Evidence for the Afterlife
Eminent Researchers for more information and links). These scientists were not fooled by magic tricks. Highly skilled stage magicians have investigated many mediums and have found them to be genuine (see the chapter on Skeptical Fallacies for more information and links). Studies have shown people with more education are more likely to believe in the afterlife, and most medical doctors believe in the afterlife (see the chapter on Skeptical Fallacies for more information and links). These highly educated and intelligent people are right, there is no death. Departed loved ones are not gone, they continue to live in a higher realm.
Not many people are aware of how much solid evidence there is for the afterlife. If you read through this chapter, you will be one of the few people who can fully appreciate how many different types of evidence there are. This evidence comes from mediumship (Mrs. Piper, proxy sittings, drop in communicators, and cross correspondences), shared near death experiences and veridical NDEs, shared death bed visions, multiple witness apparitions, children with past life memories, quantum mechanics and more. There are also links to web based sources of information including free e-book versions of important studies on the afterlife. If you look into those linked sources of information, you will be able to see the rigor and substantiveness of the evidence for the afterlife. Do you want to learn more about this life affirming subject? If so, read on ...
Some of the best evidence for the afterlife is:
This chapter summarizes some of the scientific evidence for the afterlife and, wherever possible, includes links to on-line references and additional sources of information. In many cases, the links include references to the actual reports and writings those who conducted the investigations which you can look up to more fully understand this evidence. The purpose of this chapter is to acquaint readers with the wide variety and compelling nature of this evidence which is not well known to the general public. The evidence goes beyond proving paranormal phenomena are real, it proves the existence of spirits and therefore the afterlife. The definition of scientific proof that skeptics use to assert that evolution by natural selection is proved is discussed and that same definition holds for the existence of spirits and the afterlife.
A quick glance through this chapter will show that there are many different independent forms of evidence and that the evidence is not limited to mediumship. There is objective evidence obtained through electronic instruments as well as evidence obtained through collecting reports directly from people who have witnessed afterlife phenomena and who otherwise have no involvement with the field of afterlife research or mediumship. Some people feel that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The evidence for the afterlife is so extensive and varied that it is, in fact, extraordinary evidence.
The chapter Skeptical Fallacies examines objections to this evidence and shows those objections are not valid. The possibility that these phenomena are the result of psychic powers of living people are disproved in the sections on Super-Psi and Where Do Mediums Get Information From? in the chapter on Short Topics.
If you follow the links and look further into the evidence you will see that besides a variety of types of evidence, there is also a large cumulative amount of evidence. Theoretically, one solid case is sufficient to prove the assertion that a thing exists. However, for the afterlife, there are many, many solid cases from many types of evidence.
The following passages are taken from "29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Scientific "Proof", scientific evidence, and the scientific method" by Douglas Theobald, Ph.D. This is part of the FAQ for one of the foremost communities of skeptics on the internet. Interestingly, much of what is written about the theory of scientific proof that is used to justify the theory of evolution by natural selection also applies to belief in the afterlife.
The primary function of science is to demonstrate the existence of phenomena that cannot be observed directly.Science is when you make hypotheses and and test them against empirical evidence. Our hypothesis is that spirits and the afterlife exist and when considered against the evidence the conclusion that they do exist is inescapable.
After reading the cases below, you can find out much more about the scientific evidence for spirits and the afterlife by reading these detailed overviews.
Source: The Survival Files by Miles Edward Allen
Source: Psychic Adventures In New York by Neville Whymant
Source: "R-101" by Michael Prescott
Source: "An Amazing Experiment" by Charles Drayton Thomas
Source: CBC News Thursday, January 27, 2005
Reincarnation researcher Ian Stevenson investigated children who had verifiable memories of past lives. Stevenson interviewed everyone involved, the children, the current families, and surviving members of the families from the previous life. He found that these children remembered geography, faces, and names of people in locations they had never been to. Some children could converse in a foreign language they spoke in a past life. Some had birthmarks on their body where they had sustained injuries in the previous life.
http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_07_4_stevenson.pdf More links to on-line research articles by Ian Stevenson can be found in the chapter on Recommended Reading.
Also see the following URL for a list of publications by Ian Stevenson
The evidence for reincarnation cannot be explained by inadvertent mediumship or other forms of psychic perception.
Individuals near death can often see the spirit world and they also see spirits who come to help them make the transition. Many examples of this are described in Death Bed Visions by William Barrett:
Visions have included spirits of individuals who had died but who the patient thought were still living. This proves the visions are accurate and not imagined. (Chapter 2)
Those attending the dying sometimes see the same spirits the dying see. This also rules out hallucinations since multiple witnesses would not have identical hallucinations.
"A short time before she expired I became aware that two spirit forms were standing by the bedside, one on either side of it. I did not see them enter the room; they were standing by the bedside when they first became visible to me, but I could see them as distinctly as I could any of the human occupants of the room.... Just before they appeared the dying girl exclaimed, 'It has grown suddenly dark; I cannot see anything!' But she recognized them immediately. A smile, beautiful to see, lit up her face. She stretched forth her hands and in joyous tones exclaimed, 'Oh, you have come to take me away! I am glad, for I am very tired.'More examples of shared death bed visions can be found in
A FURTHER RECORD OF OBSERVATIONS OF CERTAIN PHENOMENA OF TRANCE by Richard Hodgson L.L.D. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research Vol. XIII. 1898, p 284 - 582
See the foot note on page 378:
The first writing of the sitting came from Madame Elisa, without my expecting it. She wrote clearly and strongly, explaining that F. was there with her, but unable to speak directly, that she wished to give me an account of how she had helped F. to reach her. She said that she had been present at his death-bed, and had spoken to him, and she repeated what she had said, an unusual form of expression, and indicated that he had heard and recognised her. This was confirmed in detail in the only way possible at that time, by a very intimate friend of Madame Elisa and myself, and also of the nearest surviving relative of F. I showed my friend the account of the sitting, and to this friend, a day or two later, the relative, who was present at the death-bed, stated spontaneously that F. when dying said that he saw Madame Elisa who was speaking to him, and he repeated what she was saying. The expression so repeated, which the relative quoted to my friend, was that which I had received from Madame Elisa through Mrs. Piper’s trance, when the death-bed incident was of course entirely unknown to me.Top
There are people who, due to accident or illness, have been effectively dead for a time with their brain in a state incapable of supporting consciousness. When they were revived by doctors, they reported being in the spirit world and seeing deceased loved ones. If a person who is effectively dead can have a conscious experience, that is very strong evidence for the afterlife. However, some people who have had an NDE have also reported verifiable information from remote locations they could not have perceived with their normal senses even if they had not lost consciousness. Other people who have had an NDE have reported verifiable information about events around them that occurred during a time when they had no brain activity. These veridical NDEs pinpoint the time of the NDE and they demonstrate that consciousness does not require a functioning brain. Veridical NDEs also demonstrate the accuracy of NDE perceptions.
Some NDEs have been shared by healthy people attending those who are near death. Other NDEs have been shared by several people who were involved in the same life threatening accident. These shared NDEs show that NDEs are not hallucinations but real experiences and the information in reports by people who have had NDEs is reliable.
Here is an example of a veridical NDE:
While Maria's body was being worked on by the medical staff she experienced leaving her body. She floated upwards some 4 stories and came out onto the roof of the hospital. There on the ledge of the roof she saw an old sneaker with a worn little toe and one lace tucked under the heel. When the resuscitation procedure had proved successful Maria came to and was quite preoccupied with her vision of the sneaker. ... She managed to persuade the social worker Kim Clark to go check and directed her to a window from which the shoe could be seen when leaning out. ... Clark easily found the correct window and there, indeed, lay the sneaker on the ledge with the worn little toe and the lace tucked under the heel just as Maria had described it.Here is an excerpt from a shared NDE described on near-death.com:
We saw that the sparkling lights were tiny, transparent bubbles that drifted in the air and sparkled on the grass. We realized that each tiny sparkle was a soul. To me, the valley appeared to be Heaven, but at the same time I knew that James and Rashad were seeing it differently. James saw it as the Gulf of Souls. Rashad saw it as Nirvana, and somehow we knew all this without speaking. The light began gathering at the far end of the valley, and slowly, out of the mist, a pure white being began to materialize. I saw an angel with a strong, bright face, but not like you'd usually imagine. She was closer to a strong, Viking Valkyrie. I knew she was the special angel that watches over the women of my family, and I perceived her name to be Hellena. James saw this same being as his late father, a career Naval officer, in a white dress uniform. Rashad perceived the being to be the Enlightened One, or Buddha.More examples of shared NDEs can be found here:
"Scientific" hypotheses do not explain NDEs.
There have been several hypotheses advanced to explain NDE's by means of ordinary biological phenomena. None of these hypotheses adequately account for the observed phenomena that have been reported to occur during NDE's. For more information see the section on Near Death Experiences in the chapter on Skeptical Fallacies.
There are many reports of people observing spirits at the time of the spirit's death. Often the observer had no reason to suspect the observed person was near death. This rules out imagination as a source of the vision and proves the accuracy of the observation. Often there are multiple witnesses to the apparition which rules out hallucination as an explanation.
As I reached the top of the stairs a lady passed me who had some time left us. She was in black silk with a muslin 'cloud' over her head and shoulders, but her silk rustled. I could just have a glance only of her face. She glided fast and noiselessly (but for the silk) past me, and was lost down two steps at the end of a long passage that led only into my private boudoir, and had no other exit. I had barely exclaimed 'Oh, Caroline,' when I felt she was something unnatural, and rushed down to the drawing-room again, and sinking on my knees by my husbands side, fainted, and it was with difficulty I was restored to myself again. The next morning, I saw they rather joked me at first; but it afterwards came out that the little nursery girl, while cleaning her grate, had been so frightened by the same appearance, 'a lady sitting near her in black, with white all over her head and shoulders, and her hands crossed on her bosom,' that nothing would induce her to go into the room again; and they had been afraid to tell me over night of this confirmation of the appearance, thinking it would shake my nerves still more than it had done.Also see:
"Phantasms of the Living" by Edmund Gurney at
In the books tests, a spirit would give the position of a book on a shelf, the page number in the book, and the location on a page where an evidential message could be found. In the newspaper tests, a spirit would tell the contents of newspaper articles before they were printed. The purpose of these test was to show that mediums received information from spirits and not from the sitters by ESP or investigation since neither the medium nor the sitter could know this information.
Here is one example where the spirit gives the location and content of an item in a newspaper not yet published and the person receiving the reading confirmed the prediction.
October 4th, 1922, at 2:36 p.m.: "In to-morrow's Times, page one, column one, and near the top, see the name of a place which you much liked while away; you went to see it, but not to stay there, and were very interested. It is not the name of a county, but of a small locality."Source: "Life Beyond Death with Evidence" by Rev. Charles Drayton Thomas. Many book and newspaper tests are described in detail in this book which may be downloaded free from:
http://www.freewebs.com/psilib/ An overview of the book and newspaper tests is given in this blog entry by Michael Tymn:
Proof Positive of Spirit Communicatio?
In cross-correspondence experiments, spirits give a message through multiple mediums. There may be a simple message, or the message may be given indirectly, for example, through a literary allusion, or parts of the message may be given to different mediums and only when the parts are pieced together do they provide the complete message. These experiments show that mediums are communicating with intelligent beings rather than using their own psychic powers to provide information about the deceased. A more detailed discussions of the cross-correspondences can be found at:
"Cross-Correspondences" by Konstantin Oesterreich
(Also see "Related Articles" at the bottom of this page.)
The Eager Dead & Undying Love by Michael Tymn
A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife by Victor Zammit. Chapter 16. The Cross Correspondences.
Several examples of cross-correspondences are given in the book "Contact with the Other World" by Professor James Hyslop in chapter XIII "Experimental Incidents". This book can be downloaded free from:
Mediums sometimes receive communications from spirits who are unrelated to, and unknown by, the sitters and the medium. These spirits come through to communicate for purposes important only to themselves. They give verifiable information about their identity and cause of death.
For example, the spirit of Runolfur Runolfsson was buried with a thigh bone missing. He communicated through a medium and gave the correct location of his thigh bone which was hidden in a wall. He asked for it to be found and buried. When the wall was opened up and searched, a thigh bone was found.
For more information see:
A brief description at AECES.info:
Haraldsson E. and Stevenson, I, 1975. 'A Communicator of the Drop-in Type in Iceland: the case of Runolfur Runolfsson'. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 69. 33-59.
You can read more about drop-in communicators from these on-line sources:
The Harry Stockbridge case:
Is there Life Beyond Death?
The Biedermann drop-in case:
Haraldsson E. and Stevenson, I, 1975. 'A Communicator of the Drop-in Type in Iceland: the case of Gudni Magnusson', Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research 69, 245-261.
Proxy sittings are when a person goes to a medium on behalf of someone who is not present at the sitting. In such cases the medium and the proxy sitter may not know who the reading is for or anything about that person. In this case it is impossible for the medium to use cold reading or any previous knowledge about the person in their reading. When a medium can give verifiable information about the actual sitter and deceased individuals known to them, it is very strong proof of psychic functioning and when the medium can give specialized knowledge known only to the deceased it is very strong evidence that they are communicating with the spirit of the deceased.
in chapter V "Proxy Sittings":
Electronic devices have allowed interactive conversations with spirits that anyone can hear. A demonstration was given live on Radio Luxembourg.
Koenig installed his equipment under the watchful eyes of the Radio's own engineers and the presenter of the program, Herr Rainer Holbe. One of the Radio's staff asked if a voice could come through in direct response to his requests. Almost immediately a voice replied:Also see:'We hear your voice' and 'Otto Koenig makes wireless with the dead' (Fuller 1981:339).
The Survival Files by Miles Edward Allen
During the Scole experiments the voices of spirits were heard, objects materialized, and "images were imprinted on unopened rolls of film". These experiments were observed by a number of scientists and a professional stage-magician with more than fifty years experience in psychic research who wrote "I discovered no signs of trickery, and in my opinion such conjuring tricks were not possible, for the type of phenomena witnessed, under the conditions applied."
Source: A Lawyer Presents the Case for the Afterlife by Victor J. Zammit
There is a vast amount of proof of ESP. ESP is not limited by time or distance. It cannot be explained by the known laws of physics including quantum entanglement because there is no practical means by which entanglement in a brain may be established over large distances.
In the case of telepathy, that phenomenon cannot be the result of any physical interaction between brains because each brain has its own unique structure and any meaning in the structure in one brain will be unintelligible to any other person whether they are entangled or not. The very existence of telepathy is evidence that consciousness is not produced by the brain, i.e. consciousness is non-physical.
Since human consciousness is capable of telepathy and other forms of ESP, consciousness cannot be the result of any physical process in the brain. Consciousness must be non-physical and thus capable of existing without any physical body. The section ESP is not produced by the brain in Near-death Experiences and Afterlife Phenomena explains this in greater detail.
When physicists study matter at the subatomic level, they find that matter does not exist until it is observed by a conscious being. Double-slit experiments demonstrate that a conscious observer is required to collapse a probability wave into a particle. Quantum entanglement experiments demonstrate that certain properties of matter are not determined until they are observed by a conscious observer. Therefore consciousness is necessary first before matter can exist, so it is impossible for consciousness to have been produced by matter. Therefore the it is impossible that the brain, which is composed of matter, could produce consciousness. Founders of quantum mechanics, including Nobel Prize winners in physics such as Max Planck and Erwin Schrödinger, believed this. You can find more information on these scientists in the chapter on Eminent Researchers.
Furthermore, if something in an unstable quantum state is observed continuously by a conscious observer, it will not decay. This is called the quantum Zeno effect. The effect cannot be produced by matter alone which indicates that consciousness cannot be produced by any physical process.
Observations in quantum mechanics must be made by conscious observers according to John von Neumann:
In his treatise The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, John von Neumann deeply analyzed the so-called measurement problem. He concluded that the entire physical universe could be made subject to the Schrödinger equation (the universal wave function). Since something "outside the calculation" was needed to collapse the wave function, von Neumann concluded that the collapse was caused by the consciousness of the experimenter.Max Plank the founder of quantum mechanics and winner of the Nobel prize in physics said:
I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness. As quoted in The Observer (25 January 1931)And ...
As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.Erwin Schrödinger winner of the Nobel prize in physics wrote:
"Consciousness cannot be accounted for in physical terms. For consciousness is absolutely fundamental. It cannot be accounted for in terms of anything else." http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/325387Top
There are very good philosophical reasons to believe the mind is not produced by the brain and therefore the mind is non-physical. Peter Williams discusses several reasons for this in his article: Why Naturalists Should Mind about Physicalism, and Vice Versa, (Quodlibet Journal: Volume 4 Number 2-3, Summer 2002.)
Williams explains that if the mind and the brain were the same, then all the properties of the mind would be properties of the brain. He then demonstrates that the mind cannot be identical to the brain by giving several examples of properties of the mind that are not properties of the brain.
One example he gives is that the experience of consciousness described in the first person cannot be understood by a description of the physical brain in the third person. "I feel warm", cannot be understood in the same way as "His brain responds to impulses from nerves that sense temperature."
Thomas Nagel argues that your subjective experience of tasting chocolate cannot be reduced to any objective physical event inside your brain because any such physical state is observable by a third party, whereas your experience is not:Another example of a property of the mind that is not a property of the brain is qualia. Qualia are the qualities of things you experience subjectively, ie, the way red looks or the way happy feels. If you imagine the color pink, someone observing your brain will not see anything pink that corresponds to your mental image."If a scientist took off the top of your skull and looked into your brain while you were eating the chocolate bar, all he would see is a grey mass of neurons. If he used instruments to measure what was happening inside, he would detect complicated physical processes of many different kinds. But would he find the taste of chocolate? It seems as if he couldn't find it in your brain, because your experience of tasting chocolate is locked inside your mind in a way that makes it unobservable by anyone else. . . Your experiences are inside your mind with a kind of insideness that is different from the way that your brain is inside your head.
Gary R. Habermas and J.P.Moreland argue against physicalism from the ‘qualia’ of imagined sensory images. Qualia is the subjective feel or texture of conscious experience:Williams gives several more examples. These include intentionality, the ability to reason, free will, and moral responsibility. See the linked article for an explanation of why these phenomena demonstrate that the mind cannot be made of matter. Williams concludes:
At the very least, the mind has several immaterial properties ... It follows that no merely physical explanation of the mind is possible.Edward Feser has several posts on his blog that also discuss why the mind cannot be produced by physical causes: Some Brief Arguments for Dualism
Mind Body Problem Roundup
Some researchers have considered whether afterlife phenomena can be explained by the psychic powers of living persons simulating afterlife phenomena. This possibility does not stand up well under close scrutiny. This is discussed on my blog in the post Survival and Super-Psi.
The venerable psychical researcher Montague Keen collected a list of twenty cases suggestive of survival. This list was based on a similar list originally published by Professor Archie Roy in The Paranormal Review, a magazine published by The Society for Psychical Research. The original references for a number of these cases are available on the internet. Some of the cases can be found in on-line books written by the same author as the referenced article. Descriptions of many of the remaining cases can also be found on various websites on the internet.
Afterlife research should have been accepted by mainstream science long ago. There was sufficient evidence reported by highly reputable scientists for this to have occurred as early as 1922.
Brian David Josephson recipient of the the 1973 Nobel Prize for Physics wrote:
"What are the implications for science of the fact that psychic functioning appears to be a real effect? These phenomena seem mysterious, but no more mysterious perhaps than strange phenomena of the past which science has now happily incorporated within its scope."Charles Robert Richet winner of the 1913 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine conducted his own investigations into the afterlife and wrote:
The "guide" of the medium (i.e., the new personality that appears) then seems to be a genuinely extraneous intelligence. These phenomena can rightly be called metapsychic because, taking them all in all, the normal intelligence of the sensitive is quite insufficient to explain the strange and potent cryptesthesia. From: Mediums and Metapsychics by Charles RichetSir William Crookes, discoverer of the element thallium and inventor the cathode-ray tube started out as a skeptic but after examining the medium D.D. Home for himself came to believe:
"Of all persons endowed with a powerful development of this Psychic Force, Mr. Daniel Dunglas Home is the most remarkable and it is mainly owing to the many opportunities I have had of carrying on my investigation in his presence that I am enabled to affirm so conclusively the existence of this force." From: Researches into the Phenomena of Spiritualism by Sir William CrookesGary Schwartz has published numerous research articles demonstrating the accuracy of mediums in scientific experiments including a triple-blind experiment in which the medium has no contact with the person getting the reading. This eliminates cold reading or the use of previous knowledge as an explanation for mental mediumship. Anomalous Information Reception By Research Mediums Demonstrated Using A Novel Triple -Blind Protocol
These scientists were not fooled by magic tricks. Highly skilled stage magicians have investigated many mediums and have found them to be genuine (see the chapter on Skeptical Fallacies for more information and links).
Studies have shown people with more education are more likely to believe in the afterlife, and most medical doctors believe in the afterlife (see the chapter on Skeptical Fallacies for more information and links).
See the chapter on Eminent Researchers for more eminent researchers.
If you want to read more about the evidence for the afterlife, there are several recommendations in the section above on Detailed Overviews. If you would like to read a more in depth discussion by the researchers who collected the evidence, the following books may be of interest to you.
William Barrett: Death Bed Visions
A compilation of first hand accounts of death-bed visions of spirits. Reports including multiple witness accounts and visions of spirits of individuals who had died but who's death was not yet known.
Julie Beischel, Gary E. Schwartz: "Anomalous Information Reception by Research Mediums Demonstrated Using a Novel Triple-Blind Protocol" Explore (New York, N.Y.) 1 January 2007 (volume 3 issue 1 Pages 23-27 )
This paper describes a modern triple-blind experiment in which the medium had no contact with the person getting the reading. It eliminates cold reading or the use of previous knowledge as an explanation for mental mediumship.
Sir William Crookes:
Researches Into the Phenomena of Modern Spiritualism
Describes the author's observations of the mediumship of D.D. Home and Florence Cook. Crookes was the discoverer the element thallium and inventor the cathode-ray tube. He started out as a skeptic but after conducting his own research became a believer.
Edmund Gurney: "Phantasms of the Living"
Erlendur Haraldsson & Ian Stevenson (1975). A communicator of the "drop in" type in Iceland: The case of Runolfur Runolfsson. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 69, 33-59.
This case is frequently cited to refute the super-psi hypothesis because the spirit was not related to the medium or sitters, gave verifiable information, and communicated for reasons that were meaningful only to himself. He gave the location of a thigh bone hidden in a wall and asked that it be buried because it was from his own corpse.
Loftur R. Gissurarson & Erlendur Haraldsson (1989). The Icelandic Physical Medium Indridi Indridason. Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research, 57, 53-148.
Erlendur Haraldsson & Ian Stevenson (1975). A communicator of the "drop in" type in Iceland: The case of Gudni Magnusson. Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research, 69, 245-261.
Anna Hude: "The Evidence for Communication with the Dead"
Professor James Hyslop: "Contact with the Other World"
Describes examples of the cross correspondence experiments.
William James: "Human Immortality: Two Supposed Objections to the Doctrine"
Sir Oliver Lodge: The Survival of Man
Frederic William Henry Myers: "Human Personality and its Survival of Bodily Death"
Charles Richet: "Thirty Years of Psychical Research"
http://survivalebooks.org/#Thirty Years of Psychical Research
Charles Robert Richet was the winner of the 1913 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine. This book is an account of his own investigations of mediums.
Michael Sage: "Mrs. Piper & the Society for Psychical Research"
Ian Stevenson: Birthmarks and Birth Defects Corresponding to Wounds on Deceased Persons, Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 403-410, 1993
Charles Drayton Thomas: An Amazing Experiment
The spirit of Bobby Newlove provides evidence of his identity through the mediumship of Mrs Leonard.
Rev. Charles Drayton Thomas: "Life Beyond Death with Evidence"
Describes many of the book and newspaper tests.
Baron Von Schrenck Notzing: "Phenomena of Materialisation"
Detailed accounts of experiments that prove the reality of ectoplasm and materialization of spirits.
Alfred Russel Wallace: "Miracles and Modern Spiritualism"
The scientists who discovered the theory of natural selection at the same time as Charles Darwin also investigated afterlife phenomena and mediums. He started out as a skeptic but his observations caused him to recognize the truth of the afterlife.
Neville Whymant: "Psychic Adventures In New York"
A scholar of Asian languages describes his experience at a sitting with a direct voice medium who brings through a spirit speaking an ancient Chinese dialect who is able to clarify points about a poem that had baffled modern scholars.
"Journal of the Society for Psychical Research" and "Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research
Journal of the Society for Psychical Research
Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research
Proceedings of the American Society for Psychical Research
Mrs. Piper in the Proceedings of the Society for Psychical Research