Individuals need to experience PSI themselves for personal proof
Ronald Pearson (August, 2003)
Having
 been exposed to a scientific training I have been a sceptic for most of
 my life. However, efforts I made to resolve a cosmological puzzle led 
me to wonder about this. Then my wife spotted an advert for people to 
join a circle for psychic development. We joined and I went along 
feeling rather foolish since, on balance, I thought all I would be doing
 was witnessing some kind of group-generated delusion.
The
 very first meeting dissolved this fear. I will just recount one 
experience to show why proof needs personal involvement. The proof is 
not transmissible to others. After a few months the two organising 
mediums, man and wife, brought in a middle-aged lady who stood apart 
from our group. We were told the reason for her presence would be 
disclosed later, but first we would enter the usual group meditation 
procedure. I was unable to relax since I was suffering pain from a crick
 in the neck. It was very painful and I could not understand how this 
had happened. I was glad when the meditation was over. Then Barbara, the
 medium who was the main organiser, brought the circle back to 
attention. We were to recount all we had picked up. This week was 
disappointing because nobody had much to tell. When it came to my turn I
 said, with my neck still giving me jip, that I had seen nothing (as 
usual).
Then at the end Barbara asked the visitor to 
say why she was here. "I am very disappointed that so little has 
emerged", she said, "I was hoping for something from my brother who was 
killed last week on his motor bike. He broke his neck". I nearly jumped 
out of my seat exclaiming, "My neck pain's gone!" "What neck pain?", 
said Victor, the other medium. "I've had a terrible crick in my neck all
 evening and it just suddenly vanished when she said her brother's neck 
was broken". "You pillock! You said you picked nothing up" "I did not 
realise it was psychically induced until now. I thought it was real."
This
 constitutes personal proof, but if I recount it to a sceptic and 
especially an obscurant, it is no proof to them. The answer will be 
something like, "Any fool can make up a story like that", emphasised 
with derisive laughter. But I guarantee that anybody who wishes will get
 direct personal proof if they really go into this area of physics and 
test it for themselves. And now I come to the point of this preamble. It
 gave confidence that the mediums were genuine and that psi effects 
could not be discarded as fraud or delusion.
Why SETI will never succeed
At
 a late stage and at my request, we carried out an experiment to measure
 the speed of telepathic thought propagation. I was expecting a finite 
value, possibly many times the speed of light. Victor was a trance 
medium, something rather special, and his guide was his uncle who had 
been a docker in Bristol. He had told us previously that he could be in 
several places at the same time and this had given me an idea. If he 
could put two of himself at widely separated points, such as one here 
and the other on the moon, then we could time an echo. When I said "Go" 
and started a stopwatch he could repeat "Go" when the word came back.
The
 guide had agreed to this, but said telepathy would take no time. It 
would take 2.5 seconds for light to bounce back from the moon but no 
time lag was detectable. It was therefore necessary to try the planet 
Mars.
Now we come to the interesting bit. The guide 
said he knew nothing about astronomy since it had never been of interest
 to him. The only way he could help was if we could give him a very 
accurate description of what it was like. "I have to visualise it and 
think hard and then I will be there." So we tried each planet in turn 
and at each the guide gave us a graphic description of what he could see
 and experience. Then when I was satisfied we had the right place we did
 the test. Each time the echo was immediate until we got to Pluto. Then I
 recorded about half a second. But now Vic's voice was changing and it 
was clear he was coming out of trance. This last trial had therefore to 
be discarded.
About six years later I tried the same 
thing with a different medium at a "Mensa at Malvern" conference in 
1997. This time we went out to the stars. Again the echo was immediate, 
so confirming the previous result. So telepathy takes no time at all!
The
 point of all this is that SETI has not returned a single result after 
many years of effort and despite $millions in funding. It is never 
likely to succeed! If advanced intelligences live on planets orbiting 
other stars, they will not be using radio to contact us when a different
 channel, offering immediate access, is already available. If they used 
radio they would need to wait decades for a reply.
An
 instant medium for communication evidently exists and can be used if 
only astronomers would accept the reality of the "paranormal". At 
present the whole spectrum of scientific disciplines simply refuses to 
accept this reality, and instead makes great effort to discredit its 
very existence. All that astronomers need do is find a good trance 
medium and devise a way of describing a target star to the guide. Then a
 close inspection of any planets can be given.
"Survival Physics"
Not
 all scientists dispute that the so-called "paranormal" can be real and 
some have attempted scientific explanations. Professors Archie Roy and 
David Fontana, for example, propose that effects "outside space and 
time" cause psi phenomena. This then leaves all science untouched but 
makes no effort to explain anything.
One quantum 
physicist, who wishes to remain anonymous, has offered more of an 
explanation for the survival of consciousness and telepathy inclusive of
 mediumship.
Quantum theory applies to the minute 
scale of the atom and here everything acts as if controlled by wave 
patterns, like the ripples in a pond made when several pebbles are 
thrown in. These "wave functions", as they are called, are not real 
waves but are more like abstract numbers. He thinks consciousness could 
be the quantum wave itself. It interacts with the human nervous system 
to create a copy in space. At death, the coupling is gone but quantum 
waves are defined across all space and time. They don't go away, they 
just continue to change. Further, the illusion of location comes from 
the physical. Because the quantum wave exists across all space, 
telepathy would be instantaneous. All that matters is the rapport level 
of the two individuals communicating
This is more 
detailed, but is clearly incomplete. What makes these quantum waves? If 
they are all number-like then some intelligence must be organising them 
and needs a power source for operation. Quantum theory seemed to suggest
 our universe to be a deliberate contrivance by an even deeper level of 
reality Furthermore the existing big bang, part of quantum theory, makes
 a hopelessly wrong prediction. It arises because theorists can find no 
way to switch off the creative explosion they have postulated.
My
 own research was aimed at finding how the waves could arise, leaving 
quantum theory unaltered, and to solve the big bang problem. A theory 
for the immortality of consciousness emerged as a by-product, together 
with an explanation for almost the entire spectrum of the paranormal. 
This meant that, instead of appearing as a threat to be discredited, it 
was paranormal no longer. It could now be regarded as an essential part 
of physics. It began by proposing that at a base level of reality minute
 particles called "primaries" existed out of which all else was made. 
They existed made from two opposite and complementary kinds of energy. 
When opposite kinds collided the maths, based on the way we observe 
energy to behave, showed them to breed, causing an initial explosive 
creation. But then mutual annihilation set in to cancel most of this 
creation, though it still continued unabated. This left an 
ever-accelerating expansion fitting astronomical observation. The 
problem of the big bang theory seemed to have been solved!
The
 annihilation process resulted in the formation of a tangled 
three-dimensional web of filaments of incredibly fine spacing. This 
generated the required power source. It was inferred that the web might 
evolve a background consciousness able to create universes out of 
itself. It had to do so by generating organised wave patterns.
Our
 minds inhabit matter for a short time but then remain as part of the 
background intelligence. In this way the organising force could have 
arisen from the void without a pre-existing God. If the theory holds up 
it promises to give an answer to the conundrum of how such a complicated
 existence as our universe could have created itself.
Of
 course it cannot be proved that energy behaves the same way at this 
ultimate background level as at the level we observe. However, the 
theory does show that psi effects cannot be excluded from scientific 
explanation.
| 
 | 
 Survival research - Letter from Prof. Wadhams to Michael Roll (August 11, 2000)
Scientific Proof - Letter from Prof. Archie Roy to Michael Roll (May 9, 1983)
----------------
 http://www.cfpf.org.uk/articles/rdp/psi/psi.html
============================= 
 
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment