SURVIVAL PHYSICS: A Brief Summary
R.D. Pearson BSc., C.Eng.M.I. Mech.E
March 5, 2003
Introduction
Quite
a number of people have realised that quantum theory must link with
evidence proving the continued existence of consciousness following
death of the brain. The most recent contribution of this nature I have
seen is the excellent article The Quantum Marriage, by Will Hand (1).
He shows, for example, that quantum theorists were driven to accept
that on the small scale of the atom, what we interpret as "reality" only
occurs at the instant of observation. This is the so-called Copenhagen
interpretation of a phenomenon called "wave-particle duality": an
important feature of quantum theory. Quantum theorists found that, on
these small scales, what had been regarded as minute objects, the
electrons, photons and other components associated with atoms, seemed to
exist as sets of interfering waves until observed. Only then did these
waves "collapse" to become real particles. The extraordinary situation,
which has prevailed for nearly a century is that, despite the clear
acceptance of the role of consciousness in creating reality, all
mainstream scientists still insist that consciousness vanishes on brain
death. The obvious paradox, which is never mentioned, is that matter
could not exist prior to any brain! The development of quantum theory
has, therefore, already proved that some form of consciousness had to
pre-exist the creation of matter. Yet scientists, across every
discipline, go to immense trouble to discredit all evidence showing that
consciousness can exist independently of matter. Most enlightened
people, like Hand, have had personal experience demonstrating to them
that at least some so-called, "paranormal" experiences have to be real
phenomena and cannot be explained away by delusion or fraud as most
scientists and parapsychologists insist must be the case. Then some of
the enlightened seek explanations from twentieth century physics. This
is perfectly sensible and reasonable but is not the way my own
contribution came into being. I started without any intention of
considering survival or any other aspects of the paranormal. I had
simply started to take an interest in physics as it stood. Then in 1984,
I realised something was wrong with the logic associated with the "big
bang" theory. This has it that all the energy and matter of the universe
was created in a gigantic explosion taking only a split second. From
then on the total substance of the universe, its energy plus matter,
remained constant and, being pulled back by mutual gravity, the flying
debris would decelerate ever afterwards.
Flaws in the
logic had led directly to a huge false prediction called the
"Cosmological Constant". This says that the universe is expanding at
rates many billions of billions of times faster than astronomical
observations could possibly allow and theorists, to this day, still look
for a resolution to this problem. What is also extraordinary is that
theorists simply ignore this huge false prediction and yet claim that
the big bang theory is fully supported by all the observations they have
made!
I realised that I ought to be able to create a
flaw-free alternative theory capable of eliminating the difficulty,
using the expertise of my own discipline. I soon found some other
difficulties in need of resolution and so treated them all
simultaneously as a single holistic problem. The solution, which began
to appear in a few years, showed me that the paranormal and survival of
consciousness must be real and true: an integral part of what I think of
as an enlightened physics. Not until then did I embark on a search for
evidence and did so by joining a circle for psychic development. This
was run by two mediums, Victor and Barbara Iles. I soon had all the
evidence I needed to support the theory. Then in 1988, I met Michael
Roll who showed me the powerful published scientific literature of
Crookes, Lodge and other scientists, showing me how this evidence,
amounting to the total proof of survival, had all been suppressed and
discredited by other scientists and parapsychologists who had perceived
it all as a threat to existing paradigms.
Hence, to
me, survival appeared as unexpected spin-off from an effort made to
solve physical problems. It is therefore my opinion that this approach
supplies a much greater credibility than one which merely attempts to
fit existing quantum theory to survival fact, especially when the flaws
in that theory are not eliminated.
Survival Physics in a Nutshell
The
other main problem needing resolution was a theory of gravity
compatible with quantum theory. Einstein's theory called "general
relativity", a mathematically very accurate description of the way
matter behaves on the large cosmic scale, is still accepted to be the
best in existence. Unfortunately, as all physicists freely admit, it
just does not match in with quantum theory. They have been trying for
nearly 80 years to match these two so-called "pillars of twentieth
century achievement" and success still evades them. I will summarise my
own final solution which gives mostly the same end equations as general
relativity, eliminates the difficulty of the cosmological constant and
then shows how an ultimate immortal consciousness must exist as part of
an invisible background medium.
It seemed to me that
the trouble with Einstein's theory was that the assumptions on which it
was based made it incompatible with the existence of any background
medium, such as the old aether. The latter was discredited about 1900
and is still regarded as non-existent, yet something like it is needed
if quantum theory is to make sense. Therefore the assumptions of
relativity needed modification. This is something theorists still will
not accept since, in effect, this means the abandonment of relativity
theory.
Newton's mechanics seemed the only
alternative but is restricted to low speeds. Revision therefore seemed
necessary to make it exact. I found that the mass of an object needed to
be regarded as variable instead of remaining constant as Newton had
assumed. A background medium had to exist and had to be more compressed
the closer the approach to a massive object: the density of the aether
had to be variable. This variable density, coupled with the variable
mass, gave the same predictions as general relativity but offered the
huge advantage of being fully quantum compatible.
Although
mostly the same end equations appeared, they had a different meaning
and interpretation. For example, as most people know, a clock situated
at a low level in a gravitational field runs slow due to Einstein's
concept of "gravitational time dilation": time itself runs slower at a
lower level. For the revised Newtonian time runs at the same rate
everywhere but there is a gravitational mass increase with reduction of
level and this reduces the frequency of vibration of the clock
mechanism.
The same revised Newtonian then needed to
be applied to study the background medium, assumed to operate on similar
mechanics but in such a manner as to explain the peculiarities of
quantum theory. In effect this mechanics was being assumed to apply both
on large cosmological scales and at a sub-quantum level of reality. The
hope was that the peculiarities at the quantum level would emerge as a
natural consequence.
First the problem of the
cosmological constant needed to be addressed. The only way the revised
mechanics could provide a solution was by making a further revision. A
mirror mechanics had to be added having all masses and energy values
considered negative. Then the background medium, I now call the
"i-ther", had to consist of a mixture of particles, some made of
positive energy and with the remainder of a negative kind. Then both
kinds could be created or destroyed in balance because the changes would
cancel out. To understand what this entails it is easiest to think of
the energy form known as mechanical work. An object is pushed a given
distance and the work done is obtained by multiplying the pushing force
by the distance it moves. If the object is free to move it will
accelerate, so absorbing the work done and turning it into energy of
motion: kinetic energy. (This also adds a "kinetic mass" causing a mass
increase according to the revised Newtonian.)
If now
the energy from which the object is made is considered negative then a
backward facing force will cause it to accelerate. So negative
mechanical work is converted to negative kinetic energy and there will
be an associated increase of negative mass. There is nothing peculiar
about such negative mass and energy. We could do all our mechanics on
these assumptions and get all the same responses because the negative
effects always come in pairs and cancel out.
The
really new feature, however, is that now both kinds of energy,
considered complementary to one another like the Yin and Yang of Eastern
philosophies, are considered to co-exist. They have to form a mixture
of fast moving "primaries" in constant collision with one another like
the molecules of a gas. Collisions of primaries of the same energies
were just like those of billiard balls. For evaluating responses of
unlike kinds, however, it was necessary to extend the mechanics by
introducing what I call, "Opposed Energy Dynamics". Just as in ordinary
mechanics it is necessary to consider two conservation laws together:
those of energy and momentum. Applied to opposite energies in collision,
however, responses turned out to be very different from those between
like kinds.
An astonishing mathematical discovery
emerged. At each collision of opposites, the need to conserve momentum
forced each primary to gain energy. They were breeding like opposite
sexes! Each of the collision partners gained energy of its own kind in
balanced amounts. It meant that pure creation could spontaneously arise
from a void of nothingness! This meant the i-ther could spontaneously
appear from nothing and grow at an ever accelerating and extremely rapid
rate, both in volume and density. Fortunately at a critical density
instability would arise allowing flow patterns on a minute scale to
appear. Primaries would be pushed by the pure creation going on behind
them so that they flowed in large numbers to common centres from all
directions. The conditions for almost total mutual annihilation had
appeared so that only a minute net creation could remain.
A
solution to the cosmological constant had appeared naturally! The
i-ther would be committed to a modest ever-accelerating growth and,
after matter had appeared, the universe of matter would be carried along
so that it too would expand in a similar way. This prediction was not
finalised until 1992 but I thought no way would ever be found for
checking this prediction. However, in 1998 astronomical observations of
very distant supernovae, published by Schwartzchild (2),
confirmed that indeed the universe was expanding at an accelerating
rate: so lending fortuitous support to the theory. Cosmologists on the
other hand were taken by surprise and are still trying to explain the
effect in terms of dark energy with strange repulsive powers.
The
centres of annihilation are most stable as filaments existing in
bundles but on larger scales these bundles have random orientation.
Switch-like T-junctions appear as filaments try to cross each other.
Also the cell-like structures of breeding cylinders, with filaments of
annihilation at their centres, act like tiny engines producing power.
This power can only be expressed in the form of waves of switching
action as one switch, in changing state, triggers the next. A fluid
component of breeding primaries bathes the filaments and so forms an
additional medium for wave propagation. A source for quantum waves seems
to have appeared! In addition the filaments seem to have the potential
for evolving a brain-like structure: a background neural net. Hence my
speculation is that consciousness evolved at the level of i-ther long
before matter appeared.
At some point this
consciousness developed a creative urge and built an interpenetrating
system of universes of matter as a means of providing meaningful
habitats for minds. Each mind would be a fragment of the i-theric
consciousness, separated from the rest by information filter barriers.
The
only tools available for building such matter systems were the quantum
waves. Hence a perfect reason for the strange wave-particle nature of
matter seemed to have appeared. To make what we infer to be a sub-atomic
particle, waves had to be focused. At any focal point a transient spike
of density in the i-ther would be generated to represent that particle
and it would behave as such in collision with others built the same way.
Then to make say, an electron, such focusing would need to be repeated
very rapidly with places chosen by the i-ther using its own kind of
computational mathematics. Any "particle" would really be a train of
repeated creations joined end to end in time but not in position. The
train of positions would be so chosen as to make it appear as if
controlled be an electromagnetic force. Similar positioning would make
the nuclei of atoms seem controlled by a strong nuclear force. Hence the
forces, seeming so real to us, now appear as abstract mathematical
constructs. Matter cannot be as real as it appears: true reality lies in
the invisible, in the real energies at the level of i-ther.
This
model, worked out in detail, provided a new and paradox free
interpretation for both wave-particle duality and non-locality.
As
each wave passed the focal point, to make a sub-atomic particle, it
then started to spread out again travelling ultimately to infinite
distance. As it went it caused increase in the collision of primaries
and so stimulated excess creation. This mechanism was studied in detail
and found to provide a satisfactory explanation for the variable density
needed to create a satisfactory theory of gravity. The "quantum-wave
theory of gravity" had appeared and seems every bit as good in
predictive power as general relativity.
Conclusion
From
a start made to solve a difficulty in the big bang theory,
consciousness has been shown to have the potential of being immortal. If
the brain is conscious as well, it cannot be the primary one. The
latter must still remain after the brain has died.
It
is my hope that, since survival can be shown an essential and integral
part of physics, that the efforts still being made to discredit all
evidence of survival will soon come to an end. This theory has achieved
publication in Russian conference proceedings (3 & 4) of 1991 and 1993, and in the peer-reviewed journal "Frontier Perspectives" (5) in 1997. Two books by Pearson (6 & 7)
provide further detail. Furthermore the theory was supported by Dr
Peter Wadhams, Professor of Ocean Physics at Cambridge University, on
the Jeff Rense Progam (8)
in 2001. At least he said that a theory of this kind had to apply.
Other details can be found on the websites of The Campaign for
Philosophical Freedom (9) and The International Survivalist Society (10).
REFERENCES
1.
|
Hand, Will: The Quantum Marriage: The Seeker Vol.2 No.4 Spring 2003
|
2.
|
Schwarzchild, B.: Very distant Supernova Suggest that the Cosmic Expansion is Speeding Up: Physics Today, Vol.51(6) pp.17-19
|
3.
|
Pearson, Ronald D.:
Alternative to Relativity including Quantum Gravitation: Second
International Conference on Problems in Space and Time: St. Petersburg,
Petrovskaja Academy of Sciences & Arts [Sept.1991]: pp 278-292
Chairman Local Organising Committee: Dr. Michael Varin: Pulkovskoye Road
65-9-1 St. Petersburg 196140, Russia. FAX: (7) (812) 291-81-35 Phone:
Alexandre Alekseev: office:(7) (812) 291-36-73, Home:(7) (812) 173-55-69
E-Mail: consym@saman.spb.su
|
4.
|
Pearson, Ronald D.:
Quantum Gravitation and the Structured Ether Sir Isaac Newton
Conference. St. Petersburg [March 1993] pp 39-55 (Address as Ref.3)
|
5.
|
Pearson, Ronald D.: Consciousness as a Sun-Quantum Phenomenon Frontier Perpectives, Spring/Summer 1997, Vol.6,No.2 pp70-78 (also see ref. 10)
|
6.
|
Pearson, Ronald D.: Intelligence Behind the Universe: [Dec.1990] 370 pages (520 grams) A popularisation plus Technical Appendix Available from Michael Roll
|
7.
|
Pearson, Ronald D.: Origin of Mind [Dec.1992]: -A popularisation plus Technical Appendix 72 pages: (110 grams) direct from Michael Roll (see ref.6 or 9).
|
8.
|
Jeff Rense Program: www.rense.com (Date 3 Nov. 2001 in America)
|
9.
|
Roll, Michael: The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death (on www.cfpf.org.uk)
|
10.
|
Jones, Tom. M.: www.survivalafterdeath.org (gives ref. 5 in full)
|
11.
|
Keen, Montague: Ellison, Arthur: Fontana, David (of the Society for Psychical Research UK): The Scole Report: (gives recent valuable evidence) Proc. Soc. of Psychical Research Vol.58, Part 220 (1999)
|
----------
===============
|
No comments:
Post a Comment