Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-WhiteIn Africa, there are no “anti-racists” telling Africans they have no right to patrol their borders and kick out illegal immigrants.
The Liberian constitution states that only Black people can be citizens. Why aren’t “anti-racist” groups screaming at Liberia? Why is this not front page news? Because no one cares that there is a country only for Black people.
In Asia, there are no “anti-racists” telling Asians that mixed race people are genetically superior to separate races, and the whole world should all mix together (but only in Asia).
Many Asian countries, like Japan, have strong economies, low birth-rates, colonial histories, and almost no immigrants or refugees. So which countries are “anti-racists” trying to open to immigrants and refugees? Eastern Europe, of course! It’s full of White people.
This agenda is ONLY forced on White countries. The people who scream “diversity” and “progress” say that they are “anti-racist”.
Bielefeld University, Germany.
But, according to their actions, the only countries in need of “diversity”, “progress”, and “anti-racism” are White; whether rich or poor, high birth-rate or low birth-rate, colonial history or no colonial history.
Some coincidence, huh?
That’s why anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Diversity is a codeword for White genocide
Why is diversity a codeword for White genocide?No anti-Whites say a 100% Black area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Asian area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Muslim area needs more diversity.
No anti-Whites say a 100% Indian area needs more diversity.
When it comes to “diversity”, anti-Whites make two distinctions: 1. Anyone non-White is “diverse”, and 2. anyone White is not “diverse”.
“Diverse” simply means a place without any White people in it.
So every time they talk about a “lack of diversity”, they have said what their object is : a place that becomes less and less White – which is genocide.
That’s why diversity is a codeword for White genocide.
The “R-Word”.“Racist” has been the greatest single weapon in the arsenal of anti-Whites since it first started being used around 1960. It is their attack word.
An attack word causes people to react, usually in defense.
Their attack word, “racist“, often makes people defend themselves, by saying: “I’m not a racist because I have Black/Asian/Mexican/Muslim friends“, you will have probably seen this in your everyday lives.
The best solution to this anti-White attack word is not to ignore, or not to deny it; the best solution is to attack it. In response to “racist“, we say: “You’re only saying that because I’m White – anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.”
Our attack word is “anti-white“, and it is designed to get anti-Whites in that same defensive position: “I’m not anti-White because I am White“.
What that phrase does is set you up to deliver another point. The next point you should deliver is: “If you’re not anti-White, why do so called ‘anti-racists’ never call something ‘too Black’ or ‘too Asian’ and ‘in need of diversity’?”
We never want to be on the defensive. In a court of law, the prosecution does not get asked questions and called names by the defendant – that would be silly.
We are the prosecution, we are charging anti-Whites with the crime of White genocide, or with supporting White genocide. The prosecution makes a point and asks a question to reinforce that point.
Our word “anti-White“, hurts anti-Whites position because unlike their accusation, ours it true – and they know they are anti-White, but they have never positioned themselves that way. They have always positioned themselves as “anti-racist“, or “progressive“, or some other feel-good word.
Anti-Whites regularly talk about how they want this “mixed race future” for the planet. However, when a country in Africa is 99% Black, no anti-Whites have EVER called on that country to bring in more non-Black people, in an attempt to make Black people the minority, or in their words, make that 99% Black country a “diverse” country.
All these policies of creating a “mixed race future” are demanded in White countries – and ONLY White countries. That is NOT a “progressive social experiment” – that is genocide.
Calling all anti-Whites “anti-White” will change the debate in society from: “someone who wants a White majority is racist”, to: “someone who wants a White minority is anti-White”.
White countries for everyone?
Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, but White countries for everyone?Anti-Whites all agree that Africa belongs to Black people, and the various mixed-race Muslim groups in North Africa. So when White people in the past, or the Chinese today move into Africa so much that Black people become a minority – anti-Whites all agree that’s wrong.
Similarly, anti-Whites all agree that Asia belongs to Asian (Oriental, and Indian) people.
Anti-Whites will never go to these countries and campaign so that millions of immigrants can pour into a non-White country and “diversify” some of the homogenous non-White countries, such as Japan which is 98.5% Japanese as well as being a first world country.
Africa would benefit from millions of Asian or South American immigrants to do the work that Africans don’t want to do, or can’t do. But, anti-Whites don’t object to the fact that millions of non-Black immigrants moving into Africa would eventually make Africa minority Black.
So you see, open borders policies only ever apply to White countries. White countries are not meant to be for a specific group of people, anti-Whites say. They say that all White countries today are meant to exist for an idea – not a race or group of people.
It is very ironic that democracy is one of the ideas anti-Whites claim “Western” (White) countries should exist for. It’s ironic because they ignore the opinion of the majority of people, and go ahead and promote this “mixed race melting pot of diversity”, where White countries used to be.
Black countries exist for Black people. Asian countries exist for Asians, but White countries are for everyone? That’s genocide!
The MantraASIA FOR THE ASIANS, AFRICA FOR THE AFRICANS, WHITE COUNTRIES FOR EVERYBODY!
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.