The Liberation of the Death Camps
Source: The Liberation of the Camps: Facts vs. Lies, by Theodore J. O’Keefe
Presented with pictures, captions and extensive commentary by Lasha Darkmoon
Presented with pictures, captions and extensive commentary by Lasha Darkmoon
Why is it illegal in 16 countries to doubt the gas chambers when not a single gas chamber has ever been found?
Nothing
has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of the
Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes that
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at the
close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen,
and other work and detention camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered
heaps of dead and dying inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told
them hair-raising stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their
claims by showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas
chambers, supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed from
dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that
many Americans who remembered the atrocity stories fed them during World
War I still doubted the Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler
regime, resolved to “document” what the GIs had found in the camps.
Prominent newsmen and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing
evidence, while the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the
scenes for posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in
tones of horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and
shown, and Dachau and Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of
the American populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and
bloody history of this planet.
For Americans, what was “discovered” at the
camps — the dead and the diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates,
all the props of torture and terror — became the basis not simply of a
transitory propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was
true: the Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in
lethal gas chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of
films that were mandatory viewing for the vanquished populace of
Germany, to “re-educate” the German people by destroying their national
pride and their will to a united, independent national state, imposing
in their place overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political
impotence. And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg
Tribunal incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans
were told about Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US
Army, the Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of
the most authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in
the human record.
A Different Reality
But it is known today that, very soon after
the liberation of the camps, American authorities were aware that the
real story of the camps was quite different from the one in which they
were coaching military public information officers, government
spokesmen, politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When
American and British forces overran western and central Germany in the
spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with discovering
and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson,
one of America’s leading forensic pathologists, who was assigned to the
US Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Department. As part of a US War
Crimes Investigation Team, Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and
some twenty other German camps, examining on some days more than 100
corpses. After his grim work at Dachau, he was questioned for three days
by US Army prosecutors. [1]
Dr. Larson’s findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: “What we’ve heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that is a hoax.”
[2] And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his biographer
that to his knowledge he “was the only forensic pathologist on duty in
the entire European Theater” of Allied military operations, [3]
confirmed that “never was a case of poison gas uncovered.” [4]
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate
victims at Dachau, Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they
tortured to death or deliberately starved? The answers to these
questions are known as well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men
discovered, the chief cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other
camps was disease, above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of
mankind that until recently flourished in places where populations were
crowded together in circumstances where public health measures were
unknown or had broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded
internment camps in Germany at war’s end, where, despite such measures
as systematic delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the
dead, the virtual collapse of Germany’s food, transport, and public
health systems led to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of
the facts as to typhus and mortality in the camps has been made by Dr.
John E. Gordon, M.D., Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and
epidemiology at the Harvard University School of Public Health, who was
with US forces in Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that “The
outbreaks in concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of
typhus infection encountered in Germany.” Dr. Gordon summarized the
causes for the outbreaks as follows: [5]
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that, homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them …
Germany was in chaos. The destruction of
whole cities and the path left by advancing armies produced a disruption
of living conditions contributing to the spread of the disease.
Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were seriously disrupted,
food supply and food distribution was poor, housing was inadequate and
order and discipline were everywhere lacking. Still more important, a
shifting of populations was occurring such as few countries and few
times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon’s findings are corroborated by
Dr. Russell Barton, today a psychiatrist of international repute, who
entered Bergen-Belsen with British forces as a young medical student in
1945. Barton, who volunteered to care for the diseased survivors,
testified under sworn oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that
“Thousands of prisoners who died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp
during World War II weren’t deliberately starved to death but died from
a rash of diseases.” [6]
Dr. Barton further testified that on
entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but
decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped
kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942,
of food cooked and dispensed each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and
widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has been able
to document a German policy of extermination through starvation in the
German camps.
No ‘Human Skin’ Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of
concentration camp inmates skinned for their tattoos, flayed to make
lampshades and handbags, or other artifacts? What of the innumerable
“torture racks,” “meathooks,” whipping posts, gallows, and other tools
of torment and death that are reported to have abounded at every German
camp? These allegations, and even more grotesque ones proffered by
Soviet prosecutors, found their way into the record at Nuremberg.
The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch, dubbed by journalists the “Bitch of Buchenwald,” who was reported to have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned hides of luckless inmates.
But General Lucius Clay, military governor
of the US zone of occupied Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told
his superiors in Washington: “There is no convincing evidence that she
[Ilse Koch] selected inmates for extermination in order to secure
tattooed skins or that she possessed any articles made of human skin.”
[7] In an interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the
material for the infamous lampshades: “Well, it turned out actually that
it was goat flesh. But at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for her to have gotten a fair trial.” [8]
Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German jail in 1967.
† Lasha Darkmoon comments:
It is now common knowledge that all the tall stories relating to Jewish
skin being turned into lamp shades are grotesque fabrications. There is
not a single Holocaust scholar in the world today who believes these
fairy tales any longer. Even Jewish Wikipedia asks the question, “Did
the Germans make lamp shades from prisoners’ skin?” and gives the
answer: “No, they didn’t…it seems to be a popular urban legend.”
In spite of
this, “Holocaust survivors” still continue to spread these false stories
in schools across the country, perverting the minds of children with
their vicious lies. One such is Czechoslovakian Jewess Frida Herskovits
who told schoolchildren quite recently that she had learned of Nazi
surgeries in which Jewish “organs were removed and human skin was used to make lamp shades and picture frames.”
Frida had not
only seen Nazi guards throw sick Jews into a ditch and burn them alive
after dousing them with kerosene—“The screams were unbelievable!”—she
had also witnessed with her own eyes a pregnant mother have her baby
ripped out of her womb by German Shepherd dogs!
If you want to see a photo of Frida, looking unusually jolly for a woman so traumatized, click here.
It would be tedious to itemize and refute
the thousands of bizarre claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were
instances of German cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr.
Konrad Morgen, a legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal
Police, whose statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never
been challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler, commander of Hitler’s SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any
German concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and
corruption on the part of camp personnel.
As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. [9] Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse’s husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain
cases did inflict physical punishment, such acts had to be approved by
authorities in Berlin, and it was required that a camp physician first
certify the good health of the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be
on hand at the actual beating. [10] After all, throughout most of the
war the camps were important centers of industrial activity. The good
health and morale of the prisoners was critical to the German war
effort, as is evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General
Richard Glücks, chief of the office that supervised the concentration
camps. It held the camp commanders “personally responsible for
exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical strength of the
detainees.” [11]
Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at
Buchenwald and other camps, quickly ascertained what was common
knowledge among veteran inmates: that the worst offenders, the cruelest
denizens of the camps, were not the guards but the prisoners themselves.
Common criminals of the same stripe as those who populate US prisons
today committed many villainies, particularly when they held positions
of authority, and fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their
many political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness.
Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald,
Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated
circumstances in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report
submitted to their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred
Toombs, their commander, who wrote a preface to the report, “how the
prisoners themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror.”
[12]
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and Communists as follows:
The [Jewish] trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death … The Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian
of the American military government in Germany, summarized the
Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an article published in an American magazine
shortly after the war. Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American
investigators’ findings:
“It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the Communists ate; those who didn’t starved to death.” [13]
Additional corroboration of inmate
brutality has been provided by Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of
Counter-Intelligence Arrests and Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was
involved in the liberation of Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of
history at San Bernardino Valley College in California, wrote in 1966
that at Dachau “the prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted
the barbarities on their fellow prisoners.” [14]
† Lasha Darkmoon comments: Another Jewish Holocaust survivor, Yanina Cywinska, tells us she had witnessed evil Nazis “parade around briefcases and lamps made of human skin while washing their bodies with soap composed of Jewish bones.” She is obviously unaware that the human soap story has been proved every bit as false as the human lamp shade story.In 1981, professor of Modern Jewish History and Holocaust expert Deborah Lipstadt wrote in a letter to the Los Angeles Times that “the fact is, the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter, anyone else, for the production of soap. The soap rumor was thoroughly investigated after the war and proved to be untrue.”Shmuel Krakowski, Director of Archives of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust Center, confirmed in a Chicago Tribune article titled, “A Holocaust Belief Cleared Up” that: “historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat.”This doesn’t stop Yanina Cywinska and other “Holocaust Survivors” like her from manufacturing human soap and lampshade stories ad infinitum.Yanina had seen some horrible things happen in the concentration camps, including “nails and eyes pulled out of Jewish people.” This would probably account for her pessimism and negative attitude toward Yaveh. “If God is so almighty power,” she asks grimly, “why didn’t he stop the atrocities?” Good question. We’ll leave that to God.If you want to see a photo of Yanina, looking particularly jolly for a woman so traumatized, click here.
‘Gas Chambers’
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel
Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel Edward J. Gully inspected the German
concentration camp at Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted
their findings to their superiors, who subsequently forwarded their
report to the US War Crimes Division. While, significantly, the full
text of their report has never been published, it has been revealed, by a
historian supportive of Holocaust claims, that the two investigators
were careful to characterize equipment exhibited to them by French
informants as a “so-called lethal gas chamber,” and to claim it was “allegedly used as a lethal gas chamber.” [15] (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the
Natzweiler report, and its effective suppression, stand in stark
contrast to the credulity, the confusion, and the blaring publicity that
accompanied official reports of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At
first, a US Army photo depicting a GI gazing at a steel door marked with
a skull and crossbones and the German words for: “Caution! Gas! Mortal
danger! Don’t open!,” was identified as showing the murder weapon. [16]
Later, however, it was evidently decided
that the apparatus in question was merely a standard delousing chamber
for clothing, and another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly
disguised as a shower room, was exhibited to American congressmen and
journalists as the site where thousands breathed their last. While there
exist numerous reports in the press as to the operation of this second
“gas chamber,” no official report by trained Army investigators has yet
surfaced to reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads:
Were they “dummies,” or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them?
(Each theory has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)
As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald,
Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps liberated by the Allies in western
Germany. There was no end of propaganda about “gas chambers,” “gas
ovens,” and the like, but so far not a single detailed description of the murder weapon
and its function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for
the successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust
authorities have now publicly decreed that there were no gassings, no
extermination camps in Germany after all. (We are now told that
“gassing” and “extermination” camps were located exclusively in what is
now Poland, in areas captured by the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits
to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based
Institute for Contemporary History, which is funded by the German
government, stated categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly
Die Zeit: “Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were
Jews or other prisoners gassed.” [17] Professional “Nazi hunter” Simon
Wiesenthal stated in 1975 and again in 1993 that “there were no
extermination camps on German soil.” [18]
Dachau “gas chamber” No. 2, which was once
presented to a stunned and grieving world as a weapon that claimed
hundreds of thousands of lives, is now described in the brochure issued
to tourists at the modern Dachau “memorial site” in these words: “This
gas chamber, camouflaged as a shower room, was not used.” [19]
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops
entered Dachau, Buchenwald and other German camps, and trained American
investigators established the facts as to what had gone on in them, the
government in Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the
print media in New York continue to churn out millions of words and
images annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the
Holocaust. Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated
Confederacy, no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and
devastating defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the
politicians and bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his
concentration camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our
opinion makers continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the
facts about the camps.
† Lasha Darkmoon comments: The story of Holocaust survivor Rivska Yosselevska is even more horrific and bizarre than those of Frida Herskovits and Yanina Cywinska related above. Despite being shot in the head and thrown into a pit with a mass of Jewish corpses piled on top of her, Rivska managed to claw her way to the top of the seething heap of limbs and somehow make her escape under the vigilant eyes of the Nazi guards. It wasn’t an easy job, given that the “dying victims” in the pit were “biting my legs, pulling me down.”Other Jews also managed to crawl out of the pit and do a bunk for it, but the Nazis tracked them down and killed them all. Only Rivska survived to tell the tale. She lay three days by the side of the pit, utterly traumatized, “and saw blood spurting out of the ground.”If you want to see a photo of Rivska, looking suitably traumatized, click here.
Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the
professional historians reveal the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and
the other camps. It is time they let the American public know how the
inmates died, and how they didn’t die. It is time that the claims of
mass murder by gassing are clarified and investigated in the same manner
as any other claims of murder. It is time that the free ride certain
groups have enjoyed as the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be
terminated, just as it is time to end the scapegoating of other groups,
including Germans, eastern Europeans, the Roman Catholic hierarchy, and
the wartime leadership of America and Britain, either for their alleged
role in the Holocaust or their supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of
this great Republic have the facts about the camps, facts they have a
right to know, a right that is fundamental to the exercise of their
authority and their will in the governance of their country. As citizens
and as taxpayers, Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths,
have a basic right and an overriding interest in determining the facts
of incidents that are deemed by those in positions of power to be
significant in determining America’s foreign and educational policy, as
well as its selection of past events to be memorialized in our civic
life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust
are at issue all over the civilized world. The truth will be decided
only by recourse to the facts, in the public forum: not by concealing
the facts, denying the truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out,
and it is time the government of this country, and governments and
international bodies throughout the world, make public the evidence of
what actually transpired in the German concentration camps in the years
1933-1945, so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor,
and carry out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be
the granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a
peace based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army
investigations as to the truth about the wartime German concentration
camps have since been corroborated by all subsequent investigators and
can be summarized:
The harrowing scenes of dead and dying
inmates were not the result of a German policy of “extermination,” but
rather the result of epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about
largely by the effects of Allied aerial attacks.
Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists
who turned Jews and others into handbags and lampshades for their
private profit or amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies;
indeed, the German authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the
part of camp commanders and guards.
On the other hand, portrayals of the newly
liberated inmates as saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often
very far from the truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on
camp detainees were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention
of German policy and German orders.
The
alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for bathing
camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they were used
to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible fabrication.
Orthodox historians and professional “Nazi-hunters” have quietly dropped
claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald and other camps
in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent regarding the lies
about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an open discussion of
the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and the other camps
captured by the Soviets.
† Lasha Darkmoon comments: Did you know that that there is a Holocaust memorial center in Cuba where bars of soap allegedly made from Jewish fat are buried and held in high honor by endless streams of gullible tourists? The plaque reads: “Honoring their memory. In this place are buried pieces of soap made from Jewish human fat, part of 6 million victims of Nazi barbarism of the 2oth century. Peace to their remains.”To read the plaque in Spanish, click here.It’s the same old story in superstitious Rumania. In the town of Targu Mures, pilgrims pray over bars of soap allegedly made of “pure Jewish fat.” Quite a brisk trade is apparently done in these soap bars, each inscribed with the initials ‘RJF’—Reine Jüdisch Fett (pure Jewish fat). Needless to say, the soap is not meant to be used but to be buried in the cemetery at Targu Mures where people come to pray over the holy soap. Forensic analysis of the soap is not permitted; it is too sacred. (See here)
------------------------
Robert
Faurisson formulated this famous “60-word sentence” in 1980. It
constitutes the position of most Holocaust Revisionist scholars today,
in open defiance of the mainstream narrative:
“The alleged Hitlerite gas chambers and the alleged genocide of the Jews constitute one and the same historical lie, which made possible a gigantic financial-political fraud, the principal beneficiaries of which are the State of Israel and international Zionism, and whose principal victims are the German people—but not their leaders—and the entire Palestinian people.”
Notes
1. John D. McCallum, Crime Doctor [a
biography of Dr. Charles P. Larson] (Mercer, Wash.: The Writing Works,
1978), pp. 44-46, 59, 69; See also: J. Cobden, “The Dachau Gas Chamber
Myth,” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 1995, pp. 17-18.
2. Jane Floerchinger, “Concentration Camp Conditions Killed Most Inmates, Doctor Says,” The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.
3. J. D. McCallum, Crime Doctor (1978), p. 46.
4. The Wichita Eagle, April 1, 1980, p. 4C.
5. John E. Gordon, “Louse-Borne Typhus
Fever in the European Theater of Operations, U.S. Army, 1945,” in Forest
Ray Moulton, editor, Rickettsial Diseases of Man (Washington, DC:
American Academy for the Advancement of Science, 1948), pp. 16-27.
Quoted in: Friedrich P. Berg, “Typhus and the Jews,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1988-89, pp. 444-447, and in Arthur Butz, The
Hoax of the Twentieth Century (IHR, 1993), pp. 46-47.
6. “Disease killed Nazis’ prisoners, MD
says,” Toronto Star, Feb. 8, 1985, p. A2. On Barton’s similar testimony
in a 1988 Toronto trial, see: Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million
Really Die? (Toronto: Samisdat, 1992), pp. 175-180, and, Robert Lenski,
The Holocaust on Trial (1990), pp. 157-160, and, M. Weber,
“Bergen-Belsen Camp: The Suppressed Story,” The Journal of Historical
Review, May-June 1995, pp. 27, 30 (n. 30).
7. “Clay Explains Cut in Ilse Koch Term,” The New York Times, Sept. 24, 1948, p. 3.
8. Interview with Lucius Clay, 1976,
Official Proceeding of the George C. Marshall Research Foundation.
Quoted in M. Weber, “Buchenwald: Legend and Reality,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1986-87 (Vol. 7, No. 4), pp. 406-407.
9. International Military Tribunal (IMT),
Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military
Tribunal (Nuremberg: 1947-1949 [“blue series”]), Vol. 20, pp. 489, 438.
10. Eugen Kogon, The Theory and Practice of
Hell (New York: Berkley Books [pb.], 1984), pp. 108-109. See also:
“Punishment for Mistreating SS Camp Prisoners,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Jan.-Feb. 1995, p. 33.
11. Nuremberg document NO-1523. Published
in Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunal (NMT
“green series”), Vol. 4, pp. 372-373.
12. Egon W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum,
Buchenwald: A Preliminary Report, US Army, 12th Army Group, April 24,
1945. National Archives, RG 331, SHAEF, G-5, 17.11, Jacket 10, Box 151.
Quoted in: M. Weber, “Buchenwald: Legend and Reality,” The Journal of
Historical Review, Winter 1986-87, pp. 408-409.
13. Donald B. Robinson, “Communist Atrocities at Buchenwald,” American Mercury, October 1946, pp. 397-404.
14. San Bernardino Sun-Telegram, March 13,
1966. Quoted in: James J. Martin, The Man Who Invented ‘Genocide’ (IHR,
1984), pp. 110-111.
15. “Concentration Camp at Natzwiller
[sic],” RG 331, Records of Allied Operations and Occupation,
SHAEF/G-5/2717, Modern Military, National Archives (Washington, DC).
Quoted in: Robert H. Abzug, Inside the Vicious Heart (New York: Oxford
University Press, 1985), pp. 9-10, 181 (n. 5).
16. John Cobden, Dachau: Reality and Myth
(IHR, 1994), pp. 25-29. See also: The Journal of Historical Review,
May-June 1993, pp. 9-11; The Journal of Historical Review, March- April
1995, p. 16.
17. “Keine Vergasung in Dachau,” Die Zeit
(Hamburg), August 19, 1960. Facsimile reprint, and English-language
translation, in The Journal of Historical Review, May-June 1993, p. 12.
18. Letters in Books & Bookmen
(London), April 1975, p. 5, and in The Stars and Stripes (European
edition), Jan. 24, 1993, p. 14. Wiesenthal’s 1993 Stars and Stripes
letter is reprinted in facsimile in The Journal of Historical Review,
May-June 1993, p. 10.
19. Memorial Site Concentration Camp Dachau. Leaflet published by the International Dachau-Committee (Dachau, Germany), no date.
Theodore J. O’Keefe
is the author of numerous published articles, essays and reviews on
historical and political subjects. For some years he served as editor of
the IHR’s Journal of Historical Review.
Here is an Italian version of the article, translated by ‘Anonymo’:
LA LIBERAZIONE DEI CAMPI: FATTI CONTRO MENZOGNE.
LA LIBERAZIONE DEI CAMPI: FATTI CONTRO MENZOGNE.
https://www.darkmoon.me/2013/the-liberation-of-the-death-camps/
No comments:
Post a Comment