Punished in Paradise
An Exegetical Theory on 2 Corinthians 12:1-10
An Exegetical Theory on 2 Corinthians 12:1-10
Robert M. Price
-----
Β Κορ. 12,1 Καυχᾶσθαι δὴ οὐ
συμφέρει μοι· ἐλεύσομαι γὰρ εἰς ὀπτασίας καὶ
ἀποκαλύψεις Κυρίου.
Β Κορ. 12,1 Να καυχηθώ δια τόσα και τόσα άλλα, που υπέστην και
έπραξα δια το Ευαγγέλιον, δεν με συμφέρει από πνευματικής απόψεως. Θα προχωρήσω
όμως εις οράματα και αποκαλύψεις, που έλαβα εκ μέρους του Κυρίου.
Β Κορ. 12,2 οἶδα ἄνθρωπον ἐν
Χριστῷ πρὸ ἐτῶν δεκατεσσάρων· εἴτε ἐν
σώματι οὐκ οἶδα, εἴτε ἐκτὸς τοῦ σώματος οὐκ
οἶδα, ὁ Θεὸς οἶδεν· ἁρπαγέντα τὸν τοιοῦτον
ἕως τρίτου οὐρανοῦ.
Β Κορ. 12,2 Γνωρίζω ένα άνθρωπον, που εζούσε εν Χριστώ, και ο
οποίος προ δεκατεσσάρων ετών-είτε ευρίσκετο στο σώμα του κατά την ώραν εκείνην
δεν γνωρίζω· είτε ήτο εκτός του σώματος, δεν γνωρίζω, ο Θεός το γνωρίζει-είχεν
αρπαγή και αναληφθ έως τον τρίτον ουρανόν.
Β Κορ. 12,3 καὶ οἶδα τὸν
τοιοῦτον ἄνθρωπον· εἴτε ἐν σώματι εἴτε ἐκτὸς
τοῦ σώματος οὐκ οἶδα, ὁ Θεὸς οἶδεν·
Β Κορ. 12,3 Και γνωρίζω, ότι αυτός ο άνθρωπος-είτε με το σώμα του
έξω από το σώμα του, δεν γνωρίζω, ο Θεός γνωρίζει-
Β Κορ. 12,4 ὅτι ἡρπάγη εἰς
τὸν παράδεισον καὶ ἤκουσεν ἄῤῥητα ῥήματα,
ἃ οὐκ ἐξὸν ἀνθρώπῳ λαλῆσαι.
Β Κορ. 12,4 ότι ηρπάγη έως στον παράδεισον και ήκουσε λόγους, τους
οποίους ανθρωπίνη γλώσσα δεν ημπορεί να διατυπώση και τους οποίους δεν είναι
επιτετραμμένον στον άνθρωπον να τους είπη και τους αποκαλύψη.
Β Κορ. 12,5 ὑπὲρ τοῦ
τοιούτου καυχήσομαι, ὑπὲρ δὲ ἐμαυτοῦ οὐ
καυχήσομαι εἰ μὴ ἐν ταῖς ἀσθενείαις μου.
Β Κορ. 12,5 Δια τον άνθρωπον αυτόν θα καυχηθώ, που τον ετίμησε
τόσον πολύ ο Θεός. Δια τον ευατόν μου όμως δεν θα καυχηθώ, παρά μόνον δια τας
ασθενείας μου, όπως αυταί αφάνησαν εις τας περιόδους των διωγμών και των
κινδύνων.
Β Κορ. 12,6 ἐὰν γὰρ
θελήσω καυχήσασθαι, οὐκ ἔσομαι ἄφρων· ἀλήθειαν γὰρ
ἐρῶ· φείδομαι δὲ μή τις εἰς ἐμὲ
λογίσηται ὑπὲρ ὃ βλέπει με ἢ ἀκούει τι ἐξ ἐμοῦ.
Β Κορ. 12,6 Εάν όμως θελήσω να καυχηθώ δια τους αγώνας μου και δια
τα έργα, τα οποία με την βοήθειαν του Θεού υπέρ του Ευαγγελίου έκαμα, δεν θα
είμαι άφρων, διότι θα πω την αλήθειαν. Διστάζω όμως και αποφεύγω να το πράξω,
μήπως τυχόν κανείς σχηματίση δι' εμέ ιδέαν ανωτέραν, από ο,τι βλέπεις εις εμέ η
απ' ο,τι ακούει από εμέ.
Β Κορ. 12,7 Καὶ τῇ ὑπερβολῇ
τῶν ἀποκαλύψεων ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι, ἐδόθη
μοι σκόλοψ τῇ σαρκί, ἄγγελος σατᾶν, ἵνα με κολαφίζῃ
ἵνα μὴ ὑπεραίρωμαι.
Β Κορ. 12,7 Και ένεκα του πολλού πλήθους των αποκαλύψεων, δια να
μη υπερηφανεύωμαι, επέτρεψεν ο Θεός και μου εδόθη σκληρό αγκάθι στο σώμα,
άγγελος δηλαδή του σατανά, δια να με γρονθοκοπή και να με ταλαιπωρή, ανίατος
ασθένεια δια να μη το παρώ επάνω μου.
Β Κορ. 12,8 ὑπὲρ τούτου τρὶς
τὸν Κύριον παρεκάλεσα ἵνα ἀποστῇ ἀπ᾿ ἐμοῦ·
Β Κορ. 12,8 Δια την θλίψιν και δοκιμασίαν αυτήν τρεις φορές
παρεκάλεσα τον Κυριον να μου την απομακρύνη.
Β Κορ. 12,9 καὶ εἴρηκέ
μοι· ἀρκεῖ σοι ἡ χάρις μου· ἡ γὰρ
δύναμίς μου ἐν ἀσθενείᾳ τελειοῦται. ἥδιστα οὖν
μᾶλλον καυχήσομαι ἐν ταῖς ἀσθενείαις μου, ἵνα ἐπισκηνώσῃ
ἐπ᾿ ἐμὲ ἡ δύναμις τοῦ Χριστοῦ.
Β Κορ. 12,9 Και ο Κυριος μου είπε· “σου αρκεί η χάρις μου· διότι η
δύναμίς μου φαίνεται ολοένα και τελειοτέρα μέσα εις την ανθρωπίνην αδυναμίαν με
τα μεγάλα και θαυμαστά έργα που κατορθώνει”. Με πολύ μεγάλην εσωτερικήν
γλυκύτητα και ευχαρίστησιν θα καυχώμαι περισσότερον δια τας ασθενείας μου, ώστε
να μένω έτσι εις την ταπεινοφροσύνην, δια να κατοικήση εις εμέ η δύναμις του
Χριστού.
Β Κορ. 12,10 διὸ εὐδοκῶ
ἐν ἀσθενείαις, ἐν ὕβρεσιν, ἐν ἀνάγκαις, ἐν
διωγμοῖς, ἐν στενοχωρίαις, ὑπὲρ Χριστοῦ· ὅταν
γὰρ ἀσθενῶ, τότε δυνατός εἰμι.
Β Κορ. 12,10 Δια τούτο δοκιμάζω εσωτερικήν χαράν και ευφροσύνην εις
τας ασθενείας, εις τας ύβρεις, εις τας ανάγκας, στους διωγμούς, εις τας
στενοχωρίας, τας οποίας υφίσταμαι και υπομένω δια τον Χριστόν. Διότι όταν
ευρίσκωμαι υπό το κράτος αυτών των ασθενειών, τότε με την χάριν του Θεού
γίνομαι και είμαι δυνατός. -----------------
To
most students of the Pauline epistles, 2 Corinthians 12:1-10 must surely stand
out as exceptional among Pauline texts. Elsewhere the interpreter may well feel
at home amid Paul's pastoral and theological musings. But here, suddenly, the
apostle ascends into the heavens and takes the unsuspecting reader with him.
And just as Paul the visionary is charged to divulge his revelations to no man,
so the baffled exegete may find it impossible to say anything intelligible
about this bizarre text. The present piece will attempt to make 2 Corinthians a
bit more intelligible, yet perhaps at the price of making it seem rather more
bizarre as well!
As for the setting of the passage, Paul finds
himself embattled with cynical "super-apostles" (11:5) who malign his
weakness and unimpressiveness. By contrast, they
think, they can appeal to "visions and revelations" which serve to
accredit them just like the prophets of old. What can Paul possibly produce to
compare with such wonders? After all, they must have assured the gullible
Corinthians, he's never mentioned such experiences, has he? Well then! Paul
responds in our text by breaking his fourteen-year silence, and adducing a
quite spectacular visionary experience from the past. Quickly explaining his
reticence to describe it heretofore, Paul spurns an appeal to such things for
accreditation purposes. Confidence should instead be based on observable and
proven character which he is sure he has amply demonstrated. But to silence the
scoffers, and to beat them at their own worthless game, Paul allows himself to
"boast." He seems to be having a bit of fun at his own expense, as
well as that of his rivals. Basically, the thrust of the "pronouncement
story" constituted by 2 Corinthians l2:l-10 is
that the blessing of God comes only on the heels of adversity, not in the midst
of visionary ecstasy. How does he know this? Because his own journey to heaven
resulted in the former, not the latter! Though this gist has been obvious
enough to all exegetes, it is safe to say that the individual details of the
story have seemed obscure. Not only so, but the exact connection is less than
clear between the "revelations" and the mysterious "thorn"
received by Paul on account of them. The present notes will seek to clarify
these points in a new and perhaps surprising way.
First, it should be recalled that the motif of a
visionary journey to heaven or paradise must have been well-known to the
apostle. Much of the contemporary apocalyptic literature
known to us deals with the ascension into heaven of various ancient
patriarchs and prophets including Enoch, Ezra, Baruch, Moses, and Levi. They
return to divulge what they have seen and heard. They have learned "secrets"
pertaining to the end of the age, the hierarchy of angels, astronomy, and
calendar lore. In our passage, as elsewhere in his correspondence, Paul
evidences familiarity with this world of ideas. For instance, he knows that it
was "the third" of multiple heavens that he visited. And as the
ancient visionaries were said to have traveled sometimes physically (Enoch,
Elijah, Baruch), and sometimes astrally (Ezekiel,
Moses), Paul also knows both as theoretical possibilities (verses 2-3).
Another branch of Jewish arcana with which Paul
may have been familiar, as J. Bowker shows,1 is that of Merkabah ("throne") mysticism. This was a
mystical technique practiced in Paul's day and for centuries afterward. It can
be traced as far back as the first century A.D. among the pupils of rabbi Johanan ben Zakkai.
Hints of it are also to be found in earlier works including the Testament of
Levi, 1 Enoch, and the
Qumran scrolls. In the opinion
of Gershom Scholem, the
apostle Paul forms a connecting historical link between such literature and the
later, developed, Merkabah mysticism. Basically, such
a mystic contemplated Ezekiel's vision of God's throne (Ezekiel 1:4-2:14) in
hopes of experiencing a vision of the heavenly throne-chariot himself. Though Bowker does not bother to adduce
significant parallels between Merkabah texts and
Paul's experience in 2 Corinthians 12:1-10, these are not lacking, as will be
shown presently.
Having briefly recalled the context of our
passage as well as the thought world in which it is to be set, the discussion
will proceed to the identity of Paul's "thorn in the flesh." Paul is
said thus to be afflicted to avoid his becoming insufferably proud over the
privilege of listening in on heavenly mysteries (kai te huperbole ton apokalupseon).
Verse 7's mention of "revelations" is usually taken to refer back to
the series of visionary experiences first mentioned in verse 1, of which the
one here described is but a single example. This need not be so. Instead, I
suggest that the "revelations" of verse 7 have a more immediate antecedent,
i.e., the "unutterable utterances" (arreta hremata) of verse 4. Thus the thorn will
have been inflicted in direct connection with the heavenly secrets disclosed
to Paul on the particular occasion described in our passage. The importance of
this suggestion for our exegesis will soon be clear.
But what of the
"thorn" itself? Needless to say, it has been a thorn in the
side to exegetes as well. Most explanations make of the thorn a physical or
nervous illness of some sort. Among other candidates are such maladies as
malaria, epilepsy, eye-trouble, neuralgia, colic, rheumatism, and leprosy! It
would be no wonder that the apostle would have traveled with a "beloved
physician"! A few have understood "flesh" in a less literal
sense and so take Paul to mean some besetting sin or temptation. Menoud has claimed that Paul is referring to his anguish
over
Israel's hardness of heart
toward Christ. Mullins gives good reasons to take the thorn as meaning an
irritating enemy. He points out that similar descriptions of enemies occur in
the Septuagint version of Numbers 33:55; Joshua 23:13; 1 Kings 14:9; 2
Chronicles 24:8; Song of Solomon 2:2; Ezekiel 2:6; 28:24; Micah 7:4. He also
suggests that the use of kolaphidzo
("to beat with the fist") implies a personal antagonist. Paul's
Corinthian opponents are already designated in 2 Corinthians 11:14-15 as
Satan's diakonoi,
a term very similar to aggelos Satana in
12:7.2
Paul did indeed agonize over Jewish unbelief,
but this hardly seems to be in view here. And though he did have to fight
sensual temptation (1 Corinthians
9:27), it is rather hard to
see how he would have made the connection between any particular sin and his
visionary experience. That the thorn was a sin is especially unlikely since the
purpose of the thorn was to prevent him from indulg;ng in sin, i.e., of pride. Contextually, probably
the best of these options is Mullins' theory of personal opponents, but the
same weakness besets all these suggestions. How would Paul have concluded that
any of these things was sent his way in connection with his journey to
Paradise? At this point the
kinship of Paul's vision with Jewish "throne mysticism" makes things
much clearer.
In the more elaborate descriptions of Merkabah visions, we find the visionary being attacked by
angels and/or demons on his way to the divine throne room. Scholem
describes the typical vision: "As the journey progresses, the dangers
become progressively greater. Angels and archons storm against the traveler
'in order to drive him out ...."'3 According to the
Munich manuscript of the Hekhaloth texts: “... if anyone was unworthy to see the
King in his beauty, the angels at the gates disturbed his senses and confused
him .... But he was standing in front of the angels when... they began to stone
him and... they strike his head... and wound him.4
In a lesser Hekhaloth
text, Rabbi Akiba describes his journey to paradise:
"In that hour when I ascended on high,... when I
came to the curtain, angels of destruction went forth to destroy me."5
Our suggestion is that, in light of such texts,
it makes sense to understand the thorn in the flesh "an angel of Satan,
sent to buffet me," as quite literally a demon or malevolent angel, sent
to punish Paul's pride at the wonder of his experience. "Thorn"(skolops) in
classical usage can mean "stake" and can be equivalent to
"cross" (stauros).
Paul's pride was deflated, and the phrase is parallel and equivalent to
Galatians 5:24: "Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh
with its passions and desires." Thus, like the visionaries in the Hekhaloth passages, he must "take his licks"
insofar as he is "unworthy" to see the enthroned Lord.
Reconstructing the heavenly scenario, we may
imagine this to have been the sequence of events: Paul finds himself caught up
into heaven. There he is treated to ineffable revelations. Waxing proud over
his enviable position, Paul suddenly finds himself the object of attack by a
punishing demon or angel. Paul appeals thrice to the exalted Lord on the
heavenly throne before him, who finally declares that Paul must learn his
lesson; i.e., "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made
perfect in weakness." It is a lesson that Paul learned well, carrying it
with him through subsequent, earthly trials (2 Corinthians 12:10). This picture may seem
to some readers a bit too outlandish to be plausible, but let the reader keep
in mind that he is already dealing with the story of a man who claims to have
visited heaven one day! Given a camel of this size, why strain at the mere gnat
proposed here?
A couple of details in the passage may not seem
to comport with the present reconstruction. Paul prayed three times that the
"angel" might leave him. To most readers, it sounds as if Paul had
prayed for some kind of healing. After a while, with no recovery in sight, Paul
would pray again, until after the third time he resigned himself. Yet the three
requests do not need to denote an extended period. In Mark 14:35-39 we see
Jesus praying one prayer three times on one occasion.
The reader may be asking how, if (according to
this reading of the text) Paul was literally pummeled by an attacker, he could
have not known whether his ascent to paradise was "in the body" (2
Corinthians 12:2-3)? Here again, another New Testament text provides
clarification. In Acts 12, Peter is awakened in prison by an angel striking him
on the side (a circumstance very similar to that envisioned here), yet he is
unsure whether it is all really happening, or merely a vision (Acts 12:9). In
the same way, Paul may have experienced apparently corporeal pain, yet not have
known whether his presence were physical or merely astral.
In conclusion, it will be interesting to note
that Paul's experience (as reconstructed here) finds further parallels in other
early Christian literature. Visionaries find themselves under demonic/angelic
attack, from which they are to learn a lesson. For instance, Hermas' fourth vision finds him being charged by a huge
monster which "is a type of the persecution to come." He is to learn
this lesson and pass it on to his brethren: “Put your faith in the Lord, you
men of divided purpose, because He can do all things and turns aside His wrath
from you, while He sends scourges on you who doubt in your heart.” [my emphasis] (Vis. 4, II, 6).
As in Paul's vision, the hero is to learn to
trust the Lord's power in adversity. Similarly, in the twelfth mandate, he is
told: "The Devil can wrestle with, but not overcome them [my emphasis]."
(Man. 12, V, 2). In the
seventh parable, he asks the angel of repentance to call off the avenging angel
who is severely afflicting him. But "If he endures the afflictions that
come to him, mercy to the full will be granted by the Creator of all things,
who also has given strength and who will grant a remedy" (Sim. 7, I, 4). Here an angel is behind troubles suffered
in waking life, yet this lesson is symbolized by a vision where Hermas sees the avenging angel beating Christians and
throwing them into patches of thorns! (Sim.
6, II, 5 6).
In the second-century Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas,
the heroine has two visions, wherein she steps on the head of a dragon, and
defeats Satan in gladiatorial combat. From these demonic conflicts, she learns
that she will be given grace in adversity; she will be victorious in facing her
death for Christ. (Martyrdom,
4 and 10).
Eusebius tells the story of Natalius
who had been seduced by heresy. He finally repented of his error when he was
"lashed by holy angels, through the whole night, and was thus most
severely punished." He had learned his lesson and, in sackcloth and ashes,
begged to be readmitted to the orthodox communion. (Ecclesiastical History, Book V, Chapter XXVIII). The demonic
harassment theme occurs again in early medieval vision literature, e. g., the
visions of Furseus in 621 A.D. and Drihthelm ca. 725 A.D.
The present reconstruction of Paul's journey to
paradise has the advantage of providing a logical connection between the
superlative visions on the one hand, and the punitive experience of the
"thorn" on the other, a feature conspicuous by its absence from most
of the exegetical theories. It also makes sense of this visionary pronouncement
story as a whole by placing it against the background of ancient Jewish and
Christian vision literature. As warned earlier, the passage seen this way may
seem even further removed from the experience of modern readers than it did
before. Yet the "punch line" is always the important thing in a
pronouncement story. And there is no reason that Paul's lesson should be alien
to the experience of any modern reader: "My grace is sufficient for you;
for my power is made perfect in weakness."
1.
J. Bowker, "'Merkabah'
Visions and the Visions of Paul," Journal
of Semitic Studies, 16, 1971, pp. 158-159.
2.
T. Y. Mullins, "Paul's Thorn in the Flesh," Journal of Biblical Literature, 76, 1957, pp. 301-303.
3.
Gershom G. Scholem, Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (New
York: Schocken Books, 1973), p. 51
4.
Ibid., pp. 52-53.
5.
Gershom G. Scholem, Jewish Gnosticism, Merkabah
Mysticism and Talmudic Tradition (New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of
America, 1965), p. 77.===============
http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/art_paradi.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment