by The Anonymous Physicist
The reason is that there are numerous differences between the two events. My “many nukes” hypothesis for WTC destruction contains the concepts of redundant nukes, fratricided and fizzled nukes. Please read the above archived articles to understand just what attempting to explode many small nukes in the enclosed buildings entails, and even my hypothesis that the early explosions in WTC7 likely were fizzled micro-nukes. Now for some specific, relevant differences. Hiroshima was just one fission nuclear bomb, not many as with the WTC. Redundant, fratricided and fizzled nukes are not relevant to the events of Hiroshima, unlike the WTC. Finally, Hiroshima did not have a China Syndrome Aftermath because the A-bomb went off at an altitude of about 1800 feet, and IN OPEN AIR-- NOT IN THE CENTERS OF BUILDINGS NOR THEIR BASEMENTS.
The Hiroshima nuke was, of course, much larger than the sum of the numerous micro-nukes employed to destroy the WTC. As I have detailed, a fission nuke uses up only some 1-6% of its fissile material in its chain reactions before the remainder is blown apart from the heat and pressure resulting from the chain reactions. The 80 generations of fission chain reaction take but a total of one microsecond before the bomb’s contents themselves are blown apart. In the open air, much of the micro-fragments of the remainder 94-99% of the fissile material (Uranium-235) were in the fireball, and much of this rose further with the fireball. But these heavy Uranium atoms fell back down. Some dispersed into the upper atmosphere, and would come down around the world. (Note that no Gov’t has released atmospheric radiation data in the days after 9/11/01--this is perhaps both telling [of the worldwide collusion of regimes] and sad.) At Hiroshima, they came down in notorious fashion. Much of the remaining Uranium fissioning atoms came down 30 minutes later in the so-called “Black Rain.” Many more people may have died because they suffered desperate thirst from their dehydrated condition in part from damaged, melted, hanging skin; and they drank the black rain, as there no longer was running water. They thus ingested radioactive particles. (The worst thing they could have done.)
There was no known China Syndrome Aftermath at Hiroshima because the Uranium atoms came down over a widely dispersed area; and thus were not concentrated enough to have heat generating effect in any known areas. Note that I have detailed that at Hiroshima, radiation levels on the ground were low enough so that American troops were there performing various tasks within a few days. At the WTC, the micro-nukes (emplaced in the centers) were chosen small enough so as to not vaporize the outer structure (and give the Op-Plan away). So as the micro-nukes were going off at each level and in the sub-basement area, the outer structure was still extant for the most part. Also there was no fireball under these conditions that rose to 15,000 feet or so. Just as there were no fireballs seen in all the underground nuclear tests. And there was no rain for several days. The heavy Uranium atoms and fragments, if in the dust, would have come down first, with all the many lighter elements coming down on top of them soon thereafter. This effect may even have provided some radiation shielding. Much of the rubble pile was indeed hot, and led to such phenomena as melted firemen’s and dog’s boots; and the need to hose down the rubble pile for many weeks and months, with countless photos showing the steam emanation that resulted. Fratricided or fizzled nukes and the more totally enclosed sub-basement effect would have left more concentrated fission fragments in some areas and in the former basements. These would later give rise to massive temperatures and molten metal weeks and months later, as detailed in the above-cited archived articles.
Indeed, I would assert that the floors that were chosen for the initial explosions, (the “official,” but CGI “plane hit” floors), were chosen precisely because they still provided enough height and building material so that the first nukes going off at their top-most level would not vaporize through to the top! That could have allowed a visible rising fireball that had to be avoided. In other words, if the first nuke, in the top-down demolition, occurred at or near the top floor, it could have vaporized through to the outside air and a visible fireball could have then ensued. So the floors for the “plane hit” explosions were carefully chosen to coincide with the placement of the initial nukes to go off. This logic also dictates that if there were no planes, it is also highly unlikely that missiles hit the towers either. Anything hitting the towers could have jeopardized both the smaller shape charges to go off-- and create the so-called plane-shaped holes; and also if the wrong floor were hit, it could have interfered with the planned start of the top-down nuclear demolition, although some redundancy was probably built in.
But we should also never forget at least one similarity between Hiroshima and the WTC. Just as many people close to the Hiroshima hypocenter were vaporized, over 1100 human beings in the WTC towers were so vaporized that no intact strands of DNA could be used for identification. But fortunately there was one major difference in the aftermath, there was no widely dispersed, radioactive “black rain” to ingest or have fall upon people. The people of Japan have never forgotten their “black rain,” nor their Hiroshima that was perpetrated by the same regime, primarily against innocent women, children and old men (despite the American propaganda efforts to imply otherwise). Likewise it must be the task for Americans to learn what this same regime did to the innocent human beings in the World Trade Center and the 40,000 responders, and the many nearby Metro New York residents and workers.
The terms Hiroshima and World Trade Center need to become synonymous. And the world needs to come together to counter this same monstrous regime before it kills all or most of humanity!
"Further Revelations on Molten Steel and High Temperatures, and the China Syndrome at the WTC"
From the Anonymous Physicist:
My previous WTC7, and other articles, on the nuclear demolition of the WTC here and at wtcdemolition.blogspot.com detailed the mechanism for the high temperatures and molten steel at the WTC, both photographed and witnessed up to five months later. What my articles did, and what no one else in the 911 truth movement apparently has done-- except William Tahil-- is to state that there had to have been a source for GENERATING heat at the WTC, and to propose such a mechanism. This is because the "collapse," or destruction, mechanisms proposed, in and of themselves, do not provide for such high temperatures weeks and months later. The mechanism was revealed to be the China Syndrome of high heat generating, nuclear reacting fragments, arising from the interactions of building-destroying mini-nuclear bombs, either with other unexploded nukes, or nuclear reactors present.
It is fascinating to see all the disinformation regarding the very high temperatures and molten steel weeks and months after 9/11, at the WTC. Let us examine what all the 911 non-nuclear demolition theorists have to say in this regard. The regime/media "collapse" mechanism of planes/fuel/gravity/pancaking does not allow for such high temperatures weeks and months later. So the MSM, and the regime's 911 Commission report hide any mention of this. They simply ignore it, or say there was no evidence of molten steel, as this NIST "investigator" does here. The government (the actual perps), was also very active in destroying any proof of high temperatures after the 9/11 event-such as altering the second AVIRIS data set.
Then we have the DEW theory. Here I have been told, the proponents of this theory act similarly to the regime. They state that all the firefighters and other responders who were eyewitnesses (and who had nothing to gain, and perhaps much to lose with their accounts) are wrong, or deliberate disinfo agents. And some DEW proponents claim that all the photos showing molten steel are doctored in some way, such as alleging color enhancement. The DEW proponents also know that any beam weapons used on 9/11 (of which no hard evidence has been presented, even though it is not impossible for beam weapons to have been used in some way during the "collapse" phase) could not account for such high temperatures and molten steel weeks and months later. So they claim that all the eyewitnesses and photos, and other data are false. In other words, if it doesn't fit their DEW hypothesis (of which there is no evidence), then any countering evidence against DEW is said to be "bogus" even if the eyewitnesses are irrefutable, and photos and other data support them.
Then we come to the thermite theory. Here the disinfo nuclear physicist (i.e. Dr. Steven Jones) knows full well that only the nuclear reactions of the China Syndrome could account for all the high temperatures and molten steel weeks and months later, so he has taken a different tack from the above two. He was quick to claim the molten steel for himself and his thermite theory! Remember we are now discussing this molten aspect weeks and months later, not on 9/11 itself. So let let me dispose of this ludicrous claim that thermite used on 9/11 could be the source of great heat months later. This Youtube video of thermite ignition shows it to be cooled off in minutes--and not weeks and months. Notice how, after just a few minutes, the thermite residue stops glowing; and a person can safely touch its container and the ground near it. It has cooled off in minutes.
Now let us see that one reporting source has stated that the very high temperatures were at the surface of the WTC, not five, but SIX, months after 9/11. Here is an article, in GCN (Government Computer News--a trade newsletter on the government IT field). The article is about firefighters/responders' computer cataloging of 7000 human remains found at the WTC from 9/25/01 to 5/30/02. It states that, "For six months after Sept. 11, the ground temperature varied between 600 degrees Fahrenheit and 1,500 degrees, sometimes higher." And furthermore, it notes that, "In the first few weeks, sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel." Note that the "1500 degree F, sometimes higher" is said to be the "ground temperature." Again indicating that the heat source, underground, must be at a significantly higher temperature-- as there was nothing visible there, at the surface, causing this heat. This is also another proof of my earlier assertion, made here, that the second set of AVIRIS data announced must be fraudulent. Recall that the second set of data, allegedly taken on 9/23/07, but not released for 19 days, claimed that there were only 3 or 4 spots with greatly diminished temperatures left at the WTC-- as compared to the dozens of hotpsots at temperatures up to 1340 degrees taken on 9/16/01. This article further demonstrates that high temperatures were at the surface of the WTC six months later.
I previously cited Bronx firefighter/responder, Joe O'Toole stating that he saw molten steel in February, 2002 -- five months later. The GCN article now brings "1500 degree temperature, sometimes higher" to SIX months after 9/11. This is further proof of heat GENERATING sources underground-- namely the China Syndrome. That is, as already detailed here, there were fragmented nuclear reacting criticalities, that needed no oxygen to generate high temperatures, almost indefinitely, until "cleaned up"-- PERHAPS BY UNSUSPECTING, UNINFORMED, UNPROTECTED HUMAN BEINGS. So we are now into March 2002 for the China Sydrome still occurring at the WTC.
Interesting that only two months after this March, 2002 date, the "clean-up" was declared officially over. Could the clean-up only have been declared to be over, on 5/30/02, because all the China Syndrome fragments had been recovered by then? Will all the now-unfolding thyroid, blood, lymph, and other cancers among the firefighters, and other responders, at the WTC, be further proof of their exposure to the radiation of the China Syndrome at the WTC? These cancers are highly unlikely to arise from "inhaling asbestos" or other toxins; they are commonly related to exposure at radiation-releasing sites-Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, and the latest Ground Zero: the World Trade Center. And if these firefighters/responders wore masks/respirators, it would even more strongly lead to the conclusion that their cancers are from radiation, not inhalation of toxins.
Once again, I assert that the high temperature hotpsots ("1500 degrees, sometimes higher") revealed in this article, to be present until at least March, 2002 could only have been caused by the GENERATION of heat from nuclear reacting criticality sites underground-- the China Syndrome. The over 40,000 WTC responders must be provided with this crucial information. They, and their physicians, must be told of their radiation exposure. Let their subsequent outrage upon learning this "ultimate truth", and the outrage of their families, CAUSE--as heroic New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison put it (and as now appears on his headstone)--"JUSTICE [to] BE DONE, OR THE HEAVENS FALL."