http://patriotsquestion911.com/survivors.html#McIntyre
Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:
Aircraft Parts as a Positive Clue to Aircraft Identity
Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious, but small hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged.
Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government’s alleged version of what actually caused the total destruction of the WTC buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.
--------------------------------------------------
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former
U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator and airplane parts
authority. Graduate, U.S. Air Force War College. 34-year Air Force
career.
Licensed commercial pilot. Licensed airframe and powerplant mechanic. - Essay: "In all my years of
direct and indirect participation, I never witnessed nor even heard
of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was accessible, that
prevented investigators from finding enough hard evidence
to positively identify the make, model, and specific
registration number of the aircraft -- and in most cases
the precise cause of the accident. ...
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than 3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft. On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was deliberately kept hidden from public view. …
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site, any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757 did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged. Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged. …
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country's history."
Impossible to Prove a Falsehood True:
Aircraft Parts as a Positive Clue to Aircraft Identity
by George Nelson
Colonel, USAF (ret.)
Colonel, USAF (ret.)
The precautionary principle is based on the fact it is
impossible to prove a false claim. Failure to prove a claim does not
automatically make it false, but caution is called for, especially in
the case of a world-changing event like the alleged terror attacks of
September 11, 2001. The Bush administration has provided no public
evidence to support its claim that the terror attacks were the work of
Muslim extremists or even that the aircraft that struck their respective
targets on September 11 were as advertised. As shown below, it would
be a simple matter to confirm the government’s official storyline if it
were based upon facts supported by physical evidence, but that has not
been the case. Meanwhile, physical evidence continues to mount which
suggests that the 9/11 attacks on the New York World Trade Centers and
the US Pentagon were part of an Israeli Mossad operation, carried out
with the full cooperation of high level elements within our own
government.
In
July 1965 I had just been commissioned as a Second Lieutenant in the U.
S. Air Force after taking a solemn oath that I would protect and defend
the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and that I
would bear true faith and allegiance to the same. I took that oath very
seriously. It was my constant companion throughout a thirty-year
military career in the field of aircraft maintenance.
As an additional duty, aircraft maintenance officers, along
with other specialists are occasionally tasked as members of aircraft
accident investigation boards and my personal experience was no
exception. In 1989 I graduated from the Aircraft Mishap Investigation
Course at the Institute of Safety and Systems Management at the
University of Southern California. In addition to my direct
participation as an aircraft accident investigator, I reviewed countless
aircraft accident investigation reports for thoroughness and
comprehensive conclusions for the Inspector General, HQ Pacific Air
Forces during the height of the Vietnam conflict.
In all my years of direct and indirect participation, I never
witnessed nor even heard of an aircraft loss, where the wreckage was
accessible, that prevented investigators from finding enough hard
evidence to positively identify the make, model, and specific
registration number of the aircraft — and in most cases the precise
cause of the accident. This is because every military and civilian
passenger-carrying aircraft have many parts that are identified for
safety of flight. That is, if any of the parts were to fail at any time
during a flight, the failure would likely result in the catastrophic
loss of aircraft and passengers. Consequently, these parts are
individually controlled by a distinctive serial number and tracked by a
records section of the maintenance operation and by another section
called plans and scheduling.
Following a certain number of flying hours or, in the case of
landing gears, a certain number of takeoff-and-landing cycles, these
critical parts are required to be changed, overhauled or inspected by
specialist mechanics. When these parts are installed, their serial
numbers are married to the aircraft registration numbers in the aircraft
records and the plans and scheduling section will notify maintenance
specialists when the parts must be replaced. If the parts are not
replaced within specified time or cycle limits, the airplane will
normally be grounded until the maintenance action is completed. Most of
these time-change parts, whether hydraulic flight surface actuators ,
pumps, landing gears, engines or engine components, are virtually
indestructible. It would be impossible for an ordinary fire resulting
from an airplane crash to destroy or obliterate all of those critical
time-change parts or their serial numbers. I repeat, impossible.
Considering the catastrophic incidents of September 11 2001,
certain troubling but irrefutable conclusions must be drawn from the
known facts. I get no personal pleasure or satisfaction from reporting
my own assessment of these facts.
United Airlines Flight 93
This flight was reported by the federal government to be a
Boeing 757 aircraft, registration number N591UA, carrying 45 persons,
including four Arab hijackers who had taken control of the aircraft,
crashing the plane in a Pennsylvania farm field.
Aerial photos of the alleged crash site were made available to
the general public. They show a significant hole in the ground, but
private investigators were not allowed to come anywhere near the crash
site. If an aircraft crash caused the hole in the ground, there would
have literally hundreds of serially-controlled time-change parts within
the hole that would have proved beyond any shadow of doubt the precise
tail-number or identity of the aircraft. However, the government has not
produced any hard evidence that would prove beyond a doubt that the
specifically alleged aircraft crashed at that site. On the contrary, it
has been reported that the aircraft, registry number N591UA, is still in
operation.
American Airlines Flight 11
This flight was reported by the government to be a Boeing 767,
registration number N334AA, carrying 92 people, including five Arabs who
had hijacked the plane. This plane was reported to have crashed into
the north tower of the WTC complex of buildings.
Again, the government would have no trouble proving its case if
only a few of the hundreds of serially controlled parts had been
collected to positively identify the aircraft. A Boeing 767 landing gear
or just one engine would have been easy to find and identify.
United Airlines Flight 175
This flight was reported to be a Boeing 767, registration
number N612UA, carrying 65 people, including the crew and five
hijackers. It reportedly flew into the south tower of the WTC.
Once more, the government has yet to produce one serially
controlled part from the crash site that would have dispelled any
questions as to the identity of the specific airplane.
American Airlines Flight 77
This was reported to be a Boeing 757, registration number
N644AA, carrying 64 people, including the flight crew and five
hijackers. This aircraft, with a 125-foot wingspan, was reported to have
crashed into the Pentagon, leaving an entry hole no more than 65 feet
wide.
Following cool-down of the resulting fire, this crash site
would have been very easy to collect enough time-change equipment within
15 minutes to positively identify the aircraft registry. There was
apparently some aerospace type of equipment found at the site but no
attempt was made to produce serial numbers or to identify the specific
parts found. Some of the equipment removed from the building was
actually hidden from public view.
Conclusion
The government alleges that four wide-body airliners crashed on
the morning of September 11 2001, resulting in the deaths of more than
3,000 human beings, yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence has been
produced in an attempt to positively identify any of the four aircraft.
On the contrary, it seems only that all potential evidence was
deliberately kept hidden from public view. The hard evidence would have
included hundreds of critical time-change aircraft items, plus security
videotapes that were confiscated by the FBI immediately following each
tragic episode.
With all the evidence readily available at the Pentagon crash site,
any unbiased rational investigator could only conclude that a Boeing 757
did not fly into the Pentagon as alleged.Similarly, with all the evidence available at the Pennsylvania crash site, it was most doubtful that a passenger airliner caused the obvious, but small hole in the ground and certainly not the Boeing 757 as alleged.
Regarding the planes that allegedly flew into the WTC towers, it is only just possible that heavy aircraft were involved in each incident, but no evidence has been produced that would add credence to the government’s alleged version of what actually caused the total destruction of the WTC buildings, let alone proving the identity of the aircraft. It is time to apply the precautionary principle.
As painful and heartbreaking as was the loss of innocent lives and the lingering health problems of thousands more, a most troublesome and nightmarish probability remains that so many Americans appear to be involved in the most heinous conspiracy in our country’s history.
--------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment