SPACE-19. Apollo 1 to 6 - faked flights Apollo 7 to 10

"Moon plays": The moon was the Earth - Lies and Truth in the Atmosphere

19. Apollo 1 to 6 - faked flights Apollo 7 to 10

The fake of "Apollo flights" happened already during the preparation flights


Apollo 8: This Earth rise is a lie in colour. The foto is from the planet model
"LOLA" at Langley and is a foto composition.

by Michael Palomino (2006)

from: Gerhard Wisnewski: Lügen im Weltraum [Lies in Space]; Knaur 2005

Middle of 1967 / after the fire in Apollo 1

The "USA" stands with the Apollo program in front of a pile of broken glass

The Apollo capsule does not function, and the Lunar Module "Eagle" not either (Wisnewski, p.115).

Every Apollo mission from Apollo 2 to 10 has about 20,000 failed functions. Then since the "moon landings" since Apollo 11 suddenly shall have been all without any fault.

(In: Was The Apollo Moon Landing Fake? www.apfn.org/apfn/moon.htm (2006)

"US" propaganda is organizing a propaganda campaign now to perform at least a "moon landing" in the media until the end of the 1960s. According to the landing data on Earth from the flight back all Apollo flights are a fake, because the landings on the Earth are much too precise for a flight from an Earth orbit (Wisnewski, p'.237-243).

26 Feb 1966

Apollo 1
unmanned test flight. The name "Apollo 1" is only internal. The official name is AS-201 [Apollo-Saturn-201].
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)


5 July 1966

Apollo 2
unmanned test flight. The name "Apollo 2" is only internal. The official name is AS-202 [Apollo-Saturn-202].
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)


25 Aug 1966

Apollo 3
unmanned test flight. The name "Apollo 3" is only internal. The official name is AS-203 [Apollo-Saturn-203].
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)


27 Jan 1967

Apollo 1 accident

The test with three dead victims is retrospectively named "Apollo 1".
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)

April 1967
NASA takes the decision that next flight is named "Apollo 4"
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)


4 Nov 1967

Apollo 4

Apollo 4 is the first unmanned flight with a Saturn V rocket. The landing capsule is said to have landed in the Atlantic officially.
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 4)


22 Jan 1968

Apollo 5

The internal name is AS-204. There flies the rocket of Apollo 1 which has not started with Apollo 1 and only was standing on the launch pad.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 5)

The rocket flies in a near Earth orbit and has a Lunar Module on board (Lunar Module 1, LM-1), but according to Wisnewski without landing feet. The effect of the hard cosmic radiation on the electronic devices on board of the Lunar Module is not tested, and the performing of the landing feet of the Lunar Module in the high atmosphere not either. The landing engine is burning for 4 seconds instead of 39 seconds.

(In: Apollo 5: www.astrolink.de/m001/m001022/ (2006); Wisnewski, p.120)

Then the board computer stops the engine ahead of time, says the official version.

(In: http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 5)

The Lunar Module flies in its orbit and dies down on 12th February 1968 in the lower dense atmosphere.

For NASA these 4 seconds of a functioning landing engine are enough. Another flight test with the Lunar Module is not performed, but instead of a Lunar Module there is only dead freight in the rocket in the next alleged flights.

The next delivered Lunar Module, Lunar Module 2 (LM-2) is not used but is brought directly to the museum, the National Air and Space Museum at Washington DC.

(In: Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006); Wisnewski, p.120)


4 April 1968

Apollo 6

flies according to Wisnewski without Lunar Module with dead freight.

(In: Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006); Wisnewski, p.120)

After engine problems the rocket cannot reach the planned orbit and gets into an elliptic orbit. Officially the capsule lands in a distance of 80 km from the planned landing point in the Atlantic.
(http://en.wikipedia.org: Apollo 6)


11-22 Oct 1968

Faked flight Apollo 7

Officially Apollo 7 is the first manned flight in an Apollo capsule, the maiden flight (Wisnewski, p.110).

A pilot for the Lunar Module is officially on board, but there is officially no Lunar Module on board, but only dead freight.

(In: Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006); Wisnewski, p.120)

The official astronauts on board are  Donn Eisele, Walter Schirra and Walter Cunningham.
(http://de.wikipedia.com: Apollo 7)

According to the landing data with a distance from the planned landing point of 3,5 km respectively 3 km the landing of the manned capsule is much too precise to come from an orbit flight. This is a faked flight: The rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times already.

(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski, p.238-243).

[But the greedy media greedy for sensations are reporting a perfect flight to make propaganda against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the newspapers].


21-27 Dec 1968

Faked flight Apollo 8

Officially Apollo 8 has got a pilot for a Lunar Module on board, but also officially there is no Lunar Module on board but only dead freight. The flight allegedly leads to the moon around the moon, but there is no test of the Lunar Module if the electronic devices can survive the Van Allen belts or not.

(In: Paul Filmer: What happened to the Apollo LEMs after docking with the CSMs?
www.madsci.org/posts/archives/jun2001/991783298.As.r.html (2006); Wisnewski, S.120)

All claims of the NASA that the Lunar Module has been well tested are a lie (Wisnewski, p.121).

Officially the astronauts William A. Anders, James A. Lovell and Frank Bormann are on board.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 8)

But it seems that also this flight is not a "space flight" because the landing data for the manned capsule on Earth with a distance of only 2.6 resp. 2 km from the planned landing point are much too precise and the capsule cannot have come from a "moon flight". This is a faked flight: The rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times already.

(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski, S.238-243).

[But the greedy media greedy for sensations are reporting a perfect flight to make propaganda against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the newspapers].

Apollo 8: Faked NASA fotos and presentation of a faked flight
Apollo 8: This Earth rise is a lie in colour. The foto is from the planet model at Langley and is a foto composition.	Apollo 8: This re-entry into the lower dense atmosphere is a lie. The stars must not have tails.	Apollo 8: Rescue of the capsule in the water with 2.6 resp. 2 km distance from the planned landing point. This is a perfect airdrop.	Apollo 8: The astronaut come out of the helicopter on the air craft carrier. Welcome ceremony with media ceremony.

LOLA planetarium with a big moon model with a railway around it to simulate moon orbits, and also foto compositions with other planets are possible...
Foto from 1 August1965, foto no.: L-65-5579.
(http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/contents.htm; http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4308/ch11.htm; (August 2006)

3-13 March 1969

Faked flight Apollo 9

Officially this is the first flight with a whole Lunar Module. But the flight officially reaches only a near Earth orbit. At the beginning of the test of the landing engine of the Lunar Module the engine begins to spit and to stutter (Wisnewski, p.121).

Officially the astronauts James McDivitt, David R. Scott and Russell L. Schweickart are on board.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 9)

According to the landing data with a distance of only 5 km from the planned landing point for the manned capsule the landing is much too precise and it cannot be a flight from an Earth orbit. This is a faked flight: The rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over the landing spot as if it had been in training 1000s of times already.

(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski, p.238-243).

Splashdown of Apollo 9 The splashdown of "Apollo 9". The media made a joke of it to show the splashdown live in TV by helicopter to pretend to the public the capsule had come from a "moon flight"... [The greedy media greedy for sensations are again reporting a perfect flight to make propaganda against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the newspapers].

Four months yet to the first "moon landing"...


18-26 May 1969

Faked flight Apollo 10

Apollo 10 is officially said have reached the moon with the whole Lunar Module. The flight of the Lunar Module in space is said to have flown smoothly, but an unmanned landing shall not have been performed (Wisnewski, p.121).

Officially the astronauts Eugene Cernan, Thomas Stafford and John W. Young are on Bord.
(http://de.wikipedia.org: Apollo 10)

According to the landing data wit a distance of 2.4 km from the landing point for the manned capsule the landing is much too precise for a flight coming from an Earth orbit or from a "moon flight". This is a faked flight: The rocket started empty and the astronauts came by parachute airdrop over the landing spot as if it had been in training 1,000s of times already.

(In: Kaysing, Bill: We Never Went to the Moon: America's Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle, Pomeroy 2002; http://en.wikipedia.org: Splashdown; Wisnewski, p.238-243).

[But the greedy media greedy for sensations are again reporting a perfect flight to make propaganda against the "Soviet Union" and to rise the circulation of the newspapers].

Apollo 10: Faked NASA fotos and the presentation of a faked flight
	Apollo 10 foto 1: Start of an empty rocket
	Apollo 10 foto 2: NASA claims this would be a moon's horizon. This is a horizon of the moon model from simulation center at Langley...
	Apollo 10 foto 3: NASA claims this would be the moon surface with long shadows. The foto comes from the moon model from the simulation center at Langley and has been coloured retrospectively... The shadows seem to be much too long for the perspective. And it's strange that the shadows on foto 2 are not this extremely black as on foto 3...
	Apollo 10 foto 4: NASA claims this rills on the moon. The foto comes from the planet model of the simulation center at Langley. Such geometrically precisely cut craters are not possible in nature. It seems somebody had really geometrical precisely modeled...
	Apollo 10 foto 5: NASA claims this would be a crater landscape from the moon. The landscape is from the planet model at Langley from the simulation center. When you see the long shadows on the moon on foto 3 and 4 the shadows are here much too short.

On the so called "moon fotos" there is no unity according to the intensity of shadows and there is no logic between the lengths of the shadow according to the perspective. The fotos are faked products of the CIA foto laboratory. And the CIA headquarter has it's seat... at Langley, where the simulation center with the planet model is.

We have 2 months yet to the first "moon landing"...