14. The faked Gemini missions and the faked "moon probes"
The faked Gemini flights since Gemini 6A according to landing data - faked "moon fotos" of the "moon probes" Surveyor
Gemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the alleged rendezvous performance structures of the hall can be clearly seen.
by Michael Palomino (2006)
from: Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space]; Knaur 2006
The development of the atmosphere crafts "Gemini"
One can see that "SU" "Vostok" atmosphere craft was much bigger than "US" "Mercury", and "US" "Gemini" is about as big as "SU" "Vostok".
 Scheme with the comparison of Vostok, Mercury and Gemini atmosphere crafts |
The impossible landing data from the Gemini missions since Gemini 6A
NASA claims that Gemini missions had been circling around the earth. But according to the landing data of the landing capsules all Gemini missions since Gemini 6A are a fake because the landings since Gemini 6A are much too precise to be real landings from an Earth orbit. Real landings from an Earth orbit mostly have an aberration of 100s up to 1,000s of km also in a very precise working team, and a precise landing can be only a lucky chance. But the Gemini flights since Gemini 6A are regularly this precise that they can only be explained by airdrops as it was made in training 1,000s of times.
(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle; Pomeroy 2002; Wisnewski, p.237-243).
[Add to this the "USA" wanted to be brilliant against the "SU" with "precise landings", and the media never want to have recognized the manipulations...]
| Gemini landing data | ||
| Date of landing | Atmosphere ship landed | Aberration from the foreseen landing point |
| 16 Feb 1965 / 2-16-1965 | Gemini 6A | 12.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 18 Dec1965 / 12-18-1965 | Gemini 7 | 11.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 17 March 1966 / 3-17-1966 | Gemini 8 | 2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 6 June 1966 / 6-6-1966 | Gemini 9A | 0.7 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 21 July 1966 / 7-21-1966 | Gemini 10 | 6.2 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 15 Sep 1966 / 9-15-1966 | Gemini 11 | 4.9 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| 15 Nov 1966 / 11-15-1966 | Gemini 12 | 4.8 kmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Landing data from: http://en.wikipedia.com: Splashdown, August 2006
| Fotos from the "US" NASA propaganda from Gemini 6A up to Gemini 12 | |||
| Gemini 6A and 7 foto no.S65-63189: In the alleged rendezvous performance structures of the hall can be clearly seen. |  Gemini 7, foto no.S65-63194: The foto of Gemini 7 of an Earth orbit is as lie. | ||
 Splashdown of Gemini 9A, foto no. 66C-5085. With only 0.7 km aberration from the planned landing point also this flight is a lie. |  Splashdown of Gemini 10 foto no. 66C-6532: According to the landing data with an aberration of 6.2 km from the planned landing point also this flight is a lie as all other flights since Gemini 6A. |  Gemini-Titan 11, foto no.66PC-0261: Alleged start of the rocket. |  Gemini 12 foto no. 66C-9516: Splashdown, and also this flight according to the landing data with an aberration of only 4.8 km from the planned landing point is a lie. |
 Gemini Mission Control Center, foto no. S65-28660: This is a control center without any idea... | At the same time the Control Center is never asked why the landings from an Earth orbit shall have been all this precise. But in fact the Control Center is not a Control Center but an alibi institution of the manipulators of the simulation centers at Langley and Houston. The control center has no idea and the control is guided from somewhere else. |
It's not strange that the CIA headquarters are situated at the same place as one of the simulation centers: at Langley...
Faked moon fotos from faked "moon probes" "Surveyor"
Surveyor 1: Alleged "moon landing" 30 May 1966 / 5-30-1966
Surveyor 2: Alleged "moon landing" 17 April 1967 / 4-17-1967
Surveyor 3: Alleged "moon landing" 8 Sep 1967 / 9-8-1967
Surveyor 4: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Nov 1967 / 11-7-1967
Surveyor 5: Alleged "moon landing" 7 Jan 1968 / 1-7-1968
All in all the Surveyor moon probes shall have transmitted over 85,000 fotos from the moon over a distance of 380,000 km to the Earth (Wisnewski, p.216).
But only considering the radio transmitting connection over this distance through the radioactive belts seems impossible. And NASA historian James R. Hansen reveals in his book "Spaceflight Revolution" the fraud directly unmasking alleged foto of surveyor as pictures from the moon simulation device "LOLA". The alleged first foto of an "Earth rise" (foto no. I-102H2) is in reality the foto L-66-6399.66 ("L" stands for Langley, the simulation center near Hampton in Virginia).
(Wisnewski, p.286-288).
[So there is the question if also all other "moon probes" are a fake, also these of the "Soviet Union". Because a radio transmitting connection of over 380,000 km seems absolutely doubtful and is also non controllable...].
But artificial moon surfaces are very real, according to NASA historian Hanson. Moon surfaces can be easily imitated,
(In: Hansen, James R.: Spaceflight Revolution, SP-4308, p.375; Internet edition, http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; Wisnewski, p.284-285)
and artificial moon surfaces can also be published on fotos very well and in fuzzy films as a "real moon surface". And the stupid media believe all, to rise their numbers of copies...
The money is in power - the truth is loosing...
No comments:
Post a Comment