Hercolano2

Friday, October 7, 2011

911-White Jet

NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet From Jon Carlson carlson.jon@att.net 4-15-5

Two months after 9/11 the Philadelphia Daily News investigated the Flight 93 saga, highlighting a small unmarked white jet that was seen by many people before, during, and after the Flight 93 crash.

An excerpt:

THE MYSTERY PLANE. Many people in the Shanksville area, including some interviewed by the Daily News, saw a fast-moving, unmarked small jet fly overhead a very short time after Flight 93 crashed.

http://web.archive.org/web/20011116093836/http://dailynews.philly.com/
content/daily_news/local/2001/11/15/SHOT15c.htm

Since there are no photos of the white jet in Pennsylvania it is best to look at the photos of the white jet flying the skies of NYC on 9/11.

Readers of the Rense article - 'On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School - at http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm are aware that a Bell 212 helicopter served as the remote control station for the South Tower airliner crash. Other articles verified remote control antennas on the South Tower airliner:

Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM

http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm

Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified

http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm

The CNN video, America Remembers, caught the Helicopter hoving near the WTC. The circled area is an antenna for receiving video from the ST airliner and the two white objects on the bottom of the boom are blade antennas that communicate with the blade antennas on the ST airliner. An operator in the helicopter sits at a monitor viewing video from the airliner and uses the blade antennas to remote control the ST airliner. NOTICE that the helicopter is UNMARKED.

Since the crash imprints in both WTC towers are 'like peas in a pod' it is a safe assumption to make that the type of aircraft that struck the South Tower also struck the North Tower. See Rense article, WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767, at

http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

.

HOWEVER, the remote control station at the North Tower was 'a small white jet'. The white jet flies in-formation right above the airliner so as not to be seen by ground observers BUT CAUGHT BY THE CAMERAS.

VIEW the complete video here:http://www.taner.net/wtc/media/First_Plane_Crash_SLOW_.mpeg

Craig Hill's video, Treason, Inc. (www.hillsenatenow.org) shows the formation flying in slow motion.

The white jet was also caught by the cameras at the South Tower crash:

The white jet guided the ST airliner to Manhattan Island but 'handed off' final control to the helicoper. A Japanese tourist caught the white jet handoff from the opposite side. http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/WTC2.html

VIEW the CNN video online at:

http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo/wtc+ufo_animation.gif

The white jet was caught making a shadow on the North Tower on its ST crash flyby.

As the North Tower is 208 feet across and the shadow is about 1/6 of that distance, the white jet is about 35 feet long.

Another camera caught the white jet on its trip to Pennsylvania AFTER its ST crash flyby.

After the Pennsylvania trip the white jet RETURNED for its GRAND FINALE:

PENNSYLVANIA WITNESSES described the white jet in exacting detail. The Saab 105 SK60 military jet used in the Swedish and Austrian Air Forces fits their descriptions and its 36 foot length fits the shadow made on the North Tower. Of course, the jet had a white paintjob for 9/11 with all markings painted over to hide its identification from ground observers.

Photos, information of the Saab 105 SK60 military jet.

http://user.tninet.se/~xpz458v/SAAB105-SK60_english.htm

http://www.canit.se/~griffon/aviation/text/60saab105.html

Richard Wallace, US Editor of the THE DAILY MIRROR, shows how the British report the news of Flight 93.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?
objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143

1) Susan Mcelwain: There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look.

"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side. I haven't found one like it on the internet. It definitely wasn't one of those executive jets. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.

"Then they changed their story and tried to say it was a plane taking pictures of the crash 3,000ft up.

"But I saw it and it was there before the crash and it was 40 feet above my head. They did not want my story - nobody here did."

THE MIRROR REPORTED:

The FBI's later explanation for the white jet was that a passing civilian Fairchild Falcon 20 jet was asked to descend from 34,000ft to 5,000ft some minutes after the crash to give co-ordinates for the site. The plane and pilot have never been produced or identified. Susan Mcelwain says a Falcon 20 was not the plane she saw.

The FBI insists there was no military plane in the area but at 9.22am a sonic boom - caused by a supersonic jet - was picked up by an earthquake monitor in southern Pennsylvania, 60 miles away from Shanksville.

2) Lee Purbaugh: There was another plane," Lee said. "I didn't get a good look but it was white and it circled the area about twice and then it flew off over the horizon."

3) Tom Spinelli: "I saw the white plane," "It was flying around all over the place like it was looking for something. I saw it before and after the crash."

4) Dennis Decker, 5) Rick Chaney: About a mile north on Buckstown Road, Dennis Decker and Rick Chaney were at work making wooden pallets when they heard an explosion and came running outside to watch a large mushroom cloud spreading over the ridge." As soon as we looked up, we saw a midsized jet flying low and fast," Decker said. "It appeared to make a loop or part of a circle, and then it turned fast and headed out. " Decker and Chaney described the plane as a Lear-jet type, with engines mounted near the tail and painted white with no identifying markings. "If you were here to see it, you'd have no doubt," Decker said. "It was a jet plane, and it had to be flying real close when that 757 went down. If I was the FBI, I'd find out who was driving that plane. "

6) Robin Doppstadt: Robin Doppstadt was working inside her family food-and-supply store when she heard the crash. When she went outside, she said, she saw a small white jet that looked like it was making a single circle over the crash site. "Then it climbed very quickly and took off. "

7) Dale Browning who witnessed the white plane, "the damndest darn thing", remarked:

"Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is."

8) Jim Brant: Mr. Brant and two of his employees arrived at the site in minutes , hoping to help survivors. He said he noticed a white plane, perhaps a jet, circling the wreckage. "It reminded me of a fighter jet," he said. He said it stayed there for one or two minutes before leaving. "The plane had no markings on it, either civilian or military."

9) John Feegle: "It didn't look like a commercial plane," Feegle said. "It had a real goofy tail on it, like a high tail. It circled around, and it was gone." "The aircraft appeared to have an unusually tall vertical stabilizer."

THE PHILADELPHIA DAILY NEWS:

10) Kathy Blades and her son ran outside after the crash and saw the jet, with sleek back wings and an angled cockpit, race overhead.

KARL SCHWARZ has the big Pentagon picture in hard-hitting analysis

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/020205Schwarz/020205schwarz.html

(Note the html link ending.)

Visit www.karlschwarz.com for the big 9/11 picture and more.

In the hardest hitting journalism since 9/11, THE POWER HOUR RADIO SHOW has totally revamped and added new analysis to an earlier video. 911 IN PLANE SITE, The Director's Cut. Visit www.policestate21.com to order. A quote from their South Tower airliner video analysis: "...there was some sort of incendiary or explosive that would serve as a match to ignite the enormous amount of fuel (when the plane hit the ST.)" http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm has the full story.

Craig Hill also has revamped his dynamite video, Treason, Inc.

http://hillsenatenow.org/

DON'T MISS:

On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School

http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm

WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767

http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm

Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified

http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm

Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM

http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm

WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible

http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm

Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo

http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm

PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole

http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm

PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago

http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm

Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo?

http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm

Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified?

http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm

Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos

http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm

Comment

From Marc Spess

animateclay@suscom.net

4-15-5

Hi Jeff,

I don't know where Jon got the blown up images of the small white jet - there seems to be no verification or info where he got them. Just that he has them, so I'm skeptical. I also want to add that the blow-up image shows what looks like an AWACs aircraft with the distinct round area on top. NATO has an all white AWACS aircraft with barely noticeable markings, you can see a large image of it here:

http://www.seaspotter.com/BFI/Military/AWACS.jpg

The US version is also all white, but has an air force star in the rear quarters. The major difference is it looks like the paint pattern on top is reversed in the blow-up. It doesn't look anything like the Saab 105 at all from what I can tell.

There is also evidence about the AWACS, here is a quote from this page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misinformation_and_
rumors_about_the_September_11,_2001_attacks

"Well, the - I suppose the toughest decision was this question of whether or not we would intercept incoming commercial aircraft. MR. RUSSERT: And you decided? VICE PRES. CHENEY: We decided to do it. We'd, in effect, put a flying combat air patrol up over the city; F-16s with an AWACS, which is an airborne radar system, and tanker support so they could stay up a long time."

My feeling is wherever the blown-up images came from they are not related to what happened in Pennsylvania.

It is also understandable that there would be other aircraft showing up in footage of the WTC since there was a gap before all jets were told to land. It was business as usual in the skies before the government and FAA caught on. The towers are close to JFK and LaGuardia - two major airports in New York. The air traffic pattern is right along side the towers when you land, right past Ellis Island.

Marc

Comment
From Peter W. Beadle

4-20-5

Jeff -

I always try to keep an open mind when I read the articles on your site and sometimes I find some great insight. But once again I have come across a conspiracy theorist article that is just absurd. My office is in Midtown Manhattan facing south. I am on the 36th floor and had an unobstructed view of the first airliner crashing into the North Tower.

I watched the entire flight of the jet down the length of the island after it went roaring right over my own office building. There were no other aircraft in the sky over midtown or downtown Manhattan when the aircraft struck the North Tower. There was no white jet, there was no helicopter anywhere in the vicinity. I can remember every detail of every second of that day [down to the conversation I had on Queens Blvd as I walked home with a guy that would have been in the North Tower if it wasn't for his dentist appointment, and the amazing sight of military fighters refueling over Manhattan after the towers had fallen and I had begun my 3.5 hour walk home], and probably will for my whole life.

These claims by paranoid guys sitting in towns that face no real threat, who believe they have figured it all out drive me crazy. Yes, I understand that they are free to write what they wish, and that there may even be a benefit to having them place their opinions out there for everyone to read and consider, but does any vetting of this material take place? For instance, where are the ATC [air traffic control] transcripts that would show that such aircraft were in the air -- or at least a denial of an appropriate FOIA request?

Where is there actual documented proof that the antenna identified on the helicopter is 1) the type of antenna that would be used with a remote control system and 2) was actually hooked up to a remote control system. All we are provided with is some guy, whose CV is completely unknown and not disclosed, circling a part of the undercarriage of a police helicopter and declaring it was part of a remote control system. What is the efficacy of providing a media outlet to such absurd and ill conceived hyperbole?

Incidentally, that is not an unmarked helicopter we see in the pictures. First it is a poor quality picture of the belly of a helicopter, so it would be hard to see markings in any event. However, it can clearly be seen that the helicopter is painted in the blue and white livery of the NYPD and is of a type of helicopter that is seen almost daily flying over the city. Has the author of the article ever even been to New York?

I have yet to see an article on this site surrounding the events of 9/11 that is carefully reasoned and properly documented. Time and time again I read articles in which the author latches onto some intriguing factoid [usually unsubstantiated], and then using it as a starting point, they begin piecing together an entire theory of how 9/11 was a staged and orchestrated event by anyone from the illuminati to Bush himself.

Half the crowd says the Towers were blown up based on pictures of the structure collapsing[even though if you watched the towers burn then fall like I did, it was obvious that the structural steel melted causing the collapse -- hell my exact words 20 minutes before the collapse of the north tower as I Watched the fire through binoculars spreading DOWNWARDS [think heavy jet fuel] through the building was that the steel was going to melt and the building would collapse -- 20 minutes later it did just that]...the other half are latching onto this remote controlled theory. I was there. I saw it, I lived it, talk to me, visit the city and understand the layout so you understand why you are missing about 50,000 witnesses to the white jet and helicopter theory.

It didn't happen the way these guys are claiming it did. Which then raises the question why are these guys coming up with bullsh-t theories? I suppose in most cases its because they like to hear themselves talk and like to feel important because they figured out what no one else did, but does that explain all of them. If you are looking for a conspiracy, examine the conspiracy theorists for a change.

P. Beadle

Comment
Mr Thurston Cummins
4-24-5

Hello Jeff,

I believe the plane visible in the photo with the date-time stamp of 9/11/2001 09:16 (http://www.rense.com/general64/P0001099.jpg) is in fact a U.S Air force F-15 fighter jet. The light reflection and shadows is indicative of the F-15 shape, with reflection visible in the photo as primarily 3 white areas, one at the front illuminating part of the nose, and 2 at the rear illuminating part of the twin vertical tail fins (a prominent feature of the F-15). The darker areas are the wings and horizontal stabilisers as seen from below. This is illustrated as follows:

For comparison here is a photo of 3 F-15's (1) note the similarity in lighting and shadow effects that accentuate the nose and twin vertical tail fins. With extrapolation of altitude and angle the similarities are apparent.

In addition, the date-time stamp of the photo corresponds with the location of at least one F-15 as corroborated by the following information:

"9:11 A.M. Two F-15's from Otis Air National Guard Base reach New York." (2) and "Both pilots were together, near John F. Kennedy Airport, about 15 miles from the World Trade Center, when the first tower collapsed. Later, Nasty was flying his F-15 about 5,000 feet above the second tower when it, too, folded into a torrent of dust and debris." (3)

Sources (valid as of 17 April 2005)

1 - "F-15 en Formation" (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jeremy.celse/F-15Form.html)

2 - "9/11 Facts Checklist" (http://pages.infinit.net/fmgoyeau/911c04a.html)

3 - "I thought it was the start of World War III" By KEVIN DENNEHY

Cape Cod Times Writer (http://www.poconorecord.com/report/911-2002/000232.htm)

911-Hollywood-like Fake Smoke

Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11 By Jon Carlson carlson.jon@att.net 6-1-5

On Monday, May 23, 2005, FOX affiliate WSVN-TV sent Patrick Fraser, with only a BS in Journalism from UF-Gainsville, to tangle with Scientist Dr. A.K. Dewdney over the 9/11 Pentagon quagmire. Dr. Dewdney: "If we are right the implications are profound." Reporter: "Right or right off the wacko chart, common sense tells you its not likely. In fact common sense tells you its not only outrageous -- its ridiculous and one well known skeptic has another description for it -- laughable." INDEED, 'laughable' describes most of this article. http://www.wsvn.com/features/articles/investigations/DBM1425/ As the pioneer 9/11 researcher Kee Dewdney struck gold when he proved beyond a shadow of doubt that extended cell phone calls from airliners were a fable of the Bush Administration on 9/11. That was the first foot in the doorway to 9/11 Truth. http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=9 As most Americans are unfamilar with using the Scientific Method in solving problems, everyone should pay attention when Kee Dewdney demonstates the use of the Scientific Method in explaining 9/11. BY THE WAY, the Scientific Method completely funks the Fed Govt. 9/11 conspiracy theory. http://www.serendipity.li/wot/operation_pearl.htm Links to Kee's 9/11 research at http://www.algebra.com/algebra/about/history/A._K._Dewdney.wikipedia As an affiliate of FOX network, WSVN-TV should focus on the Hollywood-style Towering Inferos or lack thereof on 9/11. In the RENSE article, Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm Firefighter Russell Dodge said. "There were two vehicles burning, along with a construction trailer - we didn't know at the time, but that trailer was the main producer of smoke on the outside of the building. He said the foam units got there and concentrated on the area of the construction trailer, which was producing some severe fires and subsequent mini explosions due to highly flammable chemicals in it THAN on the actual point of impact from the hijacked aircraft. http://www.mdw.army.mil/news/Belvoir_firefighter_among_first_responders.html The 'construction trailer', actually a large generator trailer with its own 500 gallon diesel tank, was not used but kept for an emergency. As there was no need for the large extra tank nearby, the tank apparently was filled with a crude oil-diesel oil mixture, similar to an orchard smudge pot, and remotely ignited to create the enormous smoke plume . Note that the smoke from the burning trailer is whitish. Witnesses said the aircraft hardly penetrated the brick Pentagon wall before an explosion blew it to bits. Apparently that explosion is caught here. See the RENSE article, Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm Note that the circled area around the generator trailer was also ignited. This photo JUST AFTER the Explosion shows a bonfire in front of the impact area with its smoke plume and the Generator trailer area highlighted with its smoke plume just getting a start. Of course, NO Pentagon section down. This photo shows the generator trailer area producing an enormous smoke plume with the bonfire in front of the impact area about the same as the last photo but a better show for the camera shots sent around the world. Witnesses said they thought explosive charges were set off inside the Pentagon 'impact area' to make it appear that the aircraft actually passed the front wall when it really didn't. That would explain large fire development even outside the impact area. Here the firetruck is directing foam at the large fuel tank only with a minor fire still burning on the generator trailer. Shortly after 9/11, a panel of Boston area-based civil and structural engineers convened at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The main culprits in bringing the famously lofty buildings down, they concluded, were the two intensely hot infernos that erupted when tens of thousands of gallons of aviation fuel spilled from the doomed airliners. http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/sciam/ LIKE the Towering Infero at the South Tower: IN A RARE EPISODE of 9/11 Truth reporting, the NY Times plied loose a tape from the DOJ, FBI Video & Tape Collection claimed held for 'national security' but seemingly held to protect the criminals behind 9/11. "Battalion Seven ... Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines. Radio that, http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/firefighter-tape-excerpts.htm IN MORE 9/11 Truth REPORTING Reporter Tom Flucco interviewed Presidential candidate Karl Schwarz who said "there are about 150 retired and active U.S. military and federal intelligence officers who will come forward and testify regarding government involvement in the September 11 attacks--but only if there is a serious criminal grand jury." Apparently NY AG Spitzer and NYC DA Morgenthau are involved in Obstruction of 9/11 Justice. We have heard reports indicating that the New York federal grand jury in Albany is so displeased with Spitzer and Morgenthau's paucity of action and lack of subpoenas or indictments over 9/11 (given the evidence already handed over) that it has assumed its own independent constitutional and federal authority to take control of the criminal proceedings. No matter how high the federal officials or elected representatives implicated, or which print and electronic media executives committed obstruction of justice to cover up criminal evidence, or which military and government officials supervised the two-hour Air Force stand-down during the attacks, New Yorkers who elected Spitzer and Morgenthau (and all Americans who trust them with their personal safety and protection in their jurisdiction over 9-11 criminal proceedings) have a right to expect the two to proceed full bore with obvious, credible, and prosecutable evidence that the U.S. government played a part in the September 11 attacks. This includes the above Pentagon-related evidence. http://www.tomflocco.com/modules.php?name= News&file=article&sid=110&mode=&order=0&thold=0 The North Tower Smoking Infero didn't originate at the crash area. A victim is circled in the first photo.. This photo shows a SINGLE North Tower floor resembling a smudge pot putting out vast clouds of black, sooty smoke just like at the Pentagon . Certainly a steel structure with 4 inch concrete floors would normally have little combustible material. AS only 17 minutes expired between crashes AND a black smoke plume was required to hide the helicopter operating above the South Tower before, during, and after the South Tower crash, this floor probably contained barrels of crude oil-diesel fuel mixture that was remotely ignited TO ENSURE A HIDING PLACE FOR THE HELICOPTER. Didn't work as cameras galore caught it in action. See the RENSE article On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School for the full story about the need for a smoke plume that also implicates criminals in and out of federal government for 9/11. In 1945, a USAF two-engine B-25 bomber crashed into the 79th floor of the 102-storey Empire State Building in Manhattan. The crash occurred during a misty night, and the damage was restricted to the impact area. When the plane crashed, one of its engines whizzed from the north wall, and through the south wall, ultimately landing on the roof of a nearby building. Debris from the building and plane also severed through elevator cables, and sent two cars and passengers into freefall. "We were horrified to see a B-25 half in and half out of the Empire State Building." http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92525&page=1 The fire caused by the bomber's high-octane fuel was extinguished WITHIN AN HOUR by New York City fireman. www.historychannel.com/speeches/archive/speech_347.html FROM: http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/tradecencrimes/eh_wtc11.jpg Most important of all here is the Karl Schwarz group's plan to reverse the decline of America. http://www.iconoclast-texas.com/default.htm Of course Presidential candidate Karl Schwarz has more hard-hitting 9/11 journalism at www.karlschwarz.com. DON'T MISS: WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm 911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm

911-South Tower Exit Wounds, napalm bomb ??

South Tower Exit Wounds Tell 911 Tale By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net 7-29-5

In the light of the Bush administration attack on Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame for revealing Bush Iraq War lies , it is not surprising that America's British hero of a few short weeks ago, George Galloway, had his District targeted in the London Blasts by al-CIAda. As the bomb was placed underneath the Tube subway car clearly no suicide bomber was involved. http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/news/region_wide/ 2005/07/11/83e33146-09af-4421-b2f4-1779a86926f9.lpf In a apparent tit-for-tat eight British agents then attempted to plant bombs in the Chicago subway. However French Intelligence agents and US Marshals killed four in a firefight with the others ending up in court. Just like the 9/11 Truth the Queen's newspaper, The Chicago Tribune, is not covering the story. On the day after the London blasts the Tribune headlines screamed bloody murder. Also in the following linked article Tom Flocco and Stew Webb have evidence Bush I, Clinton, and a cast of characters were involved with drug dealing, bank fraud, obstruction of 9/11 justice, and you name it: http://www.tomflocco.com/modules.php?name=News&file= article&sid=112&mode=&order=0&thold=0 FOR MATURE AUDIENCES: In a similar vein Kay Griggs gives an insider look at more Federal government crime: "With all that's happening in the world, the time is right now for truth," said Griggs. "I think America can handle the truth now and I basically want people to know that my husband and the people involved with him are really nothing but cowards and bullies. But they are, at the same time, dangerous, evil people that must be stopped. I am not a vindictive person and I also am not seeking publicity. I simply want people to know the truth about how these people are trying to destroy this country." http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/29982.htm In reponse to an email sent to the Adelaide Institute, Australia, on the obvious targeting of George Galloway, Federick Toben claimed that Australian Prime Minister John Howard was in NYC on 9/11. http://www.rense.com/general67/dwlf.htm The Canberra Times claims the visit was supposed to be a secret visit with Rupert Murdoch. http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detailops.asp?class=your+say&opinion_id=98079 Interesting reading as it shows what a sleaze Howard is. Howard came to the US before the Iraq War to tell Americans of the WMD Iraq had pointed at the US even though Aussie Intelligence said no such thing. Insiders claim Howard joined the 'Coalition of the Willing' in exchange for a free trade agreement that was signed this past year. It was such a laughable deal that Aussies were mocking it as is their custom. Howard, of course, claimed it was the Deal of the Century. Australia had its own '9/11' merely to get gun control legislation: The Port Arthur Massacre. Howard's involvement and handling of that incident is similar to how Bush tried to deal with 9/11. Both coverups now coming unglued. http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/print.asp?ID=180 The OKC bombing coverup also is coming unglued. Attorney Jesse Trentadue has uncovered incriminating evidence: If his suspicion about the informant's identity is correct, "then not only does it appear that FBI defendants knew about and fail[ed] to prevent the attack upon the Murrah Building, but FBI defendants may also have been responsible for training McVeigh and the others who planned and carried out the attack," Trentadue says in a document filed Monday at U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City. http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread155172/pg1 Background of the OKC investigation by the McCurtain Daily Gazette: http://www.mccurtain.com/okc_bombing Former DOJ officials claim OKC Bombing coverup began in D.C. http://www.mccurtain.com/articles/2005/07/15/top_story/news001.txt SHOWTIME From studying the exit wounds of JFK, the government conspiracy theory that he was killed by a patsy, Oswald, and not some CIA agents in sympathy with Cuban right-wingers was demolished. It is crystal-clear that the Boeing 737, not a 767 the Fed Govt. claims, approaching the South Tower has shiny objects attached. The underneath view in the CBC video shows objects on both sides. http://www.rbnlive.com/candidate.html A napalm bomb has a shiny surface that reflects the sun. This bomb weighs 750 pounds and carries 100 gallons of napalm. FROM: http://www.ordtec.com/IncBombs.html The Queen's newspaper didn't carry photos of the New Yorkers that were victimized and then crushed in tons of concrete in controlled demolitions. This photo is only a hint of the injuries they faced: The EXIT WOUNDS as seen in the the best 9/11 video, the Naudets '9/11' (www.Amazon.com): The EXIT WOUNDS as seen in the CBC video: The CBC video catches the bomb coming through the left opening (Note the shadow.): A split second later a flaming 737 engine blasts through the wall making the opening on the right and landing in the street. In the RENSE articles, Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm AND The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm are several photos of the street engine. In the RENSE article, CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm the CBC video catches the bomb exploding. As corroboration view a photo sequence from a second video shot by PAX-TV and viewed on CNN: . Just as the bomb is exploding the WHITE JET flies by making a shadow on the North Tower. For the lowdown on the WHITE JET, see the RENSE article, NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet. http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm This photo shows napalm as used in Iraq. THE FINAL NAIL IN THE COFFIN: In 1984: NASA outfitted an airliner with remote control in order to test a fuel additive's effect on exploding jet fuel. Note the yellowish color of exploding jet fuel compared to the reddish color of exploding napalm: FROM: http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/gallery/photo/CID/index.html HOPE FOR AMERICA 2008 Presidential Candidate Karl Schwarz has formulated a Plan, The American Patriot Movement, for America and the World to bring back fiscal responsibility and respect to the United States and bring Justice to victims of 9/11, the OKC bombing, and the Middle East wars. http://www.karlschwarz2008.com Find the brilliant Party Platform at: http://www.karlschwarz2008.com/platform.htm All religious faiths will cheer that the platform clamps down on the unAmerican acts of Israel and America. Please register to vote. Help save America by making online contributions at the website. DON'T MISS: Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm Bush Responds To 911 Fireworks http://www.rense.com/general66/ressp.htm Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm 911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm

911-Witnesses To WTC Explosives

More Proof 911 Inside Job - Witnesses To WTC Explosives GeorgeWashingtonblogspot.com 11-10-5

During the afternoon of 9/11, the Mayor of New York city and the Governor of New York state held a press conference. Reporters asked 2 interesting questions: "Is there anything to indicate that there could be MORE BOMBS, more planes out there?" "So, the only National Guard we'll see will be in lower Manhattan, in the BOMB site area?" Neither the Mayor nor the Governor corrected the reporters by stating that there weren't any bombs, and that -- instead -- the twin towers had collapsed due solely to airplane and fire damage. If you were a high-level official trying to calm down the public in a major crisis (which is part of the job description) and there weren't in fact bombs in t he world trade centers, wouldn't you have corrected the reporters in order to kill unfounded rumors and minimize panic? Doesn't this lack of a statement amount to an acknowledgment that the Mayor and Governor believed there were bombs in the twin towers? By way of analogy, imagine that 10 witnesses say they saw Mike shoot Joe. In a press conference, a reporter asks the police chief if police know why Mike shot Joe, and the chief answers without correcting the reporter. In other words, the police chief does not answer by saying something like "No no, Fred shot Joe" or "we don't know who shot Joe yet, we've just started investigating". Isn't that further circumstantial evidence that tends to show that Mike shot Joe? Doesn't the silence in the face of bomb-related questions help corroborate the numerous eyewitness statements of bombs in the trade centers, such as the following: A reporter for USA Today stated that the FBI believed that bombs i n the buildings brought the buildings down; The NY Fire Department Chief of Safety stated there were "bombs" and "secondary devices", which caused the explosions in the buildings; A NYC firefighters who witnessed attacks stated that it looked like there were bombs in the buildings; A NYC firefighter stated "On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there was bombs set in the building"; An MSNBC reporter stated that police had found a suspicious device "and they fear it could be something that might lead to another explosion" and the police officials believe "that one of the explosions at the world trade center . . . may have been caused by a van that was parked in the building that may have had some kind of explosive device in it, so their fear is that there may have been explosive devices planted either in the building or in the adjacent area"; A NYC firefighter stated "the south tower . . . exploded . . . At that point a debate began to rag e because the perception was that the building looked like it had been taken out with charges . . . many people had felt that possibly explosives had taken out 2 World Trade"; Assistant Fire Commissioner stated "I thought . . . before . . . No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. . . . I . . . saw a flash flash flash . . . [at] the lower level of the building [not up where the fire was]. You know like when they . . . blow up a building ... ?" -- and a lieutenant firefighter the Commisioner spoke with independently verified the flashes; A firefighter said "[T]here was just an explosion. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions"; Another firefigther stated "it almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight"; A paramedic said "at first I thought it was -- do you ever see professional demolition where they se t the charges on certain floors and then you hear pop pop pop pop pop -- thats exactly what because thought it was"; A police officer noted "People were saying, 'There's another one and another one.' I heard reports of secondary bomb explosions ..."; A firefighter stated "there was an explosion in the south tower, which . . . just blew out in flames . . . One floor under another after another and when it hit about the fifth floor, I figured it was a bomb, because it looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing. I was there in '93" (referring to 1993 bombing of world trade center; A firefighter stated "it looked like sparkling around one specific layer of the building . . . Then the building started to come down. My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV"; Dan Rather said that collapse was "reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen [when] a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down" (CNN's Aaron Brown and a Fox News reporter also made similar comments); A British newspaper stated "some eyewitnesses reported hearing another explosion just before the structure crumbled. Police said that it looked almost like a 'planned implosion'"; One ABC reporter stated it looked like a controlled demolition; another ABC reporter stated "anyone who has ever watched a building being demolished on purpose knows that if you're going to do this you have to get at the under-infrastructure of the building to bring it down"; A reporter for WNYC radio said "The reporters were trying to figure out what had happened. We were thinking bombs had brought the buildings down"; A Wall Street Journal reporter said "I heard this metallic roar, looked up and saw what I thought was just a peculiar site of individual floors, one after the other exploding outward. I thought to myself, "My God, they're going to bring the build ing down." And they, whoever they are, HAD SET CHARGES . . . . I saw the explosions"; and A facilities manager in the north tower "was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons". You can view links to the source materials for all eyewitness quotes at www.911Proof.com . The 9/11 Commission Report did not even once mention the word "explosion" or "bomb". The mainstream media hasn't touched the evidence of bombs in the trade center. Democratic and republican politicans smear anyone who even raises the issue as a conspiracy nut. Isn't it time that we faced the elephant in the living room? Can our democracy survive if we don't?

911-The helicopter over South Tower

Professor Jones Teaches Tucker About 911 By Jon Carlson carlson.jon@att.net 11-19-5

On Monday, 11/14/05, Tucker Carlson welcomed Brigham Young University Professor Steven Jones to the 'Situation.' Steven Jones, a professor of physics, believes that the hijackers may not have brought down the towers by themselves (Actually he said Moslems didn't do the WTC demolitions). http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10053445/ Tucker explained: (For)The two towers (collapse). The explanation has been that the fire inside was so intense that it weakened the structural steel and that each floor collapsed down upon the next in a pancake fashion, and they imploded in on themselves. That's essentially, I think, what people think. This photo shows the 'reported' South Tower 'Towering Inferno" on the left shortly after the impact: Prof Jones: (One hypothesis, or possibility, is FIRE caused the collapse while) The other (hypothesis) is that EXPLOSIVES in the buildings may have caused the collapse. And so, then we analyze and see which fits the data better, and I've done that in my 25-page paper. Paper LINK: http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html Prof Jones wanted a video of the WTC7 collapse shown that he had sent Tucker but THAT VIDEO was too hot to handle. 'Commander-in-chief' Bush approval ratings, now sinking through the 30's would drop off the scale! Another Jones, Alex, interviewed attorney Stanley Hilton about court documents that Bush ordered 9/11: http://www.prisonplanet.com/jones_report_031403_hilton.html Tucker thought a fuel tank was the cause. However, Prof Jones pointed out as seen in this photo the KINK characteristic of a building demolition: Prof Jones concludes: ...all scientists now reasonably agree that the fires were not sufficiently hot to melt the steel, so what is this (Ground Zero) molten metal? It's direct evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives, such as thermite, which produces molten iron as an end product. These LIDAR Images show the hot spots in the DEBRIS PILES, not the ground itself As WTC7 was a conventional demolition job NO hot spots surround it. WTC1 (North Tower) and WTC2 (South Tower) are a considerable distance (300 feet) away from WTC7 implying no connection to the WTC1 and WTC2 demolitions and thus the WTC7 demolition was a separate event. FROM: http://web.gc.cuny.edu/ees/october2001.pdf OBVIOUSLY Tucker failed the Professor's tests showing poor preparation but so would many Americans. Tucker concludes: Professor, we are going to have to leave it to our viewers who are interested enough to follow up to do just that. We appreciate you coming on, even if I don't understand your theories, we appreciate you trying to explain them. Thanks. Just so Tucker is better prepared for the next Prof Jones interview, video captures from the NBC 9/11 archive should be studied. With 17 minutes between crashes NBC must have had Intel that 9/11 was coming down to position a news helicopter in the WTC airspace in that 17 minute window. This photo shows the South Tower crash: This photo shows the military helicopter that remote controlled the Boeing 737 into the South Tower. It could only wait 59 minutes as fuel was running low before setting off the cutter charges that demolished the South Tower: In this photo the hollowed out area left of the TV mast may have been caused by the propwash of the military helicopter: This photo was also shot from the NBC helicopter. Note the military helicopter to the right Another NBC photo of the military helicopter killing time just after the South Tower crash: This photo shows the military helicopter above the smoke plume to the left: For those who would like a close-up view of the Bell212 military helicopter:: This photo shows the military helicopter finishing its mission and heading for the aircraft carrier, USS George Washington anchored off Long Island: Tucker is an avid fisherman. For those moments when the fish aren't biting he is assigned for homework the RENSE article, German Intel Agent von Bulow Solves 9/11: http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm When their country called Tucker and Prof Jones stood up and were counted while the NY Times and the Democrats hide in the bushes and cover for the Bushes. Please email Tucker at Tucker@msnbc.com and congratulate him for bringing 9/11 Truth to Americans. 2008 Presidential Candidate Karl Schwarz also has some lessons for Americans: htm http://www.rense.com/general68/lib.htm http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm DON'T MISS more 9/11 analysis and photos that the NY Times finds NOT fit to print: German Intel Agent Von Bulow Solves 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm Positive ID: The 9/11 South Tower Airliner 'PODS' http://www.rense.com/general68/poss911.htm FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact http://www.rense.com/general67/fbicl.htm 9/11 Flight 93 Passengers 'Lost' http://www.rense.com/general67/911pass.htm The 9/11 Pentagon Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm The 911 North Tower Demolition Explained http://www.rense.com/general67/9118.htm The Rest Of The 911 Flight 93 Story http://www.rense.com/general67/rest911.htm South Tower Exit Wounds Tell 9/11 Tale http://www.rense.com/general67/911uu.htm Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm Bush Responds To 911 Fireworks http://www.rense.com/general66/ressp.htm Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm 911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm

Boeing 737 at Pentagon ??

FBI Hides 85 Pentagon Videos And 9/11 Truth
By Jon Carlson
carlson.jon@att.net 12-29-5 The Karl Schwarz group has found that the US plans for what has come to be known as 9/11 because of its date and its aftermath of ongoing wars originated in the Clinton Administration. Gore, Kerry, Clintons, Kennedy, Liberman et al join with the NY Times to hide the 9/11 photos and analysis: http://rense.com/general69/thethreereasons.htm Not surprisingly the Pentagon Reconstruction was also started during that Administration (1997). A portion was specially reinforced to take a airliner hit and 'just happened' to have had few workers in that area on 9/11: http://www.ftmeade.army.mil/SoundOFF/archives /SO2002/May02/html/05-02News-pentagon.htm On 9/10 curiously it was announced that $2.3 Trillion in Pentagon funds was MIA: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/01/29/eveningnews/main325985.shtml and http://www.rense.com/general69/depart.htm Patriots Bronco Bingham and attorney Scott Hodes continue their battle with the FBI to pry loose the 85 videos from the security cameras galore in the Pentagon vicinity: http://www.flight77.info/00new/85reply.jpg Find the Appeal of the FBI Denial: http://www.flight77.info/00new/appeal2.jpg http://www.flight77.info/ Previously an engine was identified from debris in front of the Pentagon as a JT8D. This engine powered early versions of the Boeing 737-100 and 737-200 airliners and could have been installed on latter versions: Read the RENSE article, Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified, http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm that compared the found engine with an Boeing 727 JT8D engine on display at the Museum of Science & Industry in Chicago. As engine parts are made of heavy steel alloys several were found and identified at the Pentagon. This is a damaged fan hub assembly from a JT8D: This cherry JT8D fan hub assembly is a dead ringer: The heaviest body part found at the Pentagon was a half ton landing gear main support. It also is a dead ringer for the main support of this Boeing 737 landing gear: Former USMC aviator Terry Morin working as a contractor at the BMDO offices at the old Navy Annex identified the airliner as a Boeing 737: "The plane had a silver body with red and blue stripes down the fuselage. I believed at the time that it belonged to American Airlines, but I couldn't be sure. It looked like a 737 and I so reported to authorities." http://www.coping.org/911/survivor/pentagon.htm This graphic discussing the large number of surplus Boeing 737's circa 9/11 suggests the weapons of choice on 9/11 probably were sold at bargain basement prices: Sibel Edmonds, FBI whistleblower, discovered the can of worms that financed 9/11 but has been gagged by Bush who ordered 9/11 carried out by the CIA and the US Navy: http://www.justacitizen.com/ Gary Potter reports on that can of worms in his article, Organized Crime, The CIA and the Savings and Loan Scandal: http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/CIA/S&L_Scandal_CIA.html In 2000 the 2 biggest sources of opium were Burma and Afghanistan. However in 2000 the victorious Taliban decided to destroy the opium poppy crop (notwithstanding its considerable financial importance) and before the US invasion in 2001 it had been virtually all destroyed. However the US victory meant that by 2002 Afghanistan under US guns had regained its previous important position as a major World opium producer: http://www.rense.com/general68/fab.htm The FBI has a flock of 9/11 Boeing 737 engines stashed away in 'investigative files': Two from the Pentagon, one from the alleged Flight 93 crash, and this CFM56 engine identified on a NYC street after the South Tower crash: The Power Hour radio show has confirmed our research that the NYC street engine from the South Tower crash was a CFM56 from a Boeing 737 and that Flight 175, a Boeing 767, did not hit the South Tower: http://www.rense.com/general69/175.htm In addition, the Power Hour has found that Pentagon 9/11 'witnesses' were given prepared written statements to say that a commercial airliner hit the Pentagon" when in fact they had no knowledge of the fact or knew it was false. They interviewed a former Pentagon insider working there on 9/11 who presented damaging evidence that the military brass lied about what type of aircraft actually struck the Pentagon. Reporter Greg Szymanski concluded that by following orders from the Pentagon brass, Pentagon worker Flowers provides even more evidence that the government was involved in causing 9/11 and the resulting deaths of more than 3,000 people. http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/39024.htm The Power Hour has requested identification of the object hidden under a tarp, the start of the 'coverup' of 9/11 Pentagon activity, but light enough to be carried by Pentagon staff so clearly it wasn't a heavy Boeing 767 wing. Of course if it was there would be no need to cover it up just like the 85 Pentagon videos: The Sugano Experiment showed what happens to the wings of an aluminum aircraft striking a masonry barrier similar to the Pentagon foot and a half thick masonry walls. Remember the Pentagon walls were specially reinforced in anticipation of 9/11. Finding the wings and engine in front of the Pentagon is proof positive that the aircraft hit the thick masonry wall and collapsed not entering the Pentagon. It carried explosive charges that blew it to bits shortly after impact. The bits rained down for blocks around. This is what the FBI knows the 85 videos will show along with the aircraft being a Boeing 737 and not a Boeing 757, the aircraft of alleged Flight 77. So where is Barbara Olson today? FROM: http://www.sandia.gov/news-center/video-gallery/index.html NO NEED to tell RENSE readers that the Pentagon staff is covering up a Boeing 737 wing. Hat's off to premier 9/11 librarian and whistleblower Web Fairy's article, 150+ 9/11 Smoking Guns Found in the Mainstream Media: http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html Note the paucity of NYTimes links as they continue their coverup of the Federal Government mass murder of 3000 of their subscribers. Jessie of www.tvnewslies.com who carries the RENSE 9/11 articles has a response: Hey NY Times: Go to Hell You Criminal Bastards!: http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=171 For different slants on the Pentagon 9/11 story: 1) http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/citizen_grand_jury.html Top-notch reporter Chris Bollyn, Web Fairy, Sherman Skolnick, Greg Szymanski, Phil Jayhan, and myself all from Chicago. We model our work after Sherman Skolnick who still leads the way on 9/11. 2) http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ppfinal.html Web Fairy said this site was promoting the photo of a piece of metal (see link) circa 9/11 to many Internet sites as the 'proof' that Flight 77 actually hit the Pentagon. It doesn't fit anywhere on a Boeing 757. Many analysts have tried. For homework, RENSE readers can try to fit it on a Boeing 737. However, American Airlines has NO Boeing 737 aircraft in their livery. Apparently the Boeing 737 that struck the Pentagon had a brand-new AA paintjob just for 9/11! DON'T MISS more 9/11 analysis and photos that the NY Times finds NOT fit to print: (www.archive.org and Google have articles from broken links.) The 911 North Tower Air Show http://www.rense.com/general69/911hh.htm Professor Jones Teaches Tucker About 911 http://www.rense.com/general68/911nul.htm German Intel Agent Von Bulow Solves 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general68/911jh.htm Positive ID: The 9/11 South Tower Airliner 'PODS' http://www.rense.com/general68/poss911.htm FBI Claims 84 Videos Show NO Flight 77 Impact http://www.rense.com/general67/fbicl.htm 9/11 Flight 93 Passengers 'Lost' http://www.rense.com/general67/911pass.htm The 9/11 Pentagon Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general67/911eng.htm The 911 North Tower Demolition Explained http://www.rense.com/general67/9118.htm The Rest Of The 911 Flight 93 Story http://www.rense.com/general67/rest911.htm South Tower Exit Wounds Tell 9/11 Tale http://www.rense.com/general67/911uu.htm Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed http://www.rense.com/general66/dirt.htm Bush Responds To 911 Fireworks http://www.rense.com/general66/ressp.htm Hollywood-like Fake Smoke Made 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911mir.htm WTC 7 Smoke & Mirrors On 9/11 http://www.rense.com/general65/911m.htm CBC 9/11 Video Secrets Revealed http://www.rense.com/general65/911b.htm 911 CNN Reports Boeing 737s Struck WTC http://www.rense.com/general65/911h.htm Sneak Preview - 911 Pentagon Tapes http://www.rense.com/general64/911et.htm The Rest Of The 9/11 Street Engine Story http://www.rense.com/general64/wth.htm NYC Photos, Flight 93 Witnesses Identify 9/11 White Jet http://www.rense.com/general64/white.htm On 9/11 An Ill Wind Blew to Booker School http://www.rense.com/general63/wte.htm WTC Jet Engine Confirmed NOT From Boeing 767 http://www.rense.com/general63/wtcc.htm Second 911 Remote Control Antenna Verified http://www.rense.com/general63/secnd.htm Avionics Expert-A 911 Remote Control Lesson for PM http://www.rense.com/general63/remo.htm WTC Cutter Charges Clearly Visible http://www.rense.com/general63/cutt.htm Real 911 Science For PM - The ST Airliner Photo http://www.rense.com/general63/st.htm PM Claims Landing Gear Made Pentagon 12 Foot Hole http://www.rense.com/general63/pmm.htm PM Missed NASA 911-type Airliner Crash 20 Years Ago http://www.rense.com/general63/pm.htm Is Popular Mechanics Hiding 911 NYC Engine In Street Photo? http://www.rense.com/general63/hiding.htm Missing Pentagon Jet Engine Identified? http://www.rense.com/general63/ident.htm Missing Pentagon Unobstructed Citgo Videos http://www.rense.com/general63/unob.htm