MH370 = Whatever goes up must come down

Whatever goes up must come down

Created on 30 March 2014 Written by Andrew MacGregor

In regard to the ‘missing’ Malaysian Airlines’ flight MH 370, there are only two possibilities.  Either this particular aeroplane did take off from K. L. and subsequently crashed, or it didn’t.  If this aeroplane didn’t take off, then everything about it is and was an elaborate hoax.  Thus the pertinent question is not ‘did Flight MH 370 take off’, but rather was there a sighting of an aeroplane coming down or crashing within the time frame and the possible distance from where this aeroplane was lasted placed?  The answer is ‘Yes’!
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54062
Residents of the remote Maldives island of Kuda Huvadhoo in Dhaal Atoll have reported seeing a "low flying jumbo jet" on the morning of the disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.

Whilst the disappearance of the Boeing 777 jet, carrying 239 passengers has left the whole world in bewilderment, several residents of Kuda Huvadhoo told Haveeru on Tuesday that they saw a "low flying jumbo jet" at around 6:15am on March 8.

They said that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it – which is what the Malaysia Airlines flights typically look like.

Was there any corroboration to support this sighting?  ‘Yes’!

http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54178

The unknown object found in Baarah in Haa Alif Atoll of the Maldives is "very likely" to be a fire suppression bottle from an aircraft, local aviation experts said on Wednesday.

Residents of the island have assumed the object, which was found washed up at the beach on Monday, to be bomb or sea mine, but the Maldives National Defence Force (MNDF) on Wednesday said it was not an explosive device. But the army did not specify the nature of the object.

An experienced local aircraft engineer, who wished to remain anonymous, told Haveeru that the object is "very likely" to be a fire suppression bottle from an aircraft.

"But I'll have to see it in person and cross check the part number on it. Then only I'll be able to say which type of aircraft it belongs to," the aircraft engineer said.

Two other aircraft engineers and a Maldivian pilot working at a foreign airline also said that the object was "likely" a fire suppression bottle from an aircraft. However, they also decline to arrive at a conclusion unless they see the object in person.

The news of the unidentified object, believed to be a fire suppression bottle from an aircraft, comes about a week after several residents of Kuda Huvadhoo in Dhaal Atoll claimed to have seen a "low flying jumbo jet" at around 6:15am on March 8 – the day of the disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370.

The reported sighting of the missing aircraft over the Maldives led to a probe by Maldives police. But both the MNDF and Malaysian authorities have denied the reported sighting.

From http://aae-ltd.com/about-2/components/

Extinguisher Bottle & Suppression Rack Assembly

One of the earliest reports was of a New Zealander in the middle of the Indian Ocean witnessed a ‘fireball’ falling out of the sky.  For some unknown reason this possibility has been totally ignored and the story removed from view.  ‘WHY’? 
It can be stated that the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 was sighted in the Maldives at 6.15am local time by several witnesses, but these sightings have been ignored.  ‘Why’?
What is interesting is that the discovered fire suppression bottle would not have floated like flotsam if it had still contained its fire suppression ingredients.  In other words this bottle was devoid of fire suppression ingredients because it had been activated by a fire in the cargo hold which is where these bottles are placed.
What was also extremely important were the various ‘stories’ that emanated from the Malaysian Airlines themselves.  The first of these stories was about ‘two stolen passports’.

The two stolen passports

The story emanated from the Malaysian authorities that two passengers boarding ‘Flight MH370’ had used ‘stolen’ passports, one an Italian passport the other an Austrian passport, both stolen in Thailand.  However, the initial report also stated that there was a possibility of another two passports that may not have been genuine.  In other words there was now a possibility of a four man squad being on board flight MH370.

Within days the ‘two passengers’ had been checked via CCTV and identified.  One of the men travelling on a stolen passport has been identified as a 19-year-old Iranian migrant. The Malaysian authorities said that Pouria Nour Mohammad Mehrdad was trying to migrate to Germany and is not thought to be a terrorist.   Delavar Seyed Mohammad Reza was also booked from Kuala Lumpur through Beijing to Amsterdam, and then onto Copenhagen, reports said.

These two ‘suspects’ were identified as Iranians, and arose the possibility that the ‘two Iranian terrorists’ had hijacked ‘Flight 370’.  To demonstrate the absurdity of this possibility is to question why Iranian ‘terrorists’ would use ‘stolen’ passports which would make them easily identifiable via the information at Interpol? 
There is also the modus operandi of the Mossad as being the only ‘Intelligence’ agency to use ‘stolen’ passports as in the case of the murder of the ‘Hamas Terrorist’, Maḥmūd al-Mabḥūḥ; on the 19^th January 2010.
The identification of the two supposed ‘Iranian terrorists’ within twenty four hours was accomplished when ‘friends’ of the two Iranians identified them and gave the explanation that they were trying to reach Europe.
The second man on the left is Pouria [Nour Mohammad Mehrdad], who used the stolen Austrian passport. The man on the far right, [Delavar Seyed Mohammad] Reza, used the stolen Italian passport.:http://backchannel.al-monitor.com/index.php/2014/03/7881/terror-link-not-suspected-as-iranians-using-stolen-passports-identified/#ixzz2xOlcy2Fm
So what we originally had were not ‘two’ but possibly ‘four’ Arab Terrorists armed with stolen passports, hi-jacking a commercial airliner being extremely reminiscent of 911.  I would doubt if this was a coincidence.  The pertinent fact here is that these ‘Arab’ terrorists had been named as ‘Iranians’.
This of course now opens a whole new dilemma in regard to exactly how these two Iranians obtained their ‘stolen’ passports, especially considering that they had travelled to Malaysia on their proper passports, which could indicate that they obtained the stolen passports in Malaysia, not in Thailand, so who then obtained the passports for them and who booked them on flight MH370 which went to Beijing, when their final destination was to be Europe?  Why didn’t they take the straighter route to Europe?  So who set these Iranians up?
The last point in regard to passports was that the Australian television media aired a program in February 2014, to demonstrate exactly how easy it was to obtain a ‘forged passport’ in Thailand; passports the reporter stated were almost perfect!  Were Australians being set-up to accept the story of ‘terrorists’ hijacking MH370 using ‘stolen passports’ in February 2014?

The hijacking of flight MH370
The presence of two ‘Iranian’ terrorists indicate that flight MH370 is to be ‘hijacked’.  The problem of hijacking flight MH370 is that normally passengers are not permitted to enter the cockpit of an aircraft whilst in flight.  However, the 1^st Officer Fariq Ab Hamidhas priors for permitting passengers into the cockpit as per the story put out by an extremely attractive young female, Jonti Roos of herself with a friend posing with the 1^st Officer in the cockpit on a flight from Thailand to Malaysia back in 2011.  Jonti Roos in 2011 resided in South Africa, but in 2014 she is residing in Melbourne, Australia.
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-cockpit-companions/
This creates a further problem.  If the ‘Iranian’ terrorists were going to hijack this particular aircraft due to the behaviour of the 1^st Officer, then it had to be due to the fact that they were aware of the 1^st Officer Fariq Ab Hamid’s behaviour.  Literally, Jonti Roos would have had to report back to the ‘Iranian’ Intelligence what she had done and how she managed to breach the security area of the aircraft.  In other words, the behaviour by the pilot and 1^st Officer has to be condoned, by the Airline Company, because if it was viewed as a ‘breach of security’ then any crew member would report such behaviour.
There is one other problem; that being that this behaviour occurred during daylight flights.  Night-time flights are a completely different matter altogether.  On any night flight, the cabin crew initially get the passengers comfortable and supply them with a light meal and refreshments.  The cabin crew then prepare the passengers to have a sleep.  They have all the shutters drawn, and lights dimmed.  The passengers are given a light blanket and a small headrest.  Thus when the passengers are in a settled condition, if any passenger gets out of their seat, a crew member requests that passenger to return to their seat so as not to disturb the other passengers.  Thus, like good shepherds, the cabin crew watch over their ‘flock’.  There will be no chance of any ‘terrorist’, armed or unarmed to gain access to the cockpit without raising the alarm and causing an alert to be issued.
Meanwhile in the cockpit, the pilot, 1^st Officer and any other crew members attend to their duties.  The main area of work in flying an aircraft are in the areas of taking off and landing.  With the take off from the airport at K L, the pilot and 1^st Officer take the plane to its designated height, via a preplanned route.  Once at their correct height and direction, the major work is over and the pilot initiates ‘George’ the automatic pilot, and then both officers can relax and simply observe the various instruments.  It is at this time that the pilot also says ‘Good night and goodbye’ to the Malaysian Air Traffic Controller.   

The takeover of flight MH370
At 0041 hours Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 departs from K L International Airport.  At 0107 hours, the last ACARS transmission from MH370 is received.  At 0119 the Malaysian Air Traffic Control receive the last verbal contact with MH370.  At 0215 Military radar lose contact with MH370.  At 0615 hours, flight MH370 is sighted over the Maldives. The question now is; “Who has hi-jacked MH370?”

From a John Croft article in Flight Global: In 2006, Boeing announced the following,

“Boeing last week received a US patent for a system that, once activated, removes all controls from pilots to automatically return a commercial airliner to a predetermined landing location.

The "uninterruptible" autopilot would be activated - either by pilots, by onboard sensors or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.

Boeing says: "We are constantly studying ways we can enhance the safety, security and efficiency of the world's airline fleet.”

So flight MH370, which has not issued any alarm, has not deviated from its proper flight path has had its transponder turned off at 0107 hours, and all contact with this aircraft has been lost by 0215 hours.  There are only two possibilities for this action; either the pilot of MH370 or a ‘government agency like the CIA’.
We now know that neither the pilot nor his 1^st Officer have activated this device as we are told that; ‘once activated, (this system) removes all controls from pilots’.  In other words, the events that occurred within flight MH370 could only have been activated by ‘government agencies like the CIA’.  

Malaysian Airforce stood down reminiscent of 911

“A British Royal Air Force base in the colonial era, the Malaysian air force base at Butterworth sits on the mainland across from the island of Penang at the northern reaches of the Strait of Malacca. There, in the early morning hours of March 8, the four-person crew watching for intrusions into the country’s airspace either did not notice or failed to report a blip on their defensive radar and air traffic radar that was moving steadily across the country from east to west, heading right toward them, said the person with knowledge of the matter.

Neither that team nor the crews at two other radar installations at Kota Bharu, closer to where the airliner last had contact with the ground, designated the blip as an unknown intruder warranting attention, the person said. The aircraft proceeded to fly across the country and out to sea without anyone on watch telling a superior and alerting the national defense command near Kuala Lumpur, even though the radar contact’s flight path did not correspond to any filed flight plan.

As a result, combat aircraft never scrambled to investigate. The plane, identified at the time by Mr. Najib as Flight 370, passed directly over Penang, a largely urban state with more than 1.6 million people, then turned and headed out over the Strait of Malacca.”

Malaysian Airforce knew and did nothing

“The existence of the radar contact was discovered only when military officials began reviewing tapes later in the morning on March 8, after the passenger jet failed to arrive in Beijing. It was already becoming clear that morning, only hours after the unauthorized flyover, that something had gone very wrong. Tapes from both the Butterworth and Kota Bharu bases showed the radar contact arriving from the area of the last known position of Flight 370, the person familiar with the investigation said.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/16/world/asia/series-of-errors-by-malaysia-mounts-complicating-the-task-of-finding-flight-370.html?_r=0

So the Malaysian government were aware of exactly what had happened, when it happened and permitted it to happen!

 The media CNN and Richard Quest
It was the American media CNN that gained the lead in the story of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370.  Their journalist, Richard Quest was an expert on the subject.  How was Richard Quest an expert on MH370?  Well, he and his crew actually flew on the aircraft from Hong Kong to K L on the 19^th of February 2014 with the 1^st Officer Fariq Ab Hamidand filmed the event.

http://edition.cnn.com/video/?/video/us/2014/03/08/newday-quest-malaysia-plane-search.cnn&video_referrer=

Anderson Cooper: “We’re now bringing in Richard Quest who has ‘Actually’ (nervous) .. COINCIDENTALLY (Anderson changed the sentence to” incidentally .. “) has been shooting a story on the” airline “(Malaysia Airlines) and has spent time with the airline’s CEO … “

So, just exactly who is Richard Quest?  An article from the Jerusalem Post by Dorit Ofek-Arnon published on the 25^th of December 2006, when Richard Quest moved from the BBC to CNN answers that question.
http://www.jpost.com/Features/Passionate-Quest
So Richard Quest was doing a ‘story’ on the 19^th of February 2014 which involved the 1^st Officer Fariq Ab Hamid  of the missing flight MH370, that is 17 days prior to the hijacking of MH370.  That cannot be considered coincidental!
http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/14/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-pilot-profiles/
Final maintenance on  flight MH370
The missing aircraft (registration 9M-MRO, s/n 28420, line #404) had accumulated 53,465 flight hours in 7,525 flight cycles since delivery to MH in May 2002. Maintenance last undergone on 23 Feb 2014. 9M-MRO was involved in an incident in Shanghai Pudong International Airport on 09 August 2012, when the tip of its wing collided with a China Eastern Airlines Airbus A340-600 in a "wing clip" incident; the wing was subsequently repaired. 
Exactly who is ‘In Charge’ of the Investigation into MH370?
It is Malaysia that has suffered the loss of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370.  It is Malaysia’s responsibility to investigate properly all aspects of this event.  Any assistance from any other country such as Australia, or France. Britain or even America have neither the right nor the responsibility to usurp the leadership in this investigation, unless of course that country was responsible for the event in the first place.  That being so, then why would the FBI pressure the Malaysian government into who should be interviewed?

Meanwhile, the investigators are also trying to examine Shah's family including his estranged wife Faizah Khan. Though separated, she shares the same roof with Shah. She has not been approached by the police for the past two weeks, but the Malaysian authorities are increasingly under pressure from FBI officials to question her.

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/malaysia-airlines-mh370-pilot-captain-shah-received-phone-call-stolen-number-hours-before-take-off-1441438

The FBI is an American Federal government body.  It has no jurisdiction within Malaysia whatsoever.  So, just exactly why is the FBI trying to tell the Malaysian authorities how to do their job?  There is of course, the other American body, the CIA which frequently masquerades as the FBI, but the CIA have even less authority than the FBI, so just exactly what is the American Federal government up to in Malaysia?
This story gets even better.  http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/54062
Twenty-six countries are now helping to hunt for the plane after satellite and military radar data projected two huge corridors through which it might have flown.

Satellite data suggests that the last "ping" was received from the flight somewhere close to the Maldives and the US naval base on Diego Garcia.

But the Maldives is not amongst the countries that Malaysian authorities had sought help from in its search for the missing jet. Malaysia has listed the countries that it had appealed for assistance: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, India, China, Myanmar, Laos, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia and France.
So witnesses in the Maldives actually saw the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 at 6.15am on Monday the 8^th of March.  The last ‘satellite’ ping place flight MH370 close to the Maldives and the American base at Diego Garcia, and yet the Maldives were not asked to assist in the search for MH370.  “WHY”?
What we have with the Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 on the 8^th of March 2014, is hi-jacked, two ‘Iranian’ terrorists, and possibly more (another two in the initial reports), and all that is missing is a ‘target’ similar to that of 911.  The problem here is that flight MH 370 was last sighted in The Maldives, a resort destination with no possible target for which the ‘terrorists’ to attack, or was there?
The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife Sophie initiated WWIII
Who is the best known and loved couple in the world at this time?  How about William and Kate Windsor, the future king of England and his wife, Kate Middleton!  Where were William and Kate on the 8^th of March 2014?

Prince William and Kate in Maldives for vacation

Azuhaar Abdul Azeez, Haveeru Online

Mar 06, 2014 - 05:02

• 
  
• Duke and Duchess of Cambridge: The couple's holiday in the Maldives is going to last for a week. FILE PHOTO/ AFP

http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/53921
The British royal couple, Prince William and Kate Middleton arrived in the Maldives on Thursday for a vacation.

Haveeru has learned that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge had arrived in the Maldives at 9.45am via a British Airways flight. The royal couple is known to be spending their vacation at a resort in Noonu atoll.

Sources say that the royal couple's visit is going to be a week-long one.

William and Kate, 30, had married in a glorious reception in April 2011, after having been in a serious relationship with each other for many years. The couple had begotten a baby boy - Prince George - last year.

After their one week vacation in Maldives, they have planned official trips to New Zealand and Australia, which will last three weeks.

So, what would have been the world’s reaction had a airline, hi-jacked by two ‘Iranian’ terrorists crashed into the resort killing the Royal couple?
What would have been the emotional outburst of all the citizens of the British Commonwealth, that somebody would dare to murder their future king and Queen?
Would the British Prime Minister, David Cameron have declared war against Iran?  What would the British Prime Minister have told the Israeli Knesset in his speech on the 12^th of March 2014?
What most people do not realise is the security that the Royal family has.  This security consists of the very best people that the British Government has, and I mean the very best.  The only reason why flight MH370 did not hit the resort at Noonu Atoll would have been that the couple were moved out of harm’s way at the last moment.  It would have been these people who denied Bibi Netanyahu his greatest desire in initiating a war with Iran, and Prime Minister David Cameron initiating world war three.
However, it is the American input throughout this saga that is staggering.  For instance, we have the actual ‘security’ within the Maldives that raised certain fears as per this article on the 27^th of August 2013.
http://www.haveeru.com.mv/news/53921 
Maldives is finding it difficult to monitor its border due to flaws in the gratis border control system provided by the United States, a top immigration official told Haveeru Wednesday.
Would such flaws within the Maldives border control system permit an ‘Iranian terrorist’ to enter the country, and later subsequently leave after placing a directional beacon for a ‘hi-jacked’ MH370 to home in on?
Andrew S. MacGregor