Killtown
Air vs. Skyscraper (video)
COMMENT. About the shutter speed: NTSC video has a constant frame rate of 30
frames per second. The video camera takes a snapshot of the action
exactly every 1/30 of a second. In PAL video the camera takes a snapshot
of the action exactly every 1/25 of a second. The frame rate has to be
constant, and it always is constant; In this example the frame rate is
constant too, otherwise we should see the 'plane' jumping across the
screen on a randomized speed (velocity), which is clearly not the case.
Just cut out some frames of your vacation movie and look at it! Then
you'll see what I mean.
Furthermore, who the hell is going to
change the frame rate of the camera at the precise moment the 'plane'
hit the building?? And even more important: Why??? Just an intend to
cover up the reality? Strange. BTW the result would be exactly the same
because, even if the shutter speed was changed to 60 frames/second, we
should see the same snapshots at every 1/30 of a second. Because that's
the exact position of the plane at every 1/30 of a second, no matter how
many snapshots were captured in between. So the motion of the 'plane'
we see on this video violates the first and third law of motion by
Newton. This is just one of the many, many anomalies regarding 9/11. Do
you still believe 9/11 was just a sequence of miracles? I don't.
Watch
out for all the diversions and limited hangouts planted in the crime to
entertain the controlled opposition as long as possible. They will
never(!), never(!), never(!) go to court!
--------------------------------
Zero Interaction Physics or Zero Crash Physics
In
looking over some of the CGI videos of the second tower hit, I
realized that perhaps no one before has summarized some matters of what
is and isn’t on these CGI videos. And that this summary is also a
good, accurate catch phrase for the 9/11 truth community.
Now
many have stated that the videos of the “second hit” show impossible
crash physics. In a sense this is very true. But that summary may beg
the issue. After all what do we have on these CGI videos? I suggest we
focus now on the tower. I assert that we have NO INTERACTION PHYSICS or
NO CRASH PHYSICS!
In
the first few “plane entering tower” frames of the videos, what some
have called “melding” occurs. That is the front part of the plane
appears to DISAPPEAR into the tower--without ANY interaction of the
tower. Very importantly, I could state this better WITHOUT THE WORD
“INTO,” as I assert this CGI video just has the plane image
sequentially disappear, and not “into” anything! Now one video, the Spiegel [German TV] video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-hlbw4a40Q
has a close-up view from the side. It purports to show a flash at the
surface of the tower just before the plane “enters.” This led to the
hangout/distraction of pods and missiles fired. Then the Hezarkhani
video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stdfd6hLGWA
of the frontal view shows--in the first frames--the “melding” or
disappearing of the front of the plane, along with first a white puff
or two, and later frames have gray puffs.
But the curious thing is two-fold.
1. First all these puffs appear to be at the surface of the tower.
2. Nothing is shown to happen to the tower, at least while the front half of the plane is “entering.”
Thus
all these puffs appear to be painted onto the tower’s surface. This
includes the alleged “missile fired from pod” bright orange puffball
(seen from the side), and the white and then gray puffballs seen from
the front. All the puffballs do not have any accompanying tower damage
at all. No tower damage can be seen until much later in these GCI
videos. They contain zero interaction physics or zero crash physics.
Both the above side and front videos merely have puffballs painted on
to the surface of the tower--until after about half the plane or more
has “entered.” The side view has only the initial orange puffball. It’s
either pretending to be a pre-entry puffball, or the initial contact
moment. Then there are no other puffballs until much of the plane has
“entered.” And no interaction physics as well.
Now the tower CANNOT have waited to display interaction physics--
pieces breaking off, or bending, some going inward some possibly even
breaking off and falling out and such-- or crash physics. In the real
world, it would be there from the instant the tip of the nosecone hit
the tower. And puffballs painted onto the surface of the tower do not constitute interaction physics.
I have also written that from the moment of a real plane hitting the 4
inch steel of the tower, a shockwave would have traveled down the
plane at 5000 mph and would have deformed the back of the plane almost
instantaneously or caused it to break off. http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/06/further-proving-911-plane-hits-are.html So the plane also shows zero interaction physics or zero crash physics.
So
no attempt to show the interaction of the plane and tower was employed
in the CGI software used to create the second hit “videos.” Simplistic
puffballs were painted on to the SURFACE of the tower. And at least
for the first half of the ”second plane” disappearing into the tower,
there is zero interaction physics or zero crash physics, not merely
impossible crash physics.
Now
a method used in the analysis of the Zapruder film of the Kennedy
Assassination might be useful here. Except of course, it may not be
needed, or work here. Why? Because the Zapruder film versions that we
are allowed to see, at least had their origin in a real film, whereas
the WTC/9/11 “second hit videos” appear to be entirely CGI. Now all
real JFK researchers know that the Zapruder film versions that we are
allowed to see have been massively doctored. There are many missing
frames, and altered frames, and a moving background is added in, when
the limousine was brought to a halt, and much else. I have seen some 15
versions or more--none of which is accurate based on eyewitness
testimony. But some Z-frames are relevant here.
Frame 313 http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z313.jpg
is the fatal head shot frame; and you can even see the end of the gun
of the shooter/driver, SS [Secret Service] agent, William Greer, as the
it goes past the curvature of the head of S.S. agent Kellerman. The
side flap, the back of the head, and the spray coming off the head of
Kennedy have been analyzed, and are predominantly bogus. Here are
frames 321 http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z321.jpg , and 335 http://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z335.jpg
to make this clear. Now the side flap is known to be painted in
because of both analysis and the eyewitness accounts from the Parkland
Hospital doctors and Bethesda autopsy viewers. But my main point here
is that some of these frames show an intact back of Kennedy’s head when
numerous witnesses, again at Parkland and Bethesda, have stated that a
good portion of the back of his skull was missing. And dot density
analysis was used to verify this. That is, Kennedy’s brown hair was
found, in these painted in frames, to be far more black than anything
else in the frames that really was black. The black dot density [black
dots per square millimeter] of JFK’s back of head far superseded
anything in the frames that really was black.
Some type of similar analysis of the various puffballs could be attempted by the experts in this regard. Of
course, this discussion indicates it isn’t even necessary as there is
zero interaction physics or zero crash physics of the tower and the
plane for at least the first half of the plane “entering” the tower.
And we are apparently dealing with total CGI here. Adding on puffballs
of differing colors to the SURFACE of the tower does not afford
interaction physics or crash physics at all! That is the tower remains PRISTINE for far too long a time.
While
some could analyze all these painted on surface puffballs, the terms
zero interaction physics or zero crash physics should be employed by
actual 9/11 truthers, as it may be stronger, more relevant and more
understandable than saying impossible crash physics. And it should also
be proclaimed that the tower on these fake CGI videos remains PRISTINE
for far too long a time to remind people we are dealing with the same
monsters that should have been eradicated when they killed President
Kennedy, and invented the pristine bullet. It too claimed to be
pristine and show no interaction despite the claim that it hit some five
bones in two people.
And BTW, for those who still doubt that no
planes hit the towers on 9/11, consider the following. You can be sure
that the perpetrators-- the Regime’s military and intel agencies-- took
many videos of what they were doing (for various reasons). Likely
they took videos from their helicopters and planes flying nearby or
overhead, from satellites, and from intel assets in nearby buildings,
and on the ground. If ANY of them showed real planes, and real interaction physics, they would have released these by now.
This, together with how numerous people have done fine work for over
five years now documenting that all the released videos are bogus CGI,
cements the case.
I
should include that I have no doubt that the regime could have put
better CGI on TV. See for example, the 1997 movie “Contact.” When the
first huge worm-hole device is destroyed, one piece of it is exploded,
and falls onto the rest of it. There is much INSTANTANEOUS
interaction physics simulated, and it looks pretty real-- even though
the structure is quite elaborate, and entirely CGI. Now the regime,
some four years later, and with likely vastly superior CGI capability
at its intel agencies, could have put plane hit videos, on TV, that
contained some, or much, interaction physics, but chose not to.
This
has traditionally been the case with their most dastardly deeds. With
the Kennedy Assassination, the Pearl Harbor set-up, Gulf of Tonkin
non-incident, the Apollo Hoax, and other events, either at the time
they happened, or some time thereafter, everything the Gov’t says is a
lie, and often a physical impossibility-- and this is clear to the
intelligentsia. Those who can think and change can see this. But most
people cannot easily think and change; and that difficulty is created
and enforced by the Govt, the media, education, religion, etc. I saw
Spooked recently put up an acronym for this-- MITOP: Made It
Transparent On Purpose.
It
agrees with what I have written. From the beginning, I have cited
everything from the jet’s wings blinking in and out of existence, to
the words of videographer, Evan Fairbanks, when he got his video from
the FBI and saw that the jet/tower interaction looked like “bad special
effects,” to Larry Silverstein’s “pull it” WTC7 quote, that the PTB
were telling the intelligentsia that the regime itself were the
perpetrators. MITOP is meant to instill fear, helplessness, depression,
schizoid behavior, and ultimately paralysis in those who can think and
change, so as to try to stop them from ACTING on what they have
realized. The way to counter this is to ACT.
For now please consider using these new terms for what is claimed during the planes first half “entry”/disappearance:
Zero Interaction Physics or
Zero Crash Physics
Pristine Tower
-------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment