canisters means you
are extremely close to proving 100% authenticity.This is something that
has traditionally lacked in other more popular alien videos such as the
widely known alien autopsy or the alien interview videos.
Did this UFO Crash actually occur ?
In
the documentary, several KGB documents are produced to prove the film
is authentic along with credible testimony from a former Soviet KGB
Operative who claims to know about the event. "At first everyone
believed that those debris were part of some novelty aircraft
manufactured in the United States or England," said Pavel Klimchenkov a
former KGB Operative, "but having done some measurements & material
analysis, we came to the conclusion that none of the domestic or foreign
manufacturers known to us could have produced this apparatus, at least
not in the conditions existing on this planet." Along with Pavel's
testimony, authentic KGB Top Secret
documents were obtained by the filmmakers. Allegedly costing them $10
000, the documents described in detail a crash site recovery operation
of a disc shaped object and organic remains.
Based
on the credible testimony, KGB documents, expert film analysis and the
general 'gut feeling' one gets when watching this interesting crash site
video, it is safe to assume that this film indeed may be authentic.
What about the autopsy? This footage will be posted in our second part
article along with thoughts and analysis.
Actors, Training Exercises, & Skepticism
Some
have put forth the argument that an American Production crew filmed the
footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web sites claiming
to know the truth about this footage. To date they have failed to show
even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film nor any
statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in this
film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently filmed.
Some
have put forth the argument that an American Production crew filmed the
footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web sites claiming
to know the truth about this footage. To date they have failed to show
even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film nor any
statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in this
film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently filmed.
Another theory suggests the film was a training exercise. Yet no one has produced witnesses verifying this claim.
One
skeptical viewpoint suggests that the object's thickness is far to
small to support any would-be alien pilot. The craft's outer edge as
seen on the image is only 12 to 36 inches. However, it is not
necessarily indicative of the overall thickness of the craft. The image
was taken from the only part in the video sequence where the craft's
edge is visible. And since the camera never goes behind, there is no way
to tell how much depth the craft may have on the other side.
Additionally, if you consider the side facing us may be actually be the
bottom, we can easily see that this craft can easily fit the traditional
"flying saucer" shape as demonstrated by the below images.
In
this documentary they claim that, since they only were able to acquire 4
canisters of film, more film footage of this incident is available.
Such as the entire digging, clean up, and inside the craft
investigation. To this date, almost a decade after it went public, no
other videos have surfaced.
----------------------------------
Russian UFO Crash
Part 1: The Crash Site Video
The Jaw dropping video below is from a UFO crash site allegedly filmed by the Russian KGB during March of 1969 in the Sverdlovsk region of Russia.
The footage was later obtained from the Russian Black Market by
filmmakers who then published the documentary, "The Secret KGB UFO
Files". Did an extraterrestrial spacecraft crash land in this remote region of Russian farmland?
The documentary featured an extensive summary of the footage, the
canisters containing the footage, and expert analysis from the likes of
Stanton Friedman. One film expert noted in the documentary that the
footage came in an old Soviet canister that had information labeled on
it that was consistent with info written directly on the film reel. The
numbers on the film's header matched the canisters they came. The header
of the film had the crest of the KGB on it and the term for TOP SECRET
as shown in the first few seconds of this footage and image to the
right. Having real looking alien footage is one thing, but including the
original film reel & canisters means you are extremely close to
proving 100% authenticity.This is something that has traditionally
lacked in other more popular alien videos such as the alien autopsy or the alien interview video.
Interestingly enough, an autopsy of the alleged alien pilot of
this downed saucer is seen in the documentary film. It will be
featured on Alien Video in Part 2 of our small investigation into this
case.
Did this UFO Crash actually occur ?
In the documentary, several KGB documents are produced to prove the
film is authentic along with credible testimony from a former Soviet KGB
Operative who claims to know about the event. "At first everyone
believed that those debris were part of some novelty aircraft
manufactured in the United States or England," said Pavel Klimchenkov a
former KGB Operative, "but having done some measurements & material
analysis, we came to the conclusion that none of the domestic or
foreign manufacturers known to us could have produced this apparatus, at
least not in the conditions existing on this planet." Along with
Pavel's testimony, authentic KGB Top Secret documents were obtained by
the filmmakers. Allegedly costing them $10 000, the documents described
in detail a crash site recovery operation of a disc shaped object and
organic remains.
Based on the credible testimony, KGB documents, expert film analysis
and the general 'gut feeling' one gets when watching this interesting
crash site video, it is safe to assume that this film indeed may be
authentic. What about the autopsy?
This footage will be posted in our second part article along with thoughts and analysis.
This footage will be posted in our second part article along with thoughts and analysis.
Actors, Training Exercises, & Skepticism
Some have put forth the argument that an American Production crew
filmed the footage in March 1998. These claims are put forth on web
sites claiming to know the truth about this footage. To date they have
failed to show even one current photo of any of the soldiers in the film
nor any statements from the actors that they were indeed only actors in
this film. This should be easy to obtain if the footage was recently
filmed.
Note the outer edge thickness
Another theory suggests the film was a training exercise. Yet no one has produced witnesses verifying this claim.
One skeptical viewpoint suggests that the object's thickness is far
to small to support any would-be alien pilot. Highlighted in the image (
right ) is the craft's outer edge. While it is only 12 to 36 inches,
it is not necessarily indicative of the overall thickness of the craft.
This particular image was taken from the only part in the video sequence
where the craft's edge is visible. And since the camera never goes
behind, there is no way to tell how much depth the craft may have on the
other side. Additionally, if you consider the side facing us may be
actually be the bottom, we can easily see that this craft can easily fit
the traditional "flying saucer" shape as demonstrated by the below
images.
More to Come
In this documentary they claim that, since they only were able to
acquire 4 canisters of film, more film footage of this incident is
available. Such as the entire digging, clean up, and inside the craft
investigation. To this date, almost a decade after it went public, no
other videos have surfaced. Yet...
No comments:
Post a Comment