Amy Goodman, Left Gatekeeper
…at just this moment it had been announced that Oceania was not after all at war with Eurasia. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Eurasia was an ally… There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place. Merely it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy. (George Orwell, 1984)
[Editor's Note: To the casual listener, Amy Goodman sounds good on her program Democracy Now! which I hear locally on Pacifica radio (KPFK) out of Los Angeles. She comes across as someone who's anxious to expose all of the horrors of the Bush administration, especially when it comes to the invasion of Iraq and its aftermath.All well and good, but there are a number of stories that she doesn't cover and of greater importance, she seems to be carrying the party line on certain topics like Global Warming and 'Peak Oil' (she co-authored a book with her brother which supports the Michael Ruppert disinfo camp on Peak Oil (E.g., the world is rapidly run out of oil) and her unwillingness to face up to the undeniable physics of 9-11. You might be interested to know that her program, Democracy Now!, is funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Coincidence? Another funding source to be converned about is The Ford Foundation, a cover operation for CIA sponsored projects-including disinformation.Update: Sep 27, 2005: Since we're on the topic of left gatekeepers, you might want to read these exposes of Noam Chomsky as well..Ken]By Scott Loughrey
August 27, 2005, Originally posted in Fall of 2003Amy Goodman should be regarded as a Left Gatekeeper (LG). Left Gatekeepers, like the journalists in George Orwell’s 1984, function to promote the official propaganda of the state. They amplify what is not credible while excluding other voices from challenging the government’s lies of the day.Amy Goodman used to be a hero of mine (http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/media_jun02.html). She was particularly heroic in the 1991 massacre by Indonesian military forces in a Santa Cruz, East Timor graveyard. Her deeds there (along with journalist Alan Nairn’s) are the kinds of events that people would get medals for by the President in a sane world.However, since 9/11/01 Amy Goodman (and her internet/radio program Democracy Now!) has achieved enormous popularity while continuing to fail to challenge the Bush regime where doing so is most needed. In particular, whenever the topic of terrorism on US soil is brought up on her program she can be counted upon to repeat government propaganda.By broadcasting the government’s official story of 9-11 Democracy Now! continues to reiterate faulty science. For example, a key component of the Bush regime’s propaganda includes the implication that the number 650 is equal to the number 2000.If more Democracy-activists were aware that the Bush regime was making this assertion it could galvanize the resistance to it. Still, Amy Goodman and DN! continue to tolerate the lie that the two numbers are equal. To the disgust of a growing number of people DN! refuses to include a guest on her show which disputes this (and similar) scientific point(s) advanced by the government.
Before we delve into the specifics of Amy Goodman’s service to the Bush regime, it should be mentioned that her contract with Pacifica is appalling. I have it from names that would like to remain quiet that the financial relationship between Democracy Now! and Pacifica is costing Pacifica more than million dollars in potential revenue a year. If the arrangement that Amy and Democracy Now! has with Pacifica continues, it could bankrupt Pacifica. Progressives should show support for Pacifica by calling for Amy to restructure her contract.The Importance of 9-11
Let’s move to the events of September 11, 2001 which have had an enormous impact on the human race. So far the Bush regime has used 911 to launch two wars of aggression against a pair of largely defenseless countries which play a vital role in the distribution of the world’s oil.Domestically, the Bush regime has used the events of 9/11/01 to install a concentration camp in Cuba. Under the guise of protecting Americans from terrorists, it employed the USA PATRIOT Act to shred the Bill of Rights. It has used 9-11 to disappear thousands of people (i.e., either deporting them or is detaining them indefinitely without charge.)
The Bush regime is also using 9-11 in an attempt to introduce new legal standards which erase centuries of judicial precedents. September 11 is also being featured in the campaign commercials for the Bush regime. Finally, the Republican Convention will be held in New York close to the three-year anniversary of 9/11 to maximize the propaganda benefit of the tragedy. Clearly, 9-11 remains a pivotal instrument for the Bush regime to achieve its goals.While the Bush regime freely employs 9-11 for all of its attacks on human rights much of the “left” media continues to broadcast the fictional story of what really happened that day. Left Gatekeepers like Democracy Now! continue to validate the official story of 9-11 and prevent any voice from speaking about some of the innumerable anomalies with it.Democracy Now’s 9-11 “debate”
Last September (9/23/03), Democracy Now! made one of its very rare forays into discussing the events of 9-11. Amy Goodman had on two guests, Peter Lance and Richard Miniter. Amy billed the meeting as a “debate”. Both men are authors and were prominently hawking their recent books. Crucially, neither man contradicted the other much.During the telecast, Lance and Miniter both agreed with the official story of 9/11/01. To recap: Flights 11 and 175 crash into the World Trade Center. Burning fuel from these planes melts the steel in the North and South Towers. This causes both towers to collapse in relatively tidy footprints.
Later that same day, World Trade Center 7 collapses in its footprint, possibly from fire. (No one with the government has explained WTC 7’s collapse with certainty; i.e., FEMA’s report isn’t conclusive. Meanwhile, the subject of why WTC 7 collapsed has never been discussed on Democracy Now!)With Amy’s approval, Lance and Miniter eagerly promote the central idea that Al Qaeda was responsible for the complete destruction of buildings 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the World Trade Center on 9/11/01.
They accept (without explanation) that Osama bin Laden, the world’s most famous dialysis patient, was the mastermind of the day’s tragic events. The subject of how 650 and 2,000 are completely different numbers never arises in the broadcast.Democracy Now!’s wretched 9/23/03 broadcast with Lance and Miniter outraged activists around the world. (Someone the author corresponds with now labels DN! as “Disinformation Now!”)
While watching the Lance and Miniter show unravel, I marveled at the skill with which Goodman and Democracy Now! were communicating ideas which originated with the Bush regime. No White House spokesperson could have sold the official story better than Goodman, Lance and Miniter did that day. In addition, since this “debate” was aired, the subject matter is apparently closed for all time on Democracy Now!
Left Gatekeeper 650 = 2000
Amy Goodman needs to allow an articulate guest to appear on her program capable of mentioning that it is impossible for burning jet fuel to have caused the destruction of the North and South towers of the World Trade Center.
Jet fuel is refined kerosene, which burns at about 650 degrees Fahrenheit in the open air. Meanwhile, steel cannot be forged adequately until it is heated up to 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit for a significant amount of time.Another problem with the idea that burning kerosene melted the steel in the Twin Towers is the fact that that all of the extant documentation from 9-11 reveals black, oxygen-starved fires coming from the North Tower before it collapsed. There is no photograph or video which indicates that the fires were nearing the temperature to melt aluminum, much less the temperature to melt steel.The more one inspects the documentation the more obvious the conclusion becomes that the planes which supposedly struck the World Trade Center on 9/11/01 could not have melted the steel in the Twin Towers under the circumstances we all seemingly witnessed.Even if we could believe that the laws of physics were altered on 9/11/01, and burning jet fuel melted steel that day, the jet fuel from the alleged planes would have caused the towers to twist and bend and fall over, not completely implode in their footprints.The tendency for tall building structures when they collapse is to bend over and crash into surrounding areas. That’s why demolition experts are almost always hired to topple tall buildings in major cities.There is a growing number of people around the world who believe that the Twin Towers fell from a pair of controlled demolitions. Despite the best efforts of the Left Gatekeepers to suppress the movement, conferences are being held to discuss 9-11; books and papers are being published, videos are being produced, new websites appear daily and emails are circulating like wildfire.(An author I highly recommend is Eric Hufschmid. His book, “Painful Questions” argues convincingly that the Twin Towers fell from controlled demolitions. In addition, his excellent video, “Painful Deceptions” introduces more scientific anomalies with the official story of 9/11/01. At this writing there are no plans for Amy Goodman to have Hufschmid debut on her program.)The 911 Truth Movement is battling the Bush regime where it is most vulnerable. Instead of merely reporting on the growing infrastructure of the Bush regime’s planned police state, the activists investigating 9-11 are attempting to remove the justification for each piece of it.
They are attempting to isolate some basic ideas that can be delivered to large masses of people. Unfortunately, misguided Left Gatekeepers like Amy Goodman continue to block their efforts at pursuing the path that has the greatest chance of success.
SummaryDemocracy Now!’s contribution to the global struggle to remove the neoconservatives from power in the US is undermined each day that passes that Amy Goodman fails to invite on her show an articulate critic of the official story of 9/11/01. In addition, what little that has been said on DN! about 9-11 should be regarded as disinformation which is completely at the service of the Bush regime.What many of her critics want from Amy Goodman is for Democracy Now! to speak truth to power on the most important issue of our time. We all know from her past that when she speaks truth to power she can move mountains. Many of us also believe that we’re running out of time waiting for her to get moving.September 11th isn’t an issue like any other. It is the catalyst for the Bush regime’s dramatic expansion of US imperialism and very open foundations for a police state. Activists who are interested in removing the harm done by the Bush regime since 9/11/01 should focus on conveying the scientific anomalies with the official story of that day. To do otherwise is to fight a losing battle.Scott Loughrey
Amy Goodman & Global Warming Promotion
From Ken Adachi, Editor
December 8, 2011
December 8, 2011
Amy Goodman, while bringing much to the table, especially when reporting on the suffering wrought by the CIA and US military in unjustified wars of aggression against innocent people in the Middle East, is ultimately a propaganda tool of the Illuminati, at least for that arm of the Illuminati that influences and manipulates the Left into selling their "Green" story lines.
Amy's unceasing promotion of the Al Gore-initiated Global Warming myth is in full flower this week as she broadcasts her show, Democracy Now!, from the UN Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa. One or two days ago, I heard her on-the-scene interview of a handful of people from Greenpeace (long ago, sold-out and co-opted, useful idiots "environment police' similtar to the role players found at the Sierra Club) who attempted to hang one of their giant banners from atop a building in Durban and were stopped by local police, so naturally they were treated as 'storm the ramparts' heroes by Amy and given the opportunity to regurgitate the dire Global Warming laundry list of Terrible Things to Come if we soon fail to contain The Beast Called Global Warming.
Today's on-the-scene, Moment of Drama, came with the interruption of a speech about to be made by Todd Stern to the UN Summit participants. I'll let Amy describe the whole gripping story:
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/12/8/im_scared_for_my_future_student"Several prominent U.S. environmental groups have accused the Obama administration of obstructing negotiations at the United Nations Climate Change Conference and have called for the United States to step aside and let other countries carry on with the talks. Earlier today, the top U.S. climate negotiator Todd Stern addressed the U.N. summit for the first time. But as he took the stage, Middlebury College student Abigail Borah interrupted the proceedings. "I am scared for my future," Borah told Stern. "2020 is too late to wait. We need an urgent path to a fair, ambitious and legally binding treaty. You must take responsibility to act now." Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman later questioned Stern about Borah’s comments and accusations the United States is a major obstacle to progress at the climate talks. [includes rush transcript]"
Every day this week, Amy has dutifully hammered away at the idea that anybody who doesn't accept her and Al Gore's interpretation of the manufactured Global Warming party line is tantamount to a misanthrope now labeled a Global Warming denier, a term borrowed from the Zionists who are equally adament to quell any dissent concerning their 6 million Murdered Jews Holocaust scripture.
The ultimate goal of selling the Global Warming story line to the tender and gullible socialist souls of the Left is to install a new money making shell game (invented by the Illuminated pals of Al Gore, of course) called "carbon trading."
In order to create the pretext to justify the new money maker called 'carbon trading,' we first need to convince the world of the "problem" of Global Warming. And in order to do that, we need to generate a suffficient and emotion-laden "reaction" to the "problem", and that's where Amy Goodman, NPR, and other promoters of Global Warming come in.
The Problem-Reaction-Solution opinion-shaping strategy, routinely employed by the Globalists, was explained in the books of David Icke over a decade ago. It's nothing more than the Hegellian Dialectic at work. It's a technique for deceiving people into believing that they are achieving a 'solution" to a "problem" that was created for them by Illuminated elites--like Gore and Company--working quietly in the background
"Carbon trading' in just the first step in a larger Illuminati scheme to replace cash currency (and possibly even gold as a medium of exchange) with a new, all-inclusive control scheme called a "technocracy", which will employ units of "energy" credit (E.g Carbon 'taxes', etc.) in place of what we now call money.
It's a Brave New World we face, and Amy is doing her part to help bring it in-and the rest of us to our knees.
September 6, 2005----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 7:45 AM
Subject: Amy GoodmanKen,Regarding Amy Goodman and Democracy Now, it seems that she reports only facts. I understand the 650=2000, however, perhaps she feels that her audience may be 'lost' if DM! attempts to invoke debates such as this. I feel that she does need to speak on 911 as well as other vital information such as Chemtrails. The content on your website has always rang true to me.I only question the validity of DM! funding by the Rockefeller Foundation. If so, it is indeed scary. Do you feel she is controlled by this? Her passion tells otherwise.Attached, is a PDF file of her IRS form 990 for the year 2003. I thought it may be of interest to you.http://www.guidestar.com is the website in which you can acquire a free membership to view form 990's from most charities.Another note, Red Cross information- revenues, etc. may be of your interest, as well.I look forward to hearing your response on Amy Goodman and DM! Keep up the great work.Best Regards,Michael----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Amy GoodmanHi Michael,Thanks for the tax info about Democracy Now.I'm not emotionally attached to Amy Goodman. She puts out a lot of good material and interviews and I listen to portions of her program fairly often. I also hear her BS and the spin she puts on subjects like global warming or peak oil, etc. It doesn't throw me, and it shouldn't throw you.I can take the Good, the Bad and the Ugly with second or third tier spinners like Amy Goodman or Michael Ruppert and still benefit from their 'solid' information. I listen to NPR a lot because I know NPR is putting out the spin that the NWO wants "sophisticated" listeners to believe, so you know what's coming down the pike by the tenor of what NPR concentrates on. When I hear a blitz of stories about West Nile Virus or Bird Flu spreading across the land and lots of talk of preventative vaccinations, I then know that they are planning to release a new batch of infected mosquitoes and they are building their justification for spraying (what we are told is ) malathion, etc.The Rockefeller funding of Democracy Now was revealed inadvertently one night some months ago by Eban Ray over KPFK radio (90.7 FM, Los Angeles). She has a program on Wednesday night from 2-4 AM, as a subsection of Roy Tuckman's show, Something's Happening. I think it was during a fund drive effort. Eban was speaking and reading off the cuff from a paper that showed how much funding comes from listerners and how much comes from other sponsors. Eban was going through the various shows that run on KPFK and was surprised to see that one of the corporate funders of Democracy Now was the Rockefell Foundation. She seemed a little embarrased and flustered after realizing what she had just read, since she concentrates on NWO topics on her show. She sort of reacted with an "Hmmmmm, I wonder what that's all about?" type of giggle reaction and then dropped the subject. It all occured within a matter of seconds. I may or may not have it on tape. I record most of her material, but I don't usually record fund raiser shows. However, I remember clearly what she said that night.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2yC4xgeVMMBy Kevin Barrett
October 1, 2007Original Title:
Kevin Barrett Questions Amy Goodman On Building 7
Thanks to Matt Naus of http://ts911t.org for his stellar camerawork.
Please, write Amy and ask her to invite me on her show to continue the conversation
Amy Goodman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
I attended Amy Goodman's speech at the University of Wisconsin-Madison last night, Thursday, 9/27/2007. She talked about doing "ground zero reporting" and said "our job as journalists is to go to where the silence is." I wanted to confront Amy over her reprehensible silence about the 9/11 truth debates in general, and her refusal to cover the demolition of Building 7 in particular. After all, she was present at the pre-announced demolition of Building 7:
If I were confronting a hopelessly evil 9/11-complicit creep like Guiliani or McCain I'd be a lot more confrontational. But, as Col. Bob Bowman pointed out on my radio show, which will be rebroadcast next Friday, 10/5/07 4-6 pm CT on <http://gcnlive.com>http://gcnlive.com network 2, Amy is a potential ally, albeit a maddeningly silent one so far. And her audience, who are also potential allies, loves her. So I wanted to get in her face, but with a 'tough love' approach spiced with humor, rather than venting the anger we all feel about Amy's betrayal of the truth.
Amy began the question period by announcing that nobody would be tasered for asking questions.
Kevin:"Well, if anyone were going to be tasered here, it probably would be me. Hi Amy. Kevin Barrett here. I appreciate your great work on so many issues, and I agree with your quote that 'our job as journalists is to go to where the silence is.' Now there's a very popular youtube video that's especially popular among the 100 million Americans who know that 9/11 was an inside job, according to a New York Times poll. It shows you present at the controlled demolition of Building 7."Amy:"I did not demolish Building 7."Kevin:"Well, okay, I'm glad we got that straight. My question would be, if your job is to go to where the silence is, Building 7 is a great place of silence, as I'm sure you know. It's a 47 story building that came down into its own footprint for no apparent reason at about 5:30 p.m. on September 11th. A countdown to the demolition of Building 7 went out on New York police radio. I was in New York for the sixth anniversary, and every cop I talked to knows that that went out on police radio. The BBC reported that Building 7 had collapsed twenty minutes before it happened, with Building 7 standing in the background behind the reporter. And we have eyewitnesses--I can give you their contact information--who were inside Building 7 at [around] 9 o'clock in the morning who witnessed massive explosions that killed large numbers of people and devastated the lobby. There were pre-demolition explosions. You're right there in New York, you're right next to Ground Zero, and you talked about doing 'ground zero reporting' -- so when are you going to get around to doing some 'ground zero reporting' on Building 7?"Heckler: "Why don't you shut up, this is not your night."
Amy:"Overall, I would say that everything that happened on September 11th should be fully investigated. Of course I don't think that the 9/11 Commission was an adequate investigation. And I agree that there are a lot of questions that have to be answered."[well jeez Amy, you're a journalist, you're based right next to Ground Zero...why don't YOU try to get some answers??!!!]
While I stood in line to get my Amy Goodman book autographed, I autographed Amy a copy of my own book Truth Jihad: My Epic Struggle Against the 9/11 Big Lie:http://www.amazon.com/Truth-Jihad-Epic-Struggle-Against/dp/0930852990
I also carried a copy of the best photo book on 9/11, Eric Huffschmid's Painful Questions, open to the page showing the demolition of Building 7. When I arrived in Amy's exalted presence, the following dialogue transpired:
Amy: "I guess you're famous here."
Kevin: "Not as famous as you, Amy. Here's my book, with my phone number, in case you want to invite me on your show, or appear on one of my three radio shows. Also, I was wondering if you could autograph this book (Eric Huffschmidt's Painful Questions) here on the Building 7 page (page 65, featuring still shots from the demolition of WTC-7) so when you break this story..."
Amy: "I don't want to mess up your page."
Kevin: " I think when you break this story it'll be valuable..."
Matt Naus (off camera): "You were there, Amy! I saw the video of you. You were there!"
Amy: (smiling) "I work right there."
Kevin: "I mean, if you break this story...if anybody does, it might be you...and if you sign this, this will be a very valuable book."
Still smiling, she declines to sign.
Please write to Amy and ask her to invite Kevin Barrett on her show either (A) for a friendly chat about the 9/11 truth movement, or (B) to debate any bunker who dares to try to take me on. Her address: email@example.com
Oklahoma "Truth" Convergence Infested with 9/11 Gatekeepers
========================by Lisa Guliani
January 11, 2006http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/okbic2006.html
On January 21, 2006, key members of the 9-11 Mafia and OKC Bombing gatekeeper group will appear together at the University of Oklahoma's Memorial Union Building to present an eight-hour long dog & pony show for the public, which is being promoted as the "Oklahoma Truth Convergence." The event has been micromanaged from its inception by notorious 9-11 Gatekeeper Queen Janice Matthews (executive director of 911truth.org), along with her containment crew. So, if you plan to attend this event, brace yourself for more of the same regurgitated shinola pointing the finger of blame at "international terrorists" rather than the true perpetrators of the OKC bombing event. (see: The OKC-Elohim City Connection http://www.wingtv.net/elohim.html )
Also, expect to hear the familiar strains of "LIHOP" bouncing off the walls of the ballroom because gatekeepers are masterful at covering-up acts of state-sponsored terrorism by planting the idea that it was all due to 'government incompetence and negligence.' The fact that Cruella D'eville herself (Janice Matthews) gets top billing as one of the featured speakers at this event speaks volumes. Other confirmed speakers will be OKC gatekeeper and former Oklahoma state representative Charles Key, who managed to screw up the previous event in OKC (April 2005) by embracing CIA spin-meister Bob Barr and his pro-government line of BS; as well as Key's ever-faithful lapdog, Chris Emery.
As many of you may recall, the OKC event of April 2005 was the brainchild of WING TV, and we were honored to be a part of that historical time of truth telling. Unfortunately, the inclusion of Bob Barr and the strange behavior of Charles Key left us (as well as many others in attendance) with strong suspicions before it even ended; and subsequently, we witnessed the even more distressing infiltration and manipulation of the OKC bombing investigative committee by individuals in the 9-11 containment crowd. Despite the fact that there will be elements of truth presented at this Norman, OK conference, mainly by OKC bombing survivors V.Z. Lawton and Jane Graham, and a speech by former federal grand juror Hoppy Heidelberg, the writing is (sadly enough) already on the wall.
The reality of the situation is, when truth is mixed with disinformation, all you end up with is disinformation. That is standard fare at any gatekeeper event, and those of us who have already witnessed their government-infiltrated cover-up performances in the past are already cringing. It's unfortunate that Hoppy Heidelberg isn't the man in charge of this event, because we know where his heart is. Another speaker making a repeat appearance is former Texas attorney Harmon Taylor, who should, in all honesty, perform a citizen's arrest on Charles Key for being such an unabated stooge of the federal government.
The announcement for this upcoming forum states that there will also be a few "surprise" speakers as well. The release claims that due to the "sensitive nature of their presentations" these unknown speakers' identities will not be publicly revealed, so we're left to wonder why they're hiding. We know from firsthand experience with this crowd that if left to their own devices, nothing "sensitive" is likely to be revealed. Maybe they don't want to deal with the inevitable bad press that will undoubtedly occur if head once again. What the public and the OKC survivors don't need is more of the same old tired government apologist schtick with an "Arab terrorist twist" that he regurgitated back in April 2005.
Another glaring red flag is the mention of Pacifica Radio's Bonnie Faulkner in Chris Emery's press release. For those of you unaware of what Pacifica Radio represents, please check out the following link where you'll see a long history of contributions to this organization by the Ford Foundation and other well-known New World Order think tanks.
(see Pacifica Radio Gatekeepers Sponsored by Ford (CIA) Foundation http://educate-yourself.org/cn/fordfoundationciaandgatekeepers11oct05.shtml)
In addition, Pacific Radio is also the network which carries Amy Goodman's Disinformation Now radio show, which has gone out of its way to conceal the truth about what actually happened on the morning of September 11, 2001. Another one of the event promoters - Cerebellum TV - has an interview link on their homepage to - guess who - yup, Amy Goodman. How convenient!
Lastly, take a look at the following flowchart and you'll see Pacifica Radio right in the middle of other well-known NWO luminaries like George Soros, the Carnegie Foundation, the Carlyle Group, and the Rockefeller Foundation (as well as many others).
Left Gatekeepers (http://www.leftgatekeepers.com/chart.htm)
Now before we proceed, let me ask you a very simple question: do you feel that any of the above-mentioned individuals or groups want the truth to be known about the OKC bombing? The answer, of course, is no. So, it's logical to wonder: what are Charles Key and Chris Emery doing with them other than covering-up the truth?
Be wary. It has been our experience here at WING TV that unless absolutely pushed to do so, the OKC Gatekeepers will not hammer home the truth about unexploded bombs in the Murrah building. In the past, without constant pressure from us, the supposed OKC "truth" faction has been more inclined to suppress, downplay, and de-emphasize the controlled demolition of the Alfred P. Murrah building and the crucial Elohim City government connections involved in this state-sponsored terrorist attack. Instead, they seem to continually peddle a bizarre brand of neocon-inspired "international terrorist" fiction rather than the truth.
We have warned the OKBIC, and particularly members Charles Key and Christopher Emery, about hooking up with Janice Matthews and her legion of liars who have caused such damage to the 9-11 truth movement over the last four years. Regrettably, our warnings have gone unheeded, as is evidenced by the total infiltration and intertwining of the OKBIC by 911truth.org - a group that has done everything in its power these last few years to suppress the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001 from the American people. There is one thing I am reasonably confident will happen at this Oklahoma "Truth" Convergence. Expect to see 911truth.org doing what they do best: tabling donations and sucking the money out of the public's pockets as they exploit yet another venue to sell their LIHOP bullshit to the world.
If you seek a day of truth, then follow the path of truth, not the road to hell.
Comments12 Jan. 12, 2006 from Craig Roberts <firstname.lastname@example.org>I don't know where the WING TV duo gets the burr in their saddle, but I do know that Charles Key and Chris Emery and others have devoted a lot of time and money out of their own pockets to get to the bottom of the OKC bombing case. I also have a problem with Lisa and Victor failing to recognize the Nichols/Philippine/Abu Sayef/al Qaeda connections that have been confirmed and documented--and we have the documents from government sources to prove them.
They support JD Cash's disinfo regarding Elohim City and all of the old diversion stuff, and totally ignore eye witness accounts at the scene that saw the "middle easterners" and all of the evidence that we dug up "back in the day" showing the Iraqi POW/resettlement characters who were involved and present.
The key is that instead of extolling the OKBICs policy of having difference of opinion and giving others a chance to air their theories/evidence, they stamp this as "disinformation' if it doen't support THEIR pet theory--which actually goes no place but in circles of government informants watching government informants.
Of course the government had foreknowledge. But to leave out many facts and players is not a way to investigate a case. Conan Doyle (writing as Sherlock Holmes) in "A Scandal in Bohemia" said "It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit
theories, instead of theories to suit facts."
I spent ten years investigating this case and to try and trumpet only the Elohim City/Strassmeir connection is to blame only one water-filled compartment on the Titanic for the sinking. And to begin name calling and ranting about "disinformation" is very unprofessional.
I have seen this same thing happen to the JFK research community. It has broken down into cells with each having their own "theorie" about whodunnit--and the other groups who believe a different villain is involved is obviously working for the CIA, FBI, or the Devil himself. Let's not let this effort on the OKC case get fragmented in the same manner. We ALL need to take all the pieces of the puzzle and put them on the wall to see what picture is formed.
From: "Daniel Marvin" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: OKBIC INFESTED BY 9/11 GATEKEEPERSCraig,
I am at a loss as to who or what got into Lisa and Victor's inner court to influence and no doubt corrupt them in what they now portray. I was one a couple of their early programs and I have tried to get back on when I too noticed a trend toward theories that did no more than take the attention away from those who have seriously attacked the cause of the OKC bombing. I know that my first reaction regarding the OKC bombing was that it was indeed an "inside job" ...using people trained as myself and employing "dust initiator" and "earmuff" charges to take that building down to the extent that it was.
Please keep up the good work and know I pray for you.